@@brookshamilton1 Chris Dixon's book really explained the restrictions on our networks. Marc's internet ideal was more of an open protocol, now social media are closed networks that controls ownership, profits, and visibility.
Great episode. And I support the American Dream platform! I am eager to contribute to the reform of current education system… so many waste here, time, talents, dreams and potentials
Incredible content! Thank you so much for putting this out there - curious how you all think about how AI will influence the U.S. defense industry and the military industrial complex? Will AI and corresponding policies increase or reduce barriers of entry for defense startups?
I'm just learning about all this so likely missed something but am curious how existing databases that are behind paywalls, such as documents in the California court system would handle AI. Right now you need to pay (a small amount) to even search for a legal document or obtain a case number. And more money is required to see the entire document. If AI is let loose on court documents (which would be amazing) would the government get paid by the A1 companies? And the public would get the information for free?
I agreed with Marc that the regulations of what is illegal are already on the books. It's like you don't need a law saying that it is unlawful to use knives to attack people
The American Dream platform is excellent. It's the same objectives as Ezra Klein's Supply Side Progressivism. I'm open to a mixed-economy approach to solving the core cost issues of Healthcare, Housing, and Education, with a big lean towards opening it up for the market to solve problems.
Dos a16z have any formal thoughts or thesis on bittensor? Seems like the preeminent early platform for decentralized AI via their subnets. Exciting level of VC activity beginning to flourish there
I don't mean this in a disrespectful way: The idea that a problem that is caused by a new technology (deep fakes), will be solved by a different technolgy (block chains) seems wrong to me. It looks like the externalization of the costs these companies cause. It's like a16z would fund both: a fossil fuel company and a carbon extraction startup. It's not surprising, if people are becoming more and more cynical, when they are asked again to pay for the solution of a problem they did not cause.
@@AlexanderBachmann yup I get what you’re thinking but I don’t think it’s reality 99% of the time and it doesn’t move us toward a solution. Look for the root cause and call that thing “wrong.” Then we can look for solutions.
Ill be sure to mention to King Leopold's desendants how much you admiref his use of cutting edge trchnology when he masssacred half the population of Congo. Lolol
Marc's manifesto is self-contradictory. It cites F.A. Hayek's "knowledge problem" as the reason why central economic planning is allegedly impossible, but then it argues that advanced AI's can perform all kinds of miracles. As in, AI's can turn us into immortal superhumans and enable us to colonize the rest of the universe. But solve the knowledge problem? Why, that's just a childish utopian fantasy!
Why do you keep making these same boomer political videos over and over . You guys are capable of making much better content “A.I regulation is bad , we need to be optimistic about technology 👴” Duh…. The majority of your YT audience is already pro-tech so you’re just preaching to the choir You guys have brilliant people like Andrew Chen & Olivia Moore who have a wealth of knowledge/insights in sectors like Consumer & A.I and I’d really like to know more about these types of things Unlike political things that we don’t have any agency over (unless you’re a mega rich person)
Non partisan. Yeah right. Most wealthy and more than most tech people are, by and large, hard left. This is also followed by "rules for thee but not for me" and "NIMBY".
@@conall5434 there's no point to argue. Look at the major urban centers of the country; chief among them; silicon valley, LA, Chicago, DC, and NYC. The darkest of blues. Now, of course, they don't live according to their politics, see my earlier comment, but they espouse, vote, and donate accordingly.
@@conall5434 I mean he doesn't seem wrong if we assume wealthy people are in the elite, or adjacent to the elite then we find that it's reasonable that they are at the very least on the left. Most of the US wealth is located along the coast--coastal elites or the wealth is concentrated in cities and then cities vote overwhelmingly to the left. At the very least most tech-wealthy people are on the left (as Marc/Ben pointed out at the big tech which pays large salaries to wealthy people is overwhelmingly on the left). Obviously this comes down to how you define "wealthy" but if you just use the simple heuristic of wealth as a proxy for status then most wealthy people are somehow affiliated with the elites and those groups do not at all intersect with the republican party. But I assume we're just arguing over definitions.
I agreed with Marc that the regulations of what is illegal are already on the books. It's like you don't need a law saying that it is unlawful to use knives to attack people
you know shit about to go down when marc is rocking the hat
😂😂😂😂😂
It's cool that Marc can be on the Meta board and still speak up against their opportunity to consolidate power in SF/U.S.
I believe he said anti-big tech, which really left me confused considering the hand they had in creating and funding a large part of it.
@@brookshamilton1 Chris Dixon's book really explained the restrictions on our networks. Marc's internet ideal was more of an open protocol, now social media are closed networks that controls ownership, profits, and visibility.
@@Eggs-n-Jakey Good recommendation. Appreciate that. I'll give it a read.
@@brookshamilton1 ya it's "Read, Write, Own" good little history lesson as well. Good read all around.
Also it's hard to watch when they look straight at the camera lmao
Is Marc auditioning for the next season of Peaky Blinders?
Great video by the way.
Great discussion...
A very good articulation of two people talking their book. Cheers.
This is my favorite infomercial of the year.
this >>> all in podcast
I mean. Marc is far more interesting with his ideas and articulates them in much more compelling ways
I don't know if that is only me, but I agree with Marc Andreessen 100% on everything. Scary. I thought I was a unique human being
Are you a bot
He's just that persuasive
Great episode. And I support the American Dream platform! I am eager to contribute to the reform of current education system… so many waste here, time, talents, dreams and potentials
I am so grateful that you guys are helping influence American politics for the better. Please keep it up. Thank you.
la creme de la creme !!! best tech podcast
Incredible content! Thank you so much for putting this out there - curious how you all think about how AI will influence the U.S. defense industry and the military industrial complex? Will AI and corresponding policies increase or reduce barriers of entry for defense startups?
I'm just learning about all this so likely missed something but am curious how existing databases that are behind paywalls, such as documents in the California court system would handle AI.
Right now you need to pay (a small amount) to even search for a legal document or obtain a case number. And more money is required to see the entire document.
If AI is let loose on court documents (which would be amazing) would the government get paid by the A1 companies? And the public would get the information for free?
The AI companies are not paying the data providers unless they explicitly "partner" with them.
I agreed with Marc that the regulations of what is illegal are already on the books. It's like you don't need a law saying that it is unlawful to use knives to attack people
The American Dream platform is excellent. It's the same objectives as Ezra Klein's Supply Side Progressivism. I'm open to a mixed-economy approach to solving the core cost issues of Healthcare, Housing, and Education, with a big lean towards opening it up for the market to solve problems.
Dos a16z have any formal thoughts or thesis on bittensor? Seems like the preeminent early platform for decentralized AI via their subnets. Exciting level of VC activity beginning to flourish there
thx
I don't mean this in a disrespectful way: The idea that a problem that is caused by a new technology (deep fakes), will be solved by a different technolgy (block chains) seems wrong to me. It looks like the externalization of the costs these companies cause. It's like a16z would fund both: a fossil fuel company and a carbon extraction startup. It's not surprising, if people are becoming more and more cynical, when they are asked again to pay for the solution of a problem they did not cause.
@AnonymousQwerty Just speaking into the void I guess
So we shouldn’t make bullet proof vests?
@@wadegerten247 interesting... But you get, what I'm trying to say.
@@AlexanderBachmann yup I get what you’re thinking but I don’t think it’s reality 99% of the time and it doesn’t move us toward a solution. Look for the root cause and call that thing “wrong.” Then we can look for solutions.
You all are calling out the monster you helped create.
how is it not obvious that the way to prevent dystopia is to hand over complete ownership of AI to * Microsoft *…
Ill be sure to mention to King Leopold's desendants how much you admiref his use of cutting edge trchnology when he masssacred half the population of Congo. Lolol
Marc's manifesto is self-contradictory. It cites F.A. Hayek's "knowledge problem" as the reason why central economic planning is allegedly impossible, but then it argues that advanced AI's can perform all kinds of miracles. As in, AI's can turn us into immortal superhumans and enable us to colonize the rest of the universe. But solve the knowledge problem? Why, that's just a childish utopian fantasy!
Marc, copyleacks actually pretty good at detection for AI generated content. Damnit 🙄
The tech company as victim podcast
Stakeholder capitalism?
Why do you keep making these same boomer political videos over and over . You guys are capable of making much better content
“A.I regulation is bad , we need to be optimistic about technology 👴”
Duh….
The majority of your YT audience is already pro-tech so you’re just preaching to the choir
You guys have brilliant people like Andrew Chen & Olivia Moore who have a wealth of knowledge/insights in sectors like Consumer & A.I and I’d really like to know more about these types of things
Unlike political things that we don’t have any agency over (unless you’re a mega rich person)
Non partisan. Yeah right. Most wealthy and more than most tech people are, by and large, hard left. This is also followed by "rules for thee but not for me" and "NIMBY".
Most wealthy people are left wing? Are you actually arguing that point?
@@conall5434 there's no point to argue. Look at the major urban centers of the country; chief among them; silicon valley, LA, Chicago, DC, and NYC. The darkest of blues. Now, of course, they don't live according to their politics, see my earlier comment, but they espouse, vote, and donate accordingly.
@@conall5434 I mean he doesn't seem wrong if we assume wealthy people are in the elite, or adjacent to the elite then we find that it's reasonable that they are at the very least on the left. Most of the US wealth is located along the coast--coastal elites or the wealth is concentrated in cities and then cities vote overwhelmingly to the left. At the very least most tech-wealthy people are on the left (as Marc/Ben pointed out at the big tech which pays large salaries to wealthy people is overwhelmingly on the left). Obviously this comes down to how you define "wealthy" but if you just use the simple heuristic of wealth as a proxy for status then most wealthy people are somehow affiliated with the elites and those groups do not at all intersect with the republican party. But I assume we're just arguing over definitions.
Didnt sillycon valley move to texas, south coast i guess
I agreed with Marc that the regulations of what is illegal are already on the books. It's like you don't need a law saying that it is unlawful to use knives to attack people
1.7B and still whining about taxes being to high seems vapid and where marc falls on his face sadly