Thank you for the video but I am a little confused (maybe it is just Monday morning though and I have yet to wake up) I work a lot with 16mm reversal Kodak 7242 and the 16mm film you are using seems to have a log look. why is this is it because you are using negative?
Good question, I should've said this in the vid. It's because that 16mm film was scanned as a flat video file. You can different types of scan. I think this was a dpx scan, so I guess it didn't retain any information from the film negative in terms of contrast etc
I'm glad I'm not the only one who sometimes strays away from the 2383 Kodak look. Nice Tutorial 😎
Ha, cheers. Poor Fuji, never gets any love
Thank you for the video but I am a little confused (maybe it is just Monday morning though and I have yet to wake up) I work a lot with 16mm reversal Kodak 7242 and the 16mm film you are using seems to have a log look. why is this is it because you are using negative?
Good question, I should've said this in the vid. It's because that 16mm film was scanned as a flat video file. You can different types of scan. I think this was a dpx scan, so I guess it didn't retain any information from the film negative in terms of contrast etc
@@GreenGoatProductions I presume then that in a case of working with reversal the best way is to grade as I would do just a non log video clip?
@DaveKnowlesFilmmaker I haven't worked with reversal before , so can't be 100%. That does sound about right though.