Porsche Panamera Turbo S e-Hybrid Executive
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
- Porsche’s new Panamera flagship delivers incredible power, giving it supercar-rivalling performance. Its combination of electric and turbo petrol power, along with a shedload of chassis management systems, means the this grand tourer has genuine driving talent. It’s also a competent all-rounder, meaning that when you’re not blasting through some challenging corners, you can relax in a brilliant cabin offering top class luxury and spec.
VITAL STATS
Make and model: Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Exec
Combustion engine: 3 996cc V8, twin-turbo petrol
Electric motor: 14.1 kWh electric motor
Power (petrol/electric): 404 kW @ 5 750 - 6 000 rpm / 100 kW @ 2 800 rpm
Torque (petrol/electric): 770 Nm @ 1 960 - 4 500 rpm / 400 Nm @ 100 - 2 300 rpm
Total System Power: 500 kW @ 5 750 - 6 000 rpm
Total System Torque: 850 Nm @ 1 400 - 5 500 rpm
Power-to-weight ratio: 216,45 kW/ton
Gearbox: Eight-speed PDK dual-clutch, AWD
Wheels/tyres: 21-inch alloy, 275/35 R21 tyres (f), 325/30 R21 tyres (r)
0-100 km/h: 3,4 sec
Top speed: 310 km/h
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres
Fuel consumption (claimed): 2,9 litres/100km
Operating range (claimed): 2 759 km
CO2 emissions: 66 g/km
PROS
Supercar power and performance.
CONS
Advanced chassis tech blunts some driver involvement.
Retail price / as tested: R3 134 000/R3 134 000
Key rivals
Audi RS7 Sportback quattro: R1 757 000
BMW M6 Gran Coupé Competition: R2 130 668
It's a technological masterpiece.
This is the future.
Very nice review! I appreciate huge amount of information you provided.
Spike Ballentine. *Sp* I have always loved your review.. Your mate does a pretty good job as well. What a pair. Ignition should air your clips. Well done. Keep it up.
Great review.
Would have loved a mention of real world fuel consumption. Also, perhaps just me but the music is louder than the voice
Why is battery powered cars the future. What about hydrogen?
There is quite a bit of work going on around development of hydrogen power, and it's certainly not off the table, but it would appear that most motor manufacturers believe that electric vehicles are a more realistic target in the 'short' term. Also, batteries are improving all the time, and establishing a charging infrastructure will be less complex that creating a network of safe, user-friendly hydrogen refuelling facilities.
With electric cars, the energy can be generated in a huge number of ways - some clean (wind, solar, etc), but also many other ways - coal, wood burning, wave, gas, nuclear..... Thats not the case with Hydrogen - which currently requires some fossil fuels to creat the Hydrogen.
Hydrogen is explosive