The use case of asking it questions is completely overshadowed by the fact that you need to look up every answer yourself to verify that it wasn’t hallucinated
I'm seeing more and more people answering questions in forums with AI crap and it's so frustrating. "Well, I asked [insert AI name here] and it said this was the correct answer." Ok? And? wheres the source? At least if I google something I can see multiple answers. Or look it up on Wikipedia and it will give me the direct sources for everything. I feel like I'm turning into a Ludite with every passing moment that AI is becoming more popular.
Basic UI/UX fail: You ask it a question, and the rabbit just sits there bouncing in the silence as if it hasn't heard you. It would be simple to change the animation to show that it's heard and is working on it, which would make that awkward pause feel so much shorter.
Teenage Engineering? Scam company? They've been putting out great synthesizers for years now. Definitely not **just** a scam company even if this product isnt great.
I just hope these products lead to us being less disconnected as a society. I like the idea of having a pocket companion that does everything for you, but only if it actually works.
THANK YOU for calling out the insanely low wheel sensitivity. I thought I was going insane that nobody else was complaining about it. The UI on this is even worse than the Humane Ai Pin and that’s truly an accomplishment.
Requiring users to navigate with a cumbersome scroll wheel, despite the presence of a touchscreen, seems like a deliberate move to degrade the user experience.
@Najeeb10003My advice is, don't focus on subscribers or a fancy camera, focus on content. I saw you only had on video. If you aren't making content people like now, a new camera isn't going to help make it better. You don't want it to become a wasted investment. I admire the enthusiasm, but you should try working with what you have instead of believing you "need" something to get big. I've felt the same thing myself, but it isnt really whats stopping you. It's a tough world in content creation either way. Find a niche and do with what you can.
That’s the thing, they built an AI app first, and a physical device second. They should have built a physical device first, and AI second. If they had built a fast, snappy, intuitive physical device, it would be much easier to like. You have to enjoy using something or you’re just going to be annoyed constantly.
and it makes the people who said „but he destroyed the company with that review how could he be so honest >:(„ look even dumber just a scammer with a scam product getting owned by a actual honest review thank god people like he and coffeezilla exist
Ah yes "they". I promise "they" have you exactly were they want already. So i wouldn't worry about shitty products trying to blind you. I promise you are are already blind.
It technically is it’s bringing attention to the product wether it’s a good or bad review at the end of the day people are going to make their own choices on if they should buy it
For kicks, I took a zoomed-in picture of the coffee arabica plant (which wasn't great, because it was a photo of an LED screen showing an image of an LED screen showing an image), and then used Google Lens. It CORRECTLY identified the plant in less time than the AI had to be wrong.
It clearly had an issue working out scale. A monstera kinda looks like that but is much bigger. The fruit is the size of a cob of corn, and delicious btw
For people complaining about Marques' lack of love for the Rabbit R1, I'll say this... it is a heck of a lot easier, and more popular, to give a glowing review than to be honest and say that a product sucks. Kudos to MKHBD for calling a spade a spade.
why the hell would or should he have love for quarter-baked cheap useless toy product like rabbit? Make good product - get good review. It's earned not given.
I wish MKBHD was consistent though. It's no secret that staying in the good grace of Apple requires unquestionable loyalty, but I think Marques is mature enough to spread his wings and start being sincere with everything he analyzes. It's good that he's doing these pretty deep videos on such shallow tech, the production quality is excellent, as is the presentation. But he'll happily turn around and praise Apple Wheels or something equally useless just because he doesn't want to bite the hand that fed him :/
An AI that replies to every question with things found in transcripts of the Joe Rogan show will really let people embrace that 'dipshit roomate' relationship. THAT'S a product with a PURPOSE
The start of that made me go "Oh, like what modern-day gaming is like?" Because, yeah, make the game half-way, release it, fix things up along the way, hope you fixed it to where it's what you said it'd be. Which is a pretty smart(?) way to get reviewers off your back, because you can always say "We're not done :)" if they criticize something.
i can answer that: what we're doing is making a bunch of useless crap because there's an endless pile of cash being invested by private equity, and you don't need to actually make anything good to get the money from investors you just have to keep making more AI crap to drive the hype. Hype = a bazillion dollars from investors. The investment money will never go away because it's the only way to outpace inflation right now. But the investment money isn't driving any real sales. I believe this is called, a BUBBLE.
The absolutely wild thing is that it's now been revealed that Rabbit is literally just an app running on a modified version of Android. The device they're selling is just an Android device with a single app installed and permanently running. So why didn't they just make an app for Android phones instead? 🙄
My guess is that that's their way to fund it. People are less accepting of an app being $200 rather than a physical device that they hold, and they don't wanna make it a subscription service or sell data(props on them for making it a one-time purchase). You also get the novelty of having a device just for a task. We could play all our games on phones, but we prefer other portable devices even if your phone is the strongest and you have a controller grip. It being just for gaming makes us find it more novel.
Wrong because mp3 players can actually be useful, phones don't have an aux anymore, and even the ones that do, don't have enough power or great audio quality. These AI boxes are useless.
No, MP3 players to their job well. It's limited but if that's what are you calling for, it's great. These Ai assistants without all the context are not helping. And if you need Internet anyway, why should I not just pick my phone anyway?
Well, Siri was launched in 2011, Alexa in 2014 and Google Assistant came out in 2016 so yeah, if this came out in 2005 it would've disrupted the whole tech industry. 😂 Seriously though, if this came out in like 2012, 2013 I'm pretty sure it would've done a lot better than coming out now.
@@TheTruthKiwi Nah such low level gimmick like Rabbit-R1 isn't that groundbreaking at all. People with low braincell would already see its limitation while AR/VR has only reached its 1% potential which is the real future techs
So many of these AI things feel like dealing with a dimwitted project teammate. They're assigned to do things, and sometimes they do get their job done well enough, but they still get stuff wrong so frequently that you always have to check and correct their work, to the point that it's ultimately just faster and less frustrating to do it all yourself.
@@Gui-sr2jw in what way are they not using them right? For AI to be functional and useful, it needs to get things right with just a single prompt and admit when it doesn’t know. You sound like one of those people who say that you just need to guide the AI with prompts and “prime it”, which is a workaround at best. An AI should not need led to an answer, it should be able to answer correctly right away, the same as if you asked a human expert the question. AI at this stage is still barely functional for most things and anyone that blindly trusts AI is a fool. Their analogy was spot on, AI is like an incompetent team member, you always have to check their work which is often incorrect and often end up having to do it yourself.
Oh wow! A pocket rectangle that I can press a button on to ask questions to a virtual assistant. I certainly don’t already have one of those that I carry around everywhere all the time 🙃
The computer game industry has been perfecting this for decades. When I was doing my masters a decade ago, I told my professor how crazy things the gaming industry got away with in terms of early access and launching products with missing core features. It turns out, if you let one industry get away with it often enough, other industries start to take notice.
A decade ago, sure. But two decades? That seems to be pushing it to me. That's "Steam is that silly thing Valve forces us to install to play Half- Life 2" time frame. Third party games didn't even exist on it yet, according to Wikipedia. Then again, things did move pretty quickly so I guess it might be close enough that rounding up isn't a big deal. Or am I misremembering 2004?
@@mascot4950 You are right. The infamous Bethesda horse armor happened in 2006. I think it's somewhere between 10 and 20 years that things went off the rails for us consumers.
@stevens9625 Star Wars X Wing sold 'expansions' that ADDED STORY to it. That was the 90's. Because I guess a full story can't be sold in the base game lol
@@dizzydyzy That's.. what expansions are supposed to be. An addition that expands on the original game in meaningful ways, including story. Or are you saying the first game was artificially made into an incomprehensible mess, only to "force" people to buy expansions to make sense of it all? I'd need some evidence to support that claim.
Studying game design, and I’m really glad my professors are actively trying to encourage proper work (and consumer) ethics with gaming because it’s been getting absurd for both consumers and developers with how much this style of “release, and then develop” is becoming the norm
This thing is borderline a scam, and that was obvious from its dazzlingly stylised but completely opaque pre-sale advertising. It’s a shittier more annoying version of a phone, and teenage engineering should be ashamed for being involved with it. If FyreFest guy was in tech, this is exactly the bs he’d sell.
Oh boy, here we go Finished watching: 200$ for a square box that will be wrong, without any significant features and that looks like a toy. In other words, useless.
The fact that they put a model ("R1") means that they probably have every intention making a number two... which is ironic, considering a number two is exactly what they made
You know what these AI companies should do, a Roomba, people already love their Roombas, Roombas just cleaning around and answering random questions, maybe even tell a bad joke once or twice, give it, it's own animated googly eyes, more dramatic dialogues when it's about to fall down
Read that in a novel. Yes, a novel. The subject in question was an outdated cleaning robot, then MC (who transmigrated and becomes a genius because he was from the interstellar age) updated it to be completely intelligent and independent in the true sense of an AI. We're born to early for these tech advances.
Awesome idea, add some Star Wars droid beeps and let it spew random facts on topics you've searched before when it senses a human and I would totally be on board!
Dude, you are the most optimistic person of all time. This should have been 100% dunked on. It's garbage vaper ware that every current cell phone can do. You need to warn you viewers of scams, and this is clearly one
@@felesnocis it isn't? All i'm saying is a company tends to get the benefit of the doubt if they have previously released successful products, this is a company with a legit reputation that is putting their name on the line for this product. TE isn't just some random Kickstarter startup with the intention to scam people. It's a firm whose products have been used by musicians ranging from Taylor Swift to Thom Yorke and Tame Impala. Although, to be fair, I think Teenage Engineering might just have been contracted for the physical design, and maybe they are not the actual product owners.
@@felesnocis the company that did the hardware for the rabbit is called teenage engineering, they are a legit company who just got commissioned to do the hardware for this ai scam. they have a lot of music related products like synthesizers. Teenage engineering is seperate from the rabbit company, who made everything else and are the shady ones.
Banger of a title. despite recent "controversy", please don't stop making honest, on point and clear reviews. It's invaluable for people to navigate a space filled with tons of mediocre products, a few downright bad ones and a few exceptional ones. You're among my top 3 go-to people when I need to decide my next smartphone or other tech products🙏
There is an AI device I would actually buy lol. You point it at an animal or record a bird call and it quickly and accurately identifies it and tells you ecological info about the spcies. As a biologist I would be all over that but I doubt the tech is there and I doubt the general public would want it
@@oo7799 i love cornell's merlin bird id app for this reason. It can identify birds by image or by sound, and its pretty damn accurate. I was surprised by how good the sound results were, I use it all the time when hiking/birdwatching now :) Only issue is that it doesn't display information about the bird iirc, but you could easily cook something up with Cornell's BirdNET API for sound, maybe something like inaturalist for photos, and some basic database responses with Cornell's ebird (assuming that someone hasn't created something similar already, which i'm sure they have).
Because Ios 18 will bring LLMs and LAMs to the iPhone UI and Google and Samsung are already implementing LLMs into their phones UI, they will surpass the rabbit instantly (app or not). This is just a cashgrab from the UI enthusiasts
Definitely feels like, "Hi. Would you like to be our beta tester for $200 and a lot of device babysitting?" It's like a Kickstarter where you get this skeleton of a thing upfront, and then if they sell enough skeletons to fund their R&D, you _might_ get what you paid for at some ill-defined future point.
Yeah, and if it ever gets to the point where it's actually good, they'll likely release a new version that is much better than yours. So you'll have to spend more money to get something that you've spent money to get years ago.
Not quite. We still have brains of our own, and although I agree with him, I felt he was not harsh enough in dispensing with such nonsensical devices such as the R1 and Pin. There's nothing in them that the recent OpenAI app and new model (GPT-4o) can't do and then some!
Google is in a great position to create such a product! All it needs to do is combine: -Lens -Assistant -Gemini -Put in some good speakers -And their camera knowledge -Package it into some metal and glass sandwich -Call it maybe a …pixel phone
I would die to have something like this as a kid. And since most kids shouldn't have a smartphone until 13 or something it might have a use case as a cool gadget for kids.
In this case, AI was correct, and the label on the plant was wrong! Coffea arabica is a coffee plant. Monstera deliciosa was the one he showed in the room.
Maybe it would be better if the R1 said, "I THINK it's a ... ", to convey that the answers it gives COULD be wrong; or offer a quantitative value to its answers, such as, 'It's 85% likely to be a.... and 15% likely to be ....'
They are developing products in reverse for two reason: 1. Anticipation of the first mover advantage 2. Agile Software Development principles being applied to paid products which are not services (phones, cars, video games). Once you realize that companies value being first over being the best then everything becomes clear.
i don’t quite agree agile is to blame here (well, not directly, but certainly not in any way that it doesn’t already affect services and so on). don’t forget that agile, specifically kanban, was created by toyota to make car production more efficient, it was only adopted by software developers much later down the line
You forgot the main reason: people keep buying them. The "consumer" mentality is so rampant that people care more about getting the latest and greatest thing rather than a finished product.
No Reason one: make money from gullible people that also buy apple products or something thats kinda pretty much it. your phone has better hardware and access to better ai's, there's no logical explanation for getting one of these, unless you're a apple buyer and you're used to buying inferior products for more money, social status? trend? yes
Hey, it's like a smartphone but with a worse processor, screen and battery, and it has no phone and doesn't work but apart from that it's great so lay off!
It's already an app, it's called ChatGPT. Really annoys me to see people literally making a little box where all it does is use ChatGPT. No thanks, at least if that shit ran locally it'd have some value. There's literally no situation where you would use this piece of shit device.
“Instead of just building an app, let’s build a box that you need another SIM card to use, with a nonfunctional touch screen, and 4 hours of battery life. Then let’s put the app in that box. People will love this.”
What I want from an Assistant: - look things up for me (don’t make up answers!!) - schedule events and alarms for me - work as a timer - hook in to reverse image search or something - interact with other subservices (email, grocery list, etc) The AI part should just be for optimizing queries for looking things up IMO.
After watching Coffeezilla's newest video on The Rabbit, All the people who went at Marques Brownlee's review of This product. I would like to know their Opinion now. Are people just going to let them slide? They need to keep that same energy.
@@zoa9720 well yeah he literally becoming a corporation not a big youtube the bigger you are on yt the more corpo you need to be but that doesn't mean you should be too much of a corpo because hey last times someone try that their company stock when downhill
1:15 I asked (or rather, played back Marques asking) the same moon question to Siri on a 2014 iPad and it answered (correctly) in under 3 seconds, way faster than the 2024 Rabbit 🤷🏻♂
My iPhone 5C from 2013 on 12MBs WiFi was faster than the rabbit. Let me put a little more perspective to it. A phone that is 11 years old. With a 12 year old chip. On WiFi that has 2011 speeds was faster than a new product
Well yeah, search engines are tried and tested algorithms. AI inference takes an absurd amount of compute time, and its not even accurate because its not searching anything. These are advanced text predictors that burn electricity. As soon as the industry understand their nature the grifting will die down. AI has its place and can be amazing, but for "facts" its less than worthless. That's what search engines are for.
@@CarolinaCycloneJames The phone has nothing to do with Siri. It's all processed by the same servers whether it's an iPhone 5 or 15. Siri also has a much smaller data index to search.
I’ve been in the Healthcare industry for a decade. Companies do this ALL the time. Sales departments sell products that aren’t even in the MVP phase yet. Sell, and then build.
Well, sales teams have ALWAYS promised more than the products can do. Most sales people are just stereotypical "used car salesman" at heart, at least sometimes.
i worked in healthcare as a software developer and the things i learned terrified me. the healthcare industry is more than happy to risk patient health to cut corners. i’ll never work in that industry again.
This is exactly how the gaming industry has been operating for years. Delivering a product that you pay for then after a year or two, giving half the product and the rest behind a paywall. To think I liked this idea.
Humane AI Pin and Rabbit R1 feel like two varients of a gadget that existed 5-10 years before the first smartphone and later became obsolete when ios and android developed apps to do their thing. I can almost see them existing in that alternate history, in the past. Almost, because of the abysmal battery life. And since mobile phones spoiled us into always keeping devices on, I can imagine a daily user of one of these things using them back in the day. They'd just whip this thing out, switch it on, use it, and immediately switch it off after use. The switching on and off functions have to be quick like a digital camera or a laser measure. The fact that the infrastructure made to support mobile phones are what powering these things is really not helping my imagination.
It's basically trying to be a "Personal Electronic Terminal" (PET) from the Mega Man: Battle Network games. "Personal AI assistant to do everything from send emails to change the thermostat" was pretty much the central conceit of the game's setting... plus a healthy does of Internet of Things, where one's refrigerator is connected to the internet for no adequately explained reason. Which, admittedly, seemed a lot less realistic in the 2000s before refrigerators started being connected to the internet for inadequately explained reasons.
Saaame... At first when he was describing the controls I was thinking "I guess they didn't implement touch to save on costs or something" but then no, they just chose not to use an entire mode of input
well the answer is pretty simple, if the touch screen was more obvious investors would compare it to a phone, then they probably would less willing to invest because a phone isn't new but this AI device with a scroll wheel well that's "new". Both this and humane were devices that were not made to be good products but rather just products made to trap investors into giving a mountain of cash.
That's Teenage Engineering. They're notorious for "reinventing" things. Look up their "Field Desk." It's a $1,600 desk made out of aluminum and plywood. They have a thoroughly established reputation in the music production community for selling things that cost 10x what their competitors charge.
It's an AI toy for children aimed at parents with money to burn. They can use it to go around and learn about things. They won't get addicted to games or social media with it, or be exposed to adult content. The design language of the product looks like a toy, I don't see why people are comparing it to a phone.
@@gramfero well, one successfully got a cult following, despite service and the quality of their product. The other is trying. Let’s see if they are successful.
Bro you’re explaining the exact reason why I sometimes hate working for tech. Seriously it’s that age old waterfall vs agile approach. And now companies want to keep releasing “mvps” when in reality it’s just them delivering bullsh*t as a money grab.
@@unlimitedpancakes I don't know, I feel like even when I was a teenager I could have designed a better product than this given the resources, and I definitely know that I could have called this out as bullshit and a scam. Fools and scammers come from all age categories.
Looking at the folded up z flip on your desk, this is EXACTLY what this reminds me of. Someone could achieve quite literally the exact same functionality but better if they just made it an app for the cover screen of the z flip, having the onboard processor, great camera and proper battery life.
These guys want to make the maximum profit of this Tool (I am not calling it AI because AI does not exist). If you make an app of it, you cannot charge the amount of money they charge for this.
I could see Samsung making Bixby able to do a lot of the tasks Rabbit can do. Leave the Z Flip closed, press a button and ask Bixby to do stuff. Many Android apps support accessibility features, which would enable Bixby to execute "macros".
The fundamental problem with all of these "AI in a box" products is that the AI isn't actually in the box. They're pocket sized devices that record audio and/or pictures, send that to a server, and tell you what the server said. You know what else is a pocket size device that can record audio/video and communicate with a server? Your phone. They're devices the size of a phone, which cost as much as a phone, and require a cell plan like your phone and the only thing they do is talk to talk to a slightly more advanced chat bot than the one your phone already uses. It's not even a straight upgrade to things like Google Assistant and Siri, because Google Assistant and Siri can consistently do math correctly and dont hallucinate
It's an AI toy for children aimed at parents with money to burn. They can use it to go around and learn about things. They won't get addicted to games or social media with it, or be exposed to adult content. The design language of the product looks like a toy, I don't see why people are comparing it to a phone.
@@PomuLeafEverydayIt has the design language of a toy because that's trendy right now, but it was developed and marketed as a serious AI assistant that could do things like make transactions and communicate with others on your behalf. The original CES demo, which lead to them selling out the preorder editions, was all about how it can make purchases and book things like travel all on its own.
I completely respect what Marques is doing. All of these companies are just using AI to pump out crap tech. Call 'em out and tell it the way it is! That's why we respect you so much.
These startup companies seem to clearly be hoping that a clueless Zuck or Musk or other mega-cap CEO desperate to 'innovate' (because they can't) will buy them for massive amounts of money...without asking the basic business 'But, why?' question.
And what is he doing?! If it's not a product made by Apple or Tesla he's not going to slobber all over their knob and say that it's the best product ever and what credentials does he have other than just being a UA-cam reviewer?! Does he have any college education to back up any of his reviews or claims or anything like that? No he doesn't
@@ericluis2710are you saying that he didn’t go to college (Stevens Institute of Technology)? Or that his degree (Business and Information Technology) can’t possibly be a foundation for tech reviewing?
I am old so I have a story… I remember when PC’s needed to have a ROM (read only memory) chip shipped to you to remediate a defect in its BIOS (Basic I/O System). It happened but was really rare and BIOS code was well written and solid because it was expensive to fix. Then in the 1990’s, the ability to flash BIOS updates was released. I immediately predicted the tendency of manufacturers to increasingly release poorer code because it “can be fixed later”. And we’ve been living with that mentality and its trend towards increasingly poorer product code ever since. *It can be fixed later!*
This kind of thinking has permeated every aspect of modern life. Most hardware undergoes planned obsolescence. Video games do this so often that gamers call this the "Day One Patch" syndrome. Don't get me started on smartphones.
Thats just not true, code just got way more complex it's not at all worse quality. Code in the 80s-00s were literally killing people in medical equipment and etc and the code was relatively simple compared to the billions of lines in large programs now
Unforseen consequence of this: Ads could start including UI elements from other pieces to trick the AI into clicking their links and they could possibly not have the intelligence to avoid that in a LAM
Actually that might be genius. If you run the crawler with ads then it could potentially learn what to avoid. Running it with an ad blocker so it never learns what to avoid could backfire badly the moment an ad slips through the net.
The big question that none of these "AI assistant" product answer is "why should I buy this, when I own a smartphone?" Both this and the AI pin, are just things that do some of what my smart phone does and does that stuff poorly.
Assuming it can be updated it may be what it wants to be eventually.... but something tells me when/if they finally get where they want to be, they will release an h2 model you need to buy to utilize it all.
t's an AI toy for children. They can use it to go around and learn about things. They won't get addicted to games or social media with it, or be exposed to adult content. The design language of the product looks like a toy, I don't see why people are comparing it to a phone.
@@PomuLeafEveryday"the design language looks like a toy" that's just what teenage engineering designs look like. Usually design like this would be called "industrial", "sleak" and "modern" not "a toy"
@@sinom Then just market it for children. Problem solved. It would do really well as a kids educational toy. Already reminds me of how they use a Pokédex in the Pokémon anime.
the easiest way to give this product an audience, RIGHT NOW, would just be to make the rabbit like a pet, you can feed it, you can play games with it, but its also incredibly smart.
True but it would also turn it into a toy. and the company seems to not want that. They want it to be a personal assistant that is supposed to make your life easier.
The modern Tech market just feels like it forces every consumer to become an investor with all of the risk and non of the reward. You buy a product now and it's just as much of a gamble as buying stock.
Someone took the APK and put it on an android, programmed volume up as the button, and the little rabbit was able to answer questions as if it were in the R1 hardware and was able to connect to the RabbitOS servers just fine.
It really does make you wonder why they don't just have these things be a phone app or android distro to begin with. Because at least then if it doesn't work great on launch, at least you get the rest of the phone.
@@RAFMnBgaming Because it being an app wouldn't get millions in funding or hundreds of media articles, that's the only reason these things are not just an app
Yeah crazy that they only had 4 ready to go and they still think let’s release this and see who wants to pay 200$ for 4 free phone apps and Siri. 😅 if you release it with 100 apps then I might believe you can actually reach 800 😂
@@MrPisster lol, are you from the PR team? Is this how you justify paying hard earned money to a device that is useless at the moment but will be useful in the future but its not guaranteed? Admit it. This is a quick cash grab scam. I almost had a brain aneurism while reading the "$200 ticket to a show I want to watch" part.
@@MrPisster They even turned off the comments for all of their videos. Do you think they'll deliver the promise if they're doing stuff like that from the very beginning?
AI's not going anywhere soon, and it's definitely going to change our lives in very real ways. But right now, we are definitely in the hype part of the cycle, where there are a bunch of products promising to change our lives when they're not even capable of doing what they claim to do well.
At least this Rabbit product seems to reflect its price better than the AI Pin does. Having said that, it doesnt change the failure of the product anyways.
It's what happens when dumb investors that don't know anything hear a new buzzword to jump onto, you can empty their pockets by just saying "yes yes ai sir yes sir its ai" then producing a bare minimum product
$200 is outrageous. I just got a Samsung Tab A9+ (a twelve incher) for $220 and its absolutely brilliant. It can do everything a phone can, on a huge vibrant screen, and i can download any and all AI apps ever developed for android (guaranteed more features than the R1 has), and i can play games on it, watch netflix, message friends, fly my drone with it as the display, and livestream. And if i want to use more sophisticated AI tools, i can run Parsec to remotely control my home desktop PC (and its local AI models, for image generation or text prompting). And yes, "large action models" can exist locally on your own pc with very very little Pyton knowlede (two hours of tutorials and you can set up your own environment with multiple AI agents collaborating to solve tasks). I can even, in this way, use my tablet to remotely edit videos in Davinci Resolve. Oh but i need an internet connection to do that? Yes, and the R1 needs a connection to the cloud as well.. Tell me again why i'd pay $200 for an R1 Rabbit? Because it fits in my pocket? My phone does.
The lame thing is you can't just toss $200 bucks at this to have a "what were they thinking" item to add to your retro tech collection, as once all the online services are dead it's just an orange box that doesn't do anything.
Someone got Doom to run on it, so there that. It’s literally just a cheap Android device made out of bargain-bin parts so technically you could do anything you want with it if you jailbroke it, I guess.
@@theblah12 doom has run on an actual potato honestly not that impressive. i dunno why teenage engineering worked on this, they're much too good for this type of work
Reminder that TE had a really cool little music workstation for around $850, took it off the market, put it back up for like $1200, then took it off AGAIN, then re-relisted it AGAIN for over $2000. Same exact unit with very few updated features and the same 'intentional limitations' as the original unit.
Looks like a school project for an electronics or embedded devices class, like they added a scroll wheel because the rubric required wiring multiple components together.
I'd say this "releasing unfinished products" is just an extension of Agile Software Development model where, instead of building the whole car from scratch, you build the scooter, then the wagon, etc. The problem is defining the MVP (minimum viable product). In the car scenario, you can't sell the scooter and tell consumers it'll be a car next year.
I had the same thought. Personally, I'm sick of people trying to make everything agile. It's not a one-size-fits-all model, and I've seen it fail several times when people try to force agile.
The problem is that MVP and the Agile Software Development model is best suited for development teams working on a software product for a specific client, IMO. You make a minimal viable product, to your client and you get immidiate feedback that you can then use for the next sprint, doing this for a product that you are selling to the public as a complete product then using the public as a product owner for feedback is not how it's supposed to be used.
I’m a long-time product agilist, and skateboards should not be sold to customers as some sort of larval stage of a scooter, bicycle, motorcycle, or car. If you do that, you lose the entire benefit of shipping a skateboard and learning about the skateboard’s minimal use case. You do not want customers who will judge a skateboard or scooter according to how well it does a fractional implementation of a car.
The problem is the venture capitalists who invested millions into this before things like ChatGPT were mainstream. They realized that google and apple have way better AI assistants coming out this year which would make this piece of crap, and the humane AI pin completely obsolete, so it's a mad dash to get it to market to get as much as their original investment back as possible. The executives at Rabbit and Humane all know their products are dogshit, but can't say anything or they'll be sued. All of the engineers are probably under contract to finish the product as well so can't back out easily until it's launched. Thus you have a device that shouldn't exist, and everyone knows it sucks, but it gets launched anyways.
There is already an app for it, called ChatGPT. Allows voice input, image input, hands free conversation style voice input, file input and of course regular text.
As a hobbyist hardware guy and actual professional software guy, this feels like a side-project made with common off the shelf part and mostly open-source software. It's not a dunk on it, it's a device made with love and care, but it's a side project that hint at what could be done, rather than a serious statement.
Those concepts should be an app on your phone costing $5.99 a month. But they get greedy and figure: let's build a stand alone device and get some big $$$. Ain't gonna happen of course. At least they should start with an app and maybe in the long run they could go for a device even though imho it'd still be a very hard (if not impossible) sale.
I kinda like the concept, I would put this in my pocket and be my assistant at work, reduce my mistakes...but for the general public it really doesn't make much sense...if you do something like than I would recommend something niche for work
I don’t understand what they’re trying to accomplish. We already have phones that can do all that in seconds.
I'm sure we'll get even more AI trickery after WWDC or IO
It’s called: grifting on tech bros who want the most cutting edge tech for clout (Even if it’s useless).
Scam the fossils, NPCs and alogrithim at wall street. They will give you free money if you say AI
@@tokyowwww ok shill
Just make as much money as possible with investors/stocks and run. That’s the only plan.
The use case of asking it questions is completely overshadowed by the fact that you need to look up every answer yourself to verify that it wasn’t hallucinated
It's almost like LLMs aren't useful for looking up facts
these products would work if smartphones didn't already exist.
Welcome to AI lmao
this part.
Smart phones are op
I'm seeing more and more people answering questions in forums with AI crap and it's so frustrating. "Well, I asked [insert AI name here] and it said this was the correct answer." Ok? And? wheres the source? At least if I google something I can see multiple answers. Or look it up on Wikipedia and it will give me the direct sources for everything. I feel like I'm turning into a Ludite with every passing moment that AI is becoming more popular.
Basic UI/UX fail: You ask it a question, and the rabbit just sits there bouncing in the silence as if it hasn't heard you. It would be simple to change the animation to show that it's heard and is working on it, which would make that awkward pause feel so much shorter.
They literally have a character that could reflect the action the device is doing but they just don't.
Plus typing out the answer in really small size text because there is no room left because the bouncing rabbit takes up most of the screen? Wtf?
I am wrapping around my head that you have to use both hands to increase/decrease your brightness.
I think it was designed by an AI.
The animation changes when it is "hearing" you.
This is a scam company trying to ride the AI hype train. They did the same thing with NFTs. Please don't buy it.
Thanks for the heads up.
Teenage Engineering? Scam company? They've been putting out great synthesizers for years now. Definitely not **just** a scam company even if this product isnt great.
EXACTLY, COMPLETELY USELESS. A bunch of useless FAKE AI devices that solves ZERO problem
Coffezilla
@@ilyamethot3005 they only got commissioned to design the body of the device. Nothing besides the external shell.
Marques is in his "calling out shitty tech" Era and I'm here for it.
Marques haha 😂
facts man I agree
Real shit!!!!
Marques should make this into a series 😂
I think we're just in a release of shitty tech era
These AI boxes feel like a product people would use in an alternate universe where smart phones are still being developed
Fascinating
And yet, what if that world exists a long way ahead
I like open-mind thinking as a rule. But will it be VR/AR sunglasses etc, or …
the alternative universe where AI boomed before iPhone so we end up with Nokia 5310 with Siri
Exactly my thought. These devices would be cool 15 years ago
I just hope these products lead to us being less disconnected as a society. I like the idea of having a pocket companion that does everything for you, but only if it actually works.
It would be on Star Trek in the 1960s.
THANK YOU for calling out the insanely low wheel sensitivity. I thought I was going insane that nobody else was complaining about it. The UI on this is even worse than the Humane Ai Pin and that’s truly an accomplishment.
Dave2D already complained about it that stated that the wheel is completely useless when you already have a touch screen on it.
@Najeeb10003downvoted
Requiring users to navigate with a cumbersome scroll wheel, despite the presence of a touchscreen, seems like a deliberate move to degrade the user experience.
@Najeeb10003My advice is, don't focus on subscribers or a fancy camera, focus on content.
I saw you only had on video. If you aren't making content people like now, a new camera isn't going to help make it better. You don't want it to become a wasted investment. I admire the enthusiasm, but you should try working with what you have instead of believing you "need" something to get big. I've felt the same thing myself, but it isnt really whats stopping you. It's a tough world in content creation either way. Find a niche and do with what you can.
That’s the thing, they built an AI app first, and a physical device second. They should have built a physical device first, and AI second. If they had built a fast, snappy, intuitive physical device, it would be much easier to like. You have to enjoy using something or you’re just going to be annoyed constantly.
Coffeezilla dropped the nail in the coffin on this one
yeah this guy is so gullible who believes in tesla's self-driving at this point
@@numberonedad what
and it makes the people who said „but he destroyed the company with that review how could he be so honest >:(„
look even dumber
just a scammer with a scam product getting owned by a actual honest review
thank god people like he and coffeezilla exist
@@numberonedad what are you even talking about
Nah, it was a stillbirth. Very sad.
Don’t let unfinished/broken products become the new normal. That’s what they want. Keep doing these.
This, million times agree!
Ah yes "they". I promise "they" have you exactly were they want already. So i wouldn't worry about shitty products trying to blind you. I promise you are are already blind.
nobody would have bought it anyways
@@elwa_chin8604 it’s not the product itself, it’s the bar they’re trying to set so low that matters.
@@elwa_chin8604You underestimate consumerism.
Reviews are NOT advertisements. Thanks for being genuine and honest.
you crazzy if you think that, reviewing a product for millions is an advertisement for the company, even if its not directly meant to be.
I second this. Reviews should be honest and genuine.
It technically is it’s bringing attention to the product wether it’s a good or bad review at the end of the day people are going to make their own choices on if they should buy it
Stop glazing...
Agreed!
I dont get what everyone is talking about, saying "This is mkbhds company killing streak"... Thank you for the honest review Marques!! Appreciate you.
It’s so funny. He’s a tech reviewer, reviewing tech and people are flipping tf out
+1
Nice bought account and AI picture.
it's just dumb tech bros being mad that a thing they invested in or bought is crap and don't like hearing other people tell them that lol
@@ckf36 You mean Twitter degenerates? I dont think their opinions matter in the slightest
If it cost $30 it might be a toy for kids, but other than that it does nothing a phone can't do.
It doesn’t even do what a phone can do lol. It does minimal functions poorly. What a scam.
my 20 years old calculator is better than this sh!t. I mean I dont have to fvckng verify if that answer it gives arnt bowlsheet
Even for a toy, it gives a kid incorrect answers, which is awful
For kicks, I took a zoomed-in picture of the coffee arabica plant (which wasn't great, because it was a photo of an LED screen showing an image of an LED screen showing an image), and then used Google Lens. It CORRECTLY identified the plant in less time than the AI had to be wrong.
TFT*
@@nostalgean LCD*
@@mattymerr701Papyrus*
@@10goku83 psycho mantis*?
It clearly had an issue working out scale. A monstera kinda looks like that but is much bigger. The fruit is the size of a cob of corn, and delicious btw
The screen being a touch screen was a twist I did NOT see coming.
A touchscreen has been part of it since the unveil. It's been demoed multiple times.
SAME LMAO
Ok? @@MrTsolar
It's touch. They disable it at some points to make you use the scroll wheel
M Knight Shamalan twist
For people complaining about Marques' lack of love for the Rabbit R1, I'll say this... it is a heck of a lot easier, and more popular, to give a glowing review than to be honest and say that a product sucks. Kudos to MKHBD for calling a spade a spade.
With Fisker Ocean he had no idea what he was talking about
@@PT-mj3bk butthurt fanboy, and I don't even know ya
why the hell would or should he have love for quarter-baked cheap useless toy product like rabbit? Make good product - get good review. It's earned not given.
I wish MKBHD was consistent though. It's no secret that staying in the good grace of Apple requires unquestionable loyalty, but I think Marques is mature enough to spread his wings and start being sincere with everything he analyzes.
It's good that he's doing these pretty deep videos on such shallow tech, the production quality is excellent, as is the presentation. But he'll happily turn around and praise Apple Wheels or something equally useless just because he doesn't want to bite the hand that fed him :/
@@Galf506who fed who? where do u get the conclusion that he's paid by apple?
Coffeezilla may have executed the Rabbit R1, but Marques loaded the guns
love an AI buddy that just confidently answers questions wrong, just like having a real friend.
😂❤
LOL
Yeah, I also love how it allows us to experience what it must be like to have a friend.
Stop hating… Did you know that the flying aircraft carrier in Avengers is real, but it’s above top secret at Area 51? This thing gives all the info!❤
An AI that replies to every question with things found in transcripts of the Joe Rogan show will really let people embrace that 'dipshit roomate' relationship. THAT'S a product with a PURPOSE
"What are we even doing here?" is such a great line for where a lot of industries have gone to. Good review, good advice.
"Marques Brownlee MURDERS another AI startup!"
The start of that made me go "Oh, like what modern-day gaming is like?" Because, yeah, make the game half-way, release it, fix things up along the way, hope you fixed it to where it's what you said it'd be. Which is a pretty smart(?) way to get reviewers off your back, because you can always say "We're not done :)" if they criticize something.
Reminds me of Matthew from The Fish Files
Matthew Carlson moment
i can answer that: what we're doing is making a bunch of useless crap because there's an endless pile of cash being invested by private equity, and you don't need to actually make anything good to get the money from investors you just have to keep making more AI crap to drive the hype. Hype = a bazillion dollars from investors. The investment money will never go away because it's the only way to outpace inflation right now. But the investment money isn't driving any real sales. I believe this is called, a BUBBLE.
The absolutely wild thing is that it's now been revealed that Rabbit is literally just an app running on a modified version of Android. The device they're selling is just an Android device with a single app installed and permanently running. So why didn't they just make an app for Android phones instead? 🙄
Because you don't try to impress the tech bros in Silicon Valley with apps anymore, that's sooooo 2010's.
Hey, if engineers wanted to make a product, I say let them have the challenge. Maybe something else will come further down the line.
My guess is that that's their way to fund it.
People are less accepting of an app being $200 rather than a physical device that they hold, and they don't wanna make it a subscription service or sell data(props on them for making it a one-time purchase).
You also get the novelty of having a device just for a task. We could play all our games on phones, but we prefer other portable devices even if your phone is the strongest and you have a controller grip. It being just for gaming makes us find it more novel.
People are less accepting of anything unnecessary and redundant for 200$ doesn't matter if it's an app or not
cuz nobody wanna pay 200$ for an app
who's here after coffeezilla's newest video ?
Sir. Me. Ser!
Me lol
Me
🙋🏾
Called out lol
This AI-in-a-box assistant trend is like selling MP3 players in a smartphone era
MP3 players have some good usecases though
Wrong because mp3 players can actually be useful, phones don't have an aux anymore, and even the ones that do, don't have enough power or great audio quality.
These AI boxes are useless.
Yep. These things are bigger nuggets than CRAIG stuff.
No, MP3 players to their job well. It's limited but if that's what are you calling for, it's great.
These Ai assistants without all the context are not helping. And if you need Internet anyway, why should I not just pick my phone anyway?
@@JamesR624but can they survive the #1 grit
If this came out in 2005 I feel as if it would've made a lot more sense.
Now I imagined you making a “Using a Rabbit R1…from 19 years ago” video lmao
It still would have got the plant wrong....
Well, Siri was launched in 2011, Alexa in 2014 and Google Assistant came out in 2016 so yeah, if this came out in 2005 it would've disrupted the whole tech industry. 😂
Seriously though, if this came out in like 2012, 2013 I'm pretty sure it would've done a lot better than coming out now.
@@TheTruthKiwi Nah such low level gimmick like Rabbit-R1 isn't that groundbreaking at all. People with low braincell would already see its limitation while AR/VR has only reached its 1% potential which is the real future techs
This is like going backwards in technology than moving forward
Rabbit sure is lucky that the Humane pin came out before the R1
Imagine the pin released in its current state AFTER this and it got reviewed? That would be hilarious :p
Exactly my thought.
Doesn't mean, that they can get away with such an underdeveloped product. Or making a product for a problem that doesn't exist
It turns out this review actually applies to the Panels app...
So many of these AI things feel like dealing with a dimwitted project teammate. They're assigned to do things, and sometimes they do get their job done well enough, but they still get stuff wrong so frequently that you always have to check and correct their work, to the point that it's ultimately just faster and less frustrating to do it all yourself.
Like they didn't even use it themselves, just make for the profits, rather than customers orientated they choose money orientated
Yes I think it is the biggest problem of AI when after AI answer you start thinking is this true?
I know right! But the upside is that by correcting it you get to learn something new everytime.
@@Gui-sr2jw teach us how to use them right then
@@Gui-sr2jw in what way are they not using them right? For AI to be functional and useful, it needs to get things right with just a single prompt and admit when it doesn’t know. You sound like one of those people who say that you just need to guide the AI with prompts and “prime it”, which is a workaround at best. An AI should not need led to an answer, it should be able to answer correctly right away, the same as if you asked a human expert the question.
AI at this stage is still barely functional for most things and anyone that blindly trusts AI is a fool. Their analogy was spot on, AI is like an incompetent team member, you always have to check their work which is often incorrect and often end up having to do it yourself.
Oh wow! A pocket rectangle that I can press a button on to ask questions to a virtual assistant. I certainly don’t already have one of those that I carry around everywhere all the time 🙃
except this time it's worse because instead of a decision tree, it's a very inaccurate llm
This, but with the clown emoji
I already have one assistant, called it Wife.
@@tiyowprasetyo does you wife know this is how you see her and are proud to share that with the world?
@@beildiz yes sure she knows wife assisting husband is a good thing. Why do you ask? You wife never assist you? Or you don't have a wife? Or what?
The computer game industry has been perfecting this for decades. When I was doing my masters a decade ago, I told my professor how crazy things the gaming industry got away with in terms of early access and launching products with missing core features. It turns out, if you let one industry get away with it often enough, other industries start to take notice.
A decade ago, sure. But two decades? That seems to be pushing it to me. That's "Steam is that silly thing Valve forces us to install to play Half- Life 2" time frame. Third party games didn't even exist on it yet, according to Wikipedia. Then again, things did move pretty quickly so I guess it might be close enough that rounding up isn't a big deal. Or am I misremembering 2004?
@@mascot4950 You are right. The infamous Bethesda horse armor happened in 2006. I think it's somewhere between 10 and 20 years that things went off the rails for us consumers.
@stevens9625 Star Wars X Wing sold 'expansions' that ADDED STORY to it. That was the 90's. Because I guess a full story can't be sold in the base game lol
@@dizzydyzy That's.. what expansions are supposed to be. An addition that expands on the original game in meaningful ways, including story. Or are you saying the first game was artificially made into an incomprehensible mess, only to "force" people to buy expansions to make sense of it all? I'd need some evidence to support that claim.
Studying game design, and I’m really glad my professors are actively trying to encourage proper work (and consumer) ethics with gaming because it’s been getting absurd for both consumers and developers with how much this style of “release, and then develop” is becoming the norm
It would’ve been so much better with a 50$ wallpaper app built in
Basic syntax fail. "Fifty dollars" is correctly written as "$50", not "50$".
@@dunebasher1971 maybe they're not from the US. For many other currencies that's the way you'd write it.
Jesse: I don't think MKBHD will say this is the worst device he ever reviewed
Marques: It's the second worst device I've ever reviewed
hahaha!
😂
Well, it's a really scam-ish product, what would you expect MKBHD say...
@@Fllu Any new iPhone? Sure you're not just anti-apple yourself haha.
@@Flluthe top three best selling phones are iPhone. Is it something personal?
In Rabbit R2, they will introduce calling feature. and R3, you get dual sim and you can read all your emails.
In the R4 you'll get live emoji support
In the R5 you'll get an android phone with rabbit app installed on it
wait until they figure out there are search engines like Google
Copy-paste when?
@@Ali_Jafari wait, that's already the case 🤣
Marques has no chill with these titles lately 😂
He who reviews the barely reviewable
As he should.
I like it
it shows there are no actual good "new" product lately
Marques doesn't squeal with delight. {*koff* ijustine}
This thing is borderline a scam, and that was obvious from its dazzlingly stylised but completely opaque pre-sale advertising. It’s a shittier more annoying version of a phone, and teenage engineering should be ashamed for being involved with it. If FyreFest guy was in tech, this is exactly the bs he’d sell.
Oh boy, here we go
Finished watching: 200$ for a square box that will be wrong, without any significant features and that looks like a toy.
In other words, useless.
😂😂😂
The fact that they put a model ("R1") means that they probably have every intention making a number two... which is ironic, considering a number two is exactly what they made
ah more AI, this’ll be interesting
man why would he kill another company /s
oh boy no one cares about this ai garbage
You know what these AI companies should do, a Roomba, people already love their Roombas, Roombas just cleaning around and answering random questions, maybe even tell a bad joke once or twice, give it, it's own animated googly eyes, more dramatic dialogues when it's about to fall down
Tape an Alexa thing to the top of a roomba. :v
@@jackpijjin4088 bruh that's just DJ Roomba from parks and rec lolololol
@@doublet_inthemorning LMAO
Read that in a novel. Yes, a novel. The subject in question was an outdated cleaning robot, then MC (who transmigrated and becomes a genius because he was from the interstellar age) updated it to be completely intelligent and independent in the true sense of an AI.
We're born to early for these tech advances.
Awesome idea, add some Star Wars droid beeps and let it spew random facts on topics you've searched before when it senses a human and I would totally be on board!
When I saw the ad for the rabbit box on Twitter I thought it was like an ai tamagotchi and I’m super disappointed that it’s not
Imagine a Pokédex-esque toy where you take pictures of animals and “capture” them as AI pets
Dude, you are the most optimistic person of all time. This should have been 100% dunked on. It's garbage vaper ware that every current cell phone can do. You need to warn you viewers of scams, and this is clearly one
Company that designed this is pretty legit though, having won quite some design awards for the OP-1 synthesizer.
@@Tr1ploidI’m pretty sure this is a joke I don’t get. Is it?
@@felesnocis it isn't? All i'm saying is a company tends to get the benefit of the doubt if they have previously released successful products, this is a company with a legit reputation that is putting their name on the line for this product. TE isn't just some random Kickstarter startup with the intention to scam people. It's a firm whose products have been used by musicians ranging from Taylor Swift to Thom Yorke and Tame Impala. Although, to be fair, I think Teenage Engineering might just have been contracted for the physical design, and maybe they are not the actual product owners.
@@felesnocis the company that did the hardware for the rabbit is called teenage engineering, they are a legit company who just got commissioned to do the hardware for this ai scam. they have a lot of music related products like synthesizers.
Teenage engineering is seperate from the rabbit company, who made everything else and are the shady ones.
@@tiramika thanks!!! That’s actually super interesting.
Banger of a title. despite recent "controversy", please don't stop making honest, on point and clear reviews. It's invaluable for people to navigate a space filled with tons of mediocre products, a few downright bad ones and a few exceptional ones. You're among my top 3 go-to people when I need to decide my next smartphone or other tech products🙏
I’m glad to see we are making progress on Pokédex technology
one step closer to real pokemon, ill have my Psyduck one day
holy crap your right!
There is an AI device I would actually buy lol. You point it at an animal or record a bird call and it quickly and accurately identifies it and tells you ecological info about the spcies. As a biologist I would be all over that but I doubt the tech is there and I doubt the general public would want it
@@oo7799 i love cornell's merlin bird id app for this reason. It can identify birds by image or by sound, and its pretty damn accurate. I was surprised by how good the sound results were, I use it all the time when hiking/birdwatching now :)
Only issue is that it doesn't display information about the bird iirc, but you could easily cook something up with Cornell's BirdNET API for sound, maybe something like inaturalist for photos, and some basic database responses with Cornell's ebird (assuming that someone hasn't created something similar already, which i'm sure they have).
Who is that pokèmon?
It's Brownmonlee!
Rabbit's "introducing r1" video has the comments disabled rn, but a common complain was just "why isn't this just a mobile app?" XD
They're trying to make it a Pokedex lol
Because Ios 18 will bring LLMs and LAMs to the iPhone UI and Google and Samsung are already implementing LLMs into their phones UI, they will surpass the rabbit instantly (app or not).
This is just a cashgrab from the UI enthusiasts
@@AlexCuzais LAM confirmed for iOS ?
I blocked that ad after seeing it 3 times and being frustrated about the stupidity of the product 😂
Yeah, the product features are all just software, not hardware, so it could simply be an app.
Should have named your app " Rabbit Wallpapers"
Definitely feels like, "Hi. Would you like to be our beta tester for $200 and a lot of device babysitting?" It's like a Kickstarter where you get this skeleton of a thing upfront, and then if they sell enough skeletons to fund their R&D, you _might_ get what you paid for at some ill-defined future point.
Oh so what lazy video game devs have been doing for a decade?
@@SCIFIguy64 scammers*
@@SCIFIguy64yup yup. Gaming industry behavior is leaking.
Yeah, and if it ever gets to the point where it's actually good, they'll likely release a new version that is much better than yours. So you'll have to spend more money to get something that you've spent money to get years ago.
It is called 'piloting' :)
Marques is doing a great job. Without these kind of reviews, selling unfinished products would become the new normal.
Its nothing new I remember when PDAs first came out and most of them were just worst versions of laptops with barely any extra functionality.
when there is demand, there will be product.
@@KingLich451 Demand for bad products decrease with good information sources
Not quite. We still have brains of our own, and although I agree with him, I felt he was not harsh enough in dispensing with such nonsensical devices such as the R1 and Pin.
There's nothing in them that the recent OpenAI app and new model (GPT-4o) can't do and then some!
@@thecloudtherapisti agree, he’s definitely being too nice
My theory is Marques doesn’t want his inbox flooded with requests to review unfinished products anymore and he’s burying them as warning shots
Cold af, hopefully some others follows his footsteps, we don't need this stuff.
Then he should review the Ridge wallet, oh wait...
or, and hear me out, he's reviewing what he has in his hands now, and it sucks.
I’m loving these takedown videos
This has been a thing in gaming forever now this is happening in tech
Google is in a great position to create such a product!
All it needs to do is combine:
-Lens
-Assistant
-Gemini
-Put in some good speakers
-And their camera knowledge
-Package it into some metal and glass sandwich
-Call it maybe a …pixel phone
No an app
They're busy working on Google Ad
Don't give them ideas, they'll kill the Pixel line and replace it with the voxel
If you've got a pixel phone and watch you're 1000x better off but at a lot more expense though of course.
But why?!? Even a cheap sub $100 phone can do all that and more. smh
So the people who make this, they forget we ALL have cell phones?
Blizzard was right 😂
Siri, but slower, as a standalone device. Pay us $700!
this is the short I was seeing from our channel and now it's a video
I would die to have something like this as a kid. And since most kids shouldn't have a smartphone until 13 or something it might have a use case as a cool gadget for kids.
@@Pi7on do you guys not have a cellphone?
The "What are we doing here" section at 14:06 is a major insight. Would love to see a whole video on that topic!
3:03 when he turns the plant around is so funny, the AI reading a full essay 100% about the wrong plant
Should have showed the plant name to that Rabbit 😂😮
In this case, AI was correct, and the label on the plant was wrong! Coffea arabica is a coffee plant. Monstera deliciosa was the one he showed in the room.
Maybe it would be better if the R1 said, "I THINK it's a ... ", to convey that the answers it gives COULD be wrong; or offer a quantitative value to its answers, such as, 'It's 85% likely to be a.... and 15% likely to be ....'
@@warrenkawamoto8660 image search both plants, it is clearly not a Monstera deliciosa
Lol i was laughing "its very wrong"
Most polite "this product is crap" I've ever seen lmao
Thanks, I was scrolling to read comments while on min 3. This is all I need to know to move on with my life.
I know this comment is old but I just gotta say that this is the first comment I've seen with 1k likes and only one (now two) replies
@@longpants108 also probably the most likes I've ever gotten on a comment 😂
They are developing products in reverse for two reason:
1. Anticipation of the first mover advantage
2. Agile Software Development principles being applied to paid products which are not services (phones, cars, video games).
Once you realize that companies value being first over being the best then everything becomes clear.
Bro studied Economics and use his knowledge in YT Comments n1.
i don’t quite agree agile is to blame here (well, not directly, but certainly not in any way that it doesn’t already affect services and so on). don’t forget that agile, specifically kanban, was created by toyota to make car production more efficient, it was only adopted by software developers much later down the line
You forgot the main reason: people keep buying them. The "consumer" mentality is so rampant that people care more about getting the latest and greatest thing rather than a finished product.
No
Reason one: make money from gullible people that also buy apple products or something
thats kinda pretty much it.
your phone has better hardware and access to better ai's, there's no logical explanation for getting one of these, unless you're a apple buyer and you're used to buying inferior products for more money,
social status? trend? yes
actually being first is a disadvantage in business. it's called the First-Mover disadvantage. maybe your ai hallucinated some stuff for your comment
Just watched 2 series of coffeezilla's video about this, and I'm convienced that this thing is just another scam
Hey, it's like a smartphone but with a worse processor, screen and battery, and it has no phone and doesn't work but apart from that it's great so lay off!
At 56 seconds in "and you have to carry around like a smartphone" okay you lost me, I already have one of those.
literally
“It could have been a app” is the best review for such boxes
That's because it... IS... An app. An old one too. These are mind boggling.
It's already an app, it's called ChatGPT. Really annoys me to see people literally making a little box where all it does is use ChatGPT. No thanks, at least if that shit ran locally it'd have some value. There's literally no situation where you would use this piece of shit device.
The news is out, it is essentially an android-app after all running on a trimmed version of Android.
“Instead of just building an app, let’s build a box that you need another SIM card to use, with a nonfunctional touch screen, and 4 hours of battery life. Then let’s put the app in that box. People will love this.”
What I want from an Assistant:
- look things up for me (don’t make up answers!!)
- schedule events and alarms for me
- work as a timer
- hook in to reverse image search or something
- interact with other subservices (email, grocery list, etc)
The AI part should just be for optimizing queries for looking things up IMO.
Yeah and the funny thing is every smartphone has those functions and also has way more usability than just asking it to do things.
This product should of been an app
Criminally underrated and under interacted comment
the AI part could also be used for "personal" interactions, such as a "tell me a joke" query
so an iphone?
After watching Coffeezilla's newest video on The Rabbit,
All the people who went at Marques Brownlee's review of This product. I would like to know their Opinion now. Are people just going to let them slide? They need to keep that same energy.
He seems much too soft now.
@@zoa9720 well yeah he literally becoming a corporation not a big youtube the bigger you are on yt the more corpo you need to be but that doesn't mean you should be too much of a corpo because hey last times someone try that their company stock when downhill
1:15 I asked (or rather, played back Marques asking) the same moon question to Siri on a 2014 iPad and it answered (correctly) in under 3 seconds, way faster than the 2024 Rabbit 🤷🏻♂
Same from Google Assistant on a 2017 Pixel. Had to dust it off just to be able to add to the list of things that can outpace the Rabbit
My iPhone 5C from 2013 on 12MBs WiFi was faster than the rabbit. Let me put a little more perspective to it. A phone that is 11 years old. With a 12 year old chip. On WiFi that has 2011 speeds was faster than a new product
Well yeah, search engines are tried and tested algorithms. AI inference takes an absurd amount of compute time, and its not even accurate because its not searching anything. These are advanced text predictors that burn electricity. As soon as the industry understand their nature the grifting will die down. AI has its place and can be amazing, but for "facts" its less than worthless. That's what search engines are for.
You don't even need to ask, just point Google lens to it, it's like 1 second. ( It also recognized the rabbit in 1 second before I zoomed the plant )
@@CarolinaCycloneJames The phone has nothing to do with Siri. It's all processed by the same servers whether it's an iPhone 5 or 15. Siri also has a much smaller data index to search.
I’ve been in the Healthcare industry for a decade. Companies do this ALL the time. Sales departments sell products that aren’t even in the MVP phase yet. Sell, and then build.
Well, sales teams have ALWAYS promised more than the products can do. Most sales people are just stereotypical "used car salesman" at heart, at least sometimes.
i worked in healthcare as a software developer and the things i learned terrified me. the healthcare industry is more than happy to risk patient health to cut corners. i’ll never work in that industry again.
@@davedujour1hey now, some of us sell with integrity.
@@davedujour1and that’s why this things a POS. They sold it first, and built it after
@@slipperynickelshmm
"Buy the product based on what it is today, and not what it promises to be in the future" damn MKBHD goes hard on that one
But countless people have said that before him.
They had to get it out now. The generative AI chatbot bubble could pop at any moment.
People have been giving this advice for years about pre-ordering games. Now it's happening in tech and automobiles, and still no one is listening.
@@presidentbusiness5982 The Verge has been saying this for a decade. And yeah, people don't listen..
He has been saying this for ages
This is exactly how the gaming industry has been operating for years. Delivering a product that you pay for then after a year or two, giving half the product and the rest behind a paywall. To think I liked this idea.
Humane AI Pin and Rabbit R1 feel like two varients of a gadget that existed 5-10 years before the first smartphone and later became obsolete when ios and android developed apps to do their thing.
I can almost see them existing in that alternate history, in the past. Almost, because of the abysmal battery life. And since mobile phones spoiled us into always keeping devices on, I can imagine a daily user of one of these things using them back in the day. They'd just whip this thing out, switch it on, use it, and immediately switch it off after use. The switching on and off functions have to be quick like a digital camera or a laser measure. The fact that the infrastructure made to support mobile phones are what powering these things is really not helping my imagination.
This is absolutely spot on
Copied comment
Reminds me of Zune, remember that ancient piece of garbage?
They remind me of a Zune, Microsoft's failed attempt to make an iPod
It's basically trying to be a "Personal Electronic Terminal" (PET) from the Mega Man: Battle Network games. "Personal AI assistant to do everything from send emails to change the thermostat" was pretty much the central conceit of the game's setting... plus a healthy does of Internet of Things, where one's refrigerator is connected to the internet for no adequately explained reason.
Which, admittedly, seemed a lot less realistic in the 2000s before refrigerators started being connected to the internet for inadequately explained reasons.
6:19 I out loud yelled “wtf why”. The lengths people go to, in order to redesign something simple in order to stand out
Saaame... At first when he was describing the controls I was thinking "I guess they didn't implement touch to save on costs or something" but then no, they just chose not to use an entire mode of input
well the answer is pretty simple, if the touch screen was more obvious investors would compare it to a phone, then they probably would less willing to invest because a phone isn't new but this AI device with a scroll wheel well that's "new". Both this and humane were devices that were not made to be good products but rather just products made to trap investors into giving a mountain of cash.
It's just a gimmick `unique idea` for cash grab, from both consumers and `AI` investors.
That's Teenage Engineering. They're notorious for "reinventing" things. Look up their "Field Desk." It's a $1,600 desk made out of aluminum and plywood. They have a thoroughly established reputation in the music production community for selling things that cost 10x what their competitors charge.
And they’re going to change the world? What a sick joke!
Love how it saw an indoor plant and then just identified it as the most popular indoor plant, despite having a completely different leaf shape.
That’s what I identified it as 😂
Ah yes, a new entry into the "problems already solved by the smartwatch" category, love that one
Funny, I was thinking the exact same thing.
Just wish there were more options for standalone smartwatches.
So very true!
Minus the camera functionality, yeah, smartwatches should be the target for a lot of these AI feature overhauls
It's an AI toy for children aimed at parents with money to burn. They can use it to go around and learn about things. They won't get addicted to games or social media with it, or be exposed to adult content. The design language of the product looks like a toy, I don't see why people are comparing it to a phone.
When you see the Rabbit R1 turned off comments on their videos and shorts you know what is going on and the quality of this product .
Apple also turns off comments on a lot of their videos...
@@rushinburrito That's just Apple being Apple, they always turn off their comments. This company however is not a multi trillion dollar company.
@@rushinburritobut apple didn't create a scam crypto project and take people's money and put it into a shitty AI box.
@@ArbiterofMankindthey're both massive wastes of money, so the comparison kinda works
@@gramfero well, one successfully got a cult following, despite service and the quality of their product. The other is trying. Let’s see if they are successful.
"Isn't this basically just an app? Phones already do everything this does, so why not just make an app instead of a whole new device?"
Even then I'd question why you'd need the app when the phones built in assistant does it already. Who is the target market for these ???
What app do you use to identify an item with the camera in one second's time from opening up your swipe screen?
Google assistant @@redb2112
@@MattZildjian The same type of people who lost tons of money on NFTs.
And then Apple improves Siri with AI and this stuff becomes obsolete
Bro you’re explaining the exact reason why I sometimes hate working for tech. Seriously it’s that age old waterfall vs agile approach. And now companies want to keep releasing “mvps” when in reality it’s just them delivering bullsh*t as a money grab.
This was made by teenagers…like he sajd in the video
Teenage(.)Engineering ≠ teenagers
@@unlimitedpancakes I don't know, I feel like even when I was a teenager I could have designed a better product than this given the resources, and I definitely know that I could have called this out as bullshit and a scam. Fools and scammers come from all age categories.
Yea stop with agile mentality being used everywhere
Wait til you start working with scaled agile as a business strategy. Icky
1990: Keep an eye on your tamagochi
2024: Your electric rabbit keeps an eye on you
Tamagotchi was more like 1998
Better if they make a tamagochi, the astetic already good enough
Please stop
@nalaredneb78
~No.~
The shell has spoken!
ALL HAIL THE MAGIC CONCH !!! ululululululululluululululululu
Uno reserve card
In German we say "Bananenprodukt, reift beim Kunden" which translates to "Banana product, ripes at the Customer"
even in english, german still don't make sense
@@braintrust12 LOL
Makes sense to me. Great expression.
@@braintrust12 *it ripens with the customer/ it matures with the costumer
@@tofu666 "at" is the correct translation: "beim" (being a contraction of "bei dem") indicates a correlation of objects in space.
who here after coffeezillas video lmaooo
✋
lol yup
The section "What are we doing here" deserves its own video. Well said.
I think so too! It's a terrible trend, it's good that people are speaking their minds about it, especially in tech and gaming
Looking at the folded up z flip on your desk, this is EXACTLY what this reminds me of. Someone could achieve quite literally the exact same functionality but better if they just made it an app for the cover screen of the z flip, having the onboard processor, great camera and proper battery life.
Except making an app for a specific niche phone isn’t a good business idea either
@@juliet4093yeah, that's why the apple vision goggles thing isn't getting too much attention from devs
These guys want to make the maximum profit of this Tool (I am not calling it AI because AI does not exist).
If you make an app of it, you cannot charge the amount of money they charge for this.
I could see Samsung making Bixby able to do a lot of the tasks Rabbit can do. Leave the Z Flip closed, press a button and ask Bixby to do stuff. Many Android apps support accessibility features, which would enable Bixby to execute "macros".
@@diidac17 AI exists, this product is ai based, your phone also has ai present within it, this is a really weird hill to die on
The fundamental problem with all of these "AI in a box" products is that the AI isn't actually in the box. They're pocket sized devices that record audio and/or pictures, send that to a server, and tell you what the server said. You know what else is a pocket size device that can record audio/video and communicate with a server? Your phone.
They're devices the size of a phone, which cost as much as a phone, and require a cell plan like your phone and the only thing they do is talk to talk to a slightly more advanced chat bot than the one your phone already uses. It's not even a straight upgrade to things like Google Assistant and Siri, because Google Assistant and Siri can consistently do math correctly and dont hallucinate
It's the app in a box...
I guess if you tried to stuff LLM in such a small box, the box would melt.
It's an AI toy for children aimed at parents with money to burn. They can use it to go around and learn about things. They won't get addicted to games or social media with it, or be exposed to adult content. The design language of the product looks like a toy, I don't see why people are comparing it to a phone.
@@PomuLeafEverydayIt has the design language of a toy because that's trendy right now, but it was developed and marketed as a serious AI assistant that could do things like make transactions and communicate with others on your behalf. The original CES demo, which lead to them selling out the preorder editions, was all about how it can make purchases and book things like travel all on its own.
If that's the use case, it makes a little bit of sense, still absurdly expensive though
Returning it before I open the box.
Thx MKBHD!
Good Luck 👍
I completely respect what Marques is doing. All of these companies are just using AI to pump out crap tech. Call 'em out and tell it the way it is! That's why we respect you so much.
These startup companies seem to clearly be hoping that a clueless Zuck or Musk or other mega-cap CEO desperate to 'innovate' (because they can't) will buy them for massive amounts of money...without asking the basic business 'But, why?' question.
And what is he doing?! If it's not a product made by Apple or Tesla he's not going to slobber all over their knob and say that it's the best product ever and what credentials does he have other than just being a UA-cam reviewer?! Does he have any college education to back up any of his reviews or claims or anything like that? No he doesn't
@@ericluis2710 he literally has a university degree relevant to tech and business. but that's not why people listen to him
@@ericluis2710are you saying that he didn’t go to college (Stevens Institute of Technology)? Or that his degree (Business and Information Technology) can’t possibly be a foundation for tech reviewing?
It's just Google lens
I can't believe they're trying to pull the wool over people's faces
And Google lens works a thousand times better
And it's free
I am old so I have a story…
I remember when PC’s needed to have a ROM (read only memory) chip shipped to you to remediate a defect in its BIOS
(Basic I/O System). It happened but was really rare and BIOS code was well written and solid because it was expensive to fix. Then in the 1990’s, the ability to flash BIOS updates was released. I immediately predicted the tendency of manufacturers to increasingly release poorer code because it “can be fixed later”. And we’ve been living with that mentality and its trend towards increasingly poorer product code ever since. *It can be fixed later!*
Moral of the story: Don't be an early adopter.
This kind of thinking has permeated every aspect of modern life. Most hardware undergoes planned obsolescence. Video games do this so often that gamers call this the "Day One Patch" syndrome. Don't get me started on smartphones.
Software engineer here. It's mostly Band-Aids upon Band-Aids
Thats just not true, code just got way more complex it's not at all worse quality. Code in the 80s-00s were literally killing people in medical equipment and etc and the code was relatively simple compared to the billions of lines in large programs now
@@jaytbo5676 you got any other excuses?
Unforseen consequence of this: Ads could start including UI elements from other pieces to trick the AI into clicking their links and they could possibly not have the intelligence to avoid that in a LAM
You say this like this isn't a thing ads already do regularly to try to trick real humans with fake download buttons.
@@veraxis9961 AI would be doing this like 99% of the time as opposed to what is essentially Darwinism
@@real_Clone_Gordon_Freeman would still be Darwinism on the dev's part. running your crawler without adblocking is moronic.
Actually that might be genius. If you run the crawler with ads then it could potentially learn what to avoid.
Running it with an ad blocker so it never learns what to avoid could backfire badly the moment an ad slips through the net.
The big question that none of these "AI assistant" product answer is "why should I buy this, when I own a smartphone?"
Both this and the AI pin, are just things that do some of what my smart phone does and does that stuff poorly.
These companies want you to basicly review their promises and future plans. Not the device they are selling you.
Hell yeah thats like a prototype
Assuming it can be updated it may be what it wants to be eventually.... but something tells me when/if they finally get where they want to be, they will release an h2 model you need to buy to utilize it all.
Elon business plan...except they're not Elon
This product sucks but Teenage Engineering is a really cool company if you are into musical instruments. They are actually very well loved
U mean, they want you to fund their future projects by buying this junk.
6:16 “I feel like a lot of these problems would be solved if this was a ……” [my answer] smartphone
t's an AI toy for children. They can use it to go around and learn about things. They won't get addicted to games or social media with it, or be exposed to adult content. The design language of the product looks like a toy, I don't see why people are comparing it to a phone.
@@PomuLeafEverydaychildren’s dont need AI
@@PomuLeafEveryday"the design language looks like a toy" that's just what teenage engineering designs look like. Usually design like this would be called "industrial", "sleak" and "modern" not "a toy"
@@sinom Then just market it for children. Problem solved. It would do really well as a kids educational toy. Already reminds me of how they use a Pokédex in the Pokémon anime.
@@PomuLeafEverydayso your saying Nintendo (or someone collaborating with ) needs to make an ai device in the form factor of a Pokédex?
the easiest way to give this product an audience, RIGHT NOW, would just be to make the rabbit like a pet, you can feed it, you can play games with it, but its also incredibly smart.
Tamagotchi vibes
Yeah we had that back in the '90s. Mine always died.
fr.
it would be so much better even if they just gave it some different animations to show that it's listening or "thinking" and so on
True but it would also turn it into a toy. and the company seems to not want that. They want it to be a personal assistant that is supposed to make your life easier.
Actually just turn it into an AI powered Tomagotchi. That's brilliant.
The modern Tech market just feels like it forces every consumer to become an investor with all of the risk and non of the reward. You buy a product now and it's just as much of a gamble as buying stock.
Sir, a second MKBHD review has hit UA-cam
😔✈️🏢🏢
@@saleplainsQueue Stakeholders jumping from the top floor.
@@saleplains my favorite holiday 🥳🎉🎉
Rabbit, does this window here on the top floor open, and how long til I hit the floor!
fuckin underrated
Someone took the APK and put it on an android, programmed volume up as the button, and the little rabbit was able to answer questions as if it were in the R1 hardware and was able to connect to the RabbitOS servers just fine.
Yes but is the phone bright orange and "kool" ?
@@ishanjoshi1350 no. It just had better everything when it came to hardware 🤣
It really does make you wonder why they don't just have these things be a phone app or android distro to begin with. Because at least then if it doesn't work great on launch, at least you get the rest of the phone.
@@RAFMnBgaming Because it being an app wouldn't get millions in funding or hundreds of media articles, that's the only reason these things are not just an app
@@tenshiinen ah i see, greed
"We're gonna have 800+ apps, but here's 4 bad ones to get started" already sounds so sus lol
Yeah crazy that they only had 4 ready to go and they still think let’s release this and see who wants to pay 200$ for 4 free phone apps and Siri. 😅 if you release it with 100 apps then I might believe you can actually reach 800 😂
my question is why does this company asks for 200$ to be a beta tester and my training data?
Depends on if you trust the company. Jessie is a solid dude and it's a $200 ticket to a show I want to watch.
@@MrPisster lol, are you from the PR team? Is this how you justify paying hard earned money to a device that is useless at the moment but will be useful in the future but its not guaranteed? Admit it. This is a quick cash grab scam. I almost had a brain aneurism while reading the "$200 ticket to a show I want to watch" part.
@@MrPisster They even turned off the comments for all of their videos. Do you think they'll deliver the promise if they're doing stuff like that from the very beginning?
Ruh Roh, When Coffee is putting out a video on a product you know it's more than just a bad product!
😂 I had to see what this thing was. Just watched the coffee video. These guys should have just shut up and took the review in stride. Smh
I didn’t know that beverages had opinions
It’s very interesting that companies are now trying to sell half baked products and then advertise them otherwise
What is a problem we don't need to solve?
Video Game Enthusiasts: "First time?"
omg hi I love your videos!
Lenovo: Been there, still doing that
@@mdmackintyou little fangirl beat it 🤡
there has been a pattern with the quality of these "ai assistant" products
AI's not going anywhere soon, and it's definitely going to change our lives in very real ways. But right now, we are definitely in the hype part of the cycle, where there are a bunch of products promising to change our lives when they're not even capable of doing what they claim to do well.
I suppose non-existent is a quality
At least this Rabbit product seems to reflect its price better than the AI Pin does. Having said that, it doesnt change the failure of the product anyways.
It's what happens when dumb investors that don't know anything hear a new buzzword to jump onto, you can empty their pockets by just saying "yes yes ai sir yes sir its ai" then producing a bare minimum product
Safe assumption going forward is that AI-focused products like this are just entirely pointless.
$200 is outrageous. I just got a Samsung Tab A9+ (a twelve incher) for $220 and its absolutely brilliant.
It can do everything a phone can, on a huge vibrant screen, and i can download any and all AI apps ever developed for android (guaranteed more features than the R1 has), and i can play games on it, watch netflix, message friends, fly my drone with it as the display, and livestream.
And if i want to use more sophisticated AI tools, i can run Parsec to remotely control my home desktop PC (and its local AI models, for image generation or text prompting). And yes, "large action models" can exist locally on your own pc with very very little Pyton knowlede (two hours of tutorials and you can set up your own environment with multiple AI agents collaborating to solve tasks).
I can even, in this way, use my tablet to remotely edit videos in Davinci Resolve. Oh but i need an internet connection to do that? Yes, and the R1 needs a connection to the cloud as well..
Tell me again why i'd pay $200 for an R1 Rabbit? Because it fits in my pocket? My phone does.
Umm it's $600 in some places
bro pls
To have sth new and "cool" of cause.😎
it does show you that their scale factors are off though.
The lame thing is you can't just toss $200 bucks at this to have a "what were they thinking" item to add to your retro tech collection, as once all the online services are dead it's just an orange box that doesn't do anything.
You just saved me $200 that I was sorta kinda considering spending to as this to my "what were they thinking" retro electronics collection 😆
Yup, it’s a front-end to a cloud service, and one with terrible power management at that.
Someone got Doom to run on it, so there that. It’s literally just a cheap Android device made out of bargain-bin parts so technically you could do anything you want with it if you jailbroke it, I guess.
@@theblah12 doom has run on an actual potato honestly not that impressive. i dunno why teenage engineering worked on this, they're much too good for this type of work
Reminder that TE had a really cool little music workstation for around $850, took it off the market, put it back up for like $1200, then took it off AGAIN, then re-relisted it AGAIN for over $2000. Same exact unit with very few updated features and the same 'intentional limitations' as the original unit.
Fictitious capital go brrr
@DoctorSoctopus Yeah. That's not even 'supply and demand' economy, it's just greed.
I have their little boombox unit, its nice. I paid 650...probably $400 is the right price
Looks like a school project for an electronics or embedded devices class, like they added a scroll wheel because the rubric required wiring multiple components together.
Does it not remind you of Yo Gabba Gabba video gadget? It looks exactly like it!
I'd say this "releasing unfinished products" is just an extension of Agile Software Development model where, instead of building the whole car from scratch, you build the scooter, then the wagon, etc. The problem is defining the MVP (minimum viable product). In the car scenario, you can't sell the scooter and tell consumers it'll be a car next year.
My entrepreneurial brain half listens. My consumer brain half screams.
I had the same thought. Personally, I'm sick of people trying to make everything agile. It's not a one-size-fits-all model, and I've seen it fail several times when people try to force agile.
Tesla did that. Sold cars on a promise the cars will get better and get self driving and whatever Later™. Years later.
The problem is that MVP and the Agile Software Development model is best suited for development teams working on a software product for a specific client, IMO. You make a minimal viable product, to your client and you get immidiate feedback that you can then use for the next sprint, doing this for a product that you are selling to the public as a complete product then using the public as a product owner for feedback is not how it's supposed to be used.
I’m a long-time product agilist, and skateboards should not be sold to customers as some sort of larval stage of a scooter, bicycle, motorcycle, or car. If you do that, you lose the entire benefit of shipping a skateboard and learning about the skateboard’s minimal use case. You do not want customers who will judge a skateboard or scooter according to how well it does a fractional implementation of a car.
Remember "This meeting could be an email?" this whole device could just be an app
The problem is the venture capitalists who invested millions into this before things like ChatGPT were mainstream. They realized that google and apple have way better AI assistants coming out this year which would make this piece of crap, and the humane AI pin completely obsolete, so it's a mad dash to get it to market to get as much as their original investment back as possible. The executives at Rabbit and Humane all know their products are dogshit, but can't say anything or they'll be sued. All of the engineers are probably under contract to finish the product as well so can't back out easily until it's launched. Thus you have a device that shouldn't exist, and everyone knows it sucks, but it gets launched anyways.
Exactly what I was saying ever since the rabbit r1 was launched! Then make subscriptions for it
There is already an app for it, called ChatGPT. Allows voice input, image input, hands free conversation style voice input, file input and of course regular text.
@@MarkusWaas fair! Maybe for the whole connecting with other apps thing and learning how you do things and do it for u?🤷🏼♂️
@@aegon_the_conquerer9563 it could be a progressive web app with those permissions, it doesnt need to be a device
As a hobbyist hardware guy and actual professional software guy, this feels like a side-project made with common off the shelf part and mostly open-source software. It's not a dunk on it, it's a device made with love and care, but it's a side project that hint at what could be done, rather than a serious statement.
Totally looks like something i could make with a 3D printer and a raspberry pi at home.
Yeah but there’s now a subset of people who have only used consumer end electronics who want “quirky”tech that we don’t have to think about too much
It’s an app in a consumer device
You are too romantic. I liked how you look at the life ngl. But, yeah you said "it's device made with love and care", man you don't know that :)
Yep, seems like it could have just been an app.
Those concepts should be an app on your phone costing $5.99 a month. But they get greedy and figure: let's build a stand alone device and get some big $$$. Ain't gonna happen of course. At least they should start with an app and maybe in the long run they could go for a device even though imho it'd still be a very hard (if not impossible) sale.
A computer that fits in your pocket?
Now I think I’ve seen everything.
isnt that just a phone
@@alauniyahh Yes. I don't think he's being sincere with that comment. 😂
@@alauniyahh Vrooooom!
@@alauniyahhsarcasm
I know! What's next, a telephone that can take pictures!?
Love the backdrop with all the orange accents!
Dude this new era of calling stuff for what it really is, please never stop. You're changing the game for the better my friend, keep up the good work!
He's always done this tho
I kinda like the concept, I would put this in my pocket and be my assistant at work, reduce my mistakes...but for the general public it really doesn't make much sense...if you do something like than I would recommend something niche for work
I’m amazed by the color coordination of the set etc.