Why does everyone keep hating on Krip's intros? If you don't like it...don't watch the channel. I, for one, enjoy his intro and insight/intro into all his vids. Day9 does the same. Do you ever see ppl hating on Day9? No. Cos no1 hates on Day9. So have respect for Krip as well.
May I only watch a part of the video? Is there a rule which forces me to watch the whole video? He gets his view counter one up anyways therefore it's a win-win situation.
Kripp grunts as he thrusts his donger into Hafu. After an hour of donger push ups it's clear that Hafu's taco shell is much too stretched out to contain any of the Kripp's meat. Eventually Kripp gets bored of Hafu's used snatch and leaves to play Hearthstone.
Kripparrian Kripparrians as he Kripparrians his Kripparrian into Kripparrian. After a Kripparrian of Kripparrian push ups it's Kripparrian that Kripparrian's Kripparrian shell is much too stretched out to contain any of the Kripparrian's Kripparrian. Eventually Kripparrian gets Kripparrian of Kripparrian's used Kripparrian and leaves to play Kripparrian.
i dont know why people are screaming pay2win about hearthstone. it is a fucking card game you need cards to play. at least this card game gives you a chance to play without paying
Daniel Mestre I never said that ever! You presume too much. Pay2win isn't bad, it just is. What I don't like is people saying it isn't pay2win when it clearly is.
8jb65 lol apologies. Usually pay2win has negative connotations, so I kinda had to presume there. But yeah Hearthstone is (with the exception of maybe Arena).
hearthstone is kind of pay to win. getting epics and legendaries takes an absurd amount of dust that takes forever to come buy via saving it up. making decks like these doesn't prove your point. not every epic/legendary are good, and those with the good ones (sylvanas, dr boom, rag, etc) will typically win the game against someone without those cards
It is if you really want to look at it that way but the proper way to look at it imo is by asking yourself is yugioh pay to win or pay to play? sure you can play for free in hearthstone but if you want to be competitive and min max your deck you need to put money into it like any other tcg (it's close enough to tcg with the dust and enchanting alright! lol)
Dan Bc i'd rather have a pay to play honestly. for people that play hearthstone without putting any money into it its frustrating as you will often lose against those who are lucky with draws or spent $$$ on packs. so yes, its "free to play", but if you wanna get anywhere you need to put in some money. i used to play magic, so i've played card games like yugioh, and the ones where you are requried to put in money are funner imo because everyone is one more of a level playing field in terms of cards at your disposal
Sylvanas and Rag are easy to deal with once you become familiar with their tactical quirks (although some decks struggle more than others, based more on strategic composition than dust value) and Dr. Boom is just a War Golem with flair. Most classes have some very powerful removal at low rarities, use that wisely and couple it with efficient minions and careful turns. You'll beat more high value decks than you might think.
The Message's Movies not my point. there is a reason nobody plays war golem, because that extra flair is what wins games in most cases. the fact that you have to play wiser just to play around 1 card (like sylvanas) kinda speaks for itself. if both players have equal skill, the one with better cards typically wins.
This does not prove anything. If you are dumb enough to make a shit deck with minimal synergy and bad cards, then of course you will lose. Just having a few legends can really change the game in your favor if your opponent has none.
Andrés Guerra Yes lets mention the one OP deck that the entire community hates to prove a point. Name 2-3 more decks that don't require legendary and can get to legendary.
Andrés Guerra The community hates it means it's the exception, as in abusing the flaws of the game. what "basic" paladin deck? what paladin deck doesn't use tirion lol. What priest deck doesn't use legendary. You say "some", never any specific deck. Not combo , not chinese, not control. Mill druid CANT get to legend unless you're one of the few pros who can get to legend w/ basically any deck. I've tested it various time and with an aggro meta, it's just suicide to play mill anything. Even against oil rogue or freeze mage, by turn 3-4 they'd already know your deck. I have nothing against legendary, but I can understand newplayer's frustrations. You need to have a fair amount of cards(most rare and some epic) to build a decent deck that can climb to rank 3-5. For new players, arena is a waste of money. They're forced to play ranked against scums who farm wins at rank 20. Btw, idk where you get the math for 3000 G from wins/month. say you play constructed, you'd need 9000 wins(sounds dumb already?). Say you have 50% win rate, you'd need 18000 games, each game averaging 10 minutes, that's 180000 minutes = 3000 hours = 300 hr/day.
Andrés Guerra Lol abuse the flaws of the game as in lack of viable cards that speed up late game. Only known cards are emperor and nourish, both can only be played way into the mid game, and by then it's too late. a deck that only uses basic cards and gets into legend. Sounds like a deck not even Kolento can use to get to legend. Let's face it for pros like trump, even with switching between VIABLE decks based on meta(& even resorting to patron, which we know is OP), getting to legend is a grind. i don't care about bots, as in if it proves anything. And no mill druid cannot get to legend lol. It does use volcanic lumberer, in case u didn't know, comboing with starfall/poison seed. It cannot deal w/ aggressive decks lol. It has absolutely no minion, except keeper and other higher cost minions. You definitely don't want to play oracle or grove tender against aggro, especially on turn 3, obv because then they'd know you're a mill druid. Mill druid is only ok against noob face hunters. Btw, you don't sound like you've ever gotten to legend(just saying). You seem to not understand the mechanics of the decks. About the gold calculation, obviously I didn't read carefully. Nevertheless, 60 matches a day is not viable lol. That's roughly 15 hours STRAIGHT OF PLAYING. Even streamers don't play that much, and it's THEIR JOB. You'd have to have no life to do that. A good estimate for a new player is at least 1 year for him to have decent cards to play constructed. That is if the guy is patient enough to keep playing.
My name is Jori Pasterino, brother of eddi pasterino, and I seriously regret starting "skipperino Kripperino". Now, whenever I go into the comments section, I cringe when someone copy pastes my comment and substitutes the time at which Kripp stops talking. Please, no pasterino! Also, 1:53 to not listen to kripp.
Mathieu Poulin i guess you could play sunwalker in the place of sludge belcher but i would definitely at a minimum get first two wings of nax for belcher/loatheb and first wing of blackrock for emperor
Kripp,p2w doesent mean to have full deck of leggies.You can have only good ones like rag,cairne,sylv,n'zoth and stuff and others like epics/rares or even commons because they're good most of the time.Still hearthstone is p2w,no argue.
It IS a pay2win, you pay for the most top deck at the moment (Mech-mage) (Rush-ranger) or whatever is in the time and... tadá, you are wining 75% of your games at least. Deal with it. (I love you Kripp)
We don't say you have to have every legendary to do good, but you do need SOME and it IS pay to win since you need a certain set of cards since the more options you have the better you can create your deck.
This deck really needs TBK. It allows you to punish druid decks that invest their whole turn on a big taunt. This allows you to gain back some of the tempo you lose in the early game. The games I win with 30 legends is often turn 6 TBK, turn 7 Boom, turn 8 KT. This follow-up works really well because when you stabilize with TBK you are still at a somewhat healthy life total. By turn 6 the opponent has seen maybe 3 or 4 cards (ALL legends), so they usually know what's going on. They know Dr. Boom, Ragnaros, Tirion and friends are coming so they want to finish you off asap. They sometimes even ignore the Boom Bots because they are scared of your legends or they answer your Dr. Boom with THEIR Dr. Boom (which obviously is the dream with KT in your hand). Also, if you add TBK, you might want Toshley. It allows you to kill non-taunt minions if you get Rusty Horn. Probably too cute though.
Kripp is a smart guy and Blizz appreciates him, as we do, so take this with a grain of salt. Hearthstone is not Pay2Win - it is like League of Legends, you can reach maximum potential faster by spending cash. Everybody knows that e.g. a Control Warrior without legendaries is weaker than same Warrior with the usual goodies.
One thing that makes Total Biscuits Hearthstone videos so enjoyable is that he will throw odd decks into ranked, and talk about the process. This would be much better if you did the same. I really enjoy you're explanations of choice at the start of your videos. But watching you play is kind of dull.
ever thoguht about making a warror spellcaster deck with the new random hit until it kill an enemy minion and pyromancer? with slam and others.. i think it could work right..
I think they should start makeing legendary weapons And for those classes that dont hold wepons make some kind of legendary shield wonder if it would work. No im not saying it should fully happen but just a thought on how they could make that work
I feel like the arena is a great cycle to open packs, and get more gold, to play more, and open more packs. However, Im a beginning player, just got my first 100 wins, so I have no idea if I should do arena, or how to.
Ricardo Dias I'm not complaining. I was just making a point. When did you start playing because that matters too. All thought i was wrong you don't need all the cards. You just need a majority of the good ones. About 75%. I also went for shaman as my first class. And well shaman is trash now.
One time when I was 18 I came home from school. I shouted to announce that I was home when I heard a noise from my kitchen. As I entered the kitchen I noticed my dad standing there with his meat in my GF! A grill that I had a close relationship with through many years. I was outraged, as it was my personal grill and I had told him to use the Weber-grill instead of my George Foreman grill, as the GF had just recently been cleaned.
This is different tho, it's even matched for you cause you guys have legendarys in a quantity, while people who don't are at a major disadvantage, and the disadvantage makes it a pay to play
It's not pay2win, it's pay2advance. Cards don't make you "win" more, they just give you more options over your opponent. Of course you can't play a fully-evolved Control Warrior until veeeery late into your Hearthstone career, but there are a lot more archetypes that require no legendaries whatsoever. You can get to Legend with a fairly basic deck, the thing that really takes a long time is learning how to play properly, and by that time you probably have the cards you need already.
Pretty much. If people are going to cry that this is p2w then they'd lose their shit over real tcg/ccg where the only way to get cards is money or trading.
![[Hearthstone] How Good Is Blingtron 3000?](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yPtXY4bP1jI/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Hearthstone] How Good Is Blingtron 3000?](/img/tr.png)
![[Hearthstone] Renolock: The Most Enjoyable Netdeck](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/A5POIP-rbX0/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Hearthstone] 30 Legendary Deck: Pay To WIN?!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dhXKOdJ0IGc/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Hearthstone] Blame The Bomber Warrior](/img/n.gif)
05:15 to skipperino kripperino
ty
ty
cheers lad
ty
thanks m8, made my day easier! :)
5:34 "Trump is slightly better than you kripp"
Or i am the only one hearing it?
No im hearing it too xD
Krip isn't very good at hearthstone for someone who plays it everyday, its true.
champdude17 That's why he came second at Blizzcon in 2013
UltimateSuperion Go see how the games played out and you will see why that is irrelevent.
UltimateSuperion
Blizzcon 2013 was a invitational. You can't say that the elite of Hearthstone was there. Just the famous streamers and personalities.
Why does everyone keep hating on Krip's intros? If you don't like it...don't watch the channel. I, for one, enjoy his intro and insight/intro into all his vids. Day9 does the same. Do you ever see ppl hating on Day9? No. Cos no1 hates on Day9. So have respect for Krip as well.
May I only watch a part of the video? Is there a rule which forces me to watch the whole video? He gets his view counter one up anyways therefore it's a win-win situation.
It's his video, so you can choose to skip or watch. He can do whatever he likes.
@@KaiGaming84Update, do you even still watch Kripp?
The 30 legendary deck: the videos I miss most from old kripp
Hearthstone is not p2w, it's pay to go fast, VERY fast
Danilo Mendonça The first useful comment im reading. Thanks mate.
Danilo Mendonça Gotta go fast
Yeah it's more so pay to advance. You can do well w/o paying but it'll go a lot slower
Pay 2 Sanic
Billy-Taso the Lord of Animes so you lost a minion to dr boom bombs and because of this hearthstone is pay to win?
Why not switch crap like hemet or maexxna with troggzor or other BETTER legendaries?
Hemet is there to combo with Tinkmaster, as explained in the video.
HighLanderPony Well could've pissed off the cho and put in a better legendary
Giorotto Yeah.
troggzor is surprisingly bad if you have no board at all
Kripparrian kripp
Kripp grunts as he thrusts his donger into Hafu. After an hour of donger push ups it's clear that Hafu's taco shell is much too stretched out to contain any of the Kripp's meat. Eventually Kripp gets bored of Hafu's used snatch and leaves to play Hearthstone.
Kripparrian Kripparrians as he Kripparrians his Kripparrian into Kripparrian. After a Kripparrian of Kripparrian push ups it's Kripparrian that Kripparrian's Kripparrian shell is much too stretched out to contain any of the Kripparrian's Kripparrian. Eventually Kripparrian gets Kripparrian of Kripparrian's used Kripparrian and leaves to play Kripparrian.
Alvanix You said Kripparian so many times it sounds weird now
re-posting stupid posts is even more stupid then the first time
TokeTaker420 Kripparrian.
Alvanix Ive gotten over it
I have a 20 word essay in for tomorrow and I'm sat here watching the Kripper!!
What kind of essay requires only 20 words?
17 cause I'm is short for I am and 20 is short form for twenty
i dont know why people are screaming pay2win about hearthstone. it is a fucking card game you need cards to play. at least this card game gives you a chance to play without paying
It is pay to win. I haven't heard any screaming about it, it is just a fact.
8jb65 if that's such a fact than any CCG/TCG is pay2win and therefore bad by (presumably) your logic (that pay2win = bad)
Daniel Mestre I never said that ever! You presume too much. Pay2win isn't bad, it just is. What I don't like is people saying it isn't pay2win when it clearly is.
8jb65 lol apologies. Usually pay2win has negative connotations, so I kinda had to presume there. But yeah Hearthstone is (with the exception of maybe Arena).
yea when you play zoo
Would love more of this! This was vid was fun to watch.
I like Kripps commentary and reactions.. So i'm enjoying his vids even tho I don't play HS at all.
hearthstone is kind of pay to win. getting epics and legendaries takes an absurd amount of dust that takes forever to come buy via saving it up. making decks like these doesn't prove your point. not every epic/legendary are good, and those with the good ones (sylvanas, dr boom, rag, etc) will typically win the game against someone without those cards
It is if you really want to look at it that way but the proper way to look at it imo is by asking yourself is yugioh pay to win or pay to play? sure you can play for free in hearthstone but if you want to be competitive and min max your deck you need to put money into it like any other tcg (it's close enough to tcg with the dust and enchanting alright! lol)
Dan Bc i'd rather have a pay to play honestly. for people that play hearthstone without putting any money into it its frustrating as you will often lose against those who are lucky with draws or spent $$$ on packs. so yes, its "free to play", but if you wanna get anywhere you need to put in some money.
i used to play magic, so i've played card games like yugioh, and the ones where you are requried to put in money are funner imo because everyone is one more of a level playing field in terms of cards at your disposal
Sylvanas and Rag are easy to deal with once you become familiar with their tactical quirks (although some decks struggle more than others, based more on strategic composition than dust value) and Dr. Boom is just a War Golem with flair. Most classes have some very powerful removal at low rarities, use that wisely and couple it with efficient minions and careful turns. You'll beat more high value decks than you might think.
The Message's Movies not my point. there is a reason nobody plays war golem, because that extra flair is what wins games in most cases. the fact that you have to play wiser just to play around 1 card (like sylvanas) kinda speaks for itself. if both players have equal skill, the one with better cards typically wins.
I would agree if Hunter and Zoo weren't most popular and successful decks on ladder. Also they require almost no dust (only few wings of Naxx)
You gotta make an updated version when the new Expansion drops
This video is a Hearthstone classic
You should add reno jackson and it would be actually pretty good
+Tint dis was posted long time ago ..
He made a new one, and Reno is in it, as well as some old gods legendaries
Missed lethal at 10:30 he could have Alexstraza and then attack full face,altough there might have been a chance for mogor to do his effect
I remember when TB did this, and he actually had a bit of success with it. I think he went pally, too, with his.
This does not prove anything. If you are dumb enough to make a shit deck with minimal synergy and bad cards, then of course you will lose. Just having a few legends can really change the game in your favor if your opponent has none.
I know, hes just saying this. If legendarys didnt make you better then people wouldnt use it.
Andrés Guerra Yes lets mention the one OP deck that the entire community hates to prove a point. Name 2-3 more decks that don't require legendary and can get to legendary.
Andrés Guerra The community hates it means it's the exception, as in abusing the flaws of the game. what "basic" paladin deck? what paladin deck doesn't use tirion lol. What priest deck doesn't use legendary. You say "some", never any specific deck. Not combo , not chinese, not control. Mill druid CANT get to legend unless you're one of the few pros who can get to legend w/ basically any deck. I've tested it various time and with an aggro meta, it's just suicide to play mill anything. Even against oil rogue or freeze mage, by turn 3-4 they'd already know your deck. I have nothing against legendary, but I can understand newplayer's frustrations. You need to have a fair amount of cards(most rare and some epic) to build a decent deck that can climb to rank 3-5. For new players, arena is a waste of money. They're forced to play ranked against scums who farm wins at rank 20. Btw, idk where you get the math for 3000 G from wins/month. say you play constructed, you'd need 9000 wins(sounds dumb already?). Say you have 50% win rate, you'd need 18000 games, each game averaging 10 minutes, that's 180000 minutes = 3000 hours = 300 hr/day.
Andrés Guerra Lol abuse the flaws of the game as in lack of viable cards that speed up late game. Only known cards are emperor and nourish, both can only be played way into the mid game, and by then it's too late.
a deck that only uses basic cards and gets into legend. Sounds like a deck not even Kolento can use to get to legend. Let's face it for pros like trump, even with switching between VIABLE decks based on meta(& even resorting to patron, which we know is OP), getting to legend is a grind. i don't care about bots, as in if it proves anything.
And no mill druid cannot get to legend lol. It does use volcanic lumberer, in case u didn't know, comboing with starfall/poison seed. It cannot deal w/ aggressive decks lol. It has absolutely no minion, except keeper and other higher cost minions. You definitely don't want to play oracle or grove tender against aggro, especially on turn 3, obv because then they'd know you're a mill druid. Mill druid is only ok against noob face hunters. Btw, you don't sound like you've ever gotten to legend(just saying). You seem to not understand the mechanics of the decks.
About the gold calculation, obviously I didn't read carefully. Nevertheless, 60 matches a day is not viable lol. That's roughly 15 hours STRAIGHT OF PLAYING. Even streamers don't play that much, and it's THEIR JOB. You'd have to have no life to do that. A good estimate for a new player is at least 1 year for him to have decent cards to play constructed. That is if the guy is patient enough to keep playing.
I have 10 legendaries without paying ;)
My name is Jori Pasterino, brother of eddi pasterino, and I seriously regret starting "skipperino Kripperino". Now, whenever I go into the comments section, I cringe when someone copy pastes my comment and substitutes the time at which Kripp stops talking. Please, no pasterino! Also, 1:53 to not listen to kripp.
Dang time really flies
This is TotalBiscuit's baby.
Can you get to legend rank without any naxx or legendary cards?
no, naxx is mandatory
dude all naxx legendary is shit accept from lothab also KT is ok as well
Belcher is also ok.
Mathieu Poulin i guess you could play sunwalker in the place of sludge belcher but i would definitely at a minimum get first two wings of nax for belcher/loatheb and first wing of blackrock for emperor
***** Trump did it before any expansions...
10:13
he has lethal with alex?
steve vansteenbrugge lol i thought i was the only one who saw that
steve vansteenbrugge not with the 50% chance to miss from the ogre
kYSMIGlolTV It'd still take the chance tho
+kYSMIGlolTV he took the chance at the end anyway
Legendary Spells would be a great addition
Nice video dude! Makes me want to start using an all legendary deck:) Actually, don't even think I have that many yet... haha
Kripp,p2w doesent mean to have full deck of leggies.You can have only good ones like rag,cairne,sylv,n'zoth and stuff and others like epics/rares or even commons because they're good most of the time.Still hearthstone is p2w,no argue.
what does he say at 4:34 he says its a kwazai taunt? what does that mean?
It IS a pay2win, you pay for the most top deck at the moment (Mech-mage) (Rush-ranger) or whatever is in the time and... tadá, you are wining 75% of your games at least. Deal with it.
(I love you Kripp)
it is good feeling when you have 30 legendaryes in deck
actually, if you put in sneed's old shredder you have 31 legendaries in your deck (of course if it isn't silenced)
10:29 HE HAD LETHAL, HE HAD LETHAL, ALEXTRAZA!!!
+Minjune Seo not really tho, if mogar fucked the attacks up it wouldnt be
+Joakim Paldanius (Wrikke) Oh sorry, didn't see mogor the fucker :P
You can't get golden Gelbin anymore. It's one of two cards that you can never collect in this game, rendering the game pointless for collectors.
wow first turn and kripp destroyed the whole map
We don't say you have to have every legendary to do good, but you do need SOME and it IS pay to win since you need a certain set of cards since the more options you have the better you can create your deck.
super-special-sniper-comberino
wonderful
Have you attempted to look at totalbiscuits legendary deck?
Lmfao at the pokemon reference in the start, kind of backhand insulting the dude, haha.
Couldn't he at 10:05 use Alexstrazza and set remaining HP to 15 and then just attack and win?
all minions have a 50% chance of missing their target, so he could've won, but their was a chance he might not
All of them (-Recruit) would have to hit. The chances of that are 12.5%
This deck really needs TBK. It allows you to punish druid decks that invest their whole turn on a big taunt. This allows you to gain back some of the tempo you lose in the early game. The games I win with 30 legends is often turn 6 TBK, turn 7 Boom, turn 8 KT.
This follow-up works really well because when you stabilize with TBK you are still at a somewhat healthy life total. By turn 6 the opponent has seen maybe 3 or 4 cards (ALL legends), so they usually know what's going on. They know Dr. Boom, Ragnaros, Tirion and friends are coming so they want to finish you off asap. They sometimes even ignore the Boom Bots because they are scared of your legends or they answer your Dr. Boom with THEIR Dr. Boom (which obviously is the dream with KT in your hand).
Also, if you add TBK, you might want Toshley. It allows you to kill non-taunt minions if you get Rusty Horn. Probably too cute though.
Topdeck and Rekt
#2VerbsThatWillMakeYouSalty
#shrekt
9:54 What did you think of this laugh? Press 1 for Fake, 2 for Girly, 3 for Awkward.
10:17 to skip to a random part of the video
Kripp is a smart guy and Blizz appreciates him, as we do, so take this with a grain of salt.
Hearthstone is not Pay2Win - it is like League of Legends, you can reach maximum potential faster by spending cash.
Everybody knows that e.g. a Control Warrior without legendaries is weaker than same Warrior with the usual goodies.
You forgot about the Lorewalker Cho, Millhouse Manastorm combo
One thing that makes Total Biscuits Hearthstone videos so enjoyable is that he will throw odd decks into ranked, and talk about the process. This would be much better if you did the same. I really enjoy you're explanations of choice at the start of your videos. But watching you play is kind of dull.
can you try this idea again when the new expansion come out?
ever thoguht about making a warror spellcaster deck with the new random hit until it kill an enemy minion and pyromancer? with slam and others.. i think it could work right..
"You end up milling yourself with this deck"
*Still plays Pagle
everytime my opponent plays a legendary I cry a little (started playing about a month ago)
LOL
Even if it's Millhouse?
Ramón Elbal Ruiz especially if it's Millhouse
Alfredo Lopez Because you only have purify/Hunter's mark, right?
makes me wonder i you play milhouse and loetheb in the same turn what happens
Hearthstone isn't pay to win, but I'll concede that the grind to finish solo adventures is pretty crazy.
Starts at 5:21
Make series from that on every Hero Pls.
Why not have Mukla in the deck? Wouldn't it be good to have some slightly improved early game? Just a though.
What should i replace the legendaries with ?
Millhouse is OP in that format since no one has any spells.
Kripp trolling hard in this vid.
5:18 gameplay
Grim Guzzler at Blackrock Mountain would still be funnywith full legend deck :D
Why loatheb and millhouse and cho without any spells :'
Felzx Milhouse is good without any spells. Cho and Loatheb I dunno...
+PlushNightingale Loatheb is also pretty solid without any spells. When you're limited to only playing legendaries, a vanilla 5/5 for 5 isn't too bad.
how much money do u have to spend to get into legendary
+Christian Haley None, I reach legendary almost every month and I'm f2p.
+FucKtArD Which deck are you playing?
+Walter Schmidt At the time of my comment control warrior, now i play a lot of evolve shamen (reached rank 4 last season)
Thank you man, would you give me a deck advice for a budget player like you too? Would you recommend your deck?
Walter Schmidt Would reccomend you to buy some of the adventures (with real money or gold)
I think they should start makeing legendary weapons And for those classes that dont hold wepons make some kind of legendary shield wonder if it would work. No im not saying it should fully happen but just a thought on how they could make that work
sooo, how much did you spend all in all on this free game?
You had lethal at 10:07 Alextrazza him and minions for kill
You forget about Mogor, it was sorta lethal, he wanted to secure the win
now with new legendarys maybe you shall do this again?
TB already did that. Kripp must have played thought steal on him...
I feel like the arena is a great cycle to open packs, and get more gold, to play more, and open more packs. However, Im a beginning player, just got my first 100 wins, so I have no idea if I should do arena, or how to.
why no leeroy for finisher?
he had lethal at 10:14 used that card with changes someones health to 15 and attack face
5:20 skipperino kripperino talkerino
It is pay to win. You have to have all the cards to keep up with the meta. If you don't you will not get far.
***** Do you use cancer?
Ricardo Dias I'm not complaining. I was just making a point. When did you start playing because that matters too.
All thought i was wrong you don't need all the cards. You just need a majority of the good ones. About 75%.
I also went for shaman as my first class. And well shaman is trash now.
at 12:20 he missed lethal?
Can you do a new 30 legendary deck?
8:19 LOOK AT KRIPP`S FACE LOL
strange that there are no legendary spells(even tho there is a legendary weapon in form of ashbringer)
Tinkmaster + Hemet combo in constructed comming in 3...2...1...
try doing a keltuzad sneeds baron rivendale combo
could have won at 10:20 with Alextraza? could he have?
Arake Dacross mogor
12:00 you had alexstrasza in your hand!! You could have destroyed him already there loll.
this guy reminds me of Sips so much
One time when I was 18 I came home from school. I shouted to announce that I was home when I heard a noise from my kitchen. As I entered the kitchen I noticed my dad standing there with his meat in my GF! A grill that I had a close relationship with through many years. I was outraged, as it was my personal grill and I had told him to use the Weber-grill instead of my George Foreman grill, as the GF had just recently been cleaned.
I believe this has already been done before by Totalbiscuit
no Illidan? Why does everyone hate Illidan, I love that card.
Why do you think?! Because they are NOT prepared!
Blayne Robinson I actually don't own the card, sadly.
THEY ARE NOT PREPARED
***** Peace* you scumbag learn how to spell.
Because everyone who plays this game are tryhards illdan was the first card i crafted its so much fun
Once I played Ancestor call shaman. The 30 legendary Druid beat me easily, so it can be great. :P
Kripp you could have alexstrazad face and hoped all hits goes to face for lethal
10:05 you actually had lethal with Alexstraza
what does Kappa mean?
This is different tho, it's even matched for you cause you guys have legendarys in a quantity, while people who don't are at a major disadvantage, and the disadvantage makes it a pay to play
that a short centipede if it only HAS 30 LEGS
When you have 30 legs you should call the deck the paladin centipede.
More of these videos!
I just realised, there's no spells at all in this deck
I bet the 30 legendary deck will do better now.
5:16 to skip talk
why isnt he playing alexx in round 9 and finishing him in the face @ 10:45
5:41-6:00 dat devastation tho
5:14 Skip
im playing for like 1.5 year but seldom.. the only legednary i have is lord jaraxus (besides some pve legendaries)
It's not pay2win, it's pay2advance. Cards don't make you "win" more, they just give you more options over your opponent. Of course you can't play a fully-evolved Control Warrior until veeeery late into your Hearthstone career, but there are a lot more archetypes that require no legendaries whatsoever. You can get to Legend with a fairly basic deck, the thing that really takes a long time is learning how to play properly, and by that time you probably have the cards you need already.
Pretty much. If people are going to cry that this is p2w then they'd lose their shit over real tcg/ccg where the only way to get cards is money or trading.
Oh god, sneeds shredder is one of the best cards in the game right now?!