The druid should've hit themselves for 14 in the face earlier. Of course, they had no way of knowing Toast was running a meme deck with no way to clear all the trees and hit face on the same turn. Still would've lost eventually once they ran out of heals, though.
Yo I just love the evolution of toast.. from being a masked mad lad to being this handsome clean cut meme god.. that’s a Pog in my book and you deserve a round of applause
Yeahhh.. if druid would have just copied the prelate twice with faceless, he would have had healing every turn for laucenbarks and all he would have to do is punch toast prelate to life steal his Laucenbarks back.
3:52 if only you hero powered, you could’ve killed his Lucenbark next turn and would’ve avoided his snowball. I mean it’s a free hero power or am I missing something?
5:29 anyone else notice that when toast played countess that it pulled 2 deathrattle minions? confirmed that countess will pull prelate if you give lit lifesteal!
Ya know what would be a cool addition to this series? If Toast did a game to test the deck (or two, his choice), and then add things to the deck that would make it good, thus fixing it, and talk about why it doesn't work well, and what would fix it, and then do a game with the fixed version. Then, people could learn from these videos as well, and that would make for a more interesting series!
Toast is showing everyone that it is not only the deckpower that matters, its understanding what the other deck's win conditions are in short: he's showing of his intelligence :)
so if the heal druid had hero power tanked the BIG BOY earlier he could have healed his face avoiding healing the BIG BOY which in consequence healed toast
Did no one see the infinite undertaker strat ? "When it dies put it to your deck" "When it dies if it has more than 4 attack resummon it" Or is it not working cause he goes to the deck anyway ?
@@yann5546 it works, i run a version of this deck with prelate, villain and undertakah. Undertakah shuffles himself into the deck yes but he also re-summons a copy of itself cause of villains deathrattle that stays on board so you'll keep shuffling more copies into deck and always re-summon one on board.
@@Novakayne27 That is not correct. The "revived" copy of Undatakah (through villain) has no deathrattles. It's "blank". Playing Prelate Paladin by myself, removed villain, added Faceless for more prelates.
The problem is that villan is REALLY slow to play for 5 mana and for a deck that already meeds a lot of ramp it is questionable whether it is worth it. With undertaker it summons a vanilla 8/5
i think you missed the point of this deck; the idea is not to buff the prelates; it is to buff undertaker, he gets lifesteal, gets resurrected, deals aoe whenever he dies, and gets shuffled back in the deck. this actually seems really fun; you should have tried to go for that, instead of uploading a regular prelate game; i dont have the cards for this, so i cant build it, i was hoping to see that combo here :(
@@JacobXFG You don't have infinite Undatakahs through villain. You gain one Undatakah without deathrattles on the board. Infinite Undatakah only works with Prelate (and playing it again and again and again).
@@mislavblazevic8505 But you have Call for Adventure and you can mulligan for them... so.... Crystology seems very weak. Also, it's a dead card, once you buffed your prelates.
@@Cerealz01killer he actually did on his 2nd faceless but I think he just really wanted to set up 4 Lucentbarks, and he did burn his floop which probably cost him the game
Slowly realizing that this series is just deck doctor, but toast doesn't actually fix the deck.
He just fixes the winrate.
yapp :D just put a Formula 1 driver into a crappy car and win. #easy
so deck necromancer?
rubix missed opportunity to say deckromancer
Didn’t one guy bring this deck to worlds. That was in a warrior target lineup tho.
For a toast is never late nor early. He arrives precisely when my insomnia needs him to.
3:20 the satire toast displays is genuinely impeccable, knowing bark druid cant heal to resurrect later
The druid should've hit themselves for 14 in the face earlier. Of course, they had no way of knowing Toast was running a meme deck with no way to clear all the trees and hit face on the same turn. Still would've lost eventually once they ran out of heals, though.
@@GeekProdigyGuy if toast had a different draw, the druid could of set up lethal with alexstraza but he needed to draw the 5 5s on the right turn
Infinite value > Almost infinite value
Yo I just love the evolution of toast.. from being a masked mad lad to being this handsome clean cut meme god.. that’s a Pog in my book and you deserve a round of applause
Please my good sir. I am late to the memes. What exactly does pog mean? I see it everywhere regarding toast
It was originally an acronym that meant Play Of the Game.
@@GlacialScion ahhh I see, thankyou
Toast: *Plays worst decks in hearthstone*
Twitch chat: "Toast why don't you play the best deck instead? It would fix the deck"
The unstoppable force VS An immoveable object
Because he can take it.
Comes down to which gives up first really.
The problem with the inmoveable object in this game is that it runs out of things to keep it inmovable
Will somebody forgive the immortal prelate! Jeez
Yeahhh.. if druid would have just copied the prelate twice with faceless, he would have had healing every turn for laucenbarks and all he would have to do is punch toast prelate to life steal his Laucenbarks back.
And if Toast kept his minion ‘reduce attack to 1’ then it wouldn’t matter. Conclusion: both players didn’t know how to play a ridiculously rare
This is fuc king awesome yup, that guy had a few mistakes
*laughs in silence*
@@dusanristic4564 Laughs in Mass Dispel
@@1998marijn1998 It would have mattered wdym... he could only reduce the attack of 1 prelate?
I am loving this series
15:25 druid could damage for 2 his archmage and heal him for 5 to not heal prelate and make a board
how did he would take 2 damage? Taunt is 14 , he can't attack is own minions and he don't have enough mana to spell + heal.
@@brunoscotto4549 he got two spells for one mana from druid legendary, archmage 3 hp, damage him for 2, heal for 5, no need to attack
@@brunoscotto4549 aaaaand he had 4 mana left without doing the right play
For those who are wondering- the chat during the other half of this battle was mainly just “Not your home invader Pogchamp”
who needs sleep when you can watch toast win at life
Honestly, Toast has a lot of patience for some of the most dim people typing liquid brain level of comments in his Twitch chat.
Amen
Super fun Series!
This video shows what will happen when an unstoppable Force meets an object that cannot be moved
More like an unstoppable _and_ unmovable object meets an almost unmovable object
Toast passing over the fact that recurring villain gives you infinite undertaker. :(
This was infuriating
He literally told that in the start of this video
Predatory Instinct: Draw a Bill Cosby... Hahaha ha I'm fucking dead XD
The deck idea is cool though
I also think it would be viable with small adjustments
Remember having similar idea back when paladin quest was a thing- Ofc it included the quest :P
I mean if this goes on toast goes full circle and plays actually meta decks... Sick
3:52 if only you hero powered, you could’ve killed his Lucenbark next turn and would’ve avoided his snowball. I mean it’s a free hero power or am I missing something?
Mind Control Tech.
When an unstoppable force meets an immovable object
but toast, that is not your home, youre invading his home
Food wars?
That's why the prelates keep saying "forgive me!"
@@JDWonders hehe
The fight between the Prelates and the Lucentbarks might as well be canon cuz of how well the interactions interact with eachother
Hey toast, I'm pretty sure we can crowdfund some heating for your place, must be horribly cold for you to always wear a jacket inside :(
5:29 anyone else notice that when toast played countess that it pulled 2 deathrattle minions? confirmed that countess will pull prelate if you give lit lifesteal!
ehm... Toast pointed it out after he played Countess.
Ya know what would be a cool addition to this series? If Toast did a game to test the deck (or two, his choice), and then add things to the deck that would make it good, thus fixing it, and talk about why it doesn't work well, and what would fix it, and then do a game with the fixed version. Then, people could learn from these videos as well, and that would make for a more interesting series!
So firebats deck doctor series
@@kingslayer86 I guess, though I have no clue who that is.
See. This is why I subscribe to toast. *The Haircut*
Gotta be honest, I feel like Toast lucked out on his opponent this game. Basically the perfect deck to face with the immortal prelate deck.
Ctrl war is also a really good matchup
Why did Toast leave Lucenbark alive at 5:40? At least force the opponent to burn some heal cards before they can copy Lucentbark.
Toast is showing everyone that it is not only the deckpower that matters, its understanding what the other deck's win conditions are
in short: he's showing of his intelligence :)
I wonder how the lucent bark + Recurring Villain + Undatahka would be
yo im using reoccuring villian with the weap that buffs minons that come into play, kinda works with a low curve.
For a sec I thought prelate said “fuck-ing knee” and not “forgive me”
*F O R G I V E M E*
I kept thinking it was "Fucking Me"
I’m hoping Paladin gets some serious love next set.
so if the heal druid had hero power tanked the BIG BOY earlier he could have healed his face avoiding healing the BIG BOY which in consequence healed toast
When toast explains something then his chat asks what he just explained. Im pretty sure his chat is one of the stupidest twitch chats. Feelsbadman
His stream is probably on a delay, so the chat might be asking the questions before he makes it pointless to do so.
@@Zyroes Thats not the delay. His chat is genuinely pepega
Toast do this challenge " Deck only with new cards"
Did no one see the infinite undertaker strat ?
"When it dies put it to your deck"
"When it dies if it has more than 4 attack resummon it"
Or is it not working cause he goes to the deck anyway ?
Doesnt work, because it shuffles itself into the Deck, not a copy
@@nailikat4856 awh ok
@@yann5546 it works, i run a version of this deck with prelate, villain and undertakah. Undertakah shuffles himself into the deck yes but he also re-summons a copy of itself cause of villains deathrattle that stays on board so you'll keep shuffling more copies into deck and always re-summon one on board.
@@Novakayne27 That is not correct. The "revived" copy of Undatakah (through villain) has no deathrattles. It's "blank". Playing Prelate Paladin by myself, removed villain, added Faceless for more prelates.
Meanwhile, ironbeak owl sitting there like (:>)
Recurring villain + undatakah seems goof
The problem is that villan is REALLY slow to play for 5 mana and for a deck that already meeds a lot of ramp it is questionable whether it is worth it. With undertaker it summons a vanilla 8/5
Spellbreaker would like to join your current deck
But then it won't be the 4th worst deck xD
7:43 Why no heropower?
just like before, mc tech is a thing
i think you missed the point of this deck; the idea is not to buff the prelates; it is to buff undertaker, he gets lifesteal, gets resurrected, deals aoe whenever he dies, and gets shuffled back in the deck. this actually seems really fun; you should have tried to go for that, instead of uploading a regular prelate game; i dont have the cards for this, so i cant build it, i was hoping to see that combo here :(
the not attacking fist game is 10million iq
first*
Toast we the frick are you trespassing on someone property? This is not your home!
Finally an opponent that is not warrior
If the undertaker has two prelate deathrattles does it shuffle two into the deck?
no
Why is this being uploaded so late my starchy spy.
Glad to see toast overcome that sweaty try hard deck!
so the main combo was immortal undertaker with taunt/lifesteal?
Probably Immortal Prelate to keep the buffs and Recurring villain to have infinite Undatakah's.
@@JacobXFG You don't have infinite Undatakahs through villain. You gain one Undatakah without deathrattles on the board. Infinite Undatakah only works with Prelate (and playing it again and again and again).
Toast this deck would be better if you added consecration, removed immortal prelate, and changed class to rogue.
coming back as the clickbait titles go away, keep up with good work
toast try undatakah and dreadstead on warlock
Da Undatakah will just summon Dreadsteed.
Did the enchantments keep stacking on that legendary? Could you just keep playing it until it instantly Leper Gnomes the enemy to death?
Theoretically you could
4 of these decks, and they all use paladin
C O I N C I D E N C E ?
wat
@@TheHappyReaper yes
Is daceless manipulator better than the undertakah or it's just me?
daceless manipulator is the strongest card so yeah
Such a weird fight
Ya know toast ya need to try RNG mage or rng Hunter or anything that have High number of rng
How is 20 lucentbarks possible if they all go dormant
Toast has a math degree, okay?
In total how many times he kills the lucent bark
He's counting revived lucentbarks.
HOW LONG WILL THIS GO ON
Drinking game - take a shot each time there's said "This is not your home invader".
Good luck, have fun.
Yes
Take a shot every time Toast pronounces prelate wrong. (It's pronounced prel-it)
I've never heard anyone say it any other way than PREE-late, but I looked it up, and you're right.
I didn't realize it was pronounced that way
Itd actually pre-lit
jeez I bet you guys pronounce zealot ZEE-lawt and spell rogue as rouge, too
Either way is fine.
I just lost against that freakin Paladin deck -__-
When toast plays prelate but doesn't sing any Eminem songs...
SO MANY!
I love this seereas
why didn’t you just hit him 3:14
what i take from this is that warrior is weak against all bad decks.
Doesnt this mean that warrior is the #1 worst deck? :p
How he wins with shit cards in the deck?:
Literally never play those cards, and win anyway.
Running crystology with no 1 drops
Nice
Point of crystology is to draw asap 1-3's so you can start buffing them
@@mislavblazevic8505 But you have Call for Adventure and you can mulligan for them... so.... Crystology seems very weak. Also, it's a dead card, once you buffed your prelates.
Toast if you're looking for the worst decks.. just play f2p decks/basic
Why no hero powers the whole game??
MC tech, if MC tech was played by the Druid he could steal a prelate
I got twitched banned from toast because I said"Why not hs?" when he was playing LOL. Help?
Poisonous Ferret read the rules
makes fun of the dude for not attacking and then doesnt hero power with 4 mana :/
Honestly I don't see why this deck has such a low win rate lots of aggro matches I guess...
100% WIN RATE WORST DECKS LMAO
Why didnt he just naturalize your big minions
hehehehe, if only
Why didnt the druid copy prelate????????
@@Cerealz01killer he actually did on his 2nd faceless but I think he just really wanted to set up 4 Lucentbarks, and he did burn his floop which probably cost him the game
2 Brocken Decks
When you realise shadowcloak has the worst decks in the meta
draw ... a Bill Cosby
Can u Try too make the bad decks work and make IT inte a series?
This is not your home....
hi
it's pronounced PREH-LET
cant watch him with that haircut
prell-et
Why does no one use carpet with the prelates
Because carpet affects 1 cost minions and prelate costs 2 . . .
Lmao
Not gonna lie, but I learn more from toast then I have in college so far
You should maybe pay more attention in college
i'm gonna pre...late
tHiS iS nOt yOUr hOmE INvADeR!
Is this deck THAT bad?
Yes.
One silence is enough to destory it.
We just havent reached the time when people put tech cards in their decks.
I like toast videos but sometimes he is just very toxic bming his oponent and laughing to he.
Immortal prelate: Fok iz dis (the actual line, when attacks)
Kewl
Nico nico I'm fucking early nee
I hate when toast doesn't attack for no apparent reason. It's just disrespectful.
Sometimes it's better to not attack.
It's so the druid can't heal himself
Biemann Luca He still could have attacked with the 3/5.
ey
Nobody:
Me: Is ThAt A 1-0???