Agreed. But what would you guys think of just cloning it out. Everything else Tom did was to bring out what he actually saw. But if he were to clone out the lake, that is too much in my opinion. It just goes too far.
Two ways to go here, depending on school of thought: Make it into 'fine art', clone it out that is. Or leave it as is and just decide its not the best composition... I think it is hard to see that it is an actual lake, first impression is that it is "noise".
@@anniebooo I think if you really want to keep the image its preference. I can keep the image with the lake. It's too much for me. I would have to remove it or scrap the shot. Again this is just my vision. Good thing about photography is you can like whatever you want. Personal taste is personal. It's his shot he can like it as it is.
This is a really interesting conversation thread. It goes to the heart of why we all do landscape photography in the first place. Personally I am an agnostic on whether people "should" alter their images for aesthetic reasons, as long as they are honest about it. Thomas is especially open about what he does to images and why, which is one of the reasons I am a loyal fan. In my opinion, the problem with the lake is that it is acting like a mirror in what is otherwise a well-composed image. About the only "natural" solution would be either to find a different vantage point or to come at a different time of year. I have often tried to tone down the surface of water, with varying success. Here I would make a high-precision mask for the reflective surface, starting with a luminosity mask and doing some careful hand feathering for the light coming through the trees. I might take shortcuts, but the easiest way to use such a mask is to add a layer group and attach the mask to the group. Within that group I would first add a layer to change the color of the surface from near-white to whatever I thought would be most natural. I would also add some ripples to break the surface up and provide texture. I would do this by hand, under high magnification, with a soft brush or pencil. Think carefully about what this surface would look like. It would darken near the shores. The smooth parts of the surface would mirror the gold of the sunlight and the ripples would have a hint of blue. A little goes a long way here. A skilled artist (not me) could do this with one or two strokes of an almost-dry brush. The layer group with one precision mask allows you to play as much as you want without worrying about boundaries. On a separate topic, there's also a lot of lens flare here all over the image, not just near the rising sun. That's just the way lenses work. I like the way Thomas has handled it. However, in a situation like this I would always use the best prime lens I could bring, even if I had to modify the overall composition to handle the focal length.
I haven't seen any other photographer in UA-cam being brutally honest with his work. Great job, makes me love your genuine content more and more. Keep it up!
Don't kill me, but for some reason (I guess simply personal taste) in some cases I do like the lens flare, and it is the case with this photo. Not always, but sometimes you can even play with it as a part of the composition. Just IMHO.
Proof that not all images can be made "in camera" photoshop is an extremely helpful tool and shouldn't be slated like it is by some who don't necessarily understand what can be done when using it. Great demo and image Thomas.
Beautiful final product Tom. A much needed diversion on my Sunday here across the pond. I can’t wait to try my first exposure stack... for that matter the focus stack too.
Lovely, as you say it, image, but I notice my eyes go to the reflected lake in the middle of the image. I was kind of surprised you didn't bring that up in the video, but you were so all over the lens flare. Also, my pre-order is in for the Calendar!
I like the photo, but that very bright lake in upper half is drawing my attention too much, plus it is quite rugged while the rest of the sceene is smooth :) I'm surprised this did not annoy you ;)
I was thinking the same thing during the entire video, I would most likely have edited that away since I felt it was distracting and somewhat unclear what it was when first viewing the image.
Another fine video as usual Thomas, a quick tip is to press the DOF preview button before taking the picture as this will simulate any lens flare when stopped down at taking aperture.
I just ran into a lens flare issue today, but I didn’t realize it until I got home. However, It does give me hope that these things don’t just happen to me. The difference is that you had a plan ahead of time.
Great tutorial on post photo editing Tom. It helps me out as I often struggle with editing my photos as I tend to be too hard on myself and keep changing / tinkering to get the picture I want. It’s true what you say fresh eyes do help improve and if your not 100% happy then keep modifying till you get it. Cheers
Thanks Tom! You just helped me figure out what to do with a vertical panorama that Lightroom has been screwing up every time I try to use its pano merge tool. Gotta go to Photoshop and stitch it by hand. Do you ever use an auto-merge for bracketed exposures in LR or Camera Raw? Or do you always do your edits first and then open as layers in PS to handle it manually?
I enjoy alls your videos and your very good and impressive images. I like the kind you take your images on location. You take the image at place and not in the editing at at home. Editing it's only the last gentle kick in your work. Great...
I tried to block the sun like this after your other video when you used a case to block it. I ended up with flare like you did here and put the edit on hold. Glad you posted this!
I am always impressed by how little post work you do. The genre is far too full of over processed, unrealistic images - I love how yours buck the trend.
Merging four images into one and changing the shape of a hill is not much post work now? Interesting times. I'd say this is heavily post-processed. He's done it well though, which is the difference.
@@ChrisRoutledge Relatively speaking no, it is not much. When a majority of landscape photographers talk about spending hours in post, and we see the daily flood of grossly over edited work that is currently popular on the internet.
@@dreamcatcher3622 Funny how what's considered minimal changes though, isn't it? Ten, or even five years ago this level of post processing would have been considered very significant. Fifteen or so years ago digital photography itself was cheating.
@@ChrisRoutledge Five years ago this level of processing would not have been considered a lot. Not even ten years ago - the dawn of the HDR craze. This really is minimal even compared to the level of retouching Ansel Adams carried out on his prints.
I thought your version 1 in the previous video was too HDR-like, wow what recovered shadows, etc. Version 2 is much more like it, I like that. And more to come from the Cascades? Bring it on!
Been watching your videos for over a year now, and yourself with a few other UA-camrs has inspired me to get back into landscape photography again after many years away from it. But a question or two, why do you still use grad filters? I understand and used them many years ago with film as we didn't have all these fantastic computer programs we have now. But with modern techniques, like you've just shown why stick a potentially dusty/scratched piece of glass/perspex in front of an expensive lens when you can blend exposures? I get the reasoning behind the ND and polarizing filters, and the odd occasion were there's only time for one shot, but unless I am missing something exposure blending should give similar or better results most of the time.
@thomas heaton if you use blend modes, you can blend in the sky a lot easier. Multiply and lighten blend modes are very useful for big changes in light.
I find it hard when I shoot in different exposures to make a composite, to match the exact editing. So they blend together nicely regarding colour and exposure. Sometimes I make the mistake of using auto white balance which makes me end up with 3 photos that slightly defer in colour and don't go well together 😂
Hi Thomas, that’s the video I wanted to see :) Could you please explain what you mean by saying: Exposing for the sky/shadows do you alter the shutter speed for the individual pictures? Beat regards and great video, Thomas
Nice to see how you create a final image from a composite. It's really made me think more about taking multiple shots on location to get that perfect shot. 👍
Thanks for showing us behind the curtain its helpful to a total PS noob, it’s funny how artists (yes thats what we do) get hung up on the slightest of details, my wife says things like you cant see that little imperfection, problem is we can’t unsee it. P.S that pen looks great i may invest.
I do love watching your blogs Tom,but prefer watching on a smart tv, a small screen dosn't do you justice. Downside being I can't leave comments or order the calender! So, much as I love the image and film, that lake bang in the middle drives me mad wheras the lens flare was beautiful!! all taste I guess. Good work,Tom I really enjoy all your content.
Been a while since I’ve been to your channel, not for any particular reason except a combination of being busy and going down a flat earther video sinkhole (NOT as a supporter, just as a curious observer of the weirdest horror show I’ve encountered in a while), but super happy to return. Love the new digs and for all the other reasons I always liked your videos. Great channel
That lake looks a bit ominous reflections and all are very nice but. Would anyone notice if you drafted in a couple of wee little boats to make it less of a nuisance.
Hmm, interesting to read the comments about lens flare. I sat a whole evening trying to remove lens flare from a sun rise shooting. Maybe I shouldn't care, because my first thought was, I did a poor job but I felt like the photo looked good as it was.
Looking forward to seeing more content from your trip to the Pacific Northwest. It sounds like you had a good trip (action cameras not withstanding). I'm actually going to be in the U.K. next week for a business trip and trying to find a way to fit in a couple of days of photography. It would be a real shame if I'm not able to.
Oh that tshirt again, I finally found out last week why I still haven’t received mine, apparently DHL lost the package and they’re printing a new one for me, guess limited edition is not that limited anymore ;-)
I was never happy with my editing when I shot digital because it meant sitting for hours in front of a computer playing around until it looked "good" and then later a few days later, I didn't like it anymore. This is one of the many reasons why I switched to film!
Hi James, may I ask what film stock would you use for this scene with a very high dynamic range? I've recently started playing with film as well, but so far the results are pretty horrible, but I'm sure it's because I'm doing something completely wrong:D
@@volodymyrcuza9994 the professional colour negatives from Kodak and Fuji would be best if using colour for high dynamic range scenes. The Kodak Portra 400 having the best capability to deal with high contrast having 17 stops of dynamic range and able to overexposed by 6+ stops (though don't know why anyone would do that). But the downside of Portra 400 is that it won't be as fine grained as the 160 one or other slower films (but grain doesn't necessarily mean a bad thing, it's a subjective taste) and it's also Kodak's flagship colour neg and most popular so naturally it became one of the most expensive colour negative films. Also don't underexpose film unless you want a muddy, grainy look in colour negative and BnW or everything pure black in colour slide!!!
Great work Thomas! I have been watching your youtube channel for some time and would be glad to preorder your calendar. On second thought it would be out of use after time passes the calendar range. Will you be printing any books specifically with some of the best photos you take? I would like to order that book :D.
Lovely sunrise but I’m not really sure what I’m supposed to be looking at in this image. The lake? The sun? It just feels like there was a lot of work involved to create what seems like just a nice overall sunrise image with no real strong subject.
Those bright white reflections are a huge distraction in this image. In a view like this where foreground is a bit too dull, I would just not bother trying to add that and go for a longer shot. It's not necessary to always try to add foreground detail.
Really interesting watching videos like this. Whereas I appreciate how frustrating it is, it's great to see that even the Pro's have the same troubles as us mere mortals! Very interesting... Love the final image.
Is it just me or does that lake look like Arabic writing from a distance? I don't like lens flare and I like what you did to remove it. A good example of the 7 P's in action. Thank you
Always love your post edit workflow vlogs Thomas 👍 was pmsl at your face when you weren’t happy with your edit I’m like that every time I edit and take a photo 😂 thanks again for sharing your work stunning image👌🙏calendar ordered can’t wait to see it !!
I just can't get past the bright spot in the center of the image. I know its water but for me. It draws all my attention.
Agree, me too.
Agreed. But what would you guys think of just cloning it out. Everything else Tom did was to bring out what he actually saw. But if he were to clone out the lake, that is too much in my opinion. It just goes too far.
Two ways to go here, depending on school of thought: Make it into 'fine art', clone it out that is. Or leave it as is and just decide its not the best composition... I think it is hard to see that it is an actual lake, first impression is that it is "noise".
@@anniebooo I think if you really want to keep the image its preference. I can keep the image with the lake. It's too much for me. I would have to remove it or scrap the shot. Again this is just my vision. Good thing about photography is you can like whatever you want. Personal taste is personal. It's his shot he can like it as it is.
This is a really interesting conversation thread. It goes to the heart of why we all do landscape photography in the first place. Personally I am an agnostic on whether people "should" alter their images for aesthetic reasons, as long as they are honest about it. Thomas is especially open about what he does to images and why, which is one of the reasons I am a loyal fan.
In my opinion, the problem with the lake is that it is acting like a mirror in what is otherwise a well-composed image. About the only "natural" solution would be either to find a different vantage point or to come at a different time of year. I have often tried to tone down the surface of water, with varying success. Here I would make a high-precision mask for the reflective surface, starting with a luminosity mask and doing some careful hand feathering for the light coming through the trees. I might take shortcuts, but the easiest way to use such a mask is to add a layer group and attach the mask to the group. Within that group I would first add a layer to change the color of the surface from near-white to whatever I thought would be most natural. I would also add some ripples to break the surface up and provide texture. I would do this by hand, under high magnification, with a soft brush or pencil. Think carefully about what this surface would look like. It would darken near the shores. The smooth parts of the surface would mirror the gold of the sunlight and the ripples would have a hint of blue. A little goes a long way here. A skilled artist (not me) could do this with one or two strokes of an almost-dry brush. The layer group with one precision mask allows you to play as much as you want without worrying about boundaries.
On a separate topic, there's also a lot of lens flare here all over the image, not just near the rising sun. That's just the way lenses work. I like the way Thomas has handled it. However, in a situation like this I would always use the best prime lens I could bring, even if I had to modify the overall composition to handle the focal length.
I haven't seen any other photographer in UA-cam being brutally honest with his work. Great job, makes me love your genuine content more and more. Keep it up!
Don't kill me, but for some reason (I guess simply personal taste) in some cases I do like the lens flare, and it is the case with this photo. Not always, but sometimes you can even play with it as a part of the composition. Just IMHO.
No need to be defensive about it. To me, it's a creative process /art. Upto you on what looks good.
@@shafayat1004 Well said
The beauty of it is it’s all subjective. He isn’t wrong and you aren’t too 🙌🏽
I feel the same ay as you
How dare you disagree with Tom. I think I'm gonna cry.
Proof that not all images can be made "in camera" photoshop is an extremely helpful tool and shouldn't be slated like it is by some who don't necessarily understand what can be done when using it. Great demo and image Thomas.
Thomas, you are the Bob Ross of photography. Happy Little Hillsides.... lol.
Tom, "I'm back and Clean Shaven", I'm afraid your mirror is broken.
Beautiful final product Tom. A much needed diversion on my Sunday here across the pond. I can’t wait to try my first exposure stack... for that matter the focus stack too.
Lovely, as you say it, image, but I notice my eyes go to the reflected lake in the middle of the image. I was kind of surprised you didn't bring that up in the video, but you were so all over the lens flare. Also, my pre-order is in for the Calendar!
Wade Shanley good eye! Maybe that’s where he wanted our eyes to go?
I like the photo, but that very bright lake in upper half is drawing my attention too much, plus it is quite rugged while the rest of the sceene is smooth :) I'm surprised this did not annoy you ;)
I was thinking the same thing during the entire video, I would most likely have edited that away since I felt it was distracting and somewhat unclear what it was when first viewing the image.
Carl Bergsdorf I guess on a large print it would be more apparent what it is.
@@gbee8888 Yes, I agree. That lake just took all my attention from the rest of the image. Kept waiting for it to be cloned out.
Next video from Thomas "People Unhappy With My Photo Edit" - clones out the lake :D
Another fine video as usual Thomas, a quick tip is to press the DOF preview button before taking the picture as this will simulate any lens flare when stopped down at taking aperture.
To create a black layer mask, you can just hold down the option key when clicking on the icon.
I just ran into a lens flare issue today, but I didn’t realize it until I got home. However, It does give me hope that these things don’t just happen to me. The difference is that you had a plan ahead of time.
Learning loads watching your new editing style with the tablet. It's definitely helping me. Thanks for sharing :)
It was informative to see your dilemma and how you resolved it. Thanks
Great tutorial on post photo editing Tom. It helps me out as I often struggle with editing my photos as I tend to be too hard on myself and keep changing / tinkering to get the picture I want. It’s true what you say fresh eyes do help improve and if your not 100% happy then keep modifying till you get it. Cheers
Thanks Tom! You just helped me figure out what to do with a vertical panorama that Lightroom has been screwing up every time I try to use its pano merge tool. Gotta go to Photoshop and stitch it by hand. Do you ever use an auto-merge for bracketed exposures in LR or Camera Raw? Or do you always do your edits first and then open as layers in PS to handle it manually?
Very impressed by your post processing workflow. Very helpful for beginners. Like your honesty.
Rasesh Patel less is definitely more! 🙌🏽
STFU stop being a kiss ass!
This teaches me "don't rush your editing, take your time and you will get the result you are looking for." Cheers Thomas.
I enjoy alls your videos and your very good and impressive images. I like the kind you take your images on location. You take the image at place and not in the editing at at home. Editing it's only the last gentle kick in your work. Great...
I'm really enjoying the photo editing videos. Keep them coming.
Nice work Thomas, image turned out quite nice after the post work. Thanks for sharing the video 👍🙏
Adrian Alford Photography rarely lets me down with his images!
I tried to block the sun like this after your other video when you used a case to block it. I ended up with flare like you did here and put the edit on hold. Glad you posted this!
Fantastic work !! Thank you Thomas
They are both really great photos. Great job.
I am always impressed by how little post work you do. The genre is far too full of over processed, unrealistic images - I love how yours buck the trend.
dream catcher he gets the fundamentals down really well in camera 🙌🏽
Merging four images into one and changing the shape of a hill is not much post work now? Interesting times. I'd say this is heavily post-processed. He's done it well though, which is the difference.
@@ChrisRoutledge Relatively speaking no, it is not much. When a majority of landscape photographers talk about spending hours in post, and we see the daily flood of grossly over edited work that is currently popular on the internet.
@@dreamcatcher3622 Funny how what's considered minimal changes though, isn't it? Ten, or even five years ago this level of post processing would have been considered very significant. Fifteen or so years ago digital photography itself was cheating.
@@ChrisRoutledge Five years ago this level of processing would not have been considered a lot. Not even ten years ago - the dawn of the HDR craze.
This really is minimal even compared to the level of retouching Ansel Adams carried out on his prints.
Great video as usual, always enjoy watching them. I've ordered my calendar from down in New Zealand. :)
Wow, very impressed, as always.
I thought your version 1 in the previous video was too HDR-like, wow what recovered shadows, etc. Version 2 is much more like it, I like that. And more to come from the Cascades? Bring it on!
Cool, would never have thought to literally hide the sun. ill try it out. Great final edit.
Thanks for sharing your great technique in blending a difficult image composition. Cheers!
Great video; liked the pace. Good looking calendar.
For a black layer mask, add mask then CMD-I to invert, saves a few seconds but they all add up.
Magnificent!
I had a feeling when I saw your last video that you were in my backyard. Glad you enjoyed it!
Been watching your videos for over a year now, and yourself with a few other UA-camrs has inspired me to get back into landscape photography again after many years away from it. But a question or two, why do you still use grad filters? I understand and used them many years ago with film as we didn't have all these fantastic computer programs we have now. But with modern techniques, like you've just shown why stick a potentially dusty/scratched piece of glass/perspex in front of an expensive lens when you can blend exposures? I get the reasoning behind the ND and polarizing filters, and the odd occasion were there's only time for one shot, but unless I am missing something exposure blending should give similar or better results most of the time.
Me too !! I’m sat staring at my Mac while the spinny circle of doom taunts me !
I learnt a lot! Thank you Thomas.
@thomas heaton if you use blend modes, you can blend in the sky a lot easier. Multiply and lighten blend modes are very useful for big changes in light.
Great final final final Mr H!
I find it hard when I shoot in different exposures to make a composite, to match the exact editing. So they blend together nicely regarding colour and exposure. Sometimes I make the mistake of using auto white balance which makes me end up with 3 photos that slightly defer in colour and don't go well together 😂
Starting to sound more and more like Bob Ross when painting gently 😉 Great vid as always!
Very good work here, Thomas. Thanks.
I really never thought about covering my lense with my hand, to avoid lense flair!! Thanks :)
Hi Thomas, that’s the video I wanted to see :) Could you please explain what you mean by saying: Exposing for the sky/shadows do you alter the shutter speed for the individual pictures?
Beat regards and great video,
Thomas
Awesome! Thanks so much for making this video because this is very helpful to an amateur like me.
Nice work! Great image as always!
great video! very beautiful mountains and sunshine!
Thomas , What’s the second monitor your using please ?
whats the white spot in the centre of the image mate..... can get my head around it. did i miss the hero 7 discussion mate?
Always a pleasure to watch mate, thanks for the videos
I ordered the calendar three weeks ago.
Nice to see how you create a final image from a composite. It's really made me think more about taking multiple shots on location to get that perfect shot. 👍
Thanks for showing us behind the curtain its helpful to a total PS noob, it’s funny how artists (yes thats what we do) get hung up on the slightest of details, my wife says things like you cant see that little imperfection, problem is we can’t unsee it.
P.S that pen looks great i may invest.
Thomas is turning into Bob Ross again, good times.
Ivan Ulyanov happy mountains. The other maintain range needs a friend.
Still looks quite natural, which is great. Good thinking doing the dodging and burning.
A great edit Thomas 👍🏽
I do love watching your blogs Tom,but prefer watching on a smart tv, a small screen dosn't do you justice. Downside being I can't leave comments or order the calender! So, much as I love the image and film, that lake bang in the middle drives me mad wheras the lens flare was beautiful!! all taste I guess. Good work,Tom I really enjoy all your content.
Good thing with editing digital is you can do an edit, delete it and do it again over and over till you like it.
Been a while since I’ve been to your channel, not for any particular reason except a combination of being busy and going down a flat earther video sinkhole (NOT as a supporter, just as a curious observer of the weirdest horror show I’ve encountered in a while), but super happy to return. Love the new digs and for all the other reasons I always liked your videos. Great channel
Thomas, I absolutely love the lens flare!
Great video, Tom, I thoroughly enjoyed it. And that is a beautiful image.
Easy edit but not too easy to think 😁😁👍
Thank you for showing your post processing, what Pen are you using for the edit in PS ?
Great video. Helpful
Thomas, one question, do you exercise? Or atleast condition yourself before a long hike??
Great work.
I enjoyed this video and pre-ordered my calendar.
Both images are fantastic!
Very informative! Thank you! Great video!
That lake looks a bit ominous reflections and all are very nice but. Would anyone notice if you drafted in a couple of wee little boats to make it less of a nuisance.
just ordered my calendar! will be hanging in my office in Alaska...if you ever need an aurora guide.... just sayin'
Thomas, already ordered your calendar :)
Thanks for the walk through and then a rework voice over.
Very helpful, thank you!
HI, Big Fan.. Love to see your Desktop setup, ur editing gagets etc etc.. Keep up the Great work..
Hmm, interesting to read the comments about lens flare. I sat a whole evening trying to remove lens flare from a sun rise shooting. Maybe I shouldn't care, because my first thought was, I did a poor job but I felt like the photo looked good as it was.
Why are you so against the flare?!?! In some cases, this included, it is quite nice...
Looking forward to seeing more content from your trip to the Pacific Northwest. It sounds like you had a good trip (action cameras not withstanding).
I'm actually going to be in the U.K. next week for a business trip and trying to find a way to fit in a couple of days of photography. It would be a real shame if I'm not able to.
Great tips, thanks a lot.
This is a very helpful video
Oh that tshirt again, I finally found out last week why I still haven’t received mine, apparently DHL lost the package and they’re printing a new one for me, guess limited edition is not that limited anymore ;-)
I was never happy with my editing when I shot digital because it meant sitting for hours in front of a computer playing around until it looked "good" and then later a few days later, I didn't like it anymore.
This is one of the many reasons why I switched to film!
Hi James, may I ask what film stock would you use for this scene with a very high dynamic range? I've recently started playing with film as well, but so far the results are pretty horrible, but I'm sure it's because I'm doing something completely wrong:D
@@volodymyrcuza9994 the professional colour negatives from Kodak and Fuji would be best if using colour for high dynamic range scenes. The Kodak Portra 400 having the best capability to deal with high contrast having 17 stops of dynamic range and able to overexposed by 6+ stops (though don't know why anyone would do that).
But the downside of Portra 400 is that it won't be as fine grained as the 160 one or other slower films (but grain doesn't necessarily mean a bad thing, it's a subjective taste) and it's also Kodak's flagship colour neg and most popular so naturally it became one of the most expensive colour negative films.
Also don't underexpose film unless you want a muddy, grainy look in colour negative and BnW or everything pure black in colour slide!!!
@@jameslane3846 Thanks a lot for the prompt reply!
Where did you get the shirt from.
Putting your hand over the sun to get rid of the lens flair was a trick I didn’t know about.
Thanks.
Great tips there, you made it look quite easy, cheers 😊
Great work Thomas! I have been watching your youtube channel for some time and would be glad to preorder your calendar. On second thought it would be out of use after time passes the calendar range. Will you be printing any books specifically with some of the best photos you take? I would like to order that book :D.
What is that white patch near the center?
A lake.
Lovely sunrise but I’m not really sure what I’m supposed to be looking at in this image. The lake? The sun? It just feels like there was a lot of work involved to create what seems like just a nice overall sunrise image with no real strong subject.
I love your pictures .....can you please share some tips for smartphone photographers.
Do you think it's likely he'll do that?
I appreciate seeing the various edits. Thanks.
Whats wrong with lens flares...??
I’m new to Lr/PS so your timing was very helpful.
Those bright white reflections are a huge distraction in this image. In a view like this where foreground is a bit too dull, I would just not bother trying to add that and go for a longer shot. It's not necessary to always try to add foreground detail.
Really interesting watching videos like this. Whereas I appreciate how frustrating it is, it's great to see that even the Pro's have the same troubles as us mere mortals! Very interesting... Love the final image.
How would this photo of looked if you had used a prime lens? Maybe one with strait aperture blades ?
Is it just me or does that lake look like Arabic writing from a distance? I don't like lens flare and I like what you did to remove it. A good example of the 7 P's in action. Thank you
Hi Tom. Another great video, hope you didn't forget to mention your "Sponsor".
Calender bought!
Always love your post edit workflow vlogs Thomas 👍 was pmsl at your face when you weren’t happy with your edit I’m like that every time I edit and take a photo 😂 thanks again for sharing your work stunning image👌🙏calendar ordered can’t wait to see it !!
The fact that I'm working on some images right now, and feel the exact same way, is the perfect video you could've posted today. Thank you Tom!