NEW YouTube Copyright Policy Explained - What They're Not Telling Us About FAIR USE!!!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 лип 2024
- NEW UA-cam COPYRIGHT POLICY EXPLAINED - WHAT THEY’RE NOT TELLING US ABOUT FAIR USE!!! // New UA-cam Copyright Policy for 2019 was announced this week. In this video, Ian Corzine, Your Social Media Lawyer, explains the new copyright rules for UA-cam and gives an overall UA-cam copyright update. He also analyzes the UA-cam copyright policy in terms of whether the new rules impact Creators’ utilization of the Fair Use doctrine. Copyright law affects UA-cam Fair Use and the existence of the UA-cam Content ID claim. Thus, in this video, Ian Corzine describes how to make a copyright claim on UA-cam and makes sure the new UA-cam copyright rules are explained. The better you understand UA-cam copyright rules, the less chance you have of receiving a copyright strike! Thanks so much for watching!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UA-cam Manual Claim Link: ua-cam.com/users/content_id?o=...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🔴 For more law CREATORS need to know, SUBSCRIBE: ua-cam.com/users/IanCorzine?...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
⭐️ JOIN the “Ian Corzine" DISCORD server HERE: / discord
🔵 Get my FREE “Strategies for Avoiding COPYRIGHT STRIKES” Checklist HERE ➡️➡️➡️ pages.convertkit.com/430b450e...
🔥 Check out my video on FAIR USE here: • Fair Use on UA-cam - ...
💟 Watch my video on How to Use Music on Instagram here: • How to Use Music on In...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AUDIO MUSIC & SOUND FX: Epidemic Sound, “Just Good Friends” by CLNGR, June 11, 2018.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
✳️MAILING ADRESS: ✳️
Ian Corzine - Your Social Media Lawyer
3835 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd., Ste. 472
Westlake Village, California 91362
⭐️And also please say "Hi!" on Social Media⭐️:
Twitter: / iancorzine
Instagram: / your_social_media_lawyer
Facebook: / iancorzinehotm
LinkedIn: / ian-corzine
www.iancorzine.com
The content of this UA-cam channel is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You should not rely upon any information contained on this UA-cam channel for legal advice. Viewing this UA-cam channel is not intended to and shall not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Ian Corzine or West Corzine, LLP. Messages or other forms of communication that you transmit to this UA-cam channel will not create an attorney-client relationship and thus information contained in such communications may not be protected as privileged. Neither Ian Corzine nor West Corzine, LLP makes any representation, warranty, or guarantee about the accuracy of the information contained in this UA-cam channel or in links to other UA-cam channels or websites. This UA-cam channel is provided "as is," does not represent that any outcome or result from viewing of this channel. Your use viewing of this UA-cam channel is at your own risk. You enjoy this UA-cam channel and its contents only for personal, non-commercial purposes. Neither Ian Corzine, West Corzine, LLP, nor anyone acting on their behalf, will be liable under any circumstances for damages of any kind.
© 2019 Ian Corzine. All rights reserved.
#iancorzine
#yoursocialmedialawyer - Навчання та стиль
Creators!!! Do you like the new UA-cam Timestamp policy? Or is it just another way they're taking our ❇️ FAIR USE ❇️ rights away?
Ian Corzine Hi Ian, great video. Question, if we are using someone else’s print material online, in our video can we acknowledge that it is someone else’s, state they are the author or source & still use it? Can we only use excerpts or the whole thing?
Thanks!
Thanks SP! It depends on the purpose -- are you EDUCATING or doing COMMENTARY? If so, then use of short excerpts with full attribution is Fair Use. Thanks for watching!!!
Ian Corzine I am doing commentary & tying it in to a bigger story. I assume that is still ok?
I had a over an hour long video of a Cinco de Mayo parade. Recieved a claim for several seconds worth of La Cascabel.
Couldn't swap it or mute it. Ended up cutting it out.
Almost as if the copyright holder didn't want to let go of the possibility of future ad revenue
The tools probably work the same way you erase background noise using Audacity. Maybe it's not perfected. Overall, I've started to focus on quality content over quality video. Just for the sake of avoiding copyright strikes
funny that youtube still didn't want to "split" the ads revenus by length instead... Could be way more fair for all parties. Per example a 15minutes videos with a music of 5sec of BonJovi should not have 100% of the video's revenus. THAT was makes everybody mad about the situation.
I really agree -- yeah, there are some logistics to it -- but I think it would be the most fair. THANK YOU for all your help!
Exactly my thoughts
It's easy to claim that their 5 seconds of copyrighted material is responsible for 100% of the view time, now go argue that in court. Part of the problem is that we small creators have none of that resource to fight egregious claims from copyright holders, especially big corporations.
Agree 100%
“In the old days, that is, before yesterday” - Awesome!!!
Hey Gene! LOL! Thanks so much for tuning in!
Gene Hobbs yea that was brilliant
I laughed so hard at this comment.
That would explain why so many recent videos have “this video has no sound” on them
Hey PP! Totally agree.
This is soooooooo helpful. Starting out, we don't have much money to invest in programs or professional advice. So your channel is ABSOLUTELY a BLESSING to new UA-camrs. You provide answers to key, important issues that most people have NO CLUE. Not only that, you keep us from getting sued, and like you say, Even worse is they take your channel down. Thank you
UA-cam: Copyright Policy
Also UA-cam: Now introducing UA-cam Music and UA-cam TV!
*So, bottom line, policy is becoming a loophole around the law to keep the poor poorer and the rich richer. Got it.*
*p.s.*
*My online souvenir shop if anyone's interested:*
teespring.com/stores/express-shirtself
.
😁👊 That's seems to be the way life is!! Thanks for watching.
yeah and i am can make edit now F for YT
@@iancorzine And of course we all know it's not the way the world ought to be.
Exactly
Thanks, Ian, for being here, and for being timely and on top of this issue. Sadly, I don't think that most creators have any defense against the corporate copyright claimants, fair use or not. Part of it is the reality that the United States court systems are for the rich. Isn't a "manual copyright claim" in UA-cam the equivalent of a Digital Millennium Copyright Act take-down notice? If I dispute a DCMA take-down notice (which I think I would be doing if I disputed a manual copyright claim), aren't the only two responses then available to the claimant (1) go away, and (2) sue me in court? So who has all the money and lawyers? I certainly don't have the funds to deal with a lawsuit. So we just do what they want, whether they are right or not.
Thank you #2 for your other video that suggests a request for retraction first. Since that is one step short of a DCMA counter-notice, it is certainly worth a try (and if through an attorney, even better). A ray of hope!
Hey Tony! Thanks so much for your kind words. Well a manual copyright claim is not the same as the DMCA takedown notice. It’s really more of an intent to take revenue. There is a takedown noticed process but allows the original copyright holder to actually take down your video.
Ha! Thanks Tony!
I feel, after learning about this further, that it is granulizing the fair use, thus limited it. Instead of making more generic protections for reasonable usage of copyright material "fair use," this is heading towards situations where large operations can potentially keep up with this extra effort to remove the "issue," but small creators will have trouble keeping up. Small creators will just start attempting fair use less, which is what they want, watering down their content to stay afloat...thanks Ian, really great stuff, as always
You are always on point when educating....big thanks to you....
Hey KE! Thanks so much for your steadfast support 👊😀 Have you gotten into copyright trouble on UA-cam?
Clicked the thumbnail because for a second I though Johnny Knoxville was going to be giving me legal advice. Stayed for the info, thanks man!
Jamie RX Sucks hey Leonardrose_pro on IG fixed up my suspended channel
The problem: many copyright claims seems to be a scam. I.E. if a creator does not dispute the claim the corporation making the claim simply gets all the money. If a creator does dispute the claim the corporation will wait until the very last day/hour/minute/second to remove their claim and without ever sending a single word of apology. Such claims are not mistakes - they are phishing attempts and therefore they are premeditated fraud attempts. They are only attempts of fraud when the creators dispute those claims, but they are in fact real frauds when uninformed creators don't dispute the claims the the con artists collect the money. This needs to be addressed and fixed, to protect creators.
I have an example:
On one of my channels I demonstrated a piano and played a few bars of music on it. The music I played was the opening to the first movement of the Moonlight Sonata, composed by Beethoven and performed by... well... myself. The company CD Baby Pro Publishing made a copyright claim. If I didn't dispute it they would get all the money. Again, it is not a mistake, it is textbook fraud.
I have so many people share stories just like this. It is definitely companies and/or individuals trying to take advantage of others. It is so sad the a few bad people ruin some good for the rest of us. Thanks for watching AND for sharing your thoughts (and experience). Hopefully you won the dispute. 👊😁
@@iancorzine HI Ian. The dispute resolved in my favor, but I don't think anyone looked at it. The dispute resolved at the very last moment, which leads me to believe that it is an app, not a human. This reinforces my suspicion that the whole thing is a phishing attempt, therefore a deliberate attempt at fraud. The whole thing is just programmed in and they must be raking loads for money from millions of UA-cam creators that never dispute those claims. I am not a legal expert but I would go as far as to say this is a case of conspiracy and racketeering, because it is well thought out. Of course I have nothing but circumstantial evidence, however, nowadays scammers don't necessarily target big payouts that individual victims are likely to report the authorities. There are now plenty of scammers that go after pennies, from millions of victims. At the end it all ads up to millions of dollars. And they can just play dumb, "Oh, there must be a glitch in our system." So, when you dispute they walk away from the claim, when you don't bother disputing they take your money. I might be just a cute little puppet bunny, but I've been around the block a few times.
If there were any way to prove that we could probably save the world. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. 😁 AND congratulations on winning a battle against one of the big guys. You are one of the few success stories.
People, this is another very important and VERY informative video! Thanks again for being one of the good guys out there in utubeland! Marking for later reviewing & study by the way loL
EJ!!! Thank you so much for your kind words!! I so appreciate your support.
What about the DMCA video take downs? Those are the worst because they end up in strikes. Anything being done by UA-cam to avoid those? I got my whole videos taken down for using a few seconds of blurry background. UA-cam should give chance to creators to edit out the DMCA copyrighted content too just like manual claims so we can avoid strikes.
They're even worse because if you contest them, you have to give name, address, number and consent to Federal Court jurisdiction -- know what that means? Big corps with endless resources sue you in federal court. Sometimes I get so PO'ed!
HEY lan I'm regretting every time I skipped ur videos in the recommendation, keep the good work ur videos are so valuable to new tubers
Ur right
true
No one read the ruls
Yes
Waht cc means
Ian this couldn't be explained more clearly than you have just done, i am very interested in what YT will come up with in the next couple weeks as far as a quick edit. As always clear and easy to understand info delivered. 🙏👊✔
Awwh Joe!! Thank you so much for the kind words. Coming from you, a real student of UA-cam and online social platforms, that makes me feel so good. Thank you always for your steadfast support.
@@iancorzine You're the best, thanks.
Hey Eh Joe! When s the next vid coming?!? Love your content buddy!!
@@HollysHappyHour soon took a break and back up now. 🙏
Informative, thanks! I got an automatic copyright strike 2 weeks ago on music I have a license to use. I hadn't realised the company wasnt involved at that stage. It's still outstanding and as of today I qualify to be monetized. Hoping it doesnt affect anything!
Hey P&P! Thanks for watching! Was it a copyright strike, or a copyright claim?
@@iancorzine it was a content ID claim I think. Def not a strike.
Oh, ok, good. Copyright claims don't affect your channel -- you just lose the money for the video.
@@iancorzine thanks! I've desputed it and contacted the company per their instructions in my license, will the money come to me once the claim expires?
Thanks.
No, THANK YOU, DC!
Very interesting. The video I uploaded today was immediately marked as partially monetized...I immediately put it on Private and asked for a manual review. I don’t understand why it was marked as such. Thank you for sharing your knowledge with us. 🤗
Hey Sara! That happens to me all the time. You should transcribe. That way, YT’s computers will understand that your video is totally safe. Give it a minute before you Private it and YT will figure it out.
Ian Corzine great idea! Thank you.
i was reading even the limited ad policy on tobacco products being displayed. omfg.
😲😲
In other words, youtube wants nothing to do with fair use and leans to corporations to get rid of fair use? Which leads means to question what if fair use was completely eliminated from the law because that seems to be the direction we're headed?
Well it’s such a good discussion, isn’t it? Think about it UA-cam actually benefit substantially from the fair use doctrine. If we get real honest with ourselves they make a lot of money with copyright infringement. However they have to get along with the big corporations, and the big corporations heat fair use because they want to be paid for any and all use of their art. So, in my opinion, UA-cam takes measures like those discussed in today’s video, because they want to appear like they’re doing something to help the big corporations.
Thanks for the great info!
Thanks Ian for all of your info! I however am having a hard time with fitting what I do as a paper crafter in this. I know this may seem straight forward for some but I would really appreciate any direction as to whom to talk to about my project I'm currently working on and now hesitant to upload it. Any advice? TY! Jules
You deserve more subs! Your work appreciated and stick to it! You will grow!
Question about a concert. I posted videos from concerts I attended for quite awhile on one of my channels, and NEVER had a problem with any of the artists -- UNTIL I posted one video of an artist singing an old song in a concert.
I was SHOCKED when he hit me with a COPYRIGHT STRIKE! My channel wasn't monetized, I had no desire to profit from his song, I just wanted to share a great experience at a concert.
I DID dispute it however, saying I didn't own the SONG, but I OWNED the ticket to the CONCERT, so I had a right to post it. I never heard back, but I'm certainly disappointed in this artist.
He is worth $80 million dollars. I'm "just" a service connected disabled veteran. This guy could buy and sell me a million times over, yet he got greedy over a song. Smh.
But are we allowed to post videos of concerts??? I mean, we DID buy the ticket to the concert!!! Thanks for any advice.
Around 2005 i used to make videos,i was kind of new,but i used a bunch of clips.i notice movie sights do it a lot,so would it be ok?im making a new sight and wondering what to include or not.i just posted master of illusion,the dance scene was some random clip.is that ok?
Thanks a lot!!!
I don't get it.. so singing a couple of lines from living on a prayer results in copyright strike, but what about all those guitar channels where people sing entire cover songs? why they don't get copyright strikes?
Hi Gert!! Thanks for watching and for reaching out. It all comes down to whether the creator gets his or her money or not. A small YTer will probably get a strike because their channel is not producing any revenue; whereas a big YTer only gets a copyright claim, but is allowed to keep the video up because the copyright owner gets revenue from ads on the channel and additional revenue when the channel is monetized. It always comes down to money. I hope this helps to answer your question. 👊😀
@@iancorzine Thanks.
Another awesome video! Thanks Ian :)
Thank you so much for watching, tennis talk!
appreciate this video a lot, when i go into the studio and see the copyright strike, it kinda highlights a area in like a clear to white rectangle. the question can i make a cut at the start and end of the copyright and get around the copyright, or would i have to delete the whole copyright spot?
Hi JuiceTV. You would have to delete the entire copyright spot. Thanks for watching AND please let me know if you have any other questions. 👊😁
To answer this question correctly from a legal standpoint: In short- youtube does not have the legal right (by contract or otherwise) to determine when and how "fair use" applies- "fair use" is a statutory limitation that youtube can be forced to follow to the letter of the law by federal court order. (noting that the Communications Decency Act does not apply to matters arising under any theory of copyright law.) Simply put- a website cannot "change the law", and copyright law can be enforced to the letter of the law by federal court order against any site that doesn't follow the law. Its also worth noting that federal law requires that sites that violate the first amendment tob be stripped of any and all government funding, or else face litigation under 42 USC 1983.
You made a clear point. Thank you!
Well thank you so much for liking the video. I really appreciate you!
Ian, great information! Thanks. As you know, copyright infringement is more serious than most people realize. If convicted, it can include jail and up to $150,000 fines per infringement.
You are correct!! However, it costs money to bring a lawsuit and most people would just as soon file a take-down request. It is those people with deep pockets that want to "enforce" their claims. You are ALSO correct that it is a serious problem AND I think that is why YT is trying to protect themselves from any kind of future lawsuit. Thanks for watching!! 👊😁
@@iancorzine It's possible that large corporations may pursue some small violators to make an example as a warning to others.
Absolutely!! But, it is more common they would go after larger "fish". They usually just like to scare the small fish. 🐟🐟🐟
i saw disclaimer text on some youtube channels description. "(Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976)". Can you explain about it? Because there are some channel use the same disclaimer text on their videos.thank you
Hi Ian! New here & this is great! Thanks for all the info! Easy to understand and so useful!! Cheers! 👍✔️😀
Thank YOU for watching!! Please let me know if you ever have any questions. Great to have you on board. 👊😁
Ian Corzine likewise! Lately I’ve been getting some great questions from viewers and it’s been a wonderful addition to the channel, cheers! 🥂😀✌️☯️
😁
Hi, Ian. For using some copyrighted material for fair use purposes whether it's commentary, criticism, education, or other transformative uses, couldn't the original copyright owners get in trouble for ignoring the fair use purposes that a UA-cam creator has created?
I received two content id copyright claims on composition grounds on one of my videos: One was for Megalovania, and another was for a metal remix of the same song. Yes, the original Megalovania is playing, but that's because it's in the game's files included with the download from Steam. I had thought since the remix's composition is based on the original, the dispute should go back to the original. Should I dispute it, leave it be, mute most of the audio (because the song is playing for most of it), or take the video down?
*Audio scrub* : Back in January 2014 I uploaded a video titled "The Boring Bus Tour of GTA4 (Xbox360)". Upon upload, the background music was flagged by ContentID as conflicting with a copyright owner. UA-cam offered to scrub out the offending audio or mute it entirely, so I picked the scrub option. The upload went up, and the only effect was the sound effects were muddied where the music was scrubbed out.
In November 2014 I re-watched the video and found that the music had been restored, a list of song attributions had been added below the description, and a banner ad appeared in the video (I'm not in the UA-cam partner program, so none of my uploads are monetized). I assume the copyright holder chose to let the music remain and just skim off whatever ad revenue the video might generate.
You are correct!! In fact, that is a great example of how YT used to help make the videos watchable instead of just taking down the videos and/or the channels completely. Thanks for watching and for sharing your experience. 👊😀
Crystal clear and useful video. THX!
Thank you so much GeekPa AND thank you for sharing your comments. Much appreciated. 👊😁
Great video 👍
Wish I had seen this prior to now, good stuff.
I‘m always using my camera, voice and guitar and still get copyright claims...
it's so disgusting.
Millennial Cleopatra i know
Hey Phillip! Really? What songs do you cover?
Cleo -- do you do covers, too?
Ian Corzine mostly Alternative Rock and German Rock, but also other genres.
I bought myself a new guitar and a better microphone because I wasn‘t satisfied with the quality of my videos. Would you recommend deleting all of my former content and start over New by recording everything again?
(45 subs / 75 h )
Hi, such a great video I learned so much. question, what if you appear in one of those videos and it’s not your video and they’re making revenue from your image? Would that be subject to copyright?
Is there anyway for someone who is doing a gaming channel like me to ensure theres no way their video gets said strike? I've gotten a few without me meaning for it as even with the music off some reason ambient music is what gets it.
So can I put something in the description that can avoid this trouble?
A famous creator from Mexico shared that a large news corp claimed his video for 3 seconds of content, taking a large amount of money from the man. Here's the thing... the content the news corp struck belongs to the creator! The news org had previously interviewed the creator, used footage from his video to make the news package, and then published that package on UA-cam. The algorithm scanned around and struck the creators content (because it was the same used by the news corp even though it belongs to the creator) The system went in favor of the large news corp. Eh, it's CNN! It appears as though, although you can manually accept and deny these infringements registered by the algorithm, 1) the algorithm is in favor of large corps. 2) the inter at CNN in charge of denying or accepting claims just clicks accept all the time, milking the creators' hard work.
Forgot to add... UA-cam's answer was more or less, " We can't get involved in legal matters between you and CNN."
OMG! What a story ... unfortunately, it's one I have heard all too often. Thanks for watching, Cleo! Have you have gotten a Manual Claim on your channel?
Really?? That's just BS
Ian Corzine Thank YOU for creating this pieces of gold. Fortunately, not yet. But it’s so limiting to be scared unclear rules.
I think every youtuber should watch all of Ian's video. I just love the content.
Thank you so much Chris for your kind words. I hope I am helping creators be successful. 👊😀
Thank you so much... underrated
Furkan Altun hey Leonardrose_pro on IG fixed up my suspended channel
Wowwww thank you so much !!! New subbie here 💕
Hey P!!! Awwwh, that’s so sweet! Thank you!!
Ian, thanks so much! While I don't make money from my fledgling videos, this video is highly constructive to me...
can i use a short muted 7 seconds clip of another youtuber's standard license video in my original video when I am talking over it educating about healthcare? Will i get a content ID claim? My work is all original but adding this will just help me explain stuff.
Question? I tried to put up a video and it says it was copyrighted. Can I waive my share rights for profit? I don’t have enough subscribers anyway I just want to show this interest video from a movie but I don’t want a strike either after I put it up. Great tutorial also.
Thanks for giving a very informative video! 😁
RJ Lotok hey Leonardrose_pro on IG fixed up my suspended channel
This was super helpful. Thank You
Sup OG!!! Thanks for the kind words.
Hi!
My problem is when i upload a video from a film which has a copyright, the youtube send me this message:
''Your video is bolcked in some countries due to copyrights and to avoid that try to download a song from youtube library''.
I wrote the name, date, publisher...but it did not work and i also used the songs of youtube and merged them with my video but the same probme is always existed.
Perhaps the problem is with film because i used to cut many videos of. And when the first one was warned by youtube, youtube warned all videos that i uploaded from this film even if i used all mentioned above?
Very informative vedio, o want really know about copy right rules.
I want to make a cooking show that builds on/is inspired by a famous cooking show on the food network. Do I need to avoid showing it in my show? Or should I take the risk and dispute any copyright claims under fair use?
Thank you for this video. What about if you aren’t intentionally including copyrighted music, but it is in the background of short clips where the focus is talking, cheering, laughing ? I’m working on a video from a trail race and running into that problem
Hi, this is a great question. I would love to help out and answer any questions you may have! I have a LIVE Q&A show this Saturday.
You can drop your questions and concerns on my LIVE show and TUNE IN.
Kindly check this link to get a notification.
facebook.com/yoursocialmedialawyer/posts/1231061260678010
The music swap is good but youtube should included the function of music volume control
I love this knowledge. Thank you
I learned something today thanks man
Wow!! Thank you so much. you are very welcome!! 👊😀
Thanks👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Thank you so much for watching!
Yeah, this doesn’t please me as a new content creator 😡 What UA-cam is calling a manual copyright claim is not manual at all! My very first video I uploaded got a claim on it within 5 min of uploading it. UA-cam said the copyright owner claimed a certain portion and it had the time stamps. Problem was, it was music I had a license for from one of the royalty free sites! And on top of that, the name of the song they said that I was using wasn’t even that song. Then I do some research and come to find out that there’s shady companies going to music download sites and laying copyright ownership to swaths of music (saying they work on behalf of the artist with the intent of laying claim to millions of poor unsuspecting souls on UA-cam! I would def check into this crooked scam going on, cause it’s alive and well
I had Sony/EMI claim something in my video the doesn't even exist. I have disputed the claim and am now waiting 6 days and no response. The claim states the them to Game of Thrones is in my video, which it is not. There is a remix from the Days of Thunder soundtrack that is a free use version. So this is an example of the abuse of the system. This has happened to me at least 100 times over the past 2 years. Mostly from scam companies that are trying to steal money from creators, but in this case it is a major corporation. I can send you a screen shot if you like.
Hey Just! Thanks for this thoughtful comment. Please do -- @iancorzine on Twitter
Amazing video its good to know these things
You've given my channel from great insights, thank you.
Hello, I just want to ask if giving credits to the rightful owner of any video content can help us avoid copyright claims?
Hey, thanks for this video. I know I am late to the party on the timing of the video and watching it. But I am in the process of starting a new channel and am very concerned about it and copyright law. I want to start a movie/series review channel using clips from movies, can I do this? Or should I come up with a different way to do the channel?
David Mendel hey Leonardrose_pro on IG fixed up my suspended channel
Awesome video
RAMIZ!!! You're the BEST!!!
another awesomely informative video that is straight to the point and without any gimmicks
Wow!! Thank you for your kind words. I really appreciate them. It is my goal to help creators be successful. Thanks for watching. 👊😀
The Godfather Of Cinema hey Leonardrose_pro on IG fixed up my suspended channel b
Always best law educator ✌🏼
😁❤😁
Hi Ian! I believe you've come across channels who do movie reviews like mystery recapped, scifi recapped, etc. Are they monetising from these videos? Don't they get copyright striked from the movie companies? Cause I wanna make a channel like theirs too. So I'm asking you first.
Any chance of making a video that addresses Fair Use rules for content creators that provide lessons on how to play songs on instruments? I've had some success disputing copyright claims, but it would be nice to avoid the headache of getting a claim in the first place. Is there a way to avoid them? I've been putting "fair use" as one of my video tags, but that's just spitting into the wind!
Hi! Been watching these videos for guidance but still can't find clarity on something. How much of a consecutive copyright material eg a movie clip is acceptable? Like is a 10-15 second clip Okay? Because I've seen some creators literally play 2 seconds of a song, or chipmunk voice it to avoid the issue. Any help would be appreciated thank you!
Hi Lebo!! What I normally tell creators is to use only 2-5 seconds of a video (10 sec max). It is hard to determine how other creators get away with longer videos. The chipmunk voice actually "modifies" the original video and keeps it short at the same time, so I can see why that passes YT's tests. I hope it is my videos that you have been watching for guidance. If not, I have several other videos that will teach you more about Fair Use and copyright and might answer any other questions you have. Good luck AND thanks for watching.👊😁
I intend to read out portions of books available in archive.org. Somebody was saying that upto four pages would not involve copyright/ fair use law violation. Is that true ?
I have been a photographer in the music business for 45 years. I now also produce music videos for my clients, with their music, and they are in the videos! I have to spend my precious time getting copyright notices and disputing them. Would it help if in the beginning of the video they say, "my name is Will Ackerman, and I have given permission for my own music to be in this video?" It is obvious they are in the video. The client can provide written permission, but if UA-cam is automated, it won't help. Thank you for your thoughts. CD Baby (Orchard) is issuing notices against the very people they are supposed to be protecting. THEY ARE IN THE VIDEO and IN THE CREDITS. Thank you, Ian. Do you have a video on this?
Hi Ian, some you tubers are putting video together from all different sources and make it a 10 mins video, ie, like car accidents or encounter with a ghost clips, is that legal?
I would bet that one of those videos is going to get them a strike for using copyrighted material. UA-cam is cracking down on everything that might even be seen as a violation. All they can do is try it and see what happens. Thanks for watching. 👊😀
Thanks for that Ian 😊
You are most welcome!! I just replied to your question above. 👊😁
Hi, I am just wondering, I am just checking if this is okay, if I can use,
Text to Speech (demo), [American English (en-US):MichaelV3 (male, enhanced dnn), (from IBM Watson Demo)
in a UA-cam video, that I am planning to make; if I am able to use it, what are the rules around it, as I am not going to put ads in the video.
As, when I am reading, terms of use, I could not fully understand what it means.
IBM Watson Demo - Terms of Use.
“You are authorized to use the Application and associated content for your own personal use for informational purposes only. The Application is not intended to be used for productive or commercial purposes, and such use is not permitted.”
I am not 100% sure, if I can use something that is "You are authorized to use the Application and associated content for your own personal use for informational purposes only", applies to making UA-cam videos.
Link to IBM Watson Demo - Terms of Use:
watson-developer-cloud.github.io/terms?name=Text-to-Speech%20Demo
Link to
text-to-speech-demo.ng.bluemix.net/#reset
Okay thanks.
From Brandon
Ahhh, that was refreshing clear and easy to understand. Thanks Ian!
WOW!!! Thank you so much for watching AND for giving your feedback. Much appreciated. 👊😁
You cannot get a copyright strike on content i
d upon upload, video can only get claim or block. A strike is only done manually when the video is public.
That is good to know Max & Sujy!! Creators ask me this all the time. Thank you. 👊😁
I want to file a Dispute for a song but its apart of the audio in a Thomas the tank engine video i did so is it fair use or not because i said i dont own it! so what do i do?
It worked for me because it was strickly my intro video so I clicked mute only the audio. So you can't hear my intro only.
Hey Keva! Thanks for watching 👊😀 But could you hear your voice audio?
@@iancorzine Here look...ua-cam.com/video/jLafgrgISJs/v-deo.html
just listen to the 1st 8 seconds... They muted literally my intro music and then my video plays... All my audio is there because the music wasn't throughout my video.
Good to know!!
Hi @Iam Keva and @Ian Corzine, I am new about how copyrights on you youtube works and about fair use which brought me here and view comments. I have a question related to @Iam Keva, in that case you are muted on the intro or any part in the video, will your content still used for monetization, if views grow? I'm uploading a new content but we dance a song played at the background 20 secs and it is is audible on the video. Hope you see this hank you so much!!!
Man, do you think popular video memes are copyright content or will i get in trouble if i use those memes in my videos? I only use small clips
If a large corporation knowingly makes a false copyright claim on YT, and does it repeatedly, are they not engaged in both criminal and civil fraud?
🤔
@ Corzine I am new to Tube so please answer this please.
IF those kids
get had credited Bon Jovi were they then OK via attribution ?
I also thought that brevity was considered fair use ? Like a 3 second clip which might represent less than
1/2 of 1% of an entire video ?
Last But Not Least does the copy write owner really need to do a manual search every few days on a video that is getting big views ? A few days of your material on someone elses channel could be tens of thousands of "Theft" views stolen from you. I Mean cant tube come up with software that prevents copy write material from being downloaded from their site ?
I am only uploading videos of old tube radios to demonstrate that they work and how they sound for my listings on eBay. I haven't received any strikes because I am not monetizing my videos. Are there any legal issues I should be worried about? Many other sellers use short videos to demonstrate products for sale. Thank You.
Social media lawyer? Enough said, I subscribed. Lol
Thank you. Please let me know if you ever have any questions. I am here to help creators be successful. 👊😀
This is quite informative and interesting, as I have just started a UA-cam channel. I wanted to take a bunch of Judge Judy clips, maybe 10-15, each literally 2 to 3 seconds and intersperse them with me and a friend in as litigants. Do you think that would be copyright striked? Thanks for your thoughts!!!
I tried the "mute the song" function before, but it muted my narration over it, so I just muted the whole thing and redubbed the lines in post.
Hopefully that did the trick for you. Sometimes it does take extra work but it's worth not getting a strike or a copyright claim. Thanks for watching and for sharing your experience. 👊😀
Google allowed me the option to allow them to remove copyrighted audio last year. I was filming a lady making Nitrogen ice cream in Utah and was totally oblivious to a song that was playing in the background.
Hey Terry! Oh, that’s great! BTW, Drop a link to the video. I don’t even know what nitrogen ice cream is. But I’m dying to find out!
@@iancorzine They use liquid nitrogen to freeze ice cream. It's really cool but we don't have it in Texas. Here is the video. ua-cam.com/video/QsYMLBi-vfo/v-deo.html
Love it!
Reaction video channels sometimes get copyright strikes and it's ridiculous. UA-cam won't monetize them, because they can't be, by law. The reactors even use Patreon and/or PayPal and will let those that donate submit requests pending the amount they donate. Some do take requests with no donation. So they can't be monetized, yet they still occasionally get copyright strikes, on reaction videos they're not even getting paid for, from UA-cam. It's not like they're selling recorded music, which would be a violation of copyright law.
Dope Videos
Does it count as fair use if I use nfl/ncaa/aaf/xfl clips in my football talk videos
mountjj hey Leonardrose_pro on IG fixed up my suspended channel b
Thank You Sir 👍🏼👏🏼✅. Not Cool Jovi, Not Cool 🤔
If I play by myself audio music and got a copyright claim from big company and it says play match. What should I do?
Hey Anna. I am sorry this happened.You should challenge the copyright claim.
Thank you!
I commented on another video of yours, I am young and need help, I can’t find where you can put links to music and stuff in the description, they say in the future any money from those videos gets put into the song writers bank account. Can you tell me where I could find or how to create these links already liked the video👍 need much help please notice
I am working on starting a UA-cam channel in the tech products niche and to promote those products in compilation videos with affiliate links in the descriptions below the compilations. I will be using manufacturers' promotional videos in the compilations as other channels do. That certainly means using copyrighted material that is often 30 seconds long or longer. In order to avoid copyright strikes and stay within UA-cam's reused content guidelines I will be changing (transforming) the promotional videos by editing, using my own voice overs, changing background music, adding text, adding channel logo and using transition effects. Should I be safe using manufacturers' promotional videos since they will be used to advertise those products? Do I really need to obtain permission from the manufacturers or the affiliate marketing programs that I sign up with?
I have a copy write question: So Disney Channel has a wand channel thingy and i wanted to use that design n instead of Disney in the mouse ears have my channel name. Is that possible without any copy write issues😢🥴
Im glad i found u lawyer 🤗
How do you do you tube shorts safely with out problems ? Plz would love your help thanks 🙏