In the Prisoner of Azkaban, Hermione plainly stated that Professor Mcgonagall had to write "all sorts of letters swearing that Hermione was a model student and would never misuse the time turner". I find it unlikely that professor Mcgonagall would not know about it as she was responsible for Hermione's schedule. As for being familiar with aspects of the hall of mysteries, it's likely that she would have had to go there with professor Mcgonagall to receive it.
@@crushedscouter9522 what are you talking about "thief?" I seriously just finished rereading PoA less than a week ago and that's exactly what Hermione says.
My favorite theory from this list is the one that Hermione might be distantly related to Hector Dagworth-Granger because it feels like the most possible to be true.
I have always felt that this is so. She gives answers that are directly textbook, but she's also gifted with a logical, analytical mind. A true 1-2 academic punch!
I thought this one was the soundest of the theories mentioned. Otherwise, speculating on what the author might have been thinking, why introduce the Slughorn line at all? This "end" ultimately is left open, and the better for it. :)
I think it's seems legit, with one of her parents was a squib, otherwise how would her parents think when she got her letter from hogwarts and already knew about the school. Here is a line from the film (not sure if it was in the books) : "I read all about it Hogwarts: a history"
@@ClockworkMan13 It is a little of a retcon but Rowling said that muggle borns are children of multi generational squibs. Wizards we’re so snobby they didn’t even bother to look into their squib children’s lives. Most were abandoned to live in the muggle world. Squibs marrying other squibs we’re going to produce magical children.
If Hermione already went to the department of mysteries, she would have known that you just need to ask the turning hall for it to stop on the right door.
The time turner theory sounds interesting, but I don't think it stands at all. Firstly, Hermione might have occasionally broken the rules, but it was never for her own gain. It's very hard to think she would steal a time turner for herself, even to be able to study more. Secondly, keep in mind that Ron - Ron! - noticed that Hermione's schedule was weird and that she kept up popping all over the place (I admit I don't remember if the popping up was a book thing too or just in the movies, but the schedule thing was in the book). If Ron noticed, other people were sure to notice, especially the teachers. Among which, McGonagall. And while Dumbledore might have played fast and loose with the rules, McGonagall sure as hell didn't. Thirdly, I see nothing unusual about Hermione knowing about the time turners at the Ministry. If she received the time turner legally, she must have gone through a thorough screening process, and I doubt that was done by Dumbledore and McGonagall alone. So she most likely paid more than one visit to the specific department at the Ministry.
In addition to your points, I could see the ministry being ok with Harry Potter's super responsible best friend (never ron) having a time turner since they were worried about Sirius Black coming after him. Sirius kills Harry? Bam! Best friend to the rescue.
I am not sure if it was said somewhere where the time turner came from, but it is quite possible that Dumbledore, who collected many rare magical objects over the years, also owned this time turner.
Well, Hermione doesn't wipe her parents memories, she modifies them to make sure they move to Australia and think they have no daughter. She specifically does this so that she can undo it later.
I once thought up a crackpot theory where I imagined Hermione is not actually contemporary to Harry and Ron, that she came from an apocalyptic future where Voldemort had won, and Hermione was part of a group of underground witches and wizards who are resisting Voldemort's regime, and they sent her back in time using a time turner to Harry's first year attending Hogwarts, so she could protect Harry and help him eventually defeat Voldemort.
@@drishalballaney No my theory was that she was the child of anti-Voldemort resistance fighters, and was chosen for the mission due to her being a prodigy and happened to be the same age as Harry was on his first year at Hogwarts.
@@drishalballaney TBH I didn't think that far into it. I guess in this scenario they were a childless muggle couple that Hermione bewitched into thinking she was their daughter. She could have used memory charms on them, plus masquerading as a muggle-born would be a good cover story for her lack of history in Harry's timeline.
I agree with theory two because in Philosopher’s Stone rob talks about a uncle or cousin on his moms side that is an accountant but “we don’t talk about him”
For goodness sake? What is wrong with the idea that male and female people can actually be friends without romantic or family connections? I'm a straight guy, I have a lot of female friends, one in particular I do! consider to be "like!", a sister, but there is zero romantic feeling about them, and zero family relationship either. Luke and leya were both force sensative, so could pick up the connection even before they knew, but most people, just have to go on feelings. What the hell is wrong with this generation, and the idea of none sexual, none family related friendship? Makes me sort of sad for the world really.
No one says they can’t be friends. However, JK admitted that she only put Ron with Hermione because she didn’t want to write the classic “hero gets the girl” trope. That’s why in this instance it’s a problem. She wrote the 2 of them as closer than friends, because that’s what she originally wanted. Despite her changing her mind, her subconscious is going to leak through her original intent. Men and women can certainly be friends. I have one myself over 17 years, and we’re both happily married to others, and I have a daughter who loves her godmother. But, with Harry and Hermione, nah, they clearly had more interest in each other than just simple friendship, and I hate that JK went against herself just to satisfy being different. While we talk about wrong couples, can we please not ignore the tragedy of George and Angelina?! That is the most unhealthy relationship in the whole series! (If you ignore Voldermort and Bellatrix which I do as it’s not cannon).
@@Shan_Dalamani Angelina is Fred’s ex. Considering Fred died never breaking up with her, she went for the look a like. She would see her dead boyfriend every day. She settled for the closest thing to Fred since she couldn’t have him. As for George, he marries his brother’s girl. The one person who was attached to Fred’s memory. There’s so many psychological traumas that they went through, and I don’t think anyone in their right mind finds it healthy that they got together.
@@Bballfan1992 Two of my brothers were attracted to the same women. And my brother are 8 years apart in age. My older brothers wife had an affair with my other brother. He was 20 and she was 30. A few years later, my now divorced brother started dating a girl who was a few months older than me, again she and my other brother became attracted to each other and married. They divorced a few years later. They both liked the women who were similar and just couldn’t be faithful. Both brothers married and divorced twice and have remained single for years now. Both of these brothers grew up doing similar things, one the first born, the other the sixth born. Three sisters and one other between them. I’m the only one that learned by watching the mistakes of older siblings and never married. Just lived with the same guy for over 30!years. I’m the last born.
I think Harry and Ginny are a great couple in the books, and awful in the movies. And Hermione and Ron are a good couple in the books, and alright in the movies.
Wow, I always hear people say the opposite about Hermione and Ron - that they were better in the books as a couple. Could you explain why you feel the movie couple is the better one? I'm really curious!
@@katarinamor oh wait yeah I got it backwards! I meant Hermione and Ron are great in the books but alright in the movies. Because the movies made Harry and Ginny so bad together, I feel like they made Harry and Hermione closer than they really were. (Romantically)
The problem with the theory that Herminone changed her parents memory before book seven is that she didn't spent the christmas holidays in half blood prince with Harry or Ron, which is the last holiday before the memory change.
Also she wouldn't be able to use magic due to being underage. Well, in theory she could if a wizard were to visit their house, but then that would attract attention. And I don't think Hermione would risk getting *expelled* for using memory charms on her parents while being underage and under a trace.
I love all the content, I went to universal studios and got a tour of universal studios and when we came to diagon Ally, he asked where Harry got all his money and I remembered the video you put out about where Harry got all his money and I told him about sleekeasy, he said I was the the first person to ever get it, thanks for all the content ❤️
@@Shan_Dalamani she would. She developed street-smartness during third year, the same time she had some sort of rebellious tendencies (for hermione it is really rebellious to drop one of classes). Somehow she managed to use time turner. I don’t say she is super street genius, but she had enough to think about her parents in advance AND find a way to stay at her friends’. Not too hard.
@@Blabla_bloblo Why should she wipe their memoriesout before her 7th year?? There is no reason. Just because Voldemort is back it doesn't mean that he wanna kill everybody's familiy who has something to do with Harry. I mean, at the time she wasn't even in the order and Voldemort had no reason to track her parents down. At the time he knew where harry was (in Hogwarts), and the only reason Voldemort might be looking for Hermione's parents is because they might have information about Harry and Hermione and, most importantly, where they are.
@@Karol-ei1fc because! Voldemort is back, he tries to kill Harry in first 10 mins of his new life, Cedric is killed just because he was in the wrong place. The war is clearly coming. Voldemort isn’t known for his careful aiming to his ark remedy with avada, he destroys everything and everyone. The first war has shown that no one is safe, especially “good guys” and their loved ones, and hermione is muggleborne on top of being Harry’s best friend. Loooots of reasons to think in advance. Who knew, maybe it would take less time to start the war. And she took care.
It's always entertaining to listen to these theories. Some of them are quite fascinating. Please do the additional 5 about Hermione and I'd love to hear about the other characters as well.
Specifically, Wands that can be casted but at a cost. Like a spell that could take a year off your life or a spell that will only work if you give up some of your blood
But if Hermione whiped her parents' memory earlier wouldn't the ministery be aware of it and would have send her a letter because being under age and using magic (against muggles)?
@@suhayo3042 The way time turners work is that the user still ages when they repeat however many hours they've repeated. Hermione's constant use of it during her third year meant that she was actually older by more than a normal amount by the end of that year than she would have been if she hadn't been using it. So Hermione was actually 17 (and therefore of age) well before the normal time would have been, and therefore would not have been guilty of using underage magic.
I have a very common yet unique surname. My surname is spelled, "Jeffery." A lot of people around the world are named Jeffrey, Geoffrey, Jeffry, etc. Almost no one in has a surname of Jeffery. If I see it spelled this way, we are somehow related, even if I haven't met them.
i always found 2 things odd in regards to hermione when reading the stories. I wouldn't say they are theories but in terms of the writing/story 1: that at such a young age, even if she was very academic, she was trusted with a time turner. I mean a muggle born with such a powerful magical tool that's normally hidden in the ministry of magic? it didn't make sense to me. It would have made a lot more sense to have a teacher have it and bring her along to get to her classes and at the end dumbledor could have given her the turner and say something like "I'm sure a smart girl like you realizes how to use it. Two should be enough." 2: that she was basically so "this can't be real/a thing/ etc" especially in book 7. I mean she was a muggle born raised on fairy tales and told that magics fake/pretend/etc and then suddenly learns that all sorts of stuff that was fake/pretend/etc turned out to be real and yet this one aspect of magic was to over the top? The fact that so much she was told about as being fake turned out to be real made it seem more weird that she was so against the possibility that other things thought of as fake, aka wizard fairy tales, CAN'T be real. i mean she saw what cant be real as being rule already. why is that the exception?
if Hermoine is a muggle born witch but a witch just the same how does it make her children half - blood ? shouldn't they be pure blood as both parents were witches ? -- had either she or Ron married a muggle than those offspring would be "half - blood " one magical parent + one muggle = half blood children but two magical parents ( pure blood.1/2 blood or muggle born ) would have pure blood kids
Harry is considered a half-blood even if both his parents are magical I think there has to be 3 lines of magical parents before they are considered full blood
can the accio spell be used to kill someone like summoning a knife behind the person. would it find an unobstructed way towards you or force its way through the person. does spell mastery allow you to choose either.
I think if there is an unobstructed way the object uses it. If the object used the straight way through everything Harry's firebolt would probably have been damaged when he summoned it from the dorm to the dragon arena. There is however also a spell which sends objects away. This one could be used.
I might be wrong but i do remember some scenes when wizards “summon” small items like books behind another person and that person “dodges” the items path or gets hit. Might be a wrong spell but accio is the spell that brings items towards the caster.
Hermione's true parents( both magical) were killed by dark side while a baby . Then she took the place of a muggle baby killed accidentally by such act . Etc etc . Simple . She an her muggle parents never knew , an still doesn't .
I have thought that Hermione could sent her parents away after the third task; however the Granger home was still Hermione's. After the war she brought her patents back from Australia. When she wasn't in school she was with them most of the time. Until she married Ron.
For Harry and Hermione to be brother and sister and be in the same year at Hogwarts, they would very likely have to be twins. I suppose they could be more than nine months apart and still be in the same class, but it seems unlikely. The Dursleys never mentioned a niece but why would they. The most damning refutation, why would a prosperous couple like the Potters have put her up for adoption?
Video idea for you to do: What additional effects do spells have that are not seen in the movies? For instance, what else can the patronus charm do besides ward off dementors?
I like the idea of Hermione stealing the time turner because I can’t picture a character like Minerva giving a student such an unfair advantage over all the others when there are other ways of helping them
But the theory falls to the ground on the fact that Hermionie would be smart enough not to break dozens of laws by breaking into the ministerium of magic and thus risking her entire life and education just to be able to take a couple of more classes. And the time turner was not given to her to give her an advantage but because she was actually awarded best student of the year and highest average grades and wanted to take extra classes but needed more time to do so, but that only meant extra homework which as seen in the books stresses her out because its starting to become too much which increases the chances of getting a lower grade because you are stressed and starts to unfocus, also why would dumbledore on purpose help Hermionie break rules and laws that he also knew could cost her both her education her wand and possibly even a trip to Azkaban? Dumbledore liked to jest and prank, but no way he would risk an innocent students life just on a burglar job.
Here’s another theory about Hermione. What if the Beauty and the Beast remake takes place in the Harry Potter universe and Belle is Hermione’s Squib ancestor? Think about it: Both are played by Emma Watson and both are strong heroines who are also bookworms.
*i like that one...would also be interesting if the world of Fables graphic novel (By Bill Willingham) also intersect with the wizarding world...the game by Tell Tale Games The Wolf among us was excellent...the play through videos on yt are well worth checking out*
I hate it!! You can't take as argument that they are both played by Emma Watson! U must leave it out, bc the actor shouldn't influence the story! And both stories are based on books, and in the books Emma is so irrelevant like me. And i hate also when ppl start to mix fantasy worlds with each other. PS: Sorry for the little freakout
@@YellowBear-kx1ff Wow both love books and are heroines, I think you'll also find two heroes who love books, doesn't mean that they're the same person. And how I said, U can't mix them, J.K created the WW, not Disney. So You must always stay in one of them.
Yeah the last theory is entirely plausible apart from the fact that at the start of the school McGonnagall had a meeting with Harry and Hermione (Harry because of the Dementor attack) but then Harry is asked to wait outside the office while McGonnagall talks to Hermione, you could probably explain the fact that she knew about the time turners being in there because she literally watched a death eater's head turn back into baby form over and over again, it probably would have also been in the Dailey Prophet , it's not the first time the Prophet reported things it wasn't meant to, after all, the Prophet isn't strictly part of the Ministry, they write what they want anyway
The Hermione homeless theory really only works as happening in the 5th book. She is supposed to spend Christmas skiing with her parents. She could easily have used going home to wipe their memories as adult wizards would be there collecting their children. Then she could have gone to Grimmauld Place where she eventually ends up. It would be longer than initially expected, but not much longer
Hermione being a secret child the Potters gave up for adoption, makes no sense. Her and Harry are the same age right? Ya, they could be twins, would be an argument. But you would be sayng, the Potters couldn’t handle two kids. Wizards and Witches are human right? They have to go through 9 months of pregnancy, right? Or do Witches have short pregnancies? Or can Witches shoot out babies, whenever they want?
"Her relationship with Harry was very sisterly and their relationship had something special but not romamtic" Oh, You mean like me and my 3 female best friends who I consider to be mu sisters inspite of having no relation to their families what so ever? I agree, that theory is the hight of weak.
#1 I have a simpler explanation: I could see Dumbledore or McGonagall give her a brief lecture about Time Turners, where they come from and how they work right before giving her one.
Other Theory: Hermione was imperiused by Dumbledore (Until before Half-Blood Prince). So In Philosopher Stone she leads Harry to the the stone like Dumbledore wanted (why that will be another theory). Also in following films she is a big help. Also how could she have known spells before Hogwarts as a muggle-born? Do they not get suprised by the letter like Harry.
I think the Time Turner is more likely her being given a scholarship(ish) thing for being an Unspeakable, given her study record and intelligence and Minerva being an insider/recruiter for them. I find that more understandable than Dumbledore giving her a reality breaker for studies. That is, if he did not know of Sirius' break out and innocence prior.
No one: Hermione: Oh no, I can't take 500 classes, only logical explanation is to sneak into the government building and yoink myself a nice clock thingy!
I always took issue with her using obliviate on her parents, purely because that doesn't prevent them from being used against her to get to her. It made no sense. Memory or not they could still take them and use them as leverage against her despite the fact they have no memory of her, because she herself remembers rather than them.
Professor Mcgonagall wrote many letters to the ministry officials for granting Hermoine the Time turner and wrote specifically that she will use it only for educational purposes. She was also not the 1st to have it,atleast Barty crouch Jr.,Bill and Percy weasley also had it so it wasn't uncommon.
For the 2nd theory in the video. Hermione does say in the book a line similar to "Her parents said she could come" . Or something along those lines, I believe in the Order of the Phoenix. I mean, she could be lying but this slightly disproves the theory.
Ron hung out with Harry much more than Hermione did in the story and logically when not part of the story, but they were not lovers or twins. You see children Long long ago in a land outside of your home, we used to have friends and we actually talked together and played indoor and outdoor games that didn't require wifi or a cell phone. We had what they called "a life". and everyone had one. So this part of the story begins in 1991, when 11 year old Harry first came to Hogwarts. So Harry had 11 years of fishing, playing monopoly, shooting hoops and reading books before he went to Hogwarts. By the time I was 11, I had many girls that were in the neighborhood or at school that we were fond of each other for a while as life is about feeling your way and working on your people skills. We didn't sit around dreaming about drag queens or spend a lot of time pulling for Johnny or Amber. Today is no different. I've spent a few hours out and about today, but I do spend way too much time using the internet This story starts out as a child's tale for children. But that's not what it's about at all as you've taken a very good child story and turned it into a political agenda.
Except Harry didn't. He had 10 years of physical and mental abuse and not being allowed adequate food, clothing, medical care, and wasn't treated with the slightest amount of respect. He was also denied every opportunity for fun (the only reason he went to the zoo was because Arabella Figg couldn't babysit that day).
While I never had heard of number 2 actually likes it as that would explain how she was magical if the only way was through a regressive gene. So her father would have had to be related several generations back.
The theory about Harry and Hermione being siblings doesn't seem plausible, especially when JK Rowling said she considered having Harry and Hermione end up together before she decided to have Harry with Ginny and Hermione with Ron. Regarding the time turner, Hermione did say that McGonagall gave her the time turner and wrote all kinds of letters swearing that Hermione wasn't the kind of person to misuse the time turner. Plus McGonagall was the person who handed out the schedules, surely she would have noticed Hermione having two classes at the same time. Regarding Hermione "wiping" her parents memory in advance, how would she have gotten away with underage magic use. Remember that the Ministry of Magic reacted to Harry doing just that (using magic underage). The theory is plausible because Hermione spent every summer (from Prisoner of Azkaban on) with the Weasleys. Surely Hermione's parents would have wanted to spend time with their daughter during the summer once the school year was done.
The one about the time turner can easily be explained away as she had to go to the ministry to apply for the use of a time turner cause I seriously doubt McGonagle or Dumbledore would have just told her how to steal it. If they would have stolen it they would have done it themselves
I definitely don't agree with the time turner theory, McGonagall did know her schedule so she would have known that she was supposed to be in too many places at once. Besides I'm pretty sure that Percy would almost certainly have needed one as well due to how many subjects he took, and maybe other students too but they would have kept a close watch on them and probably had to be cleared with the ministry for each student that got one.
I totally go with the 4th Theory. I not only believe that for Hermione but for all Muggle-Born Witches and Wizards. Whether it was a few years ago or hundreds of thousands of years ago, these ppl must've had atleast one or two Pure-Blood Witch/Wizard in their Bloodline. And most Importantly Hermione is better paired with Harry than Ron. But still love Ron though. Actually more than Harry, Emma Watson's Hermione will be better paired with me. There's not a HP fan who hasnt had a crush on her.
Like this movie! But I have a question. If hermione and dumbledore took the time turner does this mean that he also too it for Charlie and Percy as they also are said to have having as many owls as well as
Luckily these wonderful film adaptations came out when they did, otherwise current Hollywood naming / casting conventions would have replaced every instance of "Harry Potter" with "Hermione Granger" in the movie titles. Additional changes would be thus: Harry - an angry Goth - would simp for Aunt Petunia and have an angry, unrequited crush on Dudley. Ron would have a pronounced stutter, an 18-inch blue mohawk, be confined to a wheelchair and come from a large blended pureblood family. His parents, Mrs. and Mrs. Weasley own a combination BnB / Health food shoppe in Diagon Alley and for 50 galleons a week, they let Xenophilius Lovegood secretly sell Wizard-Hemp from a small back room. Hagrid is openly transitioning to Olympe Maxime. All of the House Elves are actually Squibs who identify as Furries. The basic premise: On Wednesday, 31 October 1981, after breaking into Lilly's home, Voldemort easily killed Lilly's Baby-Daddy, who had been cowering in the corner all day crying because Lilly had scolded him about not properly drying and storing her new spalted-Hornbeam Charcuterie Board. Lilly -- who had been showering - immediately leapt from the bathroom having only time to clad herself in a Quilted Flannel Invisibility Jacket and an old comfy pair of her late birth person's Doc Martens. Her wand was still absentmindedly stirring several ounces of pumpkin spice into a pitcher of iced-Vodka on the bathroom sink. The duo met at the threshold of Baby Harry’s nursery door. Her eyes locked with those of the Dark Lord and she saw that he was suddenly AFRAID. A grueling 45-minute combination wand-dual / epic martial arts battle ensued and using trickery, copious amounts of mansplaining and the occasional successful Levicorpus spell, Lord Voldemort managed to achieve a series of lucky shots with an enchanted SPAS-12 loaded with special 00 Dragon Heartstrings shells. He murdered Lilly Evans that night. He preceded through the nursery doorway and just as he reared up to his full height of 4-foot 8 and unleashed the killing curse upon baby Harry, two-year old Hermione Granger leapt in between them and using her binkie and two-newly formed buck teeth as pseudo-fulcrums, snapped-kicked the curse back into Lord Voldemort’s face, destroying his physical body immediately. Her secret shame was that she arrived too late to save Harry's strong, independent mother.
Technically, she should be at least a couple weeks older than her classmates since via the timeturner she lived through the duration of a class twice when taking two subjects at the same time. Over the course of a year this must’ve added up to at least a few weeks in pure time.
My personal theory on Muggle Born is they are in fact descended of witches and wizards. They're directly descended from squibs... in many ways she could have been related to Merlin or Rowena Ravenclaw due to her studious nature. I also thought the Weasleys were the descendants of Godric Gryffindor because they are all sorted into Gryffindor.
Since there’s only a thousand students at a time attending Hogwarts, there might be only about 10,000 wizards in Britain tops, so if you go back a couple generations every wizard or witch are probably in some way related to each other. I remember Iceland with 500,000 inhabitants having to introduce an app for icelanders to make sure they weren’t accidentaly dating their relatives. Imagine how much more of a probability that is with only 10k or so.
Hermione's parents didnt even have a single line in the books.... not even in the scenes they were present.... why would jk spend much time describing them when more prominent characters that actually had lines didnt even get a description, like lavender brown
how can Harry and hermione be siblings unless James had an affair which I doubt he did. Harry is born in August and Hermione in September of the same year so its impossible
Jk Rowling said Harry and Hermione should have ended up together YEARS after the books were done. At that point, her popularity was soaring, and she would have said ANYTHING/EVERYTHING to please her fans. And she was basing that on her own marriage. She practically said her new husband was "Harry Potter." Last of all, NONE of the books ever even HINT at Harry+ Hermione being romantically attracted to one another. But here I am, a grown man fussing over some children's book.
Can you please cover why did voldemort died when Harry won with an Expelliarmus? Shouldn't it only take away voldemort's wand? How did he got killed in that most dramatic paper-burning-ash-rising way?
He didn't die from Expelliarmus. He cast Avada Kedavra at Harry, which rebounded at him when the wand in Harry's hand overpowered the one he had. He was hit by both spells.
I would like to know what would have happened if Valdermort had used a tempal manipulation device to travel back in time and give his younger self information about what was to come.
Becuase Time Turners cannot change the past. Anything you try to do would have already happened becuase your future is now part of the past. Also becuase HP is fictional and that would mess up the story.
Because Professor McGonagall visited the family to tell them Hermione was a witch? The same way all muggleborns are told? Did you really think that the school would just leave them to figure it out by themselves?
Yeah they could've. When they took over the order, they got access to Hermiones records, including her family address. And not to mention, they probably had spies in the muggke government tracking down muggle borns
Theory three... Education at muggle schools BEFORE reaching the age of eleven will not be good for knowing a lot about muggle subjects. It's primary school level. Only a very few exceptions , bright children, with very rich parents who can afford private payed lessons to their child will learn more during primary school time. Remember also....in the 1990-2000 years there was NO suitable internet for extra learning for smart kids available. Also I suppose most witch children (at least halfbloods) will go to any primary school, learning writing, basic counting and so on....and those primary schools are muggle schools. It's not that Hogwarts students start with knowing nothing and not even able to write anything. This third theory does not have my support.... Of coarse Hermione is smart enough to learn all muggle educations normally thaught during a year on a muggle school in only the few weeks holiday from Hogwarts....but than...that's not PRIOR to Hogwarts but DURING her Hogwarts time (first years when she still went most of the time to her parents during holidays) Also the first one....Hermione is the same age as Harry, but not the same date of birth . Making it near to impossible, even from witches, to be brother and sister.....only twins could be in the same year invited to Hogwarts. Relating to Harry as full cousin however is not impossible but very unlikely because both...Lily AND James where witches. But a relation is not impossible because the parents from Lily were not magical. One of them could have a sister/brother whose child married with the Granger father from Hermione. (And Petunia is the only sister from Lily herself....)
Hermione is a year older than Harry but ended up in his year because she had to wait nearly a whole year after her 11th birthday. She used the time to finish her last year of Muggle school and pre-study as much as she could of her first-year magical curriculum (not to mention her favorite book, Hogwarts: A History).
Don’t believe the second one about wiping her parent’s memory before book 7. Simply the Trace would have found her being muggle born. With no adult wizards in the house she would have been expelled and wand snapped.
Hermione could not have modified her parents memory earlier, because she had thw trace on her. And her inteligence and acedemic acumen are from her parents qhoare both soctors o f dentistry. So she was probably pushed quite hard as a young child.
Thanks for watching folks! Who should I do this for next?
Are there any theories about Hannah Abbott, or Pansy Parkinson. Or theories on Luna.
Neville is an important but underwritten character. Are there any good/terrible/hilarious theories about him?
@@baystated Neville is a good one too.
Hagrid
Luna lovegood 🙄🙄
In the Prisoner of Azkaban, Hermione plainly stated that Professor Mcgonagall had to write "all sorts of letters swearing that Hermione was a model student and would never misuse the time turner". I find it unlikely that professor Mcgonagall would not know about it as she was responsible for Hermione's schedule. As for being familiar with aspects of the hall of mysteries, it's likely that she would have had to go there with professor Mcgonagall to receive it.
I agree. I figure the letters and then probably an interview to establish her character.
The thief said McGonagall gave her the ok? Lol you'd be the worst detective of all time
@@crushedscouter9522 what are you talking about "thief?"
I seriously just finished rereading PoA less than a week ago and that's exactly what Hermione says.
@@crushedscouter9522 But Professor McGonagall hands out schedules to the students, so she knows that Hermione has 2 classes at the same time.
@@lokei1326 the one who would be stealing said they didn't steal. you see no holes in that logic? there's no way you're this dense
My favorite theory from this list is the one that Hermione might be distantly related to Hector Dagworth-Granger because it feels like the most possible to be true.
I think your right because Rowling said muggle borns are descended from squibs.
I think Hermione has a photographic memory. Which is why she hates or doesn’t do as good in classes that don’t need a book.
I have always felt that this is so. She gives answers that are directly textbook, but she's also gifted with a logical, analytical mind. A true 1-2 academic punch!
Wow that actually makes sense
everyone does, the difference is that Hermione actually pays attention
@@defeatSpace Not everyone has photographic memory
@@geralt8394 everyone has the capacity to build this habit/skill whatever you want to call it
I liked the idea that Hector Dagworth-Granger was a distant relative of the Hermione for some reason
I thought this one was the soundest of the theories mentioned. Otherwise, speculating on what the author might have been thinking, why introduce the Slughorn line at all? This "end" ultimately is left open, and the better for it. :)
I think it's seems legit, with one of her parents was a squib, otherwise how would her parents think when she got her letter from hogwarts and already knew about the school. Here is a line from the film (not sure if it was in the books) : "I read all about it Hogwarts: a history"
I think it kind of takes away from Hermione being a self-made witch by giving her a special bloodline.
@@ClockworkMan13 It is a little of a retcon but Rowling said that muggle borns are children of multi generational squibs.
Wizards we’re so snobby they didn’t even bother to look into their squib children’s lives. Most were abandoned to live in the muggle world.
Squibs marrying other squibs we’re going to produce magical children.
If Hermione already went to the department of mysteries, she would have known that you just need to ask the turning hall for it to stop on the right door.
The time turner theory sounds interesting, but I don't think it stands at all.
Firstly, Hermione might have occasionally broken the rules, but it was never for her own gain. It's very hard to think she would steal a time turner for herself, even to be able to study more.
Secondly, keep in mind that Ron - Ron! - noticed that Hermione's schedule was weird and that she kept up popping all over the place (I admit I don't remember if the popping up was a book thing too or just in the movies, but the schedule thing was in the book). If Ron noticed, other people were sure to notice, especially the teachers. Among which, McGonagall. And while Dumbledore might have played fast and loose with the rules, McGonagall sure as hell didn't.
Thirdly, I see nothing unusual about Hermione knowing about the time turners at the Ministry. If she received the time turner legally, she must have gone through a thorough screening process, and I doubt that was done by Dumbledore and McGonagall alone. So she most likely paid more than one visit to the specific department at the Ministry.
In addition to your points, I could see the ministry being ok with Harry Potter's super responsible best friend (never ron) having a time turner since they were worried about Sirius Black coming after him. Sirius kills Harry? Bam! Best friend to the rescue.
I am not sure if it was said somewhere where the time turner came from, but it is quite possible that Dumbledore, who collected many rare magical objects over the years, also owned this time turner.
Well, Hermione doesn't wipe her parents memories, she modifies them to make sure they move to Australia and think they have no daughter. She specifically does this so that she can undo it later.
That's true and she does after the books she does indeed go to see
Also, if she did it in advance, how did she get away with the underage magic?
@@regulus7754 she is nearly a year older than Harry. She is not underage when she does.
@@jarlnils435 Ah, I didn’t think of that.
True
One aspect that I think would be great for Rowling to explore is the true nature of magic and heredity (as long as it's not midi-chlorians).
I once thought up a crackpot theory where I imagined Hermione is not actually contemporary to Harry and Ron, that she came from an apocalyptic future where Voldemort had won, and Hermione was part of a group of underground witches and wizards who are resisting Voldemort's regime, and they sent her back in time using a time turner to Harry's first year attending Hogwarts, so she could protect Harry and help him eventually defeat Voldemort.
tbh the problem is, she has to also de-age if she travels back in time and has to be MUCH more knowledgeable about the potential events
@@drishalballaney No my theory was that she was the child of anti-Voldemort resistance fighters, and was chosen for the mission due to her being a prodigy and happened to be the same age as Harry was on his first year at Hogwarts.
@@barbiquearea hmm this is actually kinda possible
But then how come Hermione's parents? 🤔🤔
@@drishalballaney TBH I didn't think that far into it. I guess in this scenario they were a childless muggle couple that Hermione bewitched into thinking she was their daughter. She could have used memory charms on them, plus masquerading as a muggle-born would be a good cover story for her lack of history in Harry's timeline.
@@barbiquearea highly possible tbh
5:34 "There is no wood!" - great thinking under preassure there 😆
I agree with theory two because in Philosopher’s Stone rob talks about a uncle or cousin on his moms side that is an accountant but “we don’t talk about him”
For goodness sake? What is wrong with the idea that male and female people can actually be friends without romantic or family connections?
I'm a straight guy, I have a lot of female friends, one in particular I do! consider to be "like!", a sister, but there is zero romantic feeling about them, and zero family relationship either.
Luke and leya were both force sensative, so could pick up the connection even before they knew, but most people, just have to go on feelings.
What the hell is wrong with this generation, and the idea of none sexual, none family related friendship? Makes me sort of sad for the world really.
No one says they can’t be friends. However, JK admitted that she only put Ron with Hermione because she didn’t want to write the classic “hero gets the girl” trope.
That’s why in this instance it’s a problem. She wrote the 2 of them as closer than friends, because that’s what she originally wanted. Despite her changing her mind, her subconscious is going to leak through her original intent.
Men and women can certainly be friends. I have one myself over 17 years, and we’re both happily married to others, and I have a daughter who loves her godmother. But, with Harry and Hermione, nah, they clearly had more interest in each other than just simple friendship, and I hate that JK went against herself just to satisfy being different.
While we talk about wrong couples, can we please not ignore the tragedy of George and Angelina?! That is the most unhealthy relationship in the whole series! (If you ignore Voldermort and Bellatrix which I do as it’s not cannon).
Luke and Leya is a really stup1d example because they kiss twice Lol
@@Bballfan1992 What's unhealthy about it? They like each other, they're both into Quidditch, so where's the problem?
@@Shan_Dalamani Angelina is Fred’s ex. Considering Fred died never breaking up with her, she went for the look a like. She would see her dead boyfriend every day. She settled for the closest thing to Fred since she couldn’t have him.
As for George, he marries his brother’s girl. The one person who was attached to Fred’s memory. There’s so many psychological traumas that they went through, and I don’t think anyone in their right mind finds it healthy that they got together.
@@Bballfan1992 Two of my brothers were attracted to the same women. And my brother are 8 years apart in age. My older brothers wife had an affair with my other brother. He was 20 and she was 30. A few years later, my now divorced brother started dating a girl who was a few months older than me, again she and my other brother became attracted to each other and married. They divorced a few years later. They both liked the women who were similar and just couldn’t be faithful. Both brothers married and divorced twice and have remained single for years now. Both of these brothers grew up doing similar things, one the first born, the other the sixth born. Three sisters and one other between them. I’m the only one that learned by watching the mistakes of older siblings and never married. Just lived with the same guy for over 30!years. I’m the last born.
I think Harry and Ginny are a great couple in the books, and awful in the movies.
And Hermione and Ron are a good couple in the books, and alright in the movies.
Wow, I always hear people say the opposite about Hermione and Ron - that they were better in the books as a couple. Could you explain why you feel the movie couple is the better one? I'm really curious!
@@katarinamor oh wait yeah I got it backwards! I meant Hermione and Ron are great in the books but alright in the movies. Because the movies made Harry and Ginny so bad together, I feel like they made Harry and Hermione closer than they really were. (Romantically)
Nah
The problem with the theory that Herminone changed her parents memory before book seven is that she didn't spent the christmas holidays in half blood prince with Harry or Ron, which is the last holiday before the memory change.
Also she wouldn't be able to use magic due to being underage. Well, in theory she could if a wizard were to visit their house, but then that would attract attention. And I don't think Hermione would risk getting *expelled* for using memory charms on her parents while being underage and under a trace.
the problem is more towards these "theories" being made without an afterthought.
Ron and Hermione had a row in H-B P, so naturally she wouldn't go with them. Tho I can't remember whether she left or stayed at Hogwarts for holidays.
I love all the content, I went to universal studios and got a tour of universal studios and when we came to diagon Ally, he asked where Harry got all his money and I remembered the video you put out about where Harry got all his money and I told him about sleekeasy, he said I was the the first person to ever get it, thanks for all the content ❤️
Did you go to the one in Cali?
@@all-caps3927 Orlando
The theory about hermione wiping parents’ memory earlier seems much more legit than the last one
Hermione is book-smart, but would she be street-smart enough at that age to survive on her own?
@@Shan_Dalamani she would. She developed street-smartness during third year, the same time she had some sort of rebellious tendencies (for hermione it is really rebellious to drop one of classes). Somehow she managed to use time turner.
I don’t say she is super street genius, but she had enough to think about her parents in advance AND find a way to stay at her friends’. Not too hard.
P.S. English isn’t my first language, so I BeG fOr FoRgIvNeSs if something is wrong
@@Blabla_bloblo Why should she wipe their memoriesout before her 7th year?? There is no reason. Just because Voldemort is back it doesn't mean that he wanna kill everybody's familiy who has something to do with Harry. I mean, at the time she wasn't even in the order and Voldemort had no reason to track her parents down.
At the time he knew where harry was (in Hogwarts), and the only reason Voldemort might be looking for Hermione's parents is because they might have information about Harry and Hermione and, most importantly, where they are.
@@Karol-ei1fc because! Voldemort is back, he tries to kill Harry in first 10 mins of his new life, Cedric is killed just because he was in the wrong place. The war is clearly coming. Voldemort isn’t known for his careful aiming to his ark remedy with avada, he destroys everything and everyone. The first war has shown that no one is safe, especially “good guys” and their loved ones, and hermione is muggleborne on top of being Harry’s best friend. Loooots of reasons to think in advance. Who knew, maybe it would take less time to start the war. And she took care.
It's always entertaining to listen to these theories. Some of them are quite fascinating. Please do the additional 5 about Hermione and I'd love to hear about the other characters as well.
Cool vid. Only thing I want to correct is that Hermione isn't a muggle, she's a muggle-born. Muggles are strictly non-magical folks.
Never been this early before, what in the name of Merlin happened?! Love the content as always HP Theory!
me too lol
I have a video suggestion. What are the most dangerous spells that could cause harm to the user?
Ron's "Eat slugs"
"goyle set the bloody place on fire!"
Specifically, Wands that can be casted but at a cost. Like a spell that could take a year off your life or a spell that will only work if you give up some of your blood
The Patronus if you are a particulary dark wizard. Shots out maggots that eat away at the caster
Horcrux creation, should be top of the list.
Avada Kedavra, may cause soul divide.
And situational ones, like Bombarda aimed too close
a neville video would be great, I reckon.
But if Hermione whiped her parents' memory earlier wouldn't the ministery be aware of it and would have send her a letter because being under age and using magic (against muggles)?
No because in the movie, I don't remember if stated in the book. Hermione was of age when she oblivated her parents.
@@kylemansur6853 but the theory is saying she did it around the time of ootp
@@suhayo3042 The way time turners work is that the user still ages when they repeat however many hours they've repeated. Hermione's constant use of it during her third year meant that she was actually older by more than a normal amount by the end of that year than she would have been if she hadn't been using it. So Hermione was actually 17 (and therefore of age) well before the normal time would have been, and therefore would not have been guilty of using underage magic.
She was of age in their 6th year, her birthday is in mid september.
True
I have a very common yet unique surname. My surname is spelled, "Jeffery." A lot of people around the world are named Jeffrey, Geoffrey, Jeffry, etc. Almost no one in has a surname of Jeffery. If I see it spelled this way, we are somehow related, even if I haven't met them.
Have you ever thought that you may be related to a Jeffrey also but your name was just misspelled along the way?
I think the Hector Granger thing was just another example of Slughorn's obsession with famous people.
I liked this! Would be fun to make it a series with five theories on each character.
I liked these! I haven’t heard any of them before, I skip these kinds of videos most of the time because I have already heard the theory’s before
video idea:
Why didnt fudge use the time turner to see whether voldemort was really back or not?
he was so scared of the possibility that he refused to consider it
fudge didnt believe he had returned
therefore itdidnt happen
therefore why investigate at all
The same reason they never use the Pensive or truth serum for anything: becuase then the plot wouldn't happen.
i always found 2 things odd in regards to hermione when reading the stories. I wouldn't say they are theories but in terms of the writing/story
1: that at such a young age, even if she was very academic, she was trusted with a time turner. I mean a muggle born with such a powerful magical tool that's normally hidden in the ministry of magic? it didn't make sense to me.
It would have made a lot more sense to have a teacher have it and bring her along to get to her classes and at the end dumbledor could have given her the turner and say something like "I'm sure a smart girl like you realizes how to use it. Two should be enough."
2: that she was basically so "this can't be real/a thing/ etc" especially in book 7.
I mean she was a muggle born raised on fairy tales and told that magics fake/pretend/etc and then suddenly learns that all sorts of stuff that was fake/pretend/etc turned out to be real and yet this one aspect of magic was to over the top? The fact that so much she was told about as being fake turned out to be real made it seem more weird that she was so against the possibility that other things thought of as fake, aka wizard fairy tales, CAN'T be real.
i mean she saw what cant be real as being rule already. why is that the exception?
if Hermoine is a muggle born witch but a witch just the same how does it make her children half - blood ? shouldn't they be pure blood as both parents were witches ? -- had either she or Ron married a muggle than those offspring would be "half - blood " one magical parent + one muggle = half blood children but two magical parents ( pure blood.1/2 blood or muggle born ) would have pure blood kids
Harry is considered a half-blood even if both his parents are magical I think there has to be 3 lines of magical parents before they are considered full blood
can the accio spell be used to kill someone like summoning a knife behind the person. would it find an unobstructed way towards you or force its way through the person. does spell mastery allow you to choose either.
What?
I think if there is an unobstructed way the object uses it. If the object used the straight way through everything Harry's firebolt would probably have been damaged when he summoned it from the dorm to the dragon arena. There is however also a spell which sends objects away. This one could be used.
I might be wrong but i do remember some scenes when wizards “summon” small items like books behind another person and that person “dodges” the items path or gets hit. Might be a wrong spell but accio is the spell that brings items towards the caster.
Me: Worst to best? how can theories be "worse" and "better"?
HPT: First theory: Hermione is Harry's sister.
Me: I see now.
Hermione is 10 months and 12 days older than Harry so that could be possible
Those theories are fascinating. Can you please make a part two.
Worst: Hermione is canonly black. It’s already been stated in the books she is white
Hermione's true parents( both magical) were killed by dark side while a baby . Then she took the place of a muggle baby killed accidentally by such act . Etc etc . Simple . She an her muggle parents never knew , an still doesn't .
2:35....the only secret child so far is the one that perished with Lilly when Voldemort killed her......thanks Rowling.
I have thought that Hermione could sent her parents away after the third task; however the Granger home was still Hermione's. After the war she brought her patents back from Australia. When she wasn't in school she was with them most of the time. Until she married Ron.
She is underage ? So she can't do any spells at home.
actually she was at 12 Grimould Place during Order of the Phoenix so that's why I hesitated on the theory instead of choosing option 2.
For Harry and Hermione to be brother and sister and be in the same year at Hogwarts, they would very likely have to be twins. I suppose they could be more than nine months apart and still be in the same class, but it seems unlikely. The Dursleys never mentioned a niece but why would they. The most damning refutation, why would a prosperous couple like the Potters have put her up for adoption?
James could've had an affair lol
Video idea for you to do:
What additional effects do spells have that are not seen in the movies? For instance, what else can the patronus charm do besides ward off dementors?
I like the idea of Hermione stealing the time turner because I can’t picture a character like Minerva giving a student such an unfair advantage over all the others when there are other ways of helping them
But the theory falls to the ground on the fact that Hermionie would be smart enough not to break dozens of laws by breaking into the ministerium of magic and thus risking her entire life and education just to be able to take a couple of more classes. And the time turner was not given to her to give her an advantage but because she was actually awarded best student of the year and highest average grades and wanted to take extra classes but needed more time to do so, but that only meant extra homework which as seen in the books stresses her out because its starting to become too much which increases the chances of getting a lower grade because you are stressed and starts to unfocus, also why would dumbledore on purpose help Hermionie break rules and laws that he also knew could cost her both her education her wand and possibly even a trip to Azkaban? Dumbledore liked to jest and prank, but no way he would risk an innocent students life just on a burglar job.
@@Vakaria-plays
Shhhhh
Let people enjoy things
But Professor McGonagall hands out schedules to the students, so she knows that Hermione has 2 classes at the same time.
Here’s another theory about Hermione. What if the Beauty and the Beast remake takes place in the Harry Potter universe and Belle is Hermione’s Squib ancestor? Think about it: Both are played by Emma Watson and both are strong heroines who are also bookworms.
*i like that one...would also be interesting if the world of Fables graphic novel (By Bill Willingham) also intersect with the wizarding world...the game by Tell Tale Games The Wolf among us was excellent...the play through videos on yt are well worth checking out*
I hate it!!
You can't take as argument that they are both played by Emma Watson! U must leave it out, bc the actor shouldn't influence the story! And both stories are based on books, and in the books Emma is so irrelevant like me.
And i hate also when ppl start to mix fantasy worlds with each other.
PS: Sorry for the little freakout
@@Karol-ei1fc It’s not just Emma Watson, both characters she plays are strong heroines who love books.
@@YellowBear-kx1ff Wow both love books and are heroines, I think you'll also find two heroes who love books, doesn't mean that they're the same person.
And how I said, U can't mix them,
J.K created the WW, not Disney. So You must always stay in one of them.
Awesome vid! I would love 5 more on Hermione.
Yeah the last theory is entirely plausible apart from the fact that at the start of the school McGonnagall had a meeting with Harry and Hermione (Harry because of the Dementor attack) but then Harry is asked to wait outside the office while McGonnagall talks to Hermione, you could probably explain the fact that she knew about the time turners being in there because she literally watched a death eater's head turn back into baby form over and over again, it probably would have also been in the Dailey Prophet , it's not the first time the Prophet reported things it wasn't meant to, after all, the Prophet isn't strictly part of the Ministry, they write what they want anyway
Thanks for such a great video. I hadn't heard any of those theories.
That was a great video! Please do more!
The Hermione homeless theory really only works as happening in the 5th book. She is supposed to spend Christmas skiing with her parents. She could easily have used going home to wipe their memories as adult wizards would be there collecting their children. Then she could have gone to Grimmauld Place where she eventually ends up. It would be longer than initially expected, but not much longer
Hermione being a secret child the Potters gave up for adoption, makes no sense. Her and Harry are the same age right? Ya, they could be twins, would be an argument. But you would be sayng, the Potters couldn’t handle two kids. Wizards and Witches are human right? They have to go through 9 months of pregnancy, right? Or do Witches have short pregnancies? Or can Witches shoot out babies, whenever they want?
"Her relationship with Harry was very sisterly and their relationship had something special but not romamtic"
Oh, You mean like me and my 3 female best friends who I consider to be mu sisters inspite of having no relation to their families what so ever?
I agree, that theory is the hight of weak.
I love your Harry Potter theories. They are thought provoking.
Thanks for yet another great video🤩⚡️
Thanks for the video
PLEASE do 5 more of these!!! Hermione is one of my favourite characters
#1 I have a simpler explanation: I could see Dumbledore or McGonagall give her a brief lecture about Time Turners, where they come from and how they work right before giving her one.
Other Theory: Hermione was imperiused by Dumbledore (Until before Half-Blood Prince). So In Philosopher Stone she leads Harry to the the stone like Dumbledore wanted (why that will be another theory). Also in following films she is a big help. Also how could she have known spells before Hogwarts as a muggle-born? Do they not get suprised by the letter like Harry.
I think the Time Turner is more likely her being given a scholarship(ish) thing for being an Unspeakable, given her study record and intelligence and Minerva being an insider/recruiter for them. I find that more understandable than Dumbledore giving her a reality breaker for studies. That is, if he did not know of Sirius' break out and innocence prior.
I would like to see more theory videos like this one on some other characters too!
No one:
Hermione: Oh no, I can't take 500 classes, only logical explanation is to sneak into the government building and yoink myself a nice clock thingy!
thank you for this. most entertaining. would love more theories on her & others...
Cool video!
I always took issue with her using obliviate on her parents, purely because that doesn't prevent them from being used against her to get to her. It made no sense.
Memory or not they could still take them and use them as leverage against her despite the fact they have no memory of her, because she herself remembers rather than them.
Could do more Hermione granger theory's I am a huge fan of your channel I am a big potterhead and would love to see some more thank you
I was hoping for a dramione theory hahahaha
Professor Mcgonagall wrote many letters to the ministry officials for granting Hermoine the Time turner and wrote specifically that she will use it only for educational purposes. She was also not the 1st to have it,atleast Barty crouch Jr.,Bill and Percy weasley also had it so it wasn't uncommon.
For the 2nd theory in the video. Hermione does say in the book a line similar to "Her parents said she could come" . Or something along those lines, I believe in the Order of the Phoenix. I mean, she could be lying but this slightly disproves the theory.
Very interesting indeed. Give me more please.
Ron hung out with Harry much more than Hermione did in the story and logically when not part of the story, but they were not lovers or twins.
You see children Long long ago in a land outside of your home, we used to have friends and we actually talked together and played indoor and outdoor games that didn't require wifi or a cell phone.
We had what they called "a life". and everyone had one.
So this part of the story begins in 1991, when 11 year old Harry first came to Hogwarts.
So Harry had 11 years of fishing, playing monopoly, shooting hoops and reading books before he went to Hogwarts.
By the time I was 11, I had many girls that were in the neighborhood or at school that we were fond of each other for a while as life is about feeling your way and working on your people skills.
We didn't sit around dreaming about drag queens or spend a lot of time pulling for Johnny or Amber.
Today is no different.
I've spent a few hours out and about today, but I do spend way too much time using the internet
This story starts out as a child's tale for children. But that's not what it's about at all as you've taken a very good child story and turned it into a political agenda.
Except Harry didn't. He had 10 years of physical and mental abuse and not being allowed adequate food, clothing, medical care, and wasn't treated with the slightest amount of respect. He was also denied every opportunity for fun (the only reason he went to the zoo was because Arabella Figg couldn't babysit that day).
They care about each other like family, so yes.
While I never had heard of number 2 actually likes it as that would explain how she was magical if the only way was through a regressive gene. So her father would have had to be related several generations back.
sound theory on her being a relative of a renown wizard
Were there any muggle born ministers of magic prior to Hermione? What are you thoughts?
There actually WAS a Muggle-born Minister for Magic before Hermione. His name was Nobby Leach.
The theory about Harry and Hermione being siblings doesn't seem plausible, especially when JK Rowling said she considered having Harry and Hermione end up together before she decided to have Harry with Ginny and Hermione with Ron. Regarding the time turner, Hermione did say that McGonagall gave her the time turner and wrote all kinds of letters swearing that Hermione wasn't the kind of person to misuse the time turner. Plus McGonagall was the person who handed out the schedules, surely she would have noticed Hermione having two classes at the same time. Regarding Hermione "wiping" her parents memory in advance, how would she have gotten away with underage magic use. Remember that the Ministry of Magic reacted to Harry doing just that (using magic underage). The theory is plausible because Hermione spent every summer (from Prisoner of Azkaban on) with the Weasleys. Surely Hermione's parents would have wanted to spend time with their daughter during the summer once the school year was done.
The one about the time turner can easily be explained away as she had to go to the ministry to apply for the use of a time turner cause I seriously doubt McGonagle or Dumbledore would have just told her how to steal it. If they would have stolen it they would have done it themselves
I would love to see one of Severus Snape or maybe dumbledore?
Ooh 😲😲😲 what an inavitve & magical video
Bravo, bravo indeed Sir!!
If a half blooded witch and wizard have a child, is the child also a half blood?
Harry went through muggle school as well ;D
I definitely don't agree with the time turner theory, McGonagall did know her schedule so she would have known that she was supposed to be in too many places at once. Besides I'm pretty sure that Percy would almost certainly have needed one as well due to how many subjects he took, and maybe other students too but they would have kept a close watch on them and probably had to be cleared with the ministry for each student that got one.
I totally go with the 4th Theory. I not only believe that for Hermione but for all Muggle-Born Witches and Wizards. Whether it was a few years ago or hundreds of thousands of years ago, these ppl must've had atleast one or two Pure-Blood Witch/Wizard in their Bloodline. And most Importantly Hermione is better paired with Harry than Ron. But still love Ron though. Actually more than Harry, Emma Watson's Hermione will be better paired with me. There's not a HP fan who hasnt had a crush on her.
Please do one of these on snape!
Hermione couldn't be the secret sister because there's less than nine months between their birthdays with Hermione being older
May you please do theories on ginny Weasley?
Like this movie! But I have a question. If hermione and dumbledore took the time turner does this mean that he also too it for Charlie and Percy as they also are said to have having as many owls as well as
My head canon is Harry and Hermione got together, the Ginny thing was always odd to me. Even Luna seemed like a better match than Ginny.
Hermione was the secret love child of Lilly and Snape.
Luckily these wonderful film adaptations came out when they did, otherwise current Hollywood naming / casting conventions would have replaced every instance of "Harry Potter" with "Hermione Granger" in the movie titles. Additional changes would be thus: Harry - an angry Goth - would simp for Aunt Petunia and have an angry, unrequited crush on Dudley. Ron would have a pronounced stutter, an 18-inch blue mohawk, be confined to a wheelchair and come from a large blended pureblood family. His parents, Mrs. and Mrs. Weasley own a combination BnB / Health food shoppe in Diagon Alley and for 50 galleons a week, they let Xenophilius Lovegood secretly sell Wizard-Hemp from a small back room. Hagrid is openly transitioning to Olympe Maxime. All of the House Elves are actually Squibs who identify as Furries. The basic premise: On Wednesday, 31 October 1981, after breaking into Lilly's home, Voldemort easily killed Lilly's Baby-Daddy, who had been cowering in the corner all day crying because Lilly had scolded him about not properly drying and storing her new spalted-Hornbeam Charcuterie Board. Lilly -- who had been showering - immediately leapt from the bathroom having only time to clad herself in a Quilted Flannel Invisibility Jacket and an old comfy pair of her late birth person's Doc Martens. Her wand was still absentmindedly stirring several ounces of pumpkin spice into a pitcher of iced-Vodka on the bathroom sink. The duo met at the threshold of Baby Harry’s nursery door. Her eyes locked with those of the Dark Lord and she saw that he was suddenly AFRAID. A grueling 45-minute combination wand-dual / epic martial arts battle ensued and using trickery, copious amounts of mansplaining and the occasional successful Levicorpus spell, Lord Voldemort managed to achieve a series of lucky shots with an enchanted SPAS-12 loaded with special 00 Dragon Heartstrings shells. He murdered Lilly Evans that night. He preceded through the nursery doorway and just as he reared up to his full height of 4-foot 8 and unleashed the killing curse upon baby Harry, two-year old Hermione Granger leapt in between them and using her binkie and two-newly formed buck teeth as pseudo-fulcrums, snapped-kicked the curse back into Lord Voldemort’s face, destroying his physical body immediately. Her secret shame was that she arrived too late to save Harry's strong, independent mother.
Well the movies did give a lot of Ron and Harry's things they did in books to Hermione so that was that
Technically, she should be at least a couple weeks older than her classmates since via the timeturner she lived through the duration of a class twice when taking two subjects at the same time. Over the course of a year this must’ve added up to at least a few weeks in pure time.
My personal theory on Muggle Born is they are in fact descended of witches and wizards. They're directly descended from squibs... in many ways she could have been related to Merlin or Rowena Ravenclaw due to her studious nature.
I also thought the Weasleys were the descendants of Godric Gryffindor because they are all sorted into Gryffindor.
Since there’s only a thousand students at a time attending Hogwarts, there might be only about 10,000 wizards in Britain tops, so if you go back a couple generations every wizard or witch are probably in some way related to each other.
I remember Iceland with 500,000 inhabitants having to introduce an app for icelanders to make sure they weren’t accidentaly dating their relatives. Imagine how much more of a probability that is with only 10k or so.
(2:44) Right?
Hermione's parents didnt even have a single line in the books.... not even in the scenes they were present.... why would jk spend much time describing them when more prominent characters that actually had lines didnt even get a description, like lavender brown
how can Harry and hermione be siblings unless James had an affair which I doubt he did. Harry is born in August and Hermione in September of the same year so its impossible
Harry's birthday is July 31st 1980 and Hermione's is September 19th 1979
Jk Rowling said Harry and Hermione should have ended up together YEARS after the books were done. At that point, her popularity was soaring, and she would have said ANYTHING/EVERYTHING to please her fans.
And she was basing that on her own marriage. She practically said her new husband was "Harry Potter."
Last of all, NONE of the books ever even HINT at Harry+ Hermione being romantically attracted to one another. But here I am, a grown man fussing over some children's book.
Can you please cover why did voldemort died when Harry won with an Expelliarmus?
Shouldn't it only take away voldemort's wand? How did he got killed in that most dramatic paper-burning-ash-rising way?
That ash burning way was only in the movie. In the book he fell just like any other man. I liked the book version of the war better than the movie.
He didn't die from Expelliarmus. He cast Avada Kedavra at Harry, which rebounded at him when the wand in Harry's hand overpowered the one he had. He was hit by both spells.
I would like to know what would have happened if Valdermort had used a tempal manipulation device to travel back in time and give his younger self information about what was to come.
Becuase Time Turners cannot change the past. Anything you try to do would have already happened becuase your future is now part of the past. Also becuase HP is fictional and that would mess up the story.
What happened to #12 Grimauld Place
As both Hermione and her parents are muggles, how did they know about and how were they able to get to Diagon Alley?
Because Professor McGonagall visited the family to tell them Hermione was a witch? The same way all muggleborns are told? Did you really think that the school would just leave them to figure it out by themselves?
@@Delete240 it was how they got to diagon alley I was curious about.
The biggest thing against them being brother and sister is their ages are only like 2 or 3 months apart that could never work
Hermione was born in September 1979. Harry was born in July 1980. It could work, assuming the mom got pregnant very soon after Hermione's birth.
There was no need to wipe her parents' memory since wizards are just incapable of finding an address and can't track down muggles.
Yeah they could've. When they took over the order, they got access to Hermiones records, including her family address. And not to mention, they probably had spies in the muggke government tracking down muggle borns
Theory three...
Education at muggle schools BEFORE reaching the age of eleven will not be good for knowing a lot about muggle subjects.
It's primary school level.
Only a very few exceptions , bright children, with very rich parents who can afford private payed lessons to their child will learn more during primary school time. Remember also....in the 1990-2000 years there was NO suitable internet for extra learning for smart kids available.
Also I suppose most witch children (at least halfbloods) will go to any primary school, learning writing, basic counting and so on....and those primary schools are muggle schools. It's not that Hogwarts students start with knowing nothing and not even able to write anything.
This third theory does not have my support....
Of coarse Hermione is smart enough to learn all muggle educations normally thaught during a year on a muggle school in only the few weeks holiday from Hogwarts....but than...that's not PRIOR to Hogwarts but DURING her Hogwarts time (first years when she still went most of the time to her parents during holidays)
Also the first one....Hermione is the same age as Harry, but not the same date of birth .
Making it near to impossible, even from witches, to be brother and sister.....only twins could be in the same year invited to Hogwarts.
Relating to Harry as full cousin however is not impossible but very unlikely because both...Lily AND James where witches. But a relation is not impossible because the parents from Lily were not magical. One of them could have a sister/brother whose child married with the Granger father from Hermione. (And Petunia is the only sister from Lily herself....)
Hermione is a year older than Harry but ended up in his year because she had to wait nearly a whole year after her 11th birthday. She used the time to finish her last year of Muggle school and pre-study as much as she could of her first-year magical curriculum (not to mention her favorite book, Hogwarts: A History).
Don’t believe the second one about wiping her parent’s memory before book 7. Simply the Trace would have found her being muggle born. With no adult wizards in the house she would have been expelled and wand snapped.
What’s this ‘muggleborn’ you speak of?? I only know Purebloods, Halfbloods and MUDbloods
Hermione could not have modified her parents memory earlier, because she had thw trace on her. And her inteligence and acedemic acumen are from her parents qhoare both soctors o f dentistry. So she was probably pushed quite hard as a young child.