Coulomb's Law Problems

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @weapons_check
    @weapons_check 11 місяців тому +33

    This literally helped me more than my actual physics teacher Tysm!

    • @vinay22
      @vinay22 5 місяців тому

      tbh i agree wid u

  • @taylormadechamp
    @taylormadechamp 5 місяців тому +3

    Watching you work these problems out and explaining them makes it seem fairly simple. My instructor and the text made it so confusing for me. Thanks!

  • @steves1015
    @steves1015 Рік тому +22

    Nice video and you explained well.
    Just a minor point, it is a bit confusing when you say that when calculating F1 or F2 you don't need to worry if it is positive or negative because that just tells you the direction. Then later you say that the positive or negative for Fnet tells you the direction.
    I think it would be clearer to say that the negative or positive for the F1 or F2 indicates an attraction or repulsion.
    The positive or negative when calculating Fnet would indicate direction, left or right.

  • @amanuelendalkachew2499
    @amanuelendalkachew2499 10 місяців тому +3

    thank you for your clear explanation .from Ethiopia

  • @cara.bella15
    @cara.bella15 2 роки тому +8

    Literally godsent video, thank you!!

  • @qudhachure9598
    @qudhachure9598 3 роки тому +10

    by this video, you earned my subscription your awesome mate.

  • @thameral7rbi
    @thameral7rbi Рік тому +3

    thank you very much, I've watched several videos, yours was the best.

  • @YtRr-l1w
    @YtRr-l1w 17 днів тому

    This is very helpful! Thank you so much. ♥♥♥♥

  • @christopheravila7989
    @christopheravila7989 3 роки тому +10

    How do you locate q3 given 3charges and d between q1/q2
    So far no one in any video has answered this, tired of net forces or magnitude

    • @carultch
      @carultch 2 роки тому +2

      It would help to see a time link for what example in the video you are asking about. q3 could be anywhere relative to q1 and q2, depending on how we specify it.
      You might ask, where can we place q3, so that the net force on it due to q1 and q2 is zero? Given q1 on the left and q2 on the right. In which case, you'd set up a generalized equation for the force on q3, along the axis of q1 and q2. You'd then identify three regions (left of q1, between q1 and q2, and right of q2), and develop an equation for the force on q3 in each of these regions.
      By inspection, you can rule out regions where the force on q3 could not equal zero. For instance, if q1 and q2 are opposite signs, then we know the force on q3 can't be zero between them, so we can rule out that region. If q1 > q2, then we know the force on q3 can't be zero to the left of q1. This leaves only one region (right of q2), where there could be a zero force point, to place q3.

  • @marekamoorosi7565
    @marekamoorosi7565 2 роки тому +15

    You the best sir💞💞
    Was lost but now am focused 💪

  • @raniahabbas85
    @raniahabbas85 Місяць тому +1

    How do you know whether to measure from the horizontal or vertical when we want to find the x and y component. Like how do we know where to put the theta? 😔😔😔 help!

  • @ravenousstrike012
    @ravenousstrike012 11 місяців тому +1

    Thank you and this will be very helpful for my future tests and topics in Physics 2: Electromagnetic Waves❤!
    But i have a question, what is the exact value of 1Coulomb? It is 6.241x10^18 or either +/- 1.6x10^-19? I'm really confused that i cannot make progress about this problem.
    And also, if for example there's 2C, should i also multiply it by 2 on either of those 2 on my first question? The answer i get if there's only number of charges instead the value of C is on scientific notation and higher numbers that isn't I expected.
    Anyway thanks again for these!

    • @zewditukergo7951
      @zewditukergo7951 9 місяців тому

      Bruh, colomb is scalar. so we never use negative sign for that.

  • @quakinaspens
    @quakinaspens Рік тому +4

    in the second problem after finding the angle 71, do we have to find the reference angle since it is in the second quadrant ?

    • @manraaj7409
      @manraaj7409 11 місяців тому

      i think its better to give a reference, to confirm the direction

  • @erikjusufm
    @erikjusufm 4 місяці тому

    Absolutely beautiful explanation like everytime, thank you!

  • @iiStayFlyx5
    @iiStayFlyx5 3 роки тому +3

    hello, im having trouble figuring out when to use sin and cos when solving for f1x in coulombs law, the trig is messing me up. why did you use cos

    • @sameerasif5302
      @sameerasif5302 3 роки тому +1

      Hi,
      I think cos is used on the line where theta is, and sin is used on the line perpendicular to that.

    • @thefirsthandleonyoutube
      @thefirsthandleonyoutube 3 роки тому +3

      Basically (cos) is used when your closing the angle. Like if the angle is on the y-axis, then you use (cos) with respect to the y-axis and (sin) with respect to the x-axis. And vise versa. Hope you understand and it helps.

    • @raniahabbas85
      @raniahabbas85 Місяць тому

      @@thefirsthandleonyoutubehi, I have problem with where to measure my theta. If the question didn’t tell me the angle is horizontal or vertical. How do I know where to measure the theta from?

  • @BeyeneTasew3111
    @BeyeneTasew3111 5 місяців тому

    Yes, Excellent answer ! I appreciate you! Thanks!

  • @redjinn999devil2
    @redjinn999devil2 Рік тому +2

    thank you your 100th comment on this vid love from Pakistan
    💓

  • @rachelhiltystudenthbhs2575
    @rachelhiltystudenthbhs2575 Рік тому +2

    great explanation! thanks for saving my grade

  • @johnkevindavereposposa4223
    @johnkevindavereposposa4223 28 днів тому

    question.
    the Fnet 1y,. why did you use the 0.2m (0.2m is the d)? i think it should be 1.35N - 0.44N.
    since we are looking for the net force..

  • @splashmoney2337
    @splashmoney2337 Рік тому +1

    thank you, u saved my life for the diagnostic test tomorrow.

  • @Sattamsager
    @Sattamsager Рік тому +1

    Thank you so much this helped me so much

  • @jakeisrich
    @jakeisrich 2 роки тому

    Why is did you disregard the sign in 11:12? isn't q3 supposed to be -2x10^6

    • @sama1494
      @sama1494 5 місяців тому

      I think it's because the formula only needs the magnitude of the number not it's direction or something like that

  • @Ishmamy
    @Ishmamy 5 місяців тому

    Great vid.
    But why do you not convert the micro coulombs to coulombs, doesn't it affect the answer?

    • @PhysicsNinja
      @PhysicsNinja  5 місяців тому +1

      just a habit. i always convert to SI

  • @hawadrammeh8870
    @hawadrammeh8870 3 роки тому +8

    Awesome video, thank you so much!

  • @daryldadizon5485
    @daryldadizon5485 Рік тому +1

    question why u write -0.2 in calculation of F1y but the given is 0.20?

    • @PhysicsNinja
      @PhysicsNinja  Рік тому

      Because that component of the force is pointing down and i've called that the negative direction.

  • @jaganmayeesahoo4210
    @jaganmayeesahoo4210 4 роки тому +5

    Thank you ADMIN.# love from India

  • @rubyanneinto49
    @rubyanneinto49 11 місяців тому

    On the first problem, was it supposed to be 0.135 instead of 1.35 N?

  • @Hecticweek
    @Hecticweek 3 роки тому +3

    Thank you so much sir 👍👍👍

  • @imsengky
    @imsengky 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you so much, sir.

  • @laurentiuslancaster1657
    @laurentiuslancaster1657 6 місяців тому

    Is it explained why he uses Tan at 13:50 specifically?

    • @sama1494
      @sama1494 5 місяців тому

      Because when we have an angle Tan = opp/adj

    • @davidg305
      @davidg305 Місяць тому

      No but u can u use any trig function and get the same theta

  • @amarakhan2192
    @amarakhan2192 Рік тому

    Why the direction of F2 is towards positive charge? It should be outwards.

  • @punsarawithanage3840
    @punsarawithanage3840 3 роки тому +2

    Superb one ❤️ from Sri Lanka 🇱🇰

  • @richardferre1253
    @richardferre1253 3 роки тому +1

    but why do we do the vector and angle thing

    • @PhysicsNinja
      @PhysicsNinja  3 роки тому

      unfortunately you have no choice the forces are vectors which have a length and a direction and you might need to add several vectors together. This will require some vector algebra.

    • @richardferre1253
      @richardferre1253 3 роки тому

      @@PhysicsNinja yep that hurts me Ahah but why do we do it in this case, like what is a vector and when do we use it

  • @jpmcfrosty
    @jpmcfrosty Рік тому

    Followed this ex down to a tee and its saying my Net Force value is wrong, not sure what else to do. Only difference in my problem is that my q2 is positive and my q3 is negative and it wants my answer in mN's not N. Have walked through 3 different tutors now and none of them we're able to come to the same conclusion. not sure what else to do...

  • @anastasia2291
    @anastasia2291 2 роки тому +2

    Very good explanation, thank you, you make me understand

  • @Aboodinho.
    @Aboodinho. 2 роки тому +1

    I am the one who should thank you actually ♥

  • @Decoy22x
    @Decoy22x 4 роки тому +126

    i wish my hw this easy

    • @mathias1116
      @mathias1116 2 роки тому +3

      Me to😢

    • @salynt1126
      @salynt1126 2 роки тому +3

      me three😥

    • @ShitThatsMyn
      @ShitThatsMyn 2 роки тому +6

      It's like watchmaking. Cheap, mainstream ones are easy to replicate. While expensive ones require craftsmanship and many complications. By having many complications in your homework your professor is building an expensive, luxurious brains. XD

    • @overl0ad816
      @overl0ad816 2 роки тому +10

      @@ShitThatsMyn in which 50% will forget in a year and 95% in 5😂

    • @alieusenghore4758
      @alieusenghore4758 2 роки тому

      sameee

  • @pitfall0121
    @pitfall0121 4 роки тому +3

    Thank you for this video!

  • @sholaibukun1352
    @sholaibukun1352 3 роки тому +2

    Sir,
    From my calculation the force on q1q3 is0.66N pls do a check
    Thanks

  • @GidleyKome
    @GidleyKome 5 місяців тому

    What if the net force is negative, are we going to write negative charge or not

    • @GidleyKome
      @GidleyKome 5 місяців тому

      Sorry not charge but the negative sign

    • @GidleyKome
      @GidleyKome 5 місяців тому

      Please I need immediate reply

  • @syedhunainali7663
    @syedhunainali7663 4 роки тому

    why you take nagitive sign on net force of x component

  • @CalvinEthan
    @CalvinEthan 5 місяців тому

    Thank you sir, but I’m confused from breaking down of F1 into two components till the end pls help😢🙏🏾

  • @louistaboada964
    @louistaboada964 10 місяців тому

    pls help im stuck at the part where 0.2 over 0.4 is equal to 1/2, explaination?

    • @daph_di.
      @daph_di. 10 місяців тому

      0.2 / 2 = 0.1 ; 0.4/2 = 0.2 so 0.1/0.2 is the same as 1/2 it’s the same ratio

  • @allyssacorral846
    @allyssacorral846 Рік тому

    Why is it -6?

  • @en.muhammad6882
    @en.muhammad6882 4 роки тому

    The last parts of the second problem weren't clear enough
    Why did break the force into components?

    • @ahmedomar9804
      @ahmedomar9804 3 роки тому +1

      You need to break into components because it consists of horizontal rise and vertical as gradient I.e. it is not fully vertical or horizontal - it's between them. This shows you that, it consists of vertical and horizontal line which you will need to find each of them.
      Another thing that can show you it consists of two components, It's like hypotenuse which is found by using the horizontal and vertical lines. Hope you'll get it.

    • @en.muhammad6882
      @en.muhammad6882 3 роки тому +1

      @@ahmedomar9804
      Thank you alot Ahmed for the reply... even though I don't need physics anymore but it was helpful for a further knowledge thanks again.

    • @ahmedomar9804
      @ahmedomar9804 3 роки тому +1

      @@en.muhammad6882 You are welcome. 🖐

  • @al-edrisy1129
    @al-edrisy1129 Рік тому +1

    Sorry , can some one tell me in the first problem why F21 = 135N
    Because I fund it 0.135N

  • @marriamhaji7440
    @marriamhaji7440 11 місяців тому

    Thank you so much ♥️

  • @Ghost-hv2bi
    @Ghost-hv2bi 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks u helped my a lot 😅

  • @mrchocolatebean8878
    @mrchocolatebean8878 11 місяців тому +1

    thanks a lot man

  • @bohlalenchabeleng1370
    @bohlalenchabeleng1370 Рік тому +1

    Thank you.

  • @szxnv
    @szxnv Рік тому +1

    he's the goat

  • @SadiqYahaya-o7i
    @SadiqYahaya-o7i Рік тому +1

    Thank you sir

  • @HienNguyen-jv1px
    @HienNguyen-jv1px 27 днів тому

    thank you so much sir

  • @kamilamohamed284
    @kamilamohamed284 3 роки тому +1

    Can u do it again the second problem please

  • @mahletmekuria144
    @mahletmekuria144 Рік тому

    Awesome vido i really say thank u

  • @JamesPOATE
    @JamesPOATE Рік тому

    Can you add a video on charges forming equilateral and how to find the magnitude and direction of the force of one of the vertex of the triangle.

  • @keolebogileseepamooka0169
    @keolebogileseepamooka0169 4 роки тому

    I don't understand the part where you are explaining the constant (k)

    • @carultch
      @carultch 2 роки тому +1

      It's a universal constant that we experimentally determine. It has a value you can look up, which is about 9*10^9 Newton-meters^2/Coulomb^2.
      Coulomb experimentally determined this constant, in a similar manner as Cavendish determined the Big G of gravity, and hence became the namesake of this law and the unit of charge.
      You may see it written as 1/(4*pi*epsilon0), to relate it to Gauss's law, in which case epsilon0 is the experimentally measured constant that directly depends on the Coulomb constant K. This way, 4*pi*r^2, the surface area of the sphere of influence, appears in the denominator.

  • @joanad1246
    @joanad1246 2 роки тому

    Earned a subscriber thx❤

  • @AmareGebeyaw-kp3ih
    @AmareGebeyaw-kp3ih Рік тому

    Way q3 came to between q1 and q2 not understand you says please

  • @anwynanimations7207
    @anwynanimations7207 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing, thank you!

  • @brandongarcia8244
    @brandongarcia8244 3 роки тому

    For the second question what happened to the 0.44N?

    • @roeal-wazeer3135
      @roeal-wazeer3135 2 роки тому

      he used it to calculate the x and y components of that force, then used those calculated components to find the net force

  • @galagarcrizelm.2226
    @galagarcrizelm.2226 4 роки тому +1

    Thankyouuuuuuuuuuuu so muchhhh

  • @maxbingen8773
    @maxbingen8773 3 роки тому +1

    THANK YOU

  • @jbonceu2457
    @jbonceu2457 4 роки тому +1

    Just wanna clarify, if it's a negative charge, do you require to put negative sign on the process or not?

    • @ahmedomar9804
      @ahmedomar9804 3 роки тому +5

      No, you don't need. The negative sign just shows you that the charge you have is a negative charge. But if it is force, the negative sign shows you the direction of the force.

    • @frazebean5117
      @frazebean5117 2 роки тому +1

      Don't put negative sign on the process as it just defines the direction.

  • @letsileutlwang2456
    @letsileutlwang2456 2 роки тому

    Thanks. But just to clarify, the alpha should be 71.3.

    • @toitozky155
      @toitozky155 2 роки тому

      don't approximate the number

  • @lekanfabiyi3363
    @lekanfabiyi3363 2 роки тому +1

    Merci

  • @ahmedomar9804
    @ahmedomar9804 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you, sir.

  • @Hanan-pe4hh
    @Hanan-pe4hh 4 роки тому +2

    Find the.distance between two spheres one -3.0x10 race to -5 and the other -2.5x10race to -4 ,if the electric force is 1.0N

    • @Hanan-pe4hh
      @Hanan-pe4hh 4 роки тому

      What means electric force?

    • @ahmedomar9804
      @ahmedomar9804 3 роки тому

      r=7.35m

    • @ahmedomar9804
      @ahmedomar9804 3 роки тому

      @@Hanan-pe4hh Electric force is the force acted on a charge by another of like(same) or unlike ( different) charge(s).

  • @arcadiana-jan-causin5421
    @arcadiana-jan-causin5421 Рік тому

    can anyone enlighten me why 1.35N when i got her 1,350?

  • @cyrus2857
    @cyrus2857 Рік тому

    fantastic

  • @kowh262
    @kowh262 3 роки тому +1

    You did a good job cutie

  • @xiaos3198
    @xiaos3198 Рік тому

    wait. how did you know that there are 2 forces acting on y direction?

  • @wamakaghambi4477
    @wamakaghambi4477 Рік тому

    wow this is really a good work

  • @EYEBALLKLOTT
    @EYEBALLKLOTT Рік тому +1

    Thank you for telling

  • @ebukaugwu1684
    @ebukaugwu1684 3 роки тому +1

    great work

  • @EYEBALLKLOTT
    @EYEBALLKLOTT Рік тому

    We're dealing with far more than microcool. He and we at this House are dealing with every fitted label and price setter. That's Android policy you're taking about. So I have shopped for this house and receipts were sent out I expect. It also has a limited right to ERR within it's space as the state lottery stays next door. Our house may clip some hedges and it's height is as high as federalist access goes.
    In our practical lives here, we don't all do this. I do. I'm the fence keeper here and it is a house Paul. So let's just say it has a soft underbelly as an opportunity to prove youre A: capable of outlining a property's edges. You know what that is and you can be found at the door.
    B: You're safe being trusted to stand in
    C: You're a stay put homebody
    D:You'd kick instead of shoot
    E: You'd Enterprises
    F: you'd find treasures in the dirt on ground
    G: has no right this high up.

  • @jeseniafilpo9938
    @jeseniafilpo9938 Рік тому +1

    🥰🥰🥰

  • @Patrick-kickass
    @Patrick-kickass 3 роки тому +1

    Very good!

  • @nononnomonohjghdgdshrsrhsjgd
    @nononnomonohjghdgdshrsrhsjgd 2 роки тому

    du vergisst Mobbing nie und kommst über die Errinnerung nicht, weil die Stiche zu viel gewesen sind.

  • @StrawberryGamer-r7v
    @StrawberryGamer-r7v 21 день тому

    I LOVE YOU

  • @nononnomonohjghdgdshrsrhsjgd
    @nononnomonohjghdgdshrsrhsjgd 2 роки тому

    das ergebnis ist massiver Vertrauensverlust und Erschöpfung.

  • @mrfn9529
    @mrfn9529 3 роки тому

    It's so easy guys.if u were in Iran's high school you would leave the school😂.

    • @Nic-co6ot
      @Nic-co6ot 2 роки тому

      Good thing I don't.

  • @bert4969
    @bert4969 10 місяців тому

    This guy is a total geek. He should stick to chemistry. Sending hate from Delaware.

    • @PhysicsNinja
      @PhysicsNinja  10 місяців тому

      I’m a physicist pinhead

    • @bert4969
      @bert4969 9 місяців тому

      @@PhysicsNinja oh really? Sounds like something a wannabe physicist would say. Stick to chemistry bud…

    • @zewditukergo7951
      @zewditukergo7951 9 місяців тому

      ​@@PhysicsNinja He is great. but no use to learn most physics justto pass the f*ucking exam

    • @wistfulgraph
      @wistfulgraph 8 місяців тому

      @@zewditukergo7951then why click on this video?

  • @OzoemenaZita
    @OzoemenaZita 6 місяців тому

    You lost me when you brought in the components for F1. Why F1 and not F2. The whole thing is confusing and annoying 😭😭

  • @nononnomonohjghdgdshrsrhsjgd
    @nononnomonohjghdgdshrsrhsjgd 2 роки тому

    ich wünsche allen, die mitgelacht und teilgenommen haben, es zu erleben. dann werden sie sich anders verhalten.

  • @marbenangelolause3186
    @marbenangelolause3186 Рік тому

    hello newton set b

  • @nononnomonohjghdgdshrsrhsjgd
    @nononnomonohjghdgdshrsrhsjgd 2 роки тому

    mobbing muss verboten werden.

  • @devcl1ps
    @devcl1ps Рік тому

    you earned my dislike thanks so much for not helping

    • @PhysicsNinja
      @PhysicsNinja  Рік тому +1

      I still like you

    • @devcl1ps
      @devcl1ps Рік тому

      @@PhysicsNinja mbmb i got really pissed bc i couldn't understand lol

  • @SalisuMaryam-d1u
    @SalisuMaryam-d1u Рік тому +5

    You should start from the questions not just from diagrams please

    • @zewditukergo7951
      @zewditukergo7951 9 місяців тому

      There is enough given to solve the problem on the diagram.