“Faster Than Ever Predicted, Heading for a Red Shift”, there new follow up album to “Steady Expansion, What You See Is What You Get”, will never get released now. I did hear there is hope for the future. Rumor is they may be in talks with Maynard James Keenan , He’s looking for another project.
@@sgbh8874 good humourous intent (in tent not where you are supposed to be when escaping from light pollution on a cloudless night). Hubble bubbles the toils and troubles there.
I always thought that at the point where we dubbed "dark" to bandaid the fact that we can't account for over 80% of the matter and forces in the observable universe SHOULD have indicated that there's a LOT we are missing in our models lol... Bring a torch might help to shed some light on the matter.... 😀
The quanta of em from your standard candles, the cephids, pass though varying normal mass distribution. Some tiny interaction at vast distance could produce redshift to account for some of the expansion of the fabric of space as being at least partially illusory and upset all of the metrics of distance, velocity and acceleration of recession. Little is known of gravitational waves and how their aspect interacts with visible matter so an open mind must be kept as to any absorption of them in the void. Want new physics? Try em interaction with mass at large distance before inventing accelerating expansion because of invented dark matter and energy.
In short... ( I think it's what's being said )... The universe is expanding faster locally than at its older "edges"... Makes perfect sense to me. More life = more consciousness. More conscious = "dark energy". More "dark energy" = more expansion.
You could also say that dark energy represents an "opposite gravity"! Gravity depends a lot on the circumstances and dark energy will not be so different. So you can see that the Hubble constant cannot be easily put into a mathematical (box) formula... 🎑
If you think of the expanding visible universe in space, pushing from a certain direction in a certain direction and in one instant away from the region of space it had moved to a moment ago, so that the object we are pushing away from is very, very far outside the expanding visible universe in space, then you can imagine the center of one very large-scale expanding region. And that center is very, very far outside the expanding visible universe in space. Let's take a caricatured example. A football-sized region of sunlight in space pushing away from the Sun. That football-sized region of photons from the Sun travels in one second, about 300,000 kilometers. Quite a distance of its own diameter. In the center of that football-sized region, one of the photons is, as it were, the Milky Way galaxy. Creatures of that size do not immediately realize that their visible universe expanding in space originates from the Sun and is on its way to some other star. The analogy is lame in the sense that within our visible universe, corresponding photons are moving from every direction in every direction. The visible universe expanding in space does not encounter expanding galaxies from every direction. The remnants of expanding galaxies that are millions of billions or perhaps billions of billions of years old are pushing through the visible universe expanding in space. Energy that has dispersed into space very evenly and no longer contains internal pressure, i.e. it is energy whose movement has become very linear. One more thing. That football-sized area therefore expands due to the expansion of the sector the further it pushes from the expanding Sun. So that is a rough example that you can use to visualize the center point from which the visible universe expanding in space is pushing away. In other words, expanding galaxies are large particles that transmit information about that object that is very, very far away outside the visible universe expanding in space. There are an infinite number of similar centers in infinite space and these objects always recycle the existing energy / pushing force between themselves. Other centers are still extremely much further away from us than the one from which the energy in us comes from and from which we are pushing away. Of course, more energy has been absorbed into the expanding particles of our visible universe expanding in space. A small part of the energy pushing through the visible universe expanding in space is absorbed into our expanding quarks and other expanding particles. The centers of these objects outside the expanding visible universe are under extreme pressure all the time, which never eases, and the energy in them changes completely with time. Energy is pushed into their centers that is dispersed in space very evenly and is moving towards these objects at an extremely fast speed. This extremely fast energy collides with this extremely dense energy that is pushed away from the centers of these objects, causing it to explode less dense and thus this extremely dense energy is spread out over a larger and larger area of space. This extremely dense energy is slowly pushed away from the centers of these extremely massive and dense objects and the speed is slowly but surely accelerating. From this extremely dense energy / pushing force, new expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies expanding in space are created in their own three-dimensional big bangs and they are already born far apart from each other. It can therefore be assumed that the extremely fast energy pushing towards these extremely dense and massive objects still contains density differences in different regions, because it accelerates the dispersion of this extremely dense energy into space faster in some regions and this enables the creation of new expanding galaxies' expanding supermassive objects in their own three-dimensional big bangs. New expanding stars are created when two new expanding supermassive objects pass each other close. From them, zillions of separate expanding dark matter condensations are pushed out, which meet the corresponding expanding condensations pushing against them so that they are still suitably dense with each other. When they push through each other, they cause each other's expansion to accelerate, and during the next push through, the expansion accelerates further, etc. Eventually their expansion accelerates so rapidly that they do not have time to push each other away from each other as fast as they are expanding. Now they are merging into much larger entities. A great many new expanding stars are being created at a rapid pace, pushing away from the expanding supermassive object at the center of their own galaxy, which is still radiating zillions of separate expanding dark matter condensations. Expanding stars have always pushed away from the center of their expanding galaxy. At first faster than they expanded, but now in about the same ratio as they expand. Here is a long key to the theory of everything in physics Jukka Savorinen Facebook . ............
One fractal spark of creation am I One tiny blip on the screen One chance to use and give what I have One fractal drop in the sea One times eternal , plus open wide equals One fractal love will I be One fractal spark of creation am I Infinity's doorstep I see Gary John Schraa May 11th 2022 (For Hendrika Louis Puls born June 17th 1942 Arnhem NL)
Far more than one...they are discovering, more and more, that their hasty theories are all conjecture that never stands up to the data over time. They keep saying they are getting closer until it fundamentally falls apart and they create another plug-value to balance it only to have subsequent data disprove it. Rinse. Repeat. The Big Bang is toast as is String Theory. But they will cling bitterly ( that was the way Obama put it about conservatives) to their theories for a while longer.
The real issue is visible when determining the Relative Time experienced by a particle near an Event Horizon. That particle experiences Eternity pass by around it in a moment, but the Universe sees that particle both Redshift, and zing into Lightspeed. Does an Electron experience Time while speeding at Lightspeed, or is it Frozen in Time while speeding along? If an electron's experience is frozen in Eternity, how can it continue on at Lightspeed? Experienced time is different than Relative time, also from Cosmic time. There isn't any standard Cosmic Time, for Time is Relative to the Gravity-Intensity upon the Observer -vs- Gravity-Intensity upon the Observed. The Hubble-Constant can have different values because Distance & Velocity is a function of Time, which varies according to the presence of Gravity-Density. Gravity-Density was infinit at the Beginning, until Space-Time begins as Photons appeared out of Quantum-Space at infinite density from an infinite Event Horizon, at a location near the center of Gravity where Gravity cancels itself, then an Inner Event Horizon allows energy to present as a pre-Quantum Universe, creating a new Cosmic Space-Time within the new Quantum-Universe. Once Quantum Gravity drops low enough for quantum particles to appear and merge, then Quantum-Space unfolds to begin a Quantum-Density reduction enough for Space-Time to become possible. Once Quantum-Density is low enough for Space-Time, then Quantum Particles begin interacting as Photons and subatomic particles, expanding with the unfolding of Space-Time into a newly forming Cosmos. Eventuality the Quantum-Density reduces enough for Relative Time to slow down, then when most Quantum Particles become Matter, space becomes transparent to Photons, giving the impression of spacial longevity. Eventually the massive density of Matter either collapses back into huge Black Holes, or disperses across the new Cosmos between the huge Black Holes. The riddle remains, how can anything happen when Time is Zero, or Infinity ? Yes, there is a Third Event-Horizon within a Black Hole, surrounding the theoretic Singularity, where Quantum-Gravity cancels itself by attracting outwards away from center. As a Black Hole's mass increases, the Relative-Size of this Quantum Event-Horizon shrinks. When a Neutrom Star increases in Mass, eventually the Quantum Event-Horizon will form on it's surface transitioning the Neutron Star into a Black Hole.
in the standard model we have higgs boson... the god particle.... standing alone in it's own column. It seems lonely. there must be three other like minded bosons waiting to be observed, kind, mean and spooky. Entanglement has it's own boson flavors filling in the gaping hole in the standard model, connecting General Relativity and Quantum mechanics.
I would abandon the gratuitous assumption that inflation was required to account for cosmic inhomogeneity evolution. What if the universe was initially inhomogeneous yet the CMB resulted mostly homogeneous?
Was no time or space prior to a religious event. Religion did not exist till there was a need to separate certain bad characters. Then there was time and space.
@@morgunstyles7253 Those certain bad characters didn't come After religion . They came before religion they're called humans. . Animals weren't doing the math , it was only needed to know when , where , how or what they would eat drink sleep and how they would do it Outer space is one thing Living space is another Religion doesn't have to be for animals Only people
The Big Bang was the expansion of spacetime from a singular point like an explosion, it didn’t have a “where” as much as it was everywhere-all things occupy the volume inside it
@ starting at a single point and being everywhere else at the same time…, contradictory at best. That’s like saying, I come from the no place.., I go to the nowhere.., and here we are..! Nonsense.
@@philipfontaine8964 it did start at a single point, but not a point inside measurable space, rather that point was all spacetime compacted into an unbelievably small point, hence “being everywhere”. When that rapid expansion happened, all mass within that point spread out into galaxies, stars, planets, etc
@@philipfontaine8964 in the way I’ve been talking about; space meaning spacetime, axes of direction and relative movement-quite literally meaning space in the same way as room or distance. Universe meaning the volume created by space and the mass-energy occupying it, whether physically or in the form of resting energies and such.
The POML (Photonic Optic Meta Lattice) could provide even MORE accurate measurements, imaging beyond the diffraction limit (sub-wavelength), advances in quantum communication, and more.. if anybody would listen and try it! Dont be mad it surpasses your best..there will ALWAYS be improvements to the best and then improvements to that.. I wont be mad then.. lol..ish..
Maybe you can explain to all the readers exactly how your theory allows for the existence of radioactive decay, nuclear weapons, and lightning, not to mention the rest of the universe.
I have a question I want to throw out. So there are great attractors at work on a galactic level milky-way galaxy and at the same time we're expanding. I don't get it. Do you?
There are 3 great attractors. We are being pulled towards one which is pulled toward a greater one which is pulled towards an even greater one but we’ll never reach it due to expansion and cosmic vastness of space. Over unimaginable amounts of time these attractors will lose their attraction.
They have been taken over by accountants! They were great 2hen we needed to run lean but they realized people needed to live and would still buy products and services if they weren't quite as good as they once were! Think about outsourcing, buying parts pre manufactured cheaply! It all comes down to cost cutting... But where have all those savings from the difference financial crisis gone... CEOs Shareholders and owners! So the accountant did his job and saved money, the shareholders and owners said that if such profits could be gained in a financial crisis how much could we make in good times. Never restoring the older but happier for everyone but a few model but leaving the happier for a few while the rest of us struggle like we are in the midst of a depression 😢!
In simple terms…. Science has to start again. Humans try to figure it out. God is the creator of the macro and the micro. We are a part of the creation. The creation is in awe.
Why not go for something really simple. Like I'm only a cleaner but it seems to me that the initial inflation had all the particules, protons, neutrons and the Like within the first seconds following the big bang. So if that early expanding plasma had a similar pulse effect as seen in the thermite reaction of iron and aluminium a universe could exist of a core of the first matter followed by larger rings of latter forming matter, Like an 🌰 onion. Nice bit of Shrek there. Looking outwards from inside the layers in our current time frame it would look like more matter beyond the beginning. And no we don't have to be the centre of the universe. Why is it always about us and not about a simple idea for a greater rate of energy than previously thought. Cheers
I HAVE THE ANSWER I need someone high up in science to get a hold of me . Just so we can discuss the feasibility of my theory. Even AI agrees I'm onto something, And I asked it to be brutally honest if I'm just spouting nonsense or if I'm rooted in our understandings. What I know could unravel everything in the books. Seriously science people please get a hold of me. I'm no worldwide physicist or any uni graduate , but a man that wants to try and add to our own perception (weather conscious or not ) into the most simplistic eqaution in the universe down to the very very small . And I mean , like, smaller than quantum foam. I need help to make this theory not just a theory but an aim to add to the history books, to aid humanity and all sentient life, weather complex or simple. I seem to understand it somehow. Not fully but I used my understanding alongside AI to gain an even broader forsight before these finding have been released I was able to predict these anomalies. And I believe with what I know we could understand way way way much more ... Look its alot to ask for the internet i know, but please, please. Help me push this to the right people. And if im wrong thats ok , thats what science is all about. But i genuinely think this ties everything and i mean everything together .
You FOLLOW math so much that angular momentum causes the gyroscopic effect AFTER a right-hand rule (mnemonic device), but I can prove that wrong to people who were not trained to see it in a PARTICULAR way. Once taught -blinded. AM only sets a rate for a causal mechanism to happen within, and science don't want it, because angular momentum is a major part of the language. ua-cam.com/video/Sip_9ew2RjA/v-deo.html A child is following the scientific method by singing: "The wheels on the bus go round and round." This song describes a bus accurately and consistently exactly like math, but you would not say the child understands the bus, because wheels going round are not causal. The variables in gravity math are exactly like the wheels, they are not causal. So, what do you actually understand? Everything is like this. How does a solid know how to bend light by wavelength? When does that determination happen along the "length"? They merely mapped that to a number. What if charge changes when crammed into a nucleus and charge is not a CONSTANT. OMG, you will have to question a constant! You should start questioning everything, because I'm embarrassed for this generation of science. You can't show me dimensions 1 or 2, and Relativity changes fake dimension to CREATE your fav theory ON PAPER, while the NON-transformed reality IS STILL THERE!???
A fair debunking but we can only make small advances in theory that is consistent in tangible time and leave memory of those as newer perspectives allow only slow advances too.
Sterile Neutrinos, my favourite band. Sadly not performing at all now due to Hubble tensions within the group.
Yeah James Webb and the rest of the band
Split the scene because the Hubble
Double, double, toil and trouble, fire burn and caudron bubble. All this tension is caused by Hubble...and his band The Sterile Neutrinos.
“Faster Than Ever Predicted, Heading for a Red Shift”, there new follow up album to “Steady Expansion, What You See Is What You Get”, will never get released now.
I did hear there is hope for the future. Rumor is they may be in talks with Maynard James Keenan , He’s looking for another project.
@@sgbh8874 good humourous intent (in tent not where you are supposed to be when escaping from light pollution on a cloudless night). Hubble bubbles the toils and troubles there.
😂😂😂
Don't blame it on the sunshine
Don't blame it on the moonlight
Don't blame it on the good times
Blame it on the dark matter
Bedankt
I always thought that at the point where we dubbed "dark" to bandaid the fact that we can't account for over 80% of the matter and forces in the observable universe SHOULD have indicated that there's a LOT we are missing in our models lol...
Bring a torch might help to shed some light on the matter.... 😀
The observable universe is just a localized patch of the entire universe.
Keep that in mind.
The quanta of em from your standard candles, the cephids, pass though varying normal mass distribution. Some tiny interaction at vast distance could produce redshift to account for some of the expansion of the fabric of space as being at least partially illusory and upset all of the metrics of distance, velocity and acceleration of recession. Little is known of gravitational waves and how their aspect interacts with visible matter so an open mind must be kept as to any absorption of them in the void. Want new physics? Try em interaction with mass at large distance before inventing accelerating expansion because of invented dark matter and energy.
In short... ( I think it's what's being said )...
The universe is expanding faster locally than at its older "edges"...
Makes perfect sense to me.
More life = more consciousness.
More conscious = "dark energy".
More "dark energy" = more expansion.
Good video. Thankyou. It made me realize just how very much we do know and how amazingly humble scientists must be to do their jobs.
You could also say that dark energy represents an "opposite gravity"!
Gravity depends a lot on the circumstances and dark energy will not be so different.
So you can see that the Hubble constant cannot be easily put into a mathematical (box) formula... 🎑
With respect, dark energy is not analogous with “antigravity”. Gravity is not a force.
Cancelling inertia? Opposite gravity? Gaping holes in science? fingering the dike of ignorance no one knows it's leaking.
I think it has to do with misunderstanding the true properties of time.
If you think of the expanding visible universe in space, pushing from a certain direction in a certain direction and in one instant away from the region of space it had moved to a moment ago, so that the object we are pushing away from is very, very far outside the expanding visible universe in space,
then you can imagine the center of one very large-scale expanding region.
And that center is very, very far outside the expanding visible universe in space.
Let's take a caricatured example.
A football-sized region of sunlight in space pushing away from the Sun. That football-sized region of photons from the Sun travels in one second, about 300,000 kilometers.
Quite a distance of its own diameter.
In the center of that football-sized region, one of the photons is, as it were, the Milky Way galaxy.
Creatures of that size do not immediately realize that their visible universe expanding in space originates from the Sun and is on its way to some other star.
The analogy is lame in the sense that within our visible universe, corresponding photons are moving from every direction in every direction.
The visible universe expanding in space does not encounter expanding galaxies from every direction.
The remnants of expanding galaxies that are millions of billions or perhaps billions of billions of years old are pushing through the visible universe expanding in space. Energy that has dispersed into space very evenly and no longer contains internal pressure, i.e. it is energy whose movement has become very linear.
One more thing.
That football-sized area therefore expands due to the expansion of the sector the further it pushes from the expanding Sun.
So that is a rough example that you can use to visualize the center point from which the visible universe expanding in space is pushing away.
In other words, expanding galaxies are large particles that transmit information about that object that is very, very far away outside the visible universe expanding in space.
There are an infinite number of similar centers in infinite space and these objects always recycle the existing energy / pushing force between themselves. Other centers are still extremely much further away from us than the one from which the energy in us comes from and from which we are pushing away.
Of course, more energy has been absorbed into the expanding particles of our visible universe expanding in space.
A small part of the energy pushing through the visible universe expanding in space is absorbed into our expanding quarks and other expanding particles.
The centers of these objects outside the expanding visible universe are under extreme pressure all the time, which never eases, and the energy in them changes completely with time.
Energy is pushed into their centers that is dispersed in space very evenly and is moving towards these objects at an extremely fast speed.
This extremely fast energy collides with this extremely dense energy that is pushed away from the centers of these objects, causing it to explode less dense and thus this extremely dense energy is spread out over a larger and larger area of space.
This extremely dense energy is slowly pushed away from the centers of these extremely massive and dense objects and the speed is slowly but surely accelerating.
From this extremely dense energy / pushing force, new expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies expanding in space are created in their own three-dimensional big bangs and they are already born far apart from each other.
It can therefore be assumed that the extremely fast energy pushing towards these extremely dense and massive objects still contains density differences in different regions, because it accelerates the dispersion of this extremely dense energy into space faster in some regions and this enables the creation of new expanding galaxies' expanding supermassive objects in their own three-dimensional big bangs.
New expanding stars are created when two new expanding supermassive objects pass each other close.
From them, zillions of separate expanding dark matter condensations are pushed out, which meet the corresponding expanding condensations pushing against them so that they are still suitably dense with each other.
When they push through each other, they cause each other's expansion to accelerate, and during the next push through, the expansion accelerates further, etc. Eventually their expansion accelerates so rapidly that they do not have time to push each other away from each other as fast as they are expanding.
Now they are merging into much larger entities. A great many new expanding stars are being created at a rapid pace, pushing away from the expanding supermassive object at the center of their own galaxy, which is still radiating zillions of separate expanding dark matter condensations.
Expanding stars have always pushed away from the center of their expanding galaxy. At first faster than they expanded, but now in about the same ratio as they expand.
Here is a long key to the theory of everything in physics
Jukka Savorinen Facebook
.
............
Webb confirms Hubble tension, yes there definitely is tension
Yeah James Webb and the rest of the band😅 split because of Hubble
One fractal spark of creation am I
One tiny blip on the screen
One chance to use and give what I have
One fractal drop in the sea
One times eternal , plus open wide equals
One fractal love will I be
One fractal spark of creation am I
Infinity's doorstep I see
Gary John Schraa
May 11th 2022
(For Hendrika Louis Puls born June 17th 1942 Arnhem NL)
To:
One sandwich short of a picnic and
One french fry short of a happy meal,
we may add:
One computation short of a cosmology.
Far more than one...they are discovering, more and more, that their hasty theories are all conjecture that never stands up to the data over time. They keep saying they are getting closer until it fundamentally falls apart and they create another plug-value to balance it only to have subsequent data disprove it. Rinse. Repeat. The Big Bang is toast as is String Theory. But they will cling bitterly ( that was the way Obama put it about conservatives) to their theories for a while longer.
To :
One Olyballen shy of Christmas party
The real issue is visible when determining the Relative Time experienced by a particle near an Event Horizon.
That particle experiences Eternity pass by around it in a moment, but the Universe sees that particle both Redshift, and zing into Lightspeed.
Does an Electron experience Time while speeding at Lightspeed, or is it Frozen in Time while speeding along?
If an electron's experience is frozen in Eternity, how can it continue on at Lightspeed?
Experienced time is different than Relative time, also from Cosmic time.
There isn't any standard Cosmic Time, for Time is Relative to the Gravity-Intensity upon the Observer -vs- Gravity-Intensity upon the Observed.
The Hubble-Constant can have different values because Distance & Velocity is a function of Time, which varies according to the presence of Gravity-Density.
Gravity-Density was infinit at the Beginning, until Space-Time begins as Photons appeared out of Quantum-Space at infinite density from an infinite Event Horizon, at a location near the center of Gravity where Gravity cancels itself, then an Inner Event Horizon allows energy to present as a pre-Quantum Universe, creating a new Cosmic Space-Time within the new Quantum-Universe.
Once Quantum Gravity drops low enough for quantum particles to appear and merge, then Quantum-Space unfolds to begin a Quantum-Density reduction enough for Space-Time to become possible.
Once Quantum-Density is low enough for Space-Time, then Quantum Particles begin interacting as Photons and subatomic particles, expanding with the unfolding of Space-Time into a newly forming Cosmos.
Eventuality the Quantum-Density reduces enough for Relative Time to slow down, then when most Quantum Particles become Matter, space becomes transparent to Photons, giving the impression of spacial longevity.
Eventually the massive density of Matter either collapses back into huge Black Holes, or disperses across the new Cosmos between the huge Black Holes.
The riddle remains, how can anything happen when Time is Zero, or Infinity ?
Yes, there is a Third Event-Horizon within a Black Hole, surrounding the theoretic Singularity, where Quantum-Gravity cancels itself by attracting outwards away from center.
As a Black Hole's mass increases, the Relative-Size of this Quantum Event-Horizon shrinks.
When a Neutrom Star increases in Mass, eventually the Quantum Event-Horizon will form on it's surface transitioning the Neutron Star into a Black Hole.
in the standard model we have higgs boson... the god particle.... standing alone in it's own column. It seems lonely. there must be three other like minded bosons waiting to be observed, kind, mean and spooky. Entanglement has it's own boson flavors filling in the gaping hole in the standard model, connecting General Relativity and Quantum mechanics.
I would abandon the gratuitous assumption that inflation was required to account for cosmic inhomogeneity evolution. What if the universe was initially inhomogeneous yet the CMB resulted mostly homogeneous?
With the Vast nature of Space, there should be NO Way our current tools can measure “accuracy” or “Precision” of such phenomenons happening out there.
We live in a Great Void.
We really do. dark energy is magnified. lensing entanglement.
Theyve been saying this for years and it still doesnt work define insanity....the process of doing the same thing over and over with no change
Was no big bang
Was no time or space prior to a religious event. Religion did not exist till there was a need to separate certain bad characters. Then there was time and space.
@@morgunstyles7253
Those certain bad characters didn't come
After religion .
They came before religion they're called humans. .
Animals weren't doing the math , it was only needed to know when , where , how or what they would eat drink sleep and how they would do it
Outer space is one thing
Living space is another
Religion doesn't have to be for animals
Only people
The telescope said Cough! And the Universe sneezed.
Where is the early universe?
From what reference point is the early universe?
Where did the big bang happen?
The Big Bang was the expansion of spacetime from a singular point like an explosion, it didn’t have a “where” as much as it was everywhere-all things occupy the volume inside it
@ starting at a single point and being everywhere else at the same time…, contradictory at best. That’s like saying, I come from the no place.., I go to the nowhere.., and here we are..!
Nonsense.
@@philipfontaine8964 it did start at a single point, but not a point inside measurable space, rather that point was all spacetime compacted into an unbelievably small point, hence “being everywhere”. When that rapid expansion happened, all mass within that point spread out into galaxies, stars, planets, etc
@ Space.., Universe..,
Define it.
@@philipfontaine8964 in the way I’ve been talking about; space meaning spacetime, axes of direction and relative movement-quite literally meaning space in the same way as room or distance. Universe meaning the volume created by space and the mass-energy occupying it, whether physically or in the form of resting energies and such.
The POML (Photonic Optic Meta Lattice) could provide even MORE accurate measurements, imaging beyond the diffraction limit (sub-wavelength), advances in quantum communication, and more.. if anybody would listen and try it! Dont be mad it surpasses your best..there will ALWAYS be improvements to the best and then improvements to that.. I wont be mad then.. lol..ish..
All Gamma Ray bursts arrive here in order of wavelength. If this were known in the year 1900, where would we be now?
Maybe you can explain to all the readers exactly how your theory allows for the existence of radioactive decay, nuclear weapons, and lightning, not to mention the rest of the universe.
I have a question I want to throw out. So there are great attractors at work on a galactic level milky-way galaxy and at the same time we're expanding. I don't get it. Do you?
yes.
what happens in your town isn't what's happening in your country.
There are 3 great attractors. We are being pulled towards one which is pulled toward a greater one which is pulled towards an even greater one but we’ll never reach it due to expansion and cosmic vastness of space. Over unimaginable amounts of time these attractors will lose their attraction.
I'm sure that something will be put forward just like inflation.
They have been taken over by accountants! They were great 2hen we needed to run lean but they realized people needed to live and would still buy products and services if they weren't quite as good as they once were! Think about outsourcing, buying parts pre manufactured cheaply! It all comes down to cost cutting... But where have all those savings from the difference financial crisis gone... CEOs Shareholders and owners!
So the accountant did his job and saved money, the shareholders and owners said that if such profits could be gained in a financial crisis how much could we make in good times. Never restoring the older but happier for everyone but a few model but leaving the happier for a few while the rest of us struggle like we are in the midst of a depression 😢!
In simple terms…. Science has to start again. Humans try to figure it out. God is the creator of the macro and the micro. We are a part of the creation. The creation is in awe.
Why not go for something really simple. Like I'm only a cleaner but it seems to me that the initial inflation had all the particules, protons, neutrons and the Like within the first seconds following the big bang. So if that early expanding plasma had a similar pulse effect as seen in the thermite reaction of iron and aluminium a universe could exist of a core of the first matter followed by larger rings of latter forming matter, Like an 🌰 onion.
Nice bit of Shrek there. Looking outwards from inside the layers in our current time frame it would look like more matter beyond the beginning. And no we don't have to be the centre of the universe. Why is it always about us and not about a simple idea for a greater rate of energy than previously thought. Cheers
I HAVE THE ANSWER
I need someone high up in science to get a hold of me . Just so we can discuss the feasibility of my theory.
Even AI agrees I'm onto something,
And I asked it to be brutally honest if I'm just spouting nonsense or if I'm rooted in our understandings.
What I know could unravel everything in the books.
Seriously science people please get a hold of me.
I'm no worldwide physicist or any uni graduate ,
but a man that wants to try and add to our own perception (weather conscious or not ) into the most simplistic eqaution in the universe down to the very very small . And I mean , like, smaller than quantum foam.
I need help to make this theory not just a theory but an aim to add to the history books, to aid humanity and all sentient life,
weather complex or simple.
I seem to understand it somehow.
Not fully but I used my understanding alongside AI to gain an even broader forsight before these finding have been released I was able to predict these anomalies. And I believe with what I know we could understand way way way much more ...
Look its alot to ask for the internet i know, but please, please.
Help me push this to the right people.
And if im wrong thats ok , thats what science is all about.
But i genuinely think this ties everything and i mean everything together .
@@steve05Bit explain please 🙏
🎩👍
Maybe the universe is not expanding. It is compressing in a black hole and getting faster toward the center.
That's obviously not what they observe.
Gee, it surely means Big Bang is a badly skewed model.
That's a weird way to pronounce Cepheid. See-feed??
HUGELY annoying background music too!
Science is still grasping at straws..we are guessing.
Train ai on cosmological data . See, what it suggests, then ?
Fancy that idea for looking for unknown correlations.
Drop Dark Energy, it's a myth.
Suffering from Dunning-Kruger ^^^
You FOLLOW math so much that angular momentum causes the gyroscopic effect AFTER a right-hand rule (mnemonic device), but I can prove that wrong to people who were not trained to see it in a PARTICULAR way. Once taught -blinded. AM only sets a rate for a causal mechanism to happen within, and science don't want it, because angular momentum is a major part of the language. ua-cam.com/video/Sip_9ew2RjA/v-deo.html A child is following the scientific method by singing: "The wheels on the bus go round and round." This song describes a bus accurately and consistently exactly like math, but you would not say the child understands the bus, because wheels going round are not causal. The variables in gravity math are exactly like the wheels, they are not causal. So, what do you actually understand? Everything is like this. How does a solid know how to bend light by wavelength? When does that determination happen along the "length"? They merely mapped that to a number. What if charge changes when crammed into a nucleus and charge is not a CONSTANT. OMG, you will have to question a constant! You should start questioning everything, because I'm embarrassed for this generation of science. You can't show me dimensions 1 or 2, and Relativity changes fake dimension to CREATE your fav theory ON PAPER, while the NON-transformed reality IS STILL THERE!???
A fair debunking but we can only make small advances in theory that is consistent in tangible time and leave memory of those as newer perspectives allow only slow advances too.