What are CHEMTRAILS? Proving they EXIST by "CAPTAIN" Joe

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40 тис.

  • @rafaelcadena44
    @rafaelcadena44 4 роки тому +661

    Had a question that I noticed you didn't cover. Why is it that in some instances these trail's literally dissipate after a while and other's do not, they literally linger all day and form to what look's like clouds eventually? I'm not denying anything you stated. I'm simply asking a question in wanting to learn. Thank you in advance...

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому +99

      In conditions of higher humidity, it will take longer for contrails to dissipate. In high volumes of air traffic, this will cause the trails to form faster than they can dissipate, creating the cloud cover you've described.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 4 роки тому +8

      If what you are saying is true, you are an unique specimen on this page :-).
      contrailscience.com/how-long-do-contrails-last/

    • @thomasfink2385
      @thomasfink2385 3 роки тому +18

      @@siouxperb5570 Exactly.

    • @thomasfink2385
      @thomasfink2385 3 роки тому +42

      @@ryanmaines6290 Your statement does not fit to the one above, which has been answered - maybe your attention span is too short.
      Back to the facts: I know that for longer than you live.
      They used silver-iodide for the first experiments as condensation kernels - to generate rain and reduce the gravity of hurricanes in assigned missions. But that is costly and legally problematic and was therefore abandoned.
      The issue of this posting is the expectation that this is done on civilian passenger aircraft èn masse. And that is not the case as Captain Joe explains.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 3 роки тому +20

      @@ryanmaines6290 “it’s public information they are spraying heavy metals aluminum oxide, strontium, and barium” …. Is it now? Then you’ll have no problem finding evidence for those claims. Off you go

  • @totttrax
    @totttrax Рік тому +445

    Say what you want my man I watch them paint the sky every morning

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Рік тому +40

      Get yourself a job, that will fix it.

    • @totttrax
      @totttrax Рік тому +1

      @@curiouscat8457 I see while it on break at MY JOB u scumbag p.o.s GET A LIFE JERKOFF

    • @totttrax
      @totttrax Рік тому +1

      @@curiouscat8457 worthless waste of air

    • @extraterrestre2661
      @extraterrestre2661 9 місяців тому +1

      ​@@curiouscat8457 Stupid humans....... So the government can do whatever it wants and you just don't care "Blah blah you need a job" and that's why the government does what it wants behind the scenes without anyone knowing and they laugh how stupid are we..... We should revolt and demand answers but you just don't want to know and prefer to continue being deceived and live your pathetic lives

    • @sk_tana
      @sk_tana 9 місяців тому

      @@curiouscat8457Get yourself a brain that functions properly.

  • @TheNathanielWoods
    @TheNathanielWoods 3 роки тому +279

    He forgot to add his sponsor of the video (the chemical -elite behind the spraying of the sky’s who want to deflect, deny, and confuse what people already know is true)

    • @srira7910
      @srira7910 3 роки тому +2

      Bullshit

    • @g-sher792
      @g-sher792 3 роки тому

      Facts !!! Fuck all goverments!! You cowards need to wake up !!! Your live stock!! Your here to be a slave and be slaughtered in the end !! Pls wake up my brothers and sisters don't eat the grass and be there sheep !!!

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 2 роки тому +7

      @@g-sher792 Your should be you’re, and livestock is one word. This is an example of being poorly educated and is probably why you fall for this tripe.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 2 роки тому

      @Mystic Truth You are random.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 2 роки тому

      @Mystic Truth Your comment.

  • @MG2577
    @MG2577 9 місяців тому +38

    So when I walk in the cold and leave a contrail....it should hang out behind me for hours?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 9 місяців тому +8

      If you’re exhausting enough water to saturate the air and it’s colder than negative 40 degrees, yeah. I doubt that’s the case though.

    • @brettelmerelmer3061
      @brettelmerelmer3061 9 місяців тому +2

      Under proper atmospheric conditions (temperature, pressure, and humidity), yes.

    • @tedhansen3846
      @tedhansen3846 5 місяців тому

      😄👏

    • @MG2577
      @MG2577 5 місяців тому +1

      Tennessee banned geo engineering in the state. Starting July 1st.

    • @homelessalcoholic2716
      @homelessalcoholic2716 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@MG2577What do you think Geo means?

  • @__sno__3820
    @__sno__3820 6 років тому +908

    They're putting chemicals in the water to turn the freaking frogs gay

    • @Lc-bq3hy
      @Lc-bq3hy 5 років тому +19

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @GGg-ug3jr
      @GGg-ug3jr 5 років тому +64

      Yeah it's called atrazine. Look it up

    • @oceandrew
      @oceandrew 5 років тому +9

      @@chaunceythegardener4753 Frogs can vote? Damn, you trumptards take your conspiracy theories to whole new levels.

    • @josedominguez5187
      @josedominguez5187 5 років тому +1

      Lol im sorry but this comment was so random!!

    • @oceandrew
      @oceandrew 5 років тому +3

      @@chaunceythegardener4753
      And then there's this guy (​ chauncey the gardener ) ... what a spectacle of hatred and putrid corruption. Ugh, the stench of him.

  • @dazgodbold
    @dazgodbold 5 років тому +491

    Once I get my pilot's licence I'm going to fly into one and scoop some up for a lab test.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 5 років тому +73

      I have been begging conspiracy nutjobs to do this for years. None will ever do so, because they know it will destroy their hoax forever. There have been countless in-situ studies on persistent contrails, but not a single one ever done on a 'chemtrail'. Gee, wonder why?

    • @Sterlingjob
      @Sterlingjob 5 років тому +26

      Give me your address and I will send you a fuel sample from LHR

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 5 років тому +11

      Nutjob. They occur at very high altitudes. Your pilot certificate will not get you into a plane that can get to that altitude.

    • @rickstark85
      @rickstark85 5 років тому +11

      @@oscarb9139 pretty sure it was a joke...

    • @AV4Life
      @AV4Life 4 роки тому +7

      Contrails usually form at about 26,000ft and above. So good luck

  • @jaywoods8393
    @jaywoods8393 Рік тому +208

    They do this a lot here in the uk on nice clear days. They make like criss cross patterns of this fake cloud and it spreads out as it drops down very slowly .

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +14

      Yep, that's contrails. It is what it is.

    • @yassassin6425
      @yassassin6425 Рік тому +2

      @elyjahstark7549
      “forecast for today, contrails long and thin. They will expand by mid day to form overcast skies.”
      Remember when you used to incessantly troll that exact sentence on multiple videos on your Keith Seigel account? I do.
      And your point about stupid MFER was?

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 Рік тому +2

      @@yassassin6425 "And your point about stupid MFER was?"
      I guess it is his signature and stands for: multiple failures, errors, rubbish.

    • @clydet6547
      @clydet6547 9 місяців тому

      Y'all. They outright lied to you with, "safe and effective", & "stay home, save lives". They outright lied to you when all the local news stations repeated the same bulls*it story of "manufacturer defect" with the purple/blue blacklight streetlamps all over the country and in fact the world which they installed on extreme fast-track at the same time as the 5G (Twisted Luck Truth channel shows the 5G RF nodes set-up on top of these advanced tech blacklight streetlamps). These news stations all spread the same lie about "manufacturer defect" whilst claiming it would cost no one any tax payer dollars and that the manufacturer would replace these lights at no cost. Not a SINGLE STREETLAMP has been replaced these 2 years. NOT ONE. And they are STILL SETTING UP THESE LIGHTS, ESPECIALLY AT HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS AND BANKS.

    • @kurtbradwill
      @kurtbradwill 9 місяців тому +13

      They do it on not so nice days too, you just don't see it

  • @joedrock2
    @joedrock2 9 місяців тому +6

    Contrails were rare and more high altitude in the 80s. These things stay, sink, and spread out in the sky. Contrails disappear as theyre being made, we could see them getting shorter

    • @Ben-mk9ig
      @Ben-mk9ig 9 місяців тому +3

      _"Contrails disappear as theyre being made"_
      Who says? You? You cannot define reality by fabricating your own definitions. Contrails, just like any other cloud, persist as long as the ambient relative humidity allows.

    • @bigmac5859
      @bigmac5859 6 місяців тому

      Weren't it Concorde back then and not jets

  • @LazyMcCrazy
    @LazyMcCrazy 7 років тому +2366

    You'll never stop me from wearing my tin foil hat!

    • @Alilretard1
      @Alilretard1 7 років тому +52

      But a soup pot provides a much more secure location to hide your brain. Can't believe some of you guys think tin foil is sufficient protection.

    • @MichaelShelleysmi
      @MichaelShelleysmi 7 років тому +12

      Your profile picture fits perfectly with that sentence.

    • @jknalgon3549
      @jknalgon3549 7 років тому +12

      I think a nice colander would be better. The metal part would stop incoming information while the little holes would allow vapors to escape.

    • @Alilretard1
      @Alilretard1 7 років тому +12

      A friend of mine showed up wearing a like a pirate eye patch. I asked him how how injured his eye and he flipped it up to reveal a inner tinfoil lining of the eye patch. He said it was to keep out the frequencies that had been bothering him for awhile.

    • @tin2001
      @tin2001 7 років тому +8

      J K Nalgon
      Colanders are no good. The holes will let the tiny brain fall out.

  • @tomasjanik7590
    @tomasjanik7590 5 років тому +321

    Why those contrails sometimes disappear really quickly behind the plane and sometimes they stay on the sky the whole day?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 5 років тому +88

      Tomas Janik because of relative humidity. Think of the air like a towel. If the towel is dry it can absorb more moisture. Contrails that form in dry conditions quickly sublimate back into water vapor because the air can hold it. Now use a soaking wet towel. How well does it absorb extra moisture? Not very well because the towel is saturated. The same goes for contrails that form in humid air conditions. They persist as ice crystals until the ambient air can “absorb” the sublimated water vapor.

    • @tomasjanik7590
      @tomasjanik7590 5 років тому +34

      @@elyjahstark Thank you very much for this great answer. This is exactly what I needed.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 5 років тому +12

      Tomas Janik any time. Great question.

    • @calebreasons
      @calebreasons 4 роки тому +3

      Humidity

    • @stahlah9036
      @stahlah9036 4 роки тому +19

      Tomas Janik bc some of the lines are just water vapor , while others have added chemical compounds for different reasons. That’s why two planes with same engines at same cooorsinates , same day and time can have chemtrails , and the other nothing..

  • @dajmos6969
    @dajmos6969 4 роки тому +284

    But why the trails are sometimes dissappearing after a while and sometimes falls down slowly making one huge transcendent clouds?

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 4 роки тому +18

      Why don't you follow the comments here scrolling down a bit to find out?

    • @lukam8815
      @lukam8815 4 роки тому +39

      because sometimes the air is soo humid that it goes wayy down and thus the "chemtrail" falls down and disperses

    • @InanisNihil
      @InanisNihil 4 роки тому +45

      note ww2.. its was KNOWN.. and usa bombers and fighter where told the average hieght to expect these trails.. thus told to fly lower to avoid leaving trail to not be a visible to the germans and shoot down as easy...
      humans have a bad habit of MAKING UP SHIT for the sake of NEEDING TO HAVE AN ANSWER no matter how wrong it is... rather then just admit they dont know let alone accept the science that doesnt fit what they WANT TO BELIEVE...
      its why religion exist..
      gods literally exist for the same reason these conspiracies exist..
      PEOPLE DONT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE or how to explain it.. so they then CLAIM its this or that.. which is silly... if u dont know what it is then how can u say its this thing or that thin..?!
      basically "i dont know therefore god" butt thats silly.. cause YOU DONT KNOW so how u KNOW its god..?!!?!?!?
      humans - oh my god.. what are those lines coming from planes.. i dont... therefore it must be some evil plan by the elites.. 🤦‍♀️

    • @begit1234
      @begit1234 4 роки тому +26

      Fruity Damian, Ignore the paid shills, Geoengineering watch is a good place to start learning about geoengineering/chemtrails
      www.geoengineeringwatch.org/category/aircraft-spraying-videos/
      I don't respond to paid shills, but they will respond to this post because they are doing their job.

    • @ereder1476
      @ereder1476 4 роки тому +3

      Because you have a hero in your neighbourhood spraying windex to fight against chemtrails ua-cam.com/video/d0Jw4liXKBY/v-deo.html

  • @dogs12347
    @dogs12347 7 років тому +500

    So these airliners are permitted to pollute our skies over our countries with dihydrogen-monoxide.

    • @turbocompound
      @turbocompound 7 років тому +24

      Stephen Molloy Or Oxidan, Dihydrogenether, Mon(o)oxan, Hydrogenhydroxid, Hydroxylacid....👻👻😎👍😷😷....oh, my godness....

    • @jdrake33
      @jdrake33 7 років тому +26

      Stephen Molloy
      Darn dihydrogen monoxide messing everything up!

    • @adeebighani3976
      @adeebighani3976 7 років тому +19

      Stephen Molloy dihydrogen monoxide is water...

    • @Draylogic
      @Draylogic 7 років тому +48

      +Adeeb Ighani your a fucking idiot

    • @fancypants5730
      @fancypants5730 7 років тому +15

      this pretend "captain" is paid to confuse you. Commercial planes all have COMTRAILS that's water vapor. CHEMTRAILS is done with independent contractors spraying . There are several companies doing this and for different reasons of exploration. NEVER let anyone confuse you between normal and safe contrails, coming from commercial planes from Chemtrails. look up geoengineering if you are really serious about the truth

  • @Slacking02
    @Slacking02 Рік тому +92

    Operation LAC (Large Area Coverage) was a United States Army Chemical Corps operation which dispersed microscopic zinc cadmium sulfide (ZnCdS) particles over much of the United States and Canada in order to test dispersal patterns and the geographic range of chemical or biological weapons.[1]

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +1

      Which has nothing to do with the 'chemtrail' hoax, so why mention it? Is your goal false equivalence? Or to prove that the 'chemtrail' hoax isn't real?

    • @msheart2
      @msheart2 10 місяців тому

      To search.
      " Saudi Arabia launches cloud-seeding programme to increase rainfall"
      [ NGulf National News]
      "Weather Program Office [NOAA] Weather Modification."
      " Weather and Climate Modification - National Science Foundation [NSF]"
      " NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL OD-14 CUMULUS CLOUDS AND THEIR MODIFICATION
      " S.3383 (94th): National Weather Modification Policy Act Introduced: May 5, 1976
      "Owning the Weather"
      "Project Popeye"
      " Project Cumulus "
      "PROJECT WOODPECKER"
      " Project Lucy"
      " Hurricane and tornado control device "
      "ATMOSPHERIC HEATING AS A RESEARCH TOOL confex"
      "China's radical $168 million weather control system revealed: '
      "China is massively expanding its weather-modification program, saying it will be able to cover half the country in artificial rain and snow by 2025"
      " Greening a Saudi Arabian Desert"
      " China plans to use chemicals to generate rain to protect its grain harvest
      August 21, 2022 "
      " WEATHER MODIFICATION INC"
      'Climate engineering by mimicking natural dust climate control: the iron salt aerosol method'
      " H.R.4586 - Geoengineering Research Evaluation Act of 2017 "
      "Preliminary Experimental Evaluation of Snomax (TM) Snow Inducer, Nucleus Pseudomonas syringae, as an Artificial Ice for Weather Modification" 1989
      "Silica aerogel nanopowder. What geoengineers 'plan' on putting into the atmosphere and environment. "
      " Weather Modification Using Electromagnetic Beams Common Knowledge at Aquiess,Inc"

    • @Jojo_Bee
      @Jojo_Bee 9 місяців тому +10

      IF they are testing, they've been testing for far very long already...

    • @pierricclot6544
      @pierricclot6544 9 місяців тому

      unless they found and implement something@@Jojo_Bee

    • @1DeGo-l4g
      @1DeGo-l4g 9 місяців тому +5

      @elyjahstark7549 Boy U get around..

  • @totttrax
    @totttrax Рік тому +104

    Explain those miles long ones that just linger and spread out eventually creating a blanket over the whole sky though

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +2

      Persistent contrails spreading via wind shear. They're nothing new.

    • @totttrax
      @totttrax Рік тому

      Shyt bag

    • @fabriciooliveira3720
      @fabriciooliveira3720 Рік тому

      Just ignore him, if you track back the comments you will see him and his fake profiles(siouxperb5570, Curious Cat, Ben, Elyjah Stark, John Catty, Yassassin) have been commenting here for more than 3 years, at least 10k comments are from them, they are being paid to deceive the sheep and keep the narrative.
      He is doing the same in many other "contrails" videos.....

    • @DanielSt-Laurent
      @DanielSt-Laurent Рік тому +1

      I can explain it.. those giant plumes of smoke is a geoengineering project by SAI with aluminum oxide, barium and strontium particles to modify the weather in order to perpetuate a climate crises for a globalist technocratic elite coup.

    • @Meekseek
      @Meekseek 10 місяців тому

      "Weather Program Office [NOAA] Weather Modification."
      " Weather and Climate Modification - National Science Foundation [NSF]"
      " NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL OD-14 CUMULUS CLOUDS AND THEIR MODIFICATION
      " S.3383 (94th): National Weather Modification Policy Act Introduced: May 5, 1976
      "Owning the Weather"
      "Project Popeye"
      " Project Cumulus "
      "PROJECT WOODPECKER"
      " Project Lucy"
      " Hurricane and tornado control device "
      "ATMOSPHERIC HEATING AS A RESEARCH TOOL confex"
      "China's radical $168 million weather control system revealed: '
      "China is massively expanding its weather-modification program, saying it will be able to cover half the country in artificial rain and snow by 2025"
      " Greening a Saudi Arabian Desert"
      " China plans to use chemicals to generate rain to protect its grain harvest
      August 21, 2022 "
      " WEATHER MODIFICATION INC"
      'Climate engineering by mimicking natural dust climate control: the iron salt aerosol method'
      " H.R.4586 - Geoengineering Research Evaluation Act of 2017 "
      "Preliminary Experimental Evaluation of Snomax (TM) Snow Inducer, Nucleus Pseudomonas syringae, as an Artificial Ice for Weather Modification" 1989
      "Silica aerogel nanopowder. What geoengineers 'plan' on putting into the atmosphere and environment. "
      " Weather Modification Using Electromagnetic Beams Common Knowledge at Aquiess,Inc"

  • @distancejunkiemonkey4491
    @distancejunkiemonkey4491 Рік тому +11

    Funny how in the northern California valley there will be no contrails for months. Oh, there are always jets flying over with a contrails that last maybe one minute at the most, but no long lasting contrails for months on end. And then just one day out of all those months, they’ll be multiple contrails that last all day. Isn’t it interesting how the meteorological conditions are just right for that for just that one day out of several months?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark Рік тому +4

      Funny how seasons and atmospheric science work. Who knew summers in Northern California are notoriously dry and then when fall rolls in, suddenly the temperatures drop and the relative humidity rises with more cloud cover and advancing cold fronts. Phenomenal observation!

    • @distancejunkiemonkey4491
      @distancejunkiemonkey4491 Рік тому

      @@elyjahstark funny how your seasons change for only one day lol

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark Рік тому +2

      @@distancejunkiemonkey4491 Oh if only you understood how dumb your comment was

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Рік тому +3

      @@distancejunkiemonkey4491 You never experienced one sunny day followed by few weeks of rainy weather or vice versa? What planet do you live on?

    • @onefourwhisky
      @onefourwhisky Рік тому +2

      Isn’t it interesting you did not post the time/ date or identity of the chemtrail planes... Are you unable to read a watch or calendar or ADS-B return ????

  • @connorjohnson7834
    @connorjohnson7834 6 років тому +89

    I'm a crop duster, I've never flown over 1000ft

    • @mikeb769
      @mikeb769 5 років тому +6

      Lies you flew above 1000ft when you got your lic

    • @johncarel3964
      @johncarel3964 5 років тому +5

      @@mikeb769 how many crop dusters have you seen spraying above 1000 ft?

    • @Porcke075
      @Porcke075 5 років тому +10

      There you go. That Captain Joe should be demoted to baggage handler. He's probably on G Soros' , Rockefeller or someone of their ilk's payroll. Maybe the EU is his employer?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 5 років тому +5

      CC C your claim has already been proven wrong on the other thread. Repeating it just makes you sound willfully ignorant.

    • @nicholaslokos7949
      @nicholaslokos7949 5 років тому +2

      No you are a Union Pacific 4000 series steam locomotive I s e e t h r o u g h y o u .

  • @dabbermcdabberson7398
    @dabbermcdabberson7398 5 років тому +879

    If you clicked on this video thinking this pilot was going to expose himself you got clickbaited

  • @skepticalmom2948
    @skepticalmom2948 2 роки тому +22

    The most important thing to remember is contrails dissipate because they are water vapor, chemtrails dont, they stick around for days. Explain that.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 2 роки тому +3

      Contrails are NOT water vapor. Water vapor is an invisible gas, and cannot be seen. What cannot be seen, cannot visually disappear. Contrails are ice, and will remain in the sky for as long as any other cirrus clouds will under the conditions.
      Or, do you not BELIEVE in clouds?

    • @skepticalmom2948
      @skepticalmom2948 2 роки тому

      @@siouxperb5570 , of course I believe in clouds. But clouds are more dense than contrails. Contrails dissipate very fast. They do not stick around for days. And clouds are made up of water vapor, not just ice, water droplets can stick to dust as well. Contrails are transitory because they are smaller amounts made by airplanes. They get moved quicker than clouds.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 2 роки тому +1

      @@skepticalmom2948 contrails are aircraft induced cirrus clouds. They are identical in density.
      Why do you wrongly believe contrails must dissipate very fast? Why don't natural cirrus clouds dissipate fast? Contrails will last as long as natural cirrus clouds in a given set of conditions.
      Again, clouds are NOT water vapor. All visible clouds are either solid (ice crystals) or liquid (water droplets). Vapor is an INVISIBLE gas. It cannot be seen. This is a law of physics, so you look very foolish trying to argue against it.
      But perhaps YOU could try explaining which chemical it is you believe can hang in the sky for many hours, growing in mass. Because water is the only one that will do that. But go ahead and defend your assertion.

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 2 роки тому +4

      "The most important thing to remember is contrails dissipate because they are water vapor"
      Last time I checked water at temperatures of below freezing point was solid.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 2 роки тому +4

      @@skepticalmom2948 "Contrails are transitory because they are smaller amounts made by airplanes."
      Your problem is, you don't know what contrails are. Admittedly, it is not explained thoroughly too often.
      Most people live under the impression, they see the water from the engines. Wrong. The engines produce too little water to make a visible track. That's why you don't see any contrails if the air is dry (RH below 70%). Contrails become visible only in ambient air of RH over 70% where the water (and some impurities in the exhaust gasses) triggers a deposition (the opposite of sublimation) process and the supercooled ambient vater vapors snap-freeze. This results into formation of a cirrus cloud (cirrus aviaticus) where only less than 0.1% of the material is the water from the engines. If the RH is really high, the deposition becomes a chain reaction spreading over a wide area. The result is perfectly natural cirrus cloud cover no different at all from any other.
      Dig it?

  • @mattjohnston7686
    @mattjohnston7686 9 місяців тому +4

    It's just the exhaust from the jet engines. Like the exhaust from your vehicle on a cold day. Those Jets fly at a high altitude where the air is cold, and you are able to see the condensation from the exhaust.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 9 місяців тому +1

      "Those Jets fly at a high altitude where the air is cold, and you are able to see the condensation from the exhaust."
      Close, but not true. This "almost true" explanation is being exploited by chemtards to "debunk" the contrails "theory" all the time.
      A typical airliner is releasing about 15 liters of water per each mile of its travel. This is not enough to create a visible cloud. What you see is condensed (or more accurately, "deposited") supercooled ambient moisture that "snap-froze" due to the action of the engines - that includes them adding extra water. See video "click heat science" for demonstration how it works.
      A visible contrail contains less than 0.1% of the water from the engines.

    • @Eruptionvr2000
      @Eruptionvr2000 6 місяців тому

      Why non on Saturday, but 100,s on Sunday??

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 6 місяців тому

      @@Eruptionvr2000 For the same reason as there was (for instance) sunny on Saturday and raining on Sunday. Change in atmospheric conditions.

  • @TheDkjayjay
    @TheDkjayjay Рік тому +9

    you are forgetting one important thing:
    jet-fuel is basically kerosene - with some additives, depending on at what temperature (flight level) it is ment to be used.
    these additives are added, to make sure that the fuel gets to the engines as a fluid, not as ice lumps.
    but here is the important thing:
    1 kg of burned jet-fuel gives 1.4 kg of water - and that water, when condensing, is the reason for the white trails following a high flying plane.
    how can burning 1 kg of kerosene result in 1.4 kg water?
    here is the answer:
    kerosene:
    formula: C10H22
    molecular weight: 142.3
    combustion: C10H22 + 31 O -> 10 CO2 + 11 H2O
    Molecular weight water (H20): 18
    18x11=198 thus:
    142.3 kg of kerosene gives 198 kg of water
    so burning 1 kg of kerosene gives 1.4 kg water.

    • @TheDkjayjay
      @TheDkjayjay Рік тому +4

      PS:
      modern high bypas turbo engines adds even more condensed water to the white trails.
      the compression of the bypass air around the turbine will, when released to the lower pressure surroundings, also condensate - and showing trails of condensed water.

  • @Rob_M_
    @Rob_M_ 7 років тому +669

    and of course.... the people who believe these theories will come here to say you're paid to say they don't chem trail

    • @TechTinkerWorks
      @TechTinkerWorks 7 років тому +10

      easier to pollute water, 2 people/town can do it.

    • @danielhermanus6909
      @danielhermanus6909 7 років тому +5

      BrotherGreed or maybe they just don't do it at all since there's no purpose and even if there would be, which government could afford that on a large scale? Most can't even afford social security 😂

    • @CzornyLisek
      @CzornyLisek 7 років тому +9

      There is dumping of things like dry ice and other chemicals to made raining -> so called cloud seeding. It was used for example in Beijing olympics event, all around Bejing planes sprayed chemical from few km so that there would be no rain over olimpic city and to dump all contaminated things in air into sewers.
      But such occasions are very very rare and're monitored very well. Well even number of planes that can do this is very very small.
      In war it is possible to use some (military)planes to do cloud seeding. But generally You don't even need planes to do that and it's also a thing that happens naturaly anyway.

    • @thedroplett214
      @thedroplett214 7 років тому +1

      you don't need to pay some1 to do this. a threat is enough.

    • @TheUglyGnome
      @TheUglyGnome 7 років тому +68

      I know for a fact that that the chemical in chemtrails is dihydrogen monoxide. They exist. That's a fact.
      That's the same chemical the government puts in our water supplies.

  • @fabriciooliveira3720
    @fabriciooliveira3720 Рік тому +154

    Persistent contrails and sundogs are extremely rare but for some mysterious reason we see it everyday now.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +17

      Neither of them are extremely rare. Got that pdf digested yet?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +5

      @Dan Teno Negative, sunshine! 😂

    • @28heisenberger
      @28heisenberger Рік тому +8

      Firmament

    • @PWEIcom
      @PWEIcom Рік тому

      ​@@siouxperb5570give me one photo of a chemtrail filled sky before 1980
      Man is either payed off or doesn't know fuck all

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 Рік тому

      @@danteno9706 Call me a bot if you want, but siouxperb is right :
      Persistent contrails aren't less or more rare among contrails than it supposedly was "before chemtrails". At most there are more of them because of the augmentation of aerial traffic.
      Also, it's not a new thing at all and has been documented for a long time :
      ua-cam.com/video/X72uACIN_00/v-deo.html

  • @EnigmaticAnomaly
    @EnigmaticAnomaly 4 місяці тому +5

    I just can't get behind this conspiracy for the simple fact that those responsible would be forced to breath the same tainted air poisoning the rest of us.

    • @johnsergei
      @johnsergei 4 місяці тому

      You need to learn how the monetary system works.
      Pay somebody enough money & they will do just about anything.
      It has been said their reason is the false claim of blocking the Sun & cooling the planet.
      I can't yet verify this, but I don't trust a bunch of liars + they have said the World would be better with a greatly reduced human population.

  • @hombreguerro4767
    @hombreguerro4767 2 роки тому +65

    I live near Cleveland, I’ve watched these planes for hrs at a time, they always do it just south of Cleveland a little to the east maybe about 40 miles south east of the city, when they do it the trails always end up being parallel to each other and crossed, it lingers in the air for hrs until it forms what looks like clouds or turns the whole sky into like a fog 🌫 🌫 🌫 🌫 🌫 🌫 🌫 I’ll see like 3 or 4 planes at a time super high up then they vanish I’ll start noticing other planes then they kind of vanish and so on, I know they are not going to the airport because I live super close to the airport and I know the commercial flights take off and landing route because they literally fly right over me, wtf is this crap already

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +13

      They are planes flying to airports that aren’t near you, hence why they are at cruising altitude. They are called contrails, and they persist when the atmospheric relative humidity is increasing, signs of an advancing weather front.

    • @demonride15
      @demonride15 2 роки тому +8

      @@elyjahstark stop answering everyone’s comments on here dam lmao.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +5

      @@demonride15 Why? Why would I deprive myself of the entertainment chemtrail believers offer? Also, for those honestly confused and seeking answers, do you think they should just be led to deception by con artists trolling UA-cam videos? You don’t think they should be given verifiable answers and evidence to their questions?

    • @hombreguerro4767
      @hombreguerro4767 2 роки тому +6

      @@elyjahstark Alex Jones was right

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +2

      @@hombreguerro4767 About???

  • @El.Chef.Guevara
    @El.Chef.Guevara 7 років тому +316

    Humanity is becoming stupidier without the aid of any chemicals

    • @SilverFan8
      @SilverFan8 6 років тому +2

      Not unless you count drugs as chemicals.

    • @ketmax2805
      @ketmax2805 6 років тому +6

      to be honest,every thing is a chemical

    • @lionpaws2262
      @lionpaws2262 6 років тому

      almost everythink

    • @davidbarry9690
      @davidbarry9690 6 років тому

      Daniel O. Give that man a drink haha

    • @ellisjackson3355
      @ellisjackson3355 6 років тому

      Daniel O. That's what you think

  • @GreaseMonkeyFix
    @GreaseMonkeyFix 3 роки тому +47

    You nearly had me until you told me you’d would get back to the funny switch in the cockpit and never did.

  • @tedhansen3846
    @tedhansen3846 9 місяців тому +10

    I worked for a minibus company that carried airline crews from the airport to the Hyatt Regency. Being a layman, I asked a pilot what was leaking out the backs of the engines and the pilot told me if that were something leaking the plane would be out of whatever it was leaking very fast...maybe just a few miles. He said it is a vapor trail made by the heat of the engines. No trail

    • @sk_tana
      @sk_tana 9 місяців тому

      I’m sure they sign NDA’s so they aren’t going to tell you the truth.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 7 місяців тому +1

      @@Andre-vr1ul Oh it does? Where does that happen?

    • @mariogallo6891
      @mariogallo6891 5 місяців тому +1

      Yes but that dissipate Strait away the chemical trails stay up there I have witnessed one side run out and the other side still going for a bit

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 5 місяців тому +2

      @@mariogallo6891 No, it does not sublimate immediately if the air is saturated with respect to ice. Do you apply that same parroted logic to clouds? Or have you not thought far through your claim?

    • @Andre-vr1ul
      @Andre-vr1ul 5 місяців тому

      @@elyjahstark Aerosol injection into the sky via aircraft in combination with a vast network of ionospheric heaters that both help scatter the chemicals and also manipulate pressure systems.

  • @robertslugg8361
    @robertslugg8361 7 років тому +10

    There is a certain irony in the recent complaints about the more persistent contrails in the sky. They are due to the development of the high-bypass turbofan engine which started to replace the turbojets in service a few decades ago. The turbojet uses thrust generated solely by the expanding exhaust as a means to propel the plane. The exhaust gasses exit at high velocity and high temperature, and therefore are widely dispersed by turbulence before cooling sufficiently to condense into a large, but mostly transparent contrail. In contrast, the turbo fan engine uses the exhaust gasses to mechanically drive a large fan at the front of the engine to generate the majority of the thrust. As the exhaust passes through the additional turbine disks needed to drive the fan, it slows in velocity and cools, so that when it exits the rear of the engine it can condense more quickly into a thick contrail. In addition, this central core exhaust plume is surrounded by a thick layer of cool air from the bypass fan which helps to contain the water vapor, thus enabling it to cool faster while the water molecules produced by combustion are still in close proximity. The irony comes from the complainers not realizing that turbofan engines are 50% more fuel efficient than turbojets, so the appearance of persistent contrails is a "better" thing. But hey, why let simple physics get in the way of a good conspiracy.

    • @doktork3406
      @doktork3406 6 років тому

      answe to the guy's quetstion chemtard !

    • @ketmax2805
      @ketmax2805 6 років тому

      Tony Browne
      fucking answer it you chem trail fuck

    • @andytyler3845
      @andytyler3845 6 років тому +1

      Robert Slugg. Thank you Robert. Very well said. The flat earth. Idiots with their aluminum foil hats will never undstand.

    • @CindyPraktish
      @CindyPraktish 2 місяці тому

      Ok, makes sense BUT
      why do they last all day?
      Why the cris-crossed patterns?
      Why the metallic rainbow around the sun?

    • @CindyPraktish
      @CindyPraktish 2 місяці тому

      ​@andytyler3845 just like the jab is safe? Just like the "flu" started in a wet market?

  • @MrCoffeeBreak
    @MrCoffeeBreak 6 років тому +101

    Wow! This new technology we have today is great! The new planes make the contrails last all day long instead of disappearing shortly after being created, like back in the day. Ah, science! :)

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 6 років тому +7

      Unintended consequence of turbofan engines. But, better for the environment because of their increased efficiency. Not much you can do about the contrails.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 6 років тому +6

      It's all good man. Probably not an option, but moving to an area under fewer airways would solve the sky problem for you. Just saying.

    • @Luison40
      @Luison40 2 роки тому +4

      You should start going to school instead of saying nonsense, I bet you didn’t even finish high school

    • @MoneylessWorld
      @MoneylessWorld 2 роки тому

      This virtue signaler or troll likes being poisoned at the speed of science.
      Ah, science! Certain death.

    • @MrCoffeeBreak
      @MrCoffeeBreak 2 роки тому +1

      @@Luison40 I finished school. It is You who needs more education, or to wake up and pull your head out of your ass.

  • @Chuck59ish
    @Chuck59ish 7 років тому +13

    In the older low bypass jet engines like used on the AWACS, the exhaust is black because fuel is used to cool the turbine blades, on the newer high bypass jet engines, the use more air and less fuel so the exhaust is cleaner.

    • @RichardFStripeRendezvous
      @RichardFStripeRendezvous 7 років тому +2

      Yep, watercooled engines

    • @Chuck59ish
      @Chuck59ish 7 років тому +4

      Only earlier aircraft like the AV8B Harrier with the Rolls-Royce F402-RR-408(Mk 107) used water injection to give it more thrust and in the case of the Harrier it used 75 gallons of distilled water. I know in 1986 at the Trenton Air Show at CFB Trenton, Ontario, I helped the Marine ground crew fill the Harrier at the Air Show. The problem was the people in charge wouldn't let them move the Harrier to a concrete ramp, so when the started it on the paved area, it set the oil in the pavement on fire when they applied full, water injected power. Jet engines are designed to use the air moving by the engines to keep the temperature down to around 800 F during flight.

    • @jimmy8959
      @jimmy8959 7 років тому

      Contrail would covering the whole sky..? Using a FLIGHTRADARS app U can see its the same aircraft with the same pilot without landing flying whole day n night that must be alien technology I think.. recently a short video of an A380 spraying thick grey CONTRAIL was caught by another captain flying nearby.

  • @rogerbouchard7135
    @rogerbouchard7135 Рік тому +28

    I was in Victorville California one time and a guy was calling them Chemtrails. I asked him why would they be putting out Chemicals from an airplane. He told me it was to make people lethargic and easier to manipulate. I looked at him simply asked him if he knew he was in Victorville California. LOL

    • @neo-toad
      @neo-toad Рік тому +11

      you proved what he said

    • @Meekseek
      @Meekseek 10 місяців тому +4

      @@neo-toad he did.

    • @MrrrAdryan
      @MrrrAdryan 8 місяців тому

      The people that are supposedly creating these "chem trails" would also have to live on this planet and breathe the chemicals lol, chem trails are def not a thing. Also for many reasons other than that, but you have to think critically before you choose to believe something far-fetched like this silly myth. Not talking about you, but people in general.

    • @Keep2u
      @Keep2u 8 місяців тому

      One guy told my friends friend they always jam out with Beat it, just beat it when they're in Victorville California. Hey is that Wonderland located in Victorville ? That would make the most sense , and why they-call them Trim or did you say Chemtrials ? Im getting a new dog thats what I'll call it, Beat It. Love you wonderful people, I get world class knowledge Thank You from the bottom of my heart

    • @kripaharris237
      @kripaharris237 6 місяців тому

      So you believed him ....😂😂😂

  • @MrShaunG
    @MrShaunG 5 років тому +250

    You're just a government agent, i knew it!

    • @vinir591
      @vinir591 5 років тому +1

      Lol

    • @AbdallaAwad
      @AbdallaAwad 5 років тому +3

      Yes, looks like he meant to decline it, not just a video

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 4 роки тому +2

      Tommie Reid No, it is a video to show the stupid what causes contrails.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 4 роки тому +1

      Tommie Reid Who is “THEY”? Fool. And what is your evidence that THEY admitted doing it? It can’t be a secret and public knowledge, now can it? If they admit it, then your logic that this video is a deflection is stupid.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 4 роки тому +3

      @Tommie Reid You are the one who comes with no evidence, and claims the "they", "them", "elites", "illuminati"....
      It's like dealing with my brothers kids. You clowns fall for every silly video on youtube.
      I dont create content on my channel. I didn't know I even had a channel until another fool like yourself pointed it out.
      Maybe you can explain why:
      pilots would fly in toxic clouds.
      pilots would spray over their homes.
      pilots would spray over government buildings.
      who is "spraying"
      how much is being "sprayed."
      what is being "sprayed".
      what effects are intended.
      There, that ought to keep you busy. If there is a way to get paid for pointing out the stupidity of chemtrail believersPlease let me know. Where did you ever get the 50 cents per negative comments information?

  • @firework121
    @firework121 7 років тому +298

    Hi, can you propably do a video about Cost Index? Would be great!

    • @QWEQFDASD
      @QWEQFDASD 7 років тому

      Good question :)

    • @derisim
      @derisim 7 років тому +5

      Mate, the cost index it's simple to understand. it's the relation between fuel eficiency and speeds. The higher the cost index the higher the speeds but also the higer the fuel consumption. Imagine that you put a cost index in the fmc of 30 then your cruze speed will be Mach 0.70 but if you put a cost index of 35 your speed will be 0.72 (pay atention, this values are just for example and not in reality). The FMC (flight managment computer) will manage the speed and fuel consuption according to the cost index. But i believe that Joe will maka a video about that.

    • @firework121
      @firework121 7 років тому +1

      derisim Thanks for your answer, appreiciate it! :)

    • @derisim
      @derisim 7 років тому +1

      firework121 no problem, if you have any more doubts be my guest, send a message and I will try to answer you ASAP ;)

    • @HB-ps6rn
      @HB-ps6rn 7 років тому +3

      tysdaddy970 Funnily enough I study at Colorado State University, but that article you refer to was a 1975 study of blocking solar radiation in the atmosphere using carbon dust (non-toxic) in order to study the potential for reducing rising sea temperatures. It is a very cheap process to do, just about as much as a normal flight. It might also be better to refer to the article properly as 'Weather Modification by Carbon Dust Absorption of Solar Energy', from William M. Gray et.al.

  • @konstantinpopov9547
    @konstantinpopov9547 5 років тому +57

    Well, I agree with what you said in the video. The 3rd explanation though - condensation - that is a real effect, BUT the trail shouldn't normally last too long. And I've seen the difference. Airplane passes, there is a contrail, but after a bit it disappears and it's not too long. Others leave a trail from one end of the horizon to the other, and it stays for hours. Please explain that! :)

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 5 років тому +9

      Konstantin Popov relative humidity and super saturation with respect to ice at where the trail is.

    • @konstantinpopov9547
      @konstantinpopov9547 5 років тому +8

      @@elyjahstark Yes, I can accept this answer, though, I am talking about the two planes, which passed one after another with fairly 20 minutes between the two. They seemed to fly on the same altitude and same trajectory, but, who knows. Atmospheric conditions didn't seem to change (visually).

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 5 років тому +8

      Konstantin Popov you said that they seemed to fly at the same altitude. How did you determine that when there is more than 15000 feet in variance between common cruising altitudes?Even 1-2 thousand feet is enough to change the humidity levels. That’s why patchy cloud cover exists. There’s also the fact that different planes and engines produce different amounts of water vapor based on their size and engine type. For instance, an airbus a380 is a massive plane and requires a lot of thrust to maintain lift. It’s engines are also more efficient and release the water vapor at cooler temperatures than other engine types. The result is a contrail that forms more readily and is much bigger.

    • @konstantinpopov9547
      @konstantinpopov9547 5 років тому +2

      @@elyjahstark Hence "Seemed" - don't get me wrong - I am not one of the fanatics on the Chem trails topics. I am curious about the logical, scientific side of the story :)

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 5 років тому +4

      Konstantin Popov then may i interest you in some reading. Check out the research paper ‘on the lifecycle of individual contrails’. It goes over the very specific conditions for contrail formation, persistence, and spreading. Another great resource is a weather website that gives rough altitudinal variations in temperature and relative humidity. There are a number out there. Instant weather maps is a good one.

  • @victorvastel8028
    @victorvastel8028 Рік тому +4

    Hello,
    Despite what a lot of people is claiming, as any cloud, contrails _can_ last and expand depending on the local pressure, humidity and temperature conditions.
    That's perfectly explained by laws of physics and meteorology and isn't a new thing.
    Please prove me wrong on that matter by proving me that *contrails can't last* ,
    How do you exclude that contrails could last?
    I'm genuinely wanting your actual arguments, sources, demonstrations and proofs that condensation caused by "normal" planes couldn't last or expand into wider cirri. Really, if that's not possible, if the physics laws our whole meteorology (and a shitload of other things in term of science and technology) is based on are false, if these laws are wrong or _made up_ , and you're able to *prove* it, then :
    1- You'll be assured to have a Nobel prize.
    2- I _WANT_ to know.
    No one (really : _NO ONE_ ) provided me such a proof so far, despite various (and sometimes totally unrelated) claims.
    And prove me by the way that you have enough understanding of weather science to make assertions on that matter since you're at it.
    If you're finding yourself unable to explain why there are natural clouds lasting in high altitude while contrails "couldn't" last, then try at least to be honest to yourself and to question your own knowledge and beliefs.

    • @wildboar7473
      @wildboar7473 Рік тому +1

      @elyjahstark7549 well said, They have their shills but plenty of dumb Sheeple jump on occasion to look smart. Perhaps they get brownie points with the Grandmaster Mason.... Cowards /Familiars desperately clinging to MS dictatorship of scientism.
      colophon
      I am not contradicting anybody. Persistent contrails (the kind which linger and spread rather than rapidly returning to the invisible vapour phase) have been known for at least half a century to consist predominantly of water from the air. This was experimentally quantified by Knollenberg in 1972: "The measured water mass within the contrail was found to be four orders of magnitude greater than that calculated as a combustion product". (J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 1367)
      colophon
      Engine contrails (of the persistent sort) are still almost entirely composed of water from the atmosphere. The amount of water introduced from the entire fuel load of even an A380 would be only about 340 tons, and this would be spread over thousands of linear miles. Nowhere near enough water to create a thick visible contrail. As studied by Knollenberg (among others) back in the 1970s, only about 1 part in 10,000 of the water in an engine contrail actually comes from combustion. The rest? Yup, out of the air.
      *CHEMTRAIL DENIERS HATE THIS VIDEO real contrails prove chemtrails!*
      - rockets push off air

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 Рік тому +2

      @@wildboar7473 Good evening and thanks for answering,
      " *Persistent contrails (the kind which linger and spread rather than rapidly returning to the invisible vapour phase) have been known for at least half a century to consist predominantly of water from the air.* "
      Which I agree with so far.
      " *Engine contrails (of the persistent sort) are still almost entirely composed of water from the atmosphere. The amount of water introduced from the entire fuel load of even an A380 would be only about 340 tons, and this would be spread over thousands of linear miles. Nowhere near enough water to create a thick visible contrail. As studied by Knollenberg (among others) back in the 1970s, only about 1 part in 10,000 of the water in an engine contrail actually comes from combustion. The rest? Yup, out of the air.* "
      Yes, you're right. This is _precisely_ the point of people not believing in chemtrails : persistent contrails happen in over saturated atmosphere in which most of condensation precisely comes for the over-cooled vapour that only needs a triggering to happen (from the contrails + condensation nuclei provided by the engines but often lacking at these altitudes and yet are necessary for condensation to happen).

    • @wildboar7473
      @wildboar7473 Рік тому

      @elyjahstark7549 Yeah sure Military /used planes, not like this idiot whining about "his plane" bull :) You seem confused, I have long left this topic, not going to brainstorm from old studies. CO2 is great for plants and they dont want that. they want mother Nature sick and us sick.
      Old ideal of depopulation, too many to control and for their needs.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark Рік тому

      @@wildboar7473Thank you for proving why the chemtrail hoax is physically impossible and why all of the trails are persistent contrails. And if you’re having trouble identifying any planes, feel free to use free flight radars and you’ll see they are almost all entirely from commercial airliners. And specifically passenger aircraft.

    • @wildboar7473
      @wildboar7473 Рік тому

      *WOW!* @@elyjahstark ME *prove* 😃 🤗 something, not often no-basic Science know-nothing ME does that on internet. Physics hey? Didnt I flunked that? all persistent..... no "special conditions".... yeah that's ME alright, bad eyesight :( ....did I say almost all entirely Military??? I swear I was for "Public" planes converted for that Military use. O well now I know myself better! ☺

  • @airindiana
    @airindiana 6 років тому +33

    I’m a B747 driver and can say day 1 of B747 ground school was “don’t tell them”. In the FCOM tech manual under the fuel section there’s a paragraph that reads “classified - not really fuel tanks. This aircraft doesn’t need fuel. Runs on unicorn tears. These are chemtrail tanks. For the purposes of discussion hereafter shall be referred to as “fuel tanks””
    Every now and then we fight the airlines over them trying to hammer our terms and conditions. We mention to blow the lid off chemtrails and then blokes in suits and dark glasses start appearing. You see them popping their heads above the rose bushes in the back garden. My advice to you all, buy a really good umbrella.

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 6 років тому +2

      Haha, really funny xD

    • @gentlestudios8483
      @gentlestudios8483 5 років тому +2

      HA! I knew it!

    • @hobbyhermit66
      @hobbyhermit66 5 років тому +1

      Leave it up to "B" to design a plane to run on unicorn tears. Imagine the power they could get from crocodile tear engines!

    • @Lawrence330
      @Lawrence330 5 років тому +4

      Lies!!! You're just a shill for the umbrella companies! Wait...Umbrella Corp?!?!?!!? I KNEW IT!!!!! /s

    • @srira7910
      @srira7910 3 роки тому +1

      Dehydrated Unicorn Tears

  • @RedDelPaPa
    @RedDelPaPa 6 років тому +25

    I'm in my mid 40's. I just wanna know while I was growing up, why I never saw tic-tac-toe streaks in the sky that stretch from horizon to horizon and hang there all day and slowly spread out into a thin milky haze? Didn't start seeing these regularly until somewhere around 1999. And people from many countries still report no such thing in their skies. Clearly this is a relatively new phenomena which explains why many people are now taking notice. I suspect it's coming from an additive in jet fuel that is harmless to the engines, which would also explain why pilots know nothing about it. What the purpose is I don't know. I have heard that it's an attempt to help combat global warming by reflecting a portion of the suns radiation back out into space.

    • @yassassin6425
      @yassassin6425 6 років тому +2

      People are noticing because it has become far more prevalent due to an exponential increase in air traffic and crucially routes flown.
      Coincidentally, 1999 was when the chemtrails conspiracy theory began in earnest through Coast to Coast AM and subsequently spreading across the internet . The conflation with geoengineering is due to those on the coattails of this attempting to vindicate the claims by claiming that research into Stratospheric Aerosol Injection is confirmation of chemtrails. To clarify, the chemtrail hoax that this video is debunking is the claim that large white plumes in the wake of commercial aircraft that the rational recognise as contrails are evidence of chemical spraying. If SAI was underway this would be at double the altitude and would be invisible to the ground based observer. It certainly wouldn't resemble a large white cloud out of the rear of a commercial aircraft.

    • @njsmeets66
      @njsmeets66 2 роки тому

      This is geo-engineering
      Part of depopulation agenda

    • @vikinglife6316
      @vikinglife6316 2 роки тому +5

      Because its chemicals. My step father works as a lead mechanic for Lockheed and Martin in Lexington KY he even knows what they are spraying and yes you are correct Im older than you and these tic tac toe never existed. Conttrails dont stay up there for hours spreading out across the sky.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +1

      @@vikinglife6316 Wow! Then it will be easy for you to provide evidence of what is being sprayed according to you! Let’s hear it!
      Your claim that these tic tac toe patterns never existed is contradicted by numerous pictures and videos dating back decades. Why do you believe contrails can’t persist? Did the laws of physics change? Or do clouds not exist in your reality?

    • @rochey07
      @rochey07 2 роки тому

      @@vikinglife6316 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @djzman
    @djzman 7 років тому +6

    Captain Joe, I have a Question. now i under stand contrails as you said in the vid.
    10 years ago i broke my legs so i was off work for a few months, I use to go outside and lay down and enjoy the sun, and look up. well I would see planes going across and they would have the contrail behind them and they never lasted long. But today looking up i see them all the way across the sky as fare as the eye can see. and they do not go away fast, some stay for a good hour to two hours. So how come they are staying longer then just a few years ago

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 7 років тому +1

      Although I don't like to reply to a question with a question I do it today anyway: during WWII it was known that long contrails of the bomber aircraft exposed the intention of their journey. Why were there long contrails in WWII and nowadays some people say that this is a new phenomenon which was never observed before?

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 7 років тому

      I really hate this but it seems that you guys just don't understand a different language. SHITBROWNIE accept physics and chemistry. Burning kerosene creates water and carbon dioxidee and, of course very little amount of other oxides. However, your brain seems to be too limited to understand this. Get your finger out of your butt and don't lick it and don't smell it unless you really like it. But that would be strange in my eyes.

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 7 років тому

      SHITBROWNIE I worked in the aviation industry. I maintained and reparied jet engines. Don't tell me that I don't know anything how planes work. I am way too old for such childish game. Hence, I will end it here unless you start to discuss in a serious manner.

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 7 років тому

      Oh, cutie. Your hobby as a kid was planes? Build with paper? They did not fly well considering your understanding of physics, did they? Check out if your local airport offers guided tours. Some airports do and they even show the maintenance hangars including engine test runs if you are lucky. Book a tour and ask the guide to show you everything you want to see. These guys are happy to brag with their knowledge. But don't tell them you believe in the existence of chemtrails. In that case they will laugh at you. Keep your believes for yourself and just observe. Let him open every single panel you can reach. Of course it won't be easy when you are touring around a wide body aircraft. But single aisle aircraft might work.

    • @flippos
      @flippos 7 років тому

      Tony Browne I'm so sorry, you were right all along, this video shows it all: ua-cam.com/video/ZEv0AWPAJcc/v-deo.html I'm so sorry I ever doubted you obviously highly educated rational logically thinking people!

  • @daniellecrawford6933
    @daniellecrawford6933 11 місяців тому +2

    There's a difference between contrails and
    Centrals

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 11 місяців тому +1

      "There's a difference between contrails and
      Centrals"
      100% correct, regardless of what those "centrals" are.

  • @PoonScurvy
    @PoonScurvy 7 місяців тому +3

    Technically water is a chemical. Checkmate.

  • @ironmanmachine
    @ironmanmachine 6 років тому +245

    How did you keep a straight face while listing the reasons chemtrails exist? 😂

    • @deannamaasbach6720
      @deannamaasbach6720 5 років тому +1

      ua-cam.com/video/3H80W6TbXd0/v-deo.html

    • @HenryLeaf
      @HenryLeaf 5 років тому +21

      @@DesertSky928 Nothing is being sprayed in the sky . You are seeing water condensation in the form of snow crystals. Go read contrailscience.com carefully so you have the correct science explanation.

    • @Lauren-gs1eh
      @Lauren-gs1eh 5 років тому +2

      Paid Gov't Debunker www.federalregister.gov/documents/search?conditions%5Bterm%5D=Chemtrails
      Here’s a real link

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 5 років тому +13

      @@Lauren-gs1eh The federal register returns a search with 1 document containing the word 'chemtrail'. But, when you type in "bigfoot" it returns 4 documents. If you type "unicorns", it returns 119 documents. Do you understand why, or do you need the explanation spoon fed to you?

    • @gordonbrittas4842
      @gordonbrittas4842 5 років тому +4

      @@siouxperb5570 Perhaps they are dropping chemicals to quiet down bigfoot?

  • @peterfinn6098
    @peterfinn6098 2 роки тому +6

    We call them vapour trails and yes its totally scientific as you describe. Some folk are so naive. Fuel dumping is also common for overweight landings are rare. Why don’t people listen in physics classes. Yeah crop spraying is only form of chemical spraying i know

    • @peterfinn6098
      @peterfinn6098 2 роки тому

      @@elyjahstark2107 ?

    • @peterfinn6098
      @peterfinn6098 2 роки тому

      @@elyjahstark2107 nice try for what, what assignment mate? Don’t get your comment what pay…lol

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому

      @@peterfinn6098 Don’t worry about him. He’s just impersonating my profile trying to harass people. If you report his comments, they disappear.

    • @ashleymcluckie7345
      @ashleymcluckie7345 2 роки тому

      So when your told that cloud seeding is happening by harpp and harpp says they use aluminum nono particles and barium to cloud seed now take a look at barium and aluminum nono particles and how unhealthy it those both are extremely unhealthy then that shit rains and it get in our dirt that grow plant animals eat plant we eat animals come on plus those fire in cali a few yes back since covid after the fires were out the took reading and samples of the area and found extremely high reading of aluminum and barium high high levels so I did a lil research and found that aluminum nono particles and barium together creat a highly flammable mixture the would have to no this ...food for thought

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому

      @@ashleymcluckie7345 cloud seeding is not happening by HAARP. HAARP is an ionospheric research center with vertically oriented high frequency waves used to excite ions a hundred miles in altitude. Cloud seeding is used by light aircraft one or two miles in altitude. Neither subjects have anything to do with any visible trails in the sky.

  • @sinashaffer714
    @sinashaffer714 5 років тому +29

    They sprayed chemtrails here up above our house last week. I have pictures to prove it.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 5 років тому +9

      Yes, let's see them. And no pictures of contrails allowed.

    • @firebird4491
      @firebird4491 4 роки тому +4

      Fucking idiot

    • @collinathomas7
      @collinathomas7 4 роки тому +1

      Same they did it in an x! Combining to chemicals that cant be together in one but did it in the air

    • @firebird4491
      @firebird4491 4 роки тому +2

      @@collinathomas7 You're actually dumb unironically

    • @firebird4491
      @firebird4491 4 роки тому +2

      @@BuddhaofBlackpool Yeah man my dad is gassing me that's a damn shame

  • @triggeredmonkey3439
    @triggeredmonkey3439 Рік тому +5

    Should have included pictures of World War II bombers creating contrails.
    Even piston engine airplanes can create contrails if the conditions provide.

    • @paratrooperlane7022
      @paratrooperlane7022 Рік тому

      Contrails and Chemtrails are two different things.

    • @triggeredmonkey3439
      @triggeredmonkey3439 Рік тому +3

      @@paratrooperlane7022
      Wow figured that out all on your own?
      Good job 🤗
      I think we've pretty much established that chemtrails discussed in the context that most people associate them with. Is right up there with Bigfoot and the Abominable Snowman.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Рік тому +4

      @@paratrooperlane7022 So, once for all: how do you tell the white lines on the photos from WW2 are contrails or chemtrails?

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 Рік тому +2

      @@paratrooperlane7022 "Contrails and Chemtrails are two different things."
      Technically they are the same. It's just the mind of some people who cannot understand why some contrails can persist.

    • @gainmaster1
      @gainmaster1 4 місяці тому

      @@johncatty6560 But why where i live you can not hear the echo of one plane in the sky on a cloudy dull day yet when there is a sunny day you can hear and see loads fly directly in front of sun, leave a haze then hear or see nothing for hours till it gets sunny again, surely this is not a coincidence?

  • @Patriot-hz8xk
    @Patriot-hz8xk Рік тому +26

    I find it very interesting that youtube throttles and deletes ACTUAL VIDEO EVIDENCE CLIPS OF THE US AIR FORCE DUMPING UNKNOWN CHEMICALS. VIDEOS RECORDED FROM WITHIN THE AIRCRAFTS!

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Рік тому +2

      There never was an "actual evidence" in any shape and form. You can't have an evidence of something what doesn't exist.
      You probably, in your blissful ignorance, mean this video:
      "KC-10 Tanker Chemtrail Sprayer 100% Proof - Filmed Up Close By AF Pilots"
      which is live and kicking on YT and which is just a spoof video of footage taken during a refueling operation. The crew is making jokes aimed at the chemtrails hoax.

    • @stephenbogan5961
      @stephenbogan5961 9 місяців тому

      Let me guess. The mysterious "they" deleting the videos can be the only reason why you cannot find video evidence, huh...

    • @Ann-bm5qg
      @Ann-bm5qg 7 місяців тому +3

      Yes I’ve got some and they are from a pilot. One photograph is of a switchboard in a plane. Above one of the switches it reads Chemtrails.

    • @kripaharris237
      @kripaharris237 6 місяців тому

      😂😂😂

  • @Chimney_Swift
    @Chimney_Swift 5 років тому +81

    wait water is a chemical
    firefighting craft drop chemicals

    • @andresaveiro2641
      @andresaveiro2641 5 років тому +1

      HOLY SHIT!!!!

    • @mawage666
      @mawage666 5 років тому +5

      Water? You mean like out the toilet?

    • @B30smo
      @B30smo 5 років тому +1

      These guys are paid to lie. Care to explain why they are drawing satanic pentagrams and crosses with chemtrails over christian families ? If you do your research you'll understand that they're all in on it and that the web of corruption is huge and involves scientists, politicians, media, military, intelligence agencies, finance, multinationals and the vatican. Look up ted gunderson. Many good men have died for exposing the truth and this bozo is staining their memories with his satanic lies. He's either a complete brainwashed fool or paid to lie. Alister crowley worshipped the devil and admitted to sacrificing 150 children a year without ever facing prosecution. Do not be fooled. Albert Pike, Alister Crowley and so on. They try to make you sound crazy and silence you if you tell the truth about them. Spirit cooking (you'll find the same pentagrams there along with some 666s), GeorGia Guidestones (6eor6ia 6uidestones), pizzagate, their handsigns. Even the CIA admits some of it on their online library. The truth is in front of your eyes. The role of government, police, army and intelligence agency is to protect its people and its nation. They have been hijacked from their functions and tricked into this satanic religion which is all about lies, theft, corruption and murder. You are financing your own genocide and listening to the sweet lies of one of their puppets rather than facing the harsh truth. That they lie and your government no longer serves your interests but their own. Most people are too scared to tell the truth, afraid to die or afraid of retaliation and losing their reputation, wealth and status. We are ruled by cowards, criminals who have sold their souls to the devil. They do not serve their function anymore but destroy their countries and murder their populations for profit. They are committing high treason and one day they will face justice. See you in hell.

    • @jeramiet154
      @jeramiet154 5 років тому +9

      Dihydrogen monoxide is some dangerous stuff. SCARY CHEMICALS... ...BOO!

    • @jeramiet154
      @jeramiet154 5 років тому

      @@B30smo all of this minus the crazy chemtrails stuff and religious bullshit is actually pretty accurate.

  • @XAuroraM
    @XAuroraM 7 років тому +9

    You should have maybe gone a bit more into detail about why some contrails disapear immediately and some stay there for long periods of time and the atmospheric conditions required for them to be visible. Just saying because that's the most commonly used "proof" by the chemtrail fanatics as they never been to school long enough to understand why that happens ;)

    • @youflyibuy
      @youflyibuy Рік тому

      Mr. Tattoo pilot man. Youre are a rude, probably short, probably single after 1-3 divorces man with probably very few friends. I did notice its been 5 yrs since you posted. So lets change the very few friends to NONE.

    • @XAuroraM
      @XAuroraM Рік тому

      @@youflyibuy lmao telling someone on the internet on a 5 year old youtube comment he has no friends..oh the irony😂 then again thanks for prooving my point about some specially challenged people making random assumptions and then claiming they are true.. i do feel sorry for you though i hope you will find happiness in life again one day😘

  • @ChemTrailsMN
    @ChemTrailsMN 11 місяців тому +2

    *Great Video! Great information here! WOW!* ✈✈✈✈✈✈✈✈✈✈

  • @johncatty6560
    @johncatty6560 2 роки тому +8

    Keith has gone totally nuts. He changed the name of his Keith David account to Elyjah Stark and created another one with the same name today. Now he is talking to himself. And the fun part is: he *admitted* that he knows that all accounts which he claimed to belong to the real Elyjah Stark are in fact accounts of *different individuals* :D Let's see when he will delete that post ...

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +5

      It’s endearing knowing I have that much impact on his emotional well-being

  • @blueeyes3555
    @blueeyes3555 2 роки тому +18

    Just updating my post from a month ago ...the temp still hasn't reached 75 degrees outside and the rain hasn't stopped for mote than a couple days. So here's a question for Captain Joe. I read that the conditions has to be a certain temp and humidity for the contrails to stay and linger for hours and hours. Well since the beginning of March every single sunny day we have had which has been quite a few the conditions are magically perfect because by 10 11 am then bam the contrails stay and spread out for miles , meet up with each other and blocks the sun by 4 or5 and the next day it rains. Coincidence ? Has anyone even seen he weird cloud formations up there lately. We have a white sky or a badly faded blue that is nowhere near like the beautiful blue that should be there and below the white sky there are huge white puffy clouds then little lines of jet black clouds below and at the same level. Now Captain Joe what the hell kind of cloud formations would you call that?

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 2 роки тому +10

      Has ever crossed your mind the conditions at 30,000 ft are different than at the ground level? Just asking...

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 2 роки тому +9

      Shocking! Contrails indicate a rise in humidity level! Nobody knew that before!!!
      Except for most of the older farmers who did not have an app to check the weather when they started their job.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +6

      I love how you’re still confused by weather in Portland Oregon 😂😂 and that you don’t understand that when wave after wave of fronts come through an area, the sunny days in between will be perfect for contrail persistence.

    • @blueeyes3555
      @blueeyes3555 2 роки тому

      @@elyjahstark Are you a pilot or have you ever been in the sky at 35000 feet without being in an airplane , No you are no pilot nor have you ever felt the air outside of an airplane at 3500 feet so all you know is what you have read. Just like YT everything you read is also questionable. And the government never sprayed our people with agent orange or poisoned the water or done LSD experiments on us either right ? What makes you think they have evolved since then ?

    • @blueeyes3555
      @blueeyes3555 2 роки тому

      @@curiouscat8457 Oh really never knew that , whatever, Google spraying the skies will you please

  • @lowquality9232
    @lowquality9232 7 років тому +10

    even though i dont believe this, its stupid to think theyd inform the pilots about this and think they wouldnt tell anyone

    • @zazuch
      @zazuch 6 років тому +2

      zero chan again do you realize even if they left the pilots ignorant how many grounds crew would wonder why there is a secret tanker that adds a special liquid to the plane? If you say it's not added to the planes on the ground but in the fuel. Again the question begs do you realize how many refineries there are that would have to have either government agents there or the refineries be in on it? To properly coat the world via commercial jet liners there would be so many people in on it that they couldn't keep it a secret.

    • @bobingalls4643
      @bobingalls4643 3 роки тому +1

      There are people in the airforce who load the canisters onto the planes who know about this. But they are not talking according to one female whistleblower.

    • @centralintelligenceagency9003
      @centralintelligenceagency9003 2 роки тому +2

      300000 Commercial pilots worldwide and 300000 A&P mechanics in the USA alone, and not at least a handful of whistleblowers?
      Yeah. Right.

  • @Ben-mk9ig
    @Ben-mk9ig 7 місяців тому +5

    Victory! Bobby Diddles, whose username appeared as @garrywolf3, has deleted his entire thread. This is his reply to me:
    Bobby Diddles replied: "Ben whats this got to do with you Ben? 🤣 your all so easy to tease. Another linear thinker for the heap. Finders crossed they double their efforts spraying over your house"
    Apparently he didn't like me calling him out for having the EQ of an immature ten year old. By deleting his thread, he certainly demonstrated that he is no man!

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 7 місяців тому +2

      Bummer, that thread was just getting good!

    • @tynewlin
      @tynewlin 4 місяці тому

      Damn, I didn't get my first EQ until I was 13. Tweaking linear pots is half the fun of listening to music.

    • @ItsTheFuzzMan
      @ItsTheFuzzMan 4 місяці тому

      @tynewlin Linear EQs are good for mastering but I prefer parametric on the tracks. Keeping my finders crossed on a good deal on a Pultec, the seller is a pilot and he's out on a chemtrail run rn.

    • @tynewlin
      @tynewlin 4 місяці тому

      @@ItsTheFuzzMan You're right, I shouldn't have specified linear pots. I was describing my first EQ, a pre-amp Panasonic with singular RCA input/output. Got it at a thrift shop. Used between a 4-input A/V switcher and an Optimus AM/FM receiver/amp.

    • @ItsTheFuzzMan
      @ItsTheFuzzMan 4 місяці тому

      @tynewlin Oh yeah, silly me, We're talking about childhood EQs.

  • @GhostHostMemories
    @GhostHostMemories 7 років тому +203

    To be "fair" a 'contrail' IS a chem trail. Water is a chemical.. so.... ;-) But honestly, there is NO way that the chemtrail conspiracy (hey chemtrail isn't a word recognized by autocorrect!) could be as large as all the airlines, pilots, mechanics, tech and whatnot and still be "kept secret"

    • @GhostHostMemories
      @GhostHostMemories 7 років тому

      i don't negate that governments as a whole aren't doing it because it's only limited to commercial airlines. there are also cargo only lines, private charters, military etc. thus the last part "everyone" keeping quiet about it remains true. there have been leaks coming out of a smaller sets of people.

    • @CzornyLisek
      @CzornyLisek 7 років тому +1

      There is dumping of things like dry ice and other chemicals to made raining -> so called cloud seeding. It was used for example in Beijing olympics event, all around Bejing planes sprayed chemical from few km so that there would be no rain over olimpic city and to dump all contaminated things in air into sewers.
      But such occasions are very very rare and're monitored very well. Well even number of planes that can do this is very very small.
      In war it is possible to use some (military)planes to do cloud seeding. But generally You don't even need planes to do that and it's also a thing that happens naturaly anyway.

    • @Treadstone7
      @Treadstone7 7 років тому

      even exhaust gases are chemicals, so...

    • @sonsofthunder915
      @sonsofthunder915 7 років тому +3

      To be fair a contrail is NOT a chemtrail. Wake up------> www.technologyreview.com/s/603974/harvard-scientists-moving-ahead-on-plans-for-atmospheric-geoengineering-experiments/

    • @mgoblue0970
      @mgoblue0970 7 років тому +2

      Water is a "COMPOUND" not a "chemical". You are mistaken.

  • @lustalgia...
    @lustalgia... 4 роки тому +44

    military
    not your plane bud

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому +6

      Military aircraft are no more capable of defying the laws of physics than a civilian aircraft.

    • @amirmokrane366
      @amirmokrane366 4 роки тому +2

      If you are talking about the colourful smoke from jets, those are probably for the purposes of the parade

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 3 роки тому +3

      @Bradley Harrington Shocking! So you saw contrail persistence right before a cold front moved over. Weird, it’s almost like the persistent contrails are indicative of advancing cold fronts which bring in increased moisture.

    • @noobninja3596
      @noobninja3596 3 роки тому

      @Bradley Harrington dude you might be living in busy airspace, and the temp lowered because the temp was lower in the atmosphere way above before, causing contrails

    • @noobninja3596
      @noobninja3596 3 роки тому +1

      @Bradley Harrington mate it might seem suspicious but loading chemicals in a plane is an extremely big risk and its impossible to put that much payload

  • @alfamontydog
    @alfamontydog 2 роки тому +9

    What people don't understand is the chemical reaction that takes place when we burn fossil fuel .
    Every kilogram of gasoline, jet fuel etc. combines with oxygen and burns turning into one kilogram of water and a half kilogram of carbon dioxide and of course nitrogen oxides and some other gasses. Same what comes out of the tail pipe of your car.
    What we see as contrails or vapour trails is water turned into ice crystals. This is mostly happening at very high altitude since the air is very cold, usually above 26,000 feet.
    This was first noticed on a large scale during WWII when the bomber fleets consisting of B17's and Lancasters flew over Germany and got into dog fights with fighter planes, lots of pictures to see , just go on Google.
    So, no chemicals, just water an CO2

    • @magnusmaximus9102
      @magnusmaximus9102 2 роки тому +3

      @Mystic Truth he's a weak kaant

    • @georgesmakris9970
      @georgesmakris9970 2 роки тому

      Watch " the dimming'

    • @waltermartin6187
      @waltermartin6187 Рік тому

      You are wrong they admitted that they are cooling the earth with chemicals like aluminum and barium they come right now and admitted it and know we can not stop them

    • @HPDrifter2
      @HPDrifter2 9 місяців тому

      Correct.

  • @chesterwilberforce9832
    @chesterwilberforce9832 8 місяців тому +4

    A high school friend of min posted a meme showing contrails trailing a modern commercial jet with the caption "Do you remember these when you were a kid? Me neither" as if it is some modern day nefarious new world order plot. Someone simply replied with a photo of B-17's flying over Germany in WWII leaving some impressive plumes behind them.

    • @Andre-vr1ul
      @Andre-vr1ul 7 місяців тому +3

      That's when this tech was being developed.

    • @SD-vy7gj
      @SD-vy7gj 7 місяців тому

      Plains spray contrails not perminant clouds you frightened, brainwashed slave. X

    • @Ann-bm5qg
      @Ann-bm5qg 7 місяців тому

      It started after WW2. The is now they have increased the frequency and regularity. It’s about six days a week in England. They let the sun in one day to try and trick us or if it’s a special day like Remembrance Day.

  • @TadejSmerke
    @TadejSmerke 7 років тому +12

    Here are a few more details on the matter:
    Humidity of the air plays a large part in contrails. Part of those exhaust gasses from an airplane engine is water and when the airplane travels through the air, the water basically adds to the humidity of the air a bit more. And if the conditions are right, the humidity exceeds 100%, meaning clouds start to form - contrails. That is why sometimes contrails are not visible, and sometimes they are long lines; this just means that the air humidity is high when the trails are long, and low when they dissapear quickly.
    And humidity is determined somewhat by the air temperature and the dew point temperature. And the higher up we go, the closer these two are. So this is why contrails form mostly high up in the air and not relatively low in the sky.
    Something along these lines. I'm still studying ATPL theory :)

  • @zoranbrasnjo7488
    @zoranbrasnjo7488 5 років тому +8

    What are the physics between contrails that stay in the sky for a very long time and contrails that don't last that much?

    • @Daniel_JS
      @Daniel_JS 5 років тому

      I think it might have something to do with the temperature

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 5 років тому +7

      Relative humidity is the single biggest factor. Dry air means a shorter lived contrail. Ice supersaturated air means contrails that will last many hours, spreading to over a mile wide due to wind shear in a lot of cases.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +1

      @@siouxperb5570 Wow, it’s been years since Keith has tried to use the weatherman forecast “argument” 😂😂

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 2 роки тому +1

      @@elyjahstark Maybe he's giving the "persistent contrails don't exist" argument a break?

    • @Mihalyofficial
      @Mihalyofficial Рік тому

      You can easily tell because real contrails dissipate. Chemtrails form a haze of heavy metals that block the sun. They have admitted this long ago and are calling it stratospheric aerosol injection.

  • @noblecyborg-savage
    @noblecyborg-savage Рік тому +2

    Ya you didn't get into any of the patents for weather modification. they are easy to look up they have patents going back as far as 1891 and one I find interesting from 1932 for "charges aerosol delivery" meaning a jet is spraying charged aerosol. you only showed a small plane spraying pesticides but they have pictures online of the inside of jets with containers that are the chemtrail planes.

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 Рік тому +2

      Hi,
      There's an other explaination about those containers : different charges and charge repartitions for testing planes. Have you heard of it and if so what did you think of it ?

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Рік тому +4

      Patent is not a proof of the patented device or procedure. There are 21 patents for a time machine, for instance.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +3

      "you didn't get into any of the patents for weather modification"
      Because he stayed on topic. He is talking about the 'chemtrail' hoax, not cloud seeding.

    • @guillermoelnino
      @guillermoelnino Рік тому

      ​@@curiouscat8457and accusiation of defrauding banks doesnt constitute a conviction. But that didnt stop y ou from believing orange man's property was worth a fraction of what it actually is.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark Рік тому +2

      ⁠@@guillermoelninoAnd the winner for worst logical fallacy deflection goes to Guillermo! Well done. You finally achieved something in your life

  • @nityamodha97
    @nityamodha97 7 років тому +8

    Hey Captain Joe, can you please tell us in a video why an airplane is grounded (connected to ground) when it is being refueled

    • @matsmoreau9295
      @matsmoreau9295 7 років тому +7

      Nitya Modha I'm certainly no expert, but I believe that this is to dissipate static charge build up caused by the fuel flowing through the hose. This is done to reduce the risk of a spark being produced from the static electricity, which could obviously cause big problems if it contacted the fuel.

    • @alaric_
      @alaric_ 7 років тому +1

      To dissipate possible static charge between plane and fuel truck. Has sometimes (although rarely) been known to ignite cars in petrol stations so it's a valid tactic to use grounding.

    • @ukar69
      @ukar69 7 років тому +2

      Even your two seat Cessnas usually have a clip attached to their exhaust from a cable connected to earth when refuelling

    • @TheAdaaamski
      @TheAdaaamski 7 років тому +1

      I'm no plane expert but I know from experience that those two previous answers are correct if you were speaking about filling an LPG powered forklift. So I suppose it could quite probably be the same for fuelling an aircraft!

    • @bosk64
      @bosk64 7 років тому +2

      To avoid electro-static sparks which could ignite fuel

  • @loganseales682
    @loganseales682 7 років тому +346

    Oh man haha I knew it would be a crop duster haha 😂 nice one Joe

  • @14112ido
    @14112ido 5 років тому +102

    I love that dramatic editing on the cropduster 😂.

    • @ryanparker4996
      @ryanparker4996 2 роки тому +1

      Its not even funny. Crop-Dusters are not the only kind of chemical treatment aircraft that exist. Look up Cloud-Seeding. Its how they make it rain in Dubai. Its been used since the 60s, in Vietnam as a weapon. They also did it at Woodstock '69. All verifiable.

    • @Vexioner
      @Vexioner 2 роки тому +3

      @@ryanparker4996 u ok?

    • @ryanparker4996
      @ryanparker4996 2 роки тому

      @@Vexioner freedom of information requests exist, kiddo

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +4

      @@ryanparker4996 Cloud seeding doesn’t make it rain. You may want to actually research what cloud seeding is. It takes existing rain systems and attempts to add nucleates to possibly increase rainfall by 10-15 percent, although the efficacy is very questionable. What are your issues with cloud seeding?

    • @ryanparker4996
      @ryanparker4996 2 роки тому

      @@elyjahstark that we werent asked wether or not we wanted to be inhaling and ingesting the shite they spray into the clouds to encourage the rainfall, were we? No

  • @dirkswart8950
    @dirkswart8950 9 місяців тому +4

    So what's in the fuel you're dumping overboard it's not like it doesn't pollute

    • @hardcoredoom5892
      @hardcoredoom5892 8 місяців тому

      No one’s “dumping” anything overboard. 😂 Jesus, man. Get educated or shut up.

  • @cmdreffietrinket
    @cmdreffietrinket 3 роки тому +99

    I am far from clever, but just knowing there are people in the world who are significantly dumber than even I am, is very troubling indeed.

    • @chrisholder4978
      @chrisholder4978 3 роки тому +4

      are you implying that the editor of this video is dumber than you? If so, then KUDOS!!

    • @tuwinnsol9706
      @tuwinnsol9706 3 роки тому +1

      I hope this low intelligence doesn’t spread cause I am sick of it. For the record these are sleeple my term for sheeple.

    • @markrymanowski719
      @markrymanowski719 3 роки тому +17

      @@tuwinnsol9706
      I shall define your term 'Sleeple'.
      People who believe JFK was assassinated
      by Lee H Oswald.
      People who believe vacinnes
      don't cause Autism.
      People who believe 9/11
      was an Islamist attack.
      People who believe geoengineering
      is not being used yet.
      People who believe flouride in the
      water is good for us.

    • @markrymanowski719
      @markrymanowski719 3 роки тому +8

      @@oscarb9139
      The contrary evidence is b.s.
      Persistent contrails are an impossibility.
      These trails are all over the place.
      Especially in areas where there are no
      regular flight paths.
      And all over the north pole!!
      Many people holidaying there,
      all year round, apparently.
      Maybe that's where all the ice has gone.
      People taking a trophy ice pack home with them as they leave.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 3 роки тому +4

      @@markrymanowski719 You know that flights go from the east coast almost right over the top of the North Pole, right?
      Persistent contrails written for kids so you should be able to understand it.
      www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/contrails_k-12.pdf#:~:text=Persistent%20%28Spreading%29%20Contrails%20%28Img.%204%29%20are%20formed%20in,wide%20area%2C%20giving%20them%20a%20more%20cloud-like%20appearance.

  • @bluefluke7585
    @bluefluke7585 4 роки тому +22

    Okay, so what airlines are doing those checkerboard pattern departures or landings?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому +1

      All of them, but not on departure or landing.

    • @paulotonedef
      @paulotonedef 4 роки тому +2

      @@siouxperb5570 Perth, West Australia is only departures or landings. Nobody flys over Perth on the way to somewhere else. It's too remote. So why do we have constant trails?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 4 роки тому +5

      @@paulotonedef "Perth, West Australia is only departures or landings. Nobody flys over Perth on the way to somewhere else. It's too remote."
      Really? Then why all the high altitude airways?
      skyvector.com/
      AWFUL lot of published high altitude airways for a place that only has departures, and arrivals. Sort of makes the ICAO look pretty foolish for publishing them, huh? Someone ought to tell them NO ONE flies OVER Perth on the way to anywhere else, and to amend their charts accordingly......

    • @tracyfunk3928
      @tracyfunk3928 3 роки тому

      @@paulotonedef The same thing in the US. Planes don't fly directly west of Cali, unless they are headed mostly North or South. WHY? Because it takes too much fuel to go anywhere in that direction. Planes simply can't carry the weight. Yet there are still CHEMtrails West of SF.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 3 роки тому +3

      @@tracyfunk3928 Flights going from LAX to Asia always head up over Anchorage. It’s called a great circle route and is influenced by ETOPs restrictions. That’s why there are CONTRAILS west of SF.

  • @dpm-jt8rj
    @dpm-jt8rj 5 років тому +14

    Is that Dutch Pilot Girl asking the questions?

  • @garybowler5946
    @garybowler5946 7 місяців тому +8

    They are spraying whipped cream and sprinkles for the sky unicorns to eat.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 7 місяців тому +3

      Definitely more plausible than barium aluminium and lithium. 🙂

    • @tedtalour6414
      @tedtalour6414 7 місяців тому

      ​@@curiouscat8457how do you figure?

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 7 місяців тому +2

      @@tedtalour6414 "how do you figure?"
      Simple. I was flying commercial jets for 30 years. I've seen in my load manifests whipped cream and sprinkles plenty of times. Never any chemicals that would fit the description of the stuff "chemtrails" are allegedly made of.

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 7 місяців тому +2

      Shhh! Don't give it away, the glitter horses are a classified state secret. :)

  • @gym4kids704
    @gym4kids704 4 роки тому +8

    I am currently doing a research project on chemtrails for my own knowledge. The reason i'm doing chemtrails is because recently I travelled to Bali and whilst I was in the pool of the villa I was in I noticed a plane spraying a white vapour substance in the air. At first I thought the plane was going to write a message for an ad like I sometimes see back at home. This plane didn't do that, it just sprayed the white vapour substance in rows of about 100 metres than flew away and I could very vaguely see it repeating the spraying process very far away. After about 5 minutes the white vapour substance had spread and was covering kilometres and kilometres of the sky, like a giant flat cloud. I then remembered seeing these strange looking clouds at my home in Australia. Since I have returned to Australia I keep noticing these clouds everywhere I go. That was the only time I saw a plane do that. If the strange clouds I see are what I saw in Bali I recon the reason I saw them was because the place I was staying in was hours away from the tourist areas.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 4 роки тому +1

      The reason you saw them were because the ambient air that the planes were flying through was high in relative humidity and very cold. Chemtrails are a physically and mathematically impossible hoax that has no evidence.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 4 роки тому +2

      It is hard to say what you saw. From the description it looks like something from an X-Files episode (the scale, timeframe). It looks like the stuff you brought from Bali doesn't do you much good either. This doesn't make any sense: "If the strange clouds I see are what I saw in Bali I recon the reason I saw them was because the place I was staying in was hours away from the tourist areas." Stop smoking it.

    • @TheHailstorm77
      @TheHailstorm77 2 роки тому

      Maybe you should use better example like agent orange that was used during Vietnam War. Oh but the government would still lie and misdirect people into think chemtrails are contrails when cloud seeding and SAI ( Stratospheric Aersol Injection) is another Chemtrail used.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +1

      @@TheHailstorm77 A better example? You provided two completely irrelevant examples to the chemtrail theory regarding the persistent trails in the sky. One was a low altitude defoliant used during the Vietnam war that didn’t leave long persistent trails and which emptied their payload in a matter of minutes. And the other is a hypothetical plausibility study that again would have nothing to do with visible trails in the sky, especially behind airliners randomly arrayed around the sky.

    • @DRONEPOISON
      @DRONEPOISON Рік тому

      @@elyjahstark lying gatekeepers of truth

  • @kikiangels5859
    @kikiangels5859 7 років тому +15

    The term "chemtrails" was transformed into a derogatory term long ago. If you mention the word, you're considered insane and paranoid. The proper term is geoengineering and Solar Radiation Management (SRM). One component of this secret geo-engineering program is known as chemtrails. For those who have never heard of chemtrails, they are not to be confused with contrails, which are the normal exhaust vapors ejected from jet engines in flight.The US Air Force, the United Nations and other national and international governments will never admit to chemtrail activity, but they do acknowledge geoengineering in which chemtrails fall under. So many people are having a hard time understanding and believing this easy to see phenomenon, even with so much official information on the matter. I made this video with hopes that some people who do not believe in chemtrails will open their eyes and see the truth. I don't have all the answers and I certainly don't have a solution to this problem, but I do know that mass awareness is necessary to pursue changes

    • @RosGamesBG
      @RosGamesBG 2 роки тому

      Come on, man. We hear this "the government tries to kill us" crap for a century... yet... population goes up rapidly... no evidence at all. Only shallow talk. Independent researches debunk all these conspiracy but I guess conspiracy theorists accuse idenpendent researchers as part of the elite global conspiracy lol

    • @peacedreamerable
      @peacedreamerable 2 роки тому

      I call them Chemtrails as that was how they were originally refered to when being documented by those doing the experiments many decades ago. The term Geoengineering came later. Its not all about weather manipulation as you know , its also geological , chemical and biological warfare .

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому

      @@peacedreamerable They we’re never originally referred to as Chemtrails. They have always been contrails and geoengineering research has always been referred to as geoengineering or it’s various sub topics. And weather manipulation, aka cloud seeding, is a completely separate subject field. All of which have nothing to do with any visible trails in the sky

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому

      There are no SRM proposals that involve visible trails behind airliners. You are observing persistent contrails and no amount of parroted false equivalence fallacy will change that.

  • @cantona222
    @cantona222 5 років тому +41

    Chemtrails are the 90s flat earth.

    • @cantona222
      @cantona222 5 років тому

      @Kreonsa I think we upset a believer of flat earth here 🤣

    • @Kat-I-am3333
      @Kat-I-am3333 5 років тому

      Kreonsa more like today's 'food'!

    • @BANDIT198455
      @BANDIT198455 5 років тому +2

      NO MR. SHEEPLE THEY ARE REAL JUST LOOK UP ONE DAY AND SEE THE TRUTH.

    • @feuer_0528
      @feuer_0528 5 років тому

      Chemtrails are real flat earth is bs

    • @Xenibalt
      @Xenibalt 5 років тому

      no

  • @Ben-mk9ig
    @Ben-mk9ig 10 місяців тому +3

    For all of you who have claimed that New Hampshire has banned chemtrails, HB 1700-FN died in committee on January 31, 2024.

    • @victorvastel8028
      @victorvastel8028 10 місяців тому +2

      "See?! They even openly admit they're knowingly allowing it." incoming.

    • @guillermoelnino
      @guillermoelnino 9 місяців тому

      How come anyone would need a law for something that supposedly doesn't exist?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 9 місяців тому +1

      @@guillermoelninoBecause people like you exist and try to pass bills for things that don’t exist. And then you get laughed at and your bill gets rejected for lack of evidence. Pretty simple concept.

  • @asiseeit6304
    @asiseeit6304 4 роки тому +10

    I have observed on many occasions, jets with 'chem trail' flying in irregular flight paths. This happens a lot over the Med, the jets fly towards Morrocco and turn hard left, then left again. Some seem to go up and down the coastline. Change that to a lot seem to go up and down the coastline. If you are on a jet and fly towards sparsely populated ares in the north of Spain, hey presto, not a trail in sight. hmmm. And no, they do not come in to land at local airports, Malaga included. The flight plans for Malaga are various but do not include high altitude and flying off into the blue. Maybe they get Malaga and Alicante airports mixed up on a regular occurance, hey, that must be the answer.

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 4 роки тому +3

      The whole mystery of the jets not landing on local airports leaving contrails is, they are just flying over at their cruising altitude - that is where contrails are being formed. Those landing locally are descending already and can't leave contrails in the lower altitude. Elementary, dear Watson :-).
      As for the patterns and turns - there are quite a few frequented airways in that area. In the complicated political geography straight flightpaths between A and B are not always possible. Sticking to the corridors may be virtually matter of life and death. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Air_Lines_Flight_007 . We are not always flying friendly air.

    • @msheart2
      @msheart2 10 місяців тому

      That's because the weather is modified globally which is ruining the climate
      To search.
      " Saudi Arabia launches cloud-seeding programme to increase rainfall"
      [ NGulf National News]
      "Weather Program Office [NOAA] Weather Modification."
      " Weather and Climate Modification - National Science Foundation [NSF]"
      " NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL OD-14 CUMULUS CLOUDS AND THEIR MODIFICATION
      " S.3383 (94th): National Weather Modification Policy Act Introduced: May 5, 1976
      "Owning the Weather"
      "Project Popeye"
      " Project Cumulus "
      "PROJECT WOODPECKER"
      " Project Lucy"
      " Hurricane and tornado control device "
      "ATMOSPHERIC HEATING AS A RESEARCH TOOL confex"
      "China's radical $168 million weather control system revealed: '
      "China is massively expanding its weather-modification program, saying it will be able to cover half the country in artificial rain and snow by 2025"
      " Greening a Saudi Arabian Desert"
      " China plans to use chemicals to generate rain to protect its grain harvest
      August 21, 2022 "
      " WEATHER MODIFICATION INC"
      'Climate engineering by mimicking natural dust climate control: the iron salt aerosol method'
      " H.R.4586 - Geoengineering Research Evaluation Act of 2017 "
      "Preliminary Experimental Evaluation of Snomax (TM) Snow Inducer, Nucleus Pseudomonas syringae, as an Artificial Ice for Weather Modification" 1989
      "Silica aerogel nanopowder. What geoengineers 'plan' on putting into the atmosphere and environment. "
      " Weather Modification Using Electromagnetic Beams Common Knowledge at Aquiess,Inc"

    • @msheart2
      @msheart2 10 місяців тому

      @@curiouscat8457 CONtrails said the pussy

  • @siamlawma
    @siamlawma 5 років тому +46

    Joe you missed smoke machines installed on aircraft which are used in airshows

    • @jg3000
      @jg3000 5 років тому +2

      Those actually spray a chemical into the exhaust. I know it used to be paraffin oil. Not sure what it is now.

    • @trainzguy2472
      @trainzguy2472 5 років тому +1

      @@jg3000 Same stuff as smoke machines that you see at parties. It's some sort of liquid that gets vaporized into smoke. Kinda like a vape but without the nicotine and it smells really bad.

    • @ΑΡΗΣΚΟΡΝΑΡΑΚΗΣ
      @ΑΡΗΣΚΟΡΝΑΡΑΚΗΣ 5 років тому

      @@trainzguy2472 glycol?

    • @cameronmchugh4153
      @cameronmchugh4153 5 років тому +3

      @@jg3000 ohhhhhh. So the oil just like burns, turning into a white smoke? I never knew how they sprayed smoke out of the jets at air shows.

    • @egga3675
      @egga3675 4 роки тому

      @@cameronmchugh4153 it's kerosene mixed with a little bit of chemical, and then burnt to produce coloured smoke.

  • @maevebaksa
    @maevebaksa 7 років тому +23

    When I was young I thought that the white stuff coming out of the engines were how clouds were made. Actually.

    • @Pumpped
      @Pumpped 6 років тому +7

      It is how clouds are made... toxic ones.

    • @gnostaoticanarchangautand
      @gnostaoticanarchangautand 6 років тому +1

      Pumpped THEY BE SPRAYING HYDRIC ACID

    • @gammondog
      @gammondog 5 років тому +4

      They do form into cirrus clouds. After all, clouds are made of condensed water droplets. Fog is a cloud that’s at ground level. So you can walk through a cloud. No aircraft is necessary.

    • @pgnandt
      @pgnandt 4 роки тому +1

      Hope your science teacher gave you an A. Yes, contrails and clouds are indeed condensed water.

  • @fixplaats6247
    @fixplaats6247 2 місяці тому +3

    whatever people say, I will always miss the dark blue beautiful clouded skies...

    • @Ben-mk9ig
      @Ben-mk9ig 2 місяці тому +3

      Too bad you don't live where I do. Most of September we've had nothing _but_ deep blue skies.

    • @guillermoelnino
      @guillermoelnino 2 місяці тому

      @@Ben-mk9ig california I'm guessing. No normal person thinks like y ou.

  • @SlyartMehc
    @SlyartMehc 4 роки тому +25

    Merry Chemtrails and Happy new Sky

  • @johncatty6560
    @johncatty6560 2 роки тому +5

    LOL, Keith once again posted a comment hoping that other users would comment and then he'd just delete his and all other comments would vanish as well. He is so predictable.
    Edit: he blatanly lies because he claims my name is "Derek". That is not my name. That name is not even common in the coutry I live.
    He makes up stories to fight his own war against the truth and facts. I don't know what he gains out of it...

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 2 роки тому

      @Elyjah Stark "What absolute non sense is this?"
      Na, der wievielte Account ist das mittlerweile? Es ist lustig, zu lesen, dass Keith mal zur Abwechslung einen Nutzernamen hat, in dem sein richtiger Name enthalten ist. Ist Ihr Account Psyop Slayer endlich gelöscht worden?
      "No one even cared to comment on this."
      Lügner. *Sie* hat der Kommentar gewurmt und getriggert :D
      "Chemtrails are documented factually in court cases"
      Und eine weitere Lüge.
      "that are being paid out due to the damage Agent Orange Chemtrails have done"
      Wissen Sie immer noch nicht, wofür "Chemtrails" stehen? Armer Wicht...
      "do you even history?"
      Mein Englisch ist nicht besonders gut. Aber selbst ich weiß, dass die Frage falsch ist. Und die Frage sollten Sie sich selbst stellen, da Sie die Geschichte des Chemtrail-Märchens offenbar nicht kennen.
      "Do you even facts?"
      Noch so 'ne schwachsinnige Frage. Wie wäre es denn mal mit dem Verwenden von Verben? Offenbar haben Sie nicht nur in Physik, Mathe, Bio und Chemie geschlafen sondern auch im Englischunterricht. Das Problem mit den Fakten haben Sie.
      "Elyjah, this is not working"
      Falscher Name. Aber ich verstehe, dass jemand, der mehrere Accounts hat, auch der Paranoia verfällt, dass andere Nutzer ebenfalls mehrere Accounts haben. Und nun: tschööööö!

  • @barbarafels7956
    @barbarafels7956 Рік тому +5

    Hello, I live in south-west France, I saw this morning 5 little planes passing, (each leaving one "trail", and there were already other trails in the sky....) they were going in the same direction, one after the other during 11 minutes (i filmed them), is it possible that planes pass so "close", every 2 or 3 minutes ? Thank you !

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Рік тому +3

      Look at the departures/arrivals board at some major airport and you have the answer - well, almost, the cargo traffic will not be there.
      The minimal horizontal distance between planes at the same altitudes given by the separation rules is about 9 km in the general controlled airspace, meaning, you can see planes flying by the usual cruising speed separated by only just over 30 seconds. Close to airports (terminal airspace) it drops almost to a half.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 Рік тому +1

      You can also find the information on ADS-B tracking sites like FR-24.

    • @onefourwhisky
      @onefourwhisky Рік тому

      ua-cam.com/video/1aRt7_E5AuM/v-deo.html

    • @barbarafels7956
      @barbarafels7956 Рік тому

      @@curiouscat8457 ok thanks but I live near the mountains,.....

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 Рік тому +1

      @@barbarafels7956 What does it change?

  • @bendeleted9155
    @bendeleted9155 7 місяців тому +4

    Let's be clear here about what you are most likely seeing. All aircraft, whether jet turbine or recip will contrail between certain flight levels, based on conditions. If you consider that the whole airmass is moving, what may look like cross-hatching sweeps of "chem trails" is usually just departures and arrivals into the airport about 100-200 miles away from you. An aircraft, especially coming off an air route for arrival past the same land-based navigation aids into the airport pattern a few minutes apart will look like very deliberate pattern of spraying to some, but spraying "chemicals" at 20,000ft plus makes little sense. When spraying chemicals for mosquito control, they spray from about 500 feet, and it looks nothing like contrails. You're ALWAYS going to see these when conditions exist for it, so you may want to look up "cloud seeding methods" or "mosquito vector control spraying methods" or "mass administration thorazine" to see the difference.

    • @mariogallo6891
      @mariogallo6891 5 місяців тому +1

      Here in Australia I have watched contrails and they are normally at a very high altitude. I have witnessed chemical trails over the suburban areas where one side of the plane runs out before the other side and I have watched them do it at night they were not around when I was a kid only contrails there is a huge difference

    • @MyYT62
      @MyYT62 5 місяців тому +1

      There are more pilots speaking out now about the chemicals, the truth always gets out eventually because thankfully their are people who actually have morals and a conscience 🙏🏻

    • @mariogallo6891
      @mariogallo6891 5 місяців тому

      @@MyYT62 that is very true 🙏

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 5 місяців тому

      @@MyYT62 Could you list off any of those alleged pilots with evidence for their claims? No one has ever been able to back up that claim.

  • @PAVANWORLDWIDE
    @PAVANWORLDWIDE 7 років тому +32

    Captain Joe..greetings.
    Hope that you will make a video on ILS and VOR navigation in near future.
    You are the best...!
    Another great video;)

    • @reeseknittle3225
      @reeseknittle3225 7 років тому +1

      PAV 2001 Does anyone know what 3 models Joe has on his wall behind him? They're beautiful!

    • @ReLax232
      @ReLax232 7 років тому +1

      I think its (from top to bottom) 757, A320, 737. But I'm not 100% sure

    • @PAVANWORLDWIDE
      @PAVANWORLDWIDE 7 років тому +1

      I think(the 2nd and 3rd) one are both A320's..

    • @reeseknittle3225
      @reeseknittle3225 7 років тому

      ReLax232 Yes thank you very much and you are correct by the way. I went crazy and tried to find the models and had pretty good luck!

    • @reeseknittle3225
      @reeseknittle3225 7 років тому +1

      PAV 2001 Thanks for helping, One is an A320 and the other a 737-800!

  • @daemn42
    @daemn42 7 років тому +18

    The key thing you failed to mention about contrails is that the second biggest byproduct of combustion is water vapor. In fact a little more water vapor is produced by weight than the original fuel itself (plus several times as much CO2 by weight). It is the newly produced hot water vapor rapidly cooling that produces the visible cloud behind the aircraft engine. And yes one of the exhaust gasses that your body produces through natural metabolic processes is also warm water vapor which condenses into a visible cloud when you breath out into cold higher humidity air.
    BTW the "wing tip vortices" you showed first were really coming off the ends of the flaps not the tips of the wings. Anywhere there is a very sharp transition between a region of high lift, and an area of less or zero lift, it creates a swirling vortex with a low pressure area in the middle of it. When air is already saturated with water vapor (slightly less than 100% humidity) and you lower the pressure, the water vapor condenses out into a visible cloud. During landing with the flaps down producing enormous lift, the vortex is formed off the end of the lowered flaps.

    • @TheHailstorm77
      @TheHailstorm77 2 роки тому

      The key thing this fraud Captain Joe is not a real captain 👨‍✈️ or he doesn’t have time like you and I to post on UA-cam and delete comments. He’s a poser trying to post one sided argument but there is actual evidence and facts that Chemtrails exist. Here it is:
      ua-cam.com/video/bKs16Al52r4/v-deo.html

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +4

      @@TheHailstorm77 If he is a fraud, how are there numerous videos of him flying his air Berlin and cargolux planes? If you spent less time on your ad hominem fallacy and more time actually finding evidence for the chemtrail hoax, you wouldn’t continue to embarrass yourself on every thread. Also, still loving the spamming of the cloud seeding video that disproves the chemtrail hoax right in the video. 😂

    • @TheHailstorm77
      @TheHailstorm77 2 роки тому

      Here is facts about chemtrail. DONT mind the GHEIBOY flaming flamingo Elyjah Stark’s. He’s annoying. I just ignore him like a girlscout trying to sell me cookies:
      ua-cam.com/video/qRuaR_O2t-4/v-deo.html

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +4

      @@TheHailstorm77 That’s a video of Russell brand talking about cloud seeding and hypothetical SAI research. Both of which aren’t a secret or a conspiracy. And both of which are irrelevant to the chemtrail theory. And your insults are only backfiring on you.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +4

      @@TheHailstorm77 Oh are you using a new profile now? Did your other one get in trouble? 😂😂 Still unable to find evidence for the chemtrail theory?

  • @Bilal-gx8yb
    @Bilal-gx8yb 3 роки тому +37

    Chemtrails over the country club

    • @mikeharris8960
      @mikeharris8960 3 роки тому +1

      Who are you.....exhaust is exhaust. Idiot

    • @dennistheonlysolution5330
      @dennistheonlysolution5330 3 роки тому

      There's videos of planes with huge tanks filled n tipped in to sky

    • @kevinkovarik1330
      @kevinkovarik1330 3 роки тому

      I have personally seen over 300 government documents from Congress, CIA , I have seen international Global governence reports , I have seen patents for this technology Solar Radiation Management or Stratospheric Aerosol Injection. Past CIA director Brennan and Obama's chief science administrator have stated on record that Solar Radiation Management and Stratospheric Aerosol Injection have both gotten there interest in what they can use to mitigate Global Warming. Listen to David Kieth lead Geoengineer from Harvard or Ken Caldier from Stanford talk about what Solar Radiation Management will look like if we choose to do it. It is exactly what is happening now in our skies. Recently geoengineeringwatch.org went up in a plane just like NOAA uses to get tests from very high altitude 40,000 feet of what is in these so called persistent contrails. The results are off the charts of Aluminum, Barium and Strontium and other things . This is exactly what the geoengineers say that they will use. I've seen blood samples from special labs that look for nanoparticles same thing. Soil samples Rain Water and snow samples. If this was a court of law the people responsible would be found guilty. Here's a question, why do employees of NOAA and National Weather Service have to sign federal gag orders. Because they are hiding something about what is going on about the climate.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 3 роки тому +2

      @@kevinkovarik1330 “I have personally seen over 300 government documents” .... provide just 1 relevant to any visible Chemtrails in the sky.
      “I have seen patents for this technology solar radiation management and stratospheric aerosol injection” ... because both of those are real fields of research. They just have nothing to do with any visible trails in the sky and are not currently being deployed due to a number of geopolitical, physical, and economical limitations.
      “CIA director John Brennan” Again referring to SRM and SAI in the future tense and the potential geopolitical ramifications such a program would have.
      “Listen to David Keith or Ken Caldeir talk about SRM” ... because they are the lead researchers. Still nothing to do with any currently visible trails in the sky.
      “What SRM will look like if we choose to do it” ... again future tense and you can listen to them talking about why it wouldn’t leave persistent trails in the sky that have the opposite effect of what is desired.
      “It is exactly what is happening now in our skies” ... except it’s not. The proposal thus far is to use sulfur compounds that are smaller than the visible wavelength of light (you wouldn’t see them) released from 65k feet (no plane can carry a payload that high) between the latitudes of 30 north and 30 south to utilize wind circulation currents that would create the max effect of reflecting some wavelengths of the sun and then allow for trapped wavelengths to escape. Nothing to do with clustered visible trails randomly arrayed around the globe behind airplanes, mostly commercial.
      “Recently “Dane Wigington” went up in a plane just like NOAA uses to get tests from very high altitude.....The results are off the charts of aluminum barium and strontium”.... he hasn’t released his results yet. He keeps delaying because the minute he does he knows he will be exposed for a fraud again. He’s been advertising his film like crazy for months now and it never seems to come out. He just keeps asking for more donations. Weird, almost like he’s a proven con artist. If you have his results, you’re more than welcome to post them along with his sampling methodology.
      “This is exactly what the geoengineers say they will use” ... except, again, no it’s not. They are researching sulfur compounds like sulfur dioxide and sulfuric acid, similar to volcanic eruptions, which have a similar impact. Barium, strontium, and aluminum violently react with oxygen in various colors, which is why they are used in fireworks.
      “I’ve seen blood samples” the ones from Arizona that all had normal levels? Some were slightly elevated and many were below normal?
      “Soil samples rain water and snow samples” ... like the ones from Mount Shasta where they tested snow in July that was covered in dust and smoke from the nearby wildfire? Or the mud sample compared to drinking water? Or the rain water where they claim there should be no elements measured, forgetting that dust is 8 percent aluminum in average and acts as nucleation for rain drops and gets absorbed by the rain drops as they fall? Or the air sample tests where they forgot to factor back in the volume of air and only measured the particulate ratio in the dust? All of the samples show normal levels for what are being tested once you find out what was actually being tested and ignore the deceptive limits they compare them to that are irrelevant to what is being sampled.
      “If there was a court of law they would be found guilty” ... that was already tried multiple times. They were laughed out of court for not having any evidence. That’s generally what happens when you try to present a smoke screen to scientifically literate individuals who critically think through information instead of just gullibly believing it.
      “Why do employees of NOAA and NWS have to sign federal gag orders” ... they don’t in any relevant way to trails in the sky. They have to do with collective bargaining between the union and early release of reports. Just another smoke screen by Dane.
      “Because they are hiding something about what is going on with the climate” ... no because they are protecting the integrity of their reports until they have been thoroughly reviewed.

    • @danieldoneski9666
      @danieldoneski9666 3 роки тому

      Its illegal to alter the environment but globalists still doing it

  • @twistedoak69
    @twistedoak69 11 місяців тому +1

    is this guy saying that Stratospheric aerosols for use in SRM don't exist?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 11 місяців тому +3

      And this parroted false equivalence fallacy is even more irrelevant to the subject of this video. Try researching any of the branches of research entailing SRM

  • @chemicalbrucey157
    @chemicalbrucey157 4 роки тому +24

    I mean, if aircraft were spraying chemicals into the air, they would require tanks of said chemical..... That tank would need filling by somebody, that would mean at least 1 person at every single airport and airstrip on the planet would know about the chemicals on a plane.... How come not a single one of them has come forward with solid evidence?

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 4 роки тому +12

      It depends on who you ask. Some of the chemtrail believers claim that it is already added to the fuel. But still they cannot explain why the fully loaded B747 fire fighting aircraft can only cover a stretch of approx. 5 miles and the white trails can span 60 miles and beyond.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 4 роки тому +13

      John Catty Yes, they have every possible excuse for how it MIGHT get onboard. So, same argument. How does it get into the fuel unnoticed? Do Aluminum, Barium and Strontium trucks drive into refineries quietly at night and nobody notices? Do they kill the employee who adds it each time they get a shipment in? These are the same people who probably can’t sleep because there is a monster under their bed. They can’t even explain what form these alleged chemicals are in. The quantity added. The effect of said chemicals......
      It’s like dealing with children.

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 4 роки тому +16

      @@oscarb9139 "It’s like dealing with children."
      You can teach children and convince them by conducting experiments. Chemrail believers and Flat Earthers will not participate in experiments that will destroy their opinion. Hence, they are worse than children.

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 4 роки тому +8

      John Catty Very good point.

    • @HerbisRGreen
      @HerbisRGreen 4 роки тому +13

      ALUMINUM DUST FROM GEOENGINEERING FUELING SUPER WILDFIRES ACCORDING
      A retired USAF brigadier general, Gen. Charles Jones, has been quoted from a public source as stating, “These white aircraft spraying trails are the result of scientifically verifiable spraying of aluminum particles and other toxic heavy metals, polymers and chemicals.”
      “Millions of tons of aluminum and barium are being sprayed almost daily across the U.S., stated Mills, a former naval officer and UCLA graduate. “Just sprinkle aluminum or barium dust on a fire and see what happens. It’s near explosive. When wildfires break out, the aluminum/barium dust results in levels of fire intensity so great as to cause firefighters to coin a new term, "Firenadoes" he said. The entire U.S., in addition to various other NATO countries, are being sprayed.”
      "In Calif2el, a USDA biologist tested and found elevated levels of aluminum in water and soil samples of 4,610 parts per million which is 25,000 times the safe guidelines of the World Health Organization."
      "No one can argue, however, the wildfires’ newfound ferocity or the millions of tons of aluminum/barium nanodust which have appeared, which is killing vegetation and causing illness and death."
      www.redpillinfowar.com/2019/11/30/aluminum-dust-from-geoengineering-fueling-super-wildfires-according-to-author-re-blog/

  • @user-ok1he9ll2s
    @user-ok1he9ll2s 6 років тому +10

    That chemtrail switch 😂😂

  • @N75911_
    @N75911_ 6 років тому +10

    If chemtrails scare the conspiracy theorists, then imagine how they would react to the silent, undetectable method ACTUALLY used for deploying chemical weapons.

    • @ABJ20
      @ABJ20 2 роки тому +4

      Cmon link it then

    • @TheHailstorm77
      @TheHailstorm77 2 роки тому +2

      Don’t need to link anything. Ever heard of Agent Orange used during the Vietnam War? You don’t think that’s chemtrail? 😂

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +3

      @@TheHailstorm77 You mean the low altitude herbicidal defoliant that doesn’t leave a persistent trail that spreads and instead exhausts the entire payload in a matter of minutes? Do you even know what the chemtrail theory is?

    • @andrewcarson6925
      @andrewcarson6925 2 роки тому

      WE'RE NOT CONSPIRACY THEORISTS EVERYTHING WE SAID IS HAPPENING YALL STAY BRAINWASHED

    • @ABJ20
      @ABJ20 2 роки тому +1

      @@andrewcarson6925 just wait, just wait

  • @Outdoorshuntingshooting
    @Outdoorshuntingshooting 9 місяців тому +7

    Lmfao its moisture in the air. There is a chemical involved, h2o.

    • @donmiller2885
      @donmiller2885 8 місяців тому

      Yeah moisture and chemicals like aluminum. Been proven old news. You are just embarrassing yourself.

  • @mrzorg
    @mrzorg 4 роки тому +10

    If you would, please explain how some of these planes exhibit normal contrails, that do not last long behind the jet, vs the ones that hang around for hours after the plane goes by? Some days, they seem normal contrails, some days, they linger, and can even be seen by GOES weather satellites. Why do some linger, and others don't? Cheers!

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 4 роки тому +4

      MrZorg ....relative humidity. Well, that was easy. Any other questions?
      Do you know much about water behavior in the atmosphere and why and when it condenses or evaporates/sublimates?

    • @Taanstafl12
      @Taanstafl12 4 роки тому +2

      People are so simple minded. They think that just because benign contrails exist that LITERALLY every plane is just leaving behind contrails without even considering the possibility of a smaller sub-group of planes actively spraying in a manner closely resembling contrails. Are commercial airline pilots spraying anything? No. Are a smaller group of unmarked planes spraying? Absolutely. Try again..
      ua-cam.com/video/XTJi6dxlbPM/v-deo.html

    • @timleger6979
      @timleger6979 4 роки тому +3

      They always seem to be sprayed on nice sunny day then the suns gone.

    • @mta1
      @mta1 Рік тому

      ​@@elyjahstarkno way because the trails can appear on the same day/altitude and look different. What are you trying to proof? Just this am in BXL noticed the difference. It is very disturning that they create foggy skies and hide the sun!

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark Рік тому

      @@mta1 So are you under the impression that atmospheric conditions are homogenous throughout the sky at all times of day? Because that’s what you just claimed. It’s entirely possible and very common to have varying conditions at varying altitudes that can change at any point across the sky. Hence why you can see planes leaving no contrails, short contrails, and varying levels of persistence, all at the same time. Do partly cloudy skies also confuse you?

  • @charlesroblox9321
    @charlesroblox9321 5 років тому +9

    When i was a kid when i saw this omg i think a plane just crashed

    • @kenjboyd6233
      @kenjboyd6233 4 роки тому

      Charles, that's because sometimes they're dumping so much poison on us it looks like they've been hit in the rear with a surface-to-air missile. But we're not all as stupid as they think!

    • @oneskydog4401
      @oneskydog4401 4 роки тому +1

      @Ken J Boyd Wow you are really afraid of the microscopic creatures of the earth, remember life is fatal.

  • @Oscar.Carmona
    @Oscar.Carmona 2 роки тому +7

    Kristen Meghan, Airforce Chemical expert, did a research to De-bunk this... she ended up being a believer. It changed everything she stood for. Look her up and tell me what you think

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 2 роки тому +7

      As far as I could find out, she is far from being an "expert". She was in charge of handling dangerous chemicals at an airbase - nothing to do with chemtrails - and crossed wires with her superiors when she found some shortcuts with disposal of some dangerous substances. Being grossly disgruntled, she went on a warpath with the Air Force and and in her zeal she ventured into stuff she didn't have the foggiest about...
      Where are any verifiable facts about chemtrails she presented? Please, show me. I am waiting.

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 2 роки тому +5

      Have not checked her social media accounts in 2021 and 2022. BUT: when I checked in late 2020 she had not mentioned anything related to this topic for at least two years. It seems that this topic did not generate any money for her any more.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 2 роки тому +7

      “I wasn't a whistleblower in regards to chemtrails. It was a completely different situation about overexposures to carcinogens on base they wanted to keep quiet.” - Kristen Meghan, January 25th, 2013
      Pretty much says it all, and in her own words.

    • @msheart2
      @msheart2 10 місяців тому

      To research if you're so inclined.
      " Saudi Arabia launches cloud-seeding programme to increase rainfall"
      [ NGulf National News]
      "Weather Program Office [NOAA] Weather Modification."
      " Weather and Climate Modification - National Science Foundation [NSF]"
      " NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL OD-14 CUMULUS CLOUDS AND THEIR MODIFICATION
      " S.3383 (94th): National Weather Modification Policy Act Introduced: May 5, 1976
      "Owning the Weather"
      "Project Popeye"
      " Project Cumulus "
      "PROJECT WOODPECKER"
      " Project Lucy"
      " Hurricane and tornado control device "
      "ATMOSPHERIC HEATING AS A RESEARCH TOOL confex"
      "China's radical $168 million weather control system revealed: '
      "China is massively expanding its weather-modification program, saying it will be able to cover half the country in artificial rain and snow by 2025"
      " Greening a Saudi Arabian Desert"
      " China plans to use chemicals to generate rain to protect its grain harvest
      August 21, 2022 "
      " WEATHER MODIFICATION INC"
      'Climate engineering by mimicking natural dust climate control: the iron salt aerosol method'
      " H.R.4586 - Geoengineering Research Evaluation Act of 2017 "
      "Preliminary Experimental Evaluation of Snomax (TM) Snow Inducer, Nucleus Pseudomonas syringae, as an Artificial Ice for Weather Modification" 1989
      "Silica aerogel nanopowder. What geoengineers 'plan' on putting into the atmosphere and environment. "
      " Weather Modification Using Electromagnetic Beams Common Knowledge at Aquiess,Inc"

  • @GJB22
    @GJB22 Місяць тому +1

    Oh no, not my plane....LOL. we are not stupid, we know it's not your plane. It's other planes that are flown by others.

  • @dr.ramondetorres4838
    @dr.ramondetorres4838 5 років тому +5

    I've seen photos of spray nozzles on planes, and some in-flight spraying, just like a crop-dusting plane. Also, if contrails depend on the weather, please tell me why, in cold weather, I don't leave a contrail from my house down the block that I can turn and look at as it just hangs there forming clouds? I've seen inside photos of what appear to be regular planes yet the inside is filled with large containers that look like chemical vats.

    • @yassassin6425
      @yassassin6425 5 років тому +1

      "I've seen photos of spray nozzles on planes, and some in-flight spraying"
      I've no doubt. Present them. I'll tell you what they are.
      "Also, if contrails depend on the weather, please tell me why, in cold weather, I don't leave a contrail from my house down the block that I can turn and look at as it just hangs there forming clouds?"
      You'll find that the explanation may well lie in the fact that the exhalation from your lungs is not equivalent or analogous to a large turbofan jet engine rated up to 115,000 lbs of thrust, continually burning a hydrocarbon fuel at 1,100°C, emitting a stream of 500°C superheated exhaust in an ambient ice saturated environment < -60°C whilst travelling in excess of 500 knots.
      "I've seen inside photos of what appear to be regular planes yet the inside is filled with large containers that look like chemical vats."
      They didn't by any chance bear any resemblance to these did they?
      ua-cam.com/video/IxMSoxzYhG8/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/Oz1RH6gqQ8s/v-deo.html
      www.boeing.com/company/about-bca/washington/737max-flight-test-prepare-02-12-18.page
      www.wired.com/2010/02/peek-inside-boeing-747-8/
      www.jetphotos.com/photo/5636164/24
      www.jetphotos.com/photo/6188301
      Well who'd have thought?

    • @TheHailstorm77
      @TheHailstorm77 2 роки тому

      Maybe you should use better example like agent orange that was used during Vietnam War. Oh but the government would still lie and misdirect people into think chemtrails are contrails when cloud seeding and SAI ( Stratospheric Aersol Injection) is another Chemtrail used.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +1

      @@TheHailstorm77 How are those both “better examples”? One is a low altitude defoliant used during the Vietnam war that didn’t leave a long persistent trail and emptied its payload in a matter of minutes. The other is a hypothetical research into the plausibility of releasing invisible aerosols into the sky at 65,000 feet and has nothing to do with currently visible persistent trails behind airliners at half that altitude.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark Рік тому

      @@snow_tacknives2024 oh look, you’re now trolling in new threads admitting your willful ignorance. It is indeed entertaining watching you desperately scramble around unable to defend your beliefs and get emotionally triggered 😂 why do you let this get to you?

  • @onefourwhisky
    @onefourwhisky 3 роки тому +7

    ladies and gentlemen we have a brand-new childish Troll going by the name of "Reggie Spinks" (for now) he just opened his new sock puppet account to day joined Nov 30, 2021

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 3 роки тому +4

      That one was swiftly deleted. Now he has magnus Maximus

    • @magnusmaximus9102
      @magnusmaximus9102 3 роки тому +1

      @@elyjahstark why are you so weak chrissy? We're you scared you couldn't lie about not having a real job? F loser

    • @magnusmaximus9102
      @magnusmaximus9102 3 роки тому +1

      @@elyjahstark 😄😁😆😅🤣

    • @oscarb9139
      @oscarb9139 3 роки тому +2

      @@elyjahstark Just minutes ago he was posting under that profile.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 3 роки тому +3

      @@oscarb9139 somehow they allowed it back after it was taken down for two days. Now the other one appears to have been deleted. “Maximus”

  • @albertareal6222
    @albertareal6222 3 роки тому +6

    What about cloud seeding ?
    - edited - can you please produce a video specifically on Cloud Seeding ?

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 3 роки тому +6

      What about it? Cloud seeding doesn’t involve any visible trails.

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 3 роки тому +4

      Cloud seeding is often parroted as a false equivalence to the 'chemtrail' hoax, but it has nothing to do with the hoax.

    • @albertareal6222
      @albertareal6222 3 роки тому

      @@elyjahstark there’s several ways or methods to cloud seed.
      In passenger planes there’s different re-configurations with pictures circulating some suggest or claim nefarious reasons. These previous passenger planes re-purposed with tanks could likely be used for weather modification and or possibly as water bombers such as the normally or typical used water bombers don’t actually have a belly full of water but simply fill small tanks inside the water bomber suggesting any commercial aircraft could easily be converted for a role as a water bomber, however pictures of these could also have some suggest nefarious reasons.

    • @albertareal6222
      @albertareal6222 3 роки тому +1

      @@elyjahstark I love to use Pilot Joes videos to debunk chemtrail conspiracy theorists.

    • @albertareal6222
      @albertareal6222 3 роки тому

      @@siouxperb5570 absolutely and exactly why I’d love to see a video by Pilot Joe specifically on Cloud Seeding.
      Another method to cloud seed is also by using Anti-Aircraft Artillery at least in some smaller south Asian countries.

  • @robertros74
    @robertros74 9 місяців тому

    Zwróćcie uwagę na to że opryski zaczynają się zawsze od wschodu słońca i się przesuwają ku zachodowi żeby przykryć zjawiska towarzyszące wschodowi slonca

  • @Ovijz
    @Ovijz Рік тому +14

    U can lie at the best dear captain ✈️

  • @robertcoia130
    @robertcoia130 5 років тому +12

    Contrails disappear shortly after the plane disappears from sight, chemtrails remain long after the plane passes, and gradually spread out across the the sky. BIG difference...

    • @yassassin6425
      @yassassin6425 5 років тому +1

      "Contrails disappear shortly after the plane disappears from sight"
      Explain why, detailing the physical laws and processes that determine this.
      "chemtrails remain long after the plane passes, and gradually spread out across the the sky."
      And what of persistent spreading contrails that have been observed, documented, recorded and studied since the early advent of powered flight?

    • @siouxperb5570
      @siouxperb5570 5 років тому +1

      "Contrails disappear shortly after the plane disappears from sight"
      Since when? Did the laws of physics recently change?

    • @johncatty6560
      @johncatty6560 5 років тому +1

      Please explain why clouds and fog do not vanish immediately.

    • @mikep9604
      @mikep9604 5 років тому

      Persistent contrails were a common sight already in 1940s:
      secure.i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/03440/contrail_chaos_3440631b.jpg

    • @HenryLeaf
      @HenryLeaf 5 років тому

      ua-cam.com/video/X72uACIN_00/v-deo.html

  • @JohPetersen
    @JohPetersen 2 роки тому +5

    As many of the comments shows, your answers are not sufficient, I also have to ask why chem-trails daily, especially in the summer stay in the sky for hours and after finally “disappearing making strange elongated cloud formations. I have never in my 72- year old life seen something like it. This summer, when the weather was warmest, slowly about midday the sky turned from bright blue to grey after chemtrails had made its mark across the board?? In sum, you have deftly sidestepped these essential questions. Denmark 🇩🇰

    • @curiouscat8457
      @curiouscat8457 2 роки тому +4

      What do you expect from a 5 minutes video? Comprehensive answers to your questions could easily cover a few pages in atmospheric science and meteorology textbooks.
      Basic explanation, however, you will find repeated over and over in the comments. Just browse thru them.
      As for "not seeing it before" - probably because you never looked at the sky hard enough before some clown on the Internet told you to look for "chemtrails". The hoax popped up some 15(?) years ago.

    • @JohPetersen
      @JohPetersen 2 роки тому +1

      @@curiouscat8457 courius, I don’t expect anything of value from a superficial video, that’s why I ask again. “not looking in the sky “hard enough”, what do you mean? First of all, I have all my life looked at the sky with joy, second, should I have a x-ray look to be convinced nothing odd about it? If you are linguistically intelligent enough to give a deeper, more believable explanation I would receive with gratitude . Your grumpy comment of a serious issue, make me even more suspicious. Prove you have more knowledge than appears to convince me please.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +3

      @@JohPetersen Funny then that these trails were documented over and around Denmark in the Second World War.

    • @JohPetersen
      @JohPetersen 2 роки тому +1

      @@elyjahstark Elyjah, even that it’s documented as you claim in ww2 is something to think about. What I think is even more odd is that the leftists and woke community is very much concerned about climate change, but don’t bother what’s in the air, strange isn’t it? And furthermore they are very concerned about the pollution but not about the pollution in foods, not to mention the mental pollution, odd don’t you think? They don’t care about solar cells and windmills covering the whole landscape and make mental disturbances as you can’t see the nature anymore, even that they have no idea how mush trash and oil etc. it takes to produce it, they also throw trash on the street just because they see them selves as rebellions, don’t you think their behavior against- and anxiety for so called climate change is created out of climate-mongering by the elites? This goes so much deeper. Too many people these days are so bad educated and bad aware of anything, mislead, misinformed and that’s what concerns me the most. Please do your studies and be honest. Young people must stand up and be more aware of things, not just following social media, which is pure poison to their mental conditions. Pollution is more than chemtrails

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +4

      @@JohPetersen why would that be strange and why would “they” be concerned about water in the sky? Please do your studies and be honest and tell me what other chemical could be vaporized as it releases the plane, then quickly condense in the ambient conditions, and then magically grow in condensed mass as it persists and spreads for hundreds of miles. And which plane do you claim has the requisite payload capacity to pull off that feat?

  • @thelusogerman3021
    @thelusogerman3021 7 років тому +35

    TINFOIL HAT INTENSIFIES

    • @TheDankEngineer
      @TheDankEngineer 6 років тому

      👌😂💯💯💯👌👌👌👌👌

  • @ussling
    @ussling 6 років тому +9

    I learned in ground school last century that these were contrails produced by the hot, moist exhaust from engines. Piston engines also produced them. Watch high-flying B17s in any WW2 movie, or UA-cam. If I count one contrail from a high, fast moving aircraft, it could possibly be an F-16. Two contrails from a fast moving aircraft could be an F-15, F-18, or a Gulfstream-type. Two or more contrails from an aircraft that is slower moving, I think it to be an airliner.
    OK, so I count contrails. Everyone needs a hobby.

    • @TheHailstorm77
      @TheHailstorm77 2 роки тому

      Don’t forget about Vietnam War when agent orange was used and is a Chem trail.

    • @ussling
      @ussling 2 роки тому +2

      @@TheHailstorm77 Nice try, but no ding of the bell.
      Agent orange was a defoliant used for deforestation so the North Vietnamese soldiers would have no cover under which to hide and destroy their food crops.
      It could do nasty things to anyone exposed to it.
      Agent orange was not a chem trail. It was dispensed from tanks mounted on a C-123 turboprop aircraft, not unlike how modern crop dusters spray herbicide in fields.

    • @TheHailstorm77
      @TheHailstorm77 2 роки тому

      @@ussling nice try but wrong! Look at the Vietnam War videos. Chem trail means chemical trail! That’s the definition of it. Any chemical leaving chemicals dispersed from planes and leaving plumes of chemical behind is chemtrail! Period! Go Wikipedia it.
      Maybe you should use better example like agent orange that was used during Vietnam War. Oh but the government would still lie and misdirect people into think chemtrails are contrails when cloud seeding and SAI ( Stratospheric Aersol Injection) is another Chemtrail used.

    • @TheHailstorm77
      @TheHailstorm77 2 роки тому +1

      @@ussling “a visible trail left in the sky by an aircraft and believed by some to consist of chemical or biological agents released as part of a covert operation.” That is from online source that defines chemtrail.

    • @elyjahstark
      @elyjahstark 2 роки тому +2

      @@TheHailstorm77 You seriously don’t even know what the chemtrail theory is? 😂😂🤣😂 by your own definition, you’ve proven that agent Orange has nothing to do with the chemtrail hoax.