I have a Mk7.5 1.0 TSI DSG, the car is a ton of fun to drive and feels quicker than it really is. Handles like a dream too very planted (17" wheels, factory sport suspension). Way too much fun for a daily driver.
@@andersnielsen6044 with all the new small turbocharged engines, DSG definitely is the way to go because you dont fall into the turbo-lag after each upshift. those things are indeed surprisingly quick then.
The real question is... what else do you need? I have this engine in my Octavia with 115hp and coupled to a DSG7. The DSG is a bit clunky on the downshift, which is starting to annoy me a bit but overall, great drivetrain. I don't want anything else (except for the clunkyness to go away :) ). Anyone knows what might be causing this?
@@bralis2 i have 10 1.0tsi golfs in my company,everyone over 200 000km the oldest one has got over 400k on it, german autobahn... no problems what soever
@@SuperV8driver It is beyond me why normal engines (above 2.0) become extinct these days. In 1990s and early 2000s it was common for engine to be 2.0 or 2.4. Beyond me it is what they are tryin to achieve with this stupid policy.
@@bralis2 safe energy, increase efficiency... no too hard to get, or is it? For example: golf 4 from around 2000 consumes about 8-10 liters Golf 8 consumes about 5-6 liters While beeing 30% heavier, 50% more comfortable and mire powerful.
@@SuperV8driver Think .... for example ther is a person who takes 5 flights a year on average. There is another person who does not take a single flight a year. Who saves more on CO2 emissions and can drive 2.0 and still be as eco-friendly? Of course if flights are prohibited and everyone drives 1.0 its OK, but it is far from it. Let's not talk about chimneys in China, Poland etc.
i have it in my Skoda Scala and for real it was on dyno with a read out of almost 124Hp and 227Nm and for no reason i trested it out on a max topspeed of 212Km/h
I don't understand why people kept praising this engine.... it suffers lots of the same problems plagued with 3 cylinder turbo engines.... the low end torque is pretty non-existed before 2000rpm which makes hill climbing in Austria, Northern Italy & Spain, very painful, sometimes the small hilly towns in Spain would require a downshift from 2nd to 1st, and the gear ratio was so poorly designed that when were in 2nd gear, it runs at 1800rpm which will NOT have enough torque to climb up the hill and you have to downshift to 1st, but 1st gear ratio is a bit too wide, which will instant shoot up to 4000rpm and causing car jerking motions.
@@elektronneutrino5003 yes, I mostly drove NA v6, v8 through out my life (in Canada) and this 3 cylinder doesn't seem to feel very well for me. I just rented a VW Golf in Euro and this is genuinely how I felt coming from a NA V6, V8 vehicle owners...
@@xuanzheng1049 Yes, this feels like a bad prank the EU and the auto makers are playing on us... these turbo charged 3 cyl. engines aren't even more economical in real world driving - only on the test bench.
I don't think anyone is "praising" this engine. If you want torque, why would you buy a 1.0L 3cyl over something with an inline 6. Japan has perfected the 3cyl turbo and they've been implementing them in Keijidosha for years very successfully. They've been less popular in other markets, so some European manufacturers are trying to take advantage of this lack of presence from Japan and are copying what they do best. Although the layout doesn't make much sense from a physics perspective, in recent years, the disadvantages of 3 cylinders have mostly been eradicated, and the advantages are very popular currently. The point isn't to buy this car get up steep hills with ease in second gear, the point is to lessen your impact on the environment, spend less, decrease bonnet space, be more economical, be lightweight, etc. It's a grocery getter. If your car is jerking when you downshift, maybe you should improve your rev matching and clutch control.
@@scottykilmer1094so why you bought 3 if you wasn't pleased with the quality ? I can't say it s expensive but neither cheap ,it s a very good balance and for that price for what s on the market i think it s best option . Now i ask you what model did you have in the past because if you owned an up or polo from 2000 i can understand 🤣 And one more thing please check your language next time!
I have a Mk7.5 1.0 TSI DSG, the car is a ton of fun to drive and feels quicker than it really is. Handles like a dream too very planted (17" wheels, factory sport suspension). Way too much fun for a daily driver.
youre full of it lol
DSG is for people with no arms and legs.. I feel sorry for you.
@@andersnielsen6044 with all the new small turbocharged engines, DSG definitely is the way to go because you dont fall into the turbo-lag after each upshift. those things are indeed surprisingly quick then.
@@Digi20 So rev-match is not for the average Joe to handle? :D
@@andersnielsen6044 upshift, not downshift.
The real question is... what else do you need? I have this engine in my Octavia with 115hp and coupled to a DSG7. The DSG is a bit clunky on the downshift, which is starting to annoy me a bit but overall, great drivetrain. I don't want anything else (except for the clunkyness to go away :) ). Anyone knows what might be causing this?
Silent considering this is a 3 cylinder engine
J'ai la meme motorisation et ça marche tres bien surtout avec la dsg7
Impressing how a 1.0 l car can reach 200km/h
Reaching is one thing, I don't think it will last long if one drives it at those speeds.
@@bralis2 i have 10 1.0tsi golfs in my company,everyone over 200 000km the oldest one has got over 400k on it, german autobahn... no problems what soever
@@SuperV8driver It is beyond me why normal engines (above 2.0) become extinct these days. In 1990s and early 2000s it was common for engine to be 2.0 or 2.4.
Beyond me it is what they are tryin to achieve with this stupid policy.
@@bralis2 safe energy, increase efficiency... no too hard to get, or is it?
For example: golf 4 from around 2000 consumes about 8-10 liters
Golf 8 consumes about 5-6 liters
While beeing 30% heavier, 50% more comfortable and mire powerful.
@@SuperV8driver Think .... for example ther is a person who takes 5 flights a year on average.
There is another person who does not take a single flight a year. Who saves more on CO2 emissions and can drive 2.0 and still be as eco-friendly? Of course if flights are prohibited and everyone drives 1.0 its OK, but it is far from it. Let's not talk about chimneys in China, Poland etc.
Would u recommend buying a VW passat golf sportscombi with 1.0TSI DSG and 115hp model 2019?
I have it in Skoda Fabia colour edition 1.0 TSI 110
Nice one! Always a safe drive 🚗
i have it in my Skoda Scala and for real it was on dyno with a read out of almost 124Hp and 227Nm and for no reason i trested it out on a max topspeed of 212Km/h
I have this Engine (115HP) in my Polo, nice little thing 👍
I don't understand why people kept praising this engine.... it suffers lots of the same problems plagued with 3 cylinder turbo engines.... the low end torque is pretty non-existed before 2000rpm which makes hill climbing in Austria, Northern Italy & Spain, very painful, sometimes the small hilly towns in Spain would require a downshift from 2nd to 1st, and the gear ratio was so poorly designed that when were in 2nd gear, it runs at 1800rpm which will NOT have enough torque to climb up the hill and you have to downshift to 1st, but 1st gear ratio is a bit too wide, which will instant shoot up to 4000rpm and causing car jerking motions.
That sounds a lot like my 3 cylinder BMW 116i :) slight incline on the Autobahn, and you have to downshift to 5ft or even 4th
@@elektronneutrino5003 yes, I mostly drove NA v6, v8 through out my life (in Canada) and this 3 cylinder doesn't seem to feel very well for me. I just rented a VW Golf in Euro and this is genuinely how I felt coming from a NA V6, V8 vehicle owners...
@@xuanzheng1049 Yes, this feels like a bad prank the EU and the auto makers are playing on us... these turbo charged 3 cyl. engines aren't even more economical in real world driving - only on the test bench.
I don't think anyone is "praising" this engine. If you want torque, why would you buy a 1.0L 3cyl over something with an inline 6. Japan has perfected the 3cyl turbo and they've been implementing them in Keijidosha for years very successfully. They've been less popular in other markets, so some European manufacturers are trying to take advantage of this lack of presence from Japan and are copying what they do best. Although the layout doesn't make much sense from a physics perspective, in recent years, the disadvantages of 3 cylinders have mostly been eradicated, and the advantages are very popular currently. The point isn't to buy this car get up steep hills with ease in second gear, the point is to lessen your impact on the environment, spend less, decrease bonnet space, be more economical, be lightweight, etc. It's a grocery getter. If your car is jerking when you downshift, maybe you should improve your rev matching and clutch control.
Best on the flat!
Super & Thank You So Much ...
I have this engine in my 2024 Audi A1 Sline. Reasonably nippy and gets great fuel economy of 60+ MPG on motorway runs.
Are there any defects?
This engine has good record so far.
Would you recommend me to buy one of them?
I just drove this car for a weekend. But it was quite nice
Yes
Yes
Yes !
I wanted polo with a 6 gear manual :/
I got this, I was thinking. Of getting remapped stage 1
Lentissima
Yess offcourse it has a boring simple cheap made interior its a Volkswagen! 🤣
Cringe
You never owned one 🤣
i owned 3 of them silly antoc 🤣
@@scottykilmer1094 it doesn't seem so
@@scottykilmer1094so why you bought 3 if you wasn't pleased with the quality ? I can't say it s expensive but neither cheap ,it s a very good balance and for that price for what s on the market i think it s best option .
Now i ask you what model did you have in the past because if you owned an up or polo from 2000 i can understand 🤣
And one more thing please check your language next time!