I’d argue that the new version of content creator-type feederism without an individual feeder is driven by anonymous viewers with the same motivations.
So I appreciate that you went into creating some necessary distinctions in this video. Such as the "feederism" is more or less a spectrum. There are extremes. Unfortunately most people only know of it from the more extreme adherents and place a great stigma on it. I can also appreciate that you looked into some of the academic literature on the topic. But it may have served well in fairness and charity to have talked with some members of the community. Colloquially the general public, and some of academia (not all because quite a few have interviewed members of the community) refer to it as feederism. However adherents and the community at large refer to it as feedism. There are many in the community that do actually aim to give support so as to avoid those power imbalances. But like any group or community there are individuals and agents who are unfortunately abusive. Both for feeders and feedees. I can say that from experience. Although I should note that abuse from a feedee is typically rarer then it probably is with feeders. You have been careful, but at the same time somewhat careless. There are plenty within the community who are philosophers, lawyers, and academics who do engage in critical thinking about these topics. Many have created and established rigorous systemic moral and ethical frameworks around it. I am just disappointed that you ultimately didn't engage with those points of view. Yes what you do state are genuine concerns. They should be discussed and debated. Unfortunately you didn't do much to further the discussion as someone from the outside looking in. Just seemingly are capitalizing and furthering the stigma that surrounds many of us in that community. It serves no one well to be overly reductive on these points. Granted its a pretty vast subculture so I don't begrudge you not knowing on the many intricacies surrounding it. But there are plenty of resources online from this community, from Tumblr to the forums.
All anyone needs to know is that everything involving this fetish in steeped in ILLNESS. Those who have the disease of obesity with mental disorders that leads them to be addicted to food and ultimately groomed into this fetish, and the individuals who derive xesual gratification from feeding someone until they are bedbound. NONE of it is sane, or safe in any capacity. If a stigma exists surrounding this community, it's for a very good reason.
I’d argue that the new version of content creator-type feederism without an individual feeder is driven by anonymous viewers with the same motivations.
Thank you for covering this serious and deadly practice. ♥️ mm
So I appreciate that you went into creating some necessary distinctions in this video. Such as the "feederism" is more or less a spectrum. There are extremes. Unfortunately most people only know of it from the more extreme adherents and place a great stigma on it. I can also appreciate that you looked into some of the academic literature on the topic. But it may have served well in fairness and charity to have talked with some members of the community.
Colloquially the general public, and some of academia (not all because quite a few have interviewed members of the community) refer to it as feederism. However adherents and the community at large refer to it as feedism.
There are many in the community that do actually aim to give support so as to avoid those power imbalances. But like any group or community there are individuals and agents who are unfortunately abusive. Both for feeders and feedees. I can say that from experience. Although I should note that abuse from a feedee is typically rarer then it probably is with feeders.
You have been careful, but at the same time somewhat careless. There are plenty within the community who are philosophers, lawyers, and academics who do engage in critical thinking about these topics. Many have created and established rigorous systemic moral and ethical frameworks around it. I am just disappointed that you ultimately didn't engage with those points of view.
Yes what you do state are genuine concerns. They should be discussed and debated. Unfortunately you didn't do much to further the discussion as someone from the outside looking in. Just seemingly are capitalizing and furthering the stigma that surrounds many of us in that community. It serves no one well to be overly reductive on these points. Granted its a pretty vast subculture so I don't begrudge you not knowing on the many intricacies surrounding it. But there are plenty of resources online from this community, from Tumblr to the forums.
All anyone needs to know is that everything involving this fetish in steeped in ILLNESS. Those who have the disease of obesity with mental disorders that leads them to be addicted to food and ultimately groomed into this fetish, and the individuals who derive xesual gratification from feeding someone until they are bedbound. NONE of it is sane, or safe in any capacity. If a stigma exists surrounding this community, it's for a very good reason.
Very insightful video.
There are big problems in the west amongst the people. Money makes people do questionable things and it’s quite sad to see Jelly doing such things.
nice video, im a legit feeder. sometimes a feedee. idk... but for me... feederism is like a mental sick... and yeah, i spend alot of money with it.
Mama needs Christmas money.. hit me up 😅😅😅🍔🍕🍟