Exactly. I have five dogs aging from 7 months to 9 years old so a very broad range of how dogs react at different ages and I can say that when my granddaughter comes to the door they all alert to her and stop and their attention is directed at her. Those dogs would be looking at those kids
@@janicekelley4020doesn’t mean it’s good or favorable attention….more people are laughing and making fun at it…and it will be MORE scrutinized than the sweet loving Mother’s Day photo Princess Catherine sent out….
This is such a give away to prove that the kids actually exist, there is nothing genuine about this photo at all and so very photoshopped that even I who knows nothing about photography can see the discrepancies
@lindamorgan4604 Not a family Christmas Card as it specifically says Happy Holiday Season. This is just to show how kind, caring and Meghan is gonna be the next Mother Theresa.
Hazbeen appears to have grown an additional finger on his right hand. It's interesting how the female child is dressed in a lightweight, short-sleeved dress with no jacket, yet the male child has a coat and is dressed for colder weather.
that is what i was thinking as well. very odd choice of outfits for different seasons. and i also noticed your appropriate choice of not using their alleged names but instead referring to them as female and male child. language does create reality and vice versa and people unconsciously factualize the claims and lies by regurgitating them.
Diana hugged William first then Harry who immediately ran forward and kicked William in the shin who was then seen saying ouch and bending down rubbing his knee! Horrible even back then!!!
He's been a jealous little boy his entire 40 something years of his life! I really despise him and will not forget him treating his grandparents so callously in their final years.
My sweet beagle hears his father's truck come up the road from work, grabs his stuffy and is wagging his tail off all the way to the front door. Excitement doubles the closer his daddy gets to that door.
Maybe the dogs don't like them, probably not because they're saddled with Harry's trauma dumping (remember all of the dogs are his therapy dogs). If the dogs were posed and the photo was posed, it'd make sense. But as usual, the picture is a mess.
@@lindawilliamson1045 He missed a few things, too. H has a 6th finger, M has an extra leg, Betty has a weird foot, & H has a melting no bearded face? 🤔
I just love the reporting style Taz, you always get your point across without being nasty. But you still call out bad behavior (H&M give plenty of fodder) And you are always a formidable animal reader.
The Black Lab looks like he was added after the fact. Others have mentioned that Lili's dress is more British than Southern CA. I am surprised Megsy didn't have Lili wear her red Balenciaga gown! This is a distraction for the infamously failed polo docu-series.
Harry dripfeeds the msm his bullshyte they repeat with NO fact checking or balance, for clickbait.Then controls with Court cases that sap their money for years to defend...They are pitiful the way they fawn over these two malicious con artists.
Dan Wooten had Paula M on a couple of days ago where she went into the reasons why Harold's story of Archie's birth is completely rubbish. I've never believed the tale they told, but Paula's very sound reasoning helped me know why. I've always believed they just went to the hospital to pick up the baby - not to give birth to one.
The press is afraid to say anything too negative or controversial or said press will be accused of the R word. MM and her sussex squad love to use the race card.
Markle has three legs in the photo: one behind Harry, and two in front, near the dog. Also, not only is Harry beardless, his face appears to be melting. Altogether, this conglomeration is insulting. To the office of the Duke and Duchess of Deception, stop it now. That's enough. It's embarrassing. Honestly.
The picture is blurry, that's suspicious enough. The photo does not need to be blurred, as the children's faces are not even seen! They're photographed from the back!
Betty is not a 3 year old child why is she wearing UK school girl clothing ? Why is Archie wearing Southern Californian winter clothing? Looks like Harry has 6 fingers, Meghan's arm is freakishly long, the black lab is floating in space.
@@stephenpmurphy591 As Taz pointed out, Betty has a club foot or at least she does in the picture. The dyed or photoshopped hair is what always gets me. It's always a surprise to what they'll look like. I'm okay with them not showing their faces but don't photoshop the back of the kids.
Such a crazy photo! You are absolutely right! Those dead standing dogs, the adults and the children who don't seem connected in any way and who are all aiming for different directions. It doesn't make sense at all.
Betty even looks older , according to someone who actually lives nearby , the blue agapanthus seen in the photo bloom in late spring so Betty might not even be quite three and that child looks older than that to me .
@@patriciakelsey3880 Typical reaction. It's damage control. When all else fails, wheel out the children and pretend to be doting, loving parents. The world is not fooled.
@@pain-killeryates5448. And let’s not forget the Baka(spelling) people who directly appealed to these two hypocrites for help,to save them from beatings and ra.e and being prevented from using their traditional lands that have always been their source of food. It’s what? 18 months or 2years since that plea was made and what has been the response from the caring,compassionate,do good deeds for others. ,we will help anyone marbles? Nothing! Nada! As a matter of interest I wonder how many more of the tribe have been beaten up, starved ,ra..ed or unalived in that nearly 2years ? Let’s have some information and transparency on those statistics just harry. Edit…markles not marbles
Just about everyone thinks it’s a heavily photoshopped photo. Even experts are saying that. It appears each dog and each person were photoshopped in! Even the weird background. The most unprofessional photoshopped photo I’ve ever seen.
Hi Taz I think they do all this crap on purpose then they can cry victims of online bullying,totally agree all done by design,but we see through their tactics.
The thing that gets me is Friar Tuck never had red hair, he had strawberry blond hair that became darker brown while he was growing up. Archie's hair goes from a deep auburn color with straight hair to a dark brown with waves.
Why do they always have to make things so weird ? Is this supposed to be a corporate card or a family card? It fails as a corporate card, too personal, fails as a family card, too impersonal. Is it supposed to be a royal card, no longer royal, just weird.
Brilliant Tash. Absolutely right. Dogs always know. Always. If this was genuinely joyful their tails would be wagging & they'd be quite animated. As it shows - all three dogs look apprehensive, tails straight down, heads a bit bowed, even a little fearful, especially the little one looking at harry. Shout out to Kirk Sidley's spot on observations too. Thanks & Much Love Em S.A🌷
I have 3 dogs. I have bruises all over me because they jump up on me all the time. If the kids are running towards the parents with that much energy, the dogs would feed on that and be right there in the middle of energy. They’d be jumping and running with kids to be part of the “pack”
@@tb54321ESATTAMENTE!! Pure il mio cagnolino Loki quando vede arrivare me o mio marito inizia a saltare e a muovere la coda come un pazzo 😅❤ è assolutamente inarrestabile e ci riempe di attenzioni e di baci. Questi 3 poveri cani mi sembrano così stranamente immobili 😒🙄
Insisting your invisible daughter is christened in the Anglican tradition but the word “Christmas” won’t come out of her dirty mouth!! Has to be “holiday”..
The fact that it wasn't from the family and the children were not included in the signature supports the fact that there are no children in my opinion!
UA-camr, Sidley Twins did a photo review of photo of Harry and Megalier with the fake kids. Mr. Sidley, a forensic photographer of 50 years, broke the photo down for us with the following observations: 1. The black dog was photoshopped in 2. Harry was photoshopped in 3. Meghan Markle's arm is photoshopped (her arm is super long 4. It's likely that the kids were both running to Meghan and Harry was inserted into the photo 5. The little girl is likely photoshopped in because her dress, and socks are common for UK children, but not common attire for US kids 6. Low resolution likely done with purpose And lastly, Mr. Sidley was asked to comment on the similarities between this photo and the photo with Princess Diana opening her arms to her children, and Mr. Sidley laughed and said the similarities are uncanny and likely done with purpose. Hope this helps.
No matter how those children came to be, the toxic duo are playing seriously sick games with these invisible children. Archie had red hair on a Christmas card 2 years ago, he had dark brown curly hair on Netflix now he has red hair again ? These two can never be fully transparent on anything , they are always playing mind games and that is catching up with them.
"Archie" here looks very like Eugenie's son on a visit to the zoo with Beatrice's daughter, Sienna. Same hair, similar (if not the same) jacket and jeans.
This was such a Lame Christmas card!!! You Nailed it Taz , the Dogs Know !!! You made a great point Taz. This looked more like an Aunt & Uncle visit than a Mommy & Daddy visit. I Love your Christmas Tree earrings, very cute !!! 🎄
Am I the only one that suspects this is a ploy to get "bullied" in the same way Catherine was genuinely bullied for the Mother's Day photo? Perhaps to take attention off of Polo and ARO and the cooking show?
Kenzie Schofield brought up a very good point that Harry and Megan probably more. Megan dropped this horrible photo to deflect from the terrible Netflix polo debacle.
How could they rip apart Princess Catherine for such small photo shops but it’s so easy to tell the Harkles is very very obviously photo shopped?!?$ WTF?!?
The dogs ,exactly what I thought They didn't look natural ,would have been excited to see children &all engaging as they live together , not natural strange
Because Private Investigation requires reason to do so. Public being nosey isn't a good enough reason. If they were claiming money from UK 🇬🇧 for the children and there was doubts about legitimate dna..then that's a good enough reason to investigate. It tells me that they are not receiving perks from the uk And there's nothing that can be done. Privacy laws
Because Private Investigation requires reason to. Not just people being nosey. Privacy laws are pretty strict. It tells me they are not receiving money from UK because if they were, then Investigation would be acceptable to Private Investigation professionals. It's actually the privacy rights of the adults that are stopping rf and journos reporting. It very obvious that the kids are not children of these 2 people in the usual sense. The rf would have been exactly like us..they knew something was fishy..but you cannot say anything. You would need proof. And to get proof..that would require you to steal medical files...not worth the jail time. Stealing medical files would have you in jail longer than charity fraud of donation funds 😊
Far more photoshopped than poor Catherine's...She was totally piled on for no good reason.. yet here are these two...intending to deceive!! Harrys beard has disappeared as has the last of his scruples.
Aside from the stupid photo of the kids, the other photos are also awful choices, and the whole layout looks cheap and tacky, like you’d pay a third rate print place to get their freelance $8 per hour “grapic designer” to whip it up in five minutes. I think Markle herself probably did it, as she did last years abomination.
I’ve been eagerly waiting for your coverage on this! ☕️ I am disgusted that the papers are saying that people calling this out are making ‘baseless claims’ and yet they absolutely tore POW apart for her pic…
I watched Sidney Twins & their Dad pointed many of the same inconsistencies in the photo that Taz did! So many inconsistencies that those of us that are not photographers could plainly see!
I am not an animal lover like you are Taz, but even I realized that these dogs are not acting in a natural way given the setting they're supposed to be in. Welcoming home children.
The whole photo is just bizarre…no tail wagging? I’ve 2 rescue Chihuahuas, and one Throwback Pomeranian, I grew up with a Great Dane. Doggos have always been a huge part of my life. I have NEVER seen pups just stand still with no emotion on their face, or in their bodies, while there is so much commotion going on around them. At the very least their tails would have been wagging, if they’d not also been trying to physically get in on the hugs. I also find it to be INFURIATING that the media picked Princess Catherine’s photo apart, and no one is saying a damned thing (other than Royal watchers) it seems, about these two clowns. Thank you for the extra video, Taz…LOVE those earrings!!! 🌸💖🌸
I think you are right, Taz. The media is bored with them, they know we're bored with them, and, really, who cares anymore about this extremely dull couple.
It's not a 'Christmas Card' It's PR and marketing. Little Betty is missing a large part of her lower left leg, H is clean-shaven & has 6 fingers, Meg has 'Stretch Armstrong arms - and if that is the real Archie, he is so skinny and malnourished. it's an obvious low-res Photoshop. It's pretty disgusting that the UK press called out a distorted plaid skirt and a wonky finger on Princess Catherine's Mother's Day photo.
Yep it’s a badly put together jigsaw puzzle- you know when you force the pieces in because you just can’t get it right - harrys beard has moved to his head his eye is missing ( maybe they lost that piece of the puzzle ) Meg - well her leg body and arm are all wrong. Lilly has odd feet and little Archie is well little and obviously feels the cold. And the dogs …….😂
The behavior of the dogs is a dead giveaway, 1000%.
Isn’t it just!!!
MM pose is a copy of one Princess Diana did
Exactly. I have five dogs aging from 7 months to 9 years old so a very broad range of how dogs react at different ages and I can say that when my granddaughter comes to the door they all alert to her and stop and their attention is directed at her. Those dogs would be looking at those kids
The dogs shy away from her, and her pose is the one of Diana's greeting William
100!!! And wagging, or jumoing in to play...unless they never play & dont know how...((sadly I have seen that 💔❤️🩹)) @slix96
If the dogs are indeed present, they're sure not eager to be.
Her dogs are afraid of her. Like everyone.
I really loathe the mainstream media. I am thrilled Catherine has stopped giving photos to them, they deserve NOTHING.
🤣
Agreed
Well, I can't agree they deserve nothing, they deserve our collective disgust, contempt, disdain.
Couldn't agree more 👏
@@ghostdoodles You are wise, I agree.
Methane said that Archie does not believe in Santa Claus existence anymore. I would say that Santa does not believe in Archie’s existence either. 🤣🤣🤣
Good one!
Ok, that's funny! Very good!
😂😂😂
😂
Brilliant 😂
It's the stupidest Christmas card ever.🙄
Look at the attention their card is getting
@@janicekelley4020doesn’t mean it’s good or favorable attention….more people are laughing and making fun at it…and it will be MORE scrutinized than the sweet loving Mother’s Day photo Princess Catherine sent out….
@@janicekelley4020Because it's comedy gold.
@@janicekelley4020bingo
Ptomoting themselves
They want us to talk about this xmas card so we stop talking about the awful Polo, American Riviera, & seperation?
Correct.
Everything they do is funny to me now. It’s one disaster after another. One failure after another 😆
BINGO.
They are trying to prove the kids exist. This doesn’t help them.
@zeldaray5562 it makes me believe they’re rented kids photoshopped in.
Someone else said it first, and I concur: If those kids exist, something, or several somethings, isn't right.
This is such a give away to prove that the kids actually exist, there is nothing genuine about this photo at all and so very photoshopped that even I who knows nothing about photography can see the discrepancies
Not in the slightest, it adds more fuel to the conspiracies, but then I think they actually want that
Or trying to pretend they are together
Why private citizens feel the need to release a dodgy Christmas card is beyond me.
Absolutely rubbish Christmas card! They are a ridiculous pair.
@lindamorgan4604
Not a family Christmas Card as it specifically says Happy Holiday Season.
This is just to show how kind, caring and Meghan is gonna be the next Mother Theresa.
@@brookecasey9037 yes well look at what came out after other Teresa died
@@brookecasey9037 But aren't you feeling the ✨Markle Sparkle✨looking at it?! 🤢🤢
Looks like a business card for Archewell....and its their self promotion.
Even the mailman usually gets more attention than them in that picture 😅😅😅😅
Hazbeen appears to have grown an additional finger on his right hand. It's interesting how the female child is dressed in a lightweight, short-sleeved dress with no jacket, yet the male child has a coat and is dressed for colder weather.
The black dogs hind leg looks like a table leg. Do they even look or think about what they post? 😅
Plus harry has hair😂
that is what i was thinking as well. very odd choice of outfits for different seasons.
and i also noticed your appropriate choice of not using their alleged names but instead referring to them as female and male child. language does create reality and vice versa and people unconsciously factualize the claims and lies by regurgitating them.
Watch Harry will say later "We never said it was Archie or Lili" 😂
The British press said that
😂
On point 😂
@@pain-killeryates5448 The Sun maybe or whoever the louse is at war with?
‘Did Megan say that?’😮
The flowering purple Agapanthus in the background indicate California in June. The girl does not portray a child having just turned 3.
Diana hugged William first then Harry who immediately ran forward and kicked William in the shin who was then seen saying ouch and bending down rubbing his knee! Horrible even back then!!!
Born horrid that one
He's been a jealous little boy his entire 40 something years of his life! I really despise him and will not forget him treating his grandparents so callously in their final years.
He was a spoilt child. He used to click the Queens guards in the shins and say ‘you can’t do anything to me. My Granny is the Queen’.
@@according2taz Absolutely correct!
Didn't he whine incessantly that his brother had a bigger bedroom than he had?
What a vulgar card, but then again, they ARE vulgar!
The media went nuts over Princess Catherine's photo editing what about tow?
Oh it’s comin’!!!!!
The Harkles aren’t important enough!
@@DeeBullock1836 It will be timed to coincide with the release of the cards from PPOW. _Someone_ will make sure of that
@ no but they’re annoying and sickeningly enough….they need to be called out from the loudest msm voices!!!
Maybe they're afraid of being called racists. Anytime the Harkle's are attacked the race, sex, or both cards are played.
Talk about distasteful.
Its nothing but sick mockery.
They certinatly deserve each other.
Most dogs would be jumping all over in such a greeting. No Beagle is quiet during an exciting moment.
Exactly. I have raised and fostered Beagles and I have yet to run across one who doesn't go manic at the slightest excitement.
My sweet beagle hears his father's truck come up the road from work, grabs his stuffy and is wagging his tail off all the way to the front door. Excitement doubles the closer his daddy gets to that door.
Maybe the dogs don't like them, probably not because they're saddled with Harry's trauma dumping (remember all of the dogs are his therapy dogs). If the dogs were posed and the photo was posed, it'd make sense. But as usual, the picture is a mess.
Truth!!! (Proud Beagle Mom)
Exactly
Harry says Lilly has Meghan’s long hair. Does he not know that those are dirty hair extensions?
😂
Mm long hair shows Henry is stupid they are extensions.
Why 'dirty'?
The Sidley Twins Father said it was photoshopped and no one was surprised 😂
I watched it! And, to be fair to their dad, it's quite seeable
@@lindawilliamson1045 He missed a few things, too.
H has a 6th finger, M has an extra leg, Betty has a weird foot, & H has a melting no bearded face? 🤔
I just love the reporting style Taz, you always get your point across without being nasty.
But you still call out bad behavior (H&M give plenty of fodder)
And you are always a formidable animal reader.
Archie dressed for winter-Betty dressed for summer!!
Exactly! I immediately noticed that too.
What kids?????????)
Attention to details much Megzie?
😂😂😂
Lilly dresses in Princess Charlottes hand me downs.
The peculiar photo reveals their strange mentality.
One thing missing from the photo is Diana hovering from the tree in a winged Mary Poppins outfit
Oh thanks for that visual. Maybe they could photoshop his mom's face onto the nightmare character in the State Farm commercials...
😂😂😂😂😂
😂🤣😂
Good one 🤣
So funny 😂
Real moms don’t splash themselves all over the Christmas card. Kids/pets are the focus. That did it for me. Photoshop is a bonus!
My congratulations to the Harkle's for having their children delivered by Amazon drivers 👏
I'm laughing out loud at your comment. Brilliant xx
😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
That’s good👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
😂
Or Amazon drones. Lol
The Black Lab looks like he was added after the fact.
Others have mentioned that Lili's dress is more British than Southern CA. I am surprised Megsy didn't have Lili wear her red Balenciaga gown!
This is a distraction for the infamously failed polo docu-series.
The press have been complict from the start in not calling out the invisible children situation, and now this obvious photoshop, they say nothing.
They are their cash cow. Simple.
What press? There are very few real journalists these days.
Harry dripfeeds the msm his bullshyte they repeat with NO fact checking or balance, for clickbait.Then controls with Court cases that sap their money for years to defend...They are pitiful the way they fawn over these two malicious con artists.
Dan Wooten had Paula M on a couple of days ago where she went into the reasons why Harold's story of Archie's birth is completely rubbish. I've never believed the tale they told, but Paula's very sound reasoning helped me know why. I've always believed they just went to the hospital to pick up the baby - not to give birth to one.
The press is afraid to say anything too negative or controversial or said press will be accused of the R word. MM and her sussex squad love to use the race card.
Diana never posted pictures of her compassionate work on Christmas cards, as far as I know. What an obscene thing to do.
Markle has three legs in the photo: one behind Harry, and two in front, near the dog. Also, not only is Harry beardless, his face appears to be melting. Altogether, this conglomeration is insulting. To the office of the Duke and Duchess of Deception, stop it now. That's enough. It's embarrassing. Honestly.
And H has 6 fingers on his right hand
Although the Montecito idle prince probably shaved his beard to take focus away from his hair plugs and now PW is rocking facial hair.
Harry looks like he's taking or trying to take a dump.
Yes! Thank you!!! There is no way in hell that those dogs would not engage with all the energy in the photo ! 😅😅😅
Little Betty looks taller than Archie suspicious
The picture is blurry, that's suspicious enough. The photo does not need to be blurred, as the children's faces are not even seen! They're photographed from the back!
I noticed that immediately
Betty is not a 3 year old child why is she wearing UK school girl clothing ? Why is Archie wearing Southern Californian winter clothing? Looks like Harry has 6 fingers, Meghan's arm is freakishly long, the black lab is floating in space.
@@stephenpmurphy591 As Taz pointed out, Betty has a club foot or at least she does in the picture. The dyed or photoshopped hair is what always gets me. It's always a surprise to what they'll look like. I'm okay with them not showing their faces but don't photoshop the back of the kids.
@@stephenpmurphy591 The black lab's rear right leg looks like it is a wooden table leg - weird. When did Harry shave?
Such a crazy photo! You are absolutely right! Those dead standing dogs, the adults and the children who don't seem connected in any way and who are all aiming for different directions.
It doesn't make sense at all.
Absolutely agree Lilly looks larger than Archie
Betty even looks older , according to someone who actually lives nearby , the blue agapanthus seen in the photo bloom in late spring so Betty might not even be quite three and that child looks older than that to me .
Not only that but her body shape is for at least 5-6 year old kid. At 3, kids are still chubby with toddler body proportions.
@@deborah85728 She looks 5 or 6
I don't know why they even release a card, no other celebrity or famous person does this.
Attention seeking. It worked.
Don’t let them deflect from polo and the cooking show and American Rivera brand. This is nothing but a bait and switch.
@@patriciakelsey3880 Typical reaction. It's damage control. When all else fails, wheel out the children and pretend to be doting, loving parents. The world is not fooled.
@@pain-killeryates5448. And let’s not forget the Baka(spelling) people who directly appealed to these two hypocrites for help,to save them from beatings and ra.e and being prevented from using their traditional lands that have always been their source of food. It’s what? 18 months or 2years since that plea was made and what has been the response from the caring,compassionate,do good deeds for others. ,we will help anyone marbles? Nothing! Nada! As a matter of interest I wonder how many more of the tribe have been beaten up, starved ,ra..ed or unalived in that nearly 2years ? Let’s have some information and transparency on those statistics just harry. Edit…markles not marbles
I'm disgusted
&my immediate thought we're dogs not reacting in The portrayed situation
Just about everyone thinks it’s a heavily photoshopped photo. Even experts are saying that. It appears each dog and each person were photoshopped in! Even the weird background. The most unprofessional photoshopped photo I’ve ever seen.
It’s almost as if it was done on purpose
@ I presume to get more attention. Not concerned about authenticity, imo.
@@according2tazthey are desperate for everyone to shout about it being fotoshopped so they can scream about bullying again.
@@according2taz Hep. All intentional.
Yep, not “hep”
Why do they even put out an official Christmas card? They’re not royalty, who cares? Even super stars don’t do this! 🤯
Totally agree with you it's a terrible Christmas card
Hi Taz I think they do all this crap on purpose then they can cry victims of online bullying,totally agree all done by design,but we see through their tactics.
Betty is always in the same clothes, looks like she’s in the 1950’s
The thing that gets me is Friar Tuck never had red hair, he had strawberry blond hair that became darker brown while he was growing up. Archie's hair goes from a deep auburn color with straight hair to a dark brown with waves.
Why do they always have to make things so weird ? Is this supposed to be a corporate card or a family card? It fails as a corporate card, too personal, fails as a family card, too impersonal. Is it supposed to be a royal card, no longer royal, just weird.
It’s not a Christmas card. It’s an advertisement for two very thick people.
Sidley Twins with their dad was brilliant!
Bravo the Sidley Twins!
Brilliant Tash. Absolutely right. Dogs always know. Always. If this was genuinely joyful their tails would be wagging & they'd be quite animated. As it shows - all three dogs look apprehensive, tails straight down, heads a bit bowed, even a little fearful, especially the little one looking at harry. Shout out to Kirk Sidley's spot on observations too. Thanks & Much Love
Em S.A🌷
Your breakdown of the photo had me in stitches. Levitating back legs, block high heels.... Great report!
That girl’s hair sure has grown an extraordinary amount since the Independence Day parade!
Looks like Betty inherited her mothers hair extensions
Wasn’t that parade picture from last year?
The black dog is added into the photo which is provable it also looks that Harry is also placed in.The girl is looking away from Harry in the image.
I have 3 dogs. I have bruises all over me because they jump up on me all the time. If the kids are running towards the parents with that much energy, the dogs would feed on that and be right there in the middle of energy. They’d be jumping and running with kids to be part of the “pack”
@@tb54321exactly!!!
@@tb54321ESATTAMENTE!! Pure il mio cagnolino Loki quando vede arrivare me o mio marito inizia a saltare e a muovere la coda come un pazzo 😅❤ è assolutamente inarrestabile e ci riempe di attenzioni e di baci. Questi 3 poveri cani mi sembrano così stranamente immobili 😒🙄
@@according2taz Harry has six fingers on his right hand. Apologies if this has been mentioned already.
I totally agree. 👍🏻🎯
It's a fantasy that the children run to greet their parents!
Quite a weird photo. I agree, the dogs are telling the truth!🤣
Oh hell no, crikey. Horrible photo. Thank you, Tazz from South Africa 🇿🇦
Why hasn't the media mentioned editing in the photos like they did to Princess Catherine? 😕
Because ... Catherine is relevant. These people are not.
Insisting your invisible daughter is christened in the Anglican tradition but the word “Christmas” won’t come out of her dirty mouth!! Has to be “holiday”..
It’s a boring card as well - more like corporate holiday card? Bizarre… so on form 😂
Well it IS 'from the office' of Harold and Fraud.
My dog would be jumping excitedly while I embraced my grandkids. The dogs def seem to be off! 😂
The fact that it wasn't from the family and the children were not included in the signature supports the fact that there are no children in my opinion!
UA-camr, Sidley Twins did a photo review of photo of Harry and Megalier with the fake kids. Mr. Sidley, a forensic photographer of 50 years, broke the photo down for us with the following observations:
1. The black dog was photoshopped in
2. Harry was photoshopped in
3. Meghan Markle's arm is photoshopped (her arm is super long
4. It's likely that the kids were both running to Meghan and Harry was inserted into the photo
5. The little girl is likely photoshopped in because her dress, and socks are common for UK children, but not common attire for US kids
6. Low resolution likely done with purpose
And lastly, Mr. Sidley was asked to comment on the similarities between this photo and the photo with Princess Diana opening her arms to her children, and Mr. Sidley laughed and said the similarities are uncanny and likely done with purpose.
Hope this helps.
No matter how those children came to be, the toxic duo are playing seriously sick games with these invisible children. Archie had red hair on a Christmas card 2 years ago, he had dark brown curly hair on Netflix now he has red hair again ? These two can never be fully transparent on anything , they are always playing mind games and that is catching up with them.
"Archie" here looks very like Eugenie's son on a visit to the zoo with Beatrice's daughter, Sienna. Same hair, similar (if not the same) jacket and jeans.
This was such a Lame Christmas card!!! You Nailed it Taz , the Dogs Know !!! You made a great point Taz. This looked more like an Aunt & Uncle visit than a Mommy & Daddy visit. I Love your Christmas Tree earrings, very cute !!! 🎄
Aunt and Uncle visiting! Perfect 😂😂😂😂
🇬🇧 mummy, daddy, where have you been for the past 3 years !
Finally an award they DO deserve - most ridiculous photoshopped photo EVER - well done the Harkles 📸 great stuff, Taz 👏
Yeah I agree. I am dog owners and there is excitement, the dogs feed off it and get excited and happy too
Am I the only one that suspects this is a ploy to get "bullied" in the same way Catherine was genuinely bullied for the Mother's Day photo? Perhaps to take attention off of Polo and ARO and the cooking show?
How hard would it have been to take the "family" and have a photo just of them? They won't even bother to do something so simple.
Delighted you made the extra video.. Was dying to hear what you thought!
So many thoughts 😂
The "offices of" 😂😂😂.
They are just gross. 🤮
I've honestly had a horrible day, but this video made me laugh so much, and made things a little better. Thank you Taz. I really appreciate you 🫂
Kenzie Schofield brought up a very good point that Harry and Megan probably more. Megan dropped this horrible photo to deflect from the terrible Netflix polo debacle.
How could they rip apart Princess Catherine for such small photo shops but it’s so easy to tell the Harkles is very very obviously photo shopped?!?$ WTF?!?
You killed me with the dogs' bum and high heels!! Thank you!! Not a waggy tail in sight?
😂 nope! The dogs were an afterthought ❤
The dogs ,exactly what I thought
They didn't look natural ,would have been excited to see children &all engaging as they live together , not natural strange
The card was photoshopped
Totally photoshopped kids!
You're right - the idea of a reunion photo instead of a family photo at home is bizarre.
Believe me, Mia...we are all perplexed.
If that black lab isn’t photoshopped in, I’m a Dutchman lol
I’m curious why hasn’t anyone hired a private detective to find out what the children look like?
Nobody really cares.
Because that is bad form. Would you want your child stalked???
Because Private Investigation requires reason to do so. Public being nosey isn't a good enough reason.
If they were claiming money from UK 🇬🇧 for the children and there was doubts about legitimate dna..then that's a good enough reason to investigate.
It tells me that they are not receiving perks from the uk
And there's nothing that can be done. Privacy laws
@ellenstrack6274 what children?
Because Private Investigation requires reason to. Not just people being nosey.
Privacy laws are pretty strict.
It tells me they are not receiving money from UK because if they were, then Investigation would be acceptable to Private Investigation professionals.
It's actually the privacy rights of the adults that are stopping rf and journos reporting.
It very obvious that the kids are not children of these 2 people in the usual sense. The rf would have been exactly like us..they knew something was fishy..but you cannot say anything. You would need proof. And to get proof..that would require you to steal medical files...not worth the jail time.
Stealing medical files would have you in jail longer than charity fraud of donation funds 😊
It is gross, inpersonable, and not at all says "Christmas "
Far more photoshopped than poor Catherine's...She was totally piled on for no good reason.. yet here are these two...intending to deceive!! Harrys beard has disappeared as has the last of his scruples.
The scenery behind them doesn't look like it belongs.
Animals definitely know no tail wagging a red flag here
Hypocrisy is the key character trait of the main stream media AND the Harkles.
This card so creepy
Aside from the stupid photo of the kids, the other photos are also awful choices, and the whole layout looks cheap and tacky, like you’d pay a third rate print place to get their freelance $8 per hour “grapic designer” to whip it up in five minutes. I think Markle herself probably did it, as she did last years abomination.
the one photo that is blurry is the one with her family. Everything else is glamour shots of her being a globalist🤣
I’ve been eagerly waiting for your coverage on this! ☕️
I am disgusted that the papers are saying that people calling this out are making ‘baseless claims’ and yet they absolutely tore POW apart for her pic…
I’m still disgusted what the mainstream media did to Catherine this year. Bastards the lot of them 🤬
@ agreed!
I watched Sidney Twins & their Dad pointed many of the same inconsistencies in the photo that Taz did! So many inconsistencies that those of us that are not photographers could plainly see!
I am not an animal lover like you are Taz, but even I realized that these dogs are not acting in a natural way given the setting they're supposed to be in.
Welcoming home children.
The whole photo is just bizarre…no tail wagging? I’ve 2 rescue Chihuahuas, and one Throwback Pomeranian, I grew up with a Great Dane. Doggos have always been a huge part of my life. I have NEVER seen pups just stand still with no emotion on their face, or in their bodies, while there is so much commotion going on around them. At the very least their tails would have been wagging, if they’d not also been trying to physically get in on the hugs.
I also find it to be INFURIATING that the media picked Princess Catherine’s photo apart, and no one is saying a damned thing (other than Royal watchers) it seems, about these two clowns.
Thank you for the extra video, Taz…LOVE those earrings!!!
🌸💖🌸
I think you are right, Taz. The media is bored with them, they know we're bored with them, and, really, who cares anymore about this extremely dull couple.
The simple fact that Archie has on a fleece pullover and Lili has on a summer dress is sus to me.
It's not a 'Christmas Card' It's PR and marketing. Little Betty is missing a large part of her lower left leg, H is clean-shaven & has 6 fingers, Meg has 'Stretch Armstrong arms - and if that is the real Archie, he is so skinny and malnourished. it's an obvious low-res Photoshop. It's pretty disgusting that the UK press called out a distorted plaid skirt and a wonky finger on Princess Catherine's Mother's Day photo.
No tail wagging 🧐 my dogs are practically ready to take flight, when saying hello 😊thank Taz❤🍁🇨🇦
Yep it’s a badly put together jigsaw puzzle- you know when you force the pieces in because you just can’t get it right - harrys beard has moved to his head his eye is missing ( maybe they lost that piece of the puzzle ) Meg - well her leg body and arm are all wrong. Lilly has odd feet and little Archie is well little and obviously feels the cold. And the dogs …….😂
The dogs were the giveaway for me 😂
What, in the world, is their endgame, when ot comes to these kids??
Great video, Taz!!
'Archie a mini foodie' is I believe Princess Eugenie's son August.
I agree. When we do see a glimpse of Archie, he sure looks like Eugenie's son.
Google "Eugenie's son Beatrice's daughter enjoy a day at the zoo" and look at the hair on the boy and "Archie" (and his clothes).
The style of 'Archie's' clothing is like Eugenie's husband would wear. I imagine their son & father might dress imicably.
Look at the hind leg of the black dog.....and Harry's shadow is double extra wide🤔
This is the hand of markle.
What an invasion of others’ privacy to have their faces slapped on a Christmas card. Bizarre.
Excellent analysis, Taz!