Most CONTROVERSIAL Line Calls On The ATP Tour! | Part 2
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 гру 2023
- SUBSCRIBE to our channel for the best ATP tennis videos and tennis highlights: ua-cam.com/users/tennistv?sub_...
Watch official ATP tennis streams from every tournament: tnn.is/UA-cam
Tennis TV is the OFFICIAL live streaming service of the ATP Tour.
Tennis TV features live streaming and video on demand of ATP tennis matches in full on PC, Mac, mobile & tablet apps on iOS & Android. Download the app to stream on your device: tnn.is/UA-cam
Plus Tennis TV is also available to stream tennis on your TV on Apple TV, Roku, Amazon Fire TV, Samsung Smart TV, LG Smart TV, Android TV, Xbox One as well as AirPlay and Chromecast.
Get help on Tennis TV with our virtual assistant: tnn.is/help-youtube
Buy Tennis TV merchandise in our store: tnn.is/store-youtube
Watch the ATP Tour via your local TV broadcaster: go.watchtenn.is/atp?p=yt&sour...
To enquire about licensing ATP Tour footage contact IMG Replay: imgreplay.com/client/atp_media
#tennis #tennistv #sports - Спорт
In case you missed it, watch part 1 here: ua-cam.com/video/tMXP_JL_FA4/v-deo.html
I saw both Tsitsipas and Nadal pointing to wrong ball marks. So much gamesmanship from those two. They should be called out
The one where Nadal played Goffin at the 2017 Monte Carlo was very shocking. Lost a ton of respect for Rafa for his behavior against Goffin
Happened to Nadal many times in his career, as it happened to all players. It was just a wrong line call. The line call is an umpires thing and not Rafas fault and Goffin lost completely 6 to 3//6 to 1. If you think that that was shoking, then it must be because you do not understand tennis or lack of a spine. Stop spreading misinformation.
@@user-tc9fn9ux2u Pretty sure he'd be dead or a non-functioning vegetable if he didn't have a spine.
So rafa took the decision? 😅
Yeah I remember it affected Goffin for the rest of the match too.
It’s in the 1st part
Nadal is far in the wrong against berdych, he also signalled to challenge in which he would have lost the point
Bernardes overruled, so the official call was "out". Since the call was reversed, it was clearly a replay. Nadal was absolutely right on this one.
@@MisterReZ doesn't matter, nadal had stopped play
@@pikachude5490 what was the umpire's call? In or out?
@@MisterReZ the ball landed but there was no initial call, so Nadal stopped the point by raising his finger, indicating he wanted a challenge since he thought the ball was out. Then the chair umpire called the ball out, so the call was out. Berdych then challenged the out call and Hawkeye showed the ball was in. So because Nadal stopped the point first, he lost it and there was no replay. Nadal was absolutely wrong in disputing the outcome
I know this is a slam but Medvedev vs Nadal in the 2019 US Open final in the 5th set at 2-2 in one of the deuce points was very notable. Medvedev starting serving with almost 2 to 3 seconds left in the shot clock and Nadal put his hand up signaling he was not ready. Medvedev served an ace. Seems like Nadal took away that ace from Medvedev. Did not like that move from Nadal and lost respect for Nadal. Seems like Medvedev got hard done there.
The same against Shapo in this AO 22 tournament during the entire match. You are not ready - lose the point. Shapo was right: they all are corrupted
At AO? not in the 5th at 2-2 that did not happen.
he had multiple points like that in that match, I remember at least two aces being stolen from Med (maybe even three, but not sure). It's weird how the points were replayed cause if you're not ready it's your problem, it's literally in the rules that the server sets the reasonable pace and you have to be ready. Even if you're Nadal who likes doing that
@@crookedsmile326 Exactly. Nadal did that every point against Zverev in the French Open Semi, made Zverev wait 30 seconds. It's against the rules and he should have been called. I'm like these people saying they lost respect for Nadal - I lost respect for him the very first time I saw him play. Most hated player for me.
There's a reason Kyrgios complained about it at Wimbledon for an hour against Rafa. We've all seen Rafa take more time so often. The time clock rule was put in place for players like him in the first place!
Carlos Bernardez is absolutely right, Nadal asks for challenge before his announcment
Not. Bernardes overruled the call, so the official call was out (regardless of nadal asking for the challenge).
In the Rune - Nole match - Why do they have the computer with the correct decision when they don’t use it? It’s so ridiculous that this situation happens and the umpire has to make a decision although they have the technique to avoid all of this.
Hawk-Eye hasn't been approved yet to work on clay (although I think they will have it ready soon). But I agree that there's no point showing the computer result if it doesn't actually affect the match
What is Nadal complaining about he stopped the point
Berdych stopped the point to challenge the out call. Nadal hit it back in. The point should have been replayed. The umpire was under the impression that he didn't hit it back in.
The whole thing was a mess, Nadal should have just challanged the ball and the umpire should have not called it out just because Nadal said so
@@rohitbalakrishnan5004 No, Nadal stopped play by raising his finger, and then the umpire called it out. Berdych then asked why he was calling out if Nadal already stopped play and challenged. Does n't matter that Nadal hit the ball back, he stopped play so the point was rightfully given to Berdych.
The referee called it out and berdych put it out.
@@christiandsouza the point is given after a failed challenge but since it was the umpire who called it out with the challenge from Berdych they should have replayed the point, that's what Nadal was arguing about
The two points Joker lost is really funny. I’m amazed by his acting. The ump did a very good job
Yeah he literally left the second ball and pointed out to get the call. He left an in ball. His fault. He just expected to influence the linesman, but the computer showed the truth.
As a Daniil huge fan myself, Andrey really deserved that win cuz what the line judges did to him in that first set tiebreak was brutal
Nadal showing his true colors.
Novax as well ☺️
@@khanhnguyen-cy6jmno
Let’s look at the anger management… 😊😉
Bro what Nadal was still nice look at Djokovic lmao
That Rafa clip wasn't about the line call though, it was about him losing the point despite the umpire calling out on the ball lol. The point should have been replayed
Bruh i literally defend novak all the time but he was obviously in the wrong here. He chose to not play the ball thinking it was out. They called out after the ball had already passed him so the calls did not affect him. I hope i cleared the doubts of the overzealous nole fans..
😂 don’t use logic they don’t like that
Rafa is obsessed with winning and a sore loser
what is this rafa hate lol?thats description of nole
lahyani and making up ball marks.
Who was the umpire first in clip? So many controversies with him..
Same problem at every level ; people who dedicate themselves to umpiring mean well but barring very few exceptions they are not able to see the balls as well as the players because they themselves never played that fast. Errors are bound to happen over and over until we have fully automatic rulings.
The problem is that humans cannot be 100% focused for long periods of time, so it is highly likely to make mistakes like this. Besides, like players make a lot of unforced errors per match, linesmen and umpires are also susceptible to "unforced errors".
Nothing controversial about the two Djokovic ones in Shanghai. First one, he was on the ball, chose not to hit it well before the out call came. The second one, again he chose not to hit and even used his arm to gesture that he wanted to challenge at the same time that the late out call came. Umpire did a great job!
Point is he thought they were out , then It was called out as well and he was on the ball both times. Replay the point.
most controversial call and the ref is the same, okkk so he has a problem then. He need to be better or be out the tour.
who else waited 6 days for this
The majority of these incidents occurred with Mohammad Lahiani, while he’s one of the best and most charismatic empires on tour. Weird. This part 2 is mainly about challenged calls, not bad ones like part 1. It’s not the same.
The moro
charismatic ≠ best
@@JLongTom and ≠ hence
So clay tournaments stop your pathetic egos and start to use Hawkeye 😮
I wish they would record the meetings after where the umpires show the players they are wrong. Especially after novak and Nick K freak out and verbally abuse the umpires.
Rune cheated at the French Open this year
Stop checking marks on clay. Use hawk eye and challenges instead.
Should include the one in Paris Djokovic vs Rune where challenge was allowed after rune hit the next ball out. Similar thing happened in davis cup vs Sinner too, it's funny how the rules are always bent against Novak.
Not really, plenty of examples of Novak just being wrong. There's a weird narrative of Novak against the tennis world that's getting stronger and stronger and it's just not true anymore.
@@lewisallen5849 but there are much more instances of him being unfairly treated, hindrance called out for extended grunt in Wimbledon, subjected to doping tests right before the match, charged 10,000$ for breaking a racket the list goes on. Also add to the media negativity who were not so sceptical in calling Federer the goat when he had the record.
The media situation is totally different from match rules and conduct etc. If the media prefer one person over another so be it, that's life.@@virat5828
@@lewisallen5849 thats true that umpires dont really have favourites, whats weird about that narrative though? How do you explain Australia? How do you explain 80% percent of the crowd being against him almost every match he plays. Maybe not so much in recent years, since he became the goat, but its not really whole world, just western POS
@@virat5828agree
should ATP fire all line judge and let hawk eye systems do the job? This should be much better for the players :)
Never liked rafa
Lahiani has some of the best corrections ever! What does he eat to have such good vision??
NAsal the drama queen
Mohamed Lahyani stole the show 😂
I also think that over the years, the top players received more leniency compared to lower ranked players on tour in terms of close calls going their way.
Was the umpire right in the Djokovic-Tsonga match ? Should’ve the points have been replayed ?
Yes, Ali Nili was 100% correct in the decision. It's the same reason Rafa wasn't given the point in the beginning vs Berdych. He stopped play and thereby forfeited the point should it have been in (which it was), regardless of the umpire calling it out after or the fact he returned the point
Umpire was 100% right, both times.
@@viccelito thanks for the explanation I appreciate it
@@viccelitoNadal case was very different, because he hit it back into the court, so it was a clear replay. Djokovic let it pass both times, even though he was indeed on the ball, so he forfeited both points.
@@MisterReZ no, it's the same essentially. Nadal may have returned the ball but he raised his hand to challenge before the ball was dead (aka stopped play), thus forfeiting the point. Controversial? Yes, but umpire made the right call both times
The last call in shanghai is an unbelievable joke
Both calls were good. Watch in slow motion, both times the ball is past Djokovic and then a call is made. Should have hit the ball and then wait for a call or challenge to be safe.
No, Novak was wrong both times
Tiafoe serve in perth!!!!!!!
Somehow we're almost to 2024 and still not using automatic line calls
Literally all of these are from at least 5 years ago. Some even more 10 years ago.
@@ErikCB912 ok? still not using automated line calls at many events
Rafa had a valid point against berdych, the referee called it out and berdych put it outside.
why would the point go to Berdych if he hit it out? The challenge showed it was in and Nadal stopped play.
The point should be replayed and not go to berdych.
@@Almstfam Shouldnt be replayed, nadal stopped the point and signalled a challenge. because he stopped the point he loses the point
@@pikachude5490 the judge said it was out when berdych looked at him, its pretty clear to see, nadal did not signal the challenge hi signal that it was out, you didnt see that berdych is the one who challenged? 😅
@@Almstfam berdych challenged and nadal challenged watch it again
So much terrible mistake from umpires this is crazy how blind they are sometimes
We need it even on clay too. Madrid Masters tourney has proven it can be done, and done so effectively. How ridiculous is it that this unathletic line umpire trots up to an incredibly ambiguous mark and makes a decision. TOO many close calls to leave it to human decision, WHEN WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY
Get rid of umpire and linesmen, and let players call the lines themselves. Each should still have 3 challenges per set and use them whenever they want. Having umpires doesn’t add anything to the game and it’s a waste of money.
Nah, bad idea. Just make it automatic. No reason to have players have to stop and challenge close balls in a split second decision.. You play the point until you hear a call
they are phasing out line judges in favor of fully automated line calls over the next year, but the umpire isn't only there to call lines. they're there to keep the match as fair as possible. given the egos on court, we'd be seeing more screaming matches than we would tennis matches without umpiring.
Remember that it’s not controversial when it’s a clear error… I feel like some people think ”controversial” means „wrong”.
tennis tv always choses Novak in the thumbnail only because of the word they have in title.. and try to damage his name in every possible way.....but if its good sportsmanship, beautiful moments.. we all know whose face will be there.... One day everyone will realise all about the bias treatment....
no they put him in the thumbnail because it draws views, hes one of the best in the world of course a video with him in it will get more views than if they had have put fuckin idk, berdych in the thumbnail
Stop the victim narrative around Novak, its really tiring. They put him in thumbnails because he is one of the most recognizabke players, it draws in views. Simple as that. Novak is shown many times in sportmanship videos as well, rightfully so. Its true Roger is often on the thumbnail for sportmanship videos, but it makes sense considering he's probably the most famous tennis athlete and also the most sportmanlike player by vote for numerous years. Both are great players and deserve respect, and they get it. No need to get upset over meaningless thumbnails
Victim complex.
Is it that difficult to fricken put in Hawkeye for the clay events. Like I get “sticking to tradition” but now it’s getting silly. Year after year we’re getting constant foul calls and it’s starting to make the tournament look silly 🙄🙄🙄
I love Novak but he was dead wrong here and the umpire did really good.
7:10 Джокович неправ тут. Он не собирался отбивать мяч ещё до выкрика линейного судьи👌
Novak's calls were crazy, and the referee was bad intended. He didn't hit the ball twice because the line referees called the balls out. The balls didn't pass him. Compared to other sports, referees have time to fix their mistakes but they don't do it anyway. The integration of technology is vital in tennis.
it seems to me that the call clearly came after he chose not to hit the ball on both occasions
The problem is that balls were called out. If any decision was not given, Novak would challenge the calls and he could lose the points. But in both situations, he had time to touch/hit with his racket although I agree that he is biased a bit when he approached the balls and acted as if the balls would be called out but again, he had time to hit the balls. I think in these calls, it is important to consider the player's position and whether he/she has advantages and disadvantages to hit the ball.@@lobservatoire_du_bon_sens-gout
You must be blind or deaf. He purposely let the balls go and they had both passed him before the line judges calls came. 10/10 chair umpiring, you play until the ball is dead, Novak decided to stop playing before the ball was dead
Novak's frustrations is understandable, but it seems clear to me the referee was right. Novak was on the ball both times, but decided not to play them thinking they were out, and both calls came after he could/should have struck the ball.
You are absolutely kidding yourself!
“Mr Sportmanship” award of the year. Roger F. Yeahhh right.
Rafa and Novak have both had questionable behaviour with line calls and hindrance occurrences. They always think it should benefit them when in reality they are most often wrong.
novak was right, He didn't hit the ball twice because the line referees called the balls out. The balls didn't pass him
@@stanislavsky92 False. Those were late calls; Djokovic chose to not hit the balls and would have not hit them even if they weren’t called.
That's why Djokovic never shows any sportsmanship unlike Nadal
Djokovic was wrong twice against Tsonga. He was twice on the ball and twice he didn't hit it hoping it would be out, which wasn't the case, but still pretended he had waited for the line judges to call it out, before deciding to leave it. That is so evident you almost don't need to replay the video
He didn't hit the ball twice because the line referees called the balls out. The balls didn't pass him
You are blind, men.@@stanislavsky92
@@stanislavsky92 This is untrue, you can literally see Novak deciding to not hit the ball back before the call is made. His decision to stop play was not influenced by the referee call, which was late in both cases. I understand Novak's frustration, but the referee was correct. Novak should have played on.
@@stanislavsky92You’re absolutely kidding yourself!
djokovic-tsonga is unreal, what a bad decision
no one thinks the umpire was wrong, he was clearly correct, are you the only one in the world that thinks the umpire was wrong?
am i the only one who's thinking these calls were right? both times the ball passed djoko and then goes the call "OUT"... or i missing something?
but the line umpire was awful, we have to admit that
Djokovic thought the ball was out both times and stopped play - correct decisions
@@Full0fTerr0rsDjokovic would have lost the points regardless because he let the balls go
Federer walking like a boss only to end up at no 3
Djokovic convinced linesmen to call balls out and the chairman punished him twice lol
How the fuck novak convinced linesman are u insane LOL
That's why Djokovic is just a champion and not a great champion, with this drama queen behavior..
He didn't hit the ball twice because the line referees called the balls out. The balls didn't pass him, and what do you think about rafa's behaviour, so stop crying dear fedal fan
@@stanislavsky92 Ah the classic "this happened therefore this happened" "you said something bad against djokovic therefore you are a fedal fan who thinks rafas behaviour was perfect" no. Rafa was wrong, djoko was wrong they are mutually exclusive events
@@stanislavsky92you are everywhere defending Djokovic 😉
I think you must replay the video and the slowmotion and the Comments, but It's not just that.. You see in every tournaments where Djokovic plays at least a scene where he's is unhappy cause someone hurts his feeling, Fed and Nadal don't.. He cheated cause he created a false document for playing at AO. The others players don't. He has bad temper so He wants the crowd to love him. He may be the GOAT with stats, I don't contest, but he's too drama queen to be THE goat @@stanislavsky92
Agressive djokovic wrong both times. Cant stand him
Djokovic is such a cheat, he knew very well both times that he didn't play the ball and the call came after
Nadal👎