Comparison of Airbus C 295 aircraft vs Embraer KC 390 cargo aircraft. Which is the best?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 січ 2023
  • Hello, and welcome back to another amazing episode of Jetliner Marvel. We will compare two military cargo aircraft in this video. The Airbus C295 and the Embraer C-390 Millennium are both medium-sized military and civilian transport aircraft, but they have some differences in terms of their capabilities and features.
    #C295 #KC390 #Airbus #Embraer

КОМЕНТАРІ • 81

  • @utkarshg.bharti9714
    @utkarshg.bharti9714 Рік тому +33

    The Brazilians should seriously market this jet in Asia. As of what the reports say, India alone needs about 30 jets in this category immediately in the coming 4-5 years and an equal amount in the near future. Then you have Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Kazakhstan.

    • @joaomoreira9689
      @joaomoreira9689 4 місяці тому

      Acabamos de vender 36 pra Arábia Saudita, 12 pra Portugal, 10 pra China, 10 pra Coréia do Sul, 10 pra África do Sul, 12 pra Suécia, 12 pra Holanda, 10 pra República Tcheca e outros 50 pra outros 20 países.
      Mas uma encomenda de 1 avião me incomoda......
      1 pra USA.
      Porque querem apenas 1?
      Porque será?

  • @SERGIO-cr6uy
    @SERGIO-cr6uy 4 місяці тому +4

    I cannot wait for a comparison between a Mercedes E class and a Volkswagen Golf

  • @juanangelalonsoruiz8839
    @juanangelalonsoruiz8839 3 місяці тому +5

    Ademas no se pueden comparar ya que uno es mas grande oero no mejor que el otro es como si comparamos el Embraer con A400M nontiene comparacion el c295 no tiene rival

  • @1guitarlover
    @1guitarlover Рік тому +17

    You are missing important information like the hourly operating costs, availability of spare parts and fuel consumption. At the very end a purchasing decision is heavily based on these parameters.

    • @joaomoreira9689
      @joaomoreira9689 4 місяці тому +1

      Brasil tem a segunda indústria mais forte das Américas. Fique tranquilo. Fomos os criadores do Avião. Santos Dumont fez um Avião documentado. Irmãos Wright fizeram uma catapulta com pessoas dentro.
      Brasil tem o melhor avião cargueiro do mundo(KC-390), o melhor avião de treinamento e de combate às drogas do mundo (Super-Tucano) e num acordo com a Suécia começamos a fabricar um Avião Caça de geração 4.5 .
      Não somos um país sem reposição de peças.
      Nem vivemos de carnaval. 😊

  • @enzovernille3800
    @enzovernille3800 Рік тому +12

    Ironically
    The Brazilian Air Force have Both in her inventory
    But seems like an unfair comparison

  • @carloseduardoxavier2184
    @carloseduardoxavier2184 9 місяців тому +11

    Força Aérea Brasileira, utiliza os dois modelos! Embraer KC-390 e o Casa C-295 um complementa o outro! ✈️

  • @adityasusantapanda
    @adityasusantapanda Рік тому +45

    It's clear...you can't compare apples with oranges...c295's turbo-prop & the counterpart is turbo-jet...there's no comparison at all... तमाशा खतम!!!!

    • @pedrofmc0000
      @pedrofmc0000 Рік тому +1

      Also both planes can transport different loads becuase they also have different sizes.... This is a stupid video.

    • @adityasusantapanda
      @adityasusantapanda Рік тому +1

      @@pedrofmc0000 Yes!

    • @ReneChewbaka
      @ReneChewbaka 9 місяців тому +3

      Correction it's a turbofan. Not a turbojet.. this video also failed to mention the history of the Casa C-295 a joint project development with IPTN Aerospace Indonesia. Airbus had no part in its developing this aircraft

    • @adityasusantapanda
      @adityasusantapanda 9 місяців тому

      @@ReneChewbaka your actually speaking about an whole different Aircraft

    • @fatihalmirais3739
      @fatihalmirais3739 6 місяців тому

      @@ReneChewbakatrue

  • @gustavodrummond9941
    @gustavodrummond9941 5 місяців тому +3

    I flew the C295 for seven years, and these numbers are overstimated, even more in hot regions. But anyway, it is an excelent aircraft, and get the job done.

  • @robinho6760
    @robinho6760 8 місяців тому +5

    C295 is Spanish.

  • @Mathewszinho
    @Mathewszinho Рік тому +19

    On the Embraer website and on the aircraft's data sheet, it says that the KC-390 carries up to 26t, not 23t. Otherwise, the video is amazing. Congratulations to the channel.

  • @themodernnavigator4506
    @themodernnavigator4506 8 місяців тому +3

    KC-390 the best of the best! BRASIL!

  • @marcellofms
    @marcellofms Рік тому +18

    I see no sense in this comparison, since they are aircraft of totally different categories! Some of the competitors of the KC-390 are the North American C-130J, the Ukrainian AN-178 and the Chinese Y-9.

    • @x-gamessimulator1067
      @x-gamessimulator1067 Рік тому +3

      A400M

    • @matheus_hms
      @matheus_hms Рік тому +10

      @@x-gamessimulator1067 The Airbus A400M is in a superior category, so much so that some rumors point to the creation of the A200M to compete with models from Embraer and Lockheed.

    • @alexanderlarsson776
      @alexanderlarsson776 Рік тому

      I mean the C-295 was designed 30 years ago or something? its a bit of a strange comparison yea

    • @AndreCarneiro666
      @AndreCarneiro666 7 місяців тому

      A400M is another class@@x-gamessimulator1067

  • @JRR945
    @JRR945 Рік тому +8

    El C295 fue diseñado por CASA España, no sé a qué viene nombrar a Tata, ni a los Indonesios. Por otra parte, el comparable al KC390, no es el C295, sino el futuro Airbus C200

    • @cmt62536
      @cmt62536 Рік тому

      CASA es subsidiaria Airbus. Airbus C-295.

    • @jorge9717
      @jorge9717 8 місяців тому +2

      ​@@cmt62536 cuando casa lo diseñó era independiente de airbus

    • @enriqueburgos9754
      @enriqueburgos9754 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@cmt62536 CASA es empresa fundacional de Airbus.
      AIRBUS (Aerospatile-Matra, francesa; Dornier, alemana y CASA española, entre las tres tienen el 55% de las acciones)

  • @WhiteDovePBB
    @WhiteDovePBB 6 місяців тому +1

    Nice video, just subscribed.

  • @amonmorais9517
    @amonmorais9517 5 місяців тому +2

    Amazing Brazilian aircraft 😊

  • @ricardoconti3868
    @ricardoconti3868 6 місяців тому +1

    Nice Video. Sorry bro, 4:59 but i guess the engines of C-390 are Pratt & Whitney IAE V2500-E5, sorry if i'm wrong, just trying to help.

  • @ancientwarrior2374
    @ancientwarrior2374 Місяць тому

    C 295 is exceptionally beautiful but C 390 pretty much resembles C 17(the G.O.A.T) so it's just perfect

  • @juanangelalonsoruiz8839
    @juanangelalonsoruiz8839 3 місяці тому +2

    El c295 es un avion español el mejor de su categoria muy bueno y muy fiable este avion a pasado a airbus oero se fabrica en espala y nontiene igual

  • @christoph3805
    @christoph3805 Рік тому +4

    You should compare the KC 390 with the C 130. A Comparison with a much smaller Aircraft built for complete other Operations makes no Sense.Sorry

  • @gregwilliams386
    @gregwilliams386 Місяць тому

    Looks like if you need 3 jeeps you'll need a second C-390. Looks good for small loads.

  • @terra2jaquesmuller333
    @terra2jaquesmuller333 6 місяців тому +1

    Kc390 the best.

  • @fabioartner2794
    @fabioartner2794 4 місяці тому

    O C-390 é um avião sensacional!!👍👏🇧🇷

  • @user-hm3el7io6j
    @user-hm3el7io6j Рік тому +9

    С 295 beautiful aircraft.

  • @DNPM11
    @DNPM11 Рік тому +8

    Kc 390 is the best..... point

  • @kenbarthSimAV8tor
    @kenbarthSimAV8tor Рік тому

    Airbus C 295 will be replacing DHC Buffalo for Canadian Armed Forces Search and Rescue (SAR) eh!

  • @theowinosowino5814
    @theowinosowino5814 9 днів тому

    Now you saying the KC has a range of 6000km. In the other video you said it has 3000km. I don’t think you know anything about aircraft specification.

  • @motogper6543
    @motogper6543 Рік тому +3

    Not really a Fair comparison.

  • @deanwood1338
    @deanwood1338 Рік тому +2

    Watching this video is clear that you have no interest in military equipment because it is a shockingly bad comparison

  • @dipenkhara4773
    @dipenkhara4773 6 місяців тому

    Compare prop to prop and a jet to jet

  • @sanjaysable2006
    @sanjaysable2006 8 місяців тому

    AN-32 ❤ The best.🎉😊

  • @loungeroomrecords
    @loungeroomrecords Рік тому +2

    Jet and turbo-prop are no comparison - if you are comparing function/purpose fine but still they are different leagues in terms of capability

    • @j.b.2263
      @j.b.2263 Рік тому

      Yet turbo-props are better for some jobs. While the C295 has less range it has a higher in zone operation time due to less fuel consumption. Its lower speed also helps in some cases and its short take off capacity in uneven terrain is also great in some cases.
      Ill give examples:
      As an AWACS, SAR plane, electronic warfare and intelligence gathering the c295 does better than the KC 390.

  • @lairtonrocha1771
    @lairtonrocha1771 9 днів тому

    Na verdade o que eu vi foi muita choradeira dos EU. Nosso é bom em tudo não trm pra americano, europeu ou asiaticos, somos a terra de Santos Dumont o pai verdadeiramente da aviação. Os irmãos americanos fezeram uma catapulta e se lancaram nós não o avião tinha certificado europeu , motor e planou como um pássaro, todos viram e sairam maravilhados, ta no sangue nosso, sempre fomos curioso nisso. E mais em 40 anos nos transformamos no terceiro fabricantes de aeronave do mundo. Tudo fruto de muito trabalho. Pra se ter uma ideia a Boinge colocou um escritório em Sao Paulo. Nossos engenheiros sao uns dos melhores do mundo. O Gripen ja usa componentes nossos como display de última geração. Somos foda.

  • @finger3215
    @finger3215 Рік тому +8

    This comparison makes no sense.
    Kc390 is better compared with kawasaki c2

    • @abhinavayush967
      @abhinavayush967 Рік тому +2

      NO , C2 has 33 ton capacity , wider body , more seats , more range and more price

    • @utkarshg.bharti9714
      @utkarshg.bharti9714 Рік тому

      @@abhinavayush967 C2 is a heavier-class jet, along with Airbus A400M and Boeing C-17. The right comparison is with the Lockheed C-130.

  • @AndreCarneiro666
    @AndreCarneiro666 Рік тому +4

    KC-390 is superior. Period.

    • @deanwood1338
      @deanwood1338 Рік тому +3

      Compared to something that is not even in the same class, of course it is 🤦‍♂️

  • @SmelloF
    @SmelloF 6 місяців тому

    The kc390 is certainly superior to the C295, but the Brazilian KC without an artillery system or a 105mm cannon, has no persuasive power at all. Military aircraft, without a Gunship system.

    • @joaomoreira9689
      @joaomoreira9689 4 місяці тому +1

      Ele tem

    • @SmelloF
      @SmelloF 4 місяці тому

      @@joaomoreira9689 um protótipo apresentado aos emirados árabes 1 unidade na cor caqui camuflado como camurça,

    • @SmelloF
      @SmelloF 4 місяці тому

      Tem uma foto dele no canal Caiafa master

  • @RJLorran
    @RJLorran 8 місяців тому

    This is not the same role, and kc390 have 26T not 23

  • @kenken3737
    @kenken3737 Рік тому +2

    1

  • @carlosfernandez6766
    @carlosfernandez6766 11 місяців тому +6

    This video did not talk about the military mission of both: whereas the Embraer is most likely a regular cargo plane designed to do logistic missions, the C295 is an excellent tactical airlifter designed to do special air operation missions. Don't skip the military side on military planes; we are not comparing civilian ones!

    • @MatheusRodrigues-ef4om
      @MatheusRodrigues-ef4om 9 місяців тому +6

      To reduce the KC390 to "logistic mission airplane" is madness... The aircraft is designed to be multimission and reconfigurable as required. KC390 is certified for Airdrop, paratroopers missions, fire fighting, inflight refueling and more...

    • @claudiodossantosmoreira7686
      @claudiodossantosmoreira7686 8 місяців тому

      Não entende de nada o KC 390 é um avião projetado para uso militar avião "carga regular "so um leigo de em aviação falaria isto.

    • @joaomoreira9689
      @joaomoreira9689 4 місяці тому

      ​@@MatheusRodrigues-ef4om Além de bombardeiro.

  • @shakiMiki
    @shakiMiki Рік тому

    Terrible, terrible script. And don't start with how great you are.

  • @Fanjal
    @Fanjal Рік тому +8

    Stupid comparison. Also, plenty of incorrect data, the list of customers for the C295 is huge with 33 countries currently operating it, not the four mentioned.

    • @pedrofmc0000
      @pedrofmc0000 Рік тому +5

      And although is made currently by Airbus, it was designed by CASA, a Spanish company integrated years ago in Airbus.

    • @cmt62536
      @cmt62536 Рік тому

      @@pedrofmc0000 CASA es subsidiaria de Airbus, es un avión Airbus.

    • @pedrofmc0000
      @pedrofmc0000 Рік тому +3

      @@cmt62536 Ya lo se. Parece que no entiendes inglés... Dije "diseñado por"... una compañía "INTEGRADA" hace años en... *¡Airbus!* . ¿Lo has entendido ahora o lo necesitas en más idiomas?

    • @hasibalamnayeem6654
      @hasibalamnayeem6654 10 місяців тому

      Bangladesh operating 2 C295....

    • @cmt62536
      @cmt62536 9 місяців тому

      ​​@@pedrofmc0000
      El Mcdonnel Douglas FA-18 hoy se llama BOEING FA-18 😂

  • @x-gamessimulator1067
    @x-gamessimulator1067 Рік тому +5

    Ridiculous comparison!
    If it was the KC390 VS A400M VS C-17. It would be more interesting.
    The C-295 is the size of the ATR-42!

    • @luisfelipeamorim8531
      @luisfelipeamorim8531 Рік тому +4

      The one you propose would also bê a ridiculous comparison.

    • @deanwood1338
      @deanwood1338 Рік тому

      @@luisfelipeamorim8531 yeah it would be 🤦‍♂️

  • @jorge9717
    @jorge9717 8 місяців тому

    This video has many mistakes

  • @rogerioalvarez8731
    @rogerioalvarez8731 Рік тому +1

    MAN ..GET YOUR INFO CORRECT....THE PRICE TAG FOR THE KC390 IS 50 MILLION ....AND ITHIS REGARD IT IS CHEAPER THAN THE C295...

  • @tommypaget2294
    @tommypaget2294 10 місяців тому

    ****how about comparing the price??😂…….it’s like comparing BMW320 to Hyundai……….so, bro, you can’t compare turboprops to jets. Sure, jets are better, but at what cost.? Can’t compare apples to oranges. In short, it’s a bad comparison.*******

  • @salvador9369
    @salvador9369 8 місяців тому

    Quieres comparar ajos con cebollas o peso ligero con peso pluma. Ambos están encuadrados en categorías diferentes. Es igual de absurdo que si compararas al KC-390 VS A-400M o una moto VS un coche (auto).
    Tienes que aprender conceptos básicos sobre aviones de transportes militares antes de hacer un vídeo sobre eso mismo.
    Saludos.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    You want to compare garlic with onions or light weight with featherweight. Both are framed in different categories. It´s just as absurd as if you compared the KC-390 VS A-400M or a motorcycle VS a car.
    You have to learn basic concepts about military transport aircrafts before making a video about it.
    Greetings.