Such a great informative video, I've always preferred raw even when I was first learning. I always preferred the look. Great comparison, thank you for showing the difference and not just talking about it! Great video 👍
With JPEG there are variations in how much you can edit depending on the software you use. Adobe seems to be able to extract more information from JPEG than other software makers.
Guess it very much depends on the subject. Your chosen examples are all unflattering. I shoot a lot in jpeg and if the situation is very important, challenging or unique raw+jpeg. Cityphotos, streetfotos and even portraits are very very well possible in jpeg. What helps a lot is making the picture as good as possible in-camera. That of course is also true for raw, but then it can be corrected easier. Post processing of jpeg, especially Fuji ,is very well possible with one exception: white balance.
Hi! Nice to hear from you. This is a very good question. I'm not actually sure which is better. My Nikon D3400 and D610 generate quite different raw files, too. I think I'm a bit better at working with Fuji files because I have spent more time on figuring out Fuji. Have a great day!
Hi! Indeed, I still have my Fuji X10. I don't use it very often but it's a pretty special camera. I think you'll find that the D700 is a very good camera. It's on the heavy side but this may not be a problem at all. Best of luck to you with your new camera!
Such a great informative video, I've always preferred raw even when I was first learning. I always preferred the look. Great comparison, thank you for showing the difference and not just talking about it! Great video 👍
Hi! Thank you so much. Kind regards!
With JPEG there are variations in how much you can edit depending on the software you use. Adobe seems to be able to extract more information from JPEG than other software makers.
Hi! Thank you for making this interesting point. What are your thoughts on using GIMP; have you tried it? Kind regards!
SILKYPIX is pretty good with JPEGs.
@@viktorpaulsen627 Hi! Good point. Thank you!
Guess it very much depends on the subject. Your chosen examples are all unflattering.
I shoot a lot in jpeg and if the situation is very important, challenging or unique raw+jpeg.
Cityphotos, streetfotos and even portraits are very very well possible in jpeg.
What helps a lot is making the picture as good as possible in-camera.
That of course is also true for raw, but then it can be corrected easier.
Post processing of jpeg, especially Fuji ,is very well possible with one exception: white balance.
Hi! Thank you for your feedback and comments. Kind regards!
Hi Tom, nice to hear from you, do you have to work your Raw files more on the Fuji than on the Nikon? Or is it the other way
Hi! Nice to hear from you. This is a very good question. I'm not actually sure which is better. My Nikon D3400 and D610 generate quite different raw files, too. I think I'm a bit better at working with Fuji files because I have spent more time on figuring out Fuji. Have a great day!
Hi Tom. Have you tried FUJIFILM X RAW STUDIO? You operate it from the PC while the camera is doing the processing.
Hi! Thanks for asking. Actually I've not used Fujifilm X Raw Studio. I've been planning to test it and I think I will very soon. Kind regards!
hi tom. are you still using the fuji x10? i sold the x10 to buy a nikon d700 dsrl. what do you think about this camera?
Hi! Indeed, I still have my Fuji X10. I don't use it very often but it's a pretty special camera. I think you'll find that the D700 is a very good camera. It's on the heavy side but this may not be a problem at all. Best of luck to you with your new camera!