Buy APSC NOT FULLFRAME Camera... Here's Why + New Sony Lenses 🙌🏻
Вставка
- Опубліковано 31 тра 2022
- MY NEW PODCAST! - / @mattihaapojapodcast
🔥 📸 COLOR GRADED USING NEW CINE SONY LUTS 📸🔥 = bit.ly/CineSonyLUTs
BEST PLACE TO GET MUSIC FOR ALL FILMMAKERS (FREE TRIAL) - bit.ly/2sdiLrH
MY CINEMATIC LIGHTROOM PRESETS - bit.ly/2WGjdcT
MAKE YOUR AUDIO SOUND CRISP (PRESETS FOR PREMIERE + FCPX) - bit.ly/3fKrPY3
BEST AFFORDABLE STOCK FOOTAGE + 2 FREE MONTHS 📸 - bit.ly/artgridMatti OVER 700,000 VFX / MOTION GRAPHIC ASSETS🙏🏻 📸 - bit.ly/mattimotionarray
FASTEST ANIMATED TITLES EVER FOR PREMIERE - bit.ly/2SLtZy8
EASY, FAST MOTION GRAPHICS FOR YOU - goo.gl/FdPsDN
MUSIC PERFECT FOR CLIENT VIDEOS (2 MONTHS FREE) - bit.ly/35ecucU
GET YOUR MATTI MERCH - bit.ly/32l5EED
BUSINESS INQUIRIES ONLY - CONTACTMATTIH@GMAIL.COM
COURSES!
CINEMATIC COLOR GRADING COURSE - goo.gl/xdU89z
WEDDING COURSE - goo.gl/vxeDX8
EARN 6 FIGURES MAKING FILMS COURSE - goo.gl/SNovVt
MY GEAR THAT I USE ↓↓↓
BEST VLOGGING CAMERA IN 20221 - geni.us/B8oh1wm
MY ALL TIME FAV VLOGGING LENS - geni.us/GVm0an
MY BEAST STUDIO/DOC CAMERA - bhpho.to/39r3vbn
BEST GIMBAL OUT THERE - geni.us/R4u1
MY GO TO VARIABLE ND's - geni.us/WegKgS
GREAT LOW LIGHT LENS - geni.us/iLEkS
ABSOLUTE FAVORITE DRONE - geni.us/bMGzlf
TINY AFFORDABLE DRONE - geni.us/ldy7
BEST VLOGGING MIC - geni.us/t2DBNA
PERFECT TRAVELLING TRIPOD - geni.us/9wu7
BEST LIGHT FOR UA-cam - geni.us/S5wLH
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
IF YOU WANT TO SEND SOMETHING
Suite 276
12-16715 Yonge St
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
L3X 1X4
MY SOCIALS
INSTAGRAM - goo.gl/nz245Z
TWITTER - goo.gl/G3J5nS - Фільми й анімація
Who is team APSC and who’s FULLFRAME and why? 😊
Team APS-C for Wildlife 😀
APSC atw!!....due to budget limits... >_
Right now I am APSC but I will be FULL FRAME SOON
Team apsc, Matti please sponsor me with a 9mm laowa 2.8 sony E. It will help me support my fam. #Sony #a6500
Price 😉
I get that these lenses are new and all but they're really not that revolutionary. We've already had tons of APSC lens options for Sony for ages. The 15mm f1.4 is w/e since you've got the Sigma 16mm f1.4. The new 10-20 is also kind of meh, especially at f4, because you've already got the Tamron 11-20 f2.8 available. If the prices you mentioned are final I'd say these Sony lenses are nothing special, maybe the 11mm f1.8 is a bit different, but still. It's definitely not like they're the thing that's gonna "save" APSC, because it doesn't need saving. Regardless of what people online may say APSC is, and will continue being a perfectly usable platform for A LOT of people, especially Sony APSC.
I think these will be fantastic for backpackers, because most of the big sensor hikers deploy Sony APS-C and this is exactly the type of glass they need.
Sony is basically trying to kill 3rd party lenses
Your spitting bro
I agree with you on this. Though Im super glad Sony is giving us the Signal, that apsc will still be further supported in future, cause I wasnt sure about that in the past.
Sony 10-20 180g instead of 350g for the Tamron is pretty impressive, 10 instead of 11mm is pretty interesting too, but I need tht f2.8 because with the Tamron you could defintly do astro, where as I wouldnt say f4 would be enough for astro. The 11mm 1.8 is interesting too, but the Samyang 12mm is half the price, same goes for the Sigma 16mm 1.4 which is half of the price of the Sigma 16mm, though the Sony weighs half of the Sigma.
My conclusion: In terms of size and weight compared to the incredible performance (sharpness and focusbreathing) these lenses are defintly quite revolutionary.
But for price/performance these are not at all interesting unless they signifcantly drop in price.
The zoom doesn't change in length which is good for gimbal users meaning no constant rebalancing
I've had my camera for 10 years before I started considering an upgrade for obvious reasons. Yet I was always able to acomplish what I wanted using basic equipment. You don't need 300 different lenses and 50 different cameras. Do some research, get what you want then go out and get results. Before you know it, success will be there waiting for you to take.
Don't, you will get looted.
@@raremilindchitale Scammers are everywhere
@@DelsquarePhotovideo How you mean???
@@ulrohermit1369 I mean just get what you want and not stuff based on influencers. If you are asking about the "scammers" reply, there are people asking for your telegram to scam you. The guy got reported and deleted.
@@DelsquarePhotovideo i'm just new to all this , I'm considering to buy this Sony ZV-E10 for cinematography and photography , but how do they want to scam people on telegram ,do they just ask people to lend them their gear , I don't get it
I get that this is a review for new Sony lenses, and it’s great that they’re starting to invest in APS-C more, but it sounds like you’re not aware of just how broadly Fujifilm has covered APS-C cameras and lenses for years now, in a professional way. So when you talk about APS-C image quality not being as good as full frame, that may apply to Sony but it’s a different story with Fujifilm. It just feels funny to have been shooting Fuji for 7 years now and all of a sudden the UA-camrs are like “wow APS-C!” once Sony does 1/5 of the work Fuji’s been doing the whole time.
Wrong
So true! They're like omg Aps-c can be great, did you the lenses are light weight? And I am like yes thats what I was saying all along when all the youtuber thought Full frame was the only way
Yup. My xt4 performs incredibly and the comparisons to an A7iii for video is negligible. Not to mention Fuji and sigma are producing even more lenses for x mount lenses.
I don’t think Fuji is as good as a full frame Sony. It just isn’t. I’ve owned 4 fuji cameras and still shoot with a xpro2 and have been shooting Fuji for 6 years. Whilst doing research on the xh2s, I’ve took notice of the Sony system and honestly, I’m blown away. So much so that I’ve already been on the phone with adorama about selling all my Fuji gear and buying into Sony.
Sony is biased to FF because it's lucrative. While in reality, most people don't need FF. Marketing power is amazing.
Hey Matti sweet video! Just wanna let you know that the crop factor is actually 1.5x on Sonys APS-C cameras and not 1.6x like Canons.
1.53x actually
careful of scammers
I film all my camping trips for my Camping and Outdoors channel and I have been using the Sony a6400 for all my videos. The quality is decent, shoots 4K 24fps, the lenses are cheaper and lighter and my overall setup is nice and small which is perfect for when you are camping. These new lens look great! Thanks for the video.
APSC is a fantastic format for vlogging especially. For taking *photographs* I prefer a bigger sensor, but of course the weight and cost is a choice against the potential image quality.
I think it is funny that a while back they were comparing the iPhone 13 Pro with full frame cameras and “you could hardly see a difference” and now they tell you that the smaller APSC sensor (which is huge when compared to smartphones) doesn’t have the quality of these full frame sensors.. 🤣
The speech varies depending on the topic for sure 😅 one thing doesn't change though, it is how much a tiny camera makes Matti laugh. Anything not full frame is tiny therefore extremely funny somehow 🤣
What brain dead compare iphone for fullframe 😂
There are already a bunch of great APS-C lenses for Sony cameras from Tamron and Sigma. And I'd personally prefer them over these ones from Sony. E.g. Tamron 11-20 f2.8 has much better value than Sony f4 10-20
Totally! Wrote the same in another comment 😁 But I know that 1mm of wider range could be the biggest thing for some people.
Also, Tamron 11-20mm is a lot bigger for that f/2.8 aperture
@@sleepless51 not by a lot a lot, still lighter than any full frame counterpart 😜
The size makes it better
Camera UA-camrs be like “You don’t need full frame, buy APSC!….
Who, me? No of course I’m not, FF all day for me obviously, I want it to look good”
the oldest most redundant fake issue in photography...and we wonder why people just use phones instead..
And Arri just dropped their new camera with a Super 35 sensor. Who needs FF?
Switched from Sony FF to Fujifilm APS-C and it would require something truly revolutionary to get me to go back.
This is the best advice for 95% of creators or regular consumers. Years back I've had A6500 with several lenses along with one of those first smaller zhiyun crane gimbals and that was the best travel setup. Spent a ton of cash to upgrade to full frame and on gmaster lenses and it became so cumbersome to shoot and travel with. Sometimes I just don't feel like using it because its too big to carry.
95% of creators.....no you got that wrong. I would recommend crop/small camera systems to noobies only. Literally noobies. It's NOT worth doing that small camera for creators that will be learning rather quickly. It's better to get a bigger toolbox when you are invested in creating. The learning curve will catch up to the bigger better features and capabilities.
@@purvue sounds good on paper till you're 3 miles into a hike with 10-20 lbs of other gear lol. also crop can have its benefits for wildlife and sports
@@KevinNordstrom i live in hawaii. Plenty of hikes to know that i never wrote that down till now. So its not just "good on paper"
Good video Matti! I think it's a valid idea and there are good clear advantages of APSC and you had some good points but you don't need to force every single point by not sticking with apples vs apples. For example when you showed the size difference and you compared the prices you put the f2.8 Canon zoom in the argument. It would be more apples to apples to bring the f4 zoom which is way way cheaper. And a few other points which seems a little forced or exaggerated. But the main idea is totally right and valid. I'm using 2 Canon M6 mk2s and a bunch of EF-M lenses in parallel with all my full frame gear for all the reasons you also presented.
I'd love to see you do a comparison vid between these new lenses on APS-C and a similar full-frame setup with equivalent value/performance lenses - showing video and photo quality, and actually pointing out differences in quality of the video/photo (even if nobody would notice without zooming in, or looking really closely) would be super cool to see what the cost and size difference actually does for quality of video/photo. Personally, I shoot night sky/landscape scenes with my a6000 and Sigma 16mm f/1.4 and I chose this setup due to price/performance ratio and based on the fact that I don't make money doing this - it's just a hobby for me.
I would LOVE to see Sony make a full frame lens that’s something along the lines of 16-70mm f2.8 Lens. There’s so many 24-70 but I usually find that 24 is just a smidge too tight to vlog handheld (maybe it’s because I’m 5’2”…) but I’d love to get a huge zoom range with a wide aperture!
Sigma also has an excellent assortment of Sony lenses specifically designed for APSC. The 30mm f/1.4 is one of my all time favorite lenses, period. The value proposition is dope.
are you able to shoot professionally with a apsc camera ?
@@Moresco24 I filmed 3 Years with a6300 with decent lighting nobody could tell difference between a6300 and a7iii
@@Moresco24 Definitely! There's nothing inherently magic about full-frame. Some of the most popular cinema cameras are super 35, which is pretty much identical in size to APSC (eg, Blackmagic Ursa, RED Komodo, etc.). The only thing to be aware of among *consumer* APSC cameras is that they often only shoot 8-bit video, which doesn't handle LOG formats or heavy color grading well. In my opinion, your sensor size has nothing to do with whether it can be used professionally -- what's relevant is, do you have a consumer camera or a professional camera? The aforementioned Ursa and Komodo cameras are both ~$6k USD, both crop frame, and both professional.
Sony just came out with the FX30 (basically an APSC FX3) and for $1,600 USD it's a fantastic value; also definitely suitable for professional production environments. Sorry for the long reply but hopefully this is helpful lol
@@OSKVIDCreativemedia Nice! As I'm sure you know, that's because they're pretty much the same camera with different sized sensors. Both are 8-bit Sony sensors, both 24MP, etc. The smaller size of the 6300's sensor only makes a meaningful difference in low light or for very shallow depth of field scenarios. Btw, checked out your channel and your work is impressive. 💪
@@phalanxfilmco Thank you, yes, they are almost the same . Thank you alot for kind words
These Sony apsc lenses are actually quite expensive and not much lighter compared to FF equivalent:
Canon RF 16 f/2.8 ($300) [170g]
Samyang 24 f/1.8 ($450) [230g]
Sony pz 16-35 f/4 ($1200) [380g]
Sigma 16-28 f/2.8 ($900) [450g]
And third-party options are a lot more price-competitive:
Tamron 11-20 f/2.8 ($800)
Samyang 12 f/2 ($350)
Sigma 16 f/1.4 ($400) or Viltrox 13 f/1.4 ($430)
Are you joking? Its a huge difference when you add more equipment, lights, tripod, laptop, clothes etc specially if you are travelling far, every gram count.
@@chromaticvisuelle he is talking about price! If take 3rd party lenses into consideration, aps-c lenses are not far cheaper you fool!
That's why I love my Fujifilm x-t4! The set up is lighter and the lenses are just amazing!
I enjoy all of your videos and appreciate you sharing your knowledge and time. I agree with you in almost every way about the full frame versus crop sensors except I believe the R7 with it's 32 megapixel sensor and the af modes of the R3 is gonna give me a lot more detail and resolution and higher quality crop-able images than my R6 with 20 megapixels. Often we're not comparing a full frame and a crop sensor camera with the same number of megapixels and other features that affect the number of keepers and image quality like low pass filters, frames per second, and pre-capture.
The B-roll looked very nice to be fair! You can tell the vlog shots weren’t as nice as usual but still very passable and looked good in my opinion 👍🏼
I have an a7iv but it’s so heavy when I vlog in the theme parks, picking up the e-10 now to add the tiny zoom (or the 11mm).
I decided to get a A6400 a couple years ago and spend the money I saved on lenses instead. I'm still waiting on Sony to finally come out with a APSC camera with 10 bit, but until then I'm really happy with my choice.
Switch to Canon,. Both the R7, and even the cheap little R10 will do 10 bit.
I used canon and then Sony Super 35 sensors for years, then moved to a BMPCC 4K (and I forget I'm filming MFT). I've invested way more in lenses than bodies over the past couple of years and they make the image more than the camera. Next camera I get will be a fuly fledged cine cam (Like an URSA Mini Pro) and it too will be s35.
The much sort after full frame, shallow DOF look (seen all too often on youtube!) isn't actually a cinematic look (if you study how Hollywood etc film makers work). It has it's place, but it's not the be all end all - depth and separation is more important than short DOF . I can get the dreamy short DOF look with nice fast glass on my BMPCC 4K but most of the time I don't opt for it anyway.
For vlogging, S35 is more than enough - the thing that puts me off the sonys that have this s35 sensor (imcludg my own) is the shutter lag.
these are actually awesome lenses! Hopefully they hold up optically. Now if we could JUST get an APSC version of the a7siii. I've been waiting for an APSC that can do 4k24/30/60/120 in 10 bit ever since I got the a6300.
thats like a7iv does all of that in apsc mode no?
@@dathofilms but the price is more expensive
There is, The A7IV
@@dathofilms not 120
@@ekphotography not 120
Hi Matti, Thank you for this video. I was watching you for a long time, not in a stalky way relax. I was looking now to buy a sony zv e10 for vlogging and for trips, to avoid carrying around the bulky DSLR I have. Your video is actually exactly what I needed. Just wanted to find out which lenses goes with the zv e10 so thank you for being straight to the point. love your channel
I agree with all the points but I still love my full frame! I couldn't go back to my 6100 for everything. I love my A7IV and the A7C!
what is the main difference between an apsc and full frame that made you switch?
if you have the money and strength for full frame,why not..
Ooh i freakin love my A7C. Wouldn't trade it for anything else, that's for sure
The A7IV is essentially a baby A1. I love it. I completely switched systems (Nikon DSLR -> Sony mirrorless) because I was so impressed by the hybrid capabilities
@@AlaraDincYT it is the size of the sensor. Has various impacts on a lot of things
I got a couple Sony zve10 for podcast and live-streaming hip hop concerts but am getting a full frame f1.8 85mm for it for these purposes. The hip hop shows are in low light and the podcasts the cams are used as pinch in shots for the two guests.
I shoot with both. The Sony a7c is my main cam and the 6400 is my secondary camera. The quality of Sony cams are insane, so aps-c will do the trick for any type of creative job.
Any modern camera will do the trick APS-C or FF if you know what you are doing.
Started with a Sony a6000. In April I "upgraded" to a Sony a7r IV. Love it, but I'm selling it! I backpack, hike, and that's mainly when I shoot. Just a hobbyist. I really miss the size. Not so much of the body, but the lenses are SO much smaller. As far as picture quality, I feel I got incredible shots with my old a6000.
I just brought zv-e10 with the 16-50mm plus 10-18mm. I will use it mostly for vloging and I also shoot Fujifilm Gfx 50s ii with 110mm for portraits. Both serve their purposes well👍🏽
I have been using the 10-18/4 for real estate work, and I HATE IT. It is super soft, old, and expensive. I almost bought the Tamron 11-20/2.8 the other day, but I saw your BTS story on IG. Glad I waited. The 10-20/4 is gonna be awesome, especially for APSC, but also for a7iv shooters looking to get that 4k60p wide angle shot. Thanks for the APSC love!
Team APS-C, but I'm rocking a sigma 16mm f1.4, just needed to pump extra light into that tiny crop sensor since I shoot low light all of the time.
I love my Sony a1. It does so much, has so many custom buttons. But the lenses are massive. I put APS-C lenses on it. Works very well.
Awesome review. This is exactly the advice I am looking for as I am focused towards APS-C cameras.
Love the video, would love to see about a simple clogging workflow with a simple picture profile like half for quick turnaround vlogs
I knew all too well this was click bait-ish before the video even started. I have had Canon, Fuji, and most recently Sony. For anyone wanting to go APS-C, I would seriously consider Fuji over any other brand.
Do you recommend these APSC lenses for the A7IV to be used in Super35 video mode for 4K 60? The 10-20mm sounds perfect for that I believe.
Great video. Great lens addition. What is that jello effect? The ZV sensor? Internal stabilization? And wow that difference in colors. I would love to see those lenses on a 6600.
Again. Such a helpful video!
Also again: your titles are gorgeous 😜
this review was great!!!! Thanks for sharing
Yes loving the podcasts!
I’ve been shooting long time with MFT. Before I was shooting with Canon 5D Mark IV. Got awsum results with both. Now I’m thinking about switching to Sony. But not because of the sensor size. Olympus E-M1 Mark III has been great after Canon 5D Mark IV.
Sony full frame? Me too I've been using MFT and loved the small lenses.. but when I saw pictures from a friend's full frame, I was drooling on the images. I kind of felt my MFT was missing something. I want to go to sony full frame.
@@bleu4917200 Just dumped the Olympus E-M1 Mark III and switched to the Sony a7 III & Loving it!
Splendid review, thank you!👍
7:56 lol I love how "now is the time to get one" is still something they say.....as if they weren't all sold out 😂
I would be more into the Sony APS-C cameras if they had the same capabilities, like basically if there was an APS-C version of the A7SIII
FUJIFILM just released the XHS2 that has very similar capabilities to the a7siii and it’s a crop sensor
And lenses that matched the aperture. And decent low light performance.
but what’s with the Canon ff body instead of sony ff body for the thumbnail?
Did you grade the ZVE10 footage or did you use a color profile? It looks a lot different than your usual grade.
Does the rear element move during focus or zoom in the Sony E PZ 10-20mm F4 G lens?
Have you consider to use M43 lenses e.g. with Olympus/OM or Lumix to get probably even smaller gear?
What is best lens for sony a6400 for vlogging and filmmaking for UA-cam.
But the big question; does the 10-20mm work on fullframe like the old 10-18mm does? How does it compare?
Not sure if you can compare a full frame f2.8 lens with an APS-C f4 lens (equivalent to f6.12 which is more than 3 stops slower). Still nice to have a small ultra-wide zoom lens.
Also stabilization seems weak on that camera-lens combination. The ZV-E10 doesn't even have proper IBIS, does it?
Nope it doesn't. The best you can get out of it if you record with 1/200 and push the footage through catalyst browse. 500% more time to get your footage even usable for editing..
Speaking of cool ASP-C cameras, with Magic Lantern the canon eos M records 4K 10-bit raw 18 MP sensor and runs about $200, or $280 with additional adapter and retro nifty fifty lens! (pretty cool little setup if you want to save your money for trying a lot of different lenses, and no tears if I break it on my long distance bicycle tours, so perfect setup for me!).
Although that Sony Zv e 10 does look pretty dope I must admit.
As someone who went from the a6000 to the A7iii, there is no way I'm going back to apsc, they're great and they get the job done but if I'm worried about size I'd rather have a point and shoot like the zv1
Zv1 is pretty limiting. If you already have e mount always go for zv e10 imo. Plus, Zv1 has an even smaller sensor. Making it useless indoors when there's little light. Let alone low light. It's like a good phone camera with variable ND a s optical zoom.
@@kooistradurk i think you missed the point of my comment. If I'm gonna use a small sensor I'd rather have a small camera. The zv1 is more than capable. If i have to lug around a big exchangeable lense camera, i might as well just have my full frame which is FAR superior
@@Ataraxia_Atom I get the point of form factor. There's plenty of fun small apsc lenses tho. Obviously the ZV-1 is better than a phone, but for me the difference between a phone and the Zv1 is not big enough. I've owned both zv1 zv e10, sold the Zv1 still own zv e10. I also have an a7iii, I share your experience going full frame ;) but also the fun a small prime lens gives me in my pocket.
@@kooistradurk gotcha, yeah i think it could go either way. I've only played with the ZVE10 at the store, but similar enough to the A6000 that imo was too big to stuff in my pocket. I do have the ZV1 and enjoy the all in one point and shoot. I haven't tried those pancake primes though, that would prob be the best for something pocketable with the E10, but for me I'd rather have the zoom in the ZV1
@@Ataraxia_Atom Yup, the bokeh and low light on pancake primes are a lot of fun in such a small form factor. But yeah, it's just down to preference in the end.
Lmaoooo at the thumbnail, thank you for making me smile 😃
this was dope!
Now that they have released the FX30, I think this video is even more important!! Great job.
As soon as you add a dead cat on top of a camera, it really doesn’t matter it’s size. I wouldn’t be able to tell if someone was holding a full frame or APSC, but I would always notice the mic. If these companies can make a good internal audio solution I would buy.
Im using the 11m f.18 lens and it is AWESOME!
How is the 10-20mm on full frame? any crop needed?
Does the PZ reset every time you power on or wake the camera or it stays where it was left last??? It's the most annoying thing with the other PZ lens from Sony
What do you suggest for ZV-E10 ? Tamron 11-20 f/2.8 vs Sony 10-20 f/4 ???
When I see these coming out on Sony it makes me feel sad the Canon EOSM line was so neglected and discontinued. The M6 Mark II is such a sleeper and the M mount is so compact. Sigma made some great lenses for it too.
I sold my M6 for the ZV-E10 last year for the same reason 😢
I would still buy one tbh. Nothing beats the size.
and the new R7 and R10 will be superior to any Sony APS-C currently on the market,. So there's that
Matti!! Would you recommend Sony 16-55mm instead over all if funds are available?
The rolling shutter on the zv-e10 makes me give up on buying it. Fuji XS-10 seems to me to be a better option in APSC sensors.
When you compare Sonys APS-C and +30mpix FF bodies, the image quality isn't that far off. It's just time for a new generation APS-C sensor at Sony. By the way 1.6x ist the Canon APS-C crop, Sony has a real APS-C with 1.5x. :)
You are absolutely correct! One would really need to LEAN IN to a computer screen to POSSIBLY spot the difference. The Sony APS-C line is MORE than capable of producing high quality images. Great comment! 👍
Spotting the difference in pixel counting is somewhat idiotic it's about the exposure, color and dynamics capabilities out of the raws
@@purvue ?
@@Benjamin_Jehne people say the image isn't that far off untill you need to produce a very demanding and creative visual with color accuracy with existing marketing campaigns (for example). Smaller pixel sensors is ok if that's all you got but choosing crop over full-frame...thats a negative for me. Eyes need to be trained on what to look for (and I don't just mean technical stuff). I am not choosing the crop sensor camera in this video over something like my Nikon z7ii. It's idiotic. Aps-c should just be compared to other aps-c maybe micro four thirds. Some photographers are image quality over portability. I would also socratically challenge the notion that a certain camera in the great photographers hand is fine, and I would argue why not let the great photographer also have a great camera sensor. Example a great driver will drive a Geo Prism like it has never been driven before but that's the Geo Prism being maxed out at a lower limit of performance, that is not the driver performing at HIS ultimate limit. Now give that same great driver the best car and see what his ultimate is. Tools should not be the limit. They should magnifier. When people watch a legendary drift racer do his thung. They are enjoying the performance and not the specs. Technical focus is paradoxically irrelevant to the appreciation of the end result. Usually the end result is judged on its own. So shouldn't care if it's 1.5x or 1.6x unless (hence the paradox) it doesn't matter unless a specific measured and planned shot is need. Technical details fall inline more with the planning of a shot due to whatever technical limits are there, but using specs as a way of validating end result impact.
@Benjamin Jehne I saw some of your photos on your UA-cam channel! Great work! 🙏🏾 😀
I feel like third party lens manufacturers make better alternatives to these lenses and some for less even (Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8, the legendary Sigma 16mm f/1.4 and I believe Samyang or Rokinon makes a wide aperture 12mm). But then you can grab something like an Sony A7C that’s full frame but with the size of an APS-C body with the very reasonably priced and lightweight f/2.8 zoom pairs from Tamron and now Sigma with their recent release of the 16-28mm f/2.8 to pair with their 28-70mm f2.8. If Sony makes(and I’m keeping my fingers crossed here) a APSC camera that has 4k 24/30/60 with 10 bit, a new crop sensor, fully articulating touch screen and included the new menu these lenses would be game changing for sure
I have a Canon SL3 and I'm looking to jump to a mirrorless camera. To do that I would be spending $1000 at minimum (for a let's say Sony A6400 or a Canon EOS R10). However, for only $1300 I can get a Canon EOS R, which is full-frame. Would you say that I may as well go for the R?
Body isn't the most expensive part. It's the lenses. Full frame lenses can be much heavier and more expensive. And don't go for Canon RF mount as they have banned 3rd party lenses which will force you to buy hugely overpriced lenses.
@@wilder6408 they have some nice cheap and small lenses tho (RF 50mm 1.8, 35mm 1.8, etc.)
Could you please show how ZVE10 perform in the night time shooting? Thanks always.
Thanks for this. I’m looking into the Sony A6400 and these affordable lenses will help
Bought Canon M6 mark ii couple of years ago. Cant afford to upgrade so trying to get the best out of the sensor before some day figure out the YT and have the money for full frame. Good vid Matti!
can we shoot professional weddings photo and video with something like an fx30 and these lenses?
I have the a6400 and the a7R ii. I love them both. Each does certain things well. The a7r ii is a classic camera and is not really that expensive any more. APS-C and FF. Get both. You chose. Resistance is futile.
Cool purple sky you got there with the apsc camera
how is the lack of IS/OSS on these lens affect vlogging, especially like on the one-wheel.. i seems to notice quite a bit of wobbling in the footage (after stabilization in post i assume?) and are you just stabilize in the editing tool or using the gyro data with sony apps ?
Revisited this video in 2024. ZV E II is now out, but i think im going to go for ZV E I as a beginner youtuber. I noticed in this video that the 11m f1.8 looks better (sharper, better colors in the park scene) than the 10-20 zoom lens I'll mainly be using the camera at my home office (a small bedroom lit with studio lights) to shoot productivity videos. Should i go for the fixed lens? Thank you.
I've always used aps-c cameras and I love them!
Can you put 10-20 lens on A7iv and shoot 4k60 and compare to 16-35 4k30 ?
i think this APSc lens can be good solution for super 35 crop when you swich to 60fps
7:28 - It's so cool Sony gave you the lenses 2 years ago. It's even cooler you managed to keep them a secret for that long.
I’d get the 11mm 1.8, already got the sigma 16mm 1.4 which is fantastic, wish there was a 70-200 2.8 equivalent for apsc
Does the 10-20 work on full frame like the 10-18 did?
No It doens't work with new 10-20.
Anyone know the name of the song playing during the Broll on the One Wheel?
Hi! What do you usually recommend for stabilization to make videos with the Sony ZVe10? Do you use only lens stabilization or do you use the Sony catalyst browse program? The Sony has poor (electronic) stabilization but is small and light. I've looked around but there aren't many lightweight video cameras with stabilized APSC sensor. I was looking for a lightweight travel solution that isn't full frame or micro four thirds.
a smal ronin gimbal is a must on this camera , the stabilization is horrible but other than that I would think it's good for 2k and 1080p filming compared to anything that is out there
My line of cameras has been Sony RX100III, a6000, RX100V and now the a7iii. I’ve been thinking of moving to Fuji with the XT4 or Olympus with the EM1 iii. I’m on many sites Instagram, Facebook and Flickr and I’ve come to the conclusion that it really doesn’t matter what size sensor your packing. I’ve seen mediocre images taken with FF and exceptional images taken with M4/3. When it comes down to weight, cost and size then you truly start seeing the difference
Do/did you use Catalyst Browse to stabilize the ZVE10 footage or something? I noticed a lot of warp on the edges when you were doing the handheld test footage. I typically turn off stabilization in the camera and use CB, but wondering what your thoughts are...
The rolling shutter on that camera is horriblie! Can’t believe sony marketed this as a vlogging camera!
Hi Matti, love your videos, but I have a proposal,, for ex. on 4:57 - when you write txt in the bottom right corner, I need to stop the video to see what is written (because it fade away too fast), and second thing - when I stop the video, the txt is covered by the youtube video icons (subs, playback quality...) so is hard to read. btw learned a lot from you and Peter ;)
So still feel the same now with the FX30?
hi I got the 10-18 and i use it on my a7s3...it has NO vignette at 12 and higher.... could you check the 10-20 on a FF? thanks
Love that classic hat - Go Pack Go! (And hello from Wisconsin!)
Wilderness explorer dream lenses. I can see these mounted to canoes all over northern Canada. Hoping to have one mounted to my canoe by the end of the year. :)
bruh. where df do i get these lenses? can only find the 15mm on amazon
I am so happy with my a7c :) it's a fullframe camera, but small!
I share your thoughts Matti, but as a side note: the Sony ZV-E10 is currently not available due to chip shortages. Couldn't find it on stock anywhere for now.
6:39 is that double layer frame or is it the effect from the lenses? i wonder🤔 can someone explain??
I use APS-C cameras. I haven't had a need for a FF sensor. I do admit that I do astrophotography with my wife's FF camera, but mine does okay on it's own. I just use hers for the little boost of dynamic range.
You didn't check the 10-20 on the a7SIII, why? You once showed how amazing the old 10-18 works at 12mm with a bit of active stabilization crop... This new 10-20 could be THE most compact FF (casual) vlogging lens!
these are apsc lenses. on full frame its gonna be 15-27 and lower res. youre gonna get like 7megapixel image quality on the a7s3.
Thoughts on the new Canon EOS R7 & R10?
Hey Matti can you compare the sony a6600 with this new lens (10-20mm) vs the A7sIII with 16-35mm. Great video!
Yess
Hi there sir matt im john from the philippines and your videos are very helpfull and entertaining. I just want to know your opinion. I am a aspiring photographer and im planning to buy sony a6600 and sony e15mm f1.4. Do you think its a great combo for photography and videography?
Thanks for a great channel, just managed to get my hands on the ZV-E10 but body only cause the kit was sold out. My intention is to use it for travel/daily/run and gun/b-roll/snapshot camera that I'm not too afraid to carry around. I was thinking of a pancake but the 20mm f2.8 doesn't seem to perform much better than the kit? I'm intending to get the 18-105 for more specific shots and filming but when it comes to a smaller lens I want to have something that I can bring the camera with me daily. What would you guys suggest? Size matters a lot for me and the smaller the better, but still give some quality shots. I know I'm asking for a lot but hoping to get some ideas ofthe closest option..
sigma 18-55 f2.8 is really small and great all around lens for sony apsc
@@ximamax thanks for for the tip, it seems like a great lens but it's about 5 times longer than my Canon 40mm 2.8 pancake I've been running for years. Just turned to Sony and was hoping to find something similar for a pocket sized camera point and shoot combo. Bokeh is not soo much of importance with my daily pocket camera, mostly stills of landscapes and buildings during daylight, and then I'll bring the 18-105 (or this Sigma!) with me when I need a zoom and fixed aperture for more specific shots. Maybe I'll survive with the Sony 20mm 2.8 if I stay around f8 all day and the corners will be somewhat sharp? Thanks again!