I live on an island between finland & sweden. I once stood on a beach near our western coast & a russian fighter blew over our heads flying really low.. The thing is NO ONE not even our own Finnsh army are allowed to be in our waters or skies without asking & receiving permission.. Russia constantly does this agression thing where one or two of their fighters flies into others airspace. And same with their submarines & ships.. They are annoyingly constantly everywhere.. like ants on a picnic..
That is because they are completely surrounded in the Baltic. They can't do anything without violating NATO Space anymore and since it is such a tiny area no matter where they go they would look like ants on a picnic. Now though that Island your on between Finland and Sweden is armed NATO space. It won't be you and other unarmed civilians on the beach, but armed NATO forces with ground to air missiles waiting for a field day instead of watching helpless as Russians enjoy their picnics.
What do you mean by unarmed civilians? You mean to say that in your countries, you only allow the authorities to be armed??? That sounds pretty silly. @@thedolphin1247
You forgot the part where the Russian generals get the order to drop the nuke and they look at each other and say oh shoot maybe we should not have sold the uranium for the bombs on the black market!
One day after the launch order is given and no nukes are in fact launched, several Russian generals find themselves having unfortunate window related accidents.
The good thing is, the U.S. has non nuclear options to respond to a nuclear attack. Unless full scale nuclear strike is launched, I truely hope U.S. leadership attemots a non nuclear retaliatory strike.
First thing they'll do is wipe out Putin wherever he is with conventional weaponry. They've already made it clear to Russia that they know where he is 24/7. Its suicide, literally, for him to launch any nukes against NATO.
Think we all would hope so. Although we have a history of "proportional retaliation". Iran for instance, we did so much more (operation praying mantis). We probably wouldn't nuke unless it's strategic weapons used by Russia. Russia knows this. It'll be tatical, thing is nukes might hurt... But their value is entirely shock now. It was shock in WW2 as well. The most castastrophic bombing in ww2 was not the nukes. Saturation bombing with fire. Tokyo was fire bombed. Much worse.
I personally didn't like this beggining of a story as in reality that wouldn't trigger war. Hypothetical Polish driver carrying military equipment for Ukrainian army inside Ukraine is a legitimate military target for Russia. Russia would have to strike inside Poland to trigger a war with NATO
@@Truspio Yeah, a handful of SU-24's getting all the way to western Ukraine? If they said a dozen SU-57's or 100 SU-34's struck just into Poland it would have sounded much better.
@TheInfographicsShow Hey! First of all, I love y’all’s videos, especially ones that cover history, politics, current events, and the war in Ukraine. They’re always very well put-together and very informative. I know these videos take a lot of time and are a lot of work. So I just wanna say thank you for all that y’all do!! Also, just so y’all are aware (in case you don’t already realize this), on this video as well as on several other videos that are compilations like this one is, they don’t always fully upload correctly, and there are sections that either have muffled/distorted audio, or no audio altogether. In case y’all didn’t realize this already, I just wanted to say something and try to be helpful!
So your saying that 20+ nations can defeat a single country? Wow! That’s helpful knowledge. Don’t forget Iran, China, and many other nations that are sick of being bullied by NATO.
these compilations are a good way to really learn a subject...since it's talked about in so many ways...you dont realize at one point you are basically narrating along side The Infographics Show Guy.
Russia has gone from the second most powerful Army in Ukraine. To the second most powerful Army in Russia. To the second most powerful Navy on the Black Sea. If Russia launched ICBMS they would likely land over Moscow knowing their maintenance habits. Slava Ukraini 💙💛
If Russia keeps making mistakes then all those suspicious bot/proRussia spam accounts on UA-cam won't be able to post anymore since they'll have an infrastructure like the 1400's again.
The one thing the Soviets never learned... even to this day... logistics. And this is what killed both them and Germany in WWII. What the Allies demonstrated on D-Day... logiistics baby, logistics.
User would be a bug a mistake 😢😢😢 usa will and can destroy there whole attempt ... would be a sad day as many innocent Russian ppl would die ....if they do meet laser defence
U.S Sending 30 Billion Dollars to the Ukraine, yet we can't take care of our own problems internally? America need to be helping the homeless and the hungry instead of wasting all the taxpayers money on war games.
Well that really is impossible because of that will make inflation higher than its now is but the money to Ukraine will not do anything but make inflation lower than it’s now that’s why
„wasting money on war games“ Ofc war is wasteful, but it’s not like we have a choice to participate or not though, do we? If someone threatens you or someone you know, all you can think of is how much money you wasted on protection?? There are sons, fathers and daughters giving there life for our western world. The least we can do is support them financially.
I'm skeptical of the SU25's being able to strife a convoy of UN trucks with no warning. As of today, Ukraine has the radars fo the Patriot systems, there are AWACs flying around, and I could be mistaken. Still, I believe Aegis Ashore in Poland has been completed and operational.
It's highly unlikely SU-25's could get that far into western Ukraine at all. They would have to risk the SU-57's or a lot of their SU-34's- for something like that which is highly unlikely as Russia is unwilling to risk their air force like that.
Neither Biden or Trump should be the next president. Time for a younger president with different ideas and charisma. JFK was not the greatest president but he had ideas and inspired the USA to aim for the moon.
I thought the same and the US President holding the mobile phone made me smile. I imagined Biden shouting ‘where’s my real phone this one hasn’t got a curly wire coming from the handset ‘ lol 😃.
It's commonly assumed that launching nukes is the end of the world. In reality, the US has vowed to not use nukes in countervalue (civilian) attacks. Major Attack Option 1 of the SIOP calls for counterforce strikes to eliminate the nuclear forces (and most of the armed forces) of Russia.
I think that with the current population growth trends and the effects of them we see in the world, the use of nuclear weapons will be focused on major population centers to simply obliterate the enemy's capability of sustaining a long war. Conventional forces can destroy conventional forces, but cannot destroy cities. So it would be pretty genocidal. Which suits me, I have zero aspirations living in a post-nuclear war Earth.
After seeing video of Israel's "iron dome" in action, I have a feeling USA has something similar for anti-icbm defense. There is a chance that enemy nukes might not even make it to us soil!
Can there be another challenge video? The last one was released over a year and three months ago!!! You have mainly been releasing videos on Russia and Putin.
If this should ever become reality Russia can now release there full military. The war in Ukraine is limited, because it's not technically a war; it's a special military operation.
@@ButFirstHeLitItOnFire on the edges of the ship there are high pressure water beams to prevent ships from boarding and getting to close, typically used to prevent modern piracy.
@@Redoctober81 that’s not what he’s talking about lol they have a system that washes the Ship down to limit the amount of radiation the ship captures and holds.
As described in the video, people come last as far as Russia is concerned. That explains the cannon fodder methods and other stuff such as cardboard stuffing in body armour. The oldies used to say, this during the Soviet era, that the Kremlin, the autocrats, don't care how many people they waste, even their own, as long as they retain the reins of government. In 1992 I was in Ukraine, and in places over there, I was not happy with toilet facilities. I was told that toilet paper was considered a luxury over there. In Australia, people have ready access to half a dozen different types of toilet paper rolls,rhick ones, thin ones, soft ones, hard ones, crinkled ones. Better care for people than in former iron curtain countries. One wondered where a country's taxes or wealth were used?
Uhm... This video was posted 5 months ago, but the content around 30 minutes in the video is years old! Germany's ties with Russia? The US F-35 fleet not ready? That's not the case anymore and wasn't for multiple years now!
The United States has 17 Ticonderoga class cruisers. They have 11 active carriers. Some have 1 cruiser protecting, some have 2. Some are being refitted, some are in maintenance. Doesn't make for a lot of cruisers to go around.
there's also between 3 and 5 arleighburke flight 3's with each battle group as well which carry sm6's as well they all would have been launching and using sensor information from all ships radar's making it easier to pick out the warhead from decoy's @@RogerW9421
@@RogerW9421 The trick is that the Ticos can feed that data to other ships, things like Arleigh Burke Destroyers, which are ALSO part of the Aegis defense network. And, as of writing this, we have *seventy-two* active. There is more than one ship engaging the nuke falling on that carrier.
Never NEVER underestimate your enemies. While we should be realistic in evaluating never let your want of outcomes to out weigh REALITY of what is AND the UNKNOWNS! SLAVA UKRAINE! AEC USN RET ⚓
NATO would not invoke article 5 over a lost convoy. Most NATO countries do not want want war with Russia as their countries would be devastated. The whole point of NATO is act as a deterrent to war, not to drag countries into war.
Even if NATO invokes article 5 or states that if Russia destroys nato convoys as an attack on NATO, makes no sense since it essentially gives Russia a right to attack it given any weapon used against Russia can be destroyed for self defense
You might want to get your information from independent sources...in two months of their counteroffensive, Ukraine has retaken 100 sq km of territory, Russia is still holding onto over 100,000 sq km. This has come at a cost of 42,000 Ukrainian soldiers and nearly 40% of all the armor we have provided to them for this strike. Ukraine is not getting the territory back, in fact, over the next six months, I would expect them to lose even more of their territory leaving Russia in control of well over 1/3 of the country.
I have to say. Even though it's a short cartoon, it still puts a lump in my throat. Years ago, i was a certified key holder for the specials hold on an ammo ship. Basically, it required 2 of us to open that hold to gain access to the specials. Either for transport to another ship or if during a security alert to be the last line of defense to keep that hold secure. So yes, it puts a lump in my throat.
At this point, based on what they’ve seen so far, NATO and US leaders aren’t even sure that Russia’s nuclear weapons have been maintained enough to work as designed if Putin were to try to use them. Also, some officials doubt that the Russian dead hand system has been maintained enough to work and that it was offline long ago with the collapse of the Soviet Union.
@@mattg4705 didn’t say anywhere that I agreed with them. But ICBMs and missiles in general require a lot of constant, highly specialized and highly expensive TLC in order to work correctly when you push the launch button. Recently, their big bad Satan II ICBM that was supposed to be state of the art couldn’t even get off of the launch pad without destroying itself. And their tanks have been documented to have egg crates where there should’ve been state of the art reactive armor. So, I can see why people that know a lot more than you or I might think this way.
So that means we should fight Russia head on? This isnt call of Duty. Russia has more advanced nuclear weapons than China.. Everything you're talking about is land based homie, you probably forgot about Nuclear armed submarines.
Посмотрел несколько минут с автопереводом, почитал перевод комментариев. Трёхчасовое видео уровня Тома Кленси, для школьников. Коменнтарии соответствующие. Я очень надеюсь, что основная масса людей на западе не тупо смотрят телевизор, а хоть немного пытаются своим мозгом думать "что, зачем и почему". Впрочем, как и у нас.
Given the corruption and stealing of radios and lack of money even to maintain tanks and tyres ect, i cant believe these complex ICBM's that cost so much to keep ready, could be serviceable especially the rigours of flight and stresses. Assuming Russia hasnt been putting all its money into its nuke, maybe 50% might work as intended?
I remember that channel used to have more diversity of subject matter. Now everything is all about Ukraine and Russia. You guys know there are more subject matters out here than just that right?
I agree there is other subject matters they could make content about. But right now with nuclear war being threatened, even if just a bluff, predictions on how things would play out is what's taking over a lot of the Internet. Unfortunately a world war isn't as far away as it used to be.
You give to much attention to this 3.rd world country ,,russia,,!!! they are no military power to compete with NATO !!!!! They are struggling with Ukraine....that says it all about russian military power😅😅😅😅😅, NATO would need only few weeks to drink Cafe at Kremlin.
@@nigeh5326 it sort spot lights how the skys are watched. Deductive reasoning based on known things and how stuff operates. For example the Ukraine 🇺🇦 war . The u.s. selling them weopons ..translates to the skys are being watched closer then most would assume. Feel free to tell me inam wrong and explain it.
@@meltedcopper9247 I’m not a believer in ufos being from other planets. Yes people see things they can’t recognise all the time but it doesn’t mean they are seeing Marvin the Martian out for a flight in his saucer. The immense distances involved, faster than light speeds being necessary to cover them etc to me make it highly improbable we have been or are being visited. Going by some believers stories these super beings fly across space to Earth then crash their highly advanced craft into the ground. Or they come to kidnap and sexually abuse people and cut up animals leaving remains behind which if they don’t want to be detected seems poor. The video and photos we’ve seen can be explained or are terrible quality. Given most humans have mobile phones, plus we have surveillance cameras everywhere and radar covering the sky yet no certain proof of aliens. I do think life probably exists elsewhere but I doubt they travel here if for no other reason than if you were an alien and could go anywhere would you really visit Roswell or Rendlesham Forest? 😊
I loved the book taster and it reminded me of a children’s book called ‘The Giving Tree’ Also I was reminded of the fear that the LHC could create tiny black holes that would accumulate at the earths core and settle there and basically would grow and grow until they eventually start eating the earth from the inside out. By the time we notice the first rumblings we would only have a few minutes left until we are consumed. Such a happy thought 😅
Impossible. If you’re saying that a black hole could happen somewhere here on or in the earth. There couldn’t be an edge on any black hole. Their gravitational pull is too strong. Let’s say one develops, the planet would be completely gone within a nanosecond. There could be no earth around the black hole to even make a black hole. I hope I make sense 😂 it’s hard to explain.
A black hole small enough to move unnoticed into the earth would evaporate before you findished reading the first letter in this sentence. The LHC doesn't reach anywhere near that energy, but even if it did they'd never make it out of the loop before exploding in little flashes too faint to see.
i cant walk in my american city at night - for fear of being mugged - but for over a year weve been told " russia is losing - trust me - they are fine - do you plan to tell us for the next ten years how russia is " losing ?
Germany's dependence on Russian energy sources: On the one hand, people have relied on Russian energy sources for too long out of sheer convenience. On the other hand, alternatives are now being implemented. Moreover, the winters in Germany are no longer as cold as they used to be, which can be measured by how rarely it still snows. Seen in this light, one can no longer derive a threat potential from this, as one could have done 30 years ago.
@@zoanth4Well Iam living here and can guarantee you: We are no longer relied on anything Russian. 😅 That topic is pretty important over here and had main priority since the war's start
U.S response to nuclear threat is counter nuclear attack + any country chance to get rid of nuke is like 10% and if one is sent there is like 20 on air after that. this is just super hopeful scenario.
I think they are vastly underestimating the response time of NATO and their defenses! Also the second a Nuclear launch is detected, like you said yourself. They won’t know the destination fast enough, so they have to launch their own nuclear weapons!
Dude you do realize that you F-22 in this video is an AV8 Harrier right? You got the SU 57 right but the plane you are calling the F-22 is not snapped anything like an F-22. It’s shaped like a Harrier jump jet or an F-8 Crusader which is an old outdated and no longer flown aircraft. I think the Harrier is still being flown but the last thing it or the F-8 is is stealth.
I feel like Infographics have made this exact same video over and over again, like 15 times by now
@@jmilber Fr like
That's because infographics is a SCP.
I live on an island between finland & sweden. I once stood on a beach near our western coast & a russian fighter blew over our heads flying really low..
The thing is NO ONE not even our own Finnsh army are allowed to be in our waters or skies without asking & receiving permission..
Russia constantly does this agression thing where one or two of their fighters flies into others airspace. And same with their submarines & ships..
They are annoyingly constantly everywhere.. like ants on a picnic..
That is because they are completely surrounded in the Baltic. They can't do anything without violating NATO Space anymore and since it is such a tiny area no matter where they go they would look like ants on a picnic. Now though that Island your on between Finland and Sweden is armed NATO space. It won't be you and other unarmed civilians on the beach, but armed NATO forces with ground to air missiles waiting for a field day instead of watching helpless as Russians enjoy their picnics.
What do you mean by unarmed civilians? You mean to say that in your countries, you only allow the authorities to be armed??? That sounds pretty silly. @@thedolphin1247
@@reagafranroswhat country are you speaking of?? Not the U.S.A. I can PROMISE YOU we are heavily heavily armed! To the teeth🤠🤠😈😈😊
Finland😂😂
You got THAT right.I'm from Texas. Yes, we're all strapped!!!😊
You forgot the part where the Russian generals get the order to drop the nuke and they look at each other and say oh shoot maybe we should not have sold the uranium for the bombs on the black market!
😂 or if the nukes haven't been serviced in decades
not so much about the uranium but the super expensive tritium inside nukes need to be replace every 12-15 years.
One day after the launch order is given and no nukes are in fact launched, several Russian generals find themselves having unfortunate window related accidents.
@@zephyr8072Purina Putin has that accident immediately after giving the order.
When U Nuke others - you’re Nuking YOURSELF
When U are killing Others - you are actually killing your family.
The good thing is, the U.S. has non nuclear options to respond to a nuclear attack. Unless full scale nuclear strike is launched, I truely hope U.S. leadership attemots a non nuclear retaliatory strike.
Yes, And, in fact, the US has made clear that Russia would be smashed by conventional means in the event of the use of a tactical nuke.
First thing they'll do is wipe out Putin wherever he is with conventional weaponry. They've already made it clear to Russia that they know where he is 24/7. Its suicide, literally, for him to launch any nukes against NATO.
there will be an end war with 99% death
Think we all would hope so. Although we have a history of "proportional retaliation". Iran for instance, we did so much more (operation praying mantis). We probably wouldn't nuke unless it's strategic weapons used by Russia. Russia knows this. It'll be tatical, thing is nukes might hurt... But their value is entirely shock now. It was shock in WW2 as well. The most castastrophic bombing in ww2 was not the nukes. Saturation bombing with fire. Tokyo was fire bombed. Much worse.
I like your thinking. This is exactly how I think things should turn in that case.
As soon as you said "The trucks were manned by Polish..." that was it. That was when Russia fell.
I personally didn't like this beggining of a story as in reality that wouldn't trigger war. Hypothetical Polish driver carrying military equipment for Ukrainian army inside Ukraine is a legitimate military target for Russia. Russia would have to strike inside Poland to trigger a war with NATO
@@Truspio Nope. That is not how that works.
@@Truspio Yeah, a handful of SU-24's getting all the way to western Ukraine? If they said a dozen SU-57's or 100 SU-34's struck just into Poland it would have sounded much better.
Texan here..we got you
I just pray when the draft happens I don’t get stationed with the frenchies😂💯
@TheInfographicsShow Hey! First of all, I love y’all’s videos, especially ones that cover history, politics, current events, and the war in Ukraine. They’re always very well put-together and very informative. I know these videos take a lot of time and are a lot of work. So I just wanna say thank you for all that y’all do!!
Also, just so y’all are aware (in case you don’t already realize this), on this video as well as on several other videos that are compilations like this one is, they don’t always fully upload correctly, and there are sections that either have muffled/distorted audio, or no audio altogether. In case y’all didn’t realize this already, I just wanted to say something and try to be helpful!
This is a good way to learn. This is why I subscribed to y’all’s UA-cam channel. Thanks
Sad how prevalent this topic is on all of our minds again
yes but the more you know the more you can do to prepare.
Your minds* glad never on mine ^^
So your saying that 20+ nations can defeat a single country? Wow! That’s helpful knowledge. Don’t forget Iran, China, and many other nations that are sick of being bullied by NATO.
I had never heard about the US invasion of Russia, very interesting!
This 3 hour compilation should be made into a movie?
😊 How many times in one movie can Russia lose a war? 😁
It is an amazing piece of fiction.
these compilations are a good way to really learn a subject...since it's talked about in so many ways...you dont realize at one point you are basically narrating along side The Infographics Show Guy.
We are back
Russia has gone from the second most powerful Army in Ukraine. To the second most powerful Army in Russia. To the second most powerful Navy on the Black Sea. If Russia launched ICBMS they would likely land over Moscow knowing their maintenance habits. Slava Ukraini 💙💛
NPC
If Russia keeps making mistakes then all those suspicious bot/proRussia spam accounts on UA-cam won't be able to post anymore since they'll have an infrastructure like the 1400's again.
cringe
@@AdissapointedSonic me? bro thinks everything is black and white
@@2010hyundaielantra nooo man the op im on about haha
The one thing the Soviets never learned... even to this day... logistics. And this is what killed both them and Germany in WWII. What the Allies demonstrated on D-Day... logiistics baby, logistics.
User would be a bug a mistake 😢😢😢 usa will and can destroy there whole attempt ... would be a sad day as many innocent Russian ppl would die ....if they do meet laser defence
“amateurs talk strategy professionals talk logistics
I love these videos so in detail ❤
Bro All it is is fear mongering
U.S Sending 30 Billion Dollars to the Ukraine, yet we can't take care of our own problems internally? America need to be helping the homeless and the hungry instead of wasting all the taxpayers money on war games.
😂 do homeless people have oil
Well that really is impossible because of that will make inflation higher than its now is but the money to Ukraine will not do anything but make inflation lower than it’s now that’s why
you loose already
„wasting money on war games“
Ofc war is wasteful, but it’s not like we have a choice to participate or not though, do we?
If someone threatens you or someone you know, all you can think of is how much money you wasted on protection??
There are sons, fathers and daughters giving there life for our western world. The least we can do is support them financially.
*The US president makes a call:* _"Hubbardoo RUPuuPRFOOTHolD! JACk!"_
US Navy, Vietnam War, Cold War. Faced Soviet weapons drawn upon us at close range. Been there, done that.
My step father was 1st Cavalry, and was there during Tet. Thank you.
@@Monsoon_EnjoyerAK last forever
Look up Tet Offensive and see if you still feel the same way@@Monsoon_Enjoyer
I seen multiple migs fly over the destroyer I served on. Then American jets were hot in persuit.
I'm skeptical of the SU25's being able to strife a convoy of UN trucks with no warning. As of today, Ukraine has the radars fo the Patriot systems, there are AWACs flying around, and I could be mistaken. Still, I believe Aegis Ashore in Poland has been completed and operational.
It's been doing it for some time now
It's highly unlikely SU-25's could get that far into western Ukraine at all. They would have to risk the SU-57's or a lot of their SU-34's- for something like that which is highly unlikely as Russia is unwilling to risk their air force like that.
Notice you haven't heard anything of the flawed Patriot since they arrived
@@JuniousC.Thomasthat’s because the only thing “flawed” is your thinking (or lack thereof)… 😂
@@JuniousC.Thomasyou and your 2 day old vatnik account… 😂
Thank God we have a young, smart, intelligent leader in Biden to guide us through such a situation
If you had trumpet, he'd tick all those boxes .. oh wait.
@@simonwatson2399 I was trying REALLY hard to be sarcastic, I guess it still didnt come through lol
Neither Biden or Trump should be the next president.
Time for a younger president with different ideas and charisma.
JFK was not the greatest president but he had ideas and inspired the USA to aim for the moon.
@@nigeh5326 Big agree
@@nigeh5326plus JFK was the type of guy to not get involved in conflicts that our CIA forced Kennedy to do such as Cuba
why is it the other people are saying Ukraine is wiped out and Russia is winning...
The cartoon version of Boris Johnson of England is great.
😂
I thought the same and the US President holding the mobile phone made me smile.
I imagined Biden shouting ‘where’s my real phone this one hasn’t got a curly wire coming from the handset ‘ lol 😃.
@nigeh5326 "this phone is broken, where's the rotary dial"
@@dr_tate lol 😆👍
Logistics: "A military can't fight without fuel, food, and ammo..."
Russia: watch me hopeless continue to try!
PRAISE BE TO THE HEAVENLY FATHER
dont underestimate your enemy!!
It's commonly assumed that launching nukes is the end of the world. In reality, the US has vowed to not use nukes in countervalue (civilian) attacks. Major Attack Option 1 of the SIOP calls for counterforce strikes to eliminate the nuclear forces (and most of the armed forces) of Russia.
I think that with the current population growth trends and the effects of them we see in the world, the use of nuclear weapons will be focused on major population centers to simply obliterate the enemy's capability of sustaining a long war. Conventional forces can destroy conventional forces, but cannot destroy cities. So it would be pretty genocidal. Which suits me, I have zero aspirations living in a post-nuclear war Earth.
@@uncle0quenchyHiroshima and Nagasaki have entered the chat.........
@@boostjunkie2320those were fire crackers compared to modern nuclear weapons.
Well, that would make me feel better if I were Russian.
After seeing video of Israel's "iron dome" in action, I have a feeling USA has something similar for anti-icbm defense. There is a chance that enemy nukes might not even make it to us soil!
Can there be another challenge video? The last one was released over a year and three months ago!!! You have mainly been releasing videos on Russia and Putin.
Like North Korea? 😊
If this should ever become reality Russia can now release there full military. The war in Ukraine is limited, because it's not technically a war; it's a special military operation.
Yes and the war in Iraq was actually Operation Enduring Freedom
Surprised this video completely forgot about the countermeasure washdown system that the carriers would have turned on
Explain?
Shhhh, it’s a seeeeecret
@@ButFirstHeLitItOnFire on the edges of the ship there are high pressure water beams to prevent ships from boarding and getting to close, typically used to prevent modern piracy.
@@Redoctober81 that’s not what he’s talking about lol they have a system that washes the Ship down to limit the amount of radiation the ship captures and holds.
@@WocketInMyPocket_ thanks for clarifying.👍
As described in the video, people come last as far as Russia is concerned. That explains the cannon fodder methods and other stuff such as cardboard stuffing in body armour. The oldies used to say, this during the Soviet era, that the Kremlin, the autocrats, don't care how many people they waste, even their own, as long as they retain the reins of government. In 1992 I was in Ukraine, and in places over there, I was not happy with toilet facilities. I was told that toilet paper was considered a luxury over there. In Australia, people have ready access to half a dozen different types of toilet paper rolls,rhick ones, thin ones, soft ones, hard ones, crinkled ones. Better care for people than in former iron curtain countries. One wondered where a country's taxes or wealth were used?
Uhm... This video was posted 5 months ago, but the content around 30 minutes in the video is years old! Germany's ties with Russia? The US F-35 fleet not ready? That's not the case anymore and wasn't for multiple years now!
You've got far more than one cruiser defending a carrier group.
I think it’s like 8-12 ships and a couple subs actually so yeah a lot more than one 🤣
The United States has 17 Ticonderoga class cruisers. They have 11 active carriers. Some have 1 cruiser protecting, some have 2. Some are being refitted, some are in maintenance. Doesn't make for a lot of cruisers to go around.
there's also between 3 and 5 arleighburke flight 3's with each battle group as well which carry sm6's as well they all would have been launching and using sensor information from all ships radar's making it easier to pick out the warhead from decoy's @@RogerW9421
@@RogerW9421 The trick is that the Ticos can feed that data to other ships, things like Arleigh Burke Destroyers, which are ALSO part of the Aegis defense network. And, as of writing this, we have *seventy-two* active. There is more than one ship engaging the nuke falling on that carrier.
Never NEVER underestimate your enemies. While we should be realistic in evaluating never let your want of outcomes to out weigh REALITY of what is AND the UNKNOWNS! SLAVA UKRAINE! AEC USN RET ⚓
3,5 hour video??? On the same topic again??! Its like every week youre releasing the same video
Thanks for sharing
Such frightening times we live in...
Is what someone severely indoctrinated would say
We’ve lived in incredibly dangerous times since the end of WW2 and the creation of nukes
@@nigeh5326 This is the first time in history you have a world leader threatening to obliterate all life on this planet almost on a daily basis.
Don't worry Biden has his ice cream in one hand and his other hand is on the button😂😂
beautiful PR.
I started to watch and then realised it's three and half hours long. Going to be long night 😂😂
it’s fun to watch though
indoctrination at its finest here
Love the info graphics this guys voice sounds very cool
Russia will loose ..weak leader .weak army . Strong people
I love you work I feel educated and i watch you wen I'm sad
Today's Poland is nothing compared to WW2 Poland. Poland alone could take it up with Russia.
What has Russia got? Your guess is as good as of Mr. Bean. Time will tell. I do love watching this comedy though!
NATO would not invoke article 5 over a lost convoy. Most NATO countries do not want want war with Russia as their countries would be devastated. The whole point of NATO is act as a deterrent to war, not to drag countries into war.
Even if NATO invokes article 5 or states that if Russia destroys nato convoys as an attack on NATO, makes no sense since it essentially gives Russia a right to attack it given any weapon used against Russia can be destroyed for self defense
This was epic, I've just had it on the entire day at work
Haven't you done this topic like twenty times this year????
Ah yes something relaxing to watch before bed..............oh, thanks youtube 😯
Love you beautiful work ( would love to say that i am glad that Ukraine is finally getting putin back for destroying the country
You might want to get your information from independent sources...in two months of their counteroffensive, Ukraine has retaken 100 sq km of territory, Russia is still holding onto over 100,000 sq km. This has come at a cost of 42,000 Ukrainian soldiers and nearly 40% of all the armor we have provided to them for this strike. Ukraine is not getting the territory back, in fact, over the next six months, I would expect them to lose even more of their territory leaving Russia in control of well over 1/3 of the country.
I have to say. Even though it's a short cartoon, it still puts a lump in my throat. Years ago, i was a certified key holder for the specials hold on an ammo ship. Basically, it required 2 of us to open that hold to gain access to the specials. Either for transport to another ship or if during a security alert to be the last line of defense to keep that hold secure. So yes, it puts a lump in my throat.
At this point, based on what they’ve seen so far, NATO and US leaders aren’t even sure that Russia’s nuclear weapons have been maintained enough to work as designed if Putin were to try to use them. Also, some officials doubt that the Russian dead hand system has been maintained enough to work and that it was offline long ago with the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Those are the absolute most batshit dangerous assumptions to make if you are right great if you are wrong the world ends
@@mattg4705 didn’t say anywhere that I agreed with them. But ICBMs and missiles in general require a lot of constant, highly specialized and highly expensive TLC in order to work correctly when you push the launch button. Recently, their big bad Satan II ICBM that was supposed to be state of the art couldn’t even get off of the launch pad without destroying itself. And their tanks have been documented to have egg crates where there should’ve been state of the art reactive armor. So, I can see why people that know a lot more than you or I might think this way.
@@mattg4705but on the plus side Russia gets to be destroyed
So that means we should fight Russia head on? This isnt call of Duty. Russia has more advanced nuclear weapons than China.. Everything you're talking about is land based homie, you probably forgot about Nuclear armed submarines.
@@dfdemtkeep thinking that😂😂
I'd really like to see a INFOGRAPHIC TIMELINE VIDEO on the AI APOCALYPSE. Starting with the launch of a self-upgrading multi-platform AI. 😮
Do you mean starting with YOU TYPING THAT COMMENT? WHAT HAVE YOU DONE
😶🌫@@reagafranros
Посмотрел несколько минут с автопереводом, почитал перевод комментариев. Трёхчасовое видео уровня Тома Кленси, для школьников. Коменнтарии соответствующие.
Я очень надеюсь, что основная масса людей на западе не тупо смотрят телевизор, а хоть немного пытаются своим мозгом думать "что, зачем и почему". Впрочем, как и у нас.
While watching this video I fell off my chair laughing.😊😅😂
Given the corruption and stealing of radios and lack of money even to maintain tanks and tyres ect, i cant believe these complex ICBM's that cost so much to keep ready, could be serviceable especially the rigours of flight and stresses. Assuming Russia hasnt been putting all its money into its nuke, maybe 50% might work as intended?
@ 11:28, typo with 'interceptors'... just sayin'..
This is disinformation, comrade
I think the problem is that the ICBM are not that complex.
Russians have plenty of experience with rocketry.
You really need to watch less infographics.
@@WilderweincdPast tense. Had!
Sometimes we have to loose... Failure to understand that will make us all loose
I absolutely love how this is 3+ hours of Infographics dunking and making fun of Russia 😂
Funny how France now is stepping back they seem to go with the flow in out , ...in out ..
France surrendered already😂😂😂
I remember that channel used to have more diversity of subject matter. Now everything is all about Ukraine and Russia. You guys know there are more subject matters out here than just that right?
It’s a popular subject
Tell me about it, it's easy clicks tho.
I agree there is other subject matters they could make content about. But right now with nuclear war being threatened, even if just a bluff, predictions on how things would play out is what's taking over a lot of the Internet. Unfortunately a world war isn't as far away as it used to be.
@@lifewithkirsten7670
Gee its almost like the channel owners and content creators make whatever videos they want without needing your approval.
How weird.
As an American I can say our politics are divided but I promise you we have the biggest stick and I rocks fly further
They already have directed energy weapons in conventional war, not too far of a stretch to think we already have directed energy protection from nukes
They already tested them on Maui.
😂😂 only in the movies
Russia is once again causing sleepless nights to somebody 😂😂😂😂😂😂.
Only video editors.
PRAISE BE TO GOD AMEN
Can't stop a nuke.
Zzst zzst 😂😂 it would be like fish in a barrel
Speed of light vs a slug
great essay!
Godzilla holding his arm looks like he’s a menace
❤️🇺🇦🇺🇸❤️
hey just so you know the Audio cuts out from 1:47:12 to 1:49:15 still an absolutely amazing video otherwise
No wonder the Russian youth wants to flee at any cost. I would too.
I don't like these hypothetical videos... I want to learn about real events!
You give to much attention to this 3.rd world country ,,russia,,!!! they are no military power to compete with NATO !!!!! They are struggling with Ukraine....that says it all about russian military power😅😅😅😅😅, NATO would need only few weeks to drink Cafe at Kremlin.
So why not, Russia is so vulnerable?
remember when russia was on the verge of collapse ?
Boris is gone. Just FYI.
You guys went all out on this video
If a fighter's range is classified, it's a pretty safe bet it is impressive.
Or it’s range is embarrassingly bad 😅lol
@@nigeh5326 true.
1st love the videos
It’ll probably land in russia
The reaction to a nuclear war and how it would play out makes me less a believer in ufos..
Why?
@@nigeh5326 it sort spot lights how the skys are watched. Deductive reasoning based on known things and how stuff operates. For example the Ukraine 🇺🇦 war . The u.s. selling them weopons ..translates to the skys are being watched closer then most would assume. Feel free to tell me inam wrong and explain it.
@@meltedcopper9247 I’m not a believer in ufos being from other planets. Yes people see things they can’t recognise all the time but it doesn’t mean they are seeing Marvin the Martian out for a flight in his saucer.
The immense distances involved, faster than light speeds being necessary to cover them etc to me make it highly improbable we have been or are being visited.
Going by some believers stories these super beings fly across space to Earth then crash their highly advanced craft into the ground. Or they come to kidnap and sexually abuse people and cut up animals leaving remains behind which if they don’t want to be detected seems poor.
The video and photos we’ve seen can be explained or are terrible quality.
Given most humans have mobile phones, plus we have surveillance cameras everywhere and radar covering the sky yet no certain proof of aliens.
I do think life probably exists elsewhere but I doubt they travel here if for no other reason than if you were an alien and could go anywhere would you really visit Roswell or Rendlesham Forest? 😊
I loved the book taster and it reminded me of a children’s book called ‘The Giving Tree’ Also I was reminded of the fear that the LHC could create tiny black holes that would accumulate at the earths core and settle there and basically would grow and grow until they eventually start eating the earth from the inside out. By the time we notice the first rumblings we would only have a few minutes left until we are consumed. Such a happy thought 😅
And an hour later I’m back to comment on this to say thanks for the rabbit hole I just went down. Wasn’t horrible but wasn’t awesome either.
LHCs can't create black holes. It's a theorized phenomenon like the idea of their being a particle that causes gravity (graviton). So no need to worry
Impossible. If you’re saying that a black hole could happen somewhere here on or in the earth. There couldn’t be an edge on any black hole. Their gravitational pull is too strong. Let’s say one develops, the planet would be completely gone within a nanosecond. There could be no earth around the black hole to even make a black hole. I hope I make sense 😂 it’s hard to explain.
A black hole small enough to move unnoticed into the earth would evaporate before you findished reading the first letter in this sentence. The LHC doesn't reach anywhere near that energy, but even if it did they'd never make it out of the loop before exploding in little flashes too faint to see.
35 minutes into this thing, 11 adverts.
Switched it off and telling you tube not to recommend channel again
Sorry, truth hurts
7 months later…..Ukraine is lossing
Great video. But I can't understand why you use the image of an old Harrier plane to show the F22 Raptor? It looks nothing like it.
putin: fire nukes!!! His generals: No Him :(
@@TheCipherUK well yeah I believe they wouldn’t attempt to cause nuclear war
@@PulseBeats1It's happened before (look up Stanislav Petrov), but it just takes one person to push the button and everything goes up in flames.
@@bensutton3527They fixed the human factor with Perimeter aka Dead Hand.
Got enough commercialz?!I quit watching afta 20min n 8 commercialz,jeesh tha greed is real!!!
sorry but the aim120d3 has a longer range than the r77m
Yep, the 105km range of AIM120d3 is way bigger than the 197km range of R-77M. I just wonder how you even passed 1st grade?
In a war against NATO, F-22's would annihilate Russia's air force.
what about Russian s400s? and s500?
i cant walk in my american city at night - for fear of being mugged - but for over a year weve been told " russia is losing - trust me - they are fine - do you plan to tell us for the next ten years how russia is " losing ?
3 hours holy cow
Germany's dependence on Russian energy sources: On the one hand, people have relied on Russian energy sources for too long out of sheer convenience. On the other hand, alternatives are now being implemented. Moreover, the winters in Germany are no longer as cold as they used to be, which can be measured by how rarely it still snows. Seen in this light, one can no longer derive a threat potential from this, as one could have done 30 years ago.
Next year Germany could have a cold snap and fall into anarchy.
@@zoanth4Well Iam living here and can guarantee you: We are no longer relied on anything Russian. 😅 That topic is pretty important over here and had main priority since the war's start
@@BertMD where do you get your oil and gas from.
U.S response to nuclear threat is counter nuclear attack + any country chance to get rid of nuke is like 10% and if one is sent there is like 20 on air after that. this is just super hopeful scenario.
I think they are vastly underestimating the response time of NATO and their defenses!
Also the second a Nuclear launch is detected, like you said yourself. They won’t know the destination fast enough, so they have to launch their own nuclear weapons!
The only lesson Russia ever taught the US is that maintenance is very important
That would be THE END OF RUSSIA. China and North Korea would split it and incorporate most of Asian part.
Dude you do realize that you F-22 in this video is an AV8 Harrier right? You got the SU 57 right but the plane you are calling the F-22 is not snapped anything like an F-22. It’s shaped like a Harrier jump jet or an F-8 Crusader which is an old outdated and no longer flown aircraft. I think the Harrier is still being flown but the last thing it or the F-8 is is stealth.
Thw Russian Military can not even stop their Wagner force how could they stop a NATO force.
“Where are we gonna buy track suits now?” got me 😂😂
I'm skeptical President Biden could get out enough of a sentence to talk to multiple allies.
BTW. You 'Drop' bombs. You 'Launch' missiles.
Once Joe Biden heard, he made everyone aware that he was going to take care of Stalin
😂😂😂😂
Idk what is scarier putins instability or Bidens competence to handle the situation
Based on russia maintenance on planes , tanks and so on I would be shocked if be don’t explode inside russia lol
Old joke not holding up on your comedy tour if over 350, 000 Ukrainian soldiers are KIA
@@JuniousC.Thomas most of the western world are in delusional mode.
You won’t be laughing soon.
Putin is a glonass man and needs to take responsibility for his actions.😐