For page 22, an attacker could get the information of (A, u, v, k). I think it should be the 'c' the attacker get. If the attacker could have 'c', and assume there's lots of bit 0 in the transmission, then he could know what the value of 'k'. If he subtracts every 'c' from 'k', we could decipher the message. This is strange.
Thank you for the presentation!! Very much appreciated.
For page 22, an attacker could get the information of (A, u, v, k). I think it should be the 'c' the attacker get. If the attacker could have 'c', and assume there's lots of bit 0 in the transmission, then he could know what the value of 'k'. If he subtracts every 'c' from 'k', we could decipher the message. This is strange.
Nice presentation. I do wish the questions had been repeated to the audience for the benefit of the recording.
Most of the Questions have been repeated by the speaker. Please don't mislead the people.
2:15:15 why in key exchange Alice took r^t.A instead of r. A
any ideas for signature aggregation?
19:00
39:00 lattice-based crypto
51:00 intuition
Very interesting
The video is virtually useless. The questions are not audible and dilute the content.
Why are they wearing masks? I was gonna watch this until I realize the speaker and all the attendees are mentally ill.
They were required too by the university.