Ten Things To Know About Pope Francis (George Weigel - Acton Institute)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 тра 2015
  • Since his election in 2013, Pope Francis has captured the world’s attention in ways unanticipated by many Catholics and other Christians. But who is Pope Francis, and where is he really taking the papacy and the Catholic Church? Why was he elected as the 266th successor of St. Peter? What surprises are likely to lie in store for us? Few are more qualified to discuss this topic than papal biographer, scholar and author, George Weigel. Author of numerous books, most notably the authoritative "Witness to Hope: The Biography of Pope John Paul II", Weigel is one of the most well-respected and knowledgeable commentators on the Catholic Church and the papacy today.
    Dr. George Weigel is an American author and political and social activist. He currently serves as a Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Weigel was the Founding President of the James Madison Foundation. He is the author of "Tranquillitas Ordinis: The Present Failure and Future Promise of American Catholic Thought on War and Peace" and "The Cube And The Cathedral."

КОМЕНТАРІ • 231

  • @danasmith3288
    @danasmith3288 5 років тому +4

    Doctrine . . . as taught by the Holy Fathers, and Scriptures drives the missionary mind-set. Doctrine that is learned and lived.

    • @edwardbaker1331
      @edwardbaker1331 8 місяців тому

      And not hated and ridiculed by a pope.

  • @ddeufemia
    @ddeufemia 6 років тому +11

    George co-authored a letter, not to back Donald Trump. He appeared on EWTN in an interview, titled; "Catholic Scholars Letter to Not Back Donald Trump,"on youtube. Hillary, the other choice, aka "The Culture of Death." I voted for the "Culture of Life" in accord with the teachings of the Church. The Queenship of the Blessed Virgin Mary 8/22/17
    '

    • @patsyk1213
      @patsyk1213 5 років тому +5

      I saw that letter; but did not know George Weigel co-authored it. That is really appalling! Trump has his faults. But compared to Hillary Clinton, Trump is an obviously better choice...even on moral grounds. Weigel's credibility is gone!

    • @edwardbaker1331
      @edwardbaker1331 8 місяців тому

      And then he lied about it years later claiming he only opposed Trump during the primaries when in fact those anti-Trump activities were in the final campaign.

  • @patsyk1213
    @patsyk1213 5 років тому +9

    George Weigel insults those who object to Francis' contradictions of traditional doctrines, dogmas and practices.

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      I'm frustrated by those people asserting their uninformed beliefs as if they were authoritative emerging from well-conducted research. Your simplistic judgmentalism is the real insult; a mere opinion based on unexamined but deeply held unexamined assumptions.

    • @edwardbaker1331
      @edwardbaker1331 8 місяців тому +1

      @@philipmirci3307 Your accusations can be directed towards yourself. How uninformed of you to have ignored the blatant heresies of Francis and his specific actions that have aided and abetted crimes against humanity.

  • @carolinenorman2654
    @carolinenorman2654 5 років тому +2

    Thanks for explaining the Latin term too many speakers quote the Latin and don’t explain .Very irritating.

  • @allansimoes8338
    @allansimoes8338 4 роки тому +2

    The Depression worse than 1929 is in the Makings . The Dollar is Toilet Paper.
    Allan.

  • @VictorLepanto
    @VictorLepanto 9 років тому +1

    Luv George Weigel!I am VERY glad to hear about the Card. Pell assignment.

  • @angelRodriguez-jb1pg
    @angelRodriguez-jb1pg 8 років тому +19

    Spoken like a true MODERNIST. 1hr.19.5 min. and didn't say anything. The conciliar sect must be proud of this guy.

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      You may have come across as being informed had you evidenced your understanding of MODERNISM - help people understand that anything that seems like a deviation from neo-scholastic theology is uncritically and simplistically put with actual Modernist unorthodoxies? You seem to be claiming that anything you disagree with is automatically a Modernist unorthodoxy.

  • @luiginocm
    @luiginocm 5 років тому +7

    I am a Catholic, who received doctrinal education leading to the first Holy Communion in 1966. So, teachings and Mass in Malta were still under Vetus Ordo at that time. Today the Church and Papacy are a joke.

    • @cosmicfugue1226
      @cosmicfugue1226 4 роки тому +2

      Hi brother Maltese... me too, just like you... I do not agree with both bishops of Malta who follow Cardinal Bergoglio. Benedict the XVI is still Pope as he was politely 'forced' to resign by pressuring him out. The election of Francis was invalid as it was influenced by a group of Mafia s who met at San Gallo in Switzerland. Viva Vetus Ordo... return to the Traditional Latin Mass.

    • @fuzzycounsellor9147
      @fuzzycounsellor9147 4 роки тому

      @@cosmicfugue1226 This is the church who hell won't prevail against?
      "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues." Revelation 18:4
      The papacy is the antiChrist, how can you not see that? Read your bible and ask God to give you understanding.

    • @uncatila
      @uncatila 2 роки тому +1

      @@fuzzycounsellor9147 you just a protestant floating around without a church. I think Weigle is out of touch but you are out to lunch.

    • @fuzzycounsellor9147
      @fuzzycounsellor9147 2 роки тому

      @@uncatila
      I wanted to thank you Pat for the complement, I'm sure it was heart felt & sincere.
      While I would like to respond to your argument, I'm unable to because you didn't seem to make one. Perhaps if you were to try really hard you might formulate a reason why you wanted to responded to my comment.
      Perhaps something I said made you realize you wanted to respond, but you thought only a kind word was appropriate to convey your feelings. But I wanted to let you know that it made my day.
      You have a lovely day as well Pat... ; )

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      Your simplistic and insulting comment is the real joke. Why not invest the time and energy necessary to explain your concerns rather than asserting "joke" that doesn't say anything and takes up other people's time?

  • @johannesnicolaas
    @johannesnicolaas 9 років тому +32

    Ah George, you want to make Francis a conservative because it suits you.... but politically he is a radical. You can spin so much as you can, but it is as it is. Deal with it.

    • @Haramita3
      @Haramita3 9 років тому +3

      johannesnicolaas I agree that the Pope is radical. He preaches that you should embrace the Gospel of Jesus Christ with your whole heart and mind and follow all of the teachings of the Church he founded. Nothing is more radical than that.

    • @salvelinusfontinalis664
      @salvelinusfontinalis664 9 років тому +5

      Haramita3 antipope Francis

    • @martinmoller5591
      @martinmoller5591 9 років тому +6

      Haramita3 He hates Christ and the gospel. This is radical Evil!

    • @MrAquinas1
      @MrAquinas1 7 років тому +2

      Harimita3: Baloney. He has clearly treated the moral truths of Christ as rigidity.

    • @MrAquinas1
      @MrAquinas1 7 років тому +2

      Herdewelle: So you're going to deny the Kasper-like process theology he has promoted? His insistence that God is in process of learning how to be a good God over time? His insistence that those who believe in a perfect God are so out of touch with the real God they are atheists?

  • @darrinfrench9018
    @darrinfrench9018 6 років тому +19

    George, the verdict is out; Pope Francis has fast become the most progressive Pope in human history! I pray for his soul for he is a deeply troubled man. When global warming debates become vital and the salvation of souls has been reduced to almost nothing, the Church is in
    trouble. Soon, the faithful will either find it fit to follow traditional values that are hard wired in Christentum or follow a demise of errors -too many to list here.

    • @Rustsamurai1
      @Rustsamurai1 5 років тому

      I wish to return to the Catholic Church, and would have ...but for this Pope.

    • @leeshang4926
      @leeshang4926 5 років тому +1

      Pope francis do not against satan he is not saint

    • @kccox8516
      @kccox8516 4 роки тому

      Darrin French
      Pope Francis is the leader he's chosen to be!
      He has caused alot of heartache and confusion. His support for sodomy in the church, and his support for child molestation are pathetic. I doubt he has an ear for the One True God. He listens to another voice.

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      Were you serious when you stated that you pray for the soul of the Pope? You asserted "he is a deeply troubled man" without providing any information upon which you made your judgment. Are you a psychiatrist or psychologist given your diagnosis of the man as being deeply troubled? Your moral superiority and judgmentalism is tiresome.

    • @darrinfrench9018
      @darrinfrench9018 Рік тому

      Progressive like you have no clue of what reality is.
      I have no need to explain anything to such a naive and misled person such as yourself

  • @gsmcconnell
    @gsmcconnell 8 років тому +1

    bit dated but good analysis of the peoples.............pope!

    • @MrAquinas1
      @MrAquinas1 4 роки тому

      Which people? All the world's anti-Catholic bigots? Why would they need a pope? They already have Satan.

  • @KBurchfiel
    @KBurchfiel 6 років тому +4

    Really solid talk. He does a good job at presenting the Pope as he is, not merely as some people want (or fear) him to be.

  • @nifty1940
    @nifty1940 7 років тому +6

    "Pope Francis leads from the heart (emotion) whilst his two predecessors led from the head (reason)"? Surely, this is a worry? If his modernistic pastoral emotions, dictates over reason in protecting Church Dogma, then, this too, is a major worry. Is this Weigel's way of ameliorating an ever increasing anxiety that this Pope is allowing his concerns for poverty, neglect and an all inclusive pastoral views to create errors; or, merely a discourse on a Pope's nature, character and ecological viewpoint, borne (the man, not the Head of a Holy Catholic Church) from his experience which, includes poverty stricken conditions? But this talk smacks more of an apologist's view of a Pope increasingly viewed with suspicion from a growing number of Catholics concerned with his "interpretive" doctrine. Christ's Words are all-inclusive truth - they have NO ambiguity. They are NOT up for interpretation, they are to be upheld and exhorted, and especially by THE Bishop of Rome, the POPE, not the MAN. Centuries of far greater men, and women have already defined this.

    • @bluewrenreilly129
      @bluewrenreilly129 6 років тому

      I too in my humble assessment of Pope Francis, I thought he had become too embroiled in the problems of the people's poverty and hard lives in his country of origin.Felt it was his responsibility to find a solution and has crumbled under the burden of his old age and encroaching death and lack of worldly solutions, except for a wholesale bowing to Marxism also the influence of the NWO open borders etc.His capitulation to abject humility is ok for his time of life but it does nothing to solve the problems of life and faith to hand on for the rest of us.Does it?

    • @maureen348
      @maureen348 4 роки тому

      If he led any where it would be a help,he zig zags all over the place.The choice is he knows what he is doing,thats my choice, then he is the prophesied false prophet.Or he is mentally ill.He has such success in causing confusion it must be part of a bigger plan. If you go on line asking did pope francise honour Italy,s leading abortionist,you,ll be shocked

    • @MrAquinas1
      @MrAquinas1 2 роки тому +2

      His crimes against humanity are not exactly "leading from the heart."

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      Your statement evidences your ignorance regarding the theology of this Pope, the Pope's deep commitment to Catholicism, and his life's ministry as a true pastor. Capitalizing words reveals your ego-centric moral judgmental superiority. Sure, this is a worry! People approach serious and complex issues with your uninformed beliefs are harming the Church. Shame on you.

    • @nifty1940
      @nifty1940 Рік тому

      @@philipmirci3307 5 years on, and still Bergoglio deludes. What does it take to to remove the veil from your eyes? Uninformed! The only shame I feel is how Bergoglio, and his cadre clerics, have betrayed their Master, and the faithful, have left 70% of American "catholic's" no longer believing in transubstantiation, churches, and parishes closed, holdings sold off, hiding sexual scandals, persecuting and cancelling good and faithful priests, modernism and liberalism, idolatries, a wink and a nod to Luther, a One World ecumenical religion, etc. I think this is more than a "Sure, this is a worry". I'll pray for your blindness.

  • @merrittjohnson3590
    @merrittjohnson3590 9 років тому +2

    Dancing around the daisies. As in pushing up the daisies. You get to kiss the ring!

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      What are you saying? It doesn't make any sense.

  • @Philosophia-cf8qd
    @Philosophia-cf8qd 6 років тому +4

    "Call me Jorge" is an abomination. Period.

  • @odaily
    @odaily 8 років тому +1

    919 days

  • @feliceboccella8191
    @feliceboccella8191 6 років тому

    Una buona bottiglia di vino sì si continua mettere acqua dentro diventa acqua sporca

  • @tolethom
    @tolethom 9 років тому +5

    The analysis is conservative biased. Pope Francis is a rupture in many ways, especially when talking about poverty. He points to the causes of poverty and the need for liberation of the poor...
    It is not a matter of opinion and analysis, it is all written in Evangelli Gaudium...
    On gay issues, the pastoral approach of the (then) Archbishop of Buenos Aires was to accompany people and not condemn them.... Which clearly indicates the respect for the individual conscience. This was also said in an interview where he said that the Church cannot "interfere in the spiritual lives" of LGBT people...
    His approach and message are clear, but many conservatives tend to refuse to conform to the pope´s ideas...

    • @oneonta310
      @oneonta310 9 років тому +1

      Yhe pope is not a "progressive." He isnt changing anything.

    • @tolethom
      @tolethom 9 років тому +3

      Christian Herrera If you think this Pope hasn´t changed anything already, you are just denying the reality.

    • @oneonta310
      @oneonta310 9 років тому

      tolethom are you catholic? i'm just curious.

    • @tolethom
      @tolethom 9 років тому

      Christian Herrera Yes

    • @kneeltojesus8600
      @kneeltojesus8600 9 років тому +3

      tolethom Why do you think that anyone should conform to the pope's ideas? There is only One leader in the Christian Church, His name is Jesus.

  • @darrinfrench9018
    @darrinfrench9018 6 років тому +2

    Why does it take over an hour to say what most people can say in 10 minutes ? That is why I do not purchase Georges books.

  • @angelmoraledagh1635
    @angelmoraledagh1635 6 років тому +4

    What a pity! Mr. Weigel intentionally gives us an irreal outline of Pope Francis personality.

  • @childrenragift
    @childrenragift 6 років тому +7

    Intellectials always have to talk so much to say anything. Come on George say something. Pope Francis the first is terrible for the truth. Our Holy? Father? Iz tryin to 2 chop down our faith.

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      Sounds like you dismiss much of what someone says by claiming intellectualism. Your short sentences are ambiguous assertions without any statements to explain your claim. How is Pope Francis "terrible for the truth?" What precisely has he said and done that "cuts down our faith?" Pope Francis believes, teaches, and lives that Jesus is the fullest revelation of God - this fundamental claim is consistent with both Vatican I and Vatican II. He possesses a deep devotion to Mary. He has a depth of knowledge about the history of the Church. I can't figure out what you are thinking: you make claims without explaining them

  • @TakeUsHomeYeshua
    @TakeUsHomeYeshua 9 років тому +4

    FOS!!

  • @rosefernandes6252
    @rosefernandes6252 6 років тому +1

    I wish somebody cud hav asked the question as to ' Why did the Catholic Church elect a Jesuit to be a Pope '?
    According to the Roman Catholic Dogma, apparently no Jesuit shud NEVER be elected Pope of our Catholic Church. So what happened? As Hillery Clinton asks?

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      Rose, I can't begin to respond because what you wrote doesn't make sense. Are you saying that Catholic Dogma forbids electing a Jesuit to the position of Pope? Is that what you are saying? Where did you get such an idea? Why are you of the opinion that a Jesuit should NEVER be elected Pope? Have you thought about how your response would have been different and you actually studied the history of the Roman Catholic Church?

  • @leeshang4926
    @leeshang4926 5 років тому

    Jerusalem new temple will build, there will has the holy ark of the covenant after not catholic,any one no catholic people read the holy bible

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      Do you think that people who read what you wrote understood what you said? Instead of wasting the time of the reader of your statements, you could ask someone to "proof-read" your work and help you write sentences that people will be able to understand.

  • @kaykay3585
    @kaykay3585 5 років тому +3

    Was this man paid to make the speech?

  • @rexmasters7592
    @rexmasters7592 5 років тому +2

    The Pope may be Biblically illiterate , but what a smile, when the cameras are rolling.

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      How does your sarcasm contribute to a discussion?

    • @edwardbaker1331
      @edwardbaker1331 11 місяців тому +1

      @@philipmirci3307 A great deal to illustrate the two faced phoniness of Francis.

  • @RobertWilliam-yu8gi
    @RobertWilliam-yu8gi 9 років тому +5

    Rome is anathema for preaching another gospel of salvation by works.
    The Roman Catholic cult in their Catechism teaches that we can merit grace necessary for salvation and that eternal life is attained by baptism, sacraments, and keeping the commandments.
    1. CCC 2010, "...Moved by the Holy Spirit and by charity, we can then merit for ourselves and for others the graces needed for our sanctification, for the increase of grace and charity, and for the attainment of eternal life."
    2. CCC 2027, "Moved by the Holy Spirit, we can merit for ourselves and for others all the graces needed to attain eternal life, as well as necessary temporal goods."
    3. CCC 2068, "The Council of Trent teaches that the Ten Commandments are obligatory for Christians and that the justified man is still bound to keep them;28 the Second Vatican Council confirms: "The bishops, successors of the apostles, receive from the Lord . . . the mission of teaching all peoples, and of preaching the Gospel to every creature, so that all men may attain salvation through faith, Baptism and the observance of the Commandments."
    This obviously faulty teaching in the CCC is hugely problematic since it contradicts Scripture.
    1. Rom. 3:28-30, "For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. 29Or is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, 30since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one."
    2. Rom. 4:3, "For what does the Scripture say? "And Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness."
    3. Rom. 4:5, "But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness,"
    4. Rom. 5:1, "therefore having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ."
    5. Rom. 11:6, "But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise grace is no longer grace."
    6. Gal. 2:16, "nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we may be justified by faith in Christ, and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law shall no flesh be justified."
    We have to ask questions.
    1. Why is the RCC teaching that you attain salvation through observing the commandments when the Bible says we are saved apart from the works of the Law (Rom. 3:28-30; 4:5; Gal. 2:16)?
    2. Why would the Roman Catholic Church teach that you merit for yourself the grace needed for eternal life when that clearly contradicts Rom 11:6? See also Matt 7:21-23.
    There is a great deal wrong with what the RCC teaches. We must look to God's word and not to what the RCC says we must do to be saved. Our salvation is not merited by our keeping the commandments! The Roman Catholic Church needs to repent.

    • @RobertWilliam-yu8gi
      @RobertWilliam-yu8gi 9 років тому

      ***** When YHWH Almighty say He creates a new creature He is not fooling around, neither is He a bad Father who can not raise His children as you suggest.
      Rom_8:21 Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.
      Rom_8:39 Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
      2Co_5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.

    • @Alvarado68
      @Alvarado68 8 років тому +2

      How is that anathema? That is simple basic historical Christianity. Sola fidei and sola scriptura is a Lutheran teaching from the early 16th century Germany.

    • @RobertWilliam-yu8gi
      @RobertWilliam-yu8gi 8 років тому

      Alvarado68
      Anathema is for the ones who are not predestined, please see Eph chapter one.
      Eph 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, To the saints who are in Ephesus, and are faithful in Christ Jesus:
      Eph 1:2 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.
      Eph 1:3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places,
      Eph 1:4 even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love
      Eph 1:5 he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will,
      Eph 1:6 to the praise of his glorious grace, with which he has blessed us in the Beloved.
      Eph 1:7 In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of his grace,
      Eph 1:8 which he lavished upon us, in all wisdom and insight
      Eph 1:9 making known to us the mystery of his will, according to his purpose, which he set forth in Christ
      Eph 1:10 as a plan for the fullness of time, to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth.
      Eph 1:11 In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will,
      Eph 1:12 so that we who were the first to hope in Christ might be to the praise of his glory.
      Eph 1:13 In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit,
      Eph 1:14 who is the guarantee of our inheritance until we acquire possession of it, to the praise of his glory.
      Eph 1:15 For this reason, because I have heard of your faith in the Lord Jesus and your love toward all the saints,
      Eph 1:16 I do not cease to give thanks for you, remembering you in my prayers,
      Eph 1:17 that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you the Spirit of wisdom and of revelation in the knowledge of him,
      Eph 1:18 having the eyes of your hearts enlightened, that you may know what is the hope to which he has called you, what are the riches of his glorious inheritance in the saints,
      Eph 1:19 and what is the immeasurable greatness of his power toward us who believe, according to the working of his great might
      Eph 1:20 that he worked in Christ when he raised him from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly places,
      Eph 1:21 far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come.
      Eph 1:22 And he put all things under his feet and gave him as head over all things to the church,
      Eph 1:23 which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all.

    • @dominiqueblagojevic9447
      @dominiqueblagojevic9447 8 років тому +2

      Jesus said cursed are those who take away from his word, or put anything else in....Sola scriptura.

    • @RobertWilliam-yu8gi
      @RobertWilliam-yu8gi 8 років тому +1

      Dominique Blagojevic
      Amen sister, it's so sad to see so many void of understanding scripture.

  • @DanGoodale1
    @DanGoodale1 8 років тому +5

    16,232 views in 9 months with 67 that believe you!! Pretty weak!!

    • @Alvarado68
      @Alvarado68 8 років тому +1

      Don't forget the 23 against.

    • @MrAquinas1
      @MrAquinas1 7 років тому +1

      Pretty dimwitted and shallow to treat popular approbation as validation.

  • @arrosconpollo1
    @arrosconpollo1 6 років тому +2

    I respect this guy but 1. Get to the point 2. Pope Francis is more radical than you would like to admit 3. The Jesuit Order is full of politically minded men that are more about their own leftist agenda than being supportive of the seat of Peter and supporting the traditions and teaching of the Catholic faith. 4. Their order has been inundated by agenda driven and career minded homosexuals that have changed the order from the great order it once was. The men of the cloth that cling to the old ways seem a a tiny minority of what this great order once was. I'm not an academic but this is in plain sight for anyone to see.

    • @lourdeslopez9335
      @lourdeslopez9335 5 років тому

      ' what was my file not

    • @lourdeslopez9335
      @lourdeslopez9335 5 років тому

      E

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      You dismiss people so easily with your labeling of people as "leftist" - rather than such simplistic assertions, state exactly what constitutes a "leftist agenda" in what he says and does. You seem to have no understanding of the Pope's pastoral sensibilities.

  • @rafaeldimasalang9715
    @rafaeldimasalang9715 4 роки тому

    I dont know where you coming from?

  • @vulcan1429
    @vulcan1429 7 років тому +6

    This is pure nonsense!

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      You could have created a guessing game with your exclamation. What do you mean by "nonsense"? What do your mean by "pure nonsense"? Do you not think that making incomprehensible statements is a waste of time on the part of your reader? The only thought I had at the end of reading your exclamation is that it was nonsense! Thank you.

  • @janetcaban7211
    @janetcaban7211 8 років тому +3

    POPE FRANCIS IS WALKING AND ACTING IN THE PLACE OF CHRIST! JESUS WENT OUT TO ALL SINNERS AS HE GAVE HOPE TO THE SAMARITAN WOMAN. IT IS TIME TO SHARE CHRIST MERCY TO ALL ESPECIALLY THE POOR. WEIGEL IS CONFUSED!

    • @Alvarado68
      @Alvarado68 8 років тому +2

      +Rakesh A. Just like We should sell the White House, the Capitol bldg, the Grand Canyon and national parks to private investors to help with poverty and the national debt. Are you atheist or an anti-catholic and if so which do you specifically belong too?

    • @clivejames5058
      @clivejames5058 8 років тому

      well said Alvarado68 - Nancy Arias has no idea of the revenue that is generated by the art works of the Vatican which go to its extensive charities - if she did any real research she'd see that!

    • @nvateach1
      @nvateach1 8 років тому +1

      Alvarado68 Anti-evil and anti-catholic is one in the same.

    • @geomusicmove
      @geomusicmove 7 років тому +1

      So only the catholic church should sell her goods, not the synagogue and the jewish state of Israel, or the Islamic kingdoms, only the church. And sell it to who, a charity run by atheists, freemasons and Jews so they'll distribute they loot among the poor of the world? LOL some people have a pea for a brain.

    • @MrAquinas1
      @MrAquinas1 7 років тому +1

      Janet Caban; It has always been time to preach the mercy of Christ. Only someone committing the sin of pride would pretend they are doing anything unique or original in this regard. Pope Francis is not in any way merciful to anyone who demonstrates resistance to seeing him as superior to all ecclesial authority that preceded him. The good Samaritan was a man by the way.

  • @michaell.diveley9279
    @michaell.diveley9279 6 років тому

    St. John Paul II my ass

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      Michael, what are you saying? Are you saying that John-Paul II should not have been canonized? What does John Paul II have to do with your ass? Are you saying that you are an ass for not explaining what you mean? I honestly would have appreciated knowing what you meant

  • @marthareynoso9613
    @marthareynoso9613 7 років тому +3

    The Antichrist would be a Jewish, not a Pope. This Pope Francis is great!

    • @MrAquinas1
      @MrAquinas1 Рік тому

      You manage to be both an anti-semite and an anti-Catholic bigot.

  • @cosmicfugue1226
    @cosmicfugue1226 4 роки тому

    Lousy speaker who doesn't even know what he' saying... Emmanuel from The Maltese Islands, Europe.

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      I doubt readers of your response have an accurate clue as to what you are saying. This is because what you wrote isn't described enough to make sense. My opinion is that you have done nothing more than shared your disorganized thinking.

  • @DIGIVOXJ23
    @DIGIVOXJ23 9 років тому +3

    OLD FASHIONED JESUIT: The Extreme Jesuit Oath of Induction: '...I do further promise and declare, that notwithstanding I am dispensed with, to assume my religion heretical, for the propaganda of the Mother Church's interest, to keep secret and private all her agents' counsels from time to time, as they may entrust me and not to divulge, directly or indirectly, by word, writing or circumstance whatever; but to execute all that shall be proposed, given in charge or discovered unto me, by you, my ghostly father, or any of this sacred covenant.
    I do further promise and declare, that I will have no opinion or will of my own, or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver (perinde ac cadaver), but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the Militia of the Pope and of Jesus Christ.
    That I may go to any part of the world withersoever I may be sent, to the frozen regions of the North, the burning sands of the desert of Africa, or the jungles of India, to the centers of civilization of Europe, or to the wild haunts of the barbarous savages of America, without murmuring or repining, and will be submissive in all things whatsoever communicated to me.
    I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants' heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.
    In confirmation of which, I hereby dedicate my life, my soul and all my corporal powers, and with this dagger which I now receive, I will subscribe my name written in my own blood, in testimony thereof; and should I prove false or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the Militia of the Pope cut off my hands and my feet, and my throat from ear to ear, my belly opened and sulphur burned therein, with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth and my soul be tortured by demons in an eternal hell forever!' HE IS A FRAUD and a GENOCIDAL MURDERER at the HEAD OF THE BEAST. 'The Beast' is The VATICAN.

    • @BeniPali
      @BeniPali 9 років тому +1

      DIGIVOXJ23 you are an piece of idiot...nameless and faceless and for sure a jew

    • @MrAquinas1
      @MrAquinas1 6 років тому

      You're an idiot to suggest he is a jew. Jews are not stupid. He is arguing against his own conclusion, very a very protestant mindset. He claims Jesuits are mindlessly loyal to Catholicism in critiquing a Jesuit pope who has many people upset because of his opposition to Catholicism.

  • @mellieberry6841
    @mellieberry6841 3 роки тому

    Sorry you guys on the wrong side ... the Anti church of pope Francis

    • @philipmirci3307
      @philipmirci3307 Рік тому

      Mellie, do you honestly believe that anyone understands what you have written? What does "being on the wrong side" look like? What do you mean? What do you mean when you use the word "Anti church"? Do you not think that remaining silent is a better choice instead of wasting people's time with statements that don't make any sense? Thank you