Bro. Seeing planes 10 times larger leaving persistent trails that literally become a thin sheet of whisp that covers the whole sky is not the same as this.
That was the point. A lot of 'chemtrail' trolls try to cite cloud seeding as a source for their 'chemtrail' hoax. It's called false equivalence fallacy, and the video maker is mocking those gullible sheep for their beliefs.
It's a contrail. It's water vapor. What do you think is coming out of your car's exhaust when you start it cold? Do you think gremlins are putting water in your exhaust? Justifying any of the belief in "chemtrails" is literally leading down the road to paranoid schizophrenia.
Absolutely true. Funny thing is I went to the store and it seemed everyone was in a bad mood. I told Mt wife I bet they are spraying. Sure enough the whole sky was covered. I remember Prince talking about that in an interview and I thought he was a little crazy then but not anymore.
@@royalt3690 You're clearly referring to the contrails that are the sole and entire source of the 'chemtrail' hoax. This video is about cloud seeding. The two have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with each other.
They are spraying heavy out of LAX all over Los Angeles county. It effects the way we feel, by limiting our exposure to the sun, while adding heavy metals to leach into the water supply, Also it effects our grow season. Can cause massive floods and other weather disruptions.
If you knew how weather worked you would know it doesn't take a God to make it happen. How weather happens is very well understood. Predicting where its going to take place is the trick.
@Aliving Soul sources (your comment with excesive CAPS) suggests, that you don't have a clue, how anything works, And Are probably, paid by conspiracy theorists
Since it was being done over here since the 1970's, the aerosols if they were using sulphates would have greatly increased the acidity of the air during the reaction with moisture.
@@johnellingsen8284 They don’t use sulphates for cloud seeding and in the concentration for the nucleates that are used, you wouldn’t even be able to detect it let along cause acid rain
What sealed containers? The silver iodide flares? Not "iodine" 😂😂 It's not hard to check a cloud seeding flare. There is nothing hidden about this industry. It's pretty widespread common knowledge.
@@laudedlonnie3278 If you're referring to the white trails that originate from behind large, high altitude aircraft, those most definitely ARE contrails. A few intellectually stumpy, scientifically illiterate sheep refer to them as 'chemtrails', but that is a hoax. They are contrails. Physics proves this. However, the contrails that are the source of the 'chemtrail' hoax have nothing whatsoever to do with cloud seeding, which is the subject of this video. It is titled the way it is because they are making fun of the sheep that use cloud seeding as false equivalence to try (and fail) to connect it to the 'chemtrail' hoax.
@@siouxperb5570 f physics n popular science which has proven to be wrong multiple times. Y’all take everything scientists do as facts. In 30 years a lot of this so called factual science will be obsolete and wrong. Plus you act like governments can’t control or manipulate studies to their favor.
@@laudedlonnie3278 "f physics n popular science which has proven to be wrong multiple times." Cite an example. " Y’all take everything scientists do as facts." Absolutely not. A scientist, as a fallible human being, can lie like anyone else. SCIENCE is absolutely incapable of lying. It has no bias, no slant, and no vested interest in any outcome. That's the beauty of science. You apparently need to learn the distinction between science and scientists. "In 30 years a lot of this so called factual science will be obsolete and wrong." You are actually almost right with this one. Yes, newly discovered facets of science very often undergo revision as new discoveries are made. However, in this particular case, we are speaking about mathematics, which has not really changed at all in human history. And mathematics PROVES (look up the definition of that word, if you have any confusion whatsoever) that the 'chemtrail' hoax is absolutely impossible. If you want to suggest otherwise, you have two options to make your hoax a reality: 1) Name a substance, element or compound, OTHER THAN WATER, that will vaporize at engine exhaust temp, condense at atmospheric temp, and grow in mass in the atmosphere by drawing more of itself upon itself, OR 2 ) Name an aircraft with a payload capacity in excess of many tens of millions of pounds to be able to carry and spray out a chemical trail of the same mass as a persistent contrail. Otherwise, your 'chemtrail' hoax is absolutely dead. "Plus you act like governments can’t control or manipulate studies to their favor." Never once did I say that. But the peer reviewed Knollenberg study that I reference which proves your hoax to be nothing more than fantasy is beyond reproach, particularly from vacuous trolls like you. Otherwise, man up and point our the flaws in that PEER REVIEWED study. You may want to look up what peer reviewed means, before you humiliate yourself further. Regardless, cloud seeding still has nothing whatsoever to do with the 'chemtrail' hoax.
Cloudseeding using silver iodide is one thing...Geoengineering using aluminum oxide, strontium, barium and coal fly ash is totally another. And the tin foil hat term is just another of many derogatory things used to discredit people who do real research into the reality of it.
Do you have any evidence of geoengineering using those substances and currently employing their strategies? And then perhaps could you correlate it to the visible trails in the sky at the source of the chemtrail belief? Show us that “real research”.
@@elyjahstark Heres two to start with: David Keith here on YT, Geoengineeringwatch.org also...definetely worth looking into, with tons of links to other articles and films.
John Boyles your first reference is just a reference to geoengineering research. I specifically asked you for evidence of geoengineering using the substances you named, and evidence it is currently happening. Geoengineering research is not a secret, but you claimed that they use aluminum oxide, barium, strontium, and coal fly ash and are currently deploying the strategy. Also, what would any of this have to do with the visible trails in the sky that linger for hours? Your second link is just to Dane Wigington’s website. Is there a specific link on his website you would like to specifically reference to answer the question I asked you? I’ve looked through many of his links on that page. None of it could be classified as “worth looking into”. It’s just his hub of con artistry where he makes numerous baseless claims he can’t defend knowing full well his followers won’t check the validity of his statements. Let’s go over some links on that page and see. Perhaps we could look through and of the collected samples? Or the patents? Or the section on modern high bypass turbofan engines?
@@johnboyles4101 The Geoengineering strategies that you are referring to (Solar Radiation Management) are with the exception of ground based albedo modification, all entirely hypothetical research proposals. None of them discuss the use of 'aluminium' 'barium' or strontium' although David Keith did discussed the possible use of aluminium oxide Stratospheric Aerosol Injection. You don't seem to comprehend what these programmes would involve. Stratospheric Aerosol Injection - which Harvard's David Keith is indeed the main proponent of would attempt to reproduce the cooling effect of volcanic aerosols. Again, SAI currently exists in the form of paper based research and in the province of computer modelling. Fortunately, the formidable challenges in respect of logistics, geo-politics, governance and the appreciable opposition both within and outside scientific circles mean that it is very unlikely that even in a last ditch attempt to address climate change, that it would ever be used. There is not even an agreement upon the materials that would best be employed to simulate the cooling effect of volcanic aerosols. Last year an experiment was scheduled that never took place involving a steerable balloon launched 20 km into the stratosphere above the Arizona desert releasing water to be followed by mere kilograms of calcium carbonate - yes, chalk - to subsequently measure dispersion and perturbation. This is your SAI and this is what it looks like... projects.iq.harvard.edu/keutschgroup/scopex So a few kilos of water which were never released, compared to the VEI 5/6 monstrous eruption the same year of Shiveluch on the Kamchatka peninsula that you are without doubt unaware of, which caused huge stratospheric injection - alone lofting some 768Gg of sulphate mass up to 12 miles into the atmosphere. Volcanoes produce between 65 and 120 million tonnes of sulphate aerosols per year...which you are entirely oblivious to. However, let's assume for the sake of argument that SAI had progressed beyond research proposal and computer simulation and was actually being deployed, what you fail to appreciate is that you wouldn't see it at all - far less, resembling a long white trail in the wake of a large commercial aircraft. There are number of reasons for this. The purpose of SAI is to reproduce the cooling effect of volcanic aerosols which are produced by the reaction of gaseous H2S and SO2 with water to form aqueous sulphuric acid (H2SO4). Incidentally, these are also occurring heterogeneously in the Junge Layer. Some aerosols are efficient scatterers but only weak absorbers at solar wavelengths so again - there is much work to be done to evaluate which material will best serve this purpose. In order to achieve SAI, such a strategy would be conducted in the mid-stratosphere, (hence the name), not in the tropopause and lower stratosphere the regions in which the contrails that you are observing and under discussion in this video occur. There is currently no aircraft in existence that could loft the requisite payloads to the required altitudes (65,000 - 70,000ft). Moreover, such a programme would be likely equatorial in its location to utilise the Brewer Dobson upper atmospheric circulation patterns; or in polar regions where the required altitude would be lower. Additionally, and highly ironically, through radiative forcing contrails can actually trap heat which is precisely the opposite effect that the proponents of SAI wish to engineer. 'Chemtrails' are a baseless conspiracy theory predicated upon the misidentification of persistent contrails - which is precisely what this video is addressing. This has nothing whatsoever to do with 'geoengineering' and the only reason that you have heard of SAI in the first place is due to the intentional conflation on behalf of the perpetrators of this hoax with research into Solar Radiation Management in a lame attempt to add legitimacy to their claims. Gullible chemtrail believers such as yourself then uncritically lap up this false equivalence and regurgitate it over the internet without knowing the first thing about the subjects that they claim authority over - far less, basic meteorology, aviation, atmospheric science or geoengineering itself and what it entails. Odd don't you think that the entire fields of atmospheric science, meteorology, environmental monitoring and aerospace engineering worldwide - y'know, the people that actually understand the physics of the atmosphere - remain completely oblivious to these supposed geoengineered 'chemtrails'? - yet a community of online overnight 'experts' armchair conspiracy theorists and self-appointed overnight 'experts' think that they know better because the internet told them so. Question for you. Given that SAI doesn't exist beyond research paper and computer models, would not form a trail and would take place at double the altitude of the trails that you are seeing in addition to the fact that there is no aircraft currently in existence that could loft the requisite materials into the mid stratosphere, would not even be visible to a ground based observers and has nothing whatsoever to do with the chemtrail conspiracy theory, which concerns misidentified contrails - may I ask you, what precisely is your point?
Hello from Switzerland, we used rockets with the same chemicals to creat rain but that system was abandoned due to lack of efficiency. There was an article in science magazine that this system is actually ineffective.
@@legalfictionnaturalfact3969 yeah.. They're real "dumb". They're just altering the way weather works. As a kid you use to be able to look up in the sky and see a puffy cloud. Now it looks like complete 💩
Are you stoopid this shit is in allot of places fuckt op for the nature but is in some places its good for starting rains foor dry ground not everything is bad about it
Yh i see like fighting jets like military war big jets that leave these trails and they actually spread a man made chemical that harms ure lungs bc after a chem trailed passes a scintist studyed the air and it showed large amounts of the man made chemical it was on a documantary
ꮋꮲ. ꭼχ𐐬ꭰꭵꭺ then you’ll have no problem validating that claim with the actual source. “It’s in a documentary” isn’t good enough. Are you referring to “what in the world are they spraying”? In that case, they didn’t find any abnormal levels of any chemicals and they didn’t find any “man made” chemicals.
He contradicted himself when he said, “it really depends on what Mother Nature provides” Has anybody else ever noticed tiny floating like strings that attract to your face while outside and attempting to go up your nose that fell from the sky?
Dam you would think some type of electrical disruption would cause more rain...not some chemicals...what about the fact they spray over clear blue skies...without a cloud in sight
Tsetsi .... and your evidence for anything different???? Cloud seeding predominantly does use silver iodide at about 50 grams per seeding mission to add nucleates to clouds to help make it rain more. That’s been pretty public knowledge. Feel free to provide evidence of anything different
I believe it's the opposite! We rarely get rain anymore!! I've lived here over 50 years. Before they started all this, it rained quite a bit. Now? Hardly at all. Why can't we just leave nature to fend for itself!!! Quit purposely spraying us!
Sibyl Matriarch Rising that’s because this video is about cloud seeding. Not the fairy tale belief in Chemtrails regarding the persistent contrails in the sky.
Technically...this plane DOES disperse a "chemtrail". So, there's that. And, just because we are shown a small aircraft used for "cloud seeding", does NOT mean that LARGER aircraft do not "spray" the skies. One only needs to connect the dots. These things are happening RIGHT now...as I type. 1) 90 dams in 26 states were removed in 2019. When measured in cubic meters of water, the dams removed in California, Arizona and Washington state rank the highest in serviceable water contracts. FACT.! 2) Citing "Native American rights, and Salmon habitat" those three states have agreed to restore water rights back to Native tribes along specified regions. FACT.! 3) More and more recent articles are showing up on sites like Yahoo, RT, BBC etc...expressing growing concerns over drought conditions in the southwestern United States. FACT.! 4) Media outlets and state officials have released documents regarding water rationing tier 1 beginning in AZ southern counties in late 2021 and stronger tier 2 proposals starting 2022. Those are just four little dots. "Cloud seeding" is the string you can use to connect the dots. MY OPINION.! Federal and State officials agree to cloud seeding contracts with corporations, it's open source material. Two counties in Colorado "seed" to extend ski season. FACT.! When you understand how warm/hot air draws in moisture, you see that creating larger clouds and cooling the skies means that monsoon rains do not approach when they NORMALLY should...or they are delayed. This means the desert south west is starved of potential groundwater. Just a coincidence that the mainstream outlets program the masses with fear of drought, while pushing back normal rain fall, smaller cattle and produce farmers closing up shop due to lack of water, and right now Native Tribal lands are somehow blessed by the same policies that destroy the rest of the country.? Spraying started at 3am over UTAH/ARIZONA border on 6/2/21, forming dense clouds that drifted south, covering most of AZ today. Cooler desert temps won't be drawing any storm weather in from the east. Desert Monsoon activity is based on moisture coming from the eastern states and Mexico at this time of year. If the ground doesn't heat up in AZ, that potential ground water will never arrive. So, when you start telling people "droughts are likely"...but you're the organization that destroyed the dams that help mitigate the drought because of "Salmon".....and you tell people "drought is upon us", but you're the organization that PAYS to push monsoon activity away from a region...the ONLY thing that adds up, ARE the dots.!!
"Technically...this plane DOES disperse a "chemtrail". So, there's that." Not one that's visible from the ground, so it wouldn't fit the narrative of the hoax. But you seem to understand that. "And, just because we are shown a small aircraft used for "cloud seeding", does NOT mean that LARGER aircraft do not "spray" the skies." No, but physics DOES prove that the contrails that you see, and what some call the 'chemtrail' hoax are NOT sprayed from an aircraft.
@@siouxperb5570 "Not one that's visible from the ground, so it wouldn't fit the narrative of the hoax." WRONG.!! TRY AGAIN.!! A Silver Iodide flare rack in operation is ABSOLUTELY visible from the ground. Why would you suggest to everyone here, that it's not.? The VERY aircraft seen in this video is his 250...but it IS supercharged as well. Max operating ceiling for this bird is 23,000ft. in favorable conditions, and depending on storm/cloud conditions above 15,000ft.....it toggles around 20,000ft. ANYONE with good vision can see the 100ft long trail of flare media burning off at 23,000ft. And, poor vision people aided with optics, can see it. Again, maybe people cannot see the actual Silver iodide condensing water from vapor and doing work....But they can sure as hell see the short trail of cook off from the flares. So, why would you say that the flares("not one that's visible from the ground") cannot be seen from the ground.? YOU'RE BEING INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST TO EVERYONE HERE. WHY.? "No, but physics DOES prove that the contrails that you see, and what some call the 'chemtrail' hoax are NOT sprayed from an aircraft." WRONG AGAIN.!! Your use of circular reasoning or ambiguous statements, doesn't change the laws of fluid dynamics. So, I don't know that you even understand what you're typing. Again, open source material on GOOGLE. International cloud seeding companies hold government contracts to "SPRAY" different "CHEMICALS" from aircraft. FACT.!! Large scale operations include jet aircraft, that "SPRAY" from monitors at the trailing edge of the wings......and sometimes (depending on configuration) from the turbine exhaust nozzle. "Contrails" are created in two different ways. 1) At the tip of a wing or control surface, due to momentary low pressure in humid conditions. 2) From engine exhaust, where hot engine and compression conditions allow the escape and expansion of compressed water vapor. Water vapor is what you cannot see....just before it condenses into the white cloud some several feet behind the engine. FLUID DYNAMICS 101.!! (you're welcome) Persistent contrails DO expand....but ONLY in HUMID conditions. And, "persistent contrails" may form wispy APPEARING clouds...but are not, in fact, a traditional cloud at all. A "chemtrail"...is NOT a" contrail". They are two separate occurrences, and they both exist. So, there is no, "hoax". Aircraft "SPRAY" chemicals...you CAN see from the ground. FACT.!! Some of these chemicals are even mixed within the fuel, itself, forming a "chemtrail" by proxy.
@@billybutcher9912 "A Silver Iodide flare rack in operation is ABSOLUTELY visible from the ground. Why would you suggest to everyone here, that it's not.? " Because of the mass, and the duration of the burning of the flare. This is demonstrable from a video right here on youtube. The altitude is also FAR lower than the 'chemtrail' hoax, as is the absence/presence of clouds in each situation. Couldn't be more polar opposite of subjects. You can't possibly suggest that you could see a few pounds of silver iodide burned for a couple of minutes, vs a contrail containing tens and even hundreds of MILLIONS of pounds of ice from one horizon to the other, are you? Please, tell me you're not that obtuse... You actually demonstrated that you can explain contrails and their formation (correctly, and very surprisingly for someone of apparent cognitive reasoning, so congratulations for that) yet you still think the 'chemtrail' hoax is even possible. Care to reconcile that paradox?
@@siouxperb5570 I've explained in detail how a person of moderate vision can observe the use of Iodide flares, in operation. And, with the use of optics, for people of lesser vision. If you're going to try and claim the moral high ground....just because you don't focus attention to aircraft in flight...I can't stop you. Some people look up......some don't..and, it's not a defense for you claiming I cannot see well. I observe military, civilian and commercial aircraft in flight..hours at a time. I look up. My eyes know what to look for. I can see a raw exhaust on a warm day at 30,000ft. with a pair of binoculars. No contrail...no chemtrail, just simple pollution from a moderately efficient engine. I have no idea what your motivation is, for labeling an obvious and stated goal of releasing particles into the atmosphere, as a "hoax". Maybe you're simply stating that this particular Comanche is not chemtrailing, in the traditional sense of the widely known facts surrounding "chemtrails". If this is the case, you might just agree with most people here and state, that, "While I agree that there are chemtrails being left in the skies...this aircraft is not guilty of mass spraying." (something to that effect) You have done nothing to counter my statements in regards to the contracts in effect, signed by federal, state and local officials surrounding their involvement in weather modification en mass. Why is that.? Is it because the only information you'd find..PROVES actual chemtrails exist.? No one is hiding it any longer. Companies market and advertise worldwide. "from horizon to horizon".. So, explain to me the paradox you've created for everyone here, to understand. You stated, "from horizon to horizon". If you expect everyone to believe an aircraft engine is emitting a simple contrail, why shouldn't EVERY contrail be from horizon to horizon, then.? Can't prove a negative.? lol
@ELYJAH STARK Yeah, figured as much. I'm an old hat at spotting them. The trick is to help them waist their time..they never come back with direct answers to questions. That's why I typed "circular reasoning" in one of my responses. They love to ignore the facts and put things out of context. Thanks.
It's time between end of winter and start of summer in India. What is the need to seed for rain at this time? Since last 2 days they have been spreading and it dint rain and it must not or all crop will be dead. So it's not for rain sure.
@@estelaosorio7468 - I know you are not from here, or the City by your post. But the " Term " of " Roaches and Rats " is referring to as People in the City. Hence the " Joke ". 😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️
@@elyjahstark proof of your lack of understanding. I can't prove whats hidden by cowards who won't show all evidence for obvious reasons. *hint*, pentagon attacks on 9/11 how many video footage was there? How many got shown? And it's supposed to be the most tragic event on American soil? Again, at least God wouldn't hide information like athiest. But Me, and science can prove this planet would be better off without humans, how is that evolution? Proof #2 (of your lack of understanding). That's not the same. The "logic" is God gave us this. What other animal would figure out techs other then humans?................. In simpler terms, "science is God's blueprint". We're just figuring out what was left for us. And the *elements used* were also natural and non synthetic. I'm answering your question your just faili g to understand, you'd be a remedial class student.
SOME days, like once every couple of weeks, "They" lay down 15- 25 trails across the blue sky, turning it white in 2 hours. The next day is always rainy / overcast. Im annoyed nobody notices this. Southern Ontario Canada.
Dan Urech, you can’t see cloud seeding taking place...so your comment is pointless. Are you referring to the persistent contrails in your sky that are indicative of planes flying through colder and more moist air masses, which are Indicators for approaching cold fronts? (Hence the rain and clouds).
@@elyjahstark yeah i know i went full retard with that one. I deleted it right after i read it and googled cold humid air. I hoped you wouldn't still see it. Thanks for your patience dude. i feel better now and less nutty. You couldve insulted me but you didnt. Very classy cheers
Dan Urech it’s refreshing to see such humility. I’m glad you were able to look it up, question your claim, and then admit it was wrong. Takes a lot more strength than digging your feet in and believing it anyway like most on these videos. Cheers
@@elyjahstark ua-cam.com/users/shortsDJFvt0R6p-Q?feature=share they get in my way, but at the end he said it’s paid by the counties, I know longer feel bothered at the pilots, I was troubled at this, once a pilot flying those things saw it too, next thing you know 4-5 came out, spooked, maybe even were paid extra just to cover the sky intentionally (but now I know, who’s behind it, it makes sense to me) regardless I walk with the lord and these mean no harm. Peace to you brother.
Thomas Coffin if there is evidence to back it up and support it, a conspiracy could be valid. That isn’t the case for The chemtrail theory which has no evidence and contradicts the laws of physics.
Thomas Coffin I don’t believe in the stupid ones (most of them) and I continue to remain skeptical about even the ones with sufficient evidence. Although I don’t care whether or not people believe in them because the have a right to, as long as they are not dangerous to an innocent populace.
Thanks for all the depression you've caused me with your so-called experiment changing what used to be blue skies to everyday gray. God gave mankind beauty and you take that away.
Cloud seeding doesn’t change a blue sky to gray. It only attempts to add nucleates to existing rain clouds to increase rain fall. It was already going to be cloudy and rainy.
Cloud seeding, in it's very designed purpose, will bring your blue skies back SOONER, as the purpose of it is to attempt to increase the onset of precipitation from already formed rain clouds. It sounds like you're referring to the 'chemtrail' hoax.
@Keith David Which two profiles are you specifically referring to? Can't be me, because I've never heard of at least two of the video subjects you've mentioned. The only hoax videos I comment on are the 'chemtrail' ones, specifically because the meltdown that occurs when you show the trolls that 'chemtrails' are mathematically impossible is far too entertaining to resist. They insist upon not only displaying, but showcasing their scientific illiteracy publicly. I help them along in that endeavor. So you're clearly speaking about someone else.
@Keith David You're the one that believes in a mathematically impossible hoax, and you call someone else a psycho? Ironic. BTW, how many socks are you up to now, Keith? And why do you block me from some?
@Keith David Ok, Keith, have fun. But please, in all seriousness, stop blocking me from seeing some of your socks. You take a lot of the fun out of mocking you that way. I miss Jeff Malone and Ray Forester. Clever double use of your latest username. Reversal of the Harvard scientist researching SAI, and also your real first name. I knew you had some cleverness hidden there somewhere.
What does that have to do with this video? Contrail persistence is indicative of the air at cruising altitudes getting colder and more humid, which is what happens when cold fronts approach your area. That is why cirrus clouds and contrail persistence can be used to predict potential rain in the forecast. The weather is creating the persistent contrail, not the other way around.
Correlation does not equal causation. For example, every October, the leaves in my area turn orange, brown, and red, and fall from the trees. Then SURE ENOUGH, just like clockwork, within a few weeks, the ground is covered with snow. Therefore, the turning and falling of leaves MUST be the cause of the snow.
And generally during the winter months it is the "approach???" of a "cold front" not necessarily rain. Which does not match the cold front properties of a continental cold air mass from the arctic like it used to.
No, Agl is not a heavy metal (although the silver ion is). Neither are potassium iodide, dry ice or liquid propane which have also been used as cloud seeding materials. The silver constituent of Agl is merely an impurity arising from photosensitivity. Because silver iodide and not elemental silver constitutes the seeding material, the claims of damaging environmental impact have been found to be insignificant by peer-reviewed research. The negligible quantities of silver generated by cloud seeding, amount to about one percent of industry emissions into the atmosphere. Moreover, accumulations in the soil, vegetation, and surface runoff have not been sufficiently large enough to measure above natural background levels.
@@yassassin6425 I think a few simple questions to ask are, Does it pose a risk to the quality of clean air? Is it a normal, organic substance in the air that we should be breathing? What effect do these substances have on the soil and what is the uptake into food sources? What studies have been done on the effect of these substances on the immune system of human beings? It seems so incredibly intuitive and simple, in the same way that smoking is bad for human health. People knew intuitively long before the Surgeon General put out the warning statement in 1969 about cigarettes, that they were killing people. But because studies weren't yet "conclusive" it was tolerated and ignored. I believe that these substances have an entirely different purpose than rain........specifically as catalysts in the atmosphere for augmentation as well as an inhibiting medium.....I won't comment any further than that....and studies will never be done to determine their effect on the immune system.
@@joegee1000 Thanks for your civil reply. "Does it pose a risk to the quality of clean air?" No. Each cloud seeding run releases few ounces of material and is utterly insignificant, I mean non-registerable against ground level pollution. Moreover, it is very unlikely that the air that you are breathing on a daily basis is 'clean'. "Is it a normal, organic substance in the air that we should be breathing?" Do you drive? "What effect do these substances have on the soil and what is the uptake into food sources?" Zero. As I said accumulations in the soil, vegetation, and surface runoff have not been sufficiently large enough to measure above natural background levels. "What studies have been done on the effect of these substances on the immune system of human beings?" Toxicity is chiefly a function of time against exposure, concentration and pathway. "It seems so incredibly intuitive and simple, in the same way that smoking is bad for human health." You are comparing direct inhalation of tobacco containing 4,000 chemicals and 70 known carcinogens to a few ounces of Agl dispersed into a cloud at 4,000 feet? "People knew intuitively long before the Surgeon General put out the warning statement in 1969 about cigarettes, that they were killing people. But because studies weren't yet "conclusive" it was tolerated and ignored." Absolutely, due to vested interests and lobbying from the highly lucrative tobacco industry. Again, you are overlooking frequency and concentration. "I believe that these substances have an entirely different purpose than rain........" Then you would I think agree that several ounces would be somewhat inconsequential. "specifically as catalysts in the atmosphere for augmentation as well as an inhibiting medium...." Then you would need to demonstrate precisely how a few lbs of Agl, KI, C3H8...or dry ice has the capacity to do so. "I won't comment any further than that....and studies will never be done to determine their effect on the immune system." You just did. If cloud seeding were at all widespread or prevalent then the effects upon public health would certainly be under great scrutiny...not least for fear of legal action and litigation. Unlike smoking, establishing a causal link to the incidence of a health condition however would be virtually impossible due to the virtually negligible quantities of material employed. As I said, there are plenty of impact statements that have been undertaken, some of which have been very poorly executed and vastly over exaggerate the risks associated. If cloud seeding were to become common practice far from the issue of the materials themselves, the main concern would be the implications of interfering with the natural equilibrium of the atmosphere. The amount of moisture in the atmosphere is determined by the balance between evaporation and precipitation. In the most unlikely scenario that cloud seeding as ever to be conducted on a large scale, it might lead to increased evaporation from locations outside the seeding area - rain falling in one place would have fallen somewhere else. However, atmospheric budgets suggest that cloud seeding is unlikely to steal moisture from downwind sites because clouds represent a modest portion of the moisture in the atmosphere, a cloud-seeding effect of 15% would only remove about 1-2% of the total water vapour in the seeding area.
@@yassassin6425 Thanks for your comprehensive and obviously well informed reply here. You spoke to every question I posted, and have resolved all but a few things in my mind. I'll post those later, no time now. Thanks for taking the time Yassassin, much appreciated
Cloud Seeding and geoengineering *(aka chemtrails)* are two entirely different things. They have almost nothing in common other than planes being involved.
Then why are you commenting on this video? Also, what planes are used for geoengineering proposals, considering they need to release payloads at 65k feet in altitude and research is still in computer simulation modeling?
You are partially correct. Cloud seeding, geoengineering (SRM/SAI research) and persistent contrails (the physical source of the 'chemtrail' hoax) are THREE completely different things. At least you've managed to separate ONE of the false equivalence fallacies from the hoax. Keep going, you'll get it.
@@ragnarokruner2168 No the video is making fun of chemtrail believers who correlate the two, “dummy”. Did that go over your head? Do you also not understand contrail persistence? I love you gullible, ignorant, scientifically illiterate, close-minded chemtrail believers desperately trying to confirm your anti-government bias in whatever magical, physics-defying way possible.
So only 2 flairs per thunder storm cell and makes it rain? Wow. Wonder what the maximum and minimum amount of rain they get per cell / per flair? Very interesting Paul. Oddly enough, I don't think I've seen one of these before.
@elyjahstark I have seen you in most comments. This makes me wonder why you defend it so viciously? I know that it is the 2020s, and we are not allowed to ask questions about anything(virus, vaccine, 9/11, war in Ukraine, Israel...) but come on, don't you have any sense that they might be lying??
Silver iodide is dispersed via at least four methods--[1] aircraft (as shown in this video), [2] burn sticks containing silver iodide, placed in desirable spots on the ground, [3] rockets (they are often also fired in order to prevent the formation of crop-damaging hail [some tea growers also use them], sometimes with radar-reflecting "needle" wire dipoles scattered through the silver iodide, to enable tracking of the release points; some hail rockets are at least partially reusable), and [4] surplus AA (antiaircraft) guns, whose shells contain silver iodide instead of high explosive. The Chinese make extensive use of cloud-seeding AA guns, whose shells' fuzes can be set to burst at any desired altitude within the guns' altitude capabilities.
@@oscarb9139 You might want to research EVERGREEN. They are a nefarious organization. And the aircraft that are producing chemtrails fly at a much higher altitude and they are unmarked aircraft. I speak from personal experience.
Cloud seeding is such 1940's technology! The following is a brief summary of rain generating activities by US government and allied nations. Some details are vague or purposely omitted. Since the mid-1990's the USAF along with other agencies such as NOAA have been using a range of radio frequencies both to generate or prevent rain. So-called chemtrails are essential to RF methods of weather control. Aerosols are used both as chaff for radar targeting, and condensation nuclei to prime the atmosphere over a targeted region. (They also cause atmospheric warming by-the-way.) Every NEXRAD site is integrated into a weather control grid and directed by computer “forecast” models. By chemtrailing a region to be targeted, 2 or more radar beams can be precisely aimed and crossed to effect atmospheric conditions over an area of 250 square miles or more. This is done with heterodyning, where 2 or more slightly different frequencies interfere to generate a lower frequency. As a general rule frequencies (SHF and higher, 3-170 GHz) disrupt condensation, and frequencies (HF and lower, 3-30 MHz) cause rapid condensation. There may be other frequency bands in use or under research, but according to specifications and observed effects, these are primary. The effects of heterodyning can often be seen in standing longitudinal waves in clouds which appear a few hours or minutes before a rain event. A full explanation of this topic could take hundreds of pages.
Thank you so much. I'm waiting for Elijah bot to post on this and harass you for evidence. I guess what you've posted is so damning that it, the bot, doesn't want to draw attention to what you posted.
How about some citations about these “facts”. Most of what you say sounds like fancy words with no supporting evidence. If you don’t want to type out an explanation (please don’t) you can provide links to supporting documents. We await your answer!
@@oscarb9139 Hey my so called pilot try this on: Do you affirm under penalty of perjury that no atmospheric aerosol injection of any kind is taking place? Do you affirm under penalty of perjury that you are not being paid or commanded to post comments online?
It’s not nothing to do with it the seeding program he is doing adds to atmospheric moisture and we all know what tornadoes are and they’re small hurricanes so he is feeding hurricanes and storms and tornadoes
@@tonetwice8548 Disregarding the complete inaccuracies in your post about tornadoes, cloud seeding actually deters large storm formation that creates tornadoes and hail. By increasing the moisture of the system at the right time, the cloud will release the rain quicker and a storm won’t build up. That’s why farmers try and use it to limit storm destruction to their crops.
Unfortunately, the use of silver iodide has been linked to numerous health risks, including toxicity, reproductive disorders, developmental defects, and cancer. Symptoms of silver iodide toxicity include coughing, wheezing, and difficulty breathing.
@@brettharter143 Chemtrails are defined as the name ignorant people call the persistent visible trails across the sky behind airliners. You know, those big white lines you see that occasionally can persist and spread? Cloud seeding is the process of using light aircraft flying directly into or around rain systems at lower altitudes without leaving a visible trail. Pretty different. If your definition of a chemtrail widens to include planes spraying chemicals, then you’ll also have to include crop dusters, aerial fire fighting, stunt shows, etc.
At this time the UK is experiencing a heatwave, day after day of blue skies for weeks. For the first few days there were no plane trails, the sky was bright azure blue, visibility; excellent, my windows were clean, the air was a pleasure to breathe & while bike riding my mouth remained moist. Then it started; day after day after day of 24 hour plane trails which merged & covered the sky. In the next few days the haze descended to earth & it has remained as the plane trails have continued (I live by the coast and the visibility is easy to see across the bay). The sunshine is now hazy, the visibility is poor, the air is not pleasant to breathe, while bike riding my mouth constantly dries & my windows that were clean are now covered with a film of fine white/metallic dust. This sequence of events is nothing new to me, I have seen it time & time again so is it really that surprising that people conclude that it is actually particles rather than moisture droplets or ice crystals?
So the approaching front which causes the contrails you see and the changing weather conditions you experience somehow translates in your mind to man changing the weather with the trails, and not the weather causing the trails? You sure don't understand the magnitude of the power involved in weather systems. Besides, what does ANY of that have to do with cloud seeding, which is the subject of this video?
@@siouxperb5570 Yay - same instant reply from the same names after all these years. How's the struggle going? - not very well judging by all the comments. Actually, I didn't blame any kind of source - I simply listed the course of events as they have happened again & again, I didn't even mention "chemtrails".
@@kenny832 "I didn't even mention "chemtrails" ". Neither did I, so why are you now? You also didn't explain why you made these comments under a cloud seeding video.....
@@siouxperb5570 what a shill... he contradicts every comment by people that all agree with the same thing plus he has no content or anything and has been on youtube since 06 but he posted a link in his about section about contrails which clearly describe them in a way that clearly differentiates them from what we see happening to jets which is not condensation of the wakes of the craft but giant plumes in the middle of the summer sun right in line with the hot engines which promote superfreezing at high altitudes with the right pressure. Thats why jets spray them at 42k feet one day and maybe 38k feet the next day... This guy is obviously a paid shill. No one trolls the topics they think are foolish conspiracies only agents do. They work hard to control the narrative dont they... dont you Siouxperb.. Who do you work for Al Gore?
@@ryanwyrick6947 Why do you think contrails are 'chemtrails' when that is physically impossible? Do you enjoy getting mocked for your declared belief in magic? And why are you talking about 'chemtrails' (which are contrails, proven) in the comment section of a cloud seeding video? Do you not understand the vast differences between cloud seeding and the 'chemtrail' hoax? Would you like to get into it? Because I have no issue embarrassing you by exposing your ignorance on this and other associated subjects. You clearly know absolutely nothing about aviation, nor atmospheric science. You've read the pdf on my "about" tab, right? How can those contrails that weigh many tens of millions of pounds from a single aircraft be a 'chemtrail' sprayed from the payload of any aircraft? Let's hear the answer to that, troll boy.
Correct. Cloud seeding is just the false equivalence fallacy that chemtrail believers like to use to defend their belief that the persistent contrails in the sky are anything but water condensation.
George sorros and other elites, why do you think they have bilderberg meetings? to test the new brands of skittles together? Pretty soon we will be paying for it with carbon tax and clapping our hands when they gov says they will spray the skies to cool the planet and save it.
@@oscarb9139 Maybe because I start talking about JTRIG and their online strategies right from the start. Could also be the script programmers do not have a good way to deal with challenges to go live and show a face to an account name.
There is no Trinity There are quite a few differences. 1) cloud seeding trails aren’t persistent and only last a few feet mainly from water vapor from the flare combustion. 2) cloud seeding is done right next to or above or below developed rain systems. 3) cloud seeding usually uses silver iodide or dry ice, not the aluminum, barium, and strontium you usually hear. 4) the silver iodide sprayed measures in the range of hundreds of grams, where 1 gram can nucleate over a million ice crystals. 5) none of the silver iodide is in high enough concentrations to be traceable by rain water, river water, or air quality tests and is definitely not reaching levels of toxicity. You aren’t being poisoned by it and neither is anyone else.
Stop Censoring me says the guy that fails to ever produce any evidence for any of his claims. The irony never stops with you. If you had taken the time to get off your lazy ass and go verify any of the claims I made, you’d be able to see whether they were true or false and not make yourself look like such an idiot all the time.
Stop Censoring me another wasted comment proving how much of a moron you are. Do you have evidence yet for your claims or do you want to embarrass yourself again here like you did in the other threads?
They use jet planes for chem trails. These are not the same type of planes. I live in the Pacific northwest where it rains the most in America and I see them any day that the sun actually comes out. They are not cloud seeding. I don't obviously know what is going on up there, but it's not cloud seeding. This guy needs to look into this more.
That's the joke. The point of this video is to mock the idiotic sheep that try to use cloud seeding as a false equivalence to justify their 'chemtrail' hoax.
I see the other troll siouxperb5570 is here Elijah's minion. Anyone who makes a video to mock someone is evil which means any of their info can't be trusted. They are most definitely doing something to the weather and it isn't just cloud seeding.
Actually, I've researched aerial spraying for decades. Chem trails are NOT the same as cloud seeding(weather manipulation). One uses aluminium oxide and other metals and chemicals and sprays over populated areas affecting plant life, soil, water and the population. Fertility and immune system damage are 2 common side effects. The chemicals used vary based on the brand or recipe used. This is usually sponsored by private companies and /or corporations (likely leading back to the medical industry). Cloud seeding is basically making clouds density higher thus increasing the chance of precipitation in the designated areas. This is sponsored by local counties and government. Don't be fooled or confused into thinking its all the same. It's not. Also, Don't try to confuse people with bad info and titles. Thanks
No one was trying to "fool" anyone. The uploader titles the video this way, partially to mock the 'chemtrail' trolls who fell for the hoax, and partially because those same trolls often use cloud seeding as false equivalence to attempt (but fail) to legitimize their hoax. The 'chemtrail' hoax is nothing more than the misidentification of persistent aircraft contrails. The laws of physics unquestionably prove this.
Anonymous Guest still holding patterns. Also nothing to do with the video in cloud seeding. Cloud seeding doesn’t leave a visible trail and they don’t fly in racetrack patterns in clear sky, rather directly next to existing rain systems.
Anonymous Guest no, YOU have made an assertion with no evidence. I’ve provided you evidence on why the planes are flying in racetrack patterns. You are more than welcome to present evidence to the contrary.
If chemtrails are actually a real thing, then why do we spray for mosquitoes and do aerial crop dusting at low altitudes? It’s because chemicals evaporate at high altitudes.
@@johnellingsen8284 No plane is capable of carrying the requisite payload to form the contrails being discussed. It doesn’t matter what form it is in. Not even close
Every time we get a bright blue sky these days over here, planes start playing tik tak toe with their trails in the morning. They spread out, form clouds out of nowhere, and sure enough, the sun is gone in the afternoon. Whatever they're doing, it's not just cloud seeding. I'm just not sure if they want to protect us from the sun since UV intensity has been crazy in the past decades or if they want us to be miserable.
@@siouxperb5570 You're literally checking this comment section at least once per week to answer people like me. I know what you're doing, government drone, and it doesn't work.
@@FlameJackstar "You're literally checking this comment section at least once per week to answer people like me" Nope. Multiple times DAILY, so pay attention. The entertainment value of watching ignorant, scientifically illiterate trolls that insist on claiming that myself and people like me can perform magic is simply too precious! "I know what you're doing, " Anyone who can read can clearly see that. Making fun of idiots by posting factual, verifiable information is not hard to figure out. You're just mad because I called you out for your ignorance. But, since you're here, go ahead and explain why you are confusing cloud seeding with the 'chemtrail' hoax, which is predicated solely and entirely upon persistent aircraft contrails. Let's hear it, sunshine.
@@siouxperb5570 Hey buddy. these chemtrails are sprayed over our heads every day! and we did not vote for this too happen! every day there's a blue sky Boom chemtrails! People have gone up and taken samples of chemtrails and bad stuff was in it theres literally planes covering up the blue sky. you need the blue sky it helps you be healthy. wake up
for him to say he's doing that where the meteoroligists want it to happen isn't that like the weather channel makes a prediction that may or may not be true but then these people come in and make it true? it's not even natural to do this and might as well say because people do this you can force a thunderstorm over any place you want even if it wasn't supposed to happen
Beez Saz another naive statement? Cloud seeding doesn’t create weather. He is simply adding a small mass of nucleates to an already developed system to increase rain fall. The weather was already going to happen.
Apex Trippy ...cool , but it’s still the wrong video. It doesn’t matter if you agree. This video Is about cloud seeding, not geo engineering. Geo engineering is a field of research looking at ways to temporarily impact the climate and has absolutely nothing to do with this video. Cloud seeding is the adding of nucleates to already developed rain clouds to potentially make it rain sooner and slightly more.
Elyjah Stark You do know cloud seeding is a form of geo engineering right? Cloud seeding does not only cause rain, however it can also halt rain, create snow, and destroy hurricanes. You’re contradicting yourself if your saying cloud seeding is not temporarily impacting our climate. Lol
Apex Trippy cloud seeding is absolutely not a form of geoengineering. Is that a joke? Are you claiming that adding nucleates to a single cloud system will impact the climate? “It can also halt rain” somewhat. If it is able to effectively nucleate a cloud system, the rain will dump sooner and therefore not grow into a hail producing system. “Create snow” which is the same as creating rain in different temperatures. “Destroy hurricanes” completely false. Nice try though adding that one in there. They tried to use it to weaken hurricanes by seeding one side of the hurricane but it was never shown to work. It definitely never “destroyed” any. If that were the case, people would be cloud seeding every hurricane. “You’re contradicting yourself if your saying cloud seeding is not temporarily impacting our climate” you do understand the difference between weather and climate right? Speaking of contradiction, you contracting yourself by saying the words temporarily and climate in the same sentence. What a joke.
Charles Hatfield made it rain in So Cal and flooded San Diego in 1905. First hurricane was steered in 1947. Russia made it rain on Chernobyl during the nuclear accident to keep the radiation isolated. Weather mod is a big business and all the countries have been doing it for years.
And you aren’t...do you understand concentrations and are you aware how toxicity works? If you are concerned, I highly suggest you measure the air, water, and soil and see if you can find any traceable amounts.
We had pink "cloudseeding" yesterday. The trails were bright pink and the sky turned pink. No rain today. What did they seed for? Didn't get cotton candy either.
"We had pink "cloudseeding" yesterday. The trails were bright pink and the sky turned pink." Let's see, the sky turned pink. It wasn't, first thing in the morning or early evening by any chance? "No rain today. What did they seed for?" Have you at any point considered that actually, you are mistaken and "they" didn't do anything of the sort? "Didn't get cotton candy either." You mean cumulus? You can surely comprehend that the purpose of cloud seeding is not to create clouds?
@@yassassin6425 No, it was about 3pm in the afternoon and I could see the pink trails - no question, they were pink trails. The sky turned pink as the trails started to dissipate . So they weren't cloudseeding - what were they spraying in the sky? And no, I didn't mean cumulus - I meant actual cotton candy. The trails were bright pink and dissipated into a light pink, just like a cotton candy color. I was hoping they were spraying cotton candy into the sky because alternative ideas is scary.
@@yassassin6425 Illinois and I was outside waiting for a ride so didn't. I saw pink skies North East at first and I turned and looked South and South West was the pink trails. I have an older phone and the pictures aren't great but I can guarantee I'm not the first nor only one who has seen this. If you want pictures there are pictures online, just search for "pink chemtrails", pics and even video pop up. I have a feeling you don't believe anything outside of your realm, that's fine if you don't believe me. It doesn't matter, I KNOW what I saw and I know it wasn't cloudseeding.
@@spiritcdl "If you want pictures there are pictures online, just search for "pink chemtrails" Confirmation bias much? Ok, let's do that... www.google.com/search?q=pink+chemtrails&rlz=1C1GCEV_enGB824GB826&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiEv_T6v6vmAhXxURUIHVmVB_IQ_AUoAXoECAwQAw&biw=1366&bih=657 ...As I suspected. Contrails at dusk then. "I have a feeling you don't believe anything outside of your realm" You mean rationality, logic and reason? How ironic...spoken from within your online echo-chamber. "that's fine if you don't believe me." Known science and the physical laws of the atmosphere are not about belief. "It doesn't matter, I KNOW what I saw and I know it wasn't cloudseeding." No one is suggesting that it was. Cloud seeding has nothing whatsoever to do with persistent contrails that have been observed, documented, measured and studied since the early advent of powered flight.
Yeah, disrupt the amount of water that remains in the clouds (make it rain more) then wonder why we have droughts and weather patterns going crazy all over the world; blame it ofon climate change an people consuming to much petrol then tax the hell out of them. Makes sense $$$.
@@Steviewonderisntblind why are you spamming a link to one of Dane Wigingtons videos of baseless claims about the chemtrail theory? This is a video about cloud seeding. Do you not know the difference? Or are you just trolling?
cloud seeding has never been a secret. There’s nothing to admit. If you are referencing the visible trails in the sky that people misidentify as “Chemtrails” then, no, they are not admitting any such thing.
@@Steviewonderisntblind why are you spamming a link to one of Dane Wigingtons videos of baseless claims about the chemtrail theory? This is a video about cloud seeding. Do you not know the difference? Or are you just trolling?
Not very high, I believe. It needs very specific circumstances to have a hope of working, and even then it's definitely not very likely to cause rain. It's definitely not going to create rain in the desert. However, I'm sure the efficacy of mentioning the words chem trails in a UA-cam video will prove to be very high; before long the weird people will show up saying what they think they have to say 😉
There has yet to be a solid scientific proof that it has any effect. To be fair those things would be extremely hard to prove even if they worked. You never have two identical cases where in one you seed and in the other you don't seed and you compare the results. Too many unknown. It's pretty efficient to get the pilot more hours though, there is little doubt so good for him :)
@@justme9338 “They need to stop trying to alter the weather” Why should they stop? Do you follow the same logic when you drive your car? Your CO2 emissions are changing the weather. Why are you trolling a cloud seeding video? Now hurry up and delete and repost your comment like the good little troll you are. I’d hate for you to actually have to answer the questions and engage in conversation.
What trollijah? Cloud seeding or not people need to stop trying to change the weather nature is getting pissed and it's warning us but people think they are so smart and know so much but in reality they do not.
Bobbie S because cloud seeding can’t create clouds it rain systems. They can only attempt to add rain to already developed systems. If there’s gonna be a drought, cloud seeding won’t help. .... and California has been using cloud seeding for decades.
AdelaideSky who couldn’t get any rain? The efficacy of cloud seeding has always been questionable because there’s no definitive way of knowing if the amount of rain in the system increased. Back up your claims please troll.
But I saw and took pics of some today in the Northern California and there certainly wasn’t a storm anywhere within 100 miles and it was a beautiful blue sky day. Plane was a military looking plane not a little RC plane like this 😂and just happened to be coming from Travis Air Force base.
“But I saw and took pics” so you didn’t see cloud seeding then.... Are you referring to persistent contrails, which are completely irrelevant to the topic of this video?
AdelaideSky ....I’ll repeat my first comment....how would you know? Cloud seeding isn’t visible. And persistent contrails will be there as long as the atmosphere in your area is conducive for formation and persistence.
yidthescholar what does “being afraid of the sun” have to do with adding rain to already developed rain systems? That tends to empty the rain cloud faster.
Despite what was said in the video cloud seeding is used for more than adding rain. NASA has confirmed on their website that they use cloudseeding to control global warming as well. They also confirm that it is an experiment that could have detrimental effects to the environment. The sun moon stars clouds have been doing their thing for millions of years, humans don't need to alter it in anyway.
yidthescholar cloud seeding is only used to add rain to rain systems. Did you watch the video? That process tends to empty the rain cloud faster, which can lead to more rain in one area, less rain in another, and can reduce hail production by decreasing the likelihood a large hail producing cloud will form. NASA has not once ever admitted to using cloud seeding to control global warming. You’ll need a citation for that claim and you won’t find one. Are you intentionally trying to deceive people? Or are you ignorantly trying to conflate research into geoengineering with cloud seeding?
I remember not too long ago when the riots were going on in Philadelphia.. the biggest rains I ever seen were happening I’m sure the government had something to do with that for sure.. they would make it rain to affect riots and make people stay home.. I always had a gut feeling that the weather can be controlled didn’t know it was actually true that’s brazy
Weather cannot be "controlled". The absolute best theoretical application close to that is cloud seeding, the effectiveness of which is marginal, at best. No one can "make" it rain. Only nature can do that. Cloud seeding simply aims to make it rain very slightly sooner, very slightly more, or to attempt to mitigate hail formation. That's literally all. The idea of "controlling" weather is childish "B" movie science fiction.
@The Escape Project If you're referring to the silver iodide that act as the condensation nuclei, the answer is no. The rain nor crops are affected. If you believe otherwise, cite the study or hypothesis that asserts this.
Well when youtube has to go out of it's way to link a encyclopedia post on a subject being debated. That is simply called manufacturing dissent. Persuading public opinion!!!!
Ricky Ortiz this video is about cloud seeding. The encyclopedia post is simply there because the word “chemtrail” is in the title. The persistent contrails (irrelevant time this video) that you are in dissension with don’t care about public opinion. Maybe pay attention next time before you comment.
AdelaideSky could ask you the same thing troll. No life? People will think you’re an idiot spreading misinformation and making claims you can’t back up on a cloud seeding video 😂 oh wait, you are.
AdelaideSky I bet considering she’s not alive....she’s probably extremely stiff. But hey, won’t judge you, everyone has their fetishes. But this explains your mental stability and why you believe in Chemtrails.
Well fortunately drinking water is tested regularly, and you can even test it yourself. See if you can pick up any of the 50 grams of silver iodide they release over hundreds and thousands of square miles.
2:09 Something to the effect of I just wait for a meteorologist to say, You know what? In the next hour, I need you to get airborne and head out to the north, or give me a direction to go, and 'find a thunderstorm and seed it' WHAT THE FUCK
Please let it rain in California all the little pupper doggers will be sad if it doesn't rain in California. They're engineering it to be dry, but it should be raining. Very odd jet stream patterns. California needs rain.
Peter Piper thanks for your reply Peter but I have been a Californian my whole life, for 34 years, and the climate has changed dramatically, I mean DRAMATICALLY in my lifetime and even more the past few years, and the fires we have experienced have only made these changes more obvious. Please don’t talk to me about my own experience as a native of this state. California is a huge state and the weather is different all up and down it so I wonder as u are explaining this to me what part of the state u are referring to? Not where I am from. I’m not sure what your point is but arguing that our climate is not changing is just silly and everyone is beginning to share concern. Have a nice night.
Climates have always changed. The Sahara Desert used to be a savannah grassland with lakes. Get a slight change in the axis of the earth (which is what some scientists believe happened several years ago but you don't hear much about it for some strange reason) and all of California can either become a desert or a tropical rainforest with no way for humans to stop the change.
Hey, kriss, did anything that I said constitute harassment in any way? Or did I simply clarify what the title of the video is intending? Our confused friend here is having trouble with word definitions.
@@kriss3d Shhhhhh.......Jeffy thinks he found a "smoking gun" document that shows dihydrogen monoxide in these trails, and he's trying to provide this as nefarious "proof" of 'chemtrails. Don't ruin this....it's WAY too entertaining.....
Its called geoengineering there's no conspiracy If you can't clearly tell the difference between a contrails of crystallized water vapor that extends up to a few miles behind a plane that melts within minutes and a particle trails from geoengineering projects that extend across the whole sky lasting for hours as they slowly expand into a thin haze that remains in the sky all day you need serious help
No, this is called cloud seeding. It has nothing to do with any geoengineering research. And definitely nothing to do with the contrails you seem easily confused by.
@@elyjahstark wow you obviously don't know s*** geoengineering or climate engineering has many of categories the main one being supposably solar radiation management so whether it's Sai or so-called cloud seeding they're all forms and techniques of weather manipulation which is climate engineering/ geoengineering
@@wiseup7908 How adorable. Someone who doesn’t know anything about cloud seeding or geoengineering telling someone else they don’t know anything. Couldn’t be any more ironic. You really should research both subject and learn the differences between the two. Weather manipulation is not climate engineering. That’s a hilarious assertion. Adding a slight amount of rainfall to an existing system does not impact the climate. The amount of energy required to change the climate is far more substantial. You’ll learn eventually
This is just bullshit to make you look the other way. What about the military jets spraying in the blue skies where there isnt a cloud within 1000 miles.
So why they normalising it then? There’s chemtrails even in video games such as Red Dead Redemption 2 a prequel to RDR1 which was made 8 or so years prior. RDR1 didn’t have chemtrails implemented but RDR2 did. This is a Wild West game set in 1899 before the invention of airplanes so what business do they have in a wild western? And why go out their way to implement it into the graphics to try and “normalise” this if there isn’t anything sinister behind them.
@@siouxperb5570 contrail and chemtrails are different and even if it was a contrail it would still come from an air craft which proves the point that its being conditioned and normalised where it has no business such as Wild West video games that a lot of young naive individuals play. Your dumb. Wake up.
@@SHEPARD22 "contrail and chemtrails are different" Yes, one is real, one is a hokey, mathematically impossible internet hoax that has managed to cause a small segment of simpletons to be terrified of clouds. "even if it was a contrail it would still come from an air craft which proves the point that its being conditioned and normalised" You can't "normalize" a contrail, as they have been normal by themselves for more than 80 years. " where it has no business such as Wild West video games" Yeah, because a fictional video game is the standard by which we base the context of our reality. WHO CARES??? It's a freaking video game. Grow up. "Your dumb." Says the online conspiracy troll that doesn't even know the difference between a possessive and a contraction, which any 3rd grader could tell you. The irony of that is just WAY too precious.
Accidentally got too close to one a couple of times. Once, an updraft rolled me hard right. Put in full left aileron and was STILL rolling right for a brief moment. A rush isn't exactly how I would describe it.
Cloud seeding doesn’t affect the amount of sun you get. If anything, it would potentially make it sunnier as the premise makes the cloud deplete sooner.
The major hazards encountered in the use and handling of silver iodide stem from its toxicologic properties. Toxic by all routes (ie, inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact), exposure to this odorless, light yellow, crystalline substance may occur from its use in seeding clouds for rain-making, as a photosensitive agent in photography, as a local antiseptic, and as a chemical intermediate. Effects from exposure may include skin rashes, conjunctivitis, argyria (a permanent ashen-gray discoloration of skin, conjunctiva, and internal organs), headache, fever, hypersensitivity, laryngitis, and bronchitis. Exposure should be minimized by engineering controls (eg, local exhaust ventilation, or process enclosure). In activities where over-exposure may occur, workers should wear impervious clothing, gloves, face protection, and a self-contained breathing apparatus. Such clothing and equipment should be removed before leaving the worksite. Skin that becomes contaminated with silver iodide should be promptly washed. Eating and smoking should be prohibited in silver iodide work areas. Silver iodide may form explosive compounds with sodium, potassium, acetylene, ammonia, and hydrogen peroxide. Silver iodide should be stored in cool, dark areas, away from the above materials. Before shipping silver iodide, consult with the regulatory requirements of the US Department of Transportation. For small dry spills of silver iodide, collect the material and deposit in sealed containers for reclamation. Before implementing land disposal of silver iodide waste, consult with environmental regulatory agencies for guidance.
Not all clouds produce rain. Very few of them do. This video is about cloud seeding, which is the process of taking those clouds that would produce rain and adding more nucleates to increase precipitates in the cloud. Chemtrails are completely different and are based on the visible persistent contrails in the sky, which are ice crystals, and don’t produce rain. Just like cirrus clouds.
Anonymous Guest cool video of planes performing holding patterns in a saturated atmosphere creating racetrack persistent contrails. Still unrelated to cloud seeding.
Anonymous Guest 😂😂😂 journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0005.1 If it persists, the air is saturated. It’s not conjecture. Simple cloud physics.
Because cloud seeding can’t create a rain system. It can only try to add rain to existing rain systems. If there’s no rain in the first place, cloud seeding won’t help.
@@elyjahstark Amen. Can't seed for a rain when it has already been seeded for a drought by drying up the moisture in the atmoshere using aluminum sulphates or other salts.
Yeah because the virus could totally survive being airborne for hours.....also, this video is about cloud seeding, so your comment is kind of irrelevant.
In toxic concentrations.....anything can be toxic to plants or humans if it’s in a high enough concentration. They aren’t using enough to be even traceable over background silver naturally in the environment.
Difference is one is to make rain and the other not rain if done in large amounts. In either case depending on what they are using it can cause serious health issues especially for the immune suppressed. Plant bacteria is what the official patent for ice nucleating calls for. I was actually infected with a plant bacteria in a cyst I had.on my back. Possibly from an infected water well that supplies my house.The cyst became infected after a hot shower with the contaminated water. After I had popped it.
@@johnellingsen8284 Do you have any evidence to back any of the nonsense you just spouted off? How does 50 grams of nucleates spread over thousands of square miles negatively impacted anyone? Let alone be able to be detected by any sampling equipment?
Bro. Seeing planes 10 times larger leaving persistent trails that literally become a thin sheet of whisp that covers the whole sky is not the same as this.
That was the point. A lot of 'chemtrail' trolls try to cite cloud seeding as a source for their 'chemtrail' hoax. It's called false equivalence fallacy, and the video maker is mocking those gullible sheep for their beliefs.
🎯
It's a contrail. It's water vapor. What do you think is coming out of your car's exhaust when you start it cold? Do you think gremlins are putting water in your exhaust? Justifying any of the belief in "chemtrails" is literally leading down the road to paranoid schizophrenia.
Absolutely true. Funny thing is I went to the store and it seemed everyone was in a bad mood. I told Mt wife I bet they are spraying. Sure enough the whole sky was covered. I remember Prince talking about that in an interview and I thought he was a little crazy then but not anymore.
@@royalt3690 You're clearly referring to the contrails that are the sole and entire source of the 'chemtrail' hoax. This video is about cloud seeding. The two have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with each other.
Today I watched five large aircraft turn a clear blue shy into a thin cloud cover.these trails go horizon to horizon -- they are not Con trails.
Why are you talking about contrails? Did you even watch the video?
Seriously? Are you trying to bring cloud seeding into your 'chemtrail' hoax?
100%
Amen to the ginormous difference
They are spraying heavy out of LAX all over Los Angeles county. It effects the way we feel, by limiting our exposure to the sun, while adding heavy metals to leach into the water supply, Also it effects our grow season. Can cause massive floods and other weather disruptions.
God has been watering His earth for centuries. He didn't need our help then and it doesn't need it now. I call BS on this operation.
They must be inconsolable at the news.
If you knew how weather worked you would know it doesn't take a God to make it happen. How weather happens is very well understood. Predicting where its going to take place is the trick.
@Aliving Soul sources (your comment with excesive CAPS) suggests, that you don't have a clue, how anything works, And Are probably, paid by conspiracy theorists
Oh and they don’t tell you the other chemicals they dump on us!!!!
@@carolapress8037 Water's a chemical. Carbon dioxide, carbon, sugar, salt, everything on this planet is a chemical.
This makes me think of the 80's when I used to hear the term "acid rain".
Acid really began raining in the 60s...
@@VersusARCH ohhhhhhhhhhh
Since it was being done over here since the 1970's, the aerosols if they were using sulphates would have greatly increased the acidity of the air during the reaction with moisture.
@@johnellingsen8284 They don’t use sulphates for cloud seeding and in the concentration for the nucleates that are used, you wouldn’t even be able to detect it let along cause acid rain
@@elyjahstark No , they use them for geo engineering / weather modification.
All the pilots know about these sealed containers is what they are told. Has anyone actually taken one of these and analyzed it?
What sealed containers? The silver iodide flares? Not "iodine" 😂😂 It's not hard to check a cloud seeding flare. There is nothing hidden about this industry. It's pretty widespread common knowledge.
@@siouxperb5570 it’s clearly not widespread knowledge if the majority of people think they are condensation trails from airplanes.
@@laudedlonnie3278 If you're referring to the white trails that originate from behind large, high altitude aircraft, those most definitely ARE contrails. A few intellectually stumpy, scientifically illiterate sheep refer to them as 'chemtrails', but that is a hoax. They are contrails. Physics proves this. However, the contrails that are the source of the 'chemtrail' hoax have nothing whatsoever to do with cloud seeding, which is the subject of this video. It is titled the way it is because they are making fun of the sheep that use cloud seeding as false equivalence to try (and fail) to connect it to the 'chemtrail' hoax.
@@siouxperb5570 f physics n popular science which has proven to be wrong multiple times. Y’all take everything scientists do as facts. In 30 years a lot of this so called factual science will be obsolete and wrong. Plus you act like governments can’t control or manipulate studies to their favor.
@@laudedlonnie3278 "f physics n popular science which has proven to be wrong multiple times."
Cite an example.
" Y’all take everything scientists do as facts."
Absolutely not. A scientist, as a fallible human being, can lie like anyone else. SCIENCE is absolutely incapable of lying. It has no bias, no slant, and no vested interest in any outcome. That's the beauty of science. You apparently need to learn the distinction between science and scientists.
"In 30 years a lot of this so called factual science will be obsolete and wrong."
You are actually almost right with this one. Yes, newly discovered facets of science very often undergo revision as new discoveries are made. However, in this particular case, we are speaking about mathematics, which has not really changed at all in human history. And mathematics PROVES (look up the definition of that word, if you have any confusion whatsoever) that the 'chemtrail' hoax is absolutely impossible. If you want to suggest otherwise, you have two options to make your hoax a reality:
1) Name a substance, element or compound, OTHER THAN WATER, that will vaporize at engine exhaust temp, condense at atmospheric temp, and grow in mass in the atmosphere by drawing more of itself upon itself,
OR
2 ) Name an aircraft with a payload capacity in excess of many tens of millions of pounds to be able to carry and spray out a chemical trail of the same mass as a persistent contrail.
Otherwise, your 'chemtrail' hoax is absolutely dead.
"Plus you act like governments can’t control or manipulate studies to their favor."
Never once did I say that. But the peer reviewed Knollenberg study that I reference which proves your hoax to be nothing more than fantasy is beyond reproach, particularly from vacuous trolls like you. Otherwise, man up and point our the flaws in that PEER REVIEWED study.
You may want to look up what peer reviewed means, before you humiliate yourself further.
Regardless, cloud seeding still has nothing whatsoever to do with the 'chemtrail' hoax.
Cloudseeding using silver iodide is one thing...Geoengineering using aluminum oxide, strontium, barium and coal fly ash is totally another. And the tin foil hat term is just another of many derogatory things used to discredit people who do
real research into the reality of it.
Do you have any evidence of geoengineering using those substances and currently employing their strategies? And then perhaps could you correlate it to the visible trails in the sky at the source of the chemtrail belief? Show us that “real research”.
@@elyjahstark Heres two to start with: David Keith here on YT, Geoengineeringwatch.org also...definetely worth looking into, with tons of links to other articles and films.
John Boyles your first reference is just a reference to geoengineering research. I specifically asked you for evidence of geoengineering using the substances you named, and evidence it is currently happening. Geoengineering research is not a secret, but you claimed that they use aluminum oxide, barium, strontium, and coal fly ash and are currently deploying the strategy. Also, what would any of this have to do with the visible trails in the sky that linger for hours?
Your second link is just to Dane Wigington’s website. Is there a specific link on his website you would like to specifically reference to answer the question I asked you?
I’ve looked through many of his links on that page. None of it could be classified as “worth looking into”. It’s just his hub of con artistry where he makes numerous baseless claims he can’t defend knowing full well his followers won’t check the validity of his statements. Let’s go over some links on that page and see. Perhaps we could look through and of the collected samples? Or the patents? Or the section on modern high bypass turbofan engines?
@@johnboyles4101
The Geoengineering strategies that you are referring to (Solar Radiation Management) are with the exception of ground based albedo modification, all entirely hypothetical research proposals. None of them discuss the use of 'aluminium' 'barium' or strontium' although David Keith did discussed the possible use of aluminium oxide Stratospheric Aerosol Injection.
You don't seem to comprehend what these programmes would involve. Stratospheric Aerosol Injection - which Harvard's David Keith is indeed the main proponent of would attempt to reproduce the cooling effect of volcanic aerosols. Again, SAI currently exists in the form of paper based research and in the province of computer modelling. Fortunately, the formidable challenges in respect of logistics, geo-politics, governance and the appreciable opposition both within and outside scientific circles mean that it is very unlikely that even in a last ditch attempt to address climate change, that it would ever be used. There is not even an agreement upon the materials that would best be employed to simulate the cooling effect of volcanic aerosols. Last year an experiment was scheduled that never took place involving a steerable balloon launched 20 km into the stratosphere above the Arizona desert releasing water to be followed by mere kilograms of calcium carbonate - yes, chalk - to subsequently measure dispersion and perturbation. This is your SAI and this is what it looks like...
projects.iq.harvard.edu/keutschgroup/scopex
So a few kilos of water which were never released, compared to the VEI 5/6 monstrous eruption the same year of Shiveluch on the Kamchatka peninsula that you are without doubt unaware of, which caused huge stratospheric injection - alone lofting some 768Gg of sulphate mass up to 12 miles into the atmosphere. Volcanoes produce between 65 and 120 million tonnes of sulphate aerosols per year...which you are entirely oblivious to.
However, let's assume for the sake of argument that SAI had progressed beyond research proposal and computer simulation and was actually being deployed, what you fail to appreciate is that you wouldn't see it at all - far less, resembling a long white trail in the wake of a large commercial aircraft. There are number of reasons for this. The purpose of SAI is to reproduce the cooling effect of volcanic aerosols which are produced by the reaction of gaseous H2S and SO2 with water to form aqueous sulphuric acid (H2SO4). Incidentally, these are also occurring heterogeneously in the Junge Layer. Some aerosols are efficient scatterers but only weak absorbers at solar wavelengths so again - there is much work to be done to evaluate which material will best serve this purpose.
In order to achieve SAI, such a strategy would be conducted in the mid-stratosphere, (hence the name), not in the tropopause and lower stratosphere the regions in which the contrails that you are observing and under discussion in this video occur. There is currently no aircraft in existence that could loft the requisite payloads to the required altitudes (65,000 - 70,000ft). Moreover, such a programme would be likely equatorial in its location to utilise the Brewer Dobson upper atmospheric circulation patterns; or in polar regions where the required altitude would be lower.
Additionally, and highly ironically, through radiative forcing contrails can actually trap heat which is precisely the opposite effect that the proponents of SAI wish to engineer.
'Chemtrails' are a baseless conspiracy theory predicated upon the misidentification of persistent contrails - which is precisely what this video is addressing. This has nothing whatsoever to do with 'geoengineering' and the only reason that you have heard of SAI in the first place is due to the intentional conflation on behalf of the perpetrators of this hoax with research into Solar Radiation Management in a lame attempt to add legitimacy to their claims. Gullible chemtrail believers such as yourself then uncritically lap up this false equivalence and regurgitate it over the internet without knowing the first thing about the subjects that they claim authority over - far less, basic meteorology, aviation, atmospheric science or geoengineering itself and what it entails. Odd don't you think that the entire fields of atmospheric science, meteorology, environmental monitoring and aerospace engineering worldwide - y'know, the people that actually understand the physics of the atmosphere - remain completely oblivious to these supposed geoengineered 'chemtrails'? - yet a community of online overnight 'experts' armchair conspiracy theorists and self-appointed overnight 'experts' think that they know better because the internet told them so.
Question for you. Given that SAI doesn't exist beyond research paper and computer models, would not form a trail and would take place at double the altitude of the trails that you are seeing in addition to the fact that there is no aircraft currently in existence that could loft the requisite materials into the mid stratosphere, would not even be visible to a ground based observers and has nothing whatsoever to do with the chemtrail conspiracy theory, which concerns misidentified contrails - may I ask you, what precisely is your point?
Evidence? Just look up lol
Hello from Switzerland, we used rockets with the same chemicals to creat rain but that system was abandoned due to lack of efficiency. There was an article in science magazine that this system is actually ineffective.
strange flights!!! ua-cam.com/video/_jmhupvPKJ8/v-deo.html
the people running these projects are dumb af.
@@legalfictionnaturalfact3969 yeah.. They're real "dumb". They're just altering the way weather works. As a kid you use to be able to look up in the sky and see a puffy cloud. Now it looks like complete 💩
@@llamacebu216 .. yeah, like i said.. they are DUMB af. just like DARPA.
@@karllagerfeld4015 not able to see the video in the link.
Yea, messing with nature is a great idea.
thats why we have been having this crazy weather in dallas, even causing tornados and crazy winds
You need to understand this. It’s the devils work.
Are you stoopid this shit is in allot of places fuckt op for the nature but is in some places its good for starting rains foor dry ground not everything is bad about it
Yh i see like fighting jets like military war big jets that leave these trails and they actually spread a man made chemical that harms ure lungs bc after a chem trailed passes a scintist studyed the air and it showed large amounts of the man made chemical it was on a documantary
ꮋꮲ. ꭼχ𐐬ꭰꭵꭺ then you’ll have no problem validating that claim with the actual source. “It’s in a documentary” isn’t good enough. Are you referring to “what in the world are they spraying”? In that case, they didn’t find any abnormal levels of any chemicals and they didn’t find any “man made” chemicals.
It is a chemical trail boy. I bet you won't drink one damn cup. Let me put it in your water for your crops. Leave MAMA alone. Dang
He contradicted himself when he said, “it really depends on what Mother Nature provides”
Has anybody else ever noticed tiny floating like strings that attract to your face while outside and attempting to go up your nose that fell from the sky?
What do spider webs have to do with the non-contradictory statement that you erroneously said was contradictory?
@@siouxperb5570 frfr
@@IllIllIllIllIII frfr?
Hahhahahahahaha this nigga lukus is crazy af
@@arturoescalant7 mans has completely lost it!
Dam you would think some type of electrical disruption would cause more rain...not some chemicals...what about the fact they spray over clear blue skies...without a cloud in sight
GBody Rob they don’t spray over clear blue skies. Those are contrails and they are the product of burning hydrocarbons in extremely cold air.
*YES, we need more of those! We get a lot of Roaches and Rats.... Spray them Roaches and Rats!* 😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️
@@elyjahstark
And again.
Tw3nty Thr33 do you have any rebuttal or evidence to the contrary?
Aegon Aram Why don’t you show us the evidence that she ever stood before the UN.
Hey, its just “silver iodide” no worries, we just help it “rain more”! Suuuuureeee
Tsetsi .... and your evidence for anything different???? Cloud seeding predominantly does use silver iodide at about 50 grams per seeding mission to add nucleates to clouds to help make it rain more. That’s been pretty public knowledge. Feel free to provide evidence of anything different
@Aliving Soul and your evidence for that? What sources? What is their evidence?
@@elyjahstark He's just ignorant and aint got any evidence.
I believe it's the opposite!
We rarely get rain anymore!!
I've lived here over 50 years. Before they started all this, it rained quite a bit. Now? Hardly at all.
Why can't we just leave nature to fend for itself!!!
Quit purposely spraying us!
@@DarHar22 and where would that be? How do you know they are cloud seeding and affecting your area?
Bullshit that’s not the planes I see
Sibyl Matriarch Rising that’s because this video is about cloud seeding. Not the fairy tale belief in Chemtrails regarding the persistent contrails in the sky.
Yes, you are right absolutely. This Man is lying and working for them.or brainwashed also.
Technically...this plane DOES disperse a "chemtrail". So, there's that.
And, just because we are shown a small aircraft used for "cloud seeding", does NOT mean that LARGER aircraft do not "spray" the skies.
One only needs to connect the dots.
These things are happening RIGHT now...as I type.
1) 90 dams in 26 states were removed in 2019. When measured in cubic meters of water, the dams removed in California, Arizona and Washington state rank the highest in serviceable water contracts. FACT.!
2) Citing "Native American rights, and Salmon habitat" those three states have agreed to restore water rights back to Native tribes along specified regions. FACT.!
3) More and more recent articles are showing up on sites like Yahoo, RT, BBC etc...expressing growing concerns over drought conditions in the southwestern United States. FACT.!
4) Media outlets and state officials have released documents regarding water rationing tier 1 beginning in AZ southern counties in late 2021 and stronger tier 2 proposals starting 2022.
Those are just four little dots.
"Cloud seeding" is the string you can use to connect the dots. MY OPINION.!
Federal and State officials agree to cloud seeding contracts with corporations, it's open source material. Two counties in Colorado "seed" to extend ski season. FACT.!
When you understand how warm/hot air draws in moisture, you see that creating larger clouds and cooling the skies means that monsoon rains do not approach when they NORMALLY should...or they are delayed. This means the desert south west is starved of potential groundwater.
Just a coincidence that the mainstream outlets program the masses with fear of drought, while pushing back normal rain fall, smaller cattle and produce farmers closing up shop due to lack of water, and right now Native Tribal lands are somehow blessed by the same policies that destroy the rest of the country.?
Spraying started at 3am over UTAH/ARIZONA border on 6/2/21, forming dense clouds that drifted south, covering most of AZ today. Cooler desert temps won't be drawing any storm weather in from the east. Desert Monsoon activity is based on moisture coming from the eastern states and Mexico at this time of year. If the ground doesn't heat up in AZ, that potential ground water will never arrive.
So, when you start telling people "droughts are likely"...but you're the organization that destroyed the dams that help mitigate the drought because of "Salmon".....and you tell people "drought is upon us", but you're the organization that PAYS to push monsoon activity away from a region...the ONLY thing that adds up, ARE the dots.!!
"Technically...this plane DOES disperse a "chemtrail". So, there's that."
Not one that's visible from the ground, so it wouldn't fit the narrative of the hoax. But you seem to understand that.
"And, just because we are shown a small aircraft used for "cloud seeding", does NOT mean that LARGER aircraft do not "spray" the skies."
No, but physics DOES prove that the contrails that you see, and what some call the 'chemtrail' hoax are NOT sprayed from an aircraft.
@@siouxperb5570 "Not one that's visible from the ground, so it wouldn't fit the narrative of the hoax."
WRONG.!! TRY AGAIN.!!
A Silver Iodide flare rack in operation is ABSOLUTELY visible from the ground. Why would you suggest to everyone here, that it's not.?
The VERY aircraft seen in this video is his 250...but it IS supercharged as well.
Max operating ceiling for this bird is 23,000ft. in favorable conditions, and depending on storm/cloud conditions above 15,000ft.....it toggles around 20,000ft.
ANYONE with good vision can see the 100ft long trail of flare media burning off at 23,000ft. And, poor vision people aided with optics, can see it.
Again, maybe people cannot see the actual Silver iodide condensing water from vapor and doing work....But they can sure as hell see the short trail of cook off from the flares. So, why would you say that the flares("not one that's visible from the ground") cannot be seen from the ground.? YOU'RE BEING INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST TO EVERYONE HERE. WHY.?
"No, but physics DOES prove that the contrails that you see, and what some call the 'chemtrail' hoax are NOT sprayed from an aircraft."
WRONG AGAIN.!!
Your use of circular reasoning or ambiguous statements, doesn't change the laws of fluid dynamics. So, I don't know that you even understand what you're typing.
Again, open source material on GOOGLE. International cloud seeding companies hold government contracts to "SPRAY" different "CHEMICALS" from aircraft.
FACT.!!
Large scale operations include jet aircraft, that "SPRAY" from monitors at the trailing edge of the wings......and sometimes (depending on configuration) from the turbine exhaust nozzle.
"Contrails" are created in two different ways.
1) At the tip of a wing or control surface, due to momentary low pressure in humid conditions.
2) From engine exhaust, where hot engine and compression conditions allow the escape and expansion of compressed water vapor.
Water vapor is what you cannot see....just before it condenses into the white cloud some several feet behind the engine.
FLUID DYNAMICS 101.!! (you're welcome)
Persistent contrails DO expand....but ONLY in HUMID conditions. And, "persistent contrails" may form wispy APPEARING clouds...but are not, in fact, a traditional cloud at all.
A "chemtrail"...is NOT a" contrail". They are two separate occurrences, and they both exist.
So, there is no, "hoax".
Aircraft "SPRAY" chemicals...you CAN see from the ground.
FACT.!!
Some of these chemicals are even mixed within the fuel, itself, forming a "chemtrail" by proxy.
@@billybutcher9912 "A Silver Iodide flare rack in operation is ABSOLUTELY visible from the ground. Why would you suggest to everyone here, that it's not.? "
Because of the mass, and the duration of the burning of the flare. This is demonstrable from a video right here on youtube. The altitude is also FAR lower than the 'chemtrail' hoax, as is the absence/presence of clouds in each situation. Couldn't be more polar opposite of subjects.
You can't possibly suggest that you could see a few pounds of silver iodide burned for a couple of minutes, vs a contrail containing tens and even hundreds of MILLIONS of pounds of ice from one horizon to the other, are you? Please, tell me you're not that obtuse...
You actually demonstrated that you can explain contrails and their formation (correctly, and very surprisingly for someone of apparent cognitive reasoning, so congratulations for that) yet you still think the 'chemtrail' hoax is even possible. Care to reconcile that paradox?
@@siouxperb5570 I've explained in detail how a person of moderate vision can observe the use of Iodide flares, in operation. And, with the use of optics, for people of lesser vision.
If you're going to try and claim the moral high ground....just because you don't focus attention to aircraft in flight...I can't stop you. Some people look up......some don't..and, it's not a defense for you claiming I cannot see well.
I observe military, civilian and commercial aircraft in flight..hours at a time. I look up. My eyes know what to look for. I can see a raw exhaust on a warm day at 30,000ft. with a pair of binoculars. No contrail...no chemtrail, just simple pollution from a moderately efficient engine.
I have no idea what your motivation is, for labeling an obvious and stated goal of releasing particles into the atmosphere, as a "hoax".
Maybe you're simply stating that this particular Comanche is not chemtrailing, in the traditional sense of the widely known facts surrounding "chemtrails".
If this is the case, you might just agree with most people here and state, that, "While I agree that there are chemtrails being left in the skies...this aircraft is not guilty of mass spraying." (something to that effect)
You have done nothing to counter my statements in regards to the contracts in effect, signed by federal, state and local officials surrounding their involvement in weather modification en mass. Why is that.? Is it because the only information you'd find..PROVES actual chemtrails exist.? No one is hiding it any longer. Companies market and advertise worldwide.
"from horizon to horizon".. So, explain to me the paradox you've created for everyone here, to understand.
You stated, "from horizon to horizon". If you expect everyone to believe an aircraft engine is emitting a simple contrail, why shouldn't EVERY contrail be from horizon to horizon, then.? Can't prove a negative.? lol
@ELYJAH STARK Yeah, figured as much. I'm an old hat at spotting them. The trick is to help them waist their time..they never come back with direct answers to questions. That's why I typed "circular reasoning" in one of my responses. They love to ignore the facts and put things out of context. Thanks.
Stop using them in Ohio, we do not need any more rain...And this is not the type of plane that Chem trails come from.
Renee Bode thats because Chemtrails don’t exist. And no one has probably cloud seeded Ohio. You wouldn’t know if they had.
😆😆😆👍🏻so true!
It's time between end of winter and start of summer in India. What is the need to seed for rain at this time?
Since last 2 days they have been spreading and it dint rain and it must not or all crop will be dead.
So it's not for rain sure.
@@elyjahstark you're literally everywhere "teaching" everyone.
@@ddhaval010 How do you know they are seeding? Cloud seeding is definitely for rain. Are you referring to the persistent contrails?
We usually encourage our toads to start croaking for rain. 99 percent of the time it rains. Not kidding.
*YES, we need more of those! We get a lot of Roaches and Rats.... Spray them Roaches and Rats!* 😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️
Jordan Bronson you know those can be food right? It may be disgusting but they can be used to solve hunger, if we had the right instruments!
@@estelaosorio7468 - I know you are not from here, or the City by your post. But the " Term " of " Roaches and Rats " is referring to as People in the City. Hence the " Joke ". 😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️
Exactly man doesn't need to mess with nature. Everything is already needed, just look. We didnt invent fire we discovered it...... Take that in.
@@elyjahstark proof of your lack of understanding.
I can't prove whats hidden by cowards who won't show all evidence for obvious reasons. *hint*, pentagon attacks on 9/11 how many video footage was there? How many got shown? And it's supposed to be the most tragic event on American soil? Again, at least God wouldn't hide information like athiest. But Me, and science can prove this planet would be better off without humans, how is that evolution?
Proof #2 (of your lack of understanding). That's not the same.
The "logic" is God gave us this. What other animal would figure out techs other then humans?.................
In simpler terms, "science is God's blueprint". We're just figuring out what was left for us. And the *elements used* were also natural and non synthetic. I'm answering your question your just faili g to understand, you'd be a remedial class student.
SOME days, like once every couple of weeks, "They" lay down 15- 25 trails across the blue sky, turning it white in 2 hours. The next day is always rainy / overcast. Im annoyed nobody notices this. Southern Ontario Canada.
Dan Urech, you can’t see cloud seeding taking place...so your comment is pointless. Are you referring to the persistent contrails in your sky that are indicative of planes flying through colder and more moist air masses, which are Indicators for approaching cold fronts? (Hence the rain and clouds).
@@elyjahstark yeah i know i went full retard with that one. I deleted it right after i read it and googled cold humid air. I hoped you wouldn't still see it. Thanks for your patience dude. i feel better now and less nutty. You couldve insulted me but you didnt. Very classy cheers
Dan Urech it’s refreshing to see such humility. I’m glad you were able to look it up, question your claim, and then admit it was wrong. Takes a lot more strength than digging your feet in and believing it anyway like most on these videos. Cheers
Looks like you post and respond to yourself.
@@elyjahstark ua-cam.com/users/shortsDJFvt0R6p-Q?feature=share
they get in my way, but at the end he said it’s paid by the counties, I know longer feel bothered at the pilots, I was troubled at this, once a pilot flying those things saw it too, next thing you know 4-5 came out, spooked, maybe even were paid extra just to cover the sky intentionally (but now I know, who’s behind it, it makes sense to me) regardless I walk with the lord and these mean no harm.
Peace to you brother.
Chemtrails are military
Thomas Coffin chemtrails aren’t a thing
@@Cris022 oh really, nice. So dont you how religion and conspiracies work.
Do you believe in conspiracies?
Thomas Coffin if there is evidence to back it up and support it, a conspiracy could be valid. That isn’t the case for The chemtrail theory which has no evidence and contradicts the laws of physics.
Thomas Coffin I don’t believe in the stupid ones (most of them) and I continue to remain skeptical about even the ones with sufficient evidence. Although I don’t care whether or not people believe in them because the have a right to, as long as they are not dangerous to an innocent populace.
Thanks for all the depression you've caused me with your so-called experiment changing what used to be blue skies to everyday gray. God gave mankind beauty and you take that away.
Cloud seeding doesn’t change a blue sky to gray. It only attempts to add nucleates to existing rain clouds to increase rain fall. It was already going to be cloudy and rainy.
Cloud seeding, in it's very designed purpose, will bring your blue skies back SOONER, as the purpose of it is to attempt to increase the onset of precipitation from already formed rain clouds.
It sounds like you're referring to the 'chemtrail' hoax.
@Keith David Which two profiles are you specifically referring to? Can't be me, because I've never heard of at least two of the video subjects you've mentioned. The only hoax videos I comment on are the 'chemtrail' ones, specifically because the meltdown that occurs when you show the trolls that 'chemtrails' are mathematically impossible is far too entertaining to resist. They insist upon not only displaying, but showcasing their scientific illiteracy publicly. I help them along in that endeavor.
So you're clearly speaking about someone else.
@Keith David You're the one that believes in a mathematically impossible hoax, and you call someone else a psycho?
Ironic.
BTW, how many socks are you up to now, Keith? And why do you block me from some?
@Keith David Ok, Keith, have fun. But please, in all seriousness, stop blocking me from seeing some of your socks. You take a lot of the fun out of mocking you that way. I miss Jeff Malone and Ray Forester.
Clever double use of your latest username. Reversal of the Harvard scientist researching SAI, and also your real first name. I knew you had some cleverness hidden there somewhere.
One of my observations for years is that after I see chemtrails in the sky from airplanes at. heigh altitude, couple days later it rains.
What does that have to do with this video?
Contrail persistence is indicative of the air at cruising altitudes getting colder and more humid, which is what happens when cold fronts approach your area. That is why cirrus clouds and contrail persistence can be used to predict potential rain in the forecast. The weather is creating the persistent contrail, not the other way around.
Correlation does not equal causation. For example, every October, the leaves in my area turn orange, brown, and red, and fall from the trees. Then SURE ENOUGH, just like clockwork, within a few weeks, the ground is covered with snow. Therefore, the turning and falling of leaves MUST be the cause of the snow.
You believe in Santa Claus and vaccines too don't you? Try living in CA their seeds don't work there I guess. This story is 100% bullshit.
And generally during the winter months it is the "approach???" of a "cold front" not necessarily rain. Which does not match the cold front properties of a continental cold air mass from the arctic like it used to.
Yes, I've been seeing this for years, weather manipulation just like the news
That missing paint on the rudder bothers me SO BAD. Make him paint it! I demand it! =P
Great! So we increase rain while increasing our exposure to heavy metals. Pretty sick thinking
No, Agl is not a heavy metal (although the silver ion is). Neither are potassium iodide, dry ice or liquid propane which have also been used as cloud seeding materials. The silver constituent of Agl is merely an impurity arising from photosensitivity. Because silver iodide and not elemental silver constitutes the seeding material, the claims of damaging environmental impact have been found to be insignificant by peer-reviewed research. The negligible quantities of silver generated by cloud seeding, amount to about one percent of industry emissions into the atmosphere. Moreover, accumulations in the soil, vegetation, and surface runoff have not been sufficiently large enough to measure above natural background levels.
@@yassassin6425 I think a few simple questions to ask are, Does it pose a risk to the quality of clean air? Is it a normal, organic substance in the air that we should be breathing? What effect do these substances have on the soil and what is the uptake into food sources? What studies have been done on the effect of these substances on the immune system of human beings? It seems so incredibly intuitive and simple, in the same way that smoking is bad for human health. People knew intuitively long before the Surgeon General put out the warning statement in 1969 about cigarettes, that they were killing people. But because studies weren't yet "conclusive" it was tolerated and ignored. I believe that these substances have an entirely different purpose than rain........specifically as catalysts in the atmosphere for augmentation as well as an inhibiting medium.....I won't comment any further than that....and studies will never be done to determine their effect on the immune system.
@@joegee1000
Thanks for your civil reply.
"Does it pose a risk to the quality of clean air?"
No. Each cloud seeding run releases few ounces of material and is utterly insignificant, I mean non-registerable against ground level pollution. Moreover, it is very unlikely that the air that you are breathing on a daily basis is 'clean'.
"Is it a normal, organic substance in the air that we should be breathing?"
Do you drive?
"What effect do these substances have on the soil and what is the uptake into food sources?"
Zero. As I said accumulations in the soil, vegetation, and surface runoff have not been sufficiently large enough to measure above natural background levels.
"What studies have been done on the effect of these substances on the immune system of human beings?"
Toxicity is chiefly a function of time against exposure, concentration and pathway.
"It seems so incredibly intuitive and simple, in the same way that smoking is bad for human health."
You are comparing direct inhalation of tobacco containing 4,000 chemicals and 70 known carcinogens to a few ounces of Agl dispersed into a cloud at 4,000 feet?
"People knew intuitively long before the Surgeon General put out the warning statement in 1969 about cigarettes, that they were killing people. But because studies weren't yet "conclusive" it was tolerated and ignored."
Absolutely, due to vested interests and lobbying from the highly lucrative tobacco industry. Again, you are overlooking frequency and concentration.
"I believe that these substances have an entirely different purpose than rain........"
Then you would I think agree that several ounces would be somewhat inconsequential.
"specifically as catalysts in the atmosphere for augmentation as well as an inhibiting medium...."
Then you would need to demonstrate precisely how a few lbs of Agl, KI, C3H8...or dry ice has the capacity to do so.
"I won't comment any further than that....and studies will never be done to determine their effect on the immune system."
You just did.
If cloud seeding were at all widespread or prevalent then the effects upon public health would certainly be under great scrutiny...not least for fear of legal action and litigation. Unlike smoking, establishing a causal link to the incidence of a health condition however would be virtually impossible due to the virtually negligible quantities of material employed. As I said, there are plenty of impact statements that have been undertaken, some of which have been very poorly executed and vastly over exaggerate the risks associated.
If cloud seeding were to become common practice far from the issue of the materials themselves, the main concern would be the implications of interfering with the natural equilibrium of the atmosphere. The amount of moisture in the atmosphere is determined by the balance between evaporation and precipitation. In the most unlikely scenario that cloud seeding as ever to be conducted on a large scale, it might lead to increased evaporation from locations outside the seeding area - rain falling in one place would have fallen somewhere else. However, atmospheric budgets suggest that cloud seeding is unlikely to steal moisture from downwind sites because clouds represent a modest portion of the moisture in the atmosphere, a cloud-seeding effect of 15% would only remove about 1-2% of the total water vapour in the seeding area.
@@yassassin6425 Thanks for your comprehensive and obviously well informed reply here. You spoke to every question I posted, and have resolved all but a few things in my mind. I'll post those later, no time now. Thanks for taking the time Yassassin, much appreciated
@@joegee1000
A pleasure - and thanks for your civil and constructive replies.
Cloud Seeding and geoengineering *(aka chemtrails)* are two entirely different things. They have almost nothing in common other than planes being involved.
Then why are you commenting on this video? Also, what planes are used for geoengineering proposals, considering they need to release payloads at 65k feet in altitude and research is still in computer simulation modeling?
You are partially correct. Cloud seeding, geoengineering (SRM/SAI research) and persistent contrails (the physical source of the 'chemtrail' hoax) are THREE completely different things. At least you've managed to separate ONE of the false equivalence fallacies from the hoax. Keep going, you'll get it.
@@siouxperb5570 persistent contrails. I love you normie tv minded fools!
@@elyjahstark because the video is correlating the two dummy
@@ragnarokruner2168 No the video is making fun of chemtrail believers who correlate the two, “dummy”. Did that go over your head? Do you also not understand contrail persistence? I love you gullible, ignorant, scientifically illiterate, close-minded chemtrail believers desperately trying to confirm your anti-government bias in whatever magical, physics-defying way possible.
So only 2 flairs per thunder storm cell and makes it rain? Wow. Wonder what the maximum and minimum amount of rain they get per cell / per flair? Very interesting Paul. Oddly enough, I don't think I've seen one of these before.
no 1 or 2 per run. they make up to 60 runs per cloud.
ua-cam.com/video/rf78rEAJvhY/v-deo.html&ab_channel=DaneWigington
What is barium and aluminum used for? To remove gases from a vacuum tube🤔
It’s not
@elyjahstark I have seen you in most comments. This makes me wonder why you defend it so viciously? I know that it is the 2020s, and we are not allowed to ask questions about anything(virus, vaccine, 9/11, war in Ukraine, Israel...) but come on, don't you have any sense that they might be lying??
So how does that rig affect the flying qualities of the plane?
Probably just a little drag, which likely causes a decreased maximum airspeed and increased takeoff rolling distance.
Probably not much if anything not exactly a bomb attached
Silver iodide is dispersed via at least four methods--[1] aircraft (as shown in this video), [2] burn sticks containing silver iodide, placed in desirable spots on the ground, [3] rockets (they are often also fired in order to prevent the formation of crop-damaging hail [some tea growers also use them], sometimes with radar-reflecting "needle" wire dipoles scattered through the silver iodide, to enable tracking of the release points; some hail rockets are at least partially reusable), and [4] surplus AA (antiaircraft) guns, whose shells contain silver iodide instead of high explosive. The Chinese make extensive use of cloud-seeding AA guns, whose shells' fuzes can be set to burst at any desired altitude within the guns' altitude capabilities.
@Aliving Soul Other sources say that you are a fool.
@Aliving Soul very interesting.
@@oscarb9139 You might want to research EVERGREEN. They are a nefarious organization.
And the aircraft that are producing chemtrails fly at a much higher altitude and they are unmarked aircraft. I speak from personal experience.
@@dss9775 Personal experience of what? Are you a pilot? You know that Evergreen went out of business in 2014, right?
@@oscarb9139 😎
Cloud seeding is such 1940's technology! The following is a brief summary of rain generating activities by US government and allied nations. Some details are vague or purposely omitted.
Since the mid-1990's the USAF along with other agencies such as NOAA have been using a range of radio frequencies both to generate or prevent rain. So-called chemtrails are essential to RF methods of weather control. Aerosols are used both as chaff for radar targeting, and condensation nuclei to prime the atmosphere over a targeted region. (They also cause atmospheric warming by-the-way.)
Every NEXRAD site is integrated into a weather control grid and directed by computer “forecast” models. By chemtrailing a region to be targeted, 2 or more radar beams can be precisely aimed and crossed to effect atmospheric conditions over an area of 250 square miles or more. This is done with heterodyning, where 2 or more slightly different frequencies interfere to generate a lower frequency. As a general rule frequencies (SHF and higher, 3-170 GHz) disrupt condensation, and frequencies (HF and lower, 3-30 MHz) cause rapid condensation. There may be other frequency bands in use or under research, but according to specifications and observed effects, these are primary. The effects of heterodyning can often be seen in standing longitudinal waves in clouds which appear a few hours or minutes before a rain event.
A full explanation of this topic could take hundreds of pages.
Best explanation I've ever heard, much appreciated 👍👍
And would be complete bunk. Please cite your sources for your claims.
Thank you so much. I'm waiting for Elijah bot to post on this and harass you for evidence. I guess what you've posted is so damning that it, the bot, doesn't want to draw attention to what you posted.
How about some citations about these “facts”. Most of what you say sounds like fancy words with no supporting evidence. If you don’t want to type out an explanation (please don’t) you can provide links to supporting documents. We await your answer!
@@oscarb9139 Hey my so called pilot try this on:
Do you affirm under penalty of perjury that no atmospheric aerosol injection of any kind is taking place?
Do you affirm under penalty of perjury that you are not being paid or commanded to post comments online?
So if it's just cloudseeding WHY didn't/haven't THEY been explained this to the people years ago.
And why is it called a mission??
Haten Onme They have, it’s just that you didn’t know about it. Your extent of knowledge does not reflect the knowledge of “the people”
@@Cris022 kool...so why is it called a mission??
@@hatenonme1212 It just means a flight operation of an aircraft. Any flight is a mission when it has a planned purpose.
Willem what is not cloud seeding?
@@bovineone .........ANY flight is a "mission" if it has a PLANNED purpose.
Learned more in all the comments for this video than the video itself.
Careful what you learn. Look what school did to almost everyone!🤮
Nice try to prove chemtrails by presenting a cloud seeding plane which has nothing to do with it.
@Aliving Soul `Sources suggest that writing in CAPITALS is a cover for the lack of arguments.
It’s not nothing to do with it the seeding program he is doing adds to atmospheric moisture and we all know what tornadoes are and they’re small hurricanes so he is feeding hurricanes and storms and tornadoes
@@tonetwice8548 Disregarding the complete inaccuracies in your post about tornadoes, cloud seeding actually deters large storm formation that creates tornadoes and hail. By increasing the moisture of the system at the right time, the cloud will release the rain quicker and a storm won’t build up. That’s why farmers try and use it to limit storm destruction to their crops.
Unfortunately, the use of silver iodide has been linked to numerous health risks, including toxicity, reproductive disorders, developmental defects, and cancer. Symptoms of silver iodide toxicity include coughing, wheezing, and difficulty breathing.
Do you have any evidence of any concentrations in any toxic amounts? Or any measurable amounts anywhere?
These are not chem trails and you didn't even explain way they do this seeding.
K B congratulations! You figured out the title was a joke! And yes, they did explain why they do this seeding.
This is likely cloud seeding for rain production, not aerosol injections for solar reflection.
@@elyjahstark f u
@@elyjahstark explain the difference? Burning salts (chemicals) to manipulate the weather.
CHEMTRAILS
@@brettharter143 Chemtrails are defined as the name ignorant people call the persistent visible trails across the sky behind airliners. You know, those big white lines you see that occasionally can persist and spread?
Cloud seeding is the process of using light aircraft flying directly into or around rain systems at lower altitudes without leaving a visible trail. Pretty different.
If your definition of a chemtrail widens to include planes spraying chemicals, then you’ll also have to include crop dusters, aerial fire fighting, stunt shows, etc.
At this time the UK is experiencing a heatwave, day after day of blue skies for weeks. For the first few days there were no plane trails, the sky was bright azure blue, visibility; excellent, my windows were clean, the air was a pleasure to breathe & while bike riding my mouth remained moist.
Then it started; day after day after day of 24 hour plane trails which merged & covered the sky. In the next few days the haze descended to earth & it has remained as the plane trails have continued (I live by the coast and the visibility is easy to see across the bay). The sunshine is now hazy, the visibility is poor, the air is not pleasant to breathe, while bike riding my mouth constantly dries & my windows that were clean are now covered with a film of fine white/metallic dust.
This sequence of events is nothing new to me, I have seen it time & time again so is it really that surprising that people conclude that it is actually particles rather than moisture droplets or ice crystals?
So the approaching front which causes the contrails you see and the changing weather conditions you experience somehow translates in your mind to man changing the weather with the trails, and not the weather causing the trails? You sure don't understand the magnitude of the power involved in weather systems.
Besides, what does ANY of that have to do with cloud seeding, which is the subject of this video?
@@siouxperb5570 Yay - same instant reply from the same names after all these years. How's the struggle going? - not very well judging by all the comments.
Actually, I didn't blame any kind of source - I simply listed the course of events as they have happened again & again, I didn't even mention "chemtrails".
@@kenny832 "I didn't even mention "chemtrails" ".
Neither did I, so why are you now?
You also didn't explain why you made these comments under a cloud seeding video.....
@@siouxperb5570 what a shill... he contradicts every comment by people that all agree with the same thing plus he has no content or anything and has been on youtube since 06 but he posted a link in his about section about contrails which clearly describe them in a way that clearly differentiates them from what we see happening to jets which is not condensation of the wakes of the craft but giant plumes in the middle of the summer sun right in line with the hot engines which promote superfreezing at high altitudes with the right pressure. Thats why jets spray them at 42k feet one day and maybe 38k feet the next day... This guy is obviously a paid shill. No one trolls the topics they think are foolish conspiracies only agents do. They work hard to control the narrative dont they... dont you Siouxperb.. Who do you work for Al Gore?
@@ryanwyrick6947 Why do you think contrails are 'chemtrails' when that is physically impossible? Do you enjoy getting mocked for your declared belief in magic? And why are you talking about 'chemtrails' (which are contrails, proven) in the comment section of a cloud seeding video? Do you not understand the vast differences between cloud seeding and the 'chemtrail' hoax? Would you like to get into it? Because I have no issue embarrassing you by exposing your ignorance on this and other associated subjects. You clearly know absolutely nothing about aviation, nor atmospheric science.
You've read the pdf on my "about" tab, right? How can those contrails that weigh many tens of millions of pounds from a single aircraft be a 'chemtrail' sprayed from the payload of any aircraft?
Let's hear the answer to that, troll boy.
Cloud seeding and the AVweb jingle!!
I'm ready!
*OMG, they spraying over my house today... LOOK:* ua-cam.com/video/OWxpvkPfhiM/v-deo.html
Cloud seeding and chemtrails are different
Correct. Cloud seeding is just the false equivalence fallacy that chemtrail believers like to use to defend their belief that the persistent contrails in the sky are anything but water condensation.
"who pays for it? "... That got a bit awkward 🤷♂️
George sorros and other elites, why do you think they have bilderberg meetings? to test the new brands of skittles together? Pretty soon we will be paying for it with carbon tax and clapping our hands when they gov says they will spray the skies to cool the planet and save it.
I'm surprised the scripts running this channel didn't post all over this comment!!!
Waxman Great. Where is your evidence?
Anonymous Guest I am surprised too! The reason why is that IT DOESNT HAPPEN! Wow, nice to get that off my chest.
@@oscarb9139 Maybe because I start talking about JTRIG and their online strategies right from the start. Could also be the script programmers do not have a good way to deal with challenges to go live and show a face to an account name.
He's a cloud seeder not a chem trailer.
There is no Trinity
There are quite a few differences.
1) cloud seeding trails aren’t persistent and only last a few feet mainly from water vapor from the flare combustion.
2) cloud seeding is done right next to or above or below developed rain systems.
3) cloud seeding usually uses silver iodide or dry ice, not the aluminum, barium, and strontium you usually hear.
4) the silver iodide sprayed measures in the range of hundreds of grams, where 1 gram can nucleate over a million ice crystals.
5) none of the silver iodide is in high enough concentrations to be traceable by rain water, river water, or air quality tests and is definitely not reaching levels of toxicity. You aren’t being poisoned by it and neither is anyone else.
There is no trinity
Pay no attention to stark as you can see he’s a gubment shill and he loves his job shilling!
Stop Censoring me says the guy that fails to ever produce any evidence for any of his claims. The irony never stops with you. If you had taken the time to get off your lazy ass and go verify any of the claims I made, you’d be able to see whether they were true or false and not make yourself look like such an idiot all the time.
Stark
Are you done calling me names and ridiculing me? Feel better? You still a shill doe! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Stop Censoring me another wasted comment proving how much of a moron you are. Do you have evidence yet for your claims or do you want to embarrass yourself again here like you did in the other threads?
yo i flew with this guy this is nuts..
So disappointed.... I wanted to see Paul go with him on a mission.
Flying towards a thunderstorm with your wings on fire, not surprised he passed on that adventure
Same here
@@daveshaw9344 boring
me too
God is coming
Crooked cop block nah. He’s abandoned us.
Hail Satan
Zareh Kantzabedian no he didn’t his plan is working out exactly
@@crookedcopblock4836 AMEN !!!
MARANATHA 🙏🏼♥️🙋🔥🕊️
@@zareh805 God is with us look for Him you will find Him He will never abandoned us
Paul, you got people talking. Good video.
*OMG, they spraying over my house today... LOOK:* ua-cam.com/video/OWxpvkPfhiM/v-deo.html
It’s not a good video. It’s bullshit. This is NOT what they’re spraying from the ridiculously higher flying VERY LARGE jets.
They use jet planes for chem trails. These are not the same type of planes. I live in the Pacific northwest where it rains the most in America and I see them any day that the sun actually comes out. They are not cloud seeding. I don't obviously know what is going on up there, but it's not cloud seeding. This guy needs to look into this more.
That's the joke. The point of this video is to mock the idiotic sheep that try to use cloud seeding as a false equivalence to justify their 'chemtrail' hoax.
I agree
I see the other troll siouxperb5570 is here Elijah's minion. Anyone who makes a video to mock someone is evil which means any of their info can't be trusted. They are most definitely doing something to the weather and it isn't just cloud seeding.
@@justme9338 And you have evidence to back up that claim?
@@justme9338 Oh, you want all your personal info posted on here? Act like a troll, you'll get burned, Melinda. Care to push your luck?
Actually, I've researched aerial spraying for decades.
Chem trails are NOT the same as cloud seeding(weather manipulation).
One uses aluminium oxide and other metals and chemicals and sprays over populated areas affecting plant life, soil, water and the population. Fertility and immune system damage are 2 common side effects. The chemicals used vary based on the brand or recipe used. This is usually sponsored by private companies and /or corporations (likely leading back to the medical industry).
Cloud seeding is basically making clouds density higher thus increasing the chance of precipitation in the designated areas. This is sponsored by local counties and government.
Don't be fooled or confused into thinking its all the same. It's not.
Also, Don't try to confuse people with bad info and titles. Thanks
No one was trying to "fool" anyone. The uploader titles the video this way, partially to mock the 'chemtrail' trolls who fell for the hoax, and partially because those same trolls often use cloud seeding as false equivalence to attempt (but fail) to legitimize their hoax.
The 'chemtrail' hoax is nothing more than the misidentification of persistent aircraft contrails. The laws of physics unquestionably prove this.
What happens if accidently spilling Silver Oxide on bare skin? Will it draw the moisture out of it?
Mmm yummy aluminum and mercury and barium
Uhhhhh no, they are silver iodide flares releasing about 50 grams to nucleate existing rain clouds. Did you even watch the video?
TOXIC SKIES: A New Manhattan Project -- Peter A. Kirby
ua-cam.com/video/Je5KRh-1wdc/v-deo.html
Anonymous Guest still holding patterns. Also nothing to do with the video in cloud seeding. Cloud seeding doesn’t leave a visible trail and they don’t fly in racetrack patterns in clear sky, rather directly next to existing rain systems.
@@elyjahstark Your claim of holding patterns is baseless. You have made an ascertion WITHOUT any evidence to support it.
Anonymous Guest no, YOU have made an assertion with no evidence. I’ve provided you evidence on why the planes are flying in racetrack patterns. You are more than welcome to present evidence to the contrary.
If chemtrails are actually a real thing, then why do we spray for mosquitoes and do aerial crop dusting at low altitudes? It’s because chemicals evaporate at high altitudes.
Because you only want to work for your own field may be?
Maby these big planes spray waste substances at high altitudes?
NOt if it is a dry powder. Can carry more of it and spread it farther, also stays aloft longer.
@@johnellingsen8284 No plane is capable of carrying the requisite payload to form the contrails being discussed. It doesn’t matter what form it is in. Not even close
The question is what after effects it has on the environment and ultimately on our health.
You found it necessary to delete an entire thread this time Keith. 🤣
I like his most recent comments where he claims that he himself (with his new profile name) is an agent and harassing people
Every time we get a bright blue sky these days over here, planes start playing tik tak toe with their trails in the morning. They spread out, form clouds out of nowhere, and sure enough, the sun is gone in the afternoon.
Whatever they're doing, it's not just cloud seeding. I'm just not sure if they want to protect us from the sun since UV intensity has been crazy in the past decades or if they want us to be miserable.
Why are you confusing persistent spreading aircraft contrails with cloud seeding? They have nothing whatsoever to do with each other.
@@siouxperb5570 You're literally checking this comment section at least once per week to answer people like me. I know what you're doing, government drone, and it doesn't work.
@@FlameJackstar "You're literally checking this comment section at least once per week to answer people like me"
Nope. Multiple times DAILY, so pay attention. The entertainment value of watching ignorant, scientifically illiterate trolls that insist on claiming that myself and people like me can perform magic is simply too precious!
"I know what you're doing, "
Anyone who can read can clearly see that. Making fun of idiots by posting factual, verifiable information is not hard to figure out. You're just mad because I called you out for your ignorance.
But, since you're here, go ahead and explain why you are confusing cloud seeding with the 'chemtrail' hoax, which is predicated solely and entirely upon persistent aircraft contrails. Let's hear it, sunshine.
@@siouxperb5570 Hey buddy. these chemtrails are sprayed over our heads every day! and we did not vote for this too happen! every day there's a blue sky Boom chemtrails!
People have gone up and taken samples of chemtrails and bad stuff was in it theres literally planes covering up the blue sky. you need the blue sky it helps you be healthy. wake up
@@Max444-z3f Ooo! Bad stuff, you say. Just where can I find the data on this "bad stuff?" Oh wait, I can't. *_Because it does not exist!_*
Apple podcasts... Chemtrails: the Sky is Falling
What does that hoax have to do with this video? Did you even watch it?
for him to say he's doing that where the meteoroligists want it to happen isn't that like the weather channel makes a prediction that may or may not be true but then these people come in and make it true? it's not even natural to do this and might as well say because people do this you can force a thunderstorm over any place you want even if it wasn't supposed to happen
Beez Saz another naive statement? Cloud seeding doesn’t create weather. He is simply adding a small mass of nucleates to an already developed system to increase rain fall. The weather was already going to happen.
You can’t play with our minds ,we’re not programs kids.😂
Stop climate engineering. Stop Solar geo engineering
Slyart Mehc wrong video, bub.
Elyjah Stark No, I think he’s got the right video. I agree.
Apex Trippy ...cool , but it’s still the wrong video. It doesn’t matter if you agree. This video Is about cloud seeding, not geo engineering. Geo engineering is a field of research looking at ways to temporarily impact the climate and has absolutely nothing to do with this video. Cloud seeding is the adding of nucleates to already developed rain clouds to potentially make it rain sooner and slightly more.
Elyjah Stark You do know cloud seeding is a form of geo engineering right? Cloud seeding does not only cause rain, however it can also halt rain, create snow, and destroy hurricanes. You’re contradicting yourself if your saying cloud seeding is not temporarily impacting our climate. Lol
Apex Trippy cloud seeding is absolutely not a form of geoengineering. Is that a joke? Are you claiming that adding nucleates to a single cloud system will impact the climate?
“It can also halt rain” somewhat. If it is able to effectively nucleate a cloud system, the rain will dump sooner and therefore not grow into a hail producing system.
“Create snow” which is the same as creating rain in different temperatures.
“Destroy hurricanes” completely false. Nice try though adding that one in there. They tried to use it to weaken hurricanes by seeding one side of the hurricane but it was never shown to work. It definitely never “destroyed” any. If that were the case, people would be cloud seeding every hurricane.
“You’re contradicting yourself if your saying cloud seeding is not temporarily impacting our climate” you do understand the difference between weather and climate right? Speaking of contradiction, you contracting yourself by saying the words temporarily and climate in the same sentence. What a joke.
That’s not a chem trail plain
Charles Hatfield made it rain in So Cal and flooded San Diego in 1905. First hurricane was steered in 1947. Russia made it rain on Chernobyl during the nuclear accident to keep the radiation isolated. Weather mod is a big business and all the countries have been doing it for years.
*I'm no doctor but I'm guessing this silver iodide is probably NOT something we should be breathing or taking into our skin when it rains*
And you aren’t...do you understand concentrations and are you aware how toxicity works? If you are concerned, I highly suggest you measure the air, water, and soil and see if you can find any traceable amounts.
Fortunately, you aren’t a doctor.
Yeah and fortunately you guys are dumb enough to think breathing chemicals can't hurt you. Have fun
@@brsrc759 No. We are smart enough to know that chemtrails aren't real.
BRS RC so you couldn’t find any traceable amounts? Figured
C'est partout dans le monde , c'est flippant , dans les films les séries les documentaires , MERDE
MERDE MERDE
We had pink "cloudseeding" yesterday. The trails were bright pink and the sky turned pink. No rain today. What did they seed for? Didn't get cotton candy either.
"We had pink "cloudseeding" yesterday. The trails were bright pink and the sky turned pink."
Let's see, the sky turned pink. It wasn't, first thing in the morning or early evening by any chance?
"No rain today. What did they seed for?"
Have you at any point considered that actually, you are mistaken and "they" didn't do anything of the sort?
"Didn't get cotton candy either."
You mean cumulus? You can surely comprehend that the purpose of cloud seeding is not to create clouds?
@@yassassin6425 No, it was about 3pm in the afternoon and I could see the pink trails - no question, they were pink trails. The sky turned pink as the trails started to dissipate . So they weren't cloudseeding - what were they spraying in the sky? And no, I didn't mean cumulus - I meant actual cotton candy. The trails were bright pink and dissipated into a light pink, just like a cotton candy color. I was hoping they were spraying cotton candy into the sky because alternative ideas is scary.
@@spiritcdl
And peculiarly, you took no footage of this sky turning pink?
Where are you located?
@@yassassin6425 Illinois and I was outside waiting for a ride so didn't. I saw pink skies North East at first and I turned and looked South and South West was the pink trails. I have an older phone and the pictures aren't great but I can guarantee I'm not the first nor only one who has seen this. If you want pictures there are pictures online, just search for "pink chemtrails", pics and even video pop up. I have a feeling you don't believe anything outside of your realm, that's fine if you don't believe me. It doesn't matter, I KNOW what I saw and I know it wasn't cloudseeding.
@@spiritcdl
"If you want pictures there are pictures online, just search for "pink chemtrails"
Confirmation bias much? Ok, let's do that...
www.google.com/search?q=pink+chemtrails&rlz=1C1GCEV_enGB824GB826&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiEv_T6v6vmAhXxURUIHVmVB_IQ_AUoAXoECAwQAw&biw=1366&bih=657
...As I suspected. Contrails at dusk then.
"I have a feeling you don't believe anything outside of your realm"
You mean rationality, logic and reason?
How ironic...spoken from within your online echo-chamber.
"that's fine if you don't believe me."
Known science and the physical laws of the atmosphere are not about belief.
"It doesn't matter, I KNOW what I saw and I know it wasn't cloudseeding."
No one is suggesting that it was. Cloud seeding has nothing whatsoever to do with persistent contrails that have been observed, documented, measured and studied since the early advent of powered flight.
Doesn't show the actual spraying...
No wonder Mother Nature is giving some real good missionary position 2 us
Yeah, disrupt the amount of water that remains in the clouds (make it rain more) then wonder why we have droughts and weather patterns going crazy all over the world; blame it ofon climate change an people consuming to much petrol then tax the hell out of them. Makes sense $$$.
@@Steviewonderisntblind why are you spamming a link to one of Dane Wigingtons videos of baseless claims about the chemtrail theory? This is a video about cloud seeding. Do you not know the difference? Or are you just trolling?
Holy shit are they admitting they spray now?
cloud seeding has never been a secret. There’s nothing to admit. If you are referencing the visible trails in the sky that people misidentify as “Chemtrails” then, no, they are not admitting any such thing.
*YES, we need more of those! We get a lot of Roaches and Rats.... Spray them Roaches and Rats!* 😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️😂❤️
They always sprayed just like croodusters.
@@andrewallace2137 what’s a “crooduster”? Did you mean crop-duster? What does cloud seeding have to do with crop dusting?
@@Steviewonderisntblind why are you spamming a link to one of Dane Wigingtons videos of baseless claims about the chemtrail theory? This is a video about cloud seeding. Do you not know the difference? Or are you just trolling?
What's the efficacy of cloud seeding?
Not very high, I believe. It needs very specific circumstances to have a hope of working, and even then it's definitely not very likely to cause rain. It's definitely not going to create rain in the desert.
However, I'm sure the efficacy of mentioning the words chem trails in a UA-cam video will prove to be very high; before long the weird people will show up saying what they think they have to say 😉
well idk how good it works but I'm just wondering why so many downvotes on this video that just uploaded.
@@y9193 I'm pretty sure most of the downvotes are from the crowd that thinks chem trails are a thing, some nefarious conspiracy theory...
There has yet to be a solid scientific proof that it has any effect. To be fair those things would be extremely hard to prove even if they worked. You never have two identical cases where in one you seed and in the other you don't seed and you compare the results. Too many unknown. It's pretty efficient to get the pilot more hours though, there is little doubt so good for him :)
@@SolarWebsite
They are definitely a thing.
And your definitely ignorant.
This video here will prove it.
ua-cam.com/video/u7zxgEjrBbQ/v-deo.html
Chem trails. Thick in new mexico the last 3 days.
You mean persistent contrails? Wrong video, buddy.
@@elyjahstarkYOU ARE EVERYWHERE!
Talk about making it Rain
💸💸💸🌧🛩🌧💸💸💸
💸💃🏽💸💸💸💸💸💃🏽💸
He said they " stay away or BELOW " the cloud. When you see trails being left, it's JETS and they are either with or ABOVE the clouds.
That’s because this video is about cloud seeding, not the contrails behind jets. Cloud seeding doesn’t leave a visible trail.
@@justme9338 “They need to stop trying to alter the weather” Why should they stop? Do you follow the same logic when you drive your car? Your CO2 emissions are changing the weather. Why are you trolling a cloud seeding video?
Now hurry up and delete and repost your comment like the good little troll you are. I’d hate for you to actually have to answer the questions and engage in conversation.
What trollijah? Cloud seeding or not people need to stop trying to change the weather nature is getting pissed and it's warning us but people think they are so smart and know so much but in reality they do not.
I have witnessed them actually flying thru the cloud leaving a trail. I have a pic to prove it.
@@johnellingsen8284 Then provide it
the earth is a rectangle.....➖
No it's triangle🤣🔺️
Why wouldn’t they do that for area with drought....California could have used this a few years ago.
Bobbie S because cloud seeding can’t create clouds it rain systems. They can only attempt to add rain to already developed systems. If there’s gonna be a drought, cloud seeding won’t help. .... and California has been using cloud seeding for decades.
@@elyjahstark can't they seed an incoming system? Government agent
AdelaideSky uhhhhh that’s exactly what cloud seeding does....did you read my comment troll?
@@elyjahstark so why couldn't they get any rain? Back up your claims please troll
AdelaideSky who couldn’t get any rain? The efficacy of cloud seeding has always been questionable because there’s no definitive way of knowing if the amount of rain in the system increased. Back up your claims please troll.
But I saw and took pics of some today in the Northern California and there certainly wasn’t a storm anywhere within 100 miles and it was a beautiful blue sky day. Plane was a military looking plane not a little RC plane like this 😂and just happened to be coming from Travis Air Force base.
“But I saw and took pics” so you didn’t see cloud seeding then....
Are you referring to persistent contrails, which are completely irrelevant to the topic of this video?
They are spraying us like cockroaches
AdelaideSky ....I’ll repeat my first comment....how would you know? Cloud seeding isn’t visible. And persistent contrails will be there as long as the atmosphere in your area is conducive for formation and persistence.
Elyjah Stark I honestly don’t care. I think it’s funny all conspiracy theorists that say some stuff about this. 🤷♂️😂 the Alex Jones people
Hmm, why not let the weather remain natural. Afraid of the Sun maybe...
yidthescholar what does “being afraid of the sun” have to do with adding rain to already developed rain systems? That tends to empty the rain cloud faster.
Despite what was said in the video cloud seeding is used for more than adding rain. NASA has confirmed on their website that they use cloudseeding to control global warming as well. They also confirm that it is an experiment that could have detrimental effects to the environment. The sun moon stars clouds have been doing their thing for millions of years, humans don't need to alter it in anyway.
yidthescholar cloud seeding is only used to add rain to rain systems. Did you watch the video? That process tends to empty the rain cloud faster, which can lead to more rain in one area, less rain in another, and can reduce hail production by decreasing the likelihood a large hail producing cloud will form.
NASA has not once ever admitted to using cloud seeding to control global warming. You’ll need a citation for that claim and you won’t find one. Are you intentionally trying to deceive people? Or are you ignorantly trying to conflate research into geoengineering with cloud seeding?
Ofcourse they're afraid
@Aliving Soul sources confirm that you have no sources
I remember not too long ago when the riots were going on in Philadelphia.. the biggest rains I ever seen were happening I’m sure the government had something to do with that for sure.. they would make it rain to affect riots and make people stay home.. I always had a gut feeling that the weather can be controlled didn’t know it was actually true that’s brazy
Weather cannot be "controlled". The absolute best theoretical application close to that is cloud seeding, the effectiveness of which is marginal, at best. No one can "make" it rain. Only nature can do that. Cloud seeding simply aims to make it rain very slightly sooner, very slightly more, or to attempt to mitigate hail formation. That's literally all. The idea of "controlling" weather is childish "B" movie science fiction.
Happened all over Australia, and millions are waking upto it
@The Escape Project If you're referring to the silver iodide that act as the condensation nuclei, the answer is no. The rain nor crops are affected. If you believe otherwise, cite the study or hypothesis that asserts this.
The guy looks nervous when speaking about it.
Not really. He did fine.
Well when youtube has to go out of it's way to link a encyclopedia post on a subject being debated. That is simply called manufacturing dissent. Persuading public opinion!!!!
Ricky Ortiz this video is about cloud seeding. The encyclopedia post is simply there because the word “chemtrail” is in the title. The persistent contrails (irrelevant time this video) that you are in dissension with don’t care about public opinion. Maybe pay attention next time before you comment.
@@elyjahstark why are you commenting on every single chemtrails comment, people will think its your jib to spread misinformation, oh wait, it is.
AdelaideSky could ask you the same thing troll. No life? People will think you’re an idiot spreading misinformation and making claims you can’t back up on a cloud seeding video 😂 oh wait, you are.
@@elyjahstark your mum needs to loosen up a bit, she's pretty stiff, bahahaha
AdelaideSky I bet considering she’s not alive....she’s probably extremely stiff. But hey, won’t judge you, everyone has their fetishes. But this explains your mental stability and why you believe in Chemtrails.
Hi guys from cologne germany
They are Spraying us like Bugs
Every day
That's nice.
And then it falls into the ground and then in our water
Well fortunately drinking water is tested regularly, and you can even test it yourself. See if you can pick up any of the 50 grams of silver iodide they release over hundreds and thousands of square miles.
2:09
Something to the effect of
I just wait for a meteorologist to say, You know what? In the next hour, I need you to get airborne and head out to the north, or give me a direction to go, and 'find a thunderstorm and seed it'
WHAT THE FUCK
Do you have a question about how cloud seeding works?
@@siouxperb5570 no
Please let it rain in California all the little pupper doggers will be sad if it doesn't rain in California.
They're engineering it to be dry, but it should be raining. Very odd jet stream patterns. California needs rain.
Tyrrell Davis was gonna say the same, what a joke- it’s Nov 11 and we have had NO RAIN in Ca.
Peter Piper thanks for your reply Peter but I have been a Californian my whole life, for 34 years, and the climate has changed dramatically, I mean DRAMATICALLY in my lifetime and even more the past few years, and the fires we have experienced have only made these changes more obvious. Please don’t talk to me about my own experience as a native of this state. California is a huge state and the weather is different all up and down it so I wonder as u are explaining this to me what part of the state u are referring to? Not where I am from. I’m not sure what your point is but arguing that our climate is not changing is just silly and everyone is beginning to share concern. Have a nice night.
Climates have always changed. The Sahara Desert used to be a savannah grassland with lakes. Get a slight change in the axis of the earth (which is what some scientists believe happened several years ago but you don't hear much about it for some strange reason) and all of California can either become a desert or a tropical rainforest with no way for humans to stop the change.
02-NOV-2019 at 3pm Eastern approximately 5 miles north of KPDK I observed 3 Chem Tails being layed out. The sky was clear at the time.
@Ty K you say it's not true that people get paid to put salt into the sky?
Posi P Cloud seeding and contrails are unrelated phenomena.
You saw 3 contrails being laid out. End of story.
@@Willaev no, because they were not in the level in the atmosphere that was cold enough to freeze. Are you taking the test?
@Bogusbits How about you research the topic before your hurl insults.
"revealed". Yeah its only been very public knowledge since the 1940s. And NOW you found out. Great job Sherlock.
That's the joke. The video title is mocking the 'chemtrail' sheep that try to use cloud seeding as false equivalence for their hoax.
@Jeff Malone Dihydrogen monoxide?
Hey, kriss, did anything that I said constitute harassment in any way? Or did I simply clarify what the title of the video is intending? Our confused friend here is having trouble with word definitions.
@@siouxperb5570 A chemical term for plain water.
@@kriss3d Shhhhhh.......Jeffy thinks he found a "smoking gun" document that shows dihydrogen monoxide in these trails, and he's trying to provide this as nefarious "proof" of 'chemtrails. Don't ruin this....it's WAY too entertaining.....
Its called geoengineering there's no conspiracy If you can't clearly tell the difference between a contrails of crystallized water vapor that extends up to a few miles behind a plane that melts within minutes and a particle trails from geoengineering projects that extend across the whole sky lasting for hours as they slowly expand into a thin haze that remains in the sky all day you need serious help
No, this is called cloud seeding. It has nothing to do with any geoengineering research. And definitely nothing to do with the contrails you seem easily confused by.
@@elyjahstark wow you obviously don't know s*** geoengineering or climate engineering has many of categories the main one being supposably solar radiation management so whether it's Sai or so-called cloud seeding they're all forms and techniques of weather manipulation which is climate engineering/ geoengineering
@@wiseup7908 How adorable. Someone who doesn’t know anything about cloud seeding or geoengineering telling someone else they don’t know anything. Couldn’t be any more ironic. You really should research both subject and learn the differences between the two. Weather manipulation is not climate engineering. That’s a hilarious assertion. Adding a slight amount of rainfall to an existing system does not impact the climate. The amount of energy required to change the climate is far more substantial. You’ll learn eventually
Keith Seigel.
Last week in north Atlanta I seen atleast 5 trails....and no rain since ...so wtf is it for real
GBody Rob cloud seeding trails aren’t visible. You are seeing contrails.
Lmao it's chem* trail,
Marcelino Silva no it’s actually not. Good effort though.
This is just bullshit to make you look the other way. What about the military jets spraying in the blue skies where there isnt a cloud within 1000 miles.
Jratracer69 what military Jets would those be and why does it matter that there is no other cloud in the sky?
geoengineering is not clowd seeding
And geoengineering has nothing to do with a long white trial in the wake of a jet airliner either.
So why they normalising it then? There’s chemtrails even in video games such as Red Dead Redemption 2 a prequel to RDR1 which was made 8 or so years prior. RDR1 didn’t have chemtrails implemented but RDR2 did. This is a Wild West game set in 1899 before the invention of airplanes so what business do they have in a wild western? And why go out their way to implement it into the graphics to try and “normalise” this if there isn’t anything sinister behind them.
You're conflating contrails (the source of the idiotic 'chemtrail' hoax) with cloud seeding. The two subjects are completely unrelated.
@@siouxperb5570 contrail and chemtrails are different and even if it was a contrail it would still come from an air craft which proves the point that its being conditioned and normalised where it has no business such as Wild West video games that a lot of young naive individuals play. Your dumb. Wake up.
@@SHEPARD22 "contrail and chemtrails are different"
Yes, one is real, one is a hokey, mathematically impossible internet hoax that has managed to cause a small segment of simpletons to be terrified of clouds.
"even if it was a contrail it would still come from an air craft which proves the point that its being conditioned and normalised"
You can't "normalize" a contrail, as they have been normal by themselves for more than 80 years.
" where it has no business such as Wild West video games"
Yeah, because a fictional video game is the standard by which we base the context of our reality. WHO CARES??? It's a freaking video game. Grow up.
"Your dumb."
Says the online conspiracy troll that doesn't even know the difference between a possessive and a contraction, which any 3rd grader could tell you. The irony of that is just WAY too precious.
Wow amazing. I wonder what it's like flying up beside a storm? I bet it's a rush.
Accidentally got too close to one a couple of times. Once, an updraft rolled me hard right. Put in full left aileron and was STILL rolling right for a brief moment. A rush isn't exactly how I would describe it.
why did u have to say chemtrails, you've brought out all the scientists-gone wrong
We now have shitty summers thanks to this weather manipulation. Almost no sun last summer. This is criminal.
Cloud seeding doesn’t affect the amount of sun you get. If anything, it would potentially make it sunnier as the premise makes the cloud deplete sooner.
The major hazards encountered in the use and handling of silver iodide stem from its toxicologic properties. Toxic by all routes (ie, inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact), exposure to this odorless, light yellow, crystalline substance may occur from its use in seeding clouds for rain-making, as a photosensitive agent in photography, as a local antiseptic, and as a chemical intermediate. Effects from exposure may include skin rashes, conjunctivitis, argyria (a permanent ashen-gray discoloration of skin, conjunctiva, and internal organs), headache, fever, hypersensitivity, laryngitis, and bronchitis. Exposure should be minimized by engineering controls (eg, local exhaust ventilation, or process enclosure). In activities where over-exposure may occur, workers should wear impervious clothing, gloves, face protection, and a self-contained breathing apparatus. Such clothing and equipment should be removed before leaving the worksite. Skin that becomes contaminated with silver iodide should be promptly washed. Eating and smoking should be prohibited in silver iodide work areas. Silver iodide may form explosive compounds with sodium, potassium, acetylene, ammonia, and hydrogen peroxide. Silver iodide should be stored in cool, dark areas, away from the above materials. Before shipping silver iodide, consult with the regulatory requirements of the US Department of Transportation. For small dry spills of silver iodide, collect the material and deposit in sealed containers for reclamation. Before implementing land disposal of silver iodide waste, consult with environmental regulatory agencies for guidance.
Copied right from the SDS sheet. Pretty mild stuff.
Let me know if you ever find any over exposure from silver iodide due to Cloud seeding. Unless of course you are handing the flares yourself.
If this is true, with the hugh amount of chemtrails in the sky, it would be raining all the time.. NEXT
Not all clouds produce rain. Very few of them do. This video is about cloud seeding, which is the process of taking those clouds that would produce rain and adding more nucleates to increase precipitates in the cloud.
Chemtrails are completely different and are based on the visible persistent contrails in the sky, which are ice crystals, and don’t produce rain. Just like cirrus clouds.
ua-cam.com/video/Je5KRh-1wdc/v-deo.html
Anonymous Guest cool video of planes performing holding patterns in a saturated atmosphere creating racetrack persistent contrails. Still unrelated to cloud seeding.
@@elyjahstark That is conjecture, not evidence. Do you have measurements of the saturation?
Anonymous Guest 😂😂😂 journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0005.1
If it persists, the air is saturated. It’s not conjecture. Simple cloud physics.
Perfect excuse , remember guys don’t just spray me Burium !
If this ACTUALLY worked then why is Cali and AZ still in a severe drought?
Because cloud seeding can’t create a rain system. It can only try to add rain to existing rain systems. If there’s no rain in the first place, cloud seeding won’t help.
@@elyjahstark you ran away. We won
@@elyjahstark Amen. Can't seed for a rain when it has already been seeded for a drought by drying up the moisture in the atmoshere using aluminum sulphates or other salts.
@@johnellingsen8284 Yeah, that’s not how aluminum sulphates and salts work 😂😂 But good effort. Keep holding strong with those chemtrail delusions.
@@elyjahstark You bet. Can you answer how they work ?
My stepmom said it makes you stupider
Cloud seeding makes you stupider? How so?
@ELYJA SON LOL
I wonder if "corona" came from our local US military labs to airplane contractors
Yeah because the virus could totally survive being airborne for hours.....also, this video is about cloud seeding, so your comment is kind of irrelevant.
They said humans goin 2 play god
Some day
humans R stupid
*OMG, they spraying over my house today... LOOK:* ua-cam.com/video/OWxpvkPfhiM/v-deo.html
"Chemtrails aren't real", "Okay, they are real but it's JUST silver iodine"............ hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
It's silver IODIDE, and I think you missed the point.
A disgusting face anatomy as I expected. We need harsh penalties for beurocrats who played role in this. And not just in the US but entire West too
Cloud seeding has been done for the last 75+ years. It has _never_ been a secret.
you should look into what silver does to plants, we use copper every day.
silver inhibits plants reproductive cycles and confuses them.
In toxic concentrations.....anything can be toxic to plants or humans if it’s in a high enough concentration. They aren’t using enough to be even traceable over background silver naturally in the environment.
@Jeff Malone Lol
@Jeff Malone hes just panicking. Lol
@Jeff Malone freaking hilarious!
Who's Elijah talking to again? I'm down here on the bottom of the comments.
LOL!
It only took me about 9years to actually find proof that this is real. Thanks
SERIOUSLY!!?!?!?! That is hilarious. Cloud seeding has been common knowledge for more than 6 decades. Where were you looking?
@@siouxperb5570 it's on video putz. Loser. 3 decades on here. We own u
@@random2732 Lol indeed!
Difference is one is to make rain and the other not rain if done in large amounts. In either case depending on what they are using it can cause serious health issues especially for the immune suppressed. Plant bacteria is what the official patent for ice nucleating calls for. I was actually infected with a plant bacteria in a cyst I had.on my back. Possibly from an infected water well that supplies my house.The cyst became infected after a hot shower with the contaminated water. After I had popped it.
@@johnellingsen8284 Do you have any evidence to back any of the nonsense you just spouted off? How does 50 grams of nucleates spread over thousands of square miles negatively impacted anyone? Let alone be able to be detected by any sampling equipment?
With this you can spray canola or corn.