I use the jpeg too and I modifie the jpeg too. But what you show on Gimp is a small revolution for me, above all the colors cuve. Thank you very much. I like very much your presentations, so cool, calm. Sorry for my english, I'm french.
I like your tip on lifting or lowering the middle of the tonal curve. In the olden days using much earlier versions of Photoshop I worked in channels more, and a trick I learned was to multiply the image as a Photoshop document. You could build up densities in washed out areas. And I always turn my jpegs into tiffs and then work on them. Of course if you're using a tripod you can bracket your exposure and combine them. I've done it without a tripod as I'm sure you have too.
@@tom_photo I'm not saying it's better than what you use currently, just wondered if you had used and has any thoughts. If you don't mind another- have you ever had images either raw or jpg to look kinda like a painting when you zoom in? This happens to me sometimes regardless of camera. D810, xt2
@@johnnylandry3226 Hi! Thanks for this question. This sounds interesting. What do you mean by painting? Are you going beyond pixel level? I guess if the dynamic range is compressed, then a photo can look a bit like a painting. If you explain more I might be able to comment more.
@@tom_photo I'm not looking past 100%. I actually was able to make a photo look a little more realistic by changing white balance from auto to daylight and that helped some. Like a painting would mean unrealistic. Like a cartoon maybe.
I use the jpeg too and I modifie the jpeg too. But what you show on Gimp is a small revolution for me, above all the colors cuve. Thank you very much. I like very much your presentations, so cool, calm. Sorry for my english, I'm french.
Hi! Thank you very much, I'm glad to read you found my video useful. Kind regards!
I like your tip on lifting or lowering the middle of the tonal curve. In the olden days using much earlier versions of Photoshop I worked in channels more, and a trick I learned was to multiply the image as a Photoshop document. You could build up densities in washed out areas. And I always turn my jpegs into tiffs and then work on them. Of course if you're using a tripod you can bracket your exposure and combine them. I've done it without a tripod as I'm sure you have too.
Hi! Thanks for these tips. All these methods are very useful. It was great to hear from you!
Ever use darktable?
Hi! I'm not a Darktable user. However I should check it out. Thanks for pointing it out. Kind regards!
@@tom_photo I'm not saying it's better than what you use currently, just wondered if you had used and has any thoughts.
If you don't mind another- have you ever had images either raw or jpg to look kinda like a painting when you zoom in? This happens to me sometimes regardless of camera. D810, xt2
@@johnnylandry3226 Hi! Thanks for this question. This sounds interesting. What do you mean by painting? Are you going beyond pixel level? I guess if the dynamic range is compressed, then a photo can look a bit like a painting. If you explain more I might be able to comment more.
@@tom_photo I'm not looking past 100%. I actually was able to make a photo look a little more realistic by changing white balance from auto to daylight and that helped some.
Like a painting would mean unrealistic. Like a cartoon maybe.
@@tom_photo sometimes you wouldn't have to even have to zoom in.
First
Hi! Thank you for watching. Kind regards!