Stop misusing the term "First Responder." The term you looking for is "Emergency Services." First Responders are located in very small towns that are far from the county seat. This confused the corporate talking-heads that never new there was a small town.
Someone trying to sound smart but failing miserably. The term "first responder" is used for anyone who responds to emergencies - it isn't just a low level medical certification. The certification of First Responder has been pretty much discontinued anyways as the official name is now Emergency Medical Responder. But no one gives a rats a$$ about your whining anyways. People can figure out what is being referred to.
@@mikel9567pop you are the one crying snowflake. You are a kid who doesn't understand what I am talking about. You can't get your confusion from corporate talking heads. They don't know either. Crawl back into your sandbox, and stop bothering the adults.
I'm in a big city and I am considered a first responder as an EMT. That is the term that has been used since 9/11 for anything that is police fire or EMS.
@@rolandmiller5456, It is older than that. The problem is, as I have said, that reporters didn't understand the already established need for first responders in rural areas and very small towns. The idea that the reporters became confused 20 years ago is irrelevant. The idea that you come from the city doesn't mean you have the privilege of teaching a topic that you have never imagined. You have the responsibility to learn. It is simple. You are not a first responder. You are a member of emergency services. That term describes your role better, and along with the correct definition of "first responder," that term is much older than 9/11. You know, when you were still in diapers. How can you be a first responder when you are THE responder?
Do you know what siren they use in the ambulance
Nice vid
IT looks good the rims are ugly tho they should've went with some blacked out rims or something
Yuck, Tomar
Stop misusing the term "First Responder." The term you looking for is "Emergency Services." First Responders are located in very small towns that are far from the county seat. This confused the corporate talking-heads that never new there was a small town.
Someone trying to sound smart but failing miserably. The term "first responder" is used for anyone who responds to emergencies - it isn't just a low level medical certification. The certification of First Responder has been pretty much discontinued anyways as the official name is now Emergency Medical Responder. But no one gives a rats a$$ about your whining anyways. People can figure out what is being referred to.
@@mikel9567pop you are the one crying snowflake. You are a kid who doesn't understand what I am talking about. You can't get your confusion from corporate talking heads. They don't know either. Crawl back into your sandbox, and stop bothering the adults.
I'm in a big city and I am considered a first responder as an EMT.
That is the term that has been used since 9/11 for anything that is police fire or EMS.
@@rolandmiller5456, It is older than that. The problem is, as I have said, that reporters didn't understand the already established need for first responders in rural areas and very small towns.
The idea that the reporters became confused 20 years ago is irrelevant. The idea that you come from the city doesn't mean you have the privilege of teaching a topic that you have never imagined. You have the responsibility to learn.
It is simple. You are not a first responder. You are a member of emergency services. That term describes your role better, and along with the correct definition of "first responder," that term is much older than 9/11. You know, when you were still in diapers.
How can you be a first responder when you are THE responder?