SovCit? Unfortunate Dog #2
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 лис 2023
- Wild Court Moments
Owner Fights To Save Dog
• Owner Fights To Save Dog
New Merch
www.ltwmmerch.com/shop
Screaming Goat
amzn.to/3W3in7U
Yodeling Pickle
amzn.to/3ZzENyG
Camera
amzn.to/3fzByDF
The new microphone! (Blue Yeti)
amzn.to/3mMq6qy
streamyard.com?pal=6179087342370816
Merch law-talk-with-mike.creator-sp...
Sovereign Citizens In Court Playlist
• Sovereign Citizens In ...
Sovereign Citizens #6 - Moor Bank Fail
• Sovereign Citizens #6 ...
intro
Song: Xenogenesis
Artist: TheFatRat
Artist's channel: / thisisth. .
This commentary remix work constitutes a fair use of any copyrighted materials under section 107 of the US copyright law.
You're right. It isn't the fault of the dog. It is the fault of an owner who doesn't know what he's doing and ultimately ended up creating the dog equivalent of a sociopath.
Um, no. I mean I don't even believe in free will, but dogs are like people in that way. If any of them are responsible for anything. They all are. There is no way of knowing *how much* the owner contributed. But to pretend the dog is this 100% innoscent animal that *never* would have hurt anyone is just silly. That's not how mammals work. Any dog can bite anyone at any time. History shows it over and over and over.
And to be clear: I don't think it's their fault in reality. But we have to act like it is. As they did in this case.
The way Diata answers questions he seems like a sociopath too. WTF. And what's with the camera from 1975?
It's the fault of the woman who got bit as she didn't follow policy when feeding this dog.
@@JaneDoe-tr5xy Ah, yes … blame the woman for feeding a dog and trying to treat it like all the other dogs after the owner explicitly gave her the okay to do so. Blame her for doing the same exact feeding routine she’d been able to do with all the other animals there.
Do you realize what you’re saying? lol you’re basically admitting in a roundabout way that the dog breed is so dangerous that it can’t even be treated like other dogs, that it needs some sort of special rules to follow due to how dangerous it is … meaning it had no business being there - no business being anyone’s pet let alone in that place around any human.
You sound like the same types of wackos that call themselves “pit mommies” and nickname their pets “velvet hippos” that sit and mock and blame victims from vicious attacks, especially ones that result in death of a human or death of other small pets. It’s always the person that got bit’s fault … never the animal and the breed itself for its aggression and way it was raised.
@@JaneDoe-tr5xy That is what I don't understand. Did Diata tell them to go in despite the problems and was lying?
The women isn't on trial and ultimately the dog does seem to be dangerous so it doesn't really matter at this point, if this dog were to get out it seems to be a big risk of hurting others regardless of these specific instances.
This man should never own a dog again. It is not trained other than the owner training the dog to hate everyone except him and his wife.
That is what I was thinking..
I absolutely agree with you!
I must point out ... Debbie Davis is an animal lover too, and I fully believe that having to carry through this case hurt her heart even more than it hurt any of our hearts to see it. (Hugs to her for it.)
I don't think for one minute that Judge M enjoyed having to reach the only conclusion legally available either.
I'm sure Judge M and Ms Davis were both torn up to have to put the dog down. All of us are. But the owners created an adult dog that wasn't socialized. So sad.
The Diatas definitely need to humble themselves. This is their dog and their responsibility. They’re trying to play victim while this chick is scarred for life.
But then they wouldn't be able to sustain their victim complex!
Neither one seemed to care about the bite victims and gave the impression of, "It's your own fault!" And I don't believe the kennel handler would make up a story about being given permission by the doctor to take the dog out for walks. She admits she violated policy, and she did, but I don't think she lied about permission.
Exactly she wouldn’t tell the truth about the policy then lie about the permission
It's disgusting. Some people truly have no empathy and only care about themselves.
The kennel's policy is neither here nor there in determining that a dog is dangerous and has attacked people.
Gotta say - the worker who was attacked is such an incredible witness. Totally honest and explains things clearly.
Obviously very caring as well. She really wanted the dog to not be lonely and suffering.
She screwed up and why she got bit.
@@JaneDoe-tr5xy🤦♂️ Nope
I think the Dr needs to clean his screen🙄team skeptic calls it the “Vaseline filter”😂
😂😂😂
He is a paranoid, delusional, black supremacist.
He doesn't want people seeing anything about him and his racist ideology.
lol my phone front camera looked like that for awhile because i cracked the screen. finally got it fixed last week
As someone who has grown up with an Akita/Chow mix (both are guard dog breeds), I can say that the owner is the one fully at fault here. That dog would not have been dangerous whatsoever if he had taken the time to train him properly to not attack people or just train him properly in general. The owner wanted a dangerous dog so that's how he taught the dog to be. It pisses me off that the dog had to be put down because of the arrogant actions of a person who should never own any animals if all he wanted was one that would do nothing more than attack people. The owner should be put in jail as well for training an dangerous animal as well.
This, Absolutely! The biggest thing that pissed me off from the original case was the fact that before the neighbor was attacked for just saying hi outside of Diata's gate the dog had already gotten out before and shown aggression to others. In the original trial we had testimony that the dog liked to get out of its yard at night and wander and patrol around the area well beyond Diata's property, even to the point of staring someone down while they were just putting their garbage out. Diata knew of the issues and didn't do anything about it until after the attack that left his neighbor without the full function of her hand any more. And even then, his "solution" was to just try and put up an invisible fence around his yard and call it fine. Diata was willfully ignoring the basics of what he needed to do with a dog like an Akita because he thought he knew better than everyone else. This whole sovcit shtick is just to avoid taking responsibility and to feed in to a victim complex.
Did anyone think to check the food the owner brought the dog for any additives that shouldn't have been in the food? I wouldn't put it past an owner to to do that in order to sue the county/facility trying to make this their fault ... people do weird/horrendous things for $.
In Georgia, the dog would not have a reprieve if taught to be vicious. Jail time would definitely served.
Akitas are literally listed as a dangerous dog breed and are banned from being owned in towns and cities, and even entire states, across the country. The fact is that an Akita requires intense socialization and obedience training, as well as constant vigilance on the part of the owner, to be viable as a pet. The vast, vast majority of owners are neither cut out for, nor aware of, these absolute necessities. Very few people have any business owning such an animal - the Akita breed should be banned so this exact circumstance doesn't occur, because the dog is the one who will have to pay the price.
Some dogs are aggressive despite of training. He doesn't necessarily have to train the dog to bite. But I agree that when adopting any dog, especially a large, powerful or aggressive breed, you need to provide proper training and keep the dog out of trouble. He definitely failed there.
He is proving a chiropractor is not a doctor.
Can confirm. Chiripractors are quacks, not doctors. There is no medical efficacy whatsoever to chiropractic "medicine". You're more likely to walk out of a chiropractor's office with an injury you didn't have when you walked in than you are to have them actually fix something.
You ever notice how whenever apologists try to defend these quacks, they say: "That's not true! I've been going to my chiropractor for years for my back pain and..."
If I was going to a real doctor for the SAME ISSUE for years and I was still having to go back, that means HE'S NOT FIXING IT!
Diata has always said the dog was an akita and german shepherd mix. Now Diata said the dog is purebred and intact for possible breeding purposes.
That’s right!!
Liars lie!
I remember that also.
Debbie Davis should have question the Dr. on how his previous Akita got hit by a car if he always maintains control of his dogs.
Where were you during the hearing?!? Obviously not sending me “brain waves” to help with my questions 🤣
@@DebbieDavissaid
I think you do a great job.
@@DebbieDavissaid I picked up what you were laying down when you asked if his previous dog was spayed/neutered- one of the biggest reasons to do that is to prevent wandering which helps prevent dogs getting hit by cars
Hey all, at about 10:15 AM EST, NOV 30, 2023, a SOV-CIT came into the Georgia courthouse I work at and it was everything you could imagine. It was painful! He lectured straight from a SOV-CIT bible. I'm going to have nightmares about it!!
I live in a province that is invoking a sovereignty act to avoid paying federal tax on climate change or something like that
No video? Dangit! We would’ve loved it!!! 😂
Ohh lord lol which courthouse in GA? I’m curious to know if it’s close to me bc that would be hilarious 😂
@@southernladyish I prefer not to put that info on here.
@OneBadAssMoMo There is video. This office has security cameras and microphones, but I don't have access to it.
After the live stream, I went over and looked at the photos. Not a doctor and don't play one on tv, but I wanted to see the damage for myself. The wounds had clean edges so the doctors were able to get them closed up. The scars don't look too bad considering all the stitches and she has a plastic surgeon on the case. I wonder if she will be able to do her job after the trauma. So sad. I feel sorry for the dog. He never stood a chance. Improper training, encouraged to be aggressive, not neutered to calm his tendencies. His owner seems proud that his dog is dangerous. The longer he is kept in those stressful circumstances, the worse he will get. I'm going to go love on my teeny doxie now.
He injured somebody else more severely before this woman hence why he was in the dog facility
Doesnt really matter if a plastic surgeon can make her face and arm look a little better. Its the fact the dog is unpredictable and cant be out in public. Im an animal lover too. But akitas are known to be this way. especially if they are not properly trained. She should not have to go through surgeries or the pain. And the first person should not have been attacked either. Do we give the dog a third chance to be unpredictable? That would be negligent at best. I dont think the judge or debbie like making these decisions.
@@danitheuerkauf7095I wish they could Sue Middleton for being such a poop of a judge. The dog would have been dead before this if Middleton hadn't illegally extended. The time for this idiot to play a stupid sovereign citizen bullsh. It was middleton if you had gotten better
How were you able to view them? Is there a link available by chance? Thanks in advance.
People with fragile egos and a need to appear 'macho' have dogs like this..They generally don't know or care who the dog is, just how they can be used to shore up the self image of a pitiful, pathetic person.
If Dr. Diata wanted to find a way to tick off the kindest judge I have ever seen, he found it. ROFLMAO
Sometimes I wish they'd say "sir you are now a corporate entity because by coming into the meeting without saying 'permission to come aboard' you have created joinder, permanently granted this court jurisdiction in this matter, and dissolved the billion dollar trust once kept in your name. You will now need a license to drive and a separate license to travel.
Oh man, leave it to Judge Middleton to call our their "jabberwalky nonsense..." right out the gate! 🤣🤣🤣
Love it!!😂😂😂
I have rescued many dogs and trained German Shepherds. I work with a dog behavioral consultant. Some dogs are dangerous and cannot be rehabilitated.
Pretty sure if my 10 lb poodle/shihtzu mix were that size she would fall into /that category
It's true. Particularly when they've had the misfortune to land with the wrong owner who is keeping the wrong breed for the wrong reasons, and doesn't understand the particular characteristic traits of the breed.
If Mr Diata did not fully understand that Akitas are highly-bred guard dogs that are bred for strong aggressive/defensive drive, high energy, and lack of growling/barking before attack ... if he did not understand that they are challenging dogs to raise and demand experienced, skilled, firm owners who give them expert training ...
... then he had no business owning an Akita.
They are beautiful, wonderful dogs, and I love the breed. But they are not dogs for just J Random Dog Lover. They are working dogs, bred to a particular job, and this needs to be front-and-center in any prospective owner's mind.
Akita are a dog of dominance. When she sat below dog she became prey and or a lesser creature.
@@duneflower8279You chose the dog in part for its small size, no? I’m guessing if your dog could rip your face off, you wouldn’t have adopted him.
So, apples and oranges.
@@CindyLouWho77 actually, no. She & her brother were brought in to the shelter where i was a volunteer. Brother was very sweet. She had problems, but i was not going to separate them or leave her behind. Had them for 10 years now. Love them both.
I had almost the same thing happen to me. I used to work at a vet clinic. I was broading dogs. I had an onwer where the dog comes aggressively at you if you try to get him. Once you get him away, he wasn't a bad dog. He listens to my commands. One day owner was yelling at one of the doctor and his dog got aggressive. He lose control of his dog. I quickly grab the dog's collar. His dog starts try to bite so i had to put him down. The doctor had the get the owner out so the dog can calm down. The dog finally calm down and we asked the owner to never come back until his dog is train. Three weeks later he tried to sue the vet clinic and me but he decided to drop it. If you can not train your dog, you shouldn't have one.
I'm guessing that the quack has started going full sov cit because he's getting sued by the victims at this point due to his negligence. He's probably refusing to come into the court room because he is going to get served if he shows up in person.
Ohhhhh, very good points, thanks.
From the last hearing, it boggles my mind that the owner tried to use the defence of the dog being in a kennel with sings saying "do not go near" or words to that effect. If a dog is that concerning then it absolutely has severe issues and should not be allowed back in the public at all.
Sad, but you gotta make the public safe.
ABSOLUTELY!!
Yeah, kenneling a dog with signs works out behavioral issues Fer Sure 😮
@@railmaverick It reminds me of when I worked in car insurance. More than once we'd get a car wreck that we'd have to have moved to a storage yard ASAP because of course twisted sharp hunks of metal that leak fluids can be dangerous. And sometimes they don't get picked up quickly enough and someone gets injured by it, whether just walking past or something inane like that. Guess who was responsible? Us as the insurers.
You have something that's dangerous and know it, then if things still happen, you're still responsible.
"Jabberwocky"
The dog didn't bite because the employee ignored the sign. It was the employees fault she put herself at risk by not adhering to the sign. However, the dog bit regardless of signage. Period. And will bite again
yeah, that. most dogs dont bite if you go into a kennel with them. most dogs, if they feel they might have to protect themselves, will growl, bark, raise their fur on their back & neck, back away before making a lunge, snap at the air etc. the fact that this dog didnt, and only stared at her is super scary. its seems predatory, like the dog viewed her as a valid target to attack
To me it is a dangerous sign that the dog would attack unprovoked someone the dog was familiar with. How can you keep a dog like this in your house and guarantee that is would not accidently get out of a fence or even a door?
Yes because it scares me thinking a small child could be severely hurt or worse by a dog like that.
Who doesn’t love Judge Middleton?
I doubt the person that got bitten. Because Littleton felt like he wanted to give the guy extra time loves Middleton. I don't love middleton cause he's weak
Me. As a person he seems like a great guy, but as a judge he's soft. The more I've watched him over the last few years, the more respect I lose. He's all bark and no bite. Criminals don't believe he'll hold them accountable. They aren't scared in front of him. It's pathetic.
@@grbenwaythat’s not true , he ordered the dog to be put down, it was another judge that gave a stay
Another good citizen of Sovtardia
Free the pup!!!
"Sovtardia" I love it 😆
All of the policy questions were most likely to head off any sort of civil suit. I'm actually surprised that Ms. Davis didn't object to the relevance. I also found it hilarious that the defense attorney wanted a postponement due to not having the pictures he already had access to. He then asked questions about specific details of one of the pictures. Finally, if the dog had been destroyed after the first attack, this woman wouldn't be living the rest of its life disfigured and terrified.
So is this hearing because of the other judge's stay, or because someone else was attacked? How long and how many times will this dog attack people until it's finally settled?
@@molliannstocks2217 This hearing is because an additional case was filed after the stay was put in place. When the last case happened, where Middleton had ordered the dog put down, this incident had just happened a few days prior and this dangerous dog case hadn't been filed yet. It takes time to get all the paperwork together for filing something like this because once you do it triggers a lot of timetables to start taking effect. The prior order to put the dog down was due to the dog's attack against the neighbor originally, they just had some basic testimony about this case added in to show the animal was still dangerous during that previous hearing.
Iirc that initial Middleton appearance was the second time the dog had bitten someone.@@huma474
So the bite in the kennel would be its third bite.
Dang this is the whole sovcit pipeline in two videos. Desperate guy leaning into the crazy in an effort to protect his dog 😞
No, just trying to avoid accepting any responsibility for what happened to both of the victims of the animal. Pretending that he's not really the person involved so he can't be sued for his negligence.
52:00 "Douglas Diata, a living man"
(Debbie subtly shakes her head) 😂
If I recall there were 2 attacks where Miko had escaped his leash that were terrified to on the original case.
Dr. Diato's lawyer seemed to forget that this isn't a case of 'fault', but of 'dangerous dog'. Lawyer says 'Dangerous dog' several times.
As everyone has pointed out, the owner is the problem, not the dog.
I feel sorry for Debbie & Judge M (& you too, Mike!) for having to work this case TWICE; I'm a huge animal lover myself. There was no other ending to this story.
If middleton had done his job and not been a soft old liberal .. the second lady would not be all scared up.
This guy has no business having any dog that has the potential to be vicious
"Doc" complains that the dog is cooped up in a cage all day and simultaneously complains that the dog was let out (and led to the latest attack).
I considered this "doctor" a liar and a self centered jerk from the very beginning.
He's lied under oath, several times and doesn't care about anyone but himself.
Because of him, the dog must pay the penalty.
I looked him up.
He's exactly what I thought he was, a freaking chiropractor.
I would never use the word doctor to describe a chiropractor.
I lived just down the street from the country's leading chiropractor school in the 80's.
Almost every person I met, who attended school there, was nuts.
You got that right!
#HesNotMyChiropractor
my aunt had her neck badly messed up by a chiropractor. recent studies show people are more likely to have strokes after neck adjustments because their arteries in the neck can become damaged
And yet I've had major family arguments, simply stating chiropractors are woo woo.
I can't believe he calls himself a doctor 😵💫
I love Deborah Davis! She is thorough along with having empathy for the people she serves in these cases.
So this guy testifies that he trained and raised the dog, that the dog is not violent when he is with it, but he leaves it in the care of others at a kennel? I'd bet money that he raised a violent dog on purpose.
FOIA Request, no it's called discovery, and if it was needed it's up to your attorney to request it.
Not just a dangerous dog, a dangerous owner not willing to accept he has a dangerous dog, whether that be a pet, or guard dog, if it was a guard dog he should have been more careful with it in the first case.
ya, that's why Middleton didn't allow the hearing to be delayed and why he pointed out to the lawyer that it was an exhibit that was already admitted. Basically legal speak for "You didn't do your homework properly and that's not my problem"
Oh my God I can’t believe they’re blaming the victim.
We can find that this is a dangerous dog but also find the kennel worker grossly negligent and derelict in her duties.
The reason for the distinction is whether or not the owner has civil liability for the kennel worker’s injuries. And I don’t think he should be liable. I also don’t think he should get the dog back.
The DR(?) actually sits there laughing @ 1:19:15 while Judge Middleton is speaking about how dangerous this dog is. Unbelievable!
owner should not have been allowed to interact with animal at all until final disposition and she had no business interacting with it either
She handled her testimony like a champ. She did a great job!
Agree, very calm and articulate.
accidentally put this on .5 playback speed and Mike’s intro was hilarious, like he was really drunk lol
What particularly bothers me about this case is that it seems certain that Dr Diata is going to get another big dog, perhaps another Akita, and that dog, too, is going to be dangerously aggressive.
He’s not a real doctor
I think you are likely correct.
When he said “a dog is not a person”.. that hit hard!! 😢
Oh Lawd, he’s going sovcit…🫣
I quite believe how she describes things in hospital. I've had a couple of small puncture wounds from dogs in the past and they hurt like a bastard (I get regular kindey stones these days and the pain's up there). So I can quite empathise with her feeling sick due to the adrenaline and shock. I've been there.
I saw the pics on Judge Middletons video. Her face looked painful.
The loser in this is of course the dog. He's only 2 years old. Very sad.He clearly loves his dog, but I'm not sure what the Dr. thought going SovCidiot would accomplish. And given why the dog was there, WHY would the Dr. even consider telling this kennel staff that the dog "was trusting her" or suggest that she have ANY contact with him? Dumb, dumb, Unfortunately Akitas are not easy to train and steadfast loyal to their person and leary of others. Typically 1 person. They can also be unpredictable. Throw that on top of being locked up in a strange place and without your person. While I feel really bad for the victim, I've watched previous hearings and am not impressed with how they handled this dog. And again. knowing why the dog was there, it should have been a big fat NOPE on her part to ty to get close to him.
I have not seen the whole case yet.But I think the Dr playing Soviet cit is to say they have no jurisdiction over him. So they can't put his dog down.
Mike~ I appreciate you putting this up w/your commentary. Ive followed this through Middletons courtroom. Such a sad situation. Thx for opening my eyes to the courtrooms I follow now. You're awesome 🎉❤
Last hearing Mr Diata was roasting the staff for opening the doors…. Now we hear he was pushing for them to work with the dog and to take her out. What a piece of garbage.
I once had the pleasure of foreclosing on an AF vet who was then a pilot with a major airline, a week before I was scheduled to fly out of town on that airline. I changed my flight.
The defense attorney sounded more like he's trying to protect his client from civil liability, making the argument that the dog was somehow not dangerous sounded like an afterthought. I'm guessing the owner has been told by his attorney that that he might be facing some liability and that's where the SovCit thing comes in.
I was a full time dog trainer for many years. Dog breeds that are bred for guarding, hunting down slaves (look it up), bear baiting, dog fighting are inherently more dangerous than those bred for rabbit hunting or duck hunting etc. it's a combination of genetics and training, but genetics will always prevail. People need to realize this before they get in over their heads like Mr sovcit here. He gets sh*t dog owner of the year. This poor kennel employee will never be the same.
It absolutely sounds like he feels the dog is vicious if he is unwilling to allow even animal control people to interact.
I was surprised last time that the judge accepted to call the defendent doctor, considering he is a "doctor of chiropractic" and not an MD. I think it was out of sympathy for his situation and because he felt bad he had to declare the dog dangerous and order its destruction. This time, after the Sov Cit bullshit, he is calling his mister! 😂 I like this judge!!
We had a Chiropractic Doctor teaching at a middle school I worked at (public school). He would get so upset if someone forgot to call him DR.
@@LauraJayne64that's funny! I refuse to call a chiro doctor any more than I would call an English PhD a doctor. And none of the real doctors I know care much about how they're addressed, maybe because they're actually successful.
He is a doctor. So is a dentist. So is a PhD professor. He isn’t an allopathic or osteopathic physician but he has a doctorate degree and is properly addressed as Dr.
@@GoodnightJLH Chiropractic isn't a real medical degree, it's a useless anti-science woo-filled pseudo-degree.
Unfortunately, the government allows these quacks to form a professional body and to call themselves "doctor".
It is deceptive and misleading, but it hasn't been stamped out yet.
His wife trying not to laugh at Judge Middleton's sovsit comment. 😂😂
When I was a kid we had a German Shepard. We had to have him put down because he bit a teenage boy. After we put him down we found out that everyday that kid would throw rocks at our dog . The day the dog bit him the kid was playing croquet with my brother. The ball hit the dog. I said I’ll get the ball” He said “Rick knows me he won’t bite me”. Well I still miss that dog.
When I was a kid, I was bit on my head/face by a Saint Bernard while playing with the neighbor boy. I never did anything to that dog, she got loose and the boy went into the house to tell his mom. I was afraid of the dog and went to go into the house too, and that's when she attacked me. The family had her put down. Once a dog attacks like that, you just can't trust it won't happen again.
This case breaks my heart! I was really really hoping something good would happen to this dog…and it’s obvious his family REALLY loves him. Coming to see him daily, bring food and treats…
That said, something is wrong with this doggie. I do think most of the blame goes to the training he was given. But, some dogs just seem to have a couple wires crossed. So so sad but that dog really does need to be put down…😢
PS: Mr Diota was obviously a complete liar and really made himself look bad saying “he said leave his dog alone.” BUT he wanted the dog to be able to run. Attorney was an a** and Mr Diota…and ur dog bit 3 people!!! Good god!!
He loves that dog SO much...but apparently not enough to get him any training.
As a child My father adopted a Doberman Pinscher from the animal shelter. Shortly thereafter Christmas arrived and our cousins were with us. My young female cousin was on the floor playing with the dog
Didn't see that coming.
Edit: As always, it's worth checking out Debbie's reaction to the jabberwocky.
I’m a huge dog lover and used to believe that any dog could be rehabilitated. That simply isn’t true. A family member got a Pyrenees mix puppy. He was properly socialized and trained by an experienced dog owner. But there was always something off about him. As he grew to well over 100 pounds he became far more dangerous. He had certain tells and triggers that would precede most attacks. But he would also attack with absolutely no provocation or indication sometimes. These attacks were like a blind, thrashing, snarling, snapping, charging rages. It was terrifying. He went after me several times. We consulted with multiple vets, trainers, behaviorists and they all eventually refused to work with him and recommended behavioral euthanasia…all of them. He also suffered from recurrent ear infections. But he would attack anyone who tried to get near his ears. Treatment was virtually impossible. Ultimately the decision was made that he had to be put down. It was extremely difficult and extremely sad. He could be very sweet at times. But he was so unpredictable and so powerful there was no other safe & ethical choice. He was going to maim or kill someone eventually
I’m happy your didn’t show the pictures the wounds to her face where horrible and I work in healthcare and seen a lot of horrible 💩
This was the third hearing regarding this dog you showed us @Law Talk With Mike. The first was in the video titled “YOLO Homewrecker? : A Wild Mix of Court Clips (wild court moments #580). Shown on October 5,2023 and starts at 5:56.
Mike looks like a shark in that dark suit. Lol😂 Thank you for blocking the pictures of the woman who was attacked.
I'm glad he said he was a living man otherwise I would have thought he was a corpse.
I was heart broken for Stefanie, especially as she’s a dog lover which was a double whammy for this poor woman knowing the animal would be put down. Thanks for covering the photos Mike.
Can't wait for Judge Middleton to begin quoting from e.e. cummings next.
People keep asking about a “happy ending”. What “happy” ending? It’s disgusting that a dog was trained to be viscous. But the “happy” ending is that the neighborhood is spared the fear of a violent and vicious animal and irresponsible animal owners. This is not a situation where an animal is needlessly put down. This is a consequence that serves the PEOPLE of the community.
There is indeed fault. It lies with the dog's owner, the new-found SovCit quack doctor.( I consider all chiropractors to be quacks).
Chiropractors are absolutely quacks. And dangerous at that
Back cracking quacks.
I see we have some duck haters in the chat.
This a thing with some sovs -- I dunno whether it's machismo or paranoia, but they gravitate to what I think they see as 'war dog' breeds.
And then of course they go as full Dunning-Kruger on dog raising as they do on pretty much the rest of life, and they produce dangerous animals.
And then this outcome arrives and the dog has to pay the ultimate price for the humans' selfishness.
This story has produced a depressing number of cases.
Yeah, what’s stopping the dog owner from doing this again to another dog? He should be on notice that he will be scrutinized if this happens again.
Scrutinized? He shouldn’t be allowed to own ANY other animals, period. These poor animals have to lose their lives because of his selfishness!
this is his 2nd akita, and he wants to pure breed this one
@@songs6009owner says dog id Akita/Shepard mix in previous testimony
Akitas can be great dogs, but they can be rambunctious, very aggressive with other animals and are not real keen on strangers, and have a high prey instinct. They need serious training and socializing from the time they are very young puppies and on an ongoing basis. They are powerful dogs, and if he's dangerous, he's dangerous - let's note here that is 100% on the owner for not doing or getting the PROPER training. I'm sure no judge or prosecutor relishes the decision to put someone's beloved pet down. It's sad no matter how you slice it. 😢
i was very concerned when the owner said he trained the dog himself but was using him as guard dog, from what i understand a real guard dog undergoes a lot of professional training. he's a chiropractor, he could afford a good dog trainer.
Mike you just get your videos perfect. I tried Natalie law chick, too much interruption and talking in between, you say just the right amount at the right times. You’re just a natural and know what people like. I agree with all of your view points! Love your work, your videos are my main staple daily! Love from Australia ❤
Agree about Natalie. Also it was too much selfie posing. Mike makes it primarily about the clips and having fun not self aggrandizement
yes I dropped my natalie sub, too much talking and too much about her, she's a nice person, she'll prob get better
Same she talks way too much that I just skip through it
Colin not Cromwell talks more
@@cathibeastevenson634 didn't last long being subbed to his channel, all about him and he has no knowledge of law that I could discern. He is so whiny, I couldn't take it.
Didn't the initial attack take place in his presence? The fact he can't even tell when the dog is going to go off is also a huge problem. These people need to be banned from future dog ownership.
Edit: They shouldn't have gotten the first stay. They didn't file in time. Middleton was too nice and it resulted in another attack.
Agree, I'm guessing he feels responsible for this last attack, I know I would. Those pics were awful, and the kennel lady was clearly traumatized, you could hear it/see it.
It was a different judge that gave the stay , Middleton ordered the dog put down
@@cleobinx Yes but they were out of time to file that stay in the first place. Middleton gave them an extension so they could file. Then another judge approved it, but it never should have gotten there.
Judge Middleton is brutal with SovCits 😂 I love his approach.
I would guess that the defense attorney wasn't there to argue that the dog wasn't dangerous. Judging by the way he crossed the kennel worker, I'm guessing he was hired to protect the Diatas from civil litigation. (i.e., if you can't save your dog, at least save your pocketbook).
If the Sov Cit owner had raised this dog properly by training it, keeping it on a leash while off his own property and keeping it fenced in on his own property, this never would have happened. The poor dog, but there was no other verdict possible.
Dr Diatta not having any special training, nor putting his dog into specialized training is like someone with a gun not going to a gun safety class. Maybe they should be charging the Diattas instead of the dog!
You're a wonderful bloke Mike & my respect & admiration of you continues to grow.
Like you & so many others I'm an animal lover too.
This was tough to watch !!!
I recently got a loose cannon 8 year old great dane as a rescue. I specialize in end of life care for cats and now dogs. I love her fiercely already (grew up with extra large dogs). If she bit with no warning, that is a huge red flag. A euthanasia flag. Akitas are powerful dogs. Holy cow. And twice? Jesus.
"Let us never speak of this again."
Mike, I must beg to differ. Yes it's sad. Yes it's horrible. I don't like that animals are considered chattel by law any better than anyone else.
But it is interesting and I think it would be good to follow the case to its conclusion, at least as much as possible considering the Berrien County judge may not livestream it.
I love how Dr. Diata said you wouldn't see warning signs of you didn't know the dog. Then when asked what Miko's warning signs were: "I don't know."
Guess he doesn't know his own dog! No wonder his DIY training didn't turn out so well!
For the record, I'm not against people training their own dog...when they know what they're doing! Doc Borogove clearly didn't.
I agree. My best friend was attacked by a dog (pit boxer mix) several years ago. The owners were extremely irresponsible and the way that they trained their dog (or lack of training) resulted in this dog attacking a child, then my friend. The dog had to be put down because of these incidents. The dog was not leashed or chained and ran out of the owners garage to attack my friend who was walking past the house on the sidewalk. The dog did not respond to commands to stop and had to he pulled off her by the owner. Shame on these owners who allow these incidents to happen.
We had 3 German Shepherds and although 2 are service dogs they are also our guard dogs when we are home. The only thing they do is bark. It is a deterrent to anyone because of that, especially when I am home alone with mine. Our dogs have never growled.
(Guard) dogs that do not bark, growl, or having hair stand on end is very very scary. No warning whatsoever.
@@Axelsmomyeah, like if a dog is supposed to guard, I would think part of that is barking to dissuade funny business. Like the hope is that actual biting isn't necessary.
Of course, akitas were originally bred to hunt and/or guard against bears, so I suppose it makes sense you wouldn't want the bear to be warned. But something tells me they didn't have Miko to guard against St. Joe County's, or Calhoun County's, burgeoning bear population. Since I don't think we have bears in Michigan outside of the upper peninsula. Maybe very very northern lower peninsula. but not Battle Creek or south thereof.
@@Alyssa_M513 Jail for the owners
This dog owner is horribly negligent if he does not know his own dog, a breed he has owned for years, and cannot say what his dogs alert signs were. ANY dog has its cues, whether it be standing more alert, its ear position, its tail position, fur, sounds, etc. He also said his dog had no professional training, he trained it, and clearly his training is insufficient. Overall he is a negligent owner and I’m sorry his dog has to pay the price and I’m so sorry that two people will carry the reminders of their attacks for the rest of their lives.
And I swear the doc was giving me motion sickness from moving around constantly!
How is this Judge so unfortunate to get all these Sov Cit cases lol
Somebody I know used to get all the crazies in town come to him somehow.
We figured that every time a crazy rang any law practice, the practice must have been referring them.
Deb shaking her head when Dr Diata started with his Sovereign Citizen nonsense LMAO!
Mike I am so thankful you covered the photos
TY Mike
But is it a DOG, Dog or dog... Sov Cit nation's gotta know.
Like the attorneys argument. Basically the dog isnt dangerous, it wouldnt attack people if these pesky humans just left it isolated from all other animals on the planet. Its the peoples fault makes perfect sense.
Love Debbie's head shake when he was asked to state his name
Your dogs are St Louis Cardinal Fans I'm sure!
A day or two after the previous hearing, Judge Middleton mentioned that it had been appealed and was before another judge. Because of this, I had been wondering if we would ever find out the results of this case.
What is the problem here? She violated policies, and knew the dog was there for biting somebody.( a second time!) That's on her!
She’s not suing him for damages from the bite that I’m aware of. Regardless, this case is about whether the dog is dangerous or not. The dog is clearly dangerous. The fact the dog attacked her without provocation is the issue. No one should have been interacting with the dog. But they were trying to give him some enrichment. And that isn’t the point anyway
Akitas as a breed are not dangerous, any breed is dangerous because of it's owners.
If there was a previous stay and now a second bite I don’t see a second stay.
Nobody really wins in these situations. How hard is it to take your dog to a few behavioral classes as a puppy? Especially in Michigan, those classes are everywhere!
he wanted the dog to be a guard dog. a lot of people dont realize thats a very technical job for a dog that requires specialized training, and not every dog is suitable for that job, even if they're a breed that was bred for it.
The questioning by Diata’s lawyer infers that the dog is “dangerous”
The only defense was that either the dog was NOT a dangerous dog or that it was unreasonably provoked. It would be difficult to argue, but I'm shocked that the defense attorney didn't even try. Why would any attorney argue a case on a theory of law that can't possibly win? By arguing that the employee violated the "Dangerous Dog" signs he literally admits that the dog was dangerous.
Yup just a sympathy play
This breed of Dog is banned in this Country for this very reason
Unfortunately, I think the employee and the county have liability here. There's no formal training and the employee ignored the signage directing her safe interactions with the dog.
She knew the dog was dangerous and pending euthanization. She also knew she wasn't trained to directly handle the dog with the pole. Her supervisor allowed her to interact with the dog knowing she didn't have formal training.
It's really unfortunate and i hope the employee's scars, both physical and psychological, can be minimized.
As for the owner... He's a looney tune who should have just acknowledged the danger of the dog.
Yes judge ! Break down the elements and apply the facts! LETS GOOOOO!
"A dog is not a person, and is considered chattel." Cat owners have known this for years...
My grandson was bitten in the face by a dog. That baby has never been scared of dogs. I have Great Pyrenees, he use to love them so much. Now he says”NeeNee, come with me pppllleeeaassseee.” “Fred’s on the porch, so I need you” at two years old this baby would tell Fred stories only the two of them understood.
*As someone who is working with dogs and has helped the police/animal control with dangerous dogs, the owner is 100% at fault to begin with.* I feel though that the facility is also at fault *to some degree.* Only dogtrainers *with experience in handling dangerous dogs should deal with these types of dogs.*
The woman broke procedure/policies and sadly got bit. It seems she have misread the dog in my opinion *based on her description of his behavior,* which is my point as to why the facility also is to blame, they should only have experienced, educated dogtrainers handling these types of dogs.
I cannot state it as fact since I wasn't there and haven't seen the dog I didn't get to witness it's body language, but by her description it seems that her lack of knowledge also led to the bite, which is why I say the facility should have a super strict policy that only experienced handlers should deal with. I would even say they should be kept in a separate area with a door that has a coded lock that only experienced handlers can go through.
I would not have opened the kennel if he showed the behavior she described. Again I'm not blaming her for having a heart and probably loves dogs and felt bad for him.
It's the owners fault who did not train the dog properly. Akitas are fierce, and needs copious amounts of training and a knowledgeable handler. He is now paying the price due to the negligence of the owner who did not take responsibility and time to handle and train this sort of dog.
Just as an FYI
A dog that stares at you can be an indicator of them being ready to act. Like "I'm watching you, do not take one more step into my space or else." . Esp. if they are cornered, in a small space and following your every move, being very alert, raised tail ,raised ears and so on. She came in with a high value resource (wetfood) into his space, akitas are more a "one person dog "
The dog had been with the worker together with the owner. Making the dog accept her in the owners presence. The owner is at fault the whole way.
This is just to inform everyone, a dog that tenses up, raises it tail and locks its eyes on you can be a sign of them "loading" /or is ready to engage. Some dogs do not growl. Esp if the dog is punished or told no every time they try to communicate something to you/others. The dog can raise its hackles without it being due to aggression, it can happen due to excitement. It's important to learn how to read dogs and not think that a wagging tail = happy dog.
Police dogs can be seen wagging their tails when biting someone as an example, out of excitement.
Also, neutering doesn't guarantee changes in behavior since the adrenal glands also produce testosterone and according to studies its hard to say how much that plays a part in behavior. Neutering to early can lead to healthcomplications as well
Train your dogs. Learn how to read your dog. Always have a collar on even if you use a harness. Take responsibility, learn about your breed, socialise your dog, spend 15-20 minutes every day working on a select few commands at least, I work my dogs for atleast 2hrs every day, but that's due to them having an owner who works with dogs, and who uses these dogs to help rehabilitate dogs with behavioral issues
I feel for this dog who will lose its life due to the negligence of the owner. He should not be allowed to own animals ever again
Should be some kind of "license" to own a dog, atleast certain breeds. Like a drivers license but for dogs.
Very informative comment! 👍 I used to be an A.C.O. years ago and also had to deal with "dangerous " dog's and irresponsible dog 🐕 owners. You're absolutely 💯 right by saying "Some people shouldn't own dog's "
Having worked as a kennel attendant, she definitely screwed up…but the dog should absolutely be labeled a dangerous dog, and if it wasn’t her, it would have likely bitten someone else in addition to the original bite. I’m not saying the original bite automatically made it a dangerous dog, but attacking a kennel attendant solidified it.
Edit: I have seen first hand dogs being absolutely feral when their owners weren’t around, but perfect angels when the owners were there
I'd bet my last dollar that the policy is now written somewhere
Mike, this guy is not a real doc, he's a FREAKING CHIROPRACTOR. No wonder he went sov cit.