What are CHEMTRAILS? Proving they EXIST by "CAPTAIN" Joe

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 бер 2017
  • ✈️WANT TO BECOME A PILOT?✈️ bit.ly/474j06T
    📗📗📗GET MY NEW BOOK amzn.to/32TH4x7 📗📗📗
    📸 INSTAGRAM FLYWITHCAPTAINJOE: goo.gl/TToDlg 📸
    🌐MY WEBSITE: goo.gl/KGTSWK 🌐
    🛒👕---► T-SHIRT SHOP goo.gl/Svrqmx ◄ --👕-🛒
    📖👨 NEW FACEBOOK PAGE: goo.gl/heUKGb 👨📖
    ▼▼My FLIGHT-KIT I highly recommend for you guys▼▼
    MY HEADSET: amzn.to/2CrTrzz
    MY SUNGLASSES: amzn.to/2VY6FNo
    MY PILOT BAG: amzn.to/2DiWKux
    Company iPad: amzn.to/2W1zM2n
    ▼▼The VIDEO EQUIPMENT I use in my studio and outdoors▼▼
    MY CAMERA: amzn.to/2T1VK3g
    LIGHTING: amzn.to/2szSRv4
    IN-FLIGHT RECORDINGS: amzn.to/2VY7A0g
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dear friends and followers, today I´ll explain the ever so mysterious topic about chemtrails. Do they exist, or is it all just a huge rumour?
    I will present 4 different examples of possible chemtrails, with facts if they are true or false. We´ll look at wing tip vortices, wake turbulences, famous contrails in comparison to chemtrails. Black smoke coming out of engines on departures and go-around procedures.
    The rumour about chemtrails are spreading with every new idea some came up with, apparently chemtrails are used to manage solar radiation, psychological manipulation, human population control, weather modification or chemical warfare, at least that´s what I found out about it on the internet.
    To make matters worse, it causes illnesses and other health problems. And you´re saying it´s all coming out of the back of my plane? Hmm seems very superstitious if you ask me? We never had to sign a document during cockpit preparation stating, “20 tonnes of chemicals have been loaded and are ready for disposal”.
    But still, they must be somewhere?
    Okay, let´s see if we can find these chemtrails.
    Enjoy the video and share if you feel the same way about chemtrails!
    All the best and see you next thursday, your "Captain" Joe
    By the way please check out these amazing accounts who supported and provided me with great videos:
    @LouB747
    / loub747
    @Cargospotter
    / cargospotter
    @MUC-Spotter
    / @mucspotter
    @RCFORDMANN / @rcfordman
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40 тис.

  • @dabbermcdabberson7398
    @dabbermcdabberson7398 5 років тому +814

    If you clicked on this video thinking this pilot was going to expose himself you got clickbaited

  • @jayyyzeee6409
    @jayyyzeee6409 7 років тому +770

    I like you Captain Joe, but I'm not convinced. Contrails disperse relatively quickly. The things we see where I live persist in the sky and turn into clouds. They're often positioned at right angles to each other or in other patterns. Maybe you don't have them where you live, but I do. Also, if they were contrails, then I would've seen them my whole life, but these things are new like in the last 10-15 years. This is something different.

    • @Kylem6875
      @Kylem6875 7 років тому +36

      older engines didn't have as much a ratio of water to exhaust because they were generally lower bypass- and contrails remain just like clouds where they can stay relatively long up there. a bit of research goes a long way- it's almost impossible for a passenger aircraft to have any 'chemtrail' bullshit because the pilot needs to know everything which is being loaded onto the aircraft

    • @marilymtsosie4380
      @marilymtsosie4380 2 роки тому +75

      I agree with you I have them also in Cali an the plane flys back an forth an leaves trails all in the sky some-thing that use to never happen

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 Рік тому +37

      Why do clouds not dissipate quickly? They are composed of water.

    • @Luison40
      @Luison40 Рік тому +1

      You said it your self, not something that happened before, why? Maybe because airplanes have newer technologies? Hotter turbines? Besides, who the hell do you think you are to talk so sure of your self when saying that contrails dissipate quickly? You know nothing about contrails and you have proven it, they do last sometimes plenty of time, sometimes even for a whole day, so stop talking shit and lose your moronic fear to the clouds.

    • @WilliamHollinger2019
      @WilliamHollinger2019 Рік тому

      @@oscarb9139 I don't know. Maybe the reason why we believe it is because project popeye look it up. It was to cause alot of rain in Vietnam to make it easier for marine and army to advance to the enemy line.

  • @jaywoods8393
    @jaywoods8393 11 місяців тому +168

    They do this a lot here in the uk on nice clear days. They make like criss cross patterns of this fake cloud and it spreads out as it drops down very slowly .

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 11 місяців тому +11

      Yep, that's contrails. It is what it is.

    • @yassassin6425
      @yassassin6425 11 місяців тому +2

      @@elyjahstark7549
      “forecast for today, contrails long and thin. They will expand by mid day to form overcast skies.”
      Remember when you used to incessantly troll that exact sentence on multiple videos on your Keith Seigel account? I do.
      And your point about stupid MFER was?

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 11 місяців тому +2

      @@yassassin6425 "And your point about stupid MFER was?"
      I guess it is his signature and stands for: multiple failures, errors, rubbish.

    • @clydet6547
      @clydet6547 3 місяці тому

      Y'all. They outright lied to you with, "safe and effective", & "stay home, save lives". They outright lied to you when all the local news stations repeated the same bulls*it story of "manufacturer defect" with the purple/blue blacklight streetlamps all over the country and in fact the world which they installed on extreme fast-track at the same time as the 5G (Twisted Luck Truth channel shows the 5G RF nodes set-up on top of these advanced tech blacklight streetlamps). These news stations all spread the same lie about "manufacturer defect" whilst claiming it would cost no one any tax payer dollars and that the manufacturer would replace these lights at no cost. Not a SINGLE STREETLAMP has been replaced these 2 years. NOT ONE. And they are STILL SETTING UP THESE LIGHTS, ESPECIALLY AT HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS AND BANKS.

    • @kurtbradwill
      @kurtbradwill 3 місяці тому +11

      They do it on not so nice days too, you just don't see it

  • @Slacking02
    @Slacking02 9 місяців тому +65

    Operation LAC (Large Area Coverage) was a United States Army Chemical Corps operation which dispersed microscopic zinc cadmium sulfide (ZnCdS) particles over much of the United States and Canada in order to test dispersal patterns and the geographic range of chemical or biological weapons.[1]

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 9 місяців тому +1

      Which has nothing to do with the 'chemtrail' hoax, so why mention it? Is your goal false equivalence? Or to prove that the 'chemtrail' hoax isn't real?

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 9 місяців тому +2

      @@siouxperb5570let’s go Keith!!

    • @msheart2
      @msheart2 4 місяці тому

      To search.
      " Saudi Arabia launches cloud-seeding programme to increase rainfall"
      [ NGulf National News]
      "Weather Program Office [NOAA] Weather Modification."
      " Weather and Climate Modification - National Science Foundation [NSF]"
      " NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL OD-14 CUMULUS CLOUDS AND THEIR MODIFICATION
      " S.3383 (94th): National Weather Modification Policy Act Introduced: May 5, 1976
      "Owning the Weather"
      "Project Popeye"
      " Project Cumulus "
      "PROJECT WOODPECKER"
      " Project Lucy"
      " Hurricane and tornado control device "
      "ATMOSPHERIC HEATING AS A RESEARCH TOOL confex"
      "China's radical $168 million weather control system revealed: '
      "China is massively expanding its weather-modification program, saying it will be able to cover half the country in artificial rain and snow by 2025"
      " Greening a Saudi Arabian Desert"
      " China plans to use chemicals to generate rain to protect its grain harvest
      August 21, 2022 "
      " WEATHER MODIFICATION INC"
      'Climate engineering by mimicking natural dust climate control: the iron salt aerosol method'
      " H.R.4586 - Geoengineering Research Evaluation Act of 2017 "
      "Preliminary Experimental Evaluation of Snomax (TM) Snow Inducer, Nucleus Pseudomonas syringae, as an Artificial Ice for Weather Modification" 1989
      "Silica aerogel nanopowder. What geoengineers 'plan' on putting into the atmosphere and environment. "
      " Weather Modification Using Electromagnetic Beams Common Knowledge at Aquiess,Inc"

    • @Jojo_Bee
      @Jojo_Bee 4 місяці тому +7

      IF they are testing, they've been testing for far very long already...

    • @pierricclot6544
      @pierricclot6544 3 місяці тому

      unless they found and implement something@@Jojo_Bee

  • @totttrax
    @totttrax Рік тому +285

    Say what you want my man I watch them paint the sky every morning

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Рік тому +29

      Get yourself a job, that will fix it.

    • @totttrax
      @totttrax Рік тому +1

      @@curiouscat8457 I see while it on break at MY JOB u scumbag p.o.s GET A LIFE JERKOFF

    • @totttrax
      @totttrax Рік тому

      @@curiouscat8457 worthless waste of air

    • @extraterrestre2661
      @extraterrestre2661 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@curiouscat8457 Stupid humans....... So the government can do whatever it wants and you just don't care "Blah blah you need a job" and that's why the government does what it wants behind the scenes without anyone knowing and they laugh how stupid are we..... We should revolt and demand answers but you just don't want to know and prefer to continue being deceived and live your pathetic lives

    • @sk_tana
      @sk_tana 3 місяці тому

      @@curiouscat8457Get yourself a brain that functions properly.

  • @__sno__3820
    @__sno__3820 5 років тому +866

    They're putting chemicals in the water to turn the freaking frogs gay

    • @Lc-bq3hy
      @Lc-bq3hy 5 років тому +18

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @GGg-ug3jr
      @GGg-ug3jr 5 років тому +61

      Yeah it's called atrazine. Look it up

    • @oceandrew
      @oceandrew 5 років тому +9

      @@chaunceythegardener4753 Frogs can vote? Damn, you trumptards take your conspiracy theories to whole new levels.

    • @josedominguez5187
      @josedominguez5187 5 років тому +1

      Lol im sorry but this comment was so random!!

    • @oceandrew
      @oceandrew 5 років тому +3

      @@chaunceythegardener4753
      And then there's this guy (​ chauncey the gardener ) ... what a spectacle of hatred and putrid corruption. Ugh, the stench of him.

  • @MG2577
    @MG2577 3 місяці тому +21

    So when I walk in the cold and leave a contrail....it should hang out behind me for hours?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 3 місяці тому +5

      If you’re exhausting enough water to saturate the air and it’s colder than negative 40 degrees, yeah. I doubt that’s the case though.

    • @brettelmerelmer3061
      @brettelmerelmer3061 3 місяці тому +1

      Under proper atmospheric conditions (temperature, pressure, and humidity), yes.

  • @Patriot-hz8xk
    @Patriot-hz8xk Рік тому +23

    I find it very interesting that youtube throttles and deletes ACTUAL VIDEO EVIDENCE CLIPS OF THE US AIR FORCE DUMPING UNKNOWN CHEMICALS. VIDEOS RECORDED FROM WITHIN THE AIRCRAFTS!

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Рік тому +2

      There never was an "actual evidence" in any shape and form. You can't have an evidence of something what doesn't exist.
      You probably, in your blissful ignorance, mean this video:
      "KC-10 Tanker Chemtrail Sprayer 100% Proof - Filmed Up Close By AF Pilots"
      which is live and kicking on YT and which is just a spoof video of footage taken during a refueling operation. The crew is making jokes aimed at the chemtrails hoax.

    • @user-uo4ro8jo4i
      @user-uo4ro8jo4i 9 місяців тому

      By the way, NASA realesed a paper about geoengineering. Heres the link ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19930058159 - They are literally saying that they are doing it and nobody cares.

    • @stephenbogan5961
      @stephenbogan5961 3 місяці тому

      Let me guess. The mysterious "they" deleting the videos can be the only reason why you cannot find video evidence, huh...

    • @Ann-bm5qg
      @Ann-bm5qg Місяць тому +1

      Yes I’ve got some and they are from a pilot. One photograph is of a switchboard in a plane. Above one of the switches it reads Chemtrails.

    • @kripaharris237
      @kripaharris237 15 днів тому

      😂😂😂

  • @rafaelcadena44
    @rafaelcadena44 4 роки тому +635

    Had a question that I noticed you didn't cover. Why is it that in some instances these trail's literally dissipate after a while and other's do not, they literally linger all day and form to what look's like clouds eventually? I'm not denying anything you stated. I'm simply asking a question in wanting to learn. Thank you in advance...

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому +93

      In conditions of higher humidity, it will take longer for contrails to dissipate. In high volumes of air traffic, this will cause the trails to form faster than they can dissipate, creating the cloud cover you've described.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 4 роки тому +8

      If what you are saying is true, you are an unique specimen on this page :-).
      contrailscience.com/how-long-do-contrails-last/

    • @thomasfink2385
      @thomasfink2385 3 роки тому +15

      @@siouxperb5570 Exactly.

    • @thomasfink2385
      @thomasfink2385 3 роки тому +41

      @@ryanmaines6290 Your statement does not fit to the one above, which has been answered - maybe your attention span is too short.
      Back to the facts: I know that for longer than you live.
      They used silver-iodide for the first experiments as condensation kernels - to generate rain and reduce the gravity of hurricanes in assigned missions. But that is costly and legally problematic and was therefore abandoned.
      The issue of this posting is the expectation that this is done on civilian passenger aircraft èn masse. And that is not the case as Captain Joe explains.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +20

      @@ryanmaines6290 “it’s public information they are spraying heavy metals aluminum oxide, strontium, and barium” …. Is it now? Then you’ll have no problem finding evidence for those claims. Off you go

  • @LazyMcCrazy
    @LazyMcCrazy 7 років тому +2349

    You'll never stop me from wearing my tin foil hat!

    • @Alilretard1
      @Alilretard1 7 років тому +52

      But a soup pot provides a much more secure location to hide your brain. Can't believe some of you guys think tin foil is sufficient protection.

    • @MichaelShelleysmi
      @MichaelShelleysmi 7 років тому +12

      Your profile picture fits perfectly with that sentence.

    • @jknalgon3549
      @jknalgon3549 7 років тому +12

      I think a nice colander would be better. The metal part would stop incoming information while the little holes would allow vapors to escape.

    • @Alilretard1
      @Alilretard1 7 років тому +12

      A friend of mine showed up wearing a like a pirate eye patch. I asked him how how injured his eye and he flipped it up to reveal a inner tinfoil lining of the eye patch. He said it was to keep out the frequencies that had been bothering him for awhile.

    • @tin2001
      @tin2001 7 років тому +8

      J K Nalgon
      Colanders are no good. The holes will let the tiny brain fall out.

  • @garybowler5946
    @garybowler5946 Місяць тому +7

    They are spraying whipped cream and sprinkles for the sky unicorns to eat.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Місяць тому +3

      Definitely more plausible than barium aluminium and lithium. 🙂

    • @tedtalour6414
      @tedtalour6414 Місяць тому

      ​@@curiouscat8457how do you figure?

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Місяць тому +2

      @@tedtalour6414 "how do you figure?"
      Simple. I was flying commercial jets for 30 years. I've seen in my load manifests whipped cream and sprinkles plenty of times. Never any chemicals that would fit the description of the stuff "chemtrails" are allegedly made of.

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 Місяць тому +2

      Shhh! Don't give it away, the glitter horses are a classified state secret. :)

  • @TheNathanielWoods
    @TheNathanielWoods 3 роки тому +218

    He forgot to add his sponsor of the video (the chemical -elite behind the spraying of the sky’s who want to deflect, deny, and confuse what people already know is true)

    • @srira7910
      @srira7910 2 роки тому +2

      Bullshit

    • @g-sher792
      @g-sher792 2 роки тому

      Facts !!! Fuck all goverments!! You cowards need to wake up !!! Your live stock!! Your here to be a slave and be slaughtered in the end !! Pls wake up my brothers and sisters don't eat the grass and be there sheep !!!

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 2 роки тому +2

      @@g-sher792 Your should be you’re, and livestock is one word. This is an example of being poorly educated and is probably why you fall for this tripe.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 2 роки тому

      @Mystic Truth You are random.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 2 роки тому

      @Mystic Truth Your comment.

  • @laprepper
    @laprepper 4 роки тому +424

    the thing that makes me suspicious more than anything is that you see these trails get turned on and off by Jets when they're doing their patterns over a city, normal exhaust tends to dissipate quite quickly but the trail's people notice 10 to disperse very slowly over hours until the entire sky is hazy

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 4 роки тому +28

      Your observation of intermittent contrails only shows that they are contrails. Unless you can think of a logical reason for randomly turning the spray off and on randomly 6-8 miles in the sky? Just to mess with you?
      Why does normal exhaust condensation trails dissipate quite quickly? How does that happen when the air is saturated?

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 4 роки тому +21

      Are you equally worried when there is a cloud, then no cloud, then another cloud etc? Well, it is the same with contrails. And as the humidity increases, the clouds become more and more frequent eventually covering the whole sky - and contrails will become continuous and persistent. They are just clouds, after all :-).
      I explained the cross patterns about 3 times in the last 2 weeks here. Could you be bothered and search back a bit?

    • @socks2441
      @socks2441 Рік тому

      @@curiouscat8457 clouds are not real. they contain secret floating bases loaded with scientists testing and releasing new chemicals in the form of rain... ;)
      i am being sarcastic by the way.

    • @ufodrgreerexterterestreals8556
      @ufodrgreerexterterestreals8556 Рік тому

      THIS MAN IS A LIER ua-cam.com/video/NnzdHP3CfYM/v-deo.html

    • @BoxeoBam
      @BoxeoBam Рік тому +47

      Your sky starts clear, then they spray then it fishes with smog blocking the sun

  • @Ben-mk9ig
    @Ben-mk9ig Місяць тому +5

    Victory! Bobby Diddles, whose username appeared as @garrywolf3, has deleted his entire thread. This is his reply to me:
    Bobby Diddles replied: "Ben whats this got to do with you Ben? 🤣 your all so easy to tease. Another linear thinker for the heap. Finders crossed they double their efforts spraying over your house"
    Apparently he didn't like me calling him out for having the EQ of an immature ten year old. By deleting his thread, he certainly demonstrated that he is no man!

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark Місяць тому +2

      Bummer, that thread was just getting good!

  • @bendeleted9155
    @bendeleted9155 Місяць тому +4

    Let's be clear here about what you are most likely seeing. All aircraft, whether jet turbine or recip will contrail between certain flight levels, based on conditions. If you consider that the whole airmass is moving, what may look like cross-hatching sweeps of "chem trails" is usually just departures and arrivals into the airport about 100-200 miles away from you. An aircraft, especially coming off an air route for arrival past the same land-based navigation aids into the airport pattern a few minutes apart will look like very deliberate pattern of spraying to some, but spraying "chemicals" at 20,000ft plus makes little sense. When spraying chemicals for mosquito control, they spray from about 500 feet, and it looks nothing like contrails. You're ALWAYS going to see these when conditions exist for it, so you may want to look up "cloud seeding methods" or "mosquito vector control spraying methods" or "mass administration thorazine" to see the difference.

  • @totttrax
    @totttrax Рік тому +59

    Explain those miles long ones that just linger and spread out eventually creating a blanket over the whole sky though

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +2

      Persistent contrails spreading via wind shear. They're nothing new.

    • @totttrax
      @totttrax Рік тому

      Shyt bag

    • @fabriciooliveira3720
      @fabriciooliveira3720 Рік тому

      Just ignore him, if you track back the comments you will see him and his fake profiles(siouxperb5570, Curious Cat, Ben, Elyjah Stark, John Catty, Yassassin) have been commenting here for more than 3 years, at least 10k comments are from them, they are being paid to deceive the sheep and keep the narrative.
      He is doing the same in many other "contrails" videos.....

    • @user-nz3gi2lp9x
      @user-nz3gi2lp9x 6 місяців тому

      I can explain it.. those giant plumes of smoke is a geoengineering project by SAI with aluminum oxide, barium and strontium particles to modify the weather in order to perpetuate a climate crises for a globalist technocratic elite coup.

    • @Meekseek
      @Meekseek 4 місяці тому

      "Weather Program Office [NOAA] Weather Modification."
      " Weather and Climate Modification - National Science Foundation [NSF]"
      " NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL OD-14 CUMULUS CLOUDS AND THEIR MODIFICATION
      " S.3383 (94th): National Weather Modification Policy Act Introduced: May 5, 1976
      "Owning the Weather"
      "Project Popeye"
      " Project Cumulus "
      "PROJECT WOODPECKER"
      " Project Lucy"
      " Hurricane and tornado control device "
      "ATMOSPHERIC HEATING AS A RESEARCH TOOL confex"
      "China's radical $168 million weather control system revealed: '
      "China is massively expanding its weather-modification program, saying it will be able to cover half the country in artificial rain and snow by 2025"
      " Greening a Saudi Arabian Desert"
      " China plans to use chemicals to generate rain to protect its grain harvest
      August 21, 2022 "
      " WEATHER MODIFICATION INC"
      'Climate engineering by mimicking natural dust climate control: the iron salt aerosol method'
      " H.R.4586 - Geoengineering Research Evaluation Act of 2017 "
      "Preliminary Experimental Evaluation of Snomax (TM) Snow Inducer, Nucleus Pseudomonas syringae, as an Artificial Ice for Weather Modification" 1989
      "Silica aerogel nanopowder. What geoengineers 'plan' on putting into the atmosphere and environment. "
      " Weather Modification Using Electromagnetic Beams Common Knowledge at Aquiess,Inc"

  • @dazgodbold
    @dazgodbold 4 роки тому +472

    Once I get my pilot's licence I'm going to fly into one and scoop some up for a lab test.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому +71

      I have been begging conspiracy nutjobs to do this for years. None will ever do so, because they know it will destroy their hoax forever. There have been countless in-situ studies on persistent contrails, but not a single one ever done on a 'chemtrail'. Gee, wonder why?

    • @Sterlingjob
      @Sterlingjob 4 роки тому +25

      Give me your address and I will send you a fuel sample from LHR

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 4 роки тому +11

      Nutjob. They occur at very high altitudes. Your pilot certificate will not get you into a plane that can get to that altitude.

    • @rickstark85
      @rickstark85 4 роки тому +11

      @@oscarb9139 pretty sure it was a joke...

    • @AV4Life
      @AV4Life 4 роки тому +7

      Contrails usually form at about 26,000ft and above. So good luck

  • @tedhansen3846
    @tedhansen3846 3 місяці тому +8

    I worked for a minibus company that carried airline crews from the airport to the Hyatt Regency. Being a layman, I asked a pilot what was leaking out the backs of the engines and the pilot told me if that were something leaking the plane would be out of whatever it was leaking very fast...maybe just a few miles. He said it is a vapor trail made by the heat of the engines. No trail

    • @sk_tana
      @sk_tana 3 місяці тому

      I’m sure they sign NDA’s so they aren’t going to tell you the truth.

    • @Andre-vr1ul
      @Andre-vr1ul Місяць тому

      And yet it does "leak"

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark Місяць тому

      @@Andre-vr1ul Oh it does? Where does that happen?

  • @Ovijz
    @Ovijz Рік тому +12

    U can lie at the best dear captain ✈️

  • @dogs12347
    @dogs12347 7 років тому +498

    So these airliners are permitted to pollute our skies over our countries with dihydrogen-monoxide.

    • @turbocompound
      @turbocompound 7 років тому +24

      Stephen Molloy Or Oxidan, Dihydrogenether, Mon(o)oxan, Hydrogenhydroxid, Hydroxylacid....👻👻😎👍😷😷....oh, my godness....

    • @jdrake33
      @jdrake33 7 років тому +26

      Stephen Molloy
      Darn dihydrogen monoxide messing everything up!

    • @adeebighani3976
      @adeebighani3976 7 років тому +18

      Stephen Molloy dihydrogen monoxide is water...

    • @Draylogic
      @Draylogic 7 років тому +48

      +Adeeb Ighani your a fucking idiot

    • @fancypants5730
      @fancypants5730 7 років тому +15

      this pretend "captain" is paid to confuse you. Commercial planes all have COMTRAILS that's water vapor. CHEMTRAILS is done with independent contractors spraying . There are several companies doing this and for different reasons of exploration. NEVER let anyone confuse you between normal and safe contrails, coming from commercial planes from Chemtrails. look up geoengineering if you are really serious about the truth

  • @tomasjanik7590
    @tomasjanik7590 4 роки тому +318

    Why those contrails sometimes disappear really quickly behind the plane and sometimes they stay on the sky the whole day?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 4 роки тому +90

      Tomas Janik because of relative humidity. Think of the air like a towel. If the towel is dry it can absorb more moisture. Contrails that form in dry conditions quickly sublimate back into water vapor because the air can hold it. Now use a soaking wet towel. How well does it absorb extra moisture? Not very well because the towel is saturated. The same goes for contrails that form in humid air conditions. They persist as ice crystals until the ambient air can “absorb” the sublimated water vapor.

    • @tomasjanik7590
      @tomasjanik7590 4 роки тому +34

      @@elyjahstark Thank you very much for this great answer. This is exactly what I needed.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 4 роки тому +12

      Tomas Janik any time. Great question.

    • @calebreasons
      @calebreasons 3 роки тому +3

      Humidity

    • @stahlah9036
      @stahlah9036 3 роки тому +19

      Tomas Janik bc some of the lines are just water vapor , while others have added chemical compounds for different reasons. That’s why two planes with same engines at same cooorsinates , same day and time can have chemtrails , and the other nothing..

  • @barbarafels7956
    @barbarafels7956 9 місяців тому +5

    Hello, I live in south-west France, I saw this morning 5 little planes passing, (each leaving one "trail", and there were already other trails in the sky....) they were going in the same direction, one after the other during 11 minutes (i filmed them), is it possible that planes pass so "close", every 2 or 3 minutes ? Thank you !

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 9 місяців тому +3

      Look at the departures/arrivals board at some major airport and you have the answer - well, almost, the cargo traffic will not be there.
      The minimal horizontal distance between planes at the same altitudes given by the separation rules is about 9 km in the general controlled airspace, meaning, you can see planes flying by the usual cruising speed separated by only just over 30 seconds. Close to airports (terminal airspace) it drops almost to a half.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 9 місяців тому +1

      You can also find the information on ADS-B tracking sites like FR-24.

    • @onefourwhisky
      @onefourwhisky 9 місяців тому

      ua-cam.com/video/1aRt7_E5AuM/v-deo.html

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 9 місяців тому +1

      @@siouxperb5570why are you so triggered on every video. Your damage control is failing. Badly

    • @barbarafels7956
      @barbarafels7956 9 місяців тому

      @@curiouscat8457 ok thanks but I live near the mountains,.....

  • @chesterwilberforce9832
    @chesterwilberforce9832 3 місяці тому +4

    A high school friend of min posted a meme showing contrails trailing a modern commercial jet with the caption "Do you remember these when you were a kid? Me neither" as if it is some modern day nefarious new world order plot. Someone simply replied with a photo of B-17's flying over Germany in WWII leaving some impressive plumes behind them.

    • @Andre-vr1ul
      @Andre-vr1ul Місяць тому +3

      That's when this tech was being developed.

    • @SD-vy7gj
      @SD-vy7gj Місяць тому

      Plains spray contrails not perminant clouds you frightened, brainwashed slave. X

    • @Ann-bm5qg
      @Ann-bm5qg Місяць тому

      It started after WW2. The is now they have increased the frequency and regularity. It’s about six days a week in England. They let the sun in one day to try and trick us or if it’s a special day like Remembrance Day.

  • @pepijnbosvelt2526
    @pepijnbosvelt2526 7 років тому +262

    I am an Aircraft maintenance technician, now my question to Chemtrail-believers is, where would you store that stuff??

    • @Cartec09
      @Cartec09 7 років тому +26

      Have you ever serviced a KC-135 or KC-46a? If you haven't, that would be a good place to start looking where someone could store that "stuff".

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 7 років тому +33

      What he means is that the contrails that you people confuse for the 'chemtrail' hoax have a demonstrated mass of millions upon millions of pounds. Now, from that point of knowledge, where would you store that stuff? Makes it awfully hard to put any stock into the 'chemtrail' hoax now, doesn't it?

    • @Cartec09
      @Cartec09 7 років тому +6

      So you answered my question for him with a question? Intelligent.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 7 років тому +17

      No, I didn't, but apparently you missed it. Check the first statement in my reply. How can you confuse that for a question?

    • @pepijnbosvelt2526
      @pepijnbosvelt2526 7 років тому +3

      Yes, once for the us airforce in sicily, but does a KDC-10 also count, and if the "chemtrailes" are pumped into fighters, how would they dispense it

  • @fabriciooliveira3720
    @fabriciooliveira3720 Рік тому +151

    Persistent contrails and sundogs are extremely rare but for some mysterious reason we see it everyday now.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +17

      Neither of them are extremely rare. Got that pdf digested yet?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +5

      @Dan Teno Negative, sunshine! 😂

    • @28heisenberger
      @28heisenberger Рік тому +9

      Firmament

    • @PWEIcom
      @PWEIcom 10 місяців тому

      ​@@siouxperb5570give me one photo of a chemtrail filled sky before 1980
      Man is either payed off or doesn't know fuck all

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 9 місяців тому

      @@danteno9706 Call me a bot if you want, but siouxperb is right :
      Persistent contrails aren't less or more rare among contrails than it supposedly was "before chemtrails". At most there are more of them because of the augmentation of aerial traffic.
      Also, it's not a new thing at all and has been documented for a long time :
      ua-cam.com/video/X72uACIN_00/v-deo.html

  • @kenny832
    @kenny832 Рік тому +2

    You showed a “contrail” coming from your mouth - did it last for hours before finally settling on the ground or did it evaporate instantly???

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +6

      Was Joe exhaling more than a gallon of superheated water vapor in excess of 1,100 degrees F, in temperatures of -40F and colder, with Rhi of 70% and >, at pressure of 300mb and less?
      If your answer is "no", then you understand the answer to your original question.

    • @kenny832
      @kenny832 Рік тому +2

      So it’s not a very good comparison for him to make?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +3

      @@kenny832 It actually is not a good analogy, and he shouldn't have. But, he was probably trying to explain something as simply as possible.

    • @guillermoelnino
      @guillermoelnino Рік тому

      @@siouxperb5570 Point to wear on the doll where conspiracy fact hurt y ou.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +2

      @@guillermoelnino Do you understand anything about atmospheric science?
      Where is this "evidence" you keep alluding to, but never produce? Which off topic false equivalence fallacy are you afraid to deflect to, because you KNOW that whatever you produce will have nothing to do with the contrails that you and everyone else can see, and are the sole and entire source of the 'chemtrail' hoax?
      Are you wanting to bring up SAI research?
      Cloud seeding?
      Aerial application?
      HAARP?
      Come on, troll, which false equivalence fallacy are you wanting to embarrass yourself with?
      BTW, try looking up once in a while. You'll see the contrails that are what you sheep call 'chemtrails'. Try putting your phone down once in a while.

  • @augustreigns9716
    @augustreigns9716 6 років тому +527

    i've met chemtrail believers ........to them , it is a religion. 30 something year olds ...one couldn't figure out why the moon was out in the day time.....

    • @IAMinCOMMAND32
      @IAMinCOMMAND32 6 років тому +26

      I tell people that think chemtrails are that all the exhaust from the plane you see is kerosene burned off and then "frozen" in the form of sulfur and water. I tell them it's impossible for chemicals to just leak on to us from 35k feet without win drift or freezing temps carrying them away and then they get all pissed XD

    • @augustreigns9716
      @augustreigns9716 6 років тому +8

      because of your response, i suddenly feel that there is yet hope, for human beings.....god bless.

    • @augustreigns9716
      @augustreigns9716 6 років тому +4

      you believe in something, that is beautiful

    • @coyotetacticalsolutions
      @coyotetacticalsolutions 6 років тому +25

      Ive personally seen this stuff in real time near Cape Canaveral over the ocean. I have pictures documenting the entire process. Went from a perfectly clear day, to rows in the sky that dispersed over the course of about 30 minutes and stayed in the sky for hours. It left a thick haze in the entire sky that reflected all sorts of rainbow colors. Call me crazy, but even my gf who knows nothing of the phenomenon even commented how funky it started to smell.
      Weather modification exists and is a known fact that was used in the Vietnam war named Operation Popeye. Cloud seeding exists and is used daily still around the world. NASA even can generate rain storm in their Mississippi facility where they test rocket engines.

    • @mosapedoterrorist7529
      @mosapedoterrorist7529 6 років тому +11

      August Reigns chemtrails are real and these guys that dont know basic astronomy are muggs

  • @GreaseMonkeyFix
    @GreaseMonkeyFix 2 роки тому +45

    You nearly had me until you told me you’d would get back to the funny switch in the cockpit and never did.

  • @rogerbouchard7135
    @rogerbouchard7135 8 місяців тому +24

    I was in Victorville California one time and a guy was calling them Chemtrails. I asked him why would they be putting out Chemicals from an airplane. He told me it was to make people lethargic and easier to manipulate. I looked at him simply asked him if he knew he was in Victorville California. LOL

    • @neo-toad
      @neo-toad 8 місяців тому +9

      you proved what he said

    • @Meekseek
      @Meekseek 4 місяці тому +4

      @@neo-toad he did.

    • @MrrrAdryan
      @MrrrAdryan 2 місяці тому

      The people that are supposedly creating these "chem trails" would also have to live on this planet and breathe the chemicals lol, chem trails are def not a thing. Also for many reasons other than that, but you have to think critically before you choose to believe something far-fetched like this silly myth. Not talking about you, but people in general.

    • @Fakeasshit
      @Fakeasshit 2 місяці тому

      One guy told my friends friend they always jam out with Beat it, just beat it when they're in Victorville California. Hey is that Wonderland located in Victorville ? That would make the most sense , and why they-call them Trim or did you say Chemtrials ? Im getting a new dog thats what I'll call it, Beat It. Love you wonderful people, I get world class knowledge Thank You from the bottom of my heart

    • @kripaharris237
      @kripaharris237 15 днів тому

      So you believed him ....😂😂😂

  • @triggeredmonkey3439
    @triggeredmonkey3439 7 місяців тому +5

    Should have included pictures of World War II bombers creating contrails.
    Even piston engine airplanes can create contrails if the conditions provide.

    • @paratrooperlane7022
      @paratrooperlane7022 7 місяців тому

      Contrails and Chemtrails are two different things.

    • @triggeredmonkey3439
      @triggeredmonkey3439 7 місяців тому +3

      @@paratrooperlane7022
      Wow figured that out all on your own?
      Good job 🤗
      I think we've pretty much established that chemtrails discussed in the context that most people associate them with. Is right up there with Bigfoot and the Abominable Snowman.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 7 місяців тому +4

      @@paratrooperlane7022 So, once for all: how do you tell the white lines on the photos from WW2 are contrails or chemtrails?

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 7 місяців тому

      @@curiouscat8457after all these years. Still here monitoring the threads. Lol.

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 7 місяців тому +1

      @@paratrooperlane7022 "Contrails and Chemtrails are two different things."
      Technically they are the same. It's just the mind of some people who cannot understand why some contrails can persist.

  • @connorjohnson7834
    @connorjohnson7834 5 років тому +87

    I'm a crop duster, I've never flown over 1000ft

    • @mikeb769
      @mikeb769 4 роки тому +6

      Lies you flew above 1000ft when you got your lic

    • @johncarel3964
      @johncarel3964 4 роки тому +5

      @@mikeb769 how many crop dusters have you seen spraying above 1000 ft?

    • @Porcke075
      @Porcke075 4 роки тому +10

      There you go. That Captain Joe should be demoted to baggage handler. He's probably on G Soros' , Rockefeller or someone of their ilk's payroll. Maybe the EU is his employer?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 4 роки тому +5

      CC C your claim has already been proven wrong on the other thread. Repeating it just makes you sound willfully ignorant.

    • @nicholaslokos7949
      @nicholaslokos7949 4 роки тому +2

      No you are a Union Pacific 4000 series steam locomotive I s e e t h r o u g h y o u .

  • @Rob_M_
    @Rob_M_ 7 років тому +665

    and of course.... the people who believe these theories will come here to say you're paid to say they don't chem trail

    • @DanielBulyovcsity
      @DanielBulyovcsity 7 років тому +10

      easier to pollute water, 2 people/town can do it.

    • @danielhermanus6909
      @danielhermanus6909 7 років тому +5

      BrotherGreed or maybe they just don't do it at all since there's no purpose and even if there would be, which government could afford that on a large scale? Most can't even afford social security 😂

    • @CzornyLisek
      @CzornyLisek 7 років тому +9

      There is dumping of things like dry ice and other chemicals to made raining -> so called cloud seeding. It was used for example in Beijing olympics event, all around Bejing planes sprayed chemical from few km so that there would be no rain over olimpic city and to dump all contaminated things in air into sewers.
      But such occasions are very very rare and're monitored very well. Well even number of planes that can do this is very very small.
      In war it is possible to use some (military)planes to do cloud seeding. But generally You don't even need planes to do that and it's also a thing that happens naturaly anyway.

    • @thedroplett214
      @thedroplett214 7 років тому +1

      you don't need to pay some1 to do this. a threat is enough.

    • @TheUglyGnome
      @TheUglyGnome 7 років тому +67

      I know for a fact that that the chemical in chemtrails is dihydrogen monoxide. They exist. That's a fact.
      That's the same chemical the government puts in our water supplies.

  • @dirkswart8950
    @dirkswart8950 3 місяці тому +4

    So what's in the fuel you're dumping overboard it's not like it doesn't pollute

    • @hardcoredoom5892
      @hardcoredoom5892 2 місяці тому

      No one’s “dumping” anything overboard. 😂 Jesus, man. Get educated or shut up.

  • @Theresa1057
    @Theresa1057 10 місяців тому +2

    So much for the clean air act

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 10 місяців тому +2

      Pretty sure the clean air act doesn’t apply to water in the sky

  • @PoonScurvy
    @PoonScurvy Місяць тому +3

    Technically water is a chemical. Checkmate.

  • @dajmos6969
    @dajmos6969 4 роки тому +282

    But why the trails are sometimes dissappearing after a while and sometimes falls down slowly making one huge transcendent clouds?

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 4 роки тому +18

      Why don't you follow the comments here scrolling down a bit to find out?

    • @lukam8815
      @lukam8815 3 роки тому +39

      because sometimes the air is soo humid that it goes wayy down and thus the "chemtrail" falls down and disperses

    • @InanisNihil
      @InanisNihil 3 роки тому +44

      note ww2.. its was KNOWN.. and usa bombers and fighter where told the average hieght to expect these trails.. thus told to fly lower to avoid leaving trail to not be a visible to the germans and shoot down as easy...
      humans have a bad habit of MAKING UP SHIT for the sake of NEEDING TO HAVE AN ANSWER no matter how wrong it is... rather then just admit they dont know let alone accept the science that doesnt fit what they WANT TO BELIEVE...
      its why religion exist..
      gods literally exist for the same reason these conspiracies exist..
      PEOPLE DONT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE or how to explain it.. so they then CLAIM its this or that.. which is silly... if u dont know what it is then how can u say its this thing or that thin..?!
      basically "i dont know therefore god" butt thats silly.. cause YOU DONT KNOW so how u KNOW its god..?!!?!?!?
      humans - oh my god.. what are those lines coming from planes.. i dont... therefore it must be some evil plan by the elites.. 🤦‍♀️

    • @begit1234
      @begit1234 3 роки тому +26

      Fruity Damian, Ignore the paid shills, Geoengineering watch is a good place to start learning about geoengineering/chemtrails
      www.geoengineeringwatch.org/category/aircraft-spraying-videos/
      I don't respond to paid shills, but they will respond to this post because they are doing their job.

    • @ereder1476
      @ereder1476 3 роки тому +3

      Because you have a hero in your neighbourhood spraying windex to fight against chemtrails ua-cam.com/video/d0Jw4liXKBY/v-deo.html

  • @hombreguerro4767
    @hombreguerro4767 2 роки тому +53

    I live near Cleveland, I’ve watched these planes for hrs at a time, they always do it just south of Cleveland a little to the east maybe about 40 miles south east of the city, when they do it the trails always end up being parallel to each other and crossed, it lingers in the air for hrs until it forms what looks like clouds or turns the whole sky into like a fog 🌫 🌫 🌫 🌫 🌫 🌫 🌫 I’ll see like 3 or 4 planes at a time super high up then they vanish I’ll start noticing other planes then they kind of vanish and so on, I know they are not going to the airport because I live super close to the airport and I know the commercial flights take off and landing route because they literally fly right over me, wtf is this crap already

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +12

      They are planes flying to airports that aren’t near you, hence why they are at cruising altitude. They are called contrails, and they persist when the atmospheric relative humidity is increasing, signs of an advancing weather front.

    • @demonride15
      @demonride15 2 роки тому +8

      @@elyjahstark stop answering everyone’s comments on here dam lmao.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +5

      @@demonride15 Why? Why would I deprive myself of the entertainment chemtrail believers offer? Also, for those honestly confused and seeking answers, do you think they should just be led to deception by con artists trolling UA-cam videos? You don’t think they should be given verifiable answers and evidence to their questions?

    • @hombreguerro4767
      @hombreguerro4767 2 роки тому +5

      @@elyjahstark Alex Jones was right

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +2

      @@hombreguerro4767 About???

  • @dakotastein9499
    @dakotastein9499 7 місяців тому +4

    nothing "dumped" at that height would do anything to us anyway

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 7 місяців тому

      Not necessarily true. It does apply to fuel though - it evaporates long before it hits the ground.

  • @distancejunkiemonkey4491
    @distancejunkiemonkey4491 7 місяців тому +2

    Funny how in the northern California valley there will be no contrails for months. Oh, there are always jets flying over with a contrails that last maybe one minute at the most, but no long lasting contrails for months on end. And then just one day out of all those months, they’ll be multiple contrails that last all day. Isn’t it interesting how the meteorological conditions are just right for that for just that one day out of several months?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 7 місяців тому +3

      Funny how seasons and atmospheric science work. Who knew summers in Northern California are notoriously dry and then when fall rolls in, suddenly the temperatures drop and the relative humidity rises with more cloud cover and advancing cold fronts. Phenomenal observation!

    • @distancejunkiemonkey4491
      @distancejunkiemonkey4491 7 місяців тому

      @@elyjahstark funny how your seasons change for only one day lol

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 7 місяців тому +2

      @@distancejunkiemonkey4491 Oh if only you understood how dumb your comment was

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 7 місяців тому +3

      @@distancejunkiemonkey4491 You never experienced one sunny day followed by few weeks of rainy weather or vice versa? What planet do you live on?

    • @onefourwhisky
      @onefourwhisky 7 місяців тому +2

      Isn’t it interesting you did not post the time/ date or identity of the chemtrail planes... Are you unable to read a watch or calendar or ADS-B return ????

  • @sheleg4807
    @sheleg4807 Рік тому +239

    Chemtrails are used to block the sun rays because the sun rays contain crucial information the human body needs.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +21

      Interesting. What information is contained in sun rays?

    • @fabriciooliveira3720
      @fabriciooliveira3720 Рік тому

      ​@@siouxperb5570 the mistery of six fake profiles posting more than 10.000 comments only in this video and they are posting in lots more "contrail" videos.
      What this people do?
      do they have a life?
      what is the motivation to defend this narrative so diligently?

    • @theliamofella
      @theliamofella Рік тому +2

      I think they have blocked the common sense in your mind, maybe If you get some sun rays you will be smarter than a zombie

    • @theliamofella
      @theliamofella Рік тому +16

      @@fabriciooliveira3720 you need some sun rays get some information too ,

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +9

      @@fabriciooliveira3720 Ok, could you explain, once and for all, what you mean by "fake profile"? That has to be one of the most comically baffling phrases you keep babbling about. Explain yourself.

  • @MrCoffeeBreak
    @MrCoffeeBreak 5 років тому +98

    Wow! This new technology we have today is great! The new planes make the contrails last all day long instead of disappearing shortly after being created, like back in the day. Ah, science! :)

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 5 років тому +6

      Unintended consequence of turbofan engines. But, better for the environment because of their increased efficiency. Not much you can do about the contrails.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 5 років тому +6

      It's all good man. Probably not an option, but moving to an area under fewer airways would solve the sky problem for you. Just saying.

    • @Luison40
      @Luison40 Рік тому +3

      You should start going to school instead of saying nonsense, I bet you didn’t even finish high school

    • @MoneylessWorld
      @MoneylessWorld Рік тому

      This virtue signaler or troll likes being poisoned at the speed of science.
      Ah, science! Certain death.

    • @MrCoffeeBreak
      @MrCoffeeBreak Рік тому +1

      @@Luison40 I finished school. It is You who needs more education, or to wake up and pull your head out of your ass.

  • @debrabrower3864
    @debrabrower3864 10 місяців тому +4

    You don't need to understand the science. Just ask yourself. 1, Who researched the intial chemical? 2, Where is it made? 3, Who is transporting it? 4, Who is loading it? Since this has been happening for over 50 years there should be hundreds of whistleblowers over the years. Where is the paper trail. Every real conspiracy has paperwork. Cigarette company for instance. The whistleblowers never seem to have names of where they worked and the dates they worked there. Just say i was in the airforce but fail to mention which base? Which year? Under whose command. Why do you think that is?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 10 місяців тому +2

      Don't throw logic at the hoax believers. It makes them sad. 😢

    • @Ann-bm5qg
      @Ann-bm5qg Місяць тому

      The company spraying us in the Midlands, England is a company called 2 Exel by East Midlands airport. Our government have a policy called the Geo engineering policy which has its own solar department in ways to modify and block out the sun. The company spraying our skies was set up by 2 Red Arrow RAF pilots. They operate from Manchester with other all small airports down south Devon area . It's clear there more to this than trying to be little information that is very easy to see. Contract signed by the director Mr Singh.

  • @mattjohnston7686
    @mattjohnston7686 3 місяці тому +4

    It's just the exhaust from the jet engines. Like the exhaust from your vehicle on a cold day. Those Jets fly at a high altitude where the air is cold, and you are able to see the condensation from the exhaust.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 3 місяці тому +1

      "Those Jets fly at a high altitude where the air is cold, and you are able to see the condensation from the exhaust."
      Close, but not true. This "almost true" explanation is being exploited by chemtards to "debunk" the contrails "theory" all the time.
      A typical airliner is releasing about 15 liters of water per each mile of its travel. This is not enough to create a visible cloud. What you see is condensed (or more accurately, "deposited") supercooled ambient moisture that "snap-froze" due to the action of the engines - that includes them adding extra water. See video "click heat science" for demonstration how it works.
      A visible contrail contains less than 0.1% of the water from the engines.

    • @Eruptionvr2000
      @Eruptionvr2000 Місяць тому

      Why non on Saturday, but 100,s on Sunday??

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Місяць тому

      @@Eruptionvr2000 For the same reason as there was (for instance) sunny on Saturday and raining on Sunday. Change in atmospheric conditions.

  • @El.Chef.Guevara
    @El.Chef.Guevara 6 років тому +313

    Humanity is becoming stupidier without the aid of any chemicals

    • @SilverFan8
      @SilverFan8 6 років тому +2

      Not unless you count drugs as chemicals.

    • @ketmax2805
      @ketmax2805 6 років тому +6

      to be honest,every thing is a chemical

    • @lionpaws2262
      @lionpaws2262 6 років тому

      almost everythink

    • @davidbarry9690
      @davidbarry9690 6 років тому

      Daniel O. Give that man a drink haha

    • @ellisjackson3355
      @ellisjackson3355 5 років тому

      Daniel O. That's what you think

  • @andie_pants
    @andie_pants 3 роки тому +31

    This comment section is a gold mine!

    • @msheart2
      @msheart2 4 місяці тому

      Right gold mine.
      " Saudi Arabia launches cloud-seeding programme to increase rainfall"
      [ NGulf National News]
      "Weather Program Office [NOAA] Weather Modification."
      " Weather and Climate Modification - National Science Foundation [NSF]"
      " NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL OD-14 CUMULUS CLOUDS AND THEIR MODIFICATION
      " S.3383 (94th): National Weather Modification Policy Act Introduced: May 5, 1976
      "Owning the Weather"
      "Project Popeye"
      " Project Cumulus "
      "PROJECT WOODPECKER"
      " Project Lucy"
      " Hurricane and tornado control device "
      "ATMOSPHERIC HEATING AS A RESEARCH TOOL confex"
      "China's radical $168 million weather control system revealed: '
      "China is massively expanding its weather-modification program, saying it will be able to cover half the country in artificial rain and snow by 2025"
      " Greening a Saudi Arabian Desert"
      " China plans to use chemicals to generate rain to protect its grain harvest
      August 21, 2022 "
      " WEATHER MODIFICATION INC"
      'Climate engineering by mimicking natural dust climate control: the iron salt aerosol method'
      " H.R.4586 - Geoengineering Research Evaluation Act of 2017 "
      "Preliminary Experimental Evaluation of Snomax (TM) Snow Inducer, Nucleus Pseudomonas syringae, as an Artificial Ice for Weather Modification" 1989
      "Silica aerogel nanopowder. What geoengineers 'plan' on putting into the atmosphere and environment. "
      " Weather Modification Using Electromagnetic Beams Common Knowledge at Aquiess,Inc"

  • @fredhinck9685
    @fredhinck9685 Рік тому

    And the Leprechaun's pot of gold is at the end of the rainbow.

  • @twistedoak69
    @twistedoak69 5 місяців тому +1

    is this guy saying that Stratospheric aerosols for use in SRM don't exist?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 5 місяців тому +3

      And this parroted false equivalence fallacy is even more irrelevant to the subject of this video. Try researching any of the branches of research entailing SRM

  • @robertslugg8361
    @robertslugg8361 6 років тому +10

    There is a certain irony in the recent complaints about the more persistent contrails in the sky. They are due to the development of the high-bypass turbofan engine which started to replace the turbojets in service a few decades ago. The turbojet uses thrust generated solely by the expanding exhaust as a means to propel the plane. The exhaust gasses exit at high velocity and high temperature, and therefore are widely dispersed by turbulence before cooling sufficiently to condense into a large, but mostly transparent contrail. In contrast, the turbo fan engine uses the exhaust gasses to mechanically drive a large fan at the front of the engine to generate the majority of the thrust. As the exhaust passes through the additional turbine disks needed to drive the fan, it slows in velocity and cools, so that when it exits the rear of the engine it can condense more quickly into a thick contrail. In addition, this central core exhaust plume is surrounded by a thick layer of cool air from the bypass fan which helps to contain the water vapor, thus enabling it to cool faster while the water molecules produced by combustion are still in close proximity. The irony comes from the complainers not realizing that turbofan engines are 50% more fuel efficient than turbojets, so the appearance of persistent contrails is a "better" thing. But hey, why let simple physics get in the way of a good conspiracy.

    • @doktork3406
      @doktork3406 6 років тому

      answe to the guy's quetstion chemtard !

    • @ketmax2805
      @ketmax2805 6 років тому

      Tony Browne
      fucking answer it you chem trail fuck

    • @andytyler3845
      @andytyler3845 6 років тому +1

      Robert Slugg. Thank you Robert. Very well said. The flat earth. Idiots with their aluminum foil hats will never undstand.

  • @loganseales682
    @loganseales682 7 років тому +347

    Oh man haha I knew it would be a crop duster haha 😂 nice one Joe

  • @unwoke1652
    @unwoke1652 10 місяців тому +1

    Even Diesel-engined WWII bombers created contrails. My young bro, degree summa cum laude, is a flat earther and chemtrail believer. He doesn't believe it's contrails.
    I know a retired veteran 747 pilot who never dumped fuel, also a 737 pilot told me that, in 15000 hrs of flying, he never had to dump fuel. It is a rare occurrence.
    One can only 😂😂😂 at the "chemtrail switch" taking the pi$$ out of chemtraliots.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 10 місяців тому

      It's truly baffling that yoyr brother, as a college graduate, cant understand the nath that proves that the 'chemtrail' hoax us absolutely impossible.

  • @daniellecrawford6933
    @daniellecrawford6933 5 місяців тому +1

    There's a difference between contrails and
    Centrals

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 5 місяців тому +1

      "There's a difference between contrails and
      Centrals"
      100% correct, regardless of what those "centrals" are.

  • @firework121
    @firework121 7 років тому +298

    Hi, can you propably do a video about Cost Index? Would be great!

    • @user-ek7ij6vo3b
      @user-ek7ij6vo3b 7 років тому

      Good question :)

    • @derisim
      @derisim 7 років тому +5

      Mate, the cost index it's simple to understand. it's the relation between fuel eficiency and speeds. The higher the cost index the higher the speeds but also the higer the fuel consumption. Imagine that you put a cost index in the fmc of 30 then your cruze speed will be Mach 0.70 but if you put a cost index of 35 your speed will be 0.72 (pay atention, this values are just for example and not in reality). The FMC (flight managment computer) will manage the speed and fuel consuption according to the cost index. But i believe that Joe will maka a video about that.

    • @firework121
      @firework121 7 років тому +1

      derisim Thanks for your answer, appreiciate it! :)

    • @derisim
      @derisim 7 років тому +1

      firework121 no problem, if you have any more doubts be my guest, send a message and I will try to answer you ASAP ;)

    • @HB-ps6rn
      @HB-ps6rn 7 років тому +3

      tysdaddy970 Funnily enough I study at Colorado State University, but that article you refer to was a 1975 study of blocking solar radiation in the atmosphere using carbon dust (non-toxic) in order to study the potential for reducing rising sea temperatures. It is a very cheap process to do, just about as much as a normal flight. It might also be better to refer to the article properly as 'Weather Modification by Carbon Dust Absorption of Solar Energy', from William M. Gray et.al.

  • @DonHampo
    @DonHampo Рік тому +290

    I also have a few questions that I just can't find a plausible answer to: Why do contrails almost always form in front of the sun? Especially at sunrise and sunset? and why is the sun no longer able to dissolve them? I can well remember that something like this never existed more than 20 years ago. Especially in summer, the sun has dissolved fog and clouds in a very short time. Today, in midsummer, a very black cloud can cover the sun for hours without dissipating or raining down, while the rest of the sky is clear ? Why do contrails appear at night only before the full moon, which do not dissolve?

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Рік тому +40

      Contrails appear in front of sun only if they are in the straight line between the observer and the sun. Move the the observer (move your ass :-)) some distance and - the contrails will be somewhere else. It is called "perspective" :-).
      The rest of your questions is just a basic meteorology. Contrails are clouds and behave that way. Look up why sometimes clouds hang around for ages and other time dissolve in minutes and you have all your answers. The statement "something like this never existed more than 20 years ago" is totally false. The laws of physics haven't changed for the last few billion years.
      "contrails appear at night only before the full moon" - again, totally false. Moon phases have nothing to do with contrails forming.

    • @karinamanning7755
      @karinamanning7755 Рік тому

      Contrails will disappear in a few minutes. Those that do not disappear for a long time, while expanding - these are chemical trails.

    • @garryclark6817
      @garryclark6817 Рік тому +33

      I remember "contrails" hanging (what looked) a couple of hundred feet from the back of the plane and disappearing at the same speed the plane is travelling.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark Рік тому +8

      @@garryclark6817 That still happens. The ambient air is dry and can hold more moisture. If, however. The ambient air is saturated, the contrail will persist

    • @garryclark6817
      @garryclark6817 Рік тому +7

      @@elyjahstark out of curiosity, do you believe no solor radiation management is taking place in say, the uk corporation or that of the us corporation?

  • @onefourwhisky
    @onefourwhisky 11 місяців тому +6

    time for the July 3 edition of NAME THAT CHEMTRAIL PLANE !!!!
    all you have to do it ID the planes that are producing "chemtrails" ... it is so simple it only takes seconds for plane spotters, Aviation enthusiast. pilots and ATC to id the planes ... even my 8year old niece can make a positive identification of the airplanes
    all you have to do is
    see a plane producing a chemtrail
    cite specifically the time and date you see the plane
    cite specifically the location ... state and city and/or county
    cite specifically the altitude
    cite the flight number and or the registration n-number
    it is so simple, there is no valid excuse not to post the identity of the "chemtrail" planes

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 11 місяців тому

      Why does altitude matter. A chemical trail at any altitude is still a chemical trail. This is old technology. We killed millions of people decades ago with lesser technology with Agent Orange…or do you call those contrails too? Chemtrails are not the result of commercial airliners. So this video is irrelevant. Just like all of your arguments over the past decades. Sorry v, you are losing, all day every day.

    • @Ben-mk9ig
      @Ben-mk9ig 11 місяців тому +2

      @@elyjahstark7549 Agent Orange has led to the deaths of approximately 300,000 US troops, and 400,000 Vietnamese. You will, of course, ignore this information because you cannot help but to exaggerate.
      What I would like to know is what do you think was the purpose for the use of Agent Orange?

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 11 місяців тому +1

      @@Ben-mk9ig you are a liar. Your statistics are only from 1962-1971. Yawn…zzzzboring. There are still people dying today from Agent Orange. Millions of people have died due to the known toxic effects of Agent Orange. There are still millions of dollars in lawsuits still happening today. I mean, who do you really think you are fooling? Every time you post, you create another Chemtrail believer. Thank you for your service.
      Now, are you claiming Agent Orange to be a contrail? Or is it a known before used deadly chemical trail? Like we have all been telling you, Chemtrail technology is very old. It’s decades old. Chemtrailing is nothing new. As we proved, the deadly chemical trail Agent Orange is responsible for the death of millions of people and the destruction of our environment. Hmmm, kinda like what everyone is complaining about today. So this physics and math, which you have failed, has already been proven to be a successful application and use on the environment. Boom!
      I have to ask, why have you been on these threads for a decade begging people to believe your lies? All of this is public knowledge. Thank you for creating more believers. We all appreciate you Siouxpurb.

    • @Ben-mk9ig
      @Ben-mk9ig 11 місяців тому +2

      @@elyjahstark7549 _"Your statistics are only from 1962-1971."_
      No, The statistics I presented are the overall deaths to date. The years of exposure are 1962 - 1971.
      "_ I have to ask, why have you been on these threads for a decade begging people to believe your lies?"_
      I joined October 4, 2021. I know how challenging you find numbers, so I'll tell you that was 1 year, 9 months and 1 day ago. In case you don't know, a decade is 10 years.

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 11 місяців тому

      @@Ben-mk9igBen, any one can Google the effects if Agent Orange. There are still people dying today. My ex girlfriends father is suffering from it as well. You are clueless. There are still millions in dollars being paid out for the damage done by such Chemtrails. So again, you are a liar. There are more and more Agent Orange Chemtrail cases every year from long term exposure. Children of those exposed are also getting sick from Agent Orange Chemtrails. But we know why you are denying and using multiple profiles. We all know you have a problem with telling the truth. But that is the purpose of the military online personality program. Deny all facts and truth. Yawnnnn….boring…ZZZzzzz
      In essence this proves that chemtrailing is very old technology. The math and physics are verified and validated. Chemtrailing deadly chemicals is nothing new. Why are you in denial. Why are you so triggered?

  • @ilonagunszebn2674
    @ilonagunszebn2674 Місяць тому +1

    maybe they spray some kind of sedative to keep people in a state of sleep 😃
    🐑

  • @joedrock2
    @joedrock2 3 місяці тому +3

    Contrails were rare and more high altitude in the 80s. These things stay, sink, and spread out in the sky. Contrails disappear as theyre being made, we could see them getting shorter

    • @Ben-mk9ig
      @Ben-mk9ig 3 місяці тому +3

      _"Contrails disappear as theyre being made"_
      Who says? You? You cannot define reality by fabricating your own definitions. Contrails, just like any other cloud, persist as long as the ambient relative humidity allows.

    • @bigmac5859
      @bigmac5859 Місяць тому

      Weren't it Concorde back then and not jets

  • @kourounir
    @kourounir 4 роки тому +106

    My boss is also working at an airport and the pilots there know about chem-trails as well as that these certain planes mainly take off from a particular American base. So, it's not a conspiracy theory when knowledge of it comes from common people with no interest in selling books...

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому +17

      Yeah, ok. Why don't you go ask any of these pilots yourself. They will laugh in your face. The 'chemtrail' hoax is physically and mathematically impossible, and every pilot on the planet understands this.

    • @kourounir
      @kourounir 4 роки тому +15

      @@siouxperb5570 Apparently not those particular ones. Dude I have nothing to gain from saying this nor a random pilot that happened to see it. I am not a conspiracy theorist but this is the only theory that happened to confirm by chance. And maybe finally there are secrets out there that they don't tell us. That's the only reason why I made this comment.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 4 роки тому +6

      @@kourounir There are not "particular ones" outside of mental institutions where you can find them in the company of Napoleons.

    • @kourounir
      @kourounir 4 роки тому +4

      @@curiouscat8457 I hope that is not true as they are still flying planes 😁

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 4 роки тому +7

      @@kourounir Can I have some of the stuff you've been smoking?

  • @lauracotter3725
    @lauracotter3725 Рік тому +138

    Currently, the spraying is still going on every day. People seem to be oblivious or just don't care. I'm in New Jersey and miss seeing normal sunshine or normal storms of any kind. The people in charge of the spraying have gotten better trying to hide what they do. The trails can now be formed in short bursts with a mixture that produces a single puffy cumulus cloud to really make people think this is real. But the mixture is made to expand the cloud into a large one. Eventually, the sky is so full of the large ones anyone paying attention would tell you they look ridiculous.....nothing Nature would make. And then they clump together to cover the blue sky behind them. Spraying in rows that expand looks silly, but hard to watch because they expand to form a solid layer so quickly you miss the process. There is information online about what tests have shown the clouds are made of. I can't imagine how deadly all of it is. Metals like aluminum, barium, and others and lots of other substances so small are all sprayed to enter our lungs. Recently graphene has been found too....sound familiar? I should have said graphite, the other name for deadly poisonous lead. Added here, April of 2023.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +16

      People aren't oblivious. We simply understand what persistent contrails are and WHY they cannot possibly be 'chemtrails'.

    • @Ben-mk9ig
      @Ben-mk9ig Рік тому +10

      _"I should have said graphite, the other name for deadly poisonous lead."_
      Everything you have written is nonsense, but the last sentence confirms your ignorance. I suppose because what we call pencil lead is really graphite you actually think they're the same? You could not be more laughingly wrong! Graphite and graphene are allotropes of pure carbon. Lead is an entirely different element. Maybe you should learn some of that science you slept through in school before posting any more embarrassingly ignorant comments.

    • @swilleh_
      @swilleh_ Рік тому

      go pray for your god and go fuck yourself

    • @rosecitydevil
      @rosecitydevil Рік тому +6

      COVID Clouds, my seasonal allergies get worse every year also.

    • @rosecitydevil
      @rosecitydevil Рік тому +9

      @@siouxperb5570 you don't know what your talking about do you? I bet you think the moon landings were real too

  • @Jordan23-G.O.A.T.
    @Jordan23-G.O.A.T. 6 місяців тому +3

    Okay that's all good and dandy but we are talking about the actual chemical trails left in the sky that usually Criss-Cross each other and after about an hour turn into a huge cloud

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 6 місяців тому +3

      Hello,
      How do we know that what we observe is chemicals (other than usual exhaust gases (mostly steam and CO₂ afaik) and ambiant moisture)?

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 6 місяців тому +2

      Are you surprised by aircraft flying in different directions? Ever noticed a natural cloud cover normally starts from a small cloud and gradually develops all over the sky? The same principle, perfectly explained by the science of meteorology. What mysteries are you trying to uncover here?

    • @guillermoelnino
      @guillermoelnino 6 місяців тому

      ​@@curiouscat8457did y ou ever consider factors beyond "its just clouds bro"? Of course not. Y ou r NPC response tree is incspable of nuance.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 6 місяців тому +1

      @@guillermoelnino Do you have evidence that they are anything but clouds? That’s your burden of proof. Until then, I’ll go with the verifiable in situ measurements and laws of conservation of mass.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 6 місяців тому +3

      @@guillermoelnino Why should I be considering alternatives that VERIFIABLY don't and can't exist?

  • @EndtimeElijah
    @EndtimeElijah Рік тому +1

    I expect Captain Joe believes the Americans walked on a Light, AKA The Moon.
    Genesis 1:16
    And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Рік тому +3

      "And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also."
      And he also created imbeciles posting stupid comments on YT...

  • @TonyMontana-vo8nd
    @TonyMontana-vo8nd 5 років тому +159

    Captain Joe works for the company :)

    • @yassassin6425
      @yassassin6425 5 років тому +5

      Yes, that'll be Cargolux. What's your point?

    • @santu1996
      @santu1996 5 років тому

      @Tony lol

    • @kurthubbard-beale5003
      @kurthubbard-beale5003 5 років тому +2

      Exactly someone with a little common sense at last ! 👍

    • @johnrau2873
      @johnrau2873 4 роки тому +3

      Like captain kangaroo

    • @B30smo
      @B30smo 4 роки тому +13

      These guys are paid to lie. Care to explain why they are drawing satanic pentagrams and crosses with chemtrails over christian families ? If you do your research you'll understand that they're all in on it and that the web of corruption is huge and involves scientists, politicians, media, military, intelligence agencies, finance, multinationals and the vatican. Look up ted gunderson. Many good men have died for exposing the truth and this bozo is staining their memories with his satanic lies. He's either a complete brainwashed fool or paid to lie. Alister crowley worshipped the devil and admitted to sacrificing 150 children a year without ever facing prosecution. Do not be fooled. Albert Pike, Alister Crowley and so on. They try to make you sound crazy and silence you if you tell the truth about them. Spirit cooking (you'll find the same pentagrams there along with some 666s), GeorGia Guidestones (6eor6ia 6uidestones), pizzagate, their handsigns. Even the CIA admits some of it on their online library. The truth is in front of your eyes. The role of government, police, army and intelligence agency is to protect its people and its nation. They have been hijacked from their functions and tricked into this satanic religion which is all about lies, theft, corruption and murder. You are financing your own genocide and listening to the sweet lies of one of their puppets rather than facing the harsh truth. That they lie and your government no longer serves your interests but their own. Most people are too scared to tell the truth, afraid to die or afraid of retaliation and losing their reputation, wealth and status. We are ruled by cowards who have sold their souls and do not serve their function anymore but commit treason and one day they will face justice. See you in hell.

  • @MrShaunG
    @MrShaunG 5 років тому +250

    You're just a government agent, i knew it!

    • @vinir591
      @vinir591 4 роки тому +1

      Lol

    • @AbdallaAwad
      @AbdallaAwad 4 роки тому +3

      Yes, looks like he meant to decline it, not just a video

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 4 роки тому +2

      Tommie Reid No, it is a video to show the stupid what causes contrails.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 4 роки тому +1

      Tommie Reid Who is “THEY”? Fool. And what is your evidence that THEY admitted doing it? It can’t be a secret and public knowledge, now can it? If they admit it, then your logic that this video is a deflection is stupid.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 4 роки тому +3

      @Tommie Reid You are the one who comes with no evidence, and claims the "they", "them", "elites", "illuminati"....
      It's like dealing with my brothers kids. You clowns fall for every silly video on youtube.
      I dont create content on my channel. I didn't know I even had a channel until another fool like yourself pointed it out.
      Maybe you can explain why:
      pilots would fly in toxic clouds.
      pilots would spray over their homes.
      pilots would spray over government buildings.
      who is "spraying"
      how much is being "sprayed."
      what is being "sprayed".
      what effects are intended.
      There, that ought to keep you busy. If there is a way to get paid for pointing out the stupidity of chemtrail believersPlease let me know. Where did you ever get the 50 cents per negative comments information?

  • @guillermoelnino
    @guillermoelnino 22 дні тому +1

    Morning chem deniers. Or I guess for y ou it's evening. Since y ou guys are in an office in Bangladesh.

  • @tachblack4541
    @tachblack4541 Рік тому +8

    You are blinking a lot🧐

  • @user-ok1he9ll2s
    @user-ok1he9ll2s 6 років тому +10

    That chemtrail switch 😂😂

  • @ironmanmachine
    @ironmanmachine 5 років тому +245

    How did you keep a straight face while listing the reasons chemtrails exist? 😂

    • @deannamaasbach6720
      @deannamaasbach6720 5 років тому +1

      ua-cam.com/video/3H80W6TbXd0/v-deo.html

    • @HenryLeaf
      @HenryLeaf 5 років тому +21

      @@DesertSky928 Nothing is being sprayed in the sky . You are seeing water condensation in the form of snow crystals. Go read contrailscience.com carefully so you have the correct science explanation.

    • @Lauren-gs1eh
      @Lauren-gs1eh 5 років тому +2

      Paid Gov't Debunker www.federalregister.gov/documents/search?conditions%5Bterm%5D=Chemtrails
      Here’s a real link

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 5 років тому +13

      @@Lauren-gs1eh The federal register returns a search with 1 document containing the word 'chemtrail'. But, when you type in "bigfoot" it returns 4 documents. If you type "unicorns", it returns 119 documents. Do you understand why, or do you need the explanation spoon fed to you?

    • @gordonbrittas4842
      @gordonbrittas4842 5 років тому +3

      @@siouxperb5570 Perhaps they are dropping chemicals to quiet down bigfoot?

  • @tinefurlan
    @tinefurlan 10 місяців тому +1

    If 600 deegres vapor condense into droplets and then into ice they should be falling, but they do not. Even two planes meet in the sky, one "contrail" persist and one desipate quickly. And elevation difference is not more than 2km on 10km cruising speed. So, something is not adding up.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 10 місяців тому +4

      "If 600 deegres vapor condense into droplets and then into ice they should be falling, but they do not."
      Strangely enough, you are not wondering why cirrus clouds (composed from the same stuff) are not falling either. Even weirder: you are suggesting "chemtrails" (mostly "heavy metals", right?) have no problems defying gravity.
      For the reason for the "strange" phenomenon do a bit of study on "terminal velocity and the size of the falling object".
      "Even two planes meet in the sky, one "contrail" persist and one desipate quickly. And elevation difference is not more than 2km on 10km cruising speed."
      LOL 2km altitude difference! That's HUGE. Look up "lapse rate".
      The envelope of atmospheric conditions in which contrails form is quite narrow. Even a few meters can sometimes make the difference between the "right" conditions (especially relative humidity) and the "wrong" conditions. Look up images of "flat cloudbase" where you find a perfectly flat and sharply bordered layers of air - one containing dense cumulus clouds and the lower one completely free of condensation. Nothing unusual. Why do you find it strange in contrails, that are nothing else but clouds?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 10 місяців тому +2

      "So, something is not adding up."
      The only thing not adding up is the return on investment of the taxpayer funding of your basic education.

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 9 місяців тому

      ​@@curiouscat8457 I'd also add that at those altitudes, you can't properly estimate highness of planes, at least for two reasons : 1- human eye is pretty bad at it. 2- Planes don't have the same size (for instance : 737 : 35m of wingspan, and for the 777, 60m).

    • @msheart2
      @msheart2 4 місяці тому

      They are engineering the weather and climate.
      Here search these terms.
      " Saudi Arabia launches cloud-seeding programme to increase rainfall"
      [ NGulf National News]
      "Weather Program Office [NOAA] Weather Modification."
      " Weather and Climate Modification - National Science Foundation [NSF]"
      " NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL OD-14 CUMULUS CLOUDS AND THEIR MODIFICATION
      " S.3383 (94th): National Weather Modification Policy Act Introduced: May 5, 1976
      "Owning the Weather"
      "Project Popeye"
      " Project Cumulus "
      "PROJECT WOODPECKER"
      " Project Lucy"
      " Hurricane and tornado control device "
      "ATMOSPHERIC HEATING AS A RESEARCH TOOL confex"
      "China's radical $168 million weather control system revealed: '
      "China is massively expanding its weather-modification program, saying it will be able to cover half the country in artificial rain and snow by 2025"
      " Greening a Saudi Arabian Desert"
      " China plans to use chemicals to generate rain to protect its grain harvest
      August 21, 2022 "
      " WEATHER MODIFICATION INC"
      'Climate engineering by mimicking natural dust climate control: the iron salt aerosol method'
      " H.R.4586 - Geoengineering Research Evaluation Act of 2017 "
      "Preliminary Experimental Evaluation of Snomax (TM) Snow Inducer, Nucleus Pseudomonas syringae, as an Artificial Ice for Weather Modification" 1989
      "Silica aerogel nanopowder. What geoengineers 'plan' on putting into the atmosphere and environment. "
      " Weather Modification Using Electromagnetic Beams Common Knowledge at Aquiess,Inc"

  • @brianboudignon5669
    @brianboudignon5669 Рік тому +2

    Dear Captain Bob the photos and videos that I have taken are not at all addressed by narrative. I am awake to the truth.

  • @14112ido
    @14112ido 5 років тому +102

    I love that dramatic editing on the cropduster 😂.

    • @ryanparker4996
      @ryanparker4996 2 роки тому +1

      Its not even funny. Crop-Dusters are not the only kind of chemical treatment aircraft that exist. Look up Cloud-Seeding. Its how they make it rain in Dubai. Its been used since the 60s, in Vietnam as a weapon. They also did it at Woodstock '69. All verifiable.

    • @vex693
      @vex693 2 роки тому +3

      @@ryanparker4996 u ok?

    • @ryanparker4996
      @ryanparker4996 2 роки тому

      @@vex693 freedom of information requests exist, kiddo

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +4

      @@ryanparker4996 Cloud seeding doesn’t make it rain. You may want to actually research what cloud seeding is. It takes existing rain systems and attempts to add nucleates to possibly increase rainfall by 10-15 percent, although the efficacy is very questionable. What are your issues with cloud seeding?

    • @ryanparker4996
      @ryanparker4996 2 роки тому

      @@elyjahstark that we werent asked wether or not we wanted to be inhaling and ingesting the shite they spray into the clouds to encourage the rainfall, were we? No

  • @Chuck59ish
    @Chuck59ish 7 років тому +13

    In the older low bypass jet engines like used on the AWACS, the exhaust is black because fuel is used to cool the turbine blades, on the newer high bypass jet engines, the use more air and less fuel so the exhaust is cleaner.

    • @RichardFStripeRendezvous
      @RichardFStripeRendezvous 7 років тому +2

      Yep, watercooled engines

    • @Chuck59ish
      @Chuck59ish 7 років тому +4

      Only earlier aircraft like the AV8B Harrier with the Rolls-Royce F402-RR-408(Mk 107) used water injection to give it more thrust and in the case of the Harrier it used 75 gallons of distilled water. I know in 1986 at the Trenton Air Show at CFB Trenton, Ontario, I helped the Marine ground crew fill the Harrier at the Air Show. The problem was the people in charge wouldn't let them move the Harrier to a concrete ramp, so when the started it on the paved area, it set the oil in the pavement on fire when they applied full, water injected power. Jet engines are designed to use the air moving by the engines to keep the temperature down to around 800 F during flight.

    • @jimmy8959
      @jimmy8959 7 років тому

      Contrail would covering the whole sky..? Using a FLIGHTRADARS app U can see its the same aircraft with the same pilot without landing flying whole day n night that must be alien technology I think.. recently a short video of an A380 spraying thick grey CONTRAIL was caught by another captain flying nearby.

  • @kamrantehran8968
    @kamrantehran8968 9 місяців тому +1

    Good information but the same technology used to kill bugs is used to kill humans and to disrupt photosynthesis.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 9 місяців тому +2

      Interesting hypothesis, but what does it have to do with the 'chemtrail' hoax?

    • @kamrantehran8968
      @kamrantehran8968 9 місяців тому

      @@siouxperb5570 After the assassinated President Kennedy many whistleblowers and insiders pointed the finger to the CIA as the culprit with compelling facts.
      The CIA countered the truth tellers by calling them "conspiracy theorists".
      My parents worked in Iran's intelligence agency Savak in the 70's (established by the CIA).
      Governments often deflect attention from their dirty deeds by calling whistle blowers and populists as hoaxes and conspiracy theorists.
      I'm not trying to argue but just giving you some food for thought.
      I know about cloud seeding, contrails, crop-dusting and fuel dumping, however non of these begin as long white plumes that are sprayed in the form of X throughout our sly. Throughout the day they expand and mushroom and turn our clear skies grey.
      I believe in civil, respectful and thoughtful dialogue, free from CIA mind control.
      Let me remind you that our government lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and illegally invaded Iraq in the name of democracy killed up to one million non combatant Iraqis.
      Look up illegal CIA Operation Ajax and Operation Northwoods.
      You might ask why then are we being sprayed with heavy metals and God knows what else.
      Good question, the world's ruling class want significantly reduce the population. Look up the Georgia Guiding Stones article on a world population of 500 million.
      This is admitted in their own writings. People like Prince Phillip, Henry Kissinger, Bill Gates, Ted Turner and many more have proposed reducing the population. Of course they will be the Lords over the implementation.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 9 місяців тому +1

      @@kamrantehran8968 "I know about cloud seeding, contrails, crop-dusting and fuel dumping, however non of these begin as long white plumes that are sprayed in the form of X throughout our sly"
      None except for contrails, which are solely and entirely the source of the 'chemtrail' hoax. And, of course, contrails are not "sprayed", but just for clarification. But yes, contrails do often end up being long, white plumes behind high altitude aircraft, they very often remain in the sky for many, many hours, they often grow in mass through accretion, and they indeed can muck up the sky into a cloudy haze. And they ABSOLUTELY appear in grid patterns. That is a function of intersecting airways, humidity, and wind. There is no other explanation, when you apply the laws of physics. So the rest of your assertions (conspiracy theories, if you will) really are of no interest to me. The 'chemtrail' hoax is very much in my wheel house, as I've been fascinated (as a lifelong professional pilot) by the people that cling to this hoax and declare that aircraft can perform magic. This is a simple matter of verifiable physics. I've been laughing at people that proclaim this fantasy is true for more than 15 years. When asked for evidence, they can present absolutely NOTHING. They change the subject to false equivalence fallacy, such as cloud seeding (which you mentioned) geoengineering (SAI or SRM) even REALLY tengential subjects like HAARP, NASA lithium dispersals into the ionosphere....really just about anything on the fringe of aviation/atmospherically related to attempt to DESPERATELY get validation to the hoax. Nothing is relevant, except for contrails. They even make up false facts about contrails, such as they don't persist more than a few minutes, they don't form in X or grid patterns, and all sorts of other verifiably false claims. The one insurmountable hurdle that they never, ever under any circumstances try to address is the mass problem. These persistent, spreading, growing contrails that are the sole and entire source of the 'chemtrail' hoax weigh many, many tens, and even hundreds of MILLIONS of pounds, as they span the sky from horizon to horizon. That mass is the sole and entire reason they can be seen from up to 100 miles away. Then you ask them to divide the payload of any aircraft on this planet by the distance from horizon to horizon and that number comes out to far less than 1% of the mass of a contrail, and would obviously never be able to be seen.
      If people would actually investigate the hoax, instead of simply believing what charlatans blindly tell them to, without giving it a moment of critical thought, we wouldn't have this, and likely any other, conspiracy theories. Occam's razor definitely applies to all of these.

    • @Twizzulator2039
      @Twizzulator2039 9 місяців тому

      @@kamrantehran8968 good to know we have some people that know the truth about the world.

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 9 місяців тому

      @@siouxperb5570let’s go Keith!!!

  • @WashtubTimeMachine
    @WashtubTimeMachine 10 місяців тому +2

    Question... How do I get a plethora of bots to follow me too? Is there an option without selling your soul, as well? That option is a pretty much out of the question, for me...

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 10 місяців тому +3

      Dane Wigington sold his soul, and has plenty of sheep following him, and he doesn't seem to mind profiting from simplistic minded people. I've considered it, as it is a really easy way to monetize a channel to make money. If idiots are willing to part with it, who am I to say no? That's the way I see it...

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 10 місяців тому +1

      @@siouxperb5570mick west pooped on your face loser.

  • @skepticalmom2948
    @skepticalmom2948 Рік тому +19

    The most important thing to remember is contrails dissipate because they are water vapor, chemtrails dont, they stick around for days. Explain that.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +3

      Contrails are NOT water vapor. Water vapor is an invisible gas, and cannot be seen. What cannot be seen, cannot visually disappear. Contrails are ice, and will remain in the sky for as long as any other cirrus clouds will under the conditions.
      Or, do you not BELIEVE in clouds?

    • @skepticalmom2948
      @skepticalmom2948 Рік тому

      @@siouxperb5570 , of course I believe in clouds. But clouds are more dense than contrails. Contrails dissipate very fast. They do not stick around for days. And clouds are made up of water vapor, not just ice, water droplets can stick to dust as well. Contrails are transitory because they are smaller amounts made by airplanes. They get moved quicker than clouds.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +1

      @@skepticalmom2948 contrails are aircraft induced cirrus clouds. They are identical in density.
      Why do you wrongly believe contrails must dissipate very fast? Why don't natural cirrus clouds dissipate fast? Contrails will last as long as natural cirrus clouds in a given set of conditions.
      Again, clouds are NOT water vapor. All visible clouds are either solid (ice crystals) or liquid (water droplets). Vapor is an INVISIBLE gas. It cannot be seen. This is a law of physics, so you look very foolish trying to argue against it.
      But perhaps YOU could try explaining which chemical it is you believe can hang in the sky for many hours, growing in mass. Because water is the only one that will do that. But go ahead and defend your assertion.

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 Рік тому +4

      "The most important thing to remember is contrails dissipate because they are water vapor"
      Last time I checked water at temperatures of below freezing point was solid.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Рік тому +3

      @@skepticalmom2948 "Contrails are transitory because they are smaller amounts made by airplanes."
      Your problem is, you don't know what contrails are. Admittedly, it is not explained thoroughly too often.
      Most people live under the impression, they see the water from the engines. Wrong. The engines produce too little water to make a visible track. That's why you don't see any contrails if the air is dry (RH below 70%). Contrails become visible only in ambient air of RH over 70% where the water (and some impurities in the exhaust gasses) triggers a deposition (the opposite of sublimation) process and the supercooled ambient vater vapors snap-freeze. This results into formation of a cirrus cloud (cirrus aviaticus) where only less than 0.1% of the material is the water from the engines. If the RH is really high, the deposition becomes a chain reaction spreading over a wide area. The result is perfectly natural cirrus cloud cover no different at all from any other.
      Dig it?

  • @GhostHostMemories
    @GhostHostMemories 7 років тому +203

    To be "fair" a 'contrail' IS a chem trail. Water is a chemical.. so.... ;-) But honestly, there is NO way that the chemtrail conspiracy (hey chemtrail isn't a word recognized by autocorrect!) could be as large as all the airlines, pilots, mechanics, tech and whatnot and still be "kept secret"

    • @GhostHostMemories
      @GhostHostMemories 7 років тому

      i don't negate that governments as a whole aren't doing it because it's only limited to commercial airlines. there are also cargo only lines, private charters, military etc. thus the last part "everyone" keeping quiet about it remains true. there have been leaks coming out of a smaller sets of people.

    • @CzornyLisek
      @CzornyLisek 7 років тому +1

      There is dumping of things like dry ice and other chemicals to made raining -> so called cloud seeding. It was used for example in Beijing olympics event, all around Bejing planes sprayed chemical from few km so that there would be no rain over olimpic city and to dump all contaminated things in air into sewers.
      But such occasions are very very rare and're monitored very well. Well even number of planes that can do this is very very small.
      In war it is possible to use some (military)planes to do cloud seeding. But generally You don't even need planes to do that and it's also a thing that happens naturaly anyway.

    • @SiebAir
      @SiebAir 7 років тому

      even exhaust gases are chemicals, so...

    • @sonsofthunder915
      @sonsofthunder915 7 років тому +3

      To be fair a contrail is NOT a chemtrail. Wake up------> www.technologyreview.com/s/603974/harvard-scientists-moving-ahead-on-plans-for-atmospheric-geoengineering-experiments/

    • @mgoblue0970
      @mgoblue0970 7 років тому +2

      Water is a "COMPOUND" not a "chemical". You are mistaken.

  • @robertros74
    @robertros74 3 місяці тому

    Zwróćcie uwagę na to że opryski zaczynają się zawsze od wschodu słońca i się przesuwają ku zachodowi żeby przykryć zjawiska towarzyszące wschodowi slonca

  • @Outdoorshuntingshooting
    @Outdoorshuntingshooting 3 місяці тому +7

    Lmfao its moisture in the air. There is a chemical involved, h2o.

    • @donmiller2885
      @donmiller2885 3 місяці тому

      Yeah moisture and chemicals like aluminum. Been proven old news. You are just embarrassing yourself.

  • @sinashaffer714
    @sinashaffer714 4 роки тому +29

    They sprayed chemtrails here up above our house last week. I have pictures to prove it.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому +8

      Yes, let's see them. And no pictures of contrails allowed.

    • @firebird4491
      @firebird4491 4 роки тому +4

      Fucking idiot

    • @collinathomas7
      @collinathomas7 4 роки тому +1

      Same they did it in an x! Combining to chemicals that cant be together in one but did it in the air

    • @firebird4491
      @firebird4491 4 роки тому +2

      @@collinathomas7 You're actually dumb unironically

    • @firebird4491
      @firebird4491 4 роки тому +2

      @@BuddhaofBlackpool Yeah man my dad is gassing me that's a damn shame

  • @TheDkjayjay
    @TheDkjayjay Рік тому +5

    you are forgetting one important thing:
    jet-fuel is basically kerosene - with some additives, depending on at what temperature (flight level) it is ment to be used.
    these additives are added, to make sure that the fuel gets to the engines as a fluid, not as ice lumps.
    but here is the important thing:
    1 kg of burned jet-fuel gives 1.4 kg of water - and that water, when condensing, is the reason for the white trails following a high flying plane.
    how can burning 1 kg of kerosene result in 1.4 kg water?
    here is the answer:
    kerosene:
    formula: C10H22
    molecular weight: 142.3
    combustion: C10H22 + 31 O -> 10 CO2 + 11 H2O
    Molecular weight water (H20): 18
    18x11=198 thus:
    142.3 kg of kerosene gives 198 kg of water
    so burning 1 kg of kerosene gives 1.4 kg water.

    • @TheDkjayjay
      @TheDkjayjay Рік тому +1

      PS:
      modern high bypas turbo engines adds even more condensed water to the white trails.
      the compression of the bypass air around the turbine will, when released to the lower pressure surroundings, also condensate - and showing trails of condensed water.

  • @onefourwhisky
    @onefourwhisky 11 місяців тому +4

    it is time for the July 2 edition of NAME THAT CHEMTRAIL PLANE !!!!
    all you have to do is
    see a plane producing a chemtrail
    cite specifically the time and date you see the plane
    cite specifically the location ... state and city and/or county
    cite specifically the altitude
    cite the flight number and or the registration n-number
    it is so simple a child can do it ... why can't you ???

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 11 місяців тому

      Because as you have been told millions of times, there’s are not commercial airline. These are military operations just like the same planes that chentrailed agent Orange over Korea and Vietnam killing millions of people. Why can’t you get that through the years of millions of postings you have been arguing on?

  • @1776adb
    @1776adb Рік тому +3

    When crops start dying you realize the truth - too late.

    • @Ben-mk9ig
      @Ben-mk9ig Рік тому +4

      Just _when_ will that be? According to most chemtards this all started in the 1990s. If after 30 years the crops are not mysteriously dying, chemtrails must not be very effective, huh?

    • @1776adb
      @1776adb Рік тому

      @@Ben-mk9ig huh

  • @airindiana
    @airindiana 5 років тому +32

    I’m a B747 driver and can say day 1 of B747 ground school was “don’t tell them”. In the FCOM tech manual under the fuel section there’s a paragraph that reads “classified - not really fuel tanks. This aircraft doesn’t need fuel. Runs on unicorn tears. These are chemtrail tanks. For the purposes of discussion hereafter shall be referred to as “fuel tanks””
    Every now and then we fight the airlines over them trying to hammer our terms and conditions. We mention to blow the lid off chemtrails and then blokes in suits and dark glasses start appearing. You see them popping their heads above the rose bushes in the back garden. My advice to you all, buy a really good umbrella.

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 5 років тому +2

      Haha, really funny xD

    • @gentlestudios8483
      @gentlestudios8483 4 роки тому +2

      HA! I knew it!

    • @hobbyhermit66
      @hobbyhermit66 4 роки тому +1

      Leave it up to "B" to design a plane to run on unicorn tears. Imagine the power they could get from crocodile tear engines!

    • @Lawrence330
      @Lawrence330 4 роки тому +4

      Lies!!! You're just a shill for the umbrella companies! Wait...Umbrella Corp?!?!?!!? I KNEW IT!!!!! /s

    • @srira7910
      @srira7910 2 роки тому +1

      Dehydrated Unicorn Tears

  • @RedDelPaPa
    @RedDelPaPa 6 років тому +25

    I'm in my mid 40's. I just wanna know while I was growing up, why I never saw tic-tac-toe streaks in the sky that stretch from horizon to horizon and hang there all day and slowly spread out into a thin milky haze? Didn't start seeing these regularly until somewhere around 1999. And people from many countries still report no such thing in their skies. Clearly this is a relatively new phenomena which explains why many people are now taking notice. I suspect it's coming from an additive in jet fuel that is harmless to the engines, which would also explain why pilots know nothing about it. What the purpose is I don't know. I have heard that it's an attempt to help combat global warming by reflecting a portion of the suns radiation back out into space.

    • @yassassin6425
      @yassassin6425 6 років тому +2

      People are noticing because it has become far more prevalent due to an exponential increase in air traffic and crucially routes flown.
      Coincidentally, 1999 was when the chemtrails conspiracy theory began in earnest through Coast to Coast AM and subsequently spreading across the internet . The conflation with geoengineering is due to those on the coattails of this attempting to vindicate the claims by claiming that research into Stratospheric Aerosol Injection is confirmation of chemtrails. To clarify, the chemtrail hoax that this video is debunking is the claim that large white plumes in the wake of commercial aircraft that the rational recognise as contrails are evidence of chemical spraying. If SAI was underway this would be at double the altitude and would be invisible to the ground based observer. It certainly wouldn't resemble a large white cloud out of the rear of a commercial aircraft.

    • @njsmeets66
      @njsmeets66 2 роки тому

      This is geo-engineering
      Part of depopulation agenda

    • @vikinglife6316
      @vikinglife6316 2 роки тому +5

      Because its chemicals. My step father works as a lead mechanic for Lockheed and Martin in Lexington KY he even knows what they are spraying and yes you are correct Im older than you and these tic tac toe never existed. Conttrails dont stay up there for hours spreading out across the sky.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +1

      @@vikinglife6316 Wow! Then it will be easy for you to provide evidence of what is being sprayed according to you! Let’s hear it!
      Your claim that these tic tac toe patterns never existed is contradicted by numerous pictures and videos dating back decades. Why do you believe contrails can’t persist? Did the laws of physics change? Or do clouds not exist in your reality?

    • @rochey07
      @rochey07 2 роки тому

      @@vikinglife6316 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @moparmadman1134
    @moparmadman1134 5 місяців тому +1

    Why do these trails spread across the sky and why do they stop and start

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 5 місяців тому +3

      Browse thru the comments here. Explained about a hundred times. Applicable to just about any other question on this subject you may have.

    • @onefourwhisky
      @onefourwhisky 5 місяців тому +3

      Why do clouds spread across the sky and why do they stop and start

    • @ilonagunszebn2674
      @ilonagunszebn2674 5 місяців тому

      @@curiouscat8457 bla bla

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 5 місяців тому +1

      @@ilonagunszebn2674 "bla bla"
      Response as intelligent as expected.

  • @theartofts
    @theartofts 2 місяці тому

    I watched three planes work in unison one hot summer day. By the end of the day there was a checkerboard in the sky above the city. I watched them fly south in a tight triangle formation. The planed being the same size from my perspective. The two outer planes had ‘trails’ behind them going back at least 50 kms. The lead plane only had a contrail that dissipated quickly. There were also two black helicopters flying into and then out of the ‘trails’ …… so maybe you’re a pilot and you know some things but you don’t know anything about chemtrails. The only people that do are the scientists doing the research.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 2 місяці тому +2

      By saying "The planed being the same size from my perspective." you are implying they were flying at the same altitude. Do you know what models they were? Just to make you realize how false your conclusion may be: The length of A380 fuselage is 73 m, B737-300 is 33 m, B787 is 63 m, DC10 55 m etc. Where do you go from here?
      The checkboard pattern has been explained many times. Look up "contrails science contrail simulator".
      To top the display of your ignorance you are talking about "helicopters flying into and then out of the ‘trails’". The cruising altitude of large jets is over 30,000 ft. The operational ceiling of most helicopters is about 15,000 ft. Look up "perspective".

    • @Ben-mk9ig
      @Ben-mk9ig 2 місяці тому +1

      There are *_no_* scientists doing research on chemtrails because they are all educated enough to know they do not exist, *_Trevor._*

  • @jean-marczimmer2544
    @jean-marczimmer2544 5 років тому +59

    There are also firefighter jets that drop chemicals to fight forest fires.

    • @nebtheweb8885
      @nebtheweb8885 4 роки тому +2

      Anything that would qualify as spraying actual chemicals (chemtrails) would be doing so at low altitudes. NOT 7 miles up. Therefore, Contrails are not chemtrails.

  • @Chimney_Swift
    @Chimney_Swift 5 років тому +81

    wait water is a chemical
    firefighting craft drop chemicals

    • @andresaveiro2641
      @andresaveiro2641 5 років тому +1

      HOLY SHIT!!!!

    • @mawage666
      @mawage666 5 років тому +5

      Water? You mean like out the toilet?

    • @B30smo
      @B30smo 4 роки тому +1

      These guys are paid to lie. Care to explain why they are drawing satanic pentagrams and crosses with chemtrails over christian families ? If you do your research you'll understand that they're all in on it and that the web of corruption is huge and involves scientists, politicians, media, military, intelligence agencies, finance, multinationals and the vatican. Look up ted gunderson. Many good men have died for exposing the truth and this bozo is staining their memories with his satanic lies. He's either a complete brainwashed fool or paid to lie. Alister crowley worshipped the devil and admitted to sacrificing 150 children a year without ever facing prosecution. Do not be fooled. Albert Pike, Alister Crowley and so on. They try to make you sound crazy and silence you if you tell the truth about them. Spirit cooking (you'll find the same pentagrams there along with some 666s), GeorGia Guidestones (6eor6ia 6uidestones), pizzagate, their handsigns. Even the CIA admits some of it on their online library. The truth is in front of your eyes. The role of government, police, army and intelligence agency is to protect its people and its nation. They have been hijacked from their functions and tricked into this satanic religion which is all about lies, theft, corruption and murder. You are financing your own genocide and listening to the sweet lies of one of their puppets rather than facing the harsh truth. That they lie and your government no longer serves your interests but their own. Most people are too scared to tell the truth, afraid to die or afraid of retaliation and losing their reputation, wealth and status. We are ruled by cowards, criminals who have sold their souls to the devil. They do not serve their function anymore but destroy their countries and murder their populations for profit. They are committing high treason and one day they will face justice. See you in hell.

    • @jeramiet154
      @jeramiet154 4 роки тому +9

      Dihydrogen monoxide is some dangerous stuff. SCARY CHEMICALS... ...BOO!

    • @jeramiet154
      @jeramiet154 4 роки тому

      @@B30smo all of this minus the crazy chemtrails stuff and religious bullshit is actually pretty accurate.

  • @janne-mans8295
    @janne-mans8295 5 місяців тому +1

    If there is a strong tailwind in a certain corridor track, I can image a pilot taking the throttle back to save fuel consumption.
    This may appear as if the contrail suddenly has stopped, whereas the circumstances allow for such behavior, like a sailboat or bird.
    Then after a while the throttle is gradually increased and the contrails become visible again

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 5 місяців тому +3

      While technically possible, the vast majority of intermittent contrails are results of aircraft flying thru alternative patches of dry and humid air without any changes in thrust setting.
      Still, one of the rare sparks of intelligence in this comments section. 🙂

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@curiouscat8457Hi,
      Genuine question here : would there be any legit reason to do so? Could a voluntary total interruption of fuel injection happen? Would there be risks?

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 5 місяців тому +2

      @@victorvastel8028 Legit reasons to adjust thrust are there all the time. In a normal cruising mode however, these adjustments are usually small, and autopilot takes the care of them. They are not likely to make the difference between contrail being formed or not. It does can happen though.
      Powering down to idle is also normal, and it normally takes place only while initiating descent to a lower FL or landing. It is, obviously, likely to stop contrail forming but it happens much less frequently than the mentioned before changes in ambient atmospheric conditions.
      "Total interruption of fuel supply" (shutting down the engine) however is always a part of some emergency procedure and nobody wants to do it - too much paperwork afterwards.🙂

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 5 місяців тому +1

      @@curiouscat8457 Thanks cap!

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 5 місяців тому

      @@victorvastel8028you are crap. Eat more🌭🌭🌭🌭 sausage gobbler

  • @onefourwhisky
    @onefourwhisky 11 місяців тому +3

    The July 1, 2023 edition of NAME THAT CHEMTRAIL PLANE !!!!
    It's the new game where chemtrail believers demonstrate what they know about the planes they see producing chemtrails ... in order to play all you have to do is
    A) be a chemtrail believer
    B) see a plane producing a chemtrail
    C) cite specifically the time and date you see the plane
    D) cite specifically the location ... state and city and/or county
    E) cite specifically the altitude
    AND MOST IMPORTANT
    F) cite the flight number and or the registration n-number
    I am sure it will be great fun to see how much chemtrail believers know about the planes
    PS ... this is going to be a daily post every day of July ... so if you don't see a chemtrail plane today , there is always tomorrow 😏

  • @lustalgia...
    @lustalgia... 4 роки тому +44

    military
    not your plane bud

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому +6

      Military aircraft are no more capable of defying the laws of physics than a civilian aircraft.

    • @amirmokrane366
      @amirmokrane366 3 роки тому +2

      If you are talking about the colourful smoke from jets, those are probably for the purposes of the parade

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 3 роки тому +3

      @Bradley Harrington Shocking! So you saw contrail persistence right before a cold front moved over. Weird, it’s almost like the persistent contrails are indicative of advancing cold fronts which bring in increased moisture.

    • @noobninja3596
      @noobninja3596 3 роки тому

      @Bradley Harrington dude you might be living in busy airspace, and the temp lowered because the temp was lower in the atmosphere way above before, causing contrails

    • @noobninja3596
      @noobninja3596 3 роки тому +1

      @Bradley Harrington mate it might seem suspicious but loading chemicals in a plane is an extremely big risk and its impossible to put that much payload

  • @lowquality9232
    @lowquality9232 6 років тому +10

    even though i dont believe this, its stupid to think theyd inform the pilots about this and think they wouldnt tell anyone

    • @zazuch
      @zazuch 6 років тому +2

      zero chan again do you realize even if they left the pilots ignorant how many grounds crew would wonder why there is a secret tanker that adds a special liquid to the plane? If you say it's not added to the planes on the ground but in the fuel. Again the question begs do you realize how many refineries there are that would have to have either government agents there or the refineries be in on it? To properly coat the world via commercial jet liners there would be so many people in on it that they couldn't keep it a secret.

    • @bobingalls4643
      @bobingalls4643 3 роки тому +1

      There are people in the airforce who load the canisters onto the planes who know about this. But they are not talking according to one female whistleblower.

    • @centralintelligenceagency9003
      @centralintelligenceagency9003 2 роки тому +2

      300000 Commercial pilots worldwide and 300000 A&P mechanics in the USA alone, and not at least a handful of whistleblowers?
      Yeah. Right.

  • @larrybaker5316
    @larrybaker5316 8 місяців тому +4

    they were flying over our house one day creating chemtrails, then the very next day our tomatoes on the vines in my backyard were bigger than bowling balls. true story! also the bees were bigger than watermelons another true story. P.S. I installed a off-low-high chemical button on my truck dashboard, you can pick 1 up at any aircraft manufacturing plant, sometimes you can get a "2nd" with only slight blemishes on it for about 1/2 the price.

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 8 місяців тому +3

      Damn. LSD spreading confirmed after all. :)

    • @larrybaker5316
      @larrybaker5316 8 місяців тому +3

      thanks ! I can also distribute the covid vax out of my tailpipe@@victorvastel8028

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 8 місяців тому

      @@victorvastel8028damn, rejects are spreading under the military online personality program

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 8 місяців тому +4

      Don't say that. These fools will believe you!

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 8 місяців тому

      @@oscarb9139 they only thing believed is that you are the military online personality program losers. You are on every thread all day every day. I suppose you took the vax and the booster and the secondary booster.

  • @BDRHDG
    @BDRHDG 9 місяців тому

    THEN WHY DO I SEE FOR PLANES FLYING OPPOSITE OF ONE ANOTHER AND THEN CIRCLING AGAIN IN THE SAME AREA AND FLYING OPPOSITE AGAIN LEAVING LOWE'S CAMP TRAILS COME ON

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 9 місяців тому +2

      Sort up first your keyboard being stuck in CAPS before learning more complicated things like aviation holding patterns.

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 9 місяців тому

      @@curiouscat8457 ua-cam.com/video/dJEpaZTR7vo/v-deo.htmlsi=iD3NhRKpoCzzAdCg

  • @horizob
    @horizob 7 років тому +159

    Hi captain Joe! I am glad you made a good video to help dispel this conspiracy theory. However, as your videos have a very high technical accuracy standard, I wish to add some mentions to the info in this video:
    1. The first category you show is not exactly a wingtip vortex, it is a vortex generated at the end of the flap on the B734, based on the pressure difference, and hence the lift differential, between the inboard wing with flaps deployed and the outboard wing that has ailerons. Due to the high speed and low static pressure inside the very powerful vortex, the air can drop under the dew point and condense, thus the vortex core becomes visible. Also, there is condensation above the wing.
    2. You correctly identify contrails, the trails due to condensation, but they only in small part due to the heating of the air. The combustion of jet fuel, any hydrocarbon fuel for that matter, breaks down hydrogen and carbon bonds through oxidation with atmospheric oxygen to release CO2 (or CO, carbon monoxide if there is not enough oxygen) and H2O, water vapour. It is this water vapour, released in very high quantities, that condenses. Basically you get small clouds. Their formation is temperature dependent, I have seen videos of airliners in Siberia in winter leaving contrails as they take off from the airport at -40°C in very dry air
    3. You are mostly correct about the E-3A AWACS exhaust, it is engine smoke. Early turbojets and turbofans have combustion chambers with uneven distributions of air, fuel and temperature, so areas appear where combustion is incomplete, forming soot particles (Ruß auf Deutsch). Also, high temperatures in combustion chambers of jet engines and certain diesel engines cause atmospheric nitrogen to bond with oxygen, forming NO and NO2, so called NOX. It is an extra source of pollution and were the topic of the Volkswagen pollution scandal in the USA.
    4. I would have liked you to underscore the economic nonsense that a massive spraying campaign using airliners would have. I mean weight is a very important issue. Every passenger of a low cost airline knows that. Soooo....how anyone can afford to take a couple of extra tons of spraying chemicals onto their A320 is nonsense. Aircraft contrails do contribute to a cooling phenomenon called global dimming, but that helps diminish the effects of the greenhouse gasses. But that is a side-effect, not a main cause.
    Sorry for the long post, but I really like this channel and I want to contribute to increasing to the technical and scientific accuracy of the content. Keep up the good work and see you around. If you fly a 05 approach or 23 take-off at EDDH, you fly over my house!
    Best regards!

    • @theopinionisthighqualityopinio
      @theopinionisthighqualityopinio 6 років тому +2

      Horatiu Goanta Are you f ing kidding?? I suppose you think we were all born yesterday, along with you, right?

    • @raptor2265
      @raptor2265 6 років тому +7

      Apparently so, since you can't understand that there are NO SUCH THINGS AS CHEMTRAILS!
      Firstly, WHY DO IT?! Poisoning us? Birth control? Mind control? You nutters never give a solid answer.
      Secondly, since they are flying at 20-30 thousand feet, by the time the particles would reach the ground, no matter HOW potent it is, would be rendered harmless because it would dissipate to the point were it couldn't even be detected.

    • @meec3030
      @meec3030 6 років тому

      Raptor22 ,

    • @raptor2265
      @raptor2265 6 років тому +9

      .... I... You know what? Fuck it.
      If someone is going to call me an evil, genocidal psychopath for simply explaining how chemtrails do not exist, then they will never change.

    • @JohnSmith-xs4fq
      @JohnSmith-xs4fq 6 років тому

      Horatiu Goanta are you a pilot no is he yes

  • @bluefluke7585
    @bluefluke7585 4 роки тому +22

    Okay, so what airlines are doing those checkerboard pattern departures or landings?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому +1

      All of them, but not on departure or landing.

    • @pauliamsocool
      @pauliamsocool 3 роки тому +2

      @@siouxperb5570 Perth, West Australia is only departures or landings. Nobody flys over Perth on the way to somewhere else. It's too remote. So why do we have constant trails?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 3 роки тому +5

      @@pauliamsocool "Perth, West Australia is only departures or landings. Nobody flys over Perth on the way to somewhere else. It's too remote."
      Really? Then why all the high altitude airways?
      skyvector.com/
      AWFUL lot of published high altitude airways for a place that only has departures, and arrivals. Sort of makes the ICAO look pretty foolish for publishing them, huh? Someone ought to tell them NO ONE flies OVER Perth on the way to anywhere else, and to amend their charts accordingly......

    • @tracyfunk3928
      @tracyfunk3928 3 роки тому

      @@pauliamsocool The same thing in the US. Planes don't fly directly west of Cali, unless they are headed mostly North or South. WHY? Because it takes too much fuel to go anywhere in that direction. Planes simply can't carry the weight. Yet there are still CHEMtrails West of SF.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 3 роки тому +3

      @@tracyfunk3928 Flights going from LAX to Asia always head up over Anchorage. It’s called a great circle route and is influenced by ETOPs restrictions. That’s why there are CONTRAILS west of SF.

  • @iankimbrell6594
    @iankimbrell6594 2 місяці тому

    Hey just because you aren’t doing doesn’t meant he government isn’t DARPA DOD. It does happen

  • @Taitienlong
    @Taitienlong 8 місяців тому +1

    Je vais traduire : Ne vous inquiétez pas tout va bien ! C’est normal ces traînées …je suis pilote d’avion je sais de quoi je parle…. Dormez bien sur vos deux oreilles et faites nous confiance…confiance…. Confiance

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 8 місяців тому

      Bonsoir,
      Vous êtes libre de vérifier par vous-même.

    • @Taitienlong
      @Taitienlong 8 місяців тому +1

      C’était juste de l’humour face aux assertions de « captain Joe » hypnose collective circulez il y a rien à voir c’est juste de la vapeur d’eau où captain Joe vapote dans son avion !

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 8 місяців тому +1

      @@Taitienlong Au temps pour moi. Vive la loi de Poe.

    • @elyjahstark7549
      @elyjahstark7549 8 місяців тому

      @@victorvastel8028long love Agent Orange factual Chemtrails. Hello, no one is believing anything you say.

  • @Bilal-gx8yb
    @Bilal-gx8yb 3 роки тому +37

    Chemtrails over the country club

    • @mikeharris8960
      @mikeharris8960 3 роки тому +1

      Who are you.....exhaust is exhaust. Idiot

    • @dennistheonlysolution5330
      @dennistheonlysolution5330 3 роки тому

      There's videos of planes with huge tanks filled n tipped in to sky

    • @kevinkovarik1330
      @kevinkovarik1330 3 роки тому

      I have personally seen over 300 government documents from Congress, CIA , I have seen international Global governence reports , I have seen patents for this technology Solar Radiation Management or Stratospheric Aerosol Injection. Past CIA director Brennan and Obama's chief science administrator have stated on record that Solar Radiation Management and Stratospheric Aerosol Injection have both gotten there interest in what they can use to mitigate Global Warming. Listen to David Kieth lead Geoengineer from Harvard or Ken Caldier from Stanford talk about what Solar Radiation Management will look like if we choose to do it. It is exactly what is happening now in our skies. Recently geoengineeringwatch.org went up in a plane just like NOAA uses to get tests from very high altitude 40,000 feet of what is in these so called persistent contrails. The results are off the charts of Aluminum, Barium and Strontium and other things . This is exactly what the geoengineers say that they will use. I've seen blood samples from special labs that look for nanoparticles same thing. Soil samples Rain Water and snow samples. If this was a court of law the people responsible would be found guilty. Here's a question, why do employees of NOAA and National Weather Service have to sign federal gag orders. Because they are hiding something about what is going on about the climate.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 3 роки тому +2

      @@kevinkovarik1330 “I have personally seen over 300 government documents” .... provide just 1 relevant to any visible Chemtrails in the sky.
      “I have seen patents for this technology solar radiation management and stratospheric aerosol injection” ... because both of those are real fields of research. They just have nothing to do with any visible trails in the sky and are not currently being deployed due to a number of geopolitical, physical, and economical limitations.
      “CIA director John Brennan” Again referring to SRM and SAI in the future tense and the potential geopolitical ramifications such a program would have.
      “Listen to David Keith or Ken Caldeir talk about SRM” ... because they are the lead researchers. Still nothing to do with any currently visible trails in the sky.
      “What SRM will look like if we choose to do it” ... again future tense and you can listen to them talking about why it wouldn’t leave persistent trails in the sky that have the opposite effect of what is desired.
      “It is exactly what is happening now in our skies” ... except it’s not. The proposal thus far is to use sulfur compounds that are smaller than the visible wavelength of light (you wouldn’t see them) released from 65k feet (no plane can carry a payload that high) between the latitudes of 30 north and 30 south to utilize wind circulation currents that would create the max effect of reflecting some wavelengths of the sun and then allow for trapped wavelengths to escape. Nothing to do with clustered visible trails randomly arrayed around the globe behind airplanes, mostly commercial.
      “Recently “Dane Wigington” went up in a plane just like NOAA uses to get tests from very high altitude.....The results are off the charts of aluminum barium and strontium”.... he hasn’t released his results yet. He keeps delaying because the minute he does he knows he will be exposed for a fraud again. He’s been advertising his film like crazy for months now and it never seems to come out. He just keeps asking for more donations. Weird, almost like he’s a proven con artist. If you have his results, you’re more than welcome to post them along with his sampling methodology.
      “This is exactly what the geoengineers say they will use” ... except, again, no it’s not. They are researching sulfur compounds like sulfur dioxide and sulfuric acid, similar to volcanic eruptions, which have a similar impact. Barium, strontium, and aluminum violently react with oxygen in various colors, which is why they are used in fireworks.
      “I’ve seen blood samples” the ones from Arizona that all had normal levels? Some were slightly elevated and many were below normal?
      “Soil samples rain water and snow samples” ... like the ones from Mount Shasta where they tested snow in July that was covered in dust and smoke from the nearby wildfire? Or the mud sample compared to drinking water? Or the rain water where they claim there should be no elements measured, forgetting that dust is 8 percent aluminum in average and acts as nucleation for rain drops and gets absorbed by the rain drops as they fall? Or the air sample tests where they forgot to factor back in the volume of air and only measured the particulate ratio in the dust? All of the samples show normal levels for what are being tested once you find out what was actually being tested and ignore the deceptive limits they compare them to that are irrelevant to what is being sampled.
      “If there was a court of law they would be found guilty” ... that was already tried multiple times. They were laughed out of court for not having any evidence. That’s generally what happens when you try to present a smoke screen to scientifically literate individuals who critically think through information instead of just gullibly believing it.
      “Why do employees of NOAA and NWS have to sign federal gag orders” ... they don’t in any relevant way to trails in the sky. They have to do with collective bargaining between the union and early release of reports. Just another smoke screen by Dane.
      “Because they are hiding something about what is going on with the climate” ... no because they are protecting the integrity of their reports until they have been thoroughly reviewed.

    • @danieldoneski9666
      @danieldoneski9666 3 роки тому

      Its illegal to alter the environment but globalists still doing it

  • @pratikshanimbalkar8997
    @pratikshanimbalkar8997 3 роки тому +28

    I like the ending 😂😂😂

    • @randyman1739
      @randyman1739 3 роки тому

      Ye he he...laughing at us in their gay way. 😃

  • @igrant
    @igrant 11 місяців тому +6

    I’m literally speechless at this comment section. Stay in school guys.

    • @karlokunce3148
      @karlokunce3148 6 місяців тому

      Go wear a mask and keep the social distance you muppet😂

  • @connievanscyoc6459
    @connievanscyoc6459 Місяць тому +1

    So how is it you watch two pass over close enough to each other one dissipates quickly while the other does not . also strange the mass back and forth criss cross pattern every time it just lingers

    • @Ben-mk9ig
      @Ben-mk9ig Місяць тому +4

      There are plenty of websites that explain contrail formation and persistence. If you were truly curious you would have availed yourself of them. However, you've already made up your mind that they are chemtrails and thus pose the questions as challenges.