See first you claim that there is God and I just wants my answer that how there is a God. If quaran claims then it had to show the evidence. When there was no matter , space and time then where was allah ? Prove the reality of allah .
I’ve got to be honest, this was pretty good. Just a couple of notes. 1 Richard Dawkins is not a strong atheist. 2 The majority of atheists are weak atheists, and they tend to find ‘strong atheism’ unsupportable. These atheists are often also agnostics. And indeed many theists are agnostic too. Agnosticism pertains to ‘knowledge’ and atheism pertains to ‘belief’, therefore not being an either/or.
Athiesm and agonistism are not one or the other, you can use more than one form to explain your belief or lack of more precisely. Example: if you belive in allah over other gods, you could say you are a thiest, but you could also say you are athiest to ALL other gods. They are not exclusive. This black and white thinking ignores all of gray in between.
@@Rationalpoint-t5o read this carefully. Every. Single. Person. Has. Bias. Toward. Something. Did that sink in? The biggest thing is to be aware of it and do your best to base your beliefs or lack there of in EVIDENCE based findings.
How do you debunk a position of saying I’m unconvinced of a claim?
Not this way.
Ma shaa Allah sir Allah bless you
See first you claim that there is God and I just wants my answer that how there is a God. If quaran claims then it had to show the evidence.
When there was no matter , space and time then where was allah ?
Prove the reality of allah .
I love hamza I have read this book very rational and important ❤
I’ve got to be honest, this was pretty good. Just a couple of notes.
1 Richard Dawkins is not a strong atheist.
2 The majority of atheists are weak atheists, and they tend to find ‘strong atheism’ unsupportable. These atheists are often also agnostics. And indeed many theists are agnostic too. Agnosticism pertains to ‘knowledge’ and atheism pertains to ‘belief’, therefore not being an either/or.
Athiesm and agonistism are not one or the other, you can use more than one form to explain your belief or lack of more precisely. Example: if you belive in allah over other gods, you could say you are a thiest, but you could also say you are athiest to ALL other gods. They are not exclusive. This black and white thinking ignores all of gray in between.
Sorry but that will be a totally hypocrisy and everyone will consider you as a biased person.
@@Rationalpoint-t5o everyone has bias. You definitely do. And no, you just don't understand how words work in language.
@@riopwnz but tell me how rational person is biased as per you
@@Rationalpoint-t5o read this carefully. Every. Single. Person. Has. Bias. Toward. Something.
Did that sink in? The biggest thing is to be aware of it and do your best to base your beliefs or lack there of in EVIDENCE based findings.
@@riopwnz yes you are right . But if it comes to religion then we have to see whether your thoughts are biased or not .
Ma Sha Allah sir
love you soo mush 🫀
❤❤❤