Phil Dawson's CRAZY Field Goal vs Ravens (Broadcast Version)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лют 2025
- It was long overdue that someone uploaded a good quality, broadcast version of this memorable field goal by Phil Dawson. That's why this channel exists.
Twitter: / ramenrobbie95
Patreon: / ramenrobbie
Main Channel: / ramenrobbie
Twitch: / ramen_robbie
For those who can't recall the details and outcome (like me): November 18, 2007. Dawson's kick tied the game at 30 and led to OT. Browns win in OT by another Dawson FG.
I was in AIT at Fort Gordon. I wiled out seeing this!
Such a great, memorable game.
Are you serious??? I was expecting to see another glorious win by the Ravens... shocked to find out Ravens lost..thanks for tid Bit ..
This guy Dawson, God willing he's still out there somewhere, goes to sleep at night with a smile on his face thinking about his sometimes.
This is the correct way to do a double doink
This play is probably one of the reasons all networks now have a rules analyst. This would have been a prime moment of having them go over the rule.
I liked football better before the commentators would defer to some former referee every 2 plays.
But would the analyst really KNOW for this? I can imagine that the first thing he'd say would be "That's not reviewable" and that the rest would have been, yeah, it should be a field goal but it won't be.
Oh man I remember this… for some reason I didn’t turn off the tv like I normally do when the Browns lose. The fact that they even got into field goal range was unbelievable, then to have that happen. I’ll never forget it. Go Browns!
Lmfao they were good this year. Had like ten wins
@@keisyisbeefy Yeah
Yeah and then everyone clapped
I like how the commentator explained that it went through but bounced back 1000 fucking times, and repeatedly circled the ball in yellow just in case we still didn’t understand.
then berates the officials for not getting it right the 1st time, as if anybody knew it was a good fg at first
Pretty sure it's Greg Gumbel, insanely annoying
Well that is their job to explain what is going on.
It was confusing what happened, that’s why they were explaining it and showing it multiple times.
Not to mention it was irrelevant whether or not it bounced back in because it's automatically good if it clears the cross bar.
Just like a home run in baseball if it clears the wall but bounces back into the playing field. It's still a home run.
You can see both referees standing by the goal posts, staring at each other, confused onto what just happened.
Pete Morelli is the GOAT for not running off the field
After discussion baby. He knew the rules.
Watching browns games for 24 years you see a lot of “I’ve never seen that before”
I remember watching this live. What a crazy run of events for us all.
That is the most physics-defying field goal in NFL history!
The OG Double Doink
That ball hit about a foot into the cross bar ontop of the middle bar that's coming from the ground holding up the post. Thats a GOOD FIELD GOAL!.
Do you think the ball bounced back onto the field of play? The color commentator wasn’t too clear on that
Man I remember watching this game as a kid in my bedroom going nuts thinking it was good was so devastated then thrilled all over again 😂
This game also gave us the word "rickershay" 1:16
lol is he trying to say ricochet?
Yes@@quetzalcoatlz
It didn't seem like anyone knew the rule....officials, announcers, players, coaches. Glad the right call was ultimately made.
Yeah like, I'd love to hear from the refs how figuring this out worked because I don't blame them for having NO idea lol
@darkhorseash4337 Best I can think of is this.
Somewhere on the discussion part the referee asked if either official actually saw the ball go past the cross bar...which it did" Once one said yes they ruled it was good.
They couldn't go to replay but I think they were able to communicate with a "rules expert" to see what exactly rule was.
The next year the league made fgs reviewable
So I saw something on espn a while back. The replay booth wouldn't let the head official look at it because at the time field goals couldn't be reviewed. He went to both the officials under the goal posts and asked them what they thought happened. One said he thought it hit the crossbar and the other said it hit the extension in the back and the head official went with the one that was more convincing which was part of the reason it took so long. I think you can kind of see it here but I'm not sure it looks like the judge on the left is looking right at the ball and the one on the right is looking forward. I'm not 100% sure on that part though.@@mikedecarlo9057
@@mikedecarlo9057I'd bet this was a big part of reviews being allowed the next year
Correct call was made. Ultimately.
I remember this game. Great job by Pete Morelli.
Been trying to find where they interview the Ravens kicker thinking the game was over and Dawson goes up to him and says "overtime". Can't find it but it was very funny.
Ravens fan here, 100% correct call. It was good
No, it wasn’t. If the ball hits any part of the cross bar and bounces back into the field of play it’s no good. The ball should pass the entire field goal out of the field of play for it to be a field goal. The ravens won that game. Wrong call.
@@adamantonakos161 Didn't matter in the long run. It was a lost season for the Ravens anyway. Only win you guys got was Billick being fired.
Back when 51 yard field goals were considered long. Kickers are routinely hitting from 57-60 now.
It’s still considered long in some stadiums. But back then guys were still drilling from 55-60.
It is long. Kickers have been consistently trying for 55+ for at least a decade now.
If you look closely when the ball hit the post on the back bar it was then out of bounds and therefore could not come back into the field of play and be a live ball.
Who are these guys that don't know the "Upright" from the "Crossbar" from the "Extension"?
who gives a shit
Love those silly football bounces
It looked as if one official signaled neither "good" nor "missed". But, it isn't clear if the other official signaled "miss" or was using his hands to point.
I watched this live. I think I was with my dad. A great moment!
2007 was just a bizarre year for cleveland. What could have been considered a new dawn for cleveland, was just an oddity that they would not repeat until 2020.
I was watching this game in a bar. I knew it was good.
For the announcers: the tall things are the "goalposts", the horizontal thing is the "crossbar", the back thing is the "upright"!!!!!
And you get paid to call NFL games?!
Actually the uprights are the tall, vertical things on either side of the crossbar. The back part is usually called the extension or the stanchion.
@@ScottCleve33 I misspoke. The entire structure is the goalpost.
i saw this live what a crazy game
Has there ever been another similar field goal where it hit the back of the goal post and it was good?
I had wondered about this kind of thing from the first day they started using that kind of goal post. It finally happened decades later with this kick. Then, if I recall, it happened again later that night in the night game (or maybe it was the week after). Crazy.
This is the scenario I was looking for at 5:30 am
Who is watching this after the Lutz double doink?
There’s no such thing as a “left crossbar” or “back upright”. It hit the left upright and landed on the stanchion before bouncing back over the crossbar.
This is the most Cleveland Browns thing ever.
Yeah except we usually lose these
That announcer has no clue what going thru the uprights means.
I’d like to know the odds of this happening. The physics of the bounce back toward the field of play doesn’t make sense to me. With the momentum of the ball going through the uprights, what are the odds that the ball bounces backwards when it hits the top of a curved support bar? The odds have to be close to one in a million. I wonder how long it would take someone to replicate this exact bounce.
If it goes through it should count, even if it bounces back.
Yeup because it going through is now out of bounds
How many other Teams have dozens of In Awe plays like the Baltimore Ravens have achieved...
This can only happen to the Browns and maybe the Jets!!! We thought the Cubs were cursed.
I don't understand the point of saying a play is "non-reviewable" if it can clearly be defined in film.
Man Solomon Wilcots was a solid ass commentator, wonder what happened. I’d take him over many of the C squad color commentators they got now lol
I don't get it. The replay booth said the play wasn't reviewable yet they did review it. So which is it?
They didn’t review it the refs got together and decided to overturn the call
Who's here after Justin Tucker's record-breaker 14 years later?
I'm here alive and well
Double Doink: The Good True Ending
Correct me if i’m wrong, but that’s a good kick today right? as long as it goes through it’s good
edit: i finished watching 🤣
The announcer that kept repeating where the ball came to rest clearly didn't get it lol. It went through. It was good lol. Doesn't matter of the ball bounced back to the 50.
Damn i was 11 years was mad as hell when they said he missed as a browns fan we don't get these type of calls to go ower way
This officiating crew didn't want another episode of Bottlegate
Except it was in Baltimore.
Usually these types of things don’t go the Browns way.
I hate it when it rickerchetes backs into the field of play
"Rickershayed"
I still remember this game. I was a sophomore in High school, and probably my 2nd year as a full time Browns fan. Such a great year. I even remember watching Titans vs Colts game, hoping for Colts wins, so we could go to the playoffs.
Wait til the Chizled Adonis sees _this!_
This is just like the James Harden dunk
My Uncle was at this game. He refuses to accept that the Ravens lost the game 33-30 because he left after the "missed" field goal, so he continuesto claim he saw a 30-27 win.
Well then, he is an idiot. Missed a great finish and is refusing to accept the fact that the FG was good? Weird.
Anyone with a brain knows the FG was good, nobody still argues that. Who leaves when the refs are clearly discussing it? Seems like he has some deep, deep issues.
Your uncle is wrong
By rule at the time that game should have been over in regulation. Because the refs looked at the video which by rule fgs were not reviewable. The refs should have reported the play to the nfl office and explain why fgs and pat's should be reviewable from this point on.
@@A_NotesReview or not, the ball went through. Result. It's good.
@@A_Notes I believe that's actually what happened. If you watch this video again the one official does go to the replay but never actually looks at it. He puts on the headphones and turns his head away from it. From what I understand he went over there to discuss it with a league official to get clarification on the rule.
If the football bounces off the goalpost and doesn’t go through completely, it’s not a field goal. I will go to my grave saying the ravens won this game. That was a miss. Ravens win. This was the first game I ever went to, ruined because ppl don’t think logically. That was a miss, I believed it when I was 6, I believe it now.
Basically 1/1million moment
This just goes to show good call or bad call the refs will always get booed
Listen to fans boo because they would rather have it easy and discount the opposing teams efforts and not care if the Browns got cheated!
Rickershayed😄
Not For Long. NFL.
Its 2023, can refs use replay now for field goals? Seems reasonable
Excuse me your looking in the wrong area I make 51
The refs got it right
😂
And then a woman’s infant son falls from her arms and hurdles towards the astroturf, but Dawson kicks the baby up and back into the waiting mother arms… Mentos.
what
NFL Refs: trying to screw the Browns since '99
The refs literally gifted them the past two games
A QB usually holds the kick #15 for 51 No Good! Timeout Flag + Challenge Flag its a Challenge You have to win the Yellow Flag and then you win a 4 point PAT attempt.
Okay Chiefs Flag Burried under Allegiant Stadium
Yellow Flag is used as a Jolly Rodger throw 2 flags
Jolly Green Giant Roger that Rodgers 12 - 4 Brett the Jet 2008 Rodgers Jet Flying limousine riding kiss stealing wheeling dealing Son of a Top Gun wait injury your late #8 Aaron Rodgers in 24 last guy who recovered from a torn Achilles tendon to score many points in his final game KOBE Bryant.
We FLY Safe Beyond 24🛫✈️🛬 for Kobe remember 1st step is a pre flight checklist. Even if your walking step 1 make sure shoes aren't wet.....would crashed into blistery feet
Aaron Rodgers & Kobe Bryant wore #8
The year 2024. #24
Browns still lost in ot. Ravens won.