The edits were inconsequential to he photograph and were super tiny. When I saw the circles of the "edits" I thought they were so completely petty and ridiculous. I'm sure more obviously photos are far far worse and yet get a pass. The media focuses on the wrong things and even those are exactly the full truth.
I am amazed that the 3 year old is the same size as her 5 year old brother. I am am also surprised that somehow Archie’s brown hair is now ginger. The other strange thing is the little girl has very long hair, one child is wearing a summer dress but the boy is ready for winter
At the time poor Princess Catherine was savaged for her Mother's Day photo, H and M stated they'd "never make that mistake" They are liars, hypocrites, and the laughing stock of the world. Thank you Sidley family for the great analysis! ❤ #istandwithcatherine
Oh yes, they really went to town on Catherine, but boy, she's dealt with that 100%... Where the media had the royal photos were open to most of the media, they messed up big time, because Catherine now takes the royal photos herself and the MEDIA have now got to ASK Catherine if they can USE THEM... Karma is beautiful... Pick on Catherine Princess of Wales, and you will be punished big time... This was down to pure jealousy with SLUG and TURDBALL... and all their photos are noticeably photoshopped, they're that bad it sticks out like a sore thumb, so SLUG's 'attention to detail' and 'they never make that mistake', jeez, SLUG needs to look at EVERY PHOTO SHE'S IN TO SEE HOW PHOTOSHOPPED THEY ARE... flawless skin' 🚩'perfect makeup' 🚩'made to look 20 years younger'🚩🚩🚩 The errors are that bad, it's a joke, just like that 2024 Business Xmas Card... 🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮🪣🪣🪣🪣GB
Those children had titles from birth, they were styled as Earl Archie of Dumbarton and Lady Lilbet, accepted Rachel did want that, she wanted the same as Prince William children who are heirs to the throne. All Rachel has ever done is lie. And when the truth about the birth of those two come out, Rachel was similarly say she had to use a surrogate because the Royal family didn’t want black grandchildren.
According to my High School Biology class, red hair is a recessive trait. Markle's dominant dark coloring would result in children with dark hair (and eyes). Those aren't her kids.
People need to remember the appalling treatment meted out to a seriously ill Princess Catherine when she attempted to perfect a photo she had indeed taken of her family. She was subjected to a worldwide onslaught, when her only crime was to placate a press that would give her no peace and privacy!!
Megaliar needs to be be treated the same way her and her bully squad treated poor princess Catherine and bullied her into coming out while fighting cancer and her surgery to make a statement because of the Mega trashes lies.
Considering Me-again didn't want the flower girls in her wedding (in England) to wear tights , I find it hard to believe she would let her daughter wear knee high socks in CA. Also, little girls haven't worn knee high socks since the 70s. ALSO, Lili is very tall for a 3 yr old.
Archiedoll tiny for a 5yo boy by comparison. Also still wearing the same clothes. Same a Littlebucks, only changed the pigtails to as the miracle pilot described. A waterfall to her waist, as he mam's.
Why doesn’t the main stream media put a kill notice on this holiday card photo?. It’s Absolutely, totally photoshopped pic . It’s like they are now wanting to be called out.
They do play games with their pictures and if their intentions are for bad attention Allegedly MeGain could care less how it looks as long as she gets full attention Desperation!!!!! My opinion of course 🥴🥴
There was when Cathrine was falsed to share a photo on mothers day, while going through chemo. Why dont they just give their and the kids titles back, they can send out what ever cards they want
I was just coming to post this exact thing! 2 years apart would be a much bigger difference in size. I have kids that are 21 months apart, and they were never this close in size.
Agree. This was the first thing that struck me. I have never seen such a big three-year-old. And Archie seems to be wearing the same clothes from another photo.
"As a mother", two things stand out: there's zero chance your children will run to you (unless they're acting), and family dogs always want to be part of the action (cue: centre stage).
I love how your Dad’s opinion is based 100% on facts, and what he see through his own professional eyes. No conspiracy theories with Kirk, and that is such a relief.
Meghan wouldn’t care about the real parents wanting Christmas pictures. Faces can’t be shown because they don’t look like Markle’s, Raglands, Spencers, or Windsors. If they were Meghan’s children, they’d look like her, pre-plastic surgery. Faces need to be hidden until they are old enough for their own plastic surgery. Also, neither child is a red-head.
My 3 year old granddaughter’s hair is very long, well down past her shoulders - she turned 3 yrs old in October 2024. But she’s definitely not as tall as the little girl in the photo.
@@feoltmanns7624 If She take s after he mum in the hair dept it would be curly and short due to Meghan's afro heritages , Meghan doesnt have long or straight hair until late teens and twenties when she discovered straighteners and extensions!!
I couldn’t wait for this video since seeing that picture! Some other things I noticed: Harry has 6 fingers on his right hand. Betty has a clubfoot and is quite big for a 3 year old. She is as big as 5 year old Archie. Meghan’s top half is facing Archie but her legs and feet are facing the opposite direction.
Not too long ago (NY before he flew to the U.K. for the Wellchild event?), the dimwit said that she’s supposed to be gifted with her mom’s hair and was so long that she could sit on her hair
@RachelDavies-wn7ir I thought that the photo put out by Catherine was put on their social media. I may be incorrect. Since Meghan and Harry are not working royals, maybe the press doesn't care.
Why should there be? The Wales family are heir to the throne. They are important. This family are celebrities living in America. Totally irrelevant what they do no msm will think it's newsworthy.
Harry's face looks like it was stuck on someone else. And has Lilibucks been wearing that dress since July 4th? In Spare, H said Mugsy made her own clothes. Maybe she could make her 'daughter' a new dress.
Thank You Ladies and Mr Sidley. The Harkles are "SICK" - The children "will ALWAYS BE LITTLE" because that's how a Narcissist "operates". A shocking photo of this shocking family.
My thought is the summer clothes for rented girl and winter sweater for a rented boy. Plus the Diana scene recreation proves it is staged, which is really disturbing on so many levels.
Apparently they were photoshopped, at least the Harry’s black one, allegedly said by Sidley Twins’s father who is a professional photography expert. It’s not that it’s a crime to photoshop this and there, but it’s not just a retouching we are all pointing at, it’s that all of it is pure bs.
Regarding the photo of the kids I read a comment from a person that said and I quote "lived in Montecito and that the blue acanthus and blue Mexican sage in the are blooming, that occurs April-June. THATS WHEN THE PHOTO WAS TAKEN. That explains Lily’s summer clothes, which is a different season than Meghan’s and Archie’s clothes. If everyone was present at that same time, in summer, everyone would have dressed for hot California weather."
If that photo was taken in April-June latest, that would make the girl in the photo barely three years old IF it's Lily. No three year old I ever knew grew that big.
@@sandradavies7804 I actually have more issues with the dogs... they are in so weird poses, I had a dog she would never be so relax like that in that situation of excitment.
@@tsukinoyousei That is true. If your dog is ignoring you, run around excitedly and it'll come running to see what's happening. This whole photo is shopped to the max.
Meghan has one arm thats looks 6ft long! One of them has no hand. Little Better looking like she is 6 years but the poor lass has a club foot! Harry is defying gravity by the way he is squatting..and the list goes on. Welcome Dad, good to see you and to listen to your expertise xx
@judyweinstock9972 Looks clubbed, poor little girl and the black dog looks like he has a hind leg in place of a front left one! Harry is drying the laws of gravity by squatting like that... maybe he was seated before he was transported out of one photo into another. They are such a stupid pair....why not say..the boy luves with his birth mother in UK and little Better was an adoption that went wrong...either that or they have two kids as prisoners
I guess thats ehat MM was aiming for. Difference is though , that DIANA was running TO her children with her arms out for a hug .. but true to firm, MM is posed, arms outstretched and the children have to run to HER. What a fraud she is!😂😂
There was h§ll to pay when Princess Catherine released a photo that had been adjusted and the media went crazy. This photo is so badly photoshopped that the worst amateur can see it. Archie dressed for fall, Lilly for summer. How did a 3 yr old get as tall as a 5/6 yr old? How did Meg get an extension arm? Background sharp, people low resolution. Where is the media? 🌲🧑🎄🌲
Catherine’s photo ‘adjustments’ were so minor that they were barely visible. People were pointing out just a few pixel differences, the sort of things that normal people just don’t see because they are ridiculous. This photo however just looks false from the start. It’s so low res that it’s become blurry, many things look ‘off’, nothing seems quite right somehow. I don’t think Harry was there at all. The children’s attention and movement direction is towards Megsy of the long arm (although who knows of that really is Megsy as she appears to have changed shape, could easily be someone else with Megsys head ‘shopped on). As was said, there’s no knowing whether these children are A & L or someone else’s children who were told to run over to Megsy. The boy doesn’t look very excited to see his mother.
When my daughter was 3 her hair was down to her waist & it was trimmed regularly. She also had a full head of dark brown hair when she was born, but it was strawberry blonde by age 3. So Invisibet’s hair isn’t an issue to me. It’s more strange to me that in an “exciting” moment the dogs are so calm - my dogs always want in on the action (but we’re an actual family)!
Hello, Twins I know everyone else is saying the same thing about Lili. 1) She looks really tall for her age. 2)The sunshine is hitting everyone on different parts of their body, but not Lili? Why does she look like she's in a shadow? There should have been some sun on her head and on her shoulders. 3) Lili is not warmly dressed, but her mother and brother are wearing long sleeves. Thank you Daddy Sidley for helping out the girls with the photos!
It has been documented Harry was angry and jealous that William was the first to be embraced by Diana’s open arms on the ship (as seen in the photo) that he kicked William. You can see this on the footage that this photo was taken.
And may I say, I love Kirk! You guys, you are so blessed to have such a close relationship with your dad. I never had that and it's something that you wouldn't realize how vital it is for your psychological and emotional development, not because you dont appreciate it because I know you do, but because you just wouldn't know anything different. So take it from me, to have such a sweet father is a wonderful gift. ❤️
Don’t forget, the Meg also had “Betty” cosplay Charlotte one July 4th - same white dress with small blue flowers, white knee socks, and red Mary Janes.
I totally agree. When Princess Charlotte was a toddler she often wore smocked floral dresses. Meghain is trying to make Lili look like Charlotte.👑🏴🇬🇧
Your dad rocks. It's always a joy (and educational) when he comes on your show for a photo analysis. I agree with him. H and his dog were dropped into the pic. As for the children, they're borrowed or rented. And MM is cosplaying Diana. Great work, Nancy & Stephanie! ❤💚❤💚
A longer arm than the long limbed 5' 10" Diana, when you compare those two photos. Notice how even then William was trying to read his troubled mother's eyes.
Your dad is fantastic! I didn't even notice Meghan's arm until he brought it up. What I did notice is that you both have your dad's smile😊❤. Thank you all! Debbie
That photo is a travesty. Love your show and your dad's expertise. My favorites are the theme song 😅 and when you two break into song! 🎶 Keep up the good work, twins! 💞💞
20:14 That photograph of Dianna was not without a story. Apparently Charles was thanking all the staff on the ship who had been working to take care of him and Dianna, she shot off up on deck without a word to the staff and ran to the boys,, hence the photo. It is Royal protocol to thank the staff, and I would say that is the polite thing for any of us to do, but Dianna got the photo and Charles got the backlash for not being a caring dad. If there is anything I am learning, it is that Charles is a very caring father, and he was brought up with protocols.
I thought 'Meghan' looked like Princess Catherine this was probably the look she was going for I would like to see a blown up version to really check it all out.
@@goldenpig0711 yes. Pointing out the input of the black lab an Megan’s long arms. I would have not noticed. I was so interested in how Lilly was taller and bigger than Archie.
Pulling in the Garbage Bins is SUCH a Dad thing to do! I also agree with your Dad that Harry and the Black Lab were photoshopped. You can plainly see the ring around them. I also agree that she will try to monetize Little Betty - and it will have something to do with the name of "Lilibet" since she trademarked the Name.
Your Dad is methodical, and intelligent. I felt when he mentioned 'forensic' photography, that I was in the presence of someone who is attuned to the details while not prejudiced to any agenda. He was very fair in that way. A delight to have him join you today.
Your dad is so charming...hopefully you can forgive him for exploiting you in huge adverts with no pay, and throw him a few shekels in the spirit of Xmas! Love you two, you're the best!
Didn't Hawwy say to an audience that the rented child, named Lilibet, could sit on her hair! By the way even the patients admitted that they were faking it and being paid to pretend they were patients. Hawwy has six fingers! Socks?
*I love your dad visiting. Betty's clothes are definitely Charlotte's Cosplay! The knee* *socks in Calif? Puhleeeeeeeease. Merry Christmas Twins, Dad and Mom!* 🎄🎋
I still don't believe those are the real children in the pic. Is Archie stunted in that pic? Why is it OK for Meghan to photoshop and not get called out, but Catherine did it once and got blasted and Getty images wouldn't post Catherine's pic
Ladies the first thing I thought looking at the picture, was that this girl child looks like a five/six year old and that she was not dressed like a Californian child. I have experience of your lovely state from previously. Happy, Happy Christmas and a Guid New Year to you and yours. S xxx😊💖🌈🙏🏻🏴
I’m getting extremely tired of hearing about their children and the red hair. I don’t think either one of them have red hair. It’s a recessive gene that both parents have to have for a child to be born with red hair. The chances are astronomical that both of those children would be born with red hair 0:38
I think when a surrogate was used they also ordered the genetic qualities of the egg donor. I think those kids were ordered like you would order off a menu.
Both parents don't have to have red hair for a child to be born with it, only to have the potential somewhere in their genes. Meghan has that potential through her dad.
I understand both parents don’t have to have red hair for the child to have red hair. What I said is that they both must have the recessive red hair gene. In my opinion, the odds are astronomical that both of those children would be born with red hair.
CA kids haven't dressed that way (with knee socks) since the 70's -- I know because that is what my early childhood photos look like! AND - it's the same kind of dress/outfit she put her in for the July 4th parade -- so I think Twins are 100% right -- Meghan is going to market little kids Holly-Hobby-esque/Prairie clothing.
Yep, me too…I was 3 in 1967 but I didn’t wear knee socks until 1st grade in 1970 and wore them thru 8th grade (we wore Catholic school uniforms-jumpers and then skirts, American jumpers-dresses, not sweaters).
I just had a thought: it doesn’t say those two children are supposed to be theirs. They could just be the neighbours kids or someone else’s. I wouldn’t bet on it actually being them. The girl is def older than 3.5 and to me the boy is the same age as her. „We never said those were our children, the British press did“ - read in Harry’s horrible voice 🙃
True narcissism is the only thing they are celebrating in _that_ card. What it says to me is, “we love ourselves, SO much! And, oh yeah…we have children…kind of…sort of.”
The great Kirk Sidley is rapidly amassing a great number of ‘daughters’ he never knew he had! What a great dad! Nancy and Stephanie you are so lucky! Blessings too, to your gorgeous and equally fab Mum!
And the media in the UK went nuts over Princess Catherine's photo edits? Where is the media to talk about Meghan's photoshoping?
The edits were inconsequential to he photograph and were super tiny.
When I saw the circles of the "edits" I thought they were so completely petty and ridiculous.
I'm sure more obviously photos are far far worse and yet get a pass. The media focuses on the wrong things and even those are exactly the full truth.
Right, did the AP put this shot out? After all, their standards are so high.
That was driven by Misan and that Boozy jerk. They were the ones who started screaming and both of them are guilty of photoshopping.
@@KallaLily83 she isn’t worth the print !
@@KallaLily83 she is not royal
The only thing missing from that card is Diana hovering from the tree in a winged Mary Poppins outfit.
Great visual, lol.
😂
😂😂
Photo on the side of the bus! Lovely family advertising. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂
Interesting how the girl is always in socks, but she wouldn't stand for the flower girls to wear them in her wedding.
And dorky knee socks, to boot. Has anyone worn knee socks here in the US for decades?
@@anj6787...think more a British thing
@@anj6787, especially in sunny California!
@@anj6787and same dress as 4th of July 2023
@@anj6787 Don't worry, I'm here for that 😆
I am amazed that the 3 year old is the same size as her 5 year old brother. I am am also surprised that somehow Archie’s brown hair is now ginger. The other strange thing is the little girl has very long hair, one child is wearing a summer dress but the boy is ready for winter
Harry did say the girl has inherited Meghans long hair🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Great points.
Exactly what I thought about the size of lil Betty 😂
Thats no 3 year old girl.
Ha, ha, it's a miracle 'Lil Betty...
My congratulations to the Harkle's for having their children delivered by Amazon drivers
Omg lol😂
Best reply EVER! 👍🏼
Or AI.
🤣
Lol 😂 excellent content 🎅🏽🌲⛄️
Little Betty is dang near the same height as Archie!
That’s the biggest 3year old I have ever seen, she looks like she’s at least 6. No way is that kid three years old.
Agreed@@ginajennings1664
I said almost the same thing.
With Betty only a couple of months older than 2, there is no way that child in the photo is her. Unless she has been given growth hormones.
That was my first thought too 😂
In my opinion, the way the parents are greeting the kids, it looks like they are meeting up for the first time in ages!
I think the children look like they are running towards the Harold character but it's all a fake. My opinion.
You are right. They are meeting after not seeing each other for a long time. Your comment was the best tonight!
I was going to make the same comment!
Visitation day
The girl had to have long straight hair because Charlotte has.
At the time poor Princess Catherine was savaged for her Mother's Day photo, H and M stated they'd "never make that mistake"
They are liars, hypocrites, and the laughing stock of the world.
Thank you Sidley family for the great analysis! ❤
#istandwithcatherine
Her "freakish attention to detail"😂😂
🎯🎯🎯
Oh yes, they really went to town on Catherine, but boy, she's dealt with that 100%... Where the media had the royal photos were open to most of the media, they messed up big time, because Catherine now takes the royal photos herself and the MEDIA have now got to ASK Catherine if they can USE THEM... Karma is beautiful... Pick on Catherine Princess of Wales, and you will be punished big time... This was down to pure jealousy with SLUG and TURDBALL... and all their photos are noticeably photoshopped, they're that bad it sticks out like a sore thumb, so SLUG's 'attention to detail' and 'they never make that mistake', jeez, SLUG needs to look at EVERY PHOTO SHE'S IN TO SEE HOW PHOTOSHOPPED THEY ARE... flawless skin' 🚩'perfect makeup' 🚩'made to look 20 years younger'🚩🚩🚩 The errors are that bad, it's a joke, just like that 2024 Business Xmas Card... 🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮🪣🪣🪣🪣GB
It's been photoshopped so badly that the errors can be seen from outer space.
😅😅😅😅😂😂😂
Haha best comment, love it 😂😂😂
very funny comment. 😅
Will it be checked like Kate's photo shopped Mother's Day photo I wonder.
Bahahaha... I wish I said that!
Their Christmas card is horrible! 😵💫
Holiday card 🙄
Horrible
@ShelleyMunroS those children are running in the wrong direction. . Why are they running towards them lol .
That’s their Christmas card ….geez 😂
They should put out 2 cards - family and charity work.
The children have light skin and hair. Wasn’t MM complaining their kids wouldn’t get titles because their skin color was too dark?
Those children had titles from birth, they were styled as Earl Archie of Dumbarton and Lady Lilbet, accepted Rachel did want that, she wanted the same as Prince William children who are heirs to the throne. All Rachel has ever done is lie. And when the truth about the birth of those two come out, Rachel was similarly say she had to use a surrogate because the Royal family didn’t want black grandchildren.
👍
According to my High School Biology class, red hair is a recessive trait. Markle's dominant dark coloring would result in children with dark hair (and eyes). Those aren't her kids.
Too bad their hair is no longer red or pin-straight
! lol.
MM herself has light skin --- and she made that stupid comment to Oprah about marshmallow-white Archie! 🤣 Psychotic!
Amazing how Archie’s hair colour changes constantly ! Light brown, red, brown again, and now brilliant red again !
Not only different colours but this kids hair looks way more straightened, no curls & way more skinny too
Yeal, I noticed that too. It was dark when he was smaller ,now it looks lighter.
@@Katz55-t6uneither one has kinks???
and his little sister is taller than him.
People need to remember the appalling treatment meted out to a seriously ill Princess Catherine when she attempted to perfect a photo she had indeed taken of her family. She was subjected to a worldwide onslaught, when her only crime was to placate a press that would give her no peace and privacy!!
I said the same thing
Well said
Exactly
Megaliar needs to be be treated the same way her and her bully squad treated poor princess Catherine and bullied her into coming out while fighting cancer and her surgery to make a statement because of the Mega trashes lies.
Precisely! Where are AFP fact checkers now?
Watch Harry will say later...." We never said it was Archie or Lili!" 😂
“The British press said that” lol. 😂🇨🇦
😂😂😂❤❤
Fave comment.
😂😂😂
They will say the British Press said that LOL!
Why would anyone in their right mind fake photos of their children? These two are NUTS!!!
What children?
Stormy
Look Harry hands closely fake.
Whackadoodle is the correct word
Because they are faking the children.
But They haveNO Kids - they were allRENT A KIDSand herPregnancies were allFake !!!!
Considering Me-again didn't want the flower girls in her wedding (in England) to wear tights , I find it hard to believe she would let her daughter wear knee high socks in CA. Also, little girls haven't worn knee high socks since the 70s. ALSO, Lili is very tall for a 3 yr old.
Archiedoll tiny for a 5yo boy by comparison. Also still wearing the same clothes. Same a Littlebucks, only changed the pigtails to as the miracle pilot described. A waterfall to her waist, as he mam's.
I still see little girls wearing knee high socks in my area of the USA.
It's not their kids and the Harkles looked like they photoshopped their faces onto the real parents of the two kids.
@@blueberrylatte3097 agreed, the entire picture is a very poorly photoshopped creation.
@@feoltmanns7624 is it part of a school uniform?
Why doesn’t the main stream media put a kill notice on this holiday card photo?. It’s Absolutely, totally photoshopped pic . It’s like they are now wanting to be called out.
Look what they did to poor Catherine!!!! MSM stinks.
I feel like they are trolling us atp
They do play games with their pictures and if their intentions are for bad attention Allegedly MeGain could care less how it looks as long as she gets full attention Desperation!!!!! My opinion of course 🥴🥴
Absolutely perfect response!
That was my first thought how is it fair for them but not for Catherine
If William had done this there would be so much backlash, this is unbelievable
There was when Cathrine was falsed to share a photo on mothers day, while going through chemo. Why dont they just give their and the kids titles back, they can send out what ever cards they want
My heart is breaking for him😢💔
@@dawnsparks9207 that made me cry so much😢
If this was Prince Williams Card it would be a Christmas card and not a Happy Holidays but also done with class.
Giờ thì không ai buồn phản ứng về họ ,chẳng thèm quan tâm họ là thứ gì ..lướt qua ..giải trí .
How often does a 3 year old and a 5 year old look to be the same height? Ridiculous narcissistic overload
And she is further back so actually this child would be taller than “Archie”.
I thought that
I was just coming to post this exact thing! 2 years apart would be a much bigger difference in size. I have kids that are 21 months apart, and they were never this close in size.
Agree. This was the first thing that struck me. I have never seen such a big three-year-old. And Archie seems to be wearing the same clothes from another photo.
I thought that was odd too. There's about 3 years different between the two but they are around the same size.
How does Archie never seem to grow? It’s like he stopped growing 2 years ago and then Lili at this rate is going to be 10ft tall!
makes Princess Catherine's mother's day card look like a masterpiece lol
Those two kids don’t look like two years different in age. Lilly is as big as Archie.
Archie looks stick thin
He looks sickly. @@madmelwood3778
Archie hasn’t grown since last picture
I’ve just seen your comment, I said exactly the same.
@@CarolNaylor-ys3lo “Archie” has been the same for 3 years. He’s a member of the lollipop guild, apparently.
Photo was taken in April because that’s when the blue agapanthus are blooming.
That means "the kids" would have been 2 and 4 because their "birthdays" aren't until May and June. Tut, tut, RMM, you goofed again.
At least part of the photo. For sure photoshopped
@@carolbythesea so Betty must be about 6 feet by now.
Good catch
Good Catch!!!
Thank you, Mr. Sidley! Yall are so adorable! ❤
"As a mother", two things stand out: there's zero chance your children will run to you (unless they're acting), and family dogs always want to be part of the action (cue: centre stage).
@@maceyjayne Look at the distance of the beagle on the right. If real -it either doesn’t know or like Meghan
@@SookieCee83 Agree. If there is a secure "attached" relationship between child/adult and dog, it (the dog) will want to take centre stage. Fact!
So true. Kids don’t run with their arms out like that it’s so staged. That’s the first thing I thought
@@sarabrown7488 Right? In "secure" families...who does that, unless there is a prolonged absence? And even, then...?
Yes. The dogs would be jumping on the kids in excitement
I love how your Dad’s opinion is based 100% on facts, and what he see through his own professional eyes. No conspiracy theories with Kirk, and that is such a relief.
Your dad is super professional and his analysis is clear. Please thank him for sharing his knowledge
Little girls in the UK don’t wear knee socks anymore with outfits unless they’re in school uniform….. or Royal!
💯
Yes they do. I’ve been teaching for 20 years. It’s not as common but they definitely do.
@@sarahwhyld5596 Not with light weight summer dresses and not right up over the knee like that.
Little girls in the USA still wear knee socks. I used to dress my daughter this way when she was little.
Who puts a blurry photo on their Christmas card of the back of children's heads? That's just bonkers.
😂
I'm a self diagnosed dog expert lol
Anytime children are "running" dogs are all eyes on them, the dogs are showing zero excitement towards that
Yes. There seems to be zero excitement amongst the dogs.
They recognise and reflect moods especially in their pack/family
Bcos it was photoshop how to be excited😂😂😂😂
@@evelynn7827 exactly 💯
Great observation
The dogs look bored and or lethargic.
Markle and Archie are wearing jumpers and the other two are in summer wear 😂
I noticed that too.
Goos catch!
Yep
And Archibald in the pic is wearing the same clothes Eugenies son was wearing in one of their photos.
Jumpers???? 🤭 I think you mean sweaters...
Because the kids real parents want to be able to send out cards with their kids on it and they couldn’t do that if Megan and Harry showed their faces.
Meghan wouldn’t care about the real parents wanting Christmas pictures.
Faces can’t be shown because they don’t look like Markle’s, Raglands, Spencers, or Windsors.
If they were Meghan’s children, they’d look like her, pre-plastic surgery. Faces need to be hidden until they are old enough for their own plastic surgery.
Also, neither child is a red-head.
Great point!
No way that little girl in photo is three height hair etc...Your dad enters like a Dynasty hero with that music , love it.
My 3 year old granddaughter’s hair is very long, well down past her shoulders - she turned 3 yrs old in October 2024. But she’s definitely not as tall as the little girl in the photo.
@@feoltmanns7624 If She take s after he mum in the hair dept it would be curly and short due to Meghan's afro heritages , Meghan doesnt have long or straight hair until late teens and twenties when she discovered straighteners and extensions!!
I know someone with a little girl that’s 2 going on 3 and her hair is almost down to her waist.
I couldn’t wait for this video since seeing that picture!
Some other things I noticed:
Harry has 6 fingers on his right hand.
Betty has a clubfoot and is quite big for a 3 year old. She is as big as 5 year old Archie.
Meghan’s top half is facing Archie but her legs and feet are facing the opposite direction.
Plus Harry’s body and legs look off.
Peggy, YES!!! Thank you for pointing that out!! Half is photoshopped and the other AI
Good spot on the fingers
Not too long ago (NY before he flew to the U.K. for the Wellchild event?), the dimwit said that she’s supposed to be gifted with her mom’s hair and was so long that she could sit on her hair
Yes 100 percent on the feet!!! Just screenshot and zoomed in!!
will the photo agencies show this holiday photo the same energy as the Wales Mother's Day photo? will there be a k!ll order?
They only check the photos that are issued to them, the ones on social media or holiday cards escape scrutiny.
@RachelDavies-wn7ir I thought that the photo put out by Catherine was put on their social media. I may be incorrect.
Since Meghan and Harry are not working royals, maybe the press doesn't care.
@@RachelDavies-wn7ir we must issue it to them. IMMEDIATELY!!!!!
Why should there be? The Wales family are heir to the throne. They are important. This family are celebrities living in America. Totally irrelevant what they do no msm will think it's newsworthy.
The dogs back leg looks like an antique chair leg😵💫😵💫
And the right hind leg is missing.
Yes I thought that too
Yes, exactly!!!
And each dog is standing absolutely still?? C'mon. They really do think we're dumb. 😂😂😂😂😂
I had a staircase spindle come to mind. Just very odd.
That's a HELL of a swayback on that middle dog! 😂😂
That you Kirk Sidley, we appreciate your VERY keen eye and drop in visit ( and as well, the way you all love each other is so great. )
Harry's face looks like it was stuck on someone else. And has Lilibucks been wearing that dress since July 4th? In Spare, H said Mugsy made her own clothes. Maybe she could make her 'daughter' a new dress.
I’ve noticed h’s baby picture face stuck on the rent a kids
His head is too big for his body. The black dog is photoshopped in the photo too. Weird.
Did they “move” haz’s facial hair to the top of his head? He suddenly shaved because William is now growing a beard?
Harry looks constipated.
Thanks, Mr. Sidley, for your excellent analysis. It's always wonderful to have you as a star guest 🌟
❤ Aloha from Hawaii 🌋🌈! I love your Dad and it warms my heart to see you all together. God Bless You!🕉️
Thank You Ladies and Mr Sidley. The Harkles are "SICK" - The children "will ALWAYS BE LITTLE" because that's how a Narcissist "operates". A shocking photo of this shocking family.
They expect us to believe they are parents!
Yea right!!
It's quite sick really.
My thought is the summer clothes for rented girl and winter sweater for a rented boy. Plus the Diana scene recreation proves it is staged, which is really disturbing on so many levels.
They couldn't get the dogs to act excited and part of the family---they just stood there, most unnatural, looks like they didn't get the script.
Apparently they were photoshopped, at least the Harry’s black one, allegedly said by Sidley Twins’s father who is a professional photography expert. It’s not that it’s a crime to photoshop this and there, but it’s not just a retouching we are all pointing at, it’s that all of it is pure bs.
Your father is a dear. Thank you for using his expertise to educate us. How stupid do the Gruesome Twosome consider us to be?
Regarding the photo of the kids I read a comment from a person that said and I quote "lived in Montecito and that the blue acanthus and blue Mexican sage in the are blooming, that occurs April-June. THATS WHEN THE PHOTO WAS TAKEN. That explains Lily’s summer clothes, which is a different season than Meghan’s and Archie’s clothes. If everyone was present at that same time, in summer, everyone would have dressed for hot California weather."
If that photo was taken in April-June latest, that would make the girl in the photo barely three years old IF it's Lily. No three year old I ever knew grew that big.
@@sandradavies7804 I actually have more issues with the dogs... they are in so weird poses, I had a dog she would never be so relax like that in that situation of excitment.
@@tsukinoyousei That is true. If your dog is ignoring you, run around excitedly and it'll come running to see what's happening. This whole photo is shopped to the max.
Meghan has one arm thats looks 6ft long!
One of them has no hand.
Little Better looking like she is 6 years but the poor lass has a club foot!
Harry is defying gravity by the way he is squatting..and the list goes on.
Welcome Dad, good to see you and to listen to your expertise xx
ok I wasn't only one to notice the club foot look about the girl child, I also though the way the boys legs were he had Cerebral palsy
Yeah, what's with Betty's left foot?
@judyweinstock9972
Looks clubbed, poor little girl and the black dog looks like he has a hind leg in place of a front left one! Harry is drying the laws of gravity by squatting like that... maybe he was seated before he was transported out of one photo into another.
They are such a stupid pair....why not say..the boy luves with his birth mother in UK and little Better was an adoption that went wrong...either that or they have two kids as prisoners
@BlackCatPanther Exactly and thf Twins father thought he looked okay!!! I didn't..
@@patriciavines1526 I wish the truth about those children would come out already and put an end to all these games
In UK little girls would normally be wearing ankle socks with summer dresses sometimes with little frills
Exactly! And if it’s cold enough to wear a thick jumper like Archie has on, a three year old girl would be wearing a cardigan, at least.
I agree Kathy 😎
Thank you, I've been saying that all day. Plus I've never seen socks pulled right up over the knee like that. Usually they end just below the knee.
I thought of that photo of Diana as soon as I saw it.
I guess thats ehat MM was aiming for. Difference is though , that DIANA was running TO her children with her arms out for a hug .. but true to firm, MM is posed, arms outstretched and the children have to run to HER. What a fraud she is!😂😂
Nanny had to tell the kids, "Go on children... That's your mom and dad, (I think)..."
😂😂😂😂
Good one.! Archie and Lilli wouldn't be able to pick Harry and megdusa out in a police line-up.🥴
🤣🤣🤣
@@jeffmcconniel2838 their agent telling them to gleefully run towards them as if they were your own parents
😂😂😂😂 and they must have said: "Are u sure?"
There was h§ll to pay when Princess Catherine released a photo that had been adjusted and the media went crazy. This photo is so badly photoshopped that the worst amateur can see it. Archie dressed for fall, Lilly for summer. How did a 3 yr old get as tall as a 5/6 yr old? How did Meg get an extension arm? Background sharp, people low resolution. Where is the media? 🌲🧑🎄🌲
Harry looks like he is wearing a wig
That big kid is three!?
Catherine’s photo ‘adjustments’ were so minor that they were barely visible. People were pointing out just a few pixel differences, the sort of things that normal people just don’t see because they are ridiculous.
This photo however just looks false from the start. It’s so low res that it’s become blurry, many things look ‘off’, nothing seems quite right somehow. I don’t think Harry was there at all. The children’s attention and movement direction is towards Megsy of the long arm (although who knows of that really is Megsy as she appears to have changed shape, could easily be someone else with Megsys head ‘shopped on). As was said, there’s no knowing whether these children are A & L or someone else’s children who were told to run over to Megsy. The boy doesn’t look very excited to see his mother.
The dog in the middle - his tail is way down. Usually dogs with their families have their tails up.
Usually dogs are jumping and wiggling all over the place when people arrive
Good point
Are they afraid of something😂
When my daughter was 3 her hair was down to her waist & it was trimmed regularly. She also had a full head of dark brown hair when she was born, but it was strawberry blonde by age 3. So Invisibet’s hair isn’t an issue to me. It’s more strange to me that in an “exciting” moment the dogs are so calm - my dogs always want in on the action (but we’re an actual family)!
Betty is almost as tall as Archie
yet she is 2 years younger than Archie.
Archie's hair looks strange to me
@@whatadollslife Yes, his hair was super curly and long in Netflix, but now is straight.
Wasn’t it Hazbeen who said “” Betty had long dark hair like her mother Betty’s hair now looks light brown 🤫
Archie never seems to grow taller 🤔
Hello, Twins I know everyone else is saying the same thing about Lili. 1) She looks really tall for her age. 2)The sunshine is hitting everyone on different parts of their body, but not Lili? Why does she look like she's in a shadow? There should have been some sun on her head and on her shoulders. 3) Lili is not warmly dressed, but her mother and brother are wearing long sleeves. Thank you Daddy Sidley for helping out the girls with the photos!
Meghan’s foot looks wrong to me also ? Pointing towards the little girl but her upper body is pointing towards the boy ?
Age 3
They’re gaslighting us all and want us to know it. They think they’re laughing at our expense. They forgot he who laughs last, laughs best.
It has been documented Harry was angry and jealous that William was the first to be embraced by Diana’s open arms on the ship (as seen in the photo) that he kicked William. You can see this on the footage that this photo was taken.
Yes, I was about to make this same point!
I noticed he didn't look thrilled.
And may I say, I love Kirk! You guys, you are so blessed to have such a close relationship with your dad. I never had that and it's something that you wouldn't realize how vital it is for your psychological and emotional development, not because you dont appreciate it because I know you do, but because you just wouldn't know anything different. So take it from me, to have such a sweet father is a wonderful gift. ❤️
I envy their relationship with their Father, mine was horrible.
Don’t forget, the Meg also had “Betty” cosplay Charlotte one July 4th - same white dress with small blue flowers, white knee socks, and red Mary Janes.
@@thehutch7728 hates England and the monarchy - all the while using titles and dressing the dolls in British fashion.
I totally agree. When Princess Charlotte was a toddler she often wore smocked floral dresses. Meghain is trying to make Lili look like Charlotte.👑🏴🇬🇧
@@KittensWithHelmetsI know make it make sense
Your dad is adorable. The family dynamic is just so sweet.
Your dad rocks. It's always a joy (and educational) when he comes on your show for a photo analysis. I agree with him. H and his dog were dropped into the pic. As for the children, they're borrowed or rented. And MM is cosplaying Diana. Great work, Nancy & Stephanie! ❤💚❤💚
Cos playing is the name of the game for MM! She is certifiable!
That long arm thing is hilarious! Good call Mr. Sidley
3 points
Meghan does have long arms and legs.
They look like Frankenstein monsters.
A longer arm than the long limbed 5' 10" Diana, when you compare those two photos. Notice how even then William was trying to read his troubled mother's eyes.
neanderthal arms🤣
It's amazing they are in a sunny place and none of them ever have a shadow.
They're vampires..... No shadows...
They're vampires..... No shadows. 😂
Your dad is fantastic! I didn't even notice Meghan's arm until he brought it up. What I did notice is that you both have your dad's smile😊❤. Thank you all! Debbie
That photo is a travesty. Love your show and your dad's expertise. My favorites are the theme song 😅 and when you two break into song! 🎶 Keep up the good work, twins! 💞💞
20:14 That photograph of Dianna was not without a story.
Apparently Charles was thanking all the staff on the ship who had been working to take care of him and Dianna, she shot off up on deck without a word to the staff and ran to the boys,, hence the photo.
It is Royal protocol to thank the staff, and I would say that is the polite thing for any of us to do, but Dianna got the photo and Charles got the backlash for not being a caring dad.
If there is anything I am learning, it is that Charles is a very caring father, and he was brought up with protocols.
Spot on mandysmith 🙌
And good manners
Yup! It is definitely trying to recreate that Diana ship reunion photo. How pathetic but true to the Markles form.
Harry and meghan are screwing with their critics. That woman isn't even meghan. What kind of crap are they pulling?
I wondered that. I didn't think it was her
Are we sure?
I thought 'Meghan' looked like Princess Catherine this was probably the look she was going for I would like to see a blown up version to really check it all out.
Woman looks or is made to look like PofW, Catherine. Weird, these Sussex weirdsmobiles
There's something different about her hair.
Mr Sidley’s analysis is what we’ve all waited for! ❤
I love y’all’s Dad!!!!! It was a wonderful hearing his opinion! Thank you ladies and gentlemen! 🥰
Your dad is the greatest. Love seeing him and having him sharing his expertise! ❤
@@goldenpig0711 yes. Pointing out the input of the black lab an Megan’s long arms. I would have not noticed. I was so interested in how Lilly was taller and bigger than Archie.
Me too! Yay Kirk Sidley!!!
Photo extraordinaire Kirk Sidley! 🤩 Yay! What a lovely surprise to see him joining you girls tonight 👏 🥰 xxx
Yes!!! I agree! Why is she wearing long white socks in California! Also, she seems super tall for a three year old! 🥴xxx
Harry, Meaghanand Archie are wearing fleece or sweaters.
Lily is in a short sleeve dress.
It’s winter now! It’s been mainly upper sixties lately (Fahrenheit).
Same as in the july 4th pic, but with red mary jane shoes in the summer, go figure
@@MeItsMeLol I don't think they would leave it this late in the year to take Christmas card photos, they aren't recent photos in my opinion.
Pulling in the Garbage Bins is SUCH a Dad thing to do!
I also agree with your Dad that Harry and the Black Lab were photoshopped. You can plainly see the ring around them. I also agree that she will try to monetize Little Betty - and it will have something to do with the name of "Lilibet" since she trademarked the Name.
Always a pleasure listening to Kirk Sidley, the pro ☺️🙌🏼
Your Dad is methodical, and intelligent. I felt when he mentioned 'forensic' photography, that I was in the presence of someone who is attuned to the details while not prejudiced to any agenda. He was very fair in that way. A delight to have him join you today.
Ladies, your dad wins the "Father of the Century" award yet again!
Stephanie, you look so much like your dad!
Your dad is so charming...hopefully you can forgive him for exploiting you in huge adverts with no pay, and throw him a few shekels in the spirit of Xmas! Love you two, you're the best!
"Betty's" left shoe looks sort of wonky.
It sure does!
Her shoes look way too large to me.
It looks like a clubbed foot!
Six fingered Harry...thanks Mr. Sidley for your analysis of the photo. Thanks ladies for sharing! ❤
Dad is such a great sport. He obviously loves his daughters.
Didn't Hawwy say to an audience that the rented child, named Lilibet, could sit on her hair! By the way even the patients admitted that they were faking it and being paid to pretend they were patients. Hawwy has six fingers! Socks?
*I love your dad visiting. Betty's clothes are definitely Charlotte's Cosplay! The knee*
*socks in Calif? Puhleeeeeeeease. Merry Christmas Twins, Dad and Mom!* 🎄🎋
Even British children generally are not dressed like this. It’s a very traditional old fashioned look that the royals tend to like
And wasn't she wearing a blue and white floral dress in the last pic of her...over a year ago
@@madmelwood3778 *Yes, but the one*
*had longer sleeves she wore red shoes*
*just like Charlotte's.* 🙄
Mr Sidley (Dad), you’re awesome.🇦🇺😃🥰
I still don't believe those are the real children in the pic. Is Archie stunted in that pic?
Why is it OK for Meghan to photoshop and not get called out, but Catherine did it once and got blasted and Getty images wouldn't post Catherine's pic
Ladies the first thing I thought looking at the picture, was that this girl child looks like a five/six year old and that she was not dressed like a Californian child. I have experience of your lovely state from previously. Happy, Happy Christmas and a Guid New Year to you and yours. S xxx😊💖🌈🙏🏻🏴
Christmas wishes to Mr Kirk Sisley and his Beautiful Twin Daughters ❤️🌹❤️🌹❤️🌹🇺🇸🍀🇨🇦🇬🇧🎁🎅🤶🦮
I’m getting extremely tired of hearing about their children and the red hair. I don’t think either one of them have red hair. It’s a recessive gene that both parents have to have for a child to be born with red hair. The chances are astronomical that both of those children would be born with red hair
0:38
I think when a surrogate was used they also ordered the genetic qualities of the egg donor. I think those kids were ordered like you would order off a menu.
I absolutely agree 👍
Unless the mother isn't MM 🤔
Both parents don't have to have red hair for a child to be born with it, only to have the potential somewhere in their genes. Meghan has that potential through her dad.
I understand both parents don’t have to have red hair for the child to have red hair. What I said is that they both must have the recessive red hair gene. In my opinion, the odds are astronomical that both of those children would be born with red hair.
Everybody loves Kirk Sidley… and his beautiful daughters 🥰
Why are they bothering? They wanted a quiet life. A private life … so why a public photo for a Christmas card? A Christmas card for whom?
I was hoping you would check this photo out!! Love the invisible kids!! 😮
Mr. Sidley is such a lovely man!! Love him!! You 2 girls are so lucky to have wonderful parents
Just when you think we can’t love the twins any more-we meet DAD!! Love this family!!
Oh my goodness, your dad is so adorable.🥰🥰🥰
CA kids haven't dressed that way (with knee socks) since the 70's -- I know because that is what my early childhood photos look like! AND - it's the same kind of dress/outfit she put her in for the July 4th parade -- so I think Twins are 100% right -- Meghan is going to market little kids Holly-Hobby-esque/Prairie clothing.
Yep, me too…I was 3 in 1967 but I didn’t wear knee socks until 1st grade in 1970 and wore them thru 8th grade (we wore Catholic school uniforms-jumpers and then skirts, American jumpers-dresses, not sweaters).
What do little girls wear in California?
@@sandraobrien8705 Sandals, flip flops, no-show socks with sneakers or other shoes, maybe anklets.
And leggings or jeans with a cute colorful t-shirt or sweat shirt depending the weather.
@@sandraobrien8705shorts and sleeveless tops in the summer. Long casual pants and a shirt and sweatshirt in an area like Montecito in the winter.
I just had a thought: it doesn’t say those two children are supposed to be theirs. They could just be the neighbours kids or someone else’s. I wouldn’t bet on it actually being them. The girl is def older than 3.5 and to me the boy is the same age as her.
„We never said those were our children, the British press did“ - read in Harry’s horrible voice 🙃
They never announced those are their kids in the image. Could be just a family idea.
Who puts other people's kids on a Christmas card though? 🤔
@@desireeretiree the Harkles
True narcissism is the only thing they are celebrating in _that_ card.
What it says to me is, “we love ourselves, SO much! And, oh yeah…we have children…kind of…sort of.”
her feet! her feet are facing in the wrong direction!
Thank you for Father Sidley's expert analysis! That little girl is older than 3 of 3 1/2 years old.
Yes and bigger than the older child almost.
Absolutely, the kids look about the same size and age!!!!👎🏻🇦🇺
way older looking as well as very tall for a 3 year old.
Yes that is no 3 yr old toddler, and why is Archie's hair straight and red now , I've seen a picture of him with dark curly hair WTF
@@Babette-cr2zudefinitely a five or six year old, and not a 3 yr old toddler
I grew up reading the kids' magazine " highlights " and loved the puzzle searching for the hidden pieces .. Where is Harry's beard ?
Ahhh!! I thought it was just me! Hahaha!
Good catch!
And look how wide his smile is! It looks creepy it’s so oversized.
Harry clean-shaven?
With Mr. Sidley giving analysis on photographs is much better. Thank you, Stephanie and Nancy.
The great Kirk Sidley is rapidly amassing a great number of ‘daughters’ he never knew he had! What a great dad! Nancy and Stephanie you are so lucky! Blessings too, to your gorgeous and equally fab Mum!