49:40 I’ve never sounded more like Charles Hawtrey. Then I slowed down from x1.7 & sounded like Charles Laughton. Is there no happy medium? Watching now, as Rachel lists some books, I’m reminded of what *Orson Welles* recalled late in life. Welles was dining alone minding his own business when the waiter returned & asked for his autograph, which he gave. The waiter said he loved *Citizen Kane* - - & has Mr Welles ever filmed anything else we should be on the lookout for since then? This was 1973! Welles put down his cutlery, peeved but patient, & listed his filmography from *Citizen Kane to F For Fake* … but halfway through, an *L.A. Times* columnist entered the restaurant. All the columnist knew was Hollywood exile Orson Welles was sat alone at his table listing his own screen credits to the restaurant - - & that’s how he wrote it up in his column! “ *For YEARS that’s bothered me!* ” Welles laughed about it 10 years later: “ *The idea that a director for no reason would start listing his screen credits in a restaurant!* ” I love it that Welles was doubled-up laughing at the absurdity. I can see there’ll be more for me to answer for in this episode, I can see it coming! But this Welles anecdote should stand alone. What a raconteur Welles was. And what a director.
59:44 Right to reply? I could address it if Marty wants, but I don’t think Marty wants. Marty is thinking Tokyo Brian isn’t looking like the best host in all this & probably senses there’ll be other times, not yet but months ahead &dbase notwithstanding. Marty is getting in some damage limitation practice & TB is businessman enough to let him do it with deniability, the old Nixon-Colson combo (next week’s thumbnail!). I could be more direct than that, if Marty wants. 1:00:00 Yes you got me bang to rights there, Rachel: *Stuck in the past!* but way further back than 2 years - - try 6 decades! No, you won’t get me to move on. Strange synchronicity here on the hour: Stunty is my opposite, closer to your moving-on sensibility actually. I’m nostalgic 24 hrs a day. Stunty says Nostalgia is the enemy: Nostalgia repeats itself! But so what? Stunty is a good guest to invite when he’s not dumbing down, & (talking about Nostalgia) didn’t he work well with Putterman? & on a good day (not last Wednesday) though I corresponded with Alan Moore he knows his Alan Moore lore more than I do. So: Credit where credit’s due. *Credit where credit’s due* is an old code: to acknowledge credit in any friend or foe unconditionally. There’s probably an equivalent translation in Japanese honour-code: *Credit where credit’s due* . I don’t think for a minute that’s what MartyinOregon was doing, or whether Marty even has that code of honour, but it’s good code. That’s why I credited ricefieldrecords for appearing in what he thought would be a hostile show: not because he asked for it but because Credit where credit’s due anyway: unconditionally. If ppl don’t have that code, they become meanspirited: smallminded. Speaking of which: Right to reply to Vag? Well, how can I be more direct than what I already said: that self-appointed spokesman already came close to scuppering this show. I see no Credit where credit’s due with this nasty piece of work. You can't see the danger, Rachel, so look out. He makes ricefieldrecords look completely genuine by contrast. Jayzus this could turn into a 6-way Donovan’s Reef barroom brawl in Comments or a come-onscreen-&-say-that barnburner - - & the lawyers' season is about to gear up on yt! I better say something conciliatory fast! hang on… As always, Rachel, I’ll skip town any time you find my independence hardgoing, because you know I'm not changing any time soon. End of year is a good call! After all, the only reason you can predict what I’ll say next is I’ve said it before.
Hi 4D, miss you! in my observation you’re often very accurate in your assessments but also, on occasion, you are beset by baffling blind spots. I don’t know Vaginyl especially well but I’ve detected a sense of mischief, of humour, of empathy, and of justice. I have not seen evidence of “a nasty piece of work” and would be interested in understanding what led you to this conclusion.
I see two more purchases in your future, a Rel subwoofer (T/7x or T/9x) and then the EAR Phonobox, then you can rest. 🤣 The Harbeths would go nicely with either of those subs.
Thanks for the forecast! Just a quick off-topic question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
#wellread🙃🏆🏅🎖
Yay! 🥰
49:40 I’ve never sounded more like Charles Hawtrey. Then I slowed down from x1.7 & sounded like Charles Laughton. Is there no happy medium?
Watching now, as Rachel lists some books, I’m reminded of what *Orson Welles* recalled late in life. Welles was dining alone minding his own business when the waiter returned & asked for his autograph, which he gave.
The waiter said he loved *Citizen Kane* - - & has Mr Welles ever filmed anything else we should be on the lookout for since then? This was 1973!
Welles put down his cutlery, peeved but patient, & listed his filmography from *Citizen Kane to F For Fake* … but halfway through, an *L.A. Times* columnist entered the restaurant.
All the columnist knew was Hollywood exile Orson Welles was sat alone at his table listing his own screen credits to the restaurant - - & that’s how he wrote it up in his column!
“ *For YEARS that’s bothered me!* ” Welles laughed about it 10 years later: “ *The idea that a director for no reason would start listing his screen credits in a restaurant!* ” I love it that Welles was doubled-up laughing at the absurdity.
I can see there’ll be more for me to answer for in this episode, I can see it coming! But this Welles anecdote should stand alone. What a raconteur Welles was. And what a director.
❤
Thank you, Patrik! ❤️
Thank you, 4D - a lovely anecdote indeed. 👍🙂
What guitar hangsback there?
A few ... Les Paul Traditional, A Mexican Tele and a Catseye Gretsch 😎👍
59:44 Right to reply? I could address it if Marty wants, but I don’t think Marty wants. Marty is thinking Tokyo Brian isn’t looking like the best host in all this & probably senses there’ll be other times, not yet but months ahead &dbase notwithstanding. Marty is getting in some damage limitation practice & TB is businessman enough to let him do it with deniability, the old Nixon-Colson combo (next week’s thumbnail!). I could be more direct than that, if Marty wants.
1:00:00 Yes you got me bang to rights there, Rachel: *Stuck in the past!* but way further back than 2 years - - try 6 decades! No, you won’t get me to move on.
Strange synchronicity here on the hour: Stunty is my opposite, closer to your moving-on sensibility actually. I’m nostalgic 24 hrs a day. Stunty says Nostalgia is the enemy: Nostalgia repeats itself!
But so what? Stunty is a good guest to invite when he’s not dumbing down, & (talking about Nostalgia) didn’t he work well with Putterman? & on a good day (not last Wednesday) though I corresponded with Alan Moore he knows his Alan Moore lore more than I do. So: Credit where credit’s due.
*Credit where credit’s due* is an old code: to acknowledge credit in any friend or foe unconditionally.
There’s probably an equivalent translation in Japanese honour-code: *Credit where credit’s due* .
I don’t think for a minute that’s what MartyinOregon was doing, or whether Marty even has that code of honour, but it’s good code.
That’s why I credited ricefieldrecords for appearing in what he thought would be a hostile show: not because he asked for it but because Credit where credit’s due anyway: unconditionally.
If ppl don’t have that code, they become meanspirited: smallminded. Speaking of which:
Right to reply to Vag? Well, how can I be more direct than what I already said: that self-appointed spokesman already came close to scuppering this show. I see no Credit where credit’s due with this nasty piece of work. You can't see the danger, Rachel, so look out. He makes ricefieldrecords look completely genuine by contrast.
Jayzus this could turn into a 6-way Donovan’s Reef barroom brawl in Comments or a come-onscreen-&-say-that barnburner - - & the lawyers' season is about to gear up on yt! I better say something conciliatory fast! hang on…
As always, Rachel, I’ll skip town any time you find my independence hardgoing, because you know I'm not changing any time soon. End of year is a good call! After all, the only reason you can predict what I’ll say next is I’ve said it before.
Vag is salt of the earth! Marty is a gent and Brian is finding his way. Happy Christmas and Season's Greetings, 4D 🥰
Oh! BTW, I also read Charles' Colson's autobiography "Born Again" - some good insights there. 😁👍#wellread
@@rachelsghost #wellread🙃
Hi 4D, miss you! in my observation you’re often very accurate in your assessments but also, on occasion, you are beset by baffling blind spots. I don’t know Vaginyl especially well but I’ve detected a sense of mischief, of humour, of empathy, and of justice. I have not seen evidence of “a nasty piece of work” and would be interested in understanding what led you to this conclusion.
I see two more purchases in your future, a Rel subwoofer (T/7x or T/9x) and then the EAR Phonobox, then you can rest. 🤣
The Harbeths would go nicely with either of those subs.
It never ends, Pep 😂👍
We’re all praying for 4D Man and hoping that he can get the help he needs
😬🤭
Thanks for the forecast! Just a quick off-topic question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
Thanks Phil! 👍