This YouTuber Needs To Be Stopped
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 жов 2023
- FACT CHECK SHEET ►bit.ly/MogulMailCorrections
follow me on twitter ► / ludwigahgren
follow me on tiktok ► / ludwigahgren
follow me on instagram ► / ludwigahgren
join my subreddit ► / ludwigahgren
LINK TO EVERYTHING ► wlo.link/@ludwig
This Video Took 5 Takes
#mogulmail #ludwig
It’s crazy how she’s so unoriginal that she needed to ask her audience if she should go to his house instead of just doing it. Can’t even commit a crime without some direction ig
I think she meant to stop there, as a kind of "Ooo I can dox you jack haha" and then her audience goaded her to actually go through with it.
I'm not defending her, I despise her (in case anyone mistakes the sentiment in this comment)
Clout is a hell of a drug.
Also so unoriginal that she needed to ask her audience if she should get a restraining order
To add more to this, Jack's address is online. It's put up under an LLC company.
But that means she went out of her way to look for it, only to learn she was nearby, ask her fans, and pull up to his house to take a picture and post it.
if that isn't crazy idk what is. It makes it worse she went out of her way to find it. That's crazy behavior to me.
Even if it's public, posting it to a larger audience isn't a good idea.
(I do not support her by any means, I just wanted to add what I know)
maybe she should react to crimes next, so she knows what she is doing.
She thinks it's not doxxing or creepy but if someone did it to her, especially a guy, she would make a million posts about how unsafe she feels, etc. She's ridiculous and unhinged.
Not to mention that she did actually dox another woman by doing this
shames a family struggling to afford things and then doxxes people. all you need to know what kind of woman she is
@@kyokazutoJack's wife or girlgonegamer?
exactly my thoughts the whole time. if she was a man, this would never fly
And people will probably praise her because she's a woman.
Before anyone says im being sexist, im a female, okay? 👍
As a woman it was frustrating seeing her go "oh, you're just after me because I'm a woman." No, he's doing it because you're a thief. Girls who pull the "oh it's because I'm a woman" card don't realize that they are actually pulling the rug out from under other women who actually are attacked because of their gender. This is why there's a stereotype about women blaming everything that happens to them on their gender, and this is why people become dismissive when an actual victim of gender based harrassment says something like that.
This
Honestly, she can NOT be the same chromosomes as me
"oh you're after me because i'm a woman" *proceeds to doxx a youtuber and his WIFE, A WOMAN*
Yep!! Its literally the boy who cried wolf.... using the gender card for stupid bullshit just so you don't have to take responsibility
I hate women that keep doing this bruh 😭
Saying “i dont know how to dox” while actively doxing someone is hilarious. She truly believes she can “I’m just a silly little woman” her way out of this lol.
In true Coleen Bellinger way. We all know how that goes. lmao
What the f is even doxxing?
@@reaperkiss1858leaking someone's address online
@@reaperkiss1858 Doxxing: "Search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the internet, typically with malicious intent. Such as a home address, phone number, email address, or other sensitive data online."
@@reaperkiss1858releasing information of ones place of residence to the exact location the victim lives.
It’s worth noting that a large part of Jack’s campaign was alerting creators that had had their content stolen and helping them to understand their options. This lead to several creators filing copyright claims against Sniperwolf making her edit their content out of her videos. It wasn’t just harassment, he was actually helping people.
@@oxfordbosque7115in the state of California, doxxing is 100% illegal. Lmao go away
@@oxfordbosque7115The issue with what she was doing wasnt that she was reacting, it was that she wasnt giving the creators of the original videos any credit. That is why people say she is stealing content as she doesnt even make an effort to give credit, and most creators who get their content stolen dont know what action they can take against her, which is what Jack would help with
@@oxfordbosque7115its different reacting and adding anything to the video, then thats fair use. If i just reupload harry Potter, thats not fair use, if i add me watching its still not fair use. I need to react and add something for it to be fair use.
Now, sniperwolf is so predictable in her reactions that bingos can be played. So what is she adding
Also, sure she legally doesnt need to credit the creator, but its definetly the right thing to do! She is profiting of the videos, and not even crediting so the actual creator also can profit from their cool video.
@@oxfordbosque7115"On the other hand, it is as clear, that if he thus cites the most important parts of the work, with a view, not to criticize, but to supersede the use of the original work, and substitute the review for it, such a use will be deemed in law a piracy ..." This is directly from United States Code, Title 17 on fair use. It basically says that if someone copies content from someone else without criticizing or reviewing it, it's piracy. (Obviously with more nuance, but that's the TL:DR)
@@oxfordbosque7115 dumb @ss simp learn to read : "UA-cam cannot grant you the rights to use content that has already been uploaded to the site. If you wish to use someone else's UA-cam video, you may want to reach out to them directly. "
Her "lets talk like adults" picture looks like something you would recieve from the mob after failing to pay a debt
I mean she could've just messaged him on insta or something but nope, she just doxed him
"We could do this the easy way, or the hard way. It's up to you."
And her acting like it's harassment is pathetic. If she can't handle being criticized she should consider not being in the spotlight. There's a major difference between criticism and harassment
@@seventeen777 "I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse"
Makes sense, Jack is upset that she came to his house on the day of his daughter’s wedding 🤣
I love how she cyberbullied her critics, committed a literal crime, and then tried to gaslight her audience by saying “NO NO, he actually harassed *me.* I’m the victim!!!”
The sad thing is she's gotten no consequences from this as far as her job goes. Lots of people on twitter are angry, though, for what that's worth.
I think Jack has pretty cleverly operated within the confines of Fair Use for his videos. I don’t think she can claim any kind of harassment from him for his content. What he is doing is parody, but another key part of fair use we often forget is criticism which is a foundation of what he’s doing.
Well said.
Given the frequency and persistent nature of his videos, it could probably be argued to be harassment. Fair Use statutes don't absolve you of harassment charges, they absolve you of copywrite infringement charges. They're two different things altogether.
She's still a giant piece of garbage that broke the law, but that also doesn't make the harassment case any better or worse.
Remember people: if you think someone is doing something illegal to you, consult a lawyer, don't act out against them like children.
@@lyrlwestrum3971 Talking about someone on a regular basis does not equate to harassment. If that was the case, then every single commentator (not just YT content creators but sports analysts, TMZ, and other similar shows) would be classed as harassers.
No.
Parody and satire has always been classified as Fair Use
@@lyrlwestrum3971I really don’t think so. If he was going out of his way to directly say shit to her constantly, then I think it’d be harassment. But talking about someone? Can you really even say that you’re being harassed if it’s not even directed at you? The majority of his content is just him reacting to her videos and poking fun at them. I think calling that harassment is a big stretch.
She’s literally digging herself into a deeper hole. Jack and Erin are now in danger but Sniper believes she is justified in it. She’s insane.
they are not in danger. no address was actually shown, only a house photo which by itself cant allow someone to find u as a ton of houses look similar. while yeah shes for sure digging a deeper hole, its not for doxing as that hasnt been done without an address or their full name etc. house photo alone isnt enough to fall under doxing laws.
@@dastamararoseyorkrainbolt.
@@dastamararoseyorkyou really supporting her ? If you don’t know just look at er past
@@dastamararoseyork its very easy to find a house just based off the outside alone. people are legit INSANE online, they can find anything.
@@dastamararoseyorkYou’re really that naïve that you don’t believe a house can be found by an image alone? Get real.
Calling her a content creator is honestly an insult to everyone else on the platform
She's more like a content "replayer"
I just call her a UA-camr.
@@Happytravellerkimmyeven then that's a compliment
I just wanted to know why farting was trending in the U.S on ludwigs twitter
Agreed. Even content curator seems generous.
Another note that I think is really important is that Jack is not only pointing out and bringing awareness to sssniperwolf’s behaviour, but him and his team also ACTIVELY seek out the creators of the content she steals and informs and credits them.
Commenting to boost this, but to also clarify there are some freebootes she happens to react to as well, which once found out are freebooters (not that hard lol) aren't credited.
Another thing is that a lot of the creators they reach out to actually get their videos removes from snipers video and it’s easily noticeable where they cut it
Bringing up her past record is important. She clearly has not learned her lesson from being arrested TWICE for violent crimes. Its not unfair to bring it up. She has put him in danger and proved that she knows where he lives and that she is willing to physically confront him or send her insane fans after him.
If it was someone who did wholesome content all the time and can be proven that it was done out of genuine lack of knowledge, and they had no criminal history then it would be bad but not hugely problematic.
According to other commenters, she should 100% know what doxxing is because she has been a victim of it before, she has history of violent crimes, is currently undergoing a lawsuit, and she knows how unhinged her fanbase can be.
She is admittedly, a clear and present danger, maybe not of personally assaulting jack and his wife but of giving her insane fans a target to attack.
(Daily reminder that Gavin Free and Meg Turney was attacked at their house by a crazy fan of Meg (....thats how you spell it right?))
Her fans are already after him. Now, any fan of hers working at a restaurant will mess with his food, mechanics will mess with his car, neighbors will deliberately disturb him, and if any of her fans are in local gangs, his life could already be in danger. There are a lot of profoundly stupid and evil people who wont hesitate to take a swing, and they arent looking for anything more than an excuse, and justice is the last thing they care about.
The problem isn’t just that UA-cam doesn’t police it, they actively promote her and her stolen content on their socials and at their events like vidcon
I’m scared that UA-cam is going to try to defend her or her no punishment or at least a very little one because of how big she is on UA-cam
@@paperplate09 yep they defende their big youtube no matter what the fk the do, logan paul is a perfect exampel, should been perma banned after recording a dead guy and mocking him, but no he makes them cash XD
@@paperplate09 It's not impossible but she committed a crime. If YT doesn't do anything they leave themselves liable because of their policies.
Again, not impossible but their lawyers would all be having heart attacks.
If that is the case though, Jack could probably sue tf out of snipperwolf AND YT.
@@oxfordbosque7115none of what she does is covered under fair use law. I suggest you actually read up on it instead of just spouting things like you know anything.
@@venkaramon are you sure about that? perhaps you are confusing fair use laws with intellectual property rights. If a video is already in circulation on social media it is usually not copyrighted at all. Its not like a movie, you wouldn't see a social media post of an entire film being circulated over social media because this is against the law. The videos sniperwolf uses do not fall under the same laws.
As long as she does not use them maliciously, such as to incite violence, or to profit from them buy advertising a product or brand, or lie and say she made the video or falsely describe the people in the video she is not breaking the law.
She needs to be banned off the platform. She has committed a literal crime. She is a criminal.
She was a criminal before she became a UA-camr 😂 she still has a record you can pull up. And she’s UA-cam’s female poster child. Wild how corrupt companies are right?
She has been arrested twice including once for armed robbery. She is a literal criminal.
@@colton6854 so you don't have a past you Saint or nun
@@tfkdandsvkcwell, I’ve never committed a crime so yeah, I think I am a saint compared to her. But then you gotta ask yourself this. Are you yourself one?
IMO sssniperwolf is a bad person because she steals content and doxxes people, not necessarily just because she broke laws. Whether or not you committed a crime isn't the best metric to gage if you're a good or bad person, there are plenty of laws that were created with intent to target people rather than keep people safe; think marijuana possession/consumption, and there are laws that most people just don't care about that much, think speed limits. The average person knowingly or unknowingly breaks laws daily, including you and me. We're just lucky the average person also doesn't get caught. @@colton6854
I’m glad everyone is blurring the photo because apparently Jack’s wife was outside with the dog and in the photo, absolutely disgusting what Lea did 😡
You mean "criminal"?
@@SirBitesALot101why did u put quotations around criminal. what she did is actually illegal
@@shellycar84 What's wrong with putting quotations around it, It's quite obvious I said it literally even then
@@SirBitesALot101it’s hard to read tone through text and putting quotations on something usually implies sarcasm. There wasn’t anything wrong with it it was just hard to gauge intent.
@@joshuadrinkwater4391 Okay, that actually makes sense, I'll keep it in mind next time
It’s interesting to note that she didn’t doxx him until after creators started copyright claiming their videos and a slow but steady stream of clips started coming off her channel. She only did it when it affected her bottom line and small content creators started to stand up to the theft
Sort of like how she only apologized after losing her monetization for a week in what was definitely a coordinated move with youtube
The doxxing in this case is 100% illegal due to the intent. She shared a picture of Jack's house late at night, house code and everything, publicly, with the caption "let's settle this like adults." When someone says "let's settle this like adults," everyone knows that's the exact opposite of what they're gonna do. It was very clearly malicious, and the biggest indicator that it was is the fact she deleted the post shortly after. She knows what she did, and she's trying to pull the victim card like a pathetic worm.
For a woman with a record including armed robbery, I'm pretty sure her idea of being an adult is resorting to straight up violence when her main character syndrome is challenged; she's fucking insane
It's made worse by the fact she has two arrests for violent crimes. It's reasonable to assume that her intentions were violent.
@@redisthecoolestcolourwtf happened she does??
@@Tekau1 She has a 2013 arrest for armed robbery and a 2016 arrest for disorderly conduct as they suspected she assaulted her partner
her sister made it worse by confirming they were there to harm him by saying something along the lines of "What, he doesn't know how to fight?"
The one thing I think you forgot to mention is that Jack’s passion to point a light at her behavior has made a difference. Tiktok creators who weren’t aware of what she was doing were able to make copyright claims on videos that wrongfully featured their videos (without permission or credit). UA-cam hasn’t taken action, but the SSSniperwolf team HAS been forced to. Videos that were previously over 10 minutes are now more like 9 and a half, and videos that just barely passed the 8 minute threshold to be eligible for Adsense are now under 8 minutes. Her team has had to edit out and remove these things to try and save themselves from proof of copyright claims (which is downright disgusting that they’re manipulating the system to try and save face) and her channel is taking massive blows because she’s finally being held accountable. That’s one thing she won’t mention publicly but is almost certainly why she stalked him
She's fkn psychotic
This 100% jack is actually making a difference and helping tiny creators have the confidence to fight for their content being used without permission.
I'm also not sure why Ludwig is acting like it was his idea for UA-cam to add the option for creators to profit-share videos reacting to their content
I am so proud of this community
This is something that really needs to be pointed out. The fact her team has actually had to remove clips that then leads to some going under the 8 minute mark probably plays a big part in her escalating the situation.
making an innocent woman (jack's wife) feel unsafe in her own home is never okay. by attacking and showing his home she also put his family (who has nothing to do with anything) at risk.
“Fair play harass her” 9:39 full stop NO that is not harassment… showing up at a house unannounced is harassment
Having played the bingo game, the level of stealing she does is horrifying. You have people contacting Jack to say their content was stolen, or even that their underage siblings have had their content stolen. Every stream, Jack does a big shoutout to any of the watermarks he can find that haven’t been cropped out, and always puts the links to those creators in the description of his vids. Sniperwolf can’t even do that.
@@wp912 not all the videos are
@@wp912 sssniperwolf barely reacts to things. she says stuff like “bro did this this and this” or she mutes the sound of the original video so she can steal the joke. she barely adds anything and it’s gotten so bad to the point that ppl can predict her reactions. reactionary content must be transformative in some way for it to fall under the fair use category.
also, sssniperwolf barely credits the creators, meaning the original source/uploader doesn’t get any credit.
that's where you're wrong @wp912. her content is not transformative enough to be considered fair use.
@@wp912 I think you’re confusing “transformative” with “informative”. Transformative means they have to add to the content they are taking.
For example, a remix might only have vocals from a song but the vocals are edited and the instrumental is completely new. That’s transformative. It’s changing the original content.
Sniperwolf takes videos, and reads the on screen text out load, then describes the video like the audience is blind. Sometimes she doesn’t even react AT ALL! There’s times when she’s literally not on the screen while a video is playing. That is NOT transformative.
well the thing is she's exploiting this and making money off of stealing content from creators, most who don't want their content to be stolen. and youtube is promoting the stealing of content that she does. While other creators are working hard making content.
This is best described by @ShaheerS2, who says, 3) This all started because youtube where does sniperwolf get her content? her fans~! and named her one of the best creators on the platform. This was incredibly triggering for creators all over the platform since even her fans know she steals content and hasn't gotten any original content on her channel. How is YT promoting this trash on people? That is what Jack has been trying to reach out to YT for the better part of a year.
Lots of the time, sniperwolf also gets more attention and views that the original creator by adding nearly nothing, which is really aggravating for many youtubers who try so hard
If UA-cam doesn’t take action then they failed all of us on this platform. Hopefully she doesn’t get away with it because she is a big content creator.
she should be in jjjjail
do you think youtube care about this
@@trumpputinkim Yo, If you are going to use alt's to promote your yt, at least wait a few extra minutes and not like post the comment instantly saying you "checked out the channel" when it says it was posted the same minute as the original comment and then a minute later another one. Otherwise it's really obvious. Cheers.
Edit: He removed the two comments from the alts, they were talking about the channel JokeswithMitochondria (the first reply on the original comment). If he made later comments then it's again his alts, don't be fooled
Idk about this, as much as I hate her
UA-cam should not take action on this because they hold no power in this, if the case was she doxxed him on UA-cam then I'm going to be ok, but in this case is Instagram platform, big tech company should not hold too much power to control people right
what next ? UA-cam banned you because you get into a fight with some guys on the street and get arrested ?
The only way to get youtube to care would be for regulators to hammer down hard on them. Actively promoting creators after they do something like this should at the very least be a no go.
She didn’t even ask her fans “should I dox this dude” she asked “should I visit him?” And then literally posted the photo to her ig. There’s no way she didn’t do this on purpose.
theres only one thing worse than a bad apology: *no apology*
You go make her apologise then? She will fly kick you in the face!
@@spiderbellywildnails Good, that's another crime she can get arrested for
Don’t worry guys, she made an apology that definitely either written by chat gpt or a or agent and she is clearly not sorry
I mean, the good thing is the further Sniper goes with this crap, the quicker it will all be over for her.
wow a verified creator
stolen acc weird
we can only hope. She seems to be youtube's favorite "creator".
UPDATE: They demonetised her (temporarily)
nah, shes a women and wealthy.
Important thing to mention that Jack never critized her personality and past controversies but focused on her recent actions of not crediting the creators.
And specifically her non transformative content, which isn't her personally, but how she runs her channel
and he helps the actual creators in her videos when ever he can
13:12 I love that Ludwig, in the middle of all this chaos, still has empathy for the social media manager of YT's Twitter account.
This woman should be de-platformed and put behind bars
Jacksfilms: Proves she steals content, proves she steals their jokes, shows people don’t like her using their clips & asking for removal, and proves she isn’t a true react channel while Jacksfilms transformed her lazy content into BINGO to engage with his audience, see the progress of justice for the creators, spread the word, and good ol’ have fun.
SniperNoSniping: Doesn’t want to put people’s links in the description below, react, take consequences of actions, just wants to make money… She knows Jacksfilms is pulling the rug underneath her feet and can show people the truth, that is why she is scared using doxxing tactics & bullying / name calling to finish her selfish agendas.
I also love that Jack tries to shout out the original creators when he can.
@@Freakinout14
Exactly and he STANDS UP for them, even giving words of encouragement to battle her & copyright strike her for their content back! That is awesome!
feet🤤
Both of them are clout chasers.
@@ic4192
How is Jacksfilms a clout chaser for standing up for the community, actually talking to those whose content was taken / approve of Jacksfilms, and continuing to stand up for UA-camrs’ content against LAZY “react” channels that steal their videos in their whole uncut entirety?
Answer: He isn’t.
P.S. I love react channels when they actually add something to the discussion, react with real emotion, and contribute something with actual merit / interpretation. XQC Does Not! SS Does Not!
Another portion of the story that you missed is that just before the doxxing happened, and likely the reason she even doxxed in the first place, is that there were a handful of creators that Jacksfilms interviewed that ended up successfully striking some of her videos. In the interviews, Jack brings up the current youtube video and you can see hard cuts where she edited out the video to remove the content/striked material. After this, there were so many content creators initiating strikes against videos that there was an 11 minute video of tik tok clips that got shortened down to around 8 minutes. Jack has been a driving force for change, and it has reached a point where it's inconveniencing her enough to dox him.
This should be pinned because this is the most important part of the entire situation
I'm adding that I counted more then 10 copyright strikes as of now, and youtube insted of banning her, gave her the possibility to cut out the specific parts.
YT also wrote to the creators giving her this strikes and asked a bunch of personal info to confirm their identity.
2 years ago a troll gave 12 copyright strikes to a friend and youtube refused to remove them, even after providing all the proofs. As of now he still can't create another channel
@@42isTh3Answ3r I don't think YT directly wrote to them. If I understand correctly, the system works like this inherently: you have to doxx yourself (as the person you're trying to strike receives the information provided) in order to file a strike in the first place. YT does want you to provide that data but not as an 'extra step' to confirm you really are who you are, but as an obligatory step in order to even initiate the process.
@@Daltoniss nope, you usually have to provide all those info when you have to counter a strike that you received, but to give a strike you have to provide almost nothing, that's why trolls can give fake strike so easly.
You can see in jack's video the message they received a couple of days after they filed the strike, it's not a normal procedure, he had to log in his tik tok account to confirm he was the owner.
YT never does this for normal channels
Jack D. Films
It's not harassment if you can avoid it by just blocking him on twitter. He isn't directing thousands of people to her twitter, he specifically said in one of his streams that he doesn't want people mass reporting her videos or flagging them on behalf of someone they've never even spoken to, he isn't E-Mailing her a link to his streams or anything like that.
Mockery ≠ Harassment
Hes is definitely not harassing her. She STEALS peoples content and doesnt even credit them!
He actually made it bearable to watch her content by memeing how repetitive she is. She's repetitive to the point that you can expect her to say the same words and phrases and complete a bingo card out of it. The man is using big brain to fight a content thief that youtube wont take down. If what he's doing is harassment, what shes doing is harassment.
Holy crap she is insane. Also, remember when she falsely accussed a guy of being a registered sex offender and doxxed him? Yeah, she did that.
EnigmaHood is the guy's channel if anyone's curious. She also had (I believe, correct me if I'm wrong) a friend impersonate the guy using his real name and address to make a post about being a registered sex offender. Talk about SSSlimy behavior
Was he able to get his name cleared or is he still seen as a offender?
@@wolf-fangI want to know as well!
@@orpheus4694I mean if she got away with THAT, then she would probably get away with this too
@@hell1942I don't think so, Enigma is a much smaller youtuber, Jack has been on this platform for 17 years and is relatively well known. Hopefully this is too big of a thing for it to be swept under the rug.
I think it's important to point out that Jack was really helping out smaller creators who really didn't have the options or the support to get their videos removed from her channel. Because of him streaming this and making these videos, he's had his safety and livelihood threatened
Yeah I think in just one stream he had three or four people come forward about having their content stolen. I also thought it was kinda bizarre when Lud was making the "jjjacksfilms could be harassment" argument. I get it was a bit of a devils advocate thing but jack is actively providing much more transformative reaction content that promotes the creators sssniperwolf ignores or edits out, and helps the people she's stolen from. He also hasn't brigaded or anything like that and has just been laughing at her braindead "reactions" with his chat on a channel that isnt even his main one.
@@proto6948 I do think this was partly because lud is just not that informed on the topic, but I appreciate him covering it for a larger audience to see.
@@dzintars8034 that's totally fair
It's harassment, plain and simple.
@@proto6948 I've been wondering if it could be considered harassment or not within UA-cam's guidelines or at least the company's perspective for some time now. Ever since Leafy got obliterated due to doing something similar on paper, it's at least not a stretch of the imagination to consider that it could happen to Jack, too. To anyone with more than half a brain, it's obviously far different from the Leafy situation but I can't honestly sit here and think that Jack's channels are safe with UA-cam as the Judge, Jury, and Executioner.
People need to experience actual harassment, bullying, and gaslighting because these word get used way too casually. Girl is crying about criticism, not harassment.
& pulling out the classic because I’m a woman card
@@KillJoy78I still can’t get over her stupid “nOboDy ATacKS tHe MaLE ReACt ChaNNeLs” yes they absolutely jackfilms himself has made fun of multiple male react channels in his past
Keep pushing UA-cam to punish her, everyone. We have to keep the pressure until the corporations listen that this is unacceptable.
one of the things that Jack listed as a motivator of why he was so passionate about this is that UA-cam encourages content like this, they literally tweeted about her success and when Jack called them out on it she called him bald and accused him of being sexist (you know, cause Lia's such a girls girl, she cares so much about the unfair treatment of her fellow female creators cough cough) that's what lead him into doing this. she can claim he's harassing her, but at the end of the day she jumped to doxing him and his family, who knows how many delusional fans she has who might decide to go after them, I wouldn't be surprised if he got swatted because of this. it's really disgusting behavior, Lia tries to play dumb but she's got a history of this kind of behavior so I hope no one's falling for it.
Just because someone isn't a huge feminist doesn't mean she can't be the target of misogyny.... a woman who's a misogynist can also be harassed.... you don't sound very intelligent... but let me give you a very very very simple point... both can be shit humans... you targetting her and defending him screams of internalised misogyny... which you will of course deny.... but maybe spend a few second reflecting on it before you do
@xahani1287 brother you must come up from that dark place and stop kissing her shoe.
@@tfkdandsvkc Jack built a career on parody and sketches, and he has only called out 1 creator like sssniperwolf in the past.
a vast majority of sssniperwolf's content is react content, which ludwig explains is quite shameless, and she is milking the work of other creators. MrBeast's main channel is filled with genuine projects that he creates every day, pewdiepie has so much more than stealing content not only now but in the past, but sssniperwolf has shown that the only skill she has with youtube is stealing other videos. Both of your examples definitely do react content, but that itself is not the issue. The issue is reacting being the ONLY thing you do, which is what make sssniperwolf far worse than most channels on the platform.
UA-cam refuses to do anything about because theyre a bloated useless company, with thousands of employees who collect income and do nothing, so Jack is taking it upon himself to attempt to shame sssniperwolf out of doing this vast amount of react content. React content is fine, but she is not doing it correctly, and is using a horrendous loophole to make money off of other people with minimal effort.
Another comment here also highlights why what Jack is doing is far better for the community than youre making it out to be:
"it’s worth noting that a large part of Jack’s campaign was alerting creators that had had their content stolen and helping them to understand their options. This lead to several creators filing copyright claims against Sniperwolf making her edit their content out of her videos. It wasn’t just harassment, he was actually helping people." - @petrichor9604
@@tfkdandsvkc ur crazy wtf
@@tfkdandsvkc Ya know the difference between other reactors to sssniperwolf? They're actually reacting and putting funny or articulate commentary on the videos. They're actually entertaining to watch. Sssniperwolf's react content has no substance whatsoever that you just end up watching the video she was reacting to rather than watching her reaction. Basically like watching a funny video but there's a fly flying around your ear making annoying sounds.
Crazy that she couldn't even do such a simple thing like crediting the creators, like its not even that hard, it takes 0 effort to do, but her ego is more massive than her entire UA-cam's channel existence
even worse, when you use someone elses tiktok, in the side theres a tiny username, and she even cuts those out of the frame
Crediting the creators does nothing to help her legally against fair use. She is taking the video in it's entirety and reuploading it for her own personal gain. If you look up the 4 pillars of fair use they are either non applicable or strictly fights what she is doing. The only reason to credit the creators is to cover her ass. The problem being as JacksFilms has discussed, she steals their content. So all crediting the creator would do is allow them to be notified of theft and then in return report her of stealing their content
@@boneless70and if there are jokes at the top of the video, she'll cut it out and pretend she came up with it. you'd think she only did this once or twice, but it's so fucking funny how many times she's done it because she can't come up with anything that she has to steal the joke at the top of the video, or at the end of the video
It’s crazy how she’ll put 0 effort into her videos but then puts all the effort in doxxing Jack-
@@bee.2392 the best part is she didnt even exert the effort to doxx jack, she just did it cause she happened to be 5 mins away 💀
What’s being lost with folks trying to cover this is Jack has been shouting out the creators she hasn’t been and that’s one of the main reasons he keeps doing this. What the chat has been doing is finding the original creators to bring into his chat and he’s helping them get control back of their content. What’s happening in the process is Lia is having to remove the clips she gets flagged for and that’s a great thing. Jacks got a great sense of humor and he’s doing good work.
What’s even better is that cuts of the removed videos are very noticeable so his work is clearly having an effect on her content as well as the fact that a couple videos have been removed entirely because of creators rising up
I seriously appreciate you giving SSSniperwolf what little credit she had until doxing. Not because I think she "deserves it", but because it makes your reporting of the story much more complete and neutral.
The worst part of the current doxxing thing is that a few years ago she was doxxed. I know that because I remember my little cousin being a huge fan of her and being absolutely furious people would do this to her. She knows what it's like to be doxxed. She knows the fear of thinking someone's in her house. She knows things like that, and still doxxed a man who was innocent. It is absolutely crazy to me how she possibly thinks that what she's done is okay and the fact that she is victimizing herself is actually insane.
dang this and her actual criminal record are such damning pieces of information
@@Pixiestix136 bro?!She has a criminal record too? 💀
@@isaburntcake theft and fighting iirc. she's also getting sued i believe
But remember she said, “I have no idea how to Dox.”
She can’t even play the victim card right.
@@the-postal-dudearmed robbery, specifically
Little reminder that more than 10 people filed copyright strike on the content she stole, yt contacted them and asked all of their personal info to confirm their identity and gave her the ability to cut the specific segments from her videos.
If my channel gets 3 copyright strikes, my channel gets deleted and I can't create other channels.
Omg this is a great point that I haven’t heard anyone bring up. She’s getting copyright claimed right and left but nothing has happened to her channel. That’s wild
Yeah but you aren’t bringing in the big bucks like she is. Gotta protect the cash cows.
@@MeeraReads not copiright claims, she got copiright strikes.
As of YT Term of Service a strike takes down the video, and with 3 the channel and the YT account are gone forever.
Not only they are letting her keep the videos up, by only cutting the specific segments, but she already got more than 3 strikes.
@@ChannelCreator I never seen even big big creator get this level of ToS bending.
Not even PewDiePie pre "drama" got away with copiright strike
"Lets talk like adults" -reasonable statement in DMs when you have beef w/ someone, horror movie statement when posted on a public forum
14:08 watching a youtuber react to a youtuber reacting to a youtuber reacting
enough internet for today
It is important to note that Jack does this mainly to credit the creators. He and the whole stream will find the TikTok’s to then promote them . I feel like this is an important thing you should have added in
Very important but not even Penguinzo mention it in his video
@@cristeto96 Which is a shame honestly. It is a critical point on his behaviour towards that crazy SSStalkerWolf. He's not harassing her he's criticising her content not her person. There's a difference.
Listen Penguinzo,pewidiepie, mrbeast reacts,Sunnyv2,sidemen reacts and a billion more UA-cam channels have been doing react content it's not going away it's here to stay,,,what is worse is creating hate content which jackfilms is profiting from that is a serious UA-cam violation that needs to be addressed
@xahani1287 ur right, tons of big creators are doing shitty content. however, its rly not hate content tho, its pointing out the blatant boring ass videos lia makes that not only genrate an absurd amount of profit without minimal amounts of transformation content (which is not fair use, and illegal), aswell as working to profit off of the creators featured in those videos who rarely get credited properly. lia doesnt care abt the creators, she is essentially a content farm atp. and now she is no longer just a shitty content creator, shes threatening other channels, shes doxxing her opposition. jack is giving more power to the non/smaller content creators. lia is immature, unablr to take any critism, and acting extremely dangerously. if she gets penalized, it will set a legal precedent, and perhaps other big low effort creators will step up more. (btw im not tryna fight, im just yapping)
@@tfkdandsvkc We're not denying that UA-cam has to address react content once and for all, but if Jack has to take his videos down (even though his content is transformative unlike hers), so will SniperWolf.
Few things lud missed in his research:
1) Jack has called out many male youtubers in the past. Not one, but several. This includes leafy and rwj and many others. SW is just using the feminist/victim card.
2) JJJackfilms bingo really showed how awful her reactions were. She would never credit the tiktoks she stole and actively going out of her way to remove the credit. She would either summarize the video or say the same things the video said. She has reused the same clips, not in different videos, the same video to increase run time. She has even just "forgotten" to react - she literally did not even include her face cam for some of them and literally played tiktoks in the entirety without her facecam. Thats not even reacting, thats just straight up stealing no questions asked.
3) This all started because youtube where does sniperwolf get her content? her fans~! and named her one of the best creators on the platform. This was incredibly triggering for creators all over the platform since even her fans know she steals content and hasn't gotten any original content on her channel. How is YT promoting this trash on people? That is what Jack has been trying to reach out to YT for the better part of a year.
i don't think it's fair to call it the feminist card when sniperwolf has a history of hating / making fun of other women lmao
I am sad Ludwig missed the points with this one.
Creative commons laws are not the same as intellectual property rights. Sniperwolf is not breaking the law. Besides her videos are intended for entertainment purposes not educational
Ludwig is just as guilty as her in terms of reacting to tiktoks.
I think theres levels to what is considered added commentary.@@sean2mush
Hold up. 12:03 the funniest thing is that she is subscribed to him!!!
In case anyone was wondering and is lazy, here is the legal definition of harassment per. CA law:
In general, civil harassment is abuse, threats of abuse, stalking, sexual assault, or serious harassment by someone you have not dated and do NOT have a close family relationship with, like a neighbor, a roommate, or a friend (that you have never dated). It is also civil harassment if the abuse is from a family member that is not included in the list under domestic violence. So, for example, if the abuse is from an uncle or aunt, a niece or nephew, or a cousin, it is considered civil harassment and NOT domestic violence.
The civil harassment laws say “harassment” is:
Unlawful violence, like assault or battery or stalking, OR
A credible threat of violence, AND
The violence or threats seriously scare, annoy, or harass someone and there is no valid reason for it.
ALSO:
What is “harassment” under California law?
The following amounts to “harassment” under California law:
Assault (intentionally attempting to cause harmful or offensive contact)
Example: Someone swings a fist at you, or throws an object at you, with the intention of hitting you, but miss.
Battery (intentional harmful or offensive contact)
Example: Someone swings a fist at you, or throws an object at you, with the intention of hitting you, and they are successful.
Stalking (a series of repeated actions that are meant to put you in fear for your safety, or the safety of your immediate family)*
Example: Someone continually follows you, watches you, makes repeated and unwanted contact with you (via internet, email, phone, fax or other methods of communication), with the purpose of making you feel scared.
Credible threat of violence (a statement or action that reasonably place you in fear for your safety, or the safety of your immediate family)
Example: “If you ever call the cops on me again I’m going to kill you”
Repeated actions that seriously alarm, annoy, or harass you, that serve no legitimate purpose and cause you extreme emotional distress.**
Example: Getting 50 unwanted and upsetting text messages, emails and/or phone calls from the same person within a week for no reason.
----‐-------------
Again, this is per. CA government court webpage. Feel free to form an opinion.
My only opinion is that this comment is underrated.
@Abyssmouse appreciate that.
Not even children stans can defend her after this fact
Extra very important context; Jack (and many of his twitch viewers) have been alerting creators that they can copyright claim (may be the wrong term i'm not sure) their videos and get them taken out of her videos, and they have. To the point that she's deleted entire videos of hers because they end up getting cut under the 8 minute mark and she can't get that midroll in. She didn't REALLY care about him shit talking her until it affected her wallet. THAT'S what has her so angry, desperate, and quite frankly, dangerous. I've seen multiple videos covering this situation and nobody has mentioned that, even though, in my opinion, it's the most important part.
This. Always follow the money. The power to end these criticisms by CREDITING THE ORIGINAL CREATORS was constantly in her reach, it was not necessary to drive over to his house. It really seems like she was just pissed off, petty and vengeful. She needs to face consequences.
+
THANK YOU FOR MENTIONING THIS! I was scrolling trying to find someone who could say it better than I would be able to. This is such important information.
this & her criminal record and the fact she herself as been doxxed before and know what it’s like
@@Pixiestix136 She’s been doxxed?! (I don’t follow her at all) That would immediately be evidence that she knew what she was doing….i can’t imagine a court ignoring that fact so she really shot herself in the foot on this one, if he presses charges.
Anyone that legitimately thinks Jack is harrassing Lia by criticizing her largely illegal actions that she publicizes on one of the biggest youtube channels on the platform baffles me. There's targetted action but not after her safety or even her career if you think about it. He highlights when she does admirable things in the reactions like giving actual insight, acknowledging when she actually gives credit, disproves baseless conspiracy theories painting her in a worse light, and discourages false copyright flagging and mass reporting. There's no intimidation here, he simply sees somebody exploiting other people and calls it out.
And also, under Californian state law, the closest definition of harassment that Jack matches is "repeated actions that seriously alarm, annoy, or harass you, that serve no legitimate purpose and cause you extreme emotional distress." And I'd argue the main purpose is to inform people of their rights to their content and of their options to enforce their copyright protection through UA-cam's own tools that they themselves promote. Not to attack her due to some vendetta. That's what Lia did with, you know, DOXXING HIS HOUSE.
Get this comment pinned
it's in no way illegal what she does.... i know law is a difficult subject... but it would only be illegal to steal someone's content when they claim it was stolen and a JUDGE decides it was.... until then it is absolutely okay to do so.... morally it's very different.... and i'd argue it's the laziest and stupidest form of entertainment and i don't get why people watch it... but unless the creators of those clips sue her she's legally not doing anything wrong
@@LoFiAxolotlmy man's that's like saying, if you commit a murder and no one presses charges, you didn't do anything illegal. She's stealing content.
@@LoFiAxolotl not being punished is not the same as not committing a crime but you got the spirit ig
@@LoFiAxolotlWow, you must believe that Casey Anthony is a victim.
Sniperwolf also never credits the tiktoks in her videos, going as far as to crop the videos she uses. One of the main things jacksfilms did was try and credit the creator of the tiktok and link their tiktok in the description of the videos. He would also offer advice too and support anyone who had had their content stolen so they could get their videos cut from sniperwolfs channel. He was doing God's work and I hope him and his family make it out of this safely and that UA-cam takes action against sniperwolf for committing a literal crime.
The fact that PsychoWolf's fanbase is completely okay with everything that happened and see literal doxxing as nothing more than a fun Saturday activity is all the reason that UA-cam needs to deplatform her.
Oh? Forgetting that the majority who r still supportive of her needs an urgent brain surgery for having rotten morals?
She's been having to remove a ton of content due to creators rightfully claiming their work in her videos. Feels like shes been rattled for once and this is her response.
well, she's also "allegedly" being sued by the guy who wrote and filmed her content for years, if it weren't for jack, i don't feel like anyone would even be paying attention, she could pull a whole joey salads if she just went about it different, but she can't help herself, she'd have to put effort in and i just don't think she ever learned how
Im really glad a lot of big youtubers are on jacks side. Shes literally going to taste reality hard. Jack was never harassing her. He was giving credit to all of her stolen videos from the ORIGINAL creators. He dealt a big blow to her ego, content and profit.
How? How is he giving credit to the original creators? And how does he/we know it was the original creator and not just a repost from else where?
@@XoogwayXLinks in descriptions, tracking down originals
@@Veltek_ It seems like he didn't start linking till he linked the card game. She has creators handels from tiktok in her reactions. Sometimes they are there and sometimes they get cropped out. She does what other creators do when they do reaction videos. Making a channel targeting just her over this doesn't make sense. I just don't get it. Why.
@@XoogwayXBecause the entire community has hated her for years and this is the culmination of that. She is a horrendous person.
UA-cam itself platforms her, Jack took notice and has been criticizing her reaction content since then. It isn't hard to make a link in the video description for creators featured in your video, so why not do that? What else doesn't make sense?
He says that all Jack does is just shame her into not doing reacting. His goal is to alert creators that their content is stolen (the free space on bingo is her not creditting, so she doesn't credit very often). As a person who has been watching ever since the bingo video came out, I can say for sure that there is good will behind this movement; credit the creators who she literally earns millions of dollars from. This rivalry always seemed one sided, as sssniperwolf was always the one starting things on twitter and now instagram, and he just responds rationally if at all, but all the surface level people seeing this doxxing now just see the many videos about sssniperwolf and just chalk it up to obsession, creepy, weird, or even harassment as seen in this video and others.
Jack is a guy trying to change UA-cam for the better in any rational way he can, and he's not going to stop because sssniperwolf isn't going to stop making "reaction" videos, not crediting creators, and now BREAKING THE LAW.
I'm just glad people can agree that breaking the law is a big no-no.
Edit: I'm glad Mogul Mail provided the video of Jack explaining why he continues to do this.
After this experience and seeing people's interpretations of this event, I will try my hardest to just do a bit of research before making opinions and sharing them online, as the amount of people oblivious to why he's doing this is insane.
Wow I didn't expect to try to convince and clarify what is happening to people today, but here I am, trying my best to tell people that it isn't that hard to research.
Dude I mostly know you from Melee so randomly stumbling upon this well executed video and seeing your name in the description was trippy, haha! Had no idea you churned out bangers like this.
One more bit of context: beyond using shame, Jack has been telling people to use UA-cam's tools to claim monetization from her videos or to get their content removed from her videos if they don't approve of the way their content is being used. It's gotten to the point where some of her videos had to become shorter than 8 minutes or to be deleted altogether. I'd imagine that's a big part of why we're here now.
It’s funny she knows the word “defamation” but can’t be bothered to look up the meaning of doxxing.
She only knows the meaning of words that don't incriminate her
She also called something blackmail when it was actually bribery, so she's honestly not that smart lol
@@kyuuchat I mean, I was under no illusions that she was smart. Considering her past legal troubles involving abuse and assault (if I’m not mistaken), it would probably do her some good to get familiar with some legal terms, as she could be in hot water again soon.
Careful, Ms. Gworl might say "you're next" and doxx anyone who starts criticizing her fairly 💀
I always appreciate your rundown of the drama.
Apparently, she stood there outside their house, waiting for him to come out to pick food (and she somehow knew it was ice cream). She's insane. I hope she gets punished for this by youtube and authorities.
I heard she was the one that ordered the food, to try and lure him outside. psychotic behaviour
@@megs_4458 Wait what for real?? How is she not in jail yet💀
That’s actually scary. I wonder if she had any violent intentions if she was just waiting for Jacksfilms to go outside.
where did you hear that?
@@egg1181Jack's wife stated that food was delivered to the house and they didn't order it. She's thinks sssniperwolf or her team ordered it to attempt to lure them out of the house.
The problem is her audience is mostly kids, who either dont care that she did this, or would never know that she did this. She'll never lose her views or subscribers and she'll probably never face consequences for her unhinged bordering on criminal actions.
she was removed from GFuel's sponsor page recently, at least, and given that their fridge is shown off in the background of all her videos, may very well be a decent financial blow. here's to hopin'
Those defenders are simp/and women-flagger actually.
@@mothmanatee2326 Depend, there is a lawsuit between Sssniperwolf and Sausage (her ex-husband or ex-boyfriend) and one of Sausage's accusation is she (Sssniperwolf) make deal with G-Fuel without his knowledge, beside been outside of some new channels and etc... So G-Fuel could have cancel the agreement to evict to become involve in this case.
Atozy, Oompaville and Madcatster are the one focus on this lawsuit happen. I recommend Madcatster he give good comments about lawsuits.
Hopefully UA-cam deletes her channel. Only so long before she fucks up again if they don’t now tho…
Where are the farts, fartman
3:49 how the f did he picked a random video and random part and there is already an editing mistake
This video keeps getting better
Important point you missed - original creators are starting to make copyright claims for their content that she’s stolen (thanks to Jack’s encouragement) and they’re starting to be successful. This has lead to her videos becoming shorter after the clips are removed, and because she makes her videos all just a tiny bit longer than 8min for the ads, it’s starting to affect her $$
It’s probably the reason for the doxing as well
It's a detail worth mentioning that, through Jack's campaign, he has been able to help some of the creators she steals from claim their content and force her to edit them out or remove her video entirely. Which is hype, but also likely contributes to why things are escalating now specifically.
Oh shit also important to note is that the videos don't get "claimed." UA-cam's intentionally giving her the opportunity to act-edit or take down her videos-before the claim processes so that the creators STILL don't get credit or justice. So it's progress, but still very much a systematic issue.
@@xelatronic Makes sense since she's farming views from blissfully ignorant people and that's easy ad rev for UA-cam.
No shit Sherlock.
A lot of people also didn’t even know she had stolen their content until jack posted it bc a lot of adults don’t watch her stupid videos.
But his campaign has been so hateful look at all the haters celebrating sssniperwolf pain why is he so bothered making reaction content while half of youtube is full of reaction content creators????
Love how the one time she's puts effort into something is doxxing Jack, not visiting her fan that had cancer, not giving people proper credit. Like her priorities are all the way messed up.
Yap its wild how she goes to a dude and his wife's house to threaten/intimidate them but not visit a dying kid
To be fair tho, it was really rude of that girl to die of her terminal illness, instead of waiting indefinitely.
All it would have taken to make a child happy is jumping on face time for 5 minutes. So simple.
But, no, that’s not the kind of person sniperwolf is.
I would love to see an update to this because UA-cam is saying "Sssniperwolf is making us too much money so we're not gonna enforce rules"
Untill this gets traction outside of youtube i doubt anything is gonna happen
You know, her reacting to these videos and explaining her frustration is PROBABLY the closest thing we'll get to transformative content from her.
If you don't like her content stop watching why the fuck are you so bothered with her??? Why can't you address other reactors like sidemen reacts and mrbeast reacts half of UA-cam has reaction creators get used to it!!!
go ahead and mark “actual insight” on your bingo cards, thats a rare one.
@@greasyweeb bbbingo reference
The reason why jacksfilms went after her is not just because of her content, its because she never credited and barely mentioned the creators and made millions doing so
and also because she is endorsed for her channel by youtube as an achievement
when the entire thing is scripted tiktok re-reading
@@alexo_pog and what is wrong with that if you don't like her no need to hate her to the level of sabotaging her?? Plus reaction content is very versatile it may not be your taste but it doesn't mean you have any right to destroy her career
@@tfkdandsvkcSweetheart if asking for accountability feels like sabotaging to you that means you fucked up big time
@@tfkdandsvkci like how apparently criticism is now hating and sabotaging
can you tell me whats being sabotaged? really, what is jacksfilms doing that is sabotaging
@@d1n9y sweetheart hate content is not content promoting hate and bullying sssniperwolf is against UA-cam guidelines let people who enjoy her content continue enjoying without you bitter haters being so miserable about it!!
Whats funny is that she could have easily let the drama blow over. Instead she went nuclear mode and now everyone’s eyes are on her
Sssssssnipey out here literally being Ghostface in Scream. “Do you like scary movies, Jack?”
I’ll bet my life savings that YT refuses to demonetize her.
Yup
Send in a complaint to YT anyway. Dangerous behavior cannot go undocumented or it will continue.
aye but she bad tho so we gonna let it slide
Maybe things will be done, Susan was a coward and never did anything, maybe this new CEO will
UA-cam is too afraid to be seen as "choosing sides" and will like do nothing. That's what happened with QuantumTV
I would just like to add another reason why she’s so upset: What he’s doing is working! The creators she steals from are filing claims to UA-cam and instead of getting a strike, she removes the clips in question! She’s getting backed into a corner and doesn’t like that he’s winning. I was there during his live stream last night when it happened, and it was absolutely chilling to hear that she was outside his house while it was happening. It’s bizarre that there’s people defending her still.
Very true! She's getting her stolen content claimed, so she has to edit it out of her videos now. And hows she gona post content if she cant steal it?
UA-cam? what are you going to do about this!? Jacksfilms needs to take legal action.
I think the more this blows up, the better it is in the long run. Hopefully this brings awareness to the large issue of content theft for creators on many social platforms.
The fact youtube hasn't done anything is simultaneously INSANE and also very expected.
Yet. Haven't done anything, yet. There's still time.
if she said there was only 2 genders she would've been banned already (because of course youtube "cares about our safety").
@@retchedI don’t believe in UA-cam tbh they suck at taking action, all they care about is money
@@laia444 Oh I don't. I wouldn't be surprised if they astroturf this away.
@@laia444 and they know everyone will still come to their site... even when we know they're unethical... i'm guilty as well... regardless of their action/inaction, they're not gonna lose any significant amount of traffic... more than likely this will be more or less forgotten in a month or so... that's what they're banking on
It's been said in these comments before, but Jack's goal isn't to harass Sssniperwolf off the platform, its to pressure her to literally just credit the people she's stealing from. He's made that point many times
I mean I didn't know either of them before this but have thought the guy was am obsessed wierdo for months having his videos in my feed. Finding out she sucks even more than he does doesn't improve my opinion of him at all.
Not just that, but he just wants her to actually try with her reactions. There's a reason he originally started it by grading her reactions.
@@patrickmcpartland1398I had heard of him before this incident but never watched his channel before. I actually really like his content. You should check out his non sssniperwolf related videos. There’s 17 years worth of it
people like the first commenter are why I try to clarify things. People happen to see the surface, but don't take a look underneath before making an opinion, which is normal.
What isn't normal is to keep that opinion without actually making an effort to understand things.
He's doing good things to try to improve this platform called UA-cam. It's not that hard to prove either if you don't trust me.
ok but it should. you get that changing your opinion to accommodate facts is a good thing, right? @@patrickmcpartland1398
UA-cam shouldn’t be letting sssniperwolfs actions go pass them just because of her popularity
As a fellow bokuto lover, I completely agree!
10:55 Ludwig half covering up his lazy react content. Love it!
Not really covering it up since he has admitted to his old react content, but at least he gave actual transformative value to all his react content
"I just want to talk like adults" 🚩🚩
Same line my abusive, narcissistic ex used when I refused to speak with him after 2 years. It's a massive control and guilt tactic.
As my boyfriend now told my ex then "you're right, we are all adults. And as an adult, you need to respect her decision to not speak with you, and move on. That is what adults do. They don't harass and stalk, making someone change phone numbers"
And even HE didn't just SHOW up outside my damn house and post a picture. Jfc this girl is an unchecked level of unhinged narcissist. She needs to be taken off this platform.
Never watched her shit before, but these few clips told me exactly why. Being mean isn't fucking funny. We all know she's making up for her own shortcomings.
similar experience with a family member, he tried to guilt me into conversation while he was still harassing and threatening his exes, so i told him to die 🤷♂️
Out of literally ALL of this, I am so upset how scared Erin is. She is so right. She's a normal human being, a normal member of society, etc etc. To me and a lot of the fans of Jack, Jack is also some normal guy who goofs off on the internet and is just a separate entity from his content. Yes he and Erin share bits of their lives, but it's always felt like a pretty hard line on what we as the audience are able to interact in that way. Maybe it's just been my personal view on UA-cam personalities over the last decade or so as more and more doxxing, swatting, PPOs, and fallouts have happened; that people deserve the privacy they begin with even with the work and "celebrity" status they hold. No one but who you tell and invite should know where you live, that's a blanket statement that everyone should abide by. For her to go after someone who is literally innocent, Erin, and claim Jack is the one she needs a PPO against is WILD.
Creators/posters are opening themselves up to critical questions, negative or positive feedback, harsh questioning, and everything in-between; the nature of posts and uploads with a comment section is to be critiqued one way or another. She has been on UA-cam for long enough to know that VERY well. She has been criticized, she has been laughed at, she has been praised! It shows so fucking much of who she is as a person for her to basically crack like this. Going out of her way to PUBLICLY go to who I'd say is a stranger's house and post it for MILLIONS of people to see, including the person and his wife, with the intent of what, scaring them into submission?? Erin doesn't deserve that. Jack doesn't deserve that. Fuck, Klondike, Sundae, and Chipwich don't deserve that. Back when Jack and Jenna were (albeit jokingly) feuding over who's dogs were superior, Jenna didn't post where Jack lived or vice versa. Hell, Jinx didn't post where Jack lived!! This is genuinely a fucking crime, actually terrorizing the person who is actually putting you in the correct angle for the criticism you deserve- yet instead of oh I don't know growing and learning and changing for the better and being a positive influence on your millions of subscribers you fucking DOX THE PERSON!?@?@? Actually fucking wild. She deserves a swift ban from all platforms.
Hell, it's the same thing with Ludwig and Qtie (can't remember her spelling). She has talked about the PTSD she has from the SWATing, she and Lud have talked about the police not listening to them about how this keeps happening and how this shouldn't be a problem anymore, she has talked about just quitting because of it. People deserve their common privacy no matter who they are.
I saw a yotuber make an insanely gold point. EVEN JAKE fuxking PAUL, one of the worst creators ever. Didn't go as far as to dox Cody Ko when he made a "confrontation"
Not reading allat
Sniperwolf is the person who was arrested for armed robbery
1:23 i just realised that farting is trending more than sniperwolf on twitter
just a reminder, she has been convicted for armed robbery before. She's insane and should be in jail
What??
@@sergiopepe2210back in like 2013 an undercover police officer suspected her and some guy both of shoplifting and they got into a fight with him where she eventually hit him, which got her arrested. The comment juices it up way more than how it actually went down but she's still a pretty shitty person either way
@@sergiopepe2210ya it was like a decade ago or something
@@GoGoRobotopretty sure she also ignored a make a wish girl wish
The mugshot was real but I heard that the armed robbery part was edited and she was convicted for smth else? Idk
He’s not trying to shame her off the platform. He’s trying to make her see that she needs to do it CORRECTLY. He literally just wants her to credit the creators she gets the content from, not steal THEIR jokes, get permission from the creators if and when possible, and provide some kind of transformative nature to her content theft so it isn’t straight up stealing. Hes never said he’s trying to shame her off youtube. Unfortunately.
Exactly!
Yeah i know hat it's not his goal per se ... but at her level of thefts , the massive amounts , and on account of her being just nasty , just shame her off the platform
Yap jack would have been the first one to congratulate and support Sssniperwolf had she actually listened to criticism and showed change. She completely blew off her chances
He is trying to get her deplatformed that is real intention his whole career is built on destroying other creators how is this even allowed he no right to bully,intimidate other creators he is not the owner of UA-cam what he has done is by far more illegal and hateful than any other content creator I have ever seen!!!!his whole career is built in hate how is that transformative
@@tfkdandsvkc"his whole career is build on destroying other creators careers" 😂😂
You're aware he's been around for 15+ years, has made two extremely influential formats with YGS and YIAY, and has made parody content about everything for the entire time right?
But sure he has targetted a total amount of like 7 creators (or creator groups) in total over those 15+ years, that's definitely the thing that defined his career. After all, some of the creators he "destroyed" were Jinx, Oneeseon, Leefy, and RJW, who all left youtube after being called out into oblivion on how shitty their content was, with two of them even being removed by UA-cam themselves, because of how blatantly they stole content and harassed other creators. But that was definitely Jacks biggest accomplishments, and not single handedly creating a format that has been stolen dozens of times by creators multiple times his size.
The “apology” video from her gonna hit like crack
It is frustrating how UA-cam won't do anything. There are so many channels like this to take her place as well
It goes back even further than Jinx, he did a video 12 years ago mocking Ray William Johnson's =3. He's been calling out react content for pretty much it's entire existence on UA-cam, so her saying he's just going after women is incredibly inaccurate at the very least
Hell, more recently, he did a video a year ago on his JJJacksfilms channel that parodied the Sidemen Reacts videos, yet another male-centric reaction channel.
So his content is all about hating other content creators doing their job and minding their business while breaking multiple laws in the process????
@@tfkdandsvkcah, we have a funny guy here!
... Right? You're just fooling around?
... No?
@xahani1287 Idk about Ray William Johnson (other than he was all over UA-cam back in the day and seemed very obnoxious), but Jinx was a leech. Just a male Sssniperwolf in that he offered nothing in his "reactions." No credit to the original creator either. Reaction videos can be done well if they offer original insight and, again, credit to the original creator(s). "Doing their jobs" as UA-camrs must entail respecting fair use laws and not being a lazy freebooter, which keeps other creators from doing their jobs and making an honest income.
I see you've left nearly 50 comments on this video defending Sssniperwolf, so you're very passionate about this. I understand the need to defend our favorite UA-camrs from criticism, but criticism against her in this case is entirely warranted.
What "multiple laws" is Jack breaking?
@kmonti1 To me, what made RWJ so bad was that his videos were so short, there was no reason to browse the front page for the funniest videos of the day when his videos were top of the recommended and had the days funniest videos already in it.
We love it when a literally crime, a full on crime that can land you in jail, is committed on UA-cam and nothing is done. Give it a few weeks and everyone’s short attention spans will forget this and she’ll get off with no consequences for BREAKING A LAW. We can only hope people actually remember this for long enough that action is taken by someone or UA-cam.
Hmm we'll see. He's been getting more and more vocal about the situation, and now other creators like ludwig are helping to spread the word. I've never watched a single video from either of those two creators (and probably never will) but I know about the situation now and will end up probably keeping tabs on it.
@@tfkdandsvkc and so what law is being broken? exposing someone for stealing content for over half a decade isn't a crime now is it?
@@tfkdandsvkc She's not gonna blow you, bud.
@@tfkdandsvkcSo let’s say you bully me, and I decide to confront you outside your house without your approval and posting your address to millions of people on social media. What are you going to do? Your life is now in danger because anyone can swat or attack you any time of day. Your take is invalid
@@tfkdandsvkc Oh no! He bullied someone who stole content from children and made millions on it! What a terrible person!
She definitely went after Jack because of his 2nd channel where he just makes fun of her basically it got under her skin and she became completely unhinged.
I've played sssniperwolf bingo on multiple occasions, and the streams went for hours. And during those long streams, Jacksfilms never insulted or harassed Lia herself. He criticized and made fun of her content, her empty and lazy reactions. He didn't bully her, he encouraged her to change, appealing to some possible residue of morals she might have had. Obviously, that train left the station.
I gotta ask were you there for the stream where jack and Erin realized she was outside because I wasn’t and want to learn more info about what happened there
@@Door227 no, I wasn't there at that moment, I learned about the situation from his tweet the next day, like the most of us
@@imkingmailru alright
7:27 This is an important part Ludwig/Mogul Mail skipped. These tweets from JacksFilms did not come out of no where. It was because UA-cam (as credited in his tweet shown in the video) had praised SssniperWolf saying she's such a good creator. He had come after her after being insulted because UA-cam themselves had essentially said that it's ok to steal content. Which is where the problem he has lies
Jack's sniperwolf bingo is my current favourite thing on UA-cam. Transforming her non transformative content, crediting the creators FOR HER, empowering the victim creators to take action against sniperwolf's content the right way, all while making a fun game out of that process
Update this video, it is NOT okay that she got ONE paycheck taken away for a literal crime. #BanSssniperwolf
fun fact: jack's been doing this since the RWJ = 3 days, before sniper had a functioning channel
I would also like to talk about her hypocrisy in attempting to use sexism as a cover, the "He's just mad a woman has more views" excuse, while blatantly empowering negative stereotypes of women as another cover for her doxxing him recently. Her joke of "What would you do if we showed up outside your house" with her trying to look harmless and "cute" blatantly draws on a negative stereotype that women are inherently weak and passive, and thus, can never be the aggressors. It's a negative stereotype of women that also causes a equal negative stereotype of men always being the aggressors in any conflict. In essence, her joke is trying to say "I'm just a small woman, I can't possibly be a threat, he's just being mean to me".
Keep that in mind, she is simultaneously trying to say she shouldn't be undervalued for being a woman, but she is also undervaluing herself in an attempt to say she can't possibly be a threat. She is a sociopath weaponizing stereotypes and societal biases to paint herself as a victim and suit her own needs.
Holy shit that's the best comment summarizing this whole ordeal its fucking perfect bro
@@cook3d_fish280fr
Well said!
This is batshit insane. The real world isn't a call of duty lobby. Surprised she didn't try to SWAT him.
Her 13-year-old fans will do.
What is batshit insane is jackfilms leading a whole hate campaign for months against her thats real evil right there
@@tfkdandsvkc You really think that his channel in which he makes fun of a scummy freebooting youtuber that farms views from smaller creators is worse than doxxing?
speaking of her 13-year-old fans
What she did should be punished both by UA-cam and authorities. This is not some type of joke or a "consequences of my own actions" moment she apparently thinks it is. It's a crime and she should be held accountable and punished. I really hope both Jack and Erin are ok after this.
And I've mentioned this in a few other videos, but this really makes one of her videos take on a new meaning. One video shows this guy crawling toward the camera and stalkerwolf 'reacts' by saying something like, "A certain someone creepily stalking towards me," and yet here we are with her being the creepy stalker. Not only did that not age well _at all,_ but it also just goes to show she's got a bit of a projection problem lol.
Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgment