Supersymmetry? Eric Weinstein Challenges Terrence Howard!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 лип 2024
- Join my mailing list briankeating.c... to win a real 4 billion year old meteorite! All .edu emails in the USA 🇺🇸 will WIN!
From JRE episode
• Joe Rogan Experience #...
As a professor, I have to examine subjective claims when they are broadcast on a platform as large as the Joe Rogan Experience. Eric Weinstein does too
That’s why Eric systematically challenges Terrence Howard’s claims on JRE
I'm wary. I don't think Howard’s ‘science’ should be indulged unless it's vetted by professionals. But some (like Eric) think heterodoxy should be engaged with. Hopefully this can then open up to a wider debate on whether science has a legitimacy issue.
➡️ Follow me on your fav platforms:
✖️ Twitter: / drbriankeating
🔔 UA-cam: / drbriankeatin. .
📝 Join my mailing list: briankeating.c...
✍️ Check out my blog: briankeating.c...
🎙️ Follow my podcast: briankeating.c...
Into the Impossible with Brian Keating is a podcast dedicated to all those who want to explore the universe within and beyond the known.
Make sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode!
#terrencehoward #joerogan #ericweinstein - Наука та технологія
Should amateurs like Terrence Howard be allowed the same air time and access as professionals like me and Eric?
Yes, they should. The smallest idea from an amateur, may trigger something bigger in a professional mind. This is why eric wants to help Terrence with the proper math equations to go along his good ideas.
How would that work? Maybe a pseudoscience fair that real scientists would attend to peruse all the crazy stuff out there and see what might actually be a hidden gem of enlightenment?
More importantly I should be allowed airtime... I am the perfect mediator.
It just seems like you are so interested in gatekeeping and pushing the narrative of defend the world from stupid people instead of take the opportunity to teach someone who by the way has a larger platform and more followers than yourself.
Its almost like instead of teach Terrance and utilize his audience and gain traction for yourself you are committed to your own irreverent corner of things gatekeeping like a bitter troll.
At the end of the day you are missing out on the ablity to platform yourself and educate another human at the same time and you choose to grandstand yourself.
The real science community should throw a convention every year that invites all these guys to get a booth and present. Maybe have a contest that the prize is you get legit peer review by a specifically named scientist in your field. The Pseudo Fair.
The answer is yes, but should someone be able to take a 10 min clip of another show add nothing and monetize it?
❤
@@Redmansaid he don't need to take your permission..so shutup
@@Redmansaid of course!! It is called inteligencia...
@@PHYSICS-sz1ns You are using bad English. Please learn how to write or speak correctly.
@@PHYSICS-sz1ns You don't "take" permission
This is the internet, no one rations access, there is no ' should '
Tell that to people in North Korea, China, Iran, Iraq, Myanmar, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, UAE etc. 21 countries have banned or shut down torrenting sites. A further 21 European countries have measures in place but aren’t actively blocking websites yet. Belarus saw an improvement in torrenting as it legalized piracy from ‘unfriendly’ countries that have imposed restrictions on it due to its support of Russia in the war.
While torrenting websites are often blocked in Spain (hence why it is classed as having shut down torrenting sites), rules do permit torrenting for personal use (downloading to view but not to upload or distribute).
Belarus has a complete ban/block on pornography while Lithuania, Turkey, and Ukraine restrict it. Germany and the UK have also increased their restrictions on online pornography. Germany has implemented an age-verification system for online adult sites and is currently threatening to pull Canadian porn sites (including Pornhub, YouPorn, and MyDirtyHobby) due to their refusal to comply. The UK’s recently introduced Online Safety Bill will implement age-verification requirements for porn sites, too. And France is trying to follow suit but legislation is yet to be enforced.
Political media is restricted in 17 countries, while two countries - Belarus and Turkey - heavily censor political media. No European countries block or ban social media but four do restrict it. These are Belarus, Spain, Turkey, and Ukraine. Turkey restricted Twitter following the earthquake to try and quell ‘misinformation.’ Turkey and Belarus also restrict the use of VPNs and VoIP/messaging services. Turkey has introduced a new law that restricts end-to-end encryption, requiring providers to hand over data/decrypt data.
I'm more interested in the psychology of someone like Terrance. How does someone talk so confidently and yet being so daft. And no pls don't say dunning Kruger. This is way worse than that
Why not, though? It's exactly what it is. Terrence seems like an outlier because attention is on him but you would be surprised how many people carry around their own personal theory of everything with absolutely no proof.
He's a hyper narcissist surrounded by nothing but yes men that worship him because he's rich and famous. As a random example: Elvis lived in the same way.
@@flashraylaser157 forget about theory of everything. That is way too ambitious. Find me someone who says 1x1=2
@@sharthakghosh970 Maybe I've just lived an unusual life. Actually, I know I've lived at least a fairly unusual one. I've encountered so many people whom, upon opening up, had extremely thought out ideas or even diagrams about how they thought the universe worked. It's usually self-consistent, in the same way a new Harry Potter book follows the established Harry Potter rules, but at odds with reality despite using a lot of the same terms.
@@flashraylaser157 well just using terms that sound right don't make it right. When someone says, they have a "model" it has to account for the reality we already know and then go onto prove additional things. For this you need to know math very well. Phd level math
6:45 "I don't know what the hell you are talking about"
L.o.L. 😂
that was the best 😂😂
Terrance is on to something. You can just feel it. The flower of life is based on perfect geometry which leads to perfect symetry which tells you theres perfect math there. The universe allready has perfect math it dosent change beacause of your equations. It tells you the equations!
the flower of life has been known to the hindu faith. It's already been known to be 3 dimensional. He brings nothing new to the table and hasn't put in the work to know a single concept in any area of science. Also Terrence Howard can't read equations. lol.
More like he is on something.
Why shut out Terrence's voice? We all learn from our mistakes. Terrence is trying to make a point, but he is using vocabulary that he doesn't fully understand. I think Terrence is confusing supersymmetry with superposition when he defines what supersymmetry is for him. Superposition and fractals are fundamentally different concepts; however, they intersect in areas where quantum mechanics meets complex mathematical patterns, leading to fractal-like behavior in quantum systems.
You both are incredibly smart, but being so centrist about someone like terrence, you dont need to pick out the somewhat truths scattered around his bizare bs you start doing that with him then you have to with everyone. And to claim hes a special case is insulting to the general public
You called him out ya, but you also blew a bunch of smoke up his --- for stuff like saying its impressive hes heard of clifford algebra. Hes thrown out every science word hes ever read. To claim that shows hes smart when he didnt correctly interpret a single thing hes read is exhausting. I could read every physics journal out there but if i dont correctly infer the meaning behind any of them my vocabulary might have gotten larger but it doesnt make me smart or worth your time
Im an electrical engineer currently working in ic design. I dont claim to have your understanding of math. I know the math i need for ic design which is not much to be honest. And for industrial automation instrumentation and controls my other specialty. Which requires a good amount
I do not know clifford algebra, honestly havent had to use vectors or tensors since uni in the electromagnetism courses. Its so frustrating listening to terrence act like some kind of savant, and yes he got knocked down a few pegs, but eric maintained that belief in himself that hes a once in a generation intellect. Made him think he was special rather than a delusional narcissist
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. By saying hes smart i cant imagine what hes implying about everyone else. And to almost offer to mentor him? Do you guys know how many people would want that opportunity? Terrence is an idiot. He knows how to read and remember big words and rather than follow the line of thought in an article he picks out the words and makes stuff up. Most of which is gobledeegook. That isnt this high bar of intellect youre making it out to be. You might be shocked but i know many actually smart people who (it might take some time and building up the required knowledge base first) but could not only read the articles and know the words, but follow the stream of consciousness as well. Which is actually being smart
Dont pretend terry is special, I understand you both work or communicate at the elite level of academics. But theres alot of very very smart people in the world solving niche problems that require complex thinking and they receive very little recognition for those efforts. Dont give terry the blowhard recognition for his utter bs
you sound like sour grapes ngl.
@@Luixxxd1 He's just tired of the BS and you shouldn't be so accepting of it.
@@scripteaze i guess you are the arbiter of what is and isn't bs. Thanks for your input
@@Luixxxd1 Im just not as ignorant as you
@@scripteaze that's the first thing ignorant people tend to affirm. All i know is, if i have to affirm it, then i may not be it
What I found disappointing is that Eric, literally said what Degrass Tyson said. This one thing is cool, the rest is either garbage or offensive. With the added bonus of that Eric managed to insult Tyson, by saying he didn't get "it". This was painful to watch, Eric was bending over backwards and being UNREASONABLE charitable so we could get a drone out of this. Really? In a world where flat earth is having a resurgence, where people like Candace Owens and Andrew Tate are proudly saying, "I don't need data, I've been around". I am to put it mildly, very skeptical if this was time well spent. And honstly, how is this going to scale exactly. How many 3 hour podcast can Eric and people like him do to extract 1% new drone and fidget devices from a heap of nonsense?
Eric is too smart not to know what he's doing. It's soul-crushing to see him doing what he's doing knowing its impact. The battle is already lost. The only person treating this situation appropriately is Professor Dave, who does so with mockery. Terrance has a large vocabulary, but he doesn't understand the words he uses. He's the kind of guy who claims science is wrong while tweeting this from his handheld supercomputer. His understanding of things is fundamentally flawed. If someone had explained to him during his education that 1x1 equals 1, is exactly like saying one group of one thing is one, and that two groups of two things is exactly like saying 2*2=4, he might have grasped basic concepts and not have fabricated a rambling insane theory out his ass. It's pure insanity how we have regressed to this level as a society.
This is a terrible video. Others have done a much better job debunking Howard, and debunking Weinstein's half hearted critique of Howard. Keating's usual interviews and discussions are excellent. What the heck was this vid even doing? Apparently just going for clicks while this topic is hot.
I wish I understood what Terrence thinks he understands, it'd be wild.
@@0tedaCecapS Terrence sounds like he interested in this stuff but sounds like he took DMT and then tried to research but through obscure and eclectic routes.
@@GlobalWave1, he’s self taught that’s why. Honestly I don’t understand why people don’t see the brilliance in that. Plus it’s not like he’s seemingly unwilling to learn from reputable others.
You want to be mentally ill then.
That's not true... Peter North is always seeking a lower point.
yes...peter...north...LOL
North is probably more studied than Terrance
The legend himself. I hope he's retired on some Island somewhere. Of course, the Island is made of cocaine and little blue pills but whatever. Cheers
@@dirty_hammy True!😅
Eric didn't challenge him, he just agreed with him and nodded and humored him. It wasn't a debate, Eric just listened
Eric did what nobody else had the courage to do, an elite review without being elitist, but rather friendly and explaining that TH’s main problem is using incorrect language.
Incorrect LOGIC not language😂
@@15997359 you clearly haven’t seen the exchange
@@thatsalamebro-et8hb it’s always condescending when people who are condescending are told they are condescending. Protected positions of authority don’t like that.
He’s farming sheep
How long are we going to milk this idiocy? Let's take a breath and let's just all "Move on!"
Idiocy 😅 I think we should talk about it for as long as it takes to figure out how Terrence Howard's linchpin mathematics to create vehicles that have six degrees of motion.
I will say if we make zero truly zero and we follow what multiplication was supposed to be, which is a simplification of a addition chain 0×1=1 we have assigned value to zero... since multiplication was made to simplify chains of addition and something cannot be deleted or destroyed by nothing then its easy to understand 0×A=A under Terrence Howard's system. There is absolutely no reason why we can't have an additional multiplication table for volumetric calculation of like units... 1gallon×1gallon=2gallons. I totally agree with your sentiment about the fundamental mathematics and that's why I never claimed to get rid of our fundamental mathematical system like Terrance suggest we should and instead I suggest that everything can work together and progress in the field does not come from attacking scientists if you can't work together with the scientists and create your model to be in cooperation with everyone else then it's no surprise that the entire system goes against you like they did in this case against Terrence... cant blame them. Excluding 0 which is nothing in Terrence Howards system. volumetric multiplication of like units=(A×B)+1.... if we make the value of 0 truly nothing like it should be and acknowledge the fact that nothing cannot cancel out something and it requires a negative sum to cancel out a positive sum in volumetric calculation of like units then we don't have to exclude 0... because 0gallons×1gallons=1gallons and not 0 gallons. Nothing cannot cancel something... this is the baseline.
The exact opposite goes for Division of like volumetric calculation=(A÷B)-1 and therefore $1÷$1=0. Or 1gallon÷1gallon=0gallons just as multiplication is meant to simplify chains of addition division is made to simplify chains of subtraction.
@@Sir-.-excatly talk maybe Some could come out instead of just bashing him
@@Mindfury42 😂
The Internet is the digitization of the street corner.
Brian is very elitist. But he's forgetting that Farady, William Herschel, Srinivasa Ramanujan, Gregor Mendel, Edison and many more were amateurs. Even Einstein was a self taught amateur, he only had a post-secondary degree, aka high-school. Brian needs to calm down for a moment and think about what he is suggesting.
Basically all science before the 1900 was created by amateurs.
What we forget is Joe Rogan was interested and had him on, it’s the JRE and we are just spectators.
Sure, next week Cardi B comes on to discuss the nature of the Higgs field.
@@Sven_Dongle You're a blatant racist so why should we listen to you? Yes.. I found your twitter account and some other interesting stuff you posted...
@@Sven_Dongle, right, but why is it that the idea of an artist being capable of diverse knowledge frowned upon? Stay in your lane type of energy is projected to them with disgusting glee.
@@rekkidink Artist playing scientist and taking a steaming dump on thousands of years of the work of giants. This midget stands on their shoulders and whizzes in their ears based on some perceived racial inequity.
Silicone is not on the Periodic Table of Elements. For good reason.
Eric never lets down. Took this silly buffoon apart. It's mind-boggling the possibly mentally disfunctional Howard still keeps getting hyped up everywhere despite having been debunked and ridiculed from so many aspects by so many experts.
No please no. Unfortunately hearing anyone say this guy has a lick of intelligence proves the level of education we have in society
Thank You kindly for the chance to give my insight on all these finding and master of them in concerns of the jointed scientific knowledge of Classical and quantum Science.
Terrance is like Eric Michael Dyson. He's playing a part on "In living Color". The pseudo intellectual that thinks using big multisyllabic obscure words in rhymes makes you look smart.
You mean Oswald Bates?
@@DaveWasThereMan
lol
Yes
I knew it was Damon but couldn’t remember the character’s name.
Terrance never tried to start a car in 30 degree weather lol
The electric in your car is not the issue starting . Some batteries have water not to mention your alternator recharge the battery. Nature does not need an alternator
@@ScoreboardKeepers You make about as much sense as Howard does.
@@ScoreboardKeepers fuckin pseudo intellectuals. Probably believe in healing crystals as well.
@@ScoreboardKeepersin your body, sodium potassium pump is like an alternator working to keep the electrochemical gradient and keep your body recharged enough to fire action potentials.
@@Sven_Dongle That's how it is when the reception is a rock and not a receiver they don't make the team
The necessary dark side of free speech is that a lot of harmful and false ideas get out there. That’s why it’s so important that experts speak up when false info gets out. Eric did a good job of being civil yet firm.
Thank you Dr Keating, I love Eric. He is so smart/articulate/real. Bring us more.
Putting Eric Weinstein in against the "It's Hard Out Here For A Pimp" guy seems like a bit much, yeah? Just sayin'
No kidding! How could Terrence, who does not even know what a Lie group is, understand supersymmetry?
At least Eric admits in the end he “won’t do shit with his life”
This whole podcast was a clean-up job for Joe Rogan, he basically got conned in front of the world and didnt have the knowledge to know he was being conned. I loss respect for Joe's platform after the first terrance appearance, this was a nice job by Eric to help Joe out to get some credibility back by having an "expert" critique what was said. Never should have had airtime in the first place.
The age of the polymath is over... All hail The multidisciplinary team.
Terence Howard sounds to a scientist how string theorists sound to non string theorists.
Weinstein did an inadequate job debunking Howard's nonsense. He should have kept it extremely basic. For instance, if 1*1=2, show me the complete multiplication table for numbers up to 10. Do commutative, associative and distributive laws still hold? How do you compute the area of, say, a triangle with Terry-math? Also, which predictions can Howard make that are not covered by accepted physics? Is Howard's theory falsifiable? If so, how? There is really no need to invoke Lie-Algebra and Hopf fibrations when talking to a charlatan like that, his theory breaks up at a way lower level. And I didn't enjoy Weinstein shoehorning his criticisms of the academic establishment into a conversation about something completely different.
Dr Keating I am not sure if you have the patience and temperament of Eric w to sit with Terrence h and correct him. And pls try to control your ego 😂
have to admit, he's more interesting than the legit boring professors.
Which means he’s definitely wrong.
Eric did a great job with Terrence.
ANYONE SHOULD BE “ALLOWED” to discuss a theory. One thing that I’ve started to think is that a Unification Theory may be eluding us because a true unification may actually “Look” different depending on the observers view-point (ala double slit). The process we have now is fierce competition amongst physicists who may very well be able to gain ground by collaborating on the “last 10%’ of their theories, where they diverge and/or break down. It seems likely that by examining the divergence, a “missing link” may be found. Brains works in mysterious ways. Terrence may be proof of that. While some of what says is far from textbook, and sounds a little “out there”, he’s obviously a deep thinker on some level and doesn’t come off as “crazy”. Sometimes mental information is hard to express in mathematics, imagery, speech. The computing power and creativity of the human brain is emence and far from being fully understood. Many famous scientists have contended that a mysterious “download” of information, led to their epiphanies, which in turn resulted in major break-throughs. I have a theory of gravity that came to me in an epiphany, that seems to be a bit of a missing link to many T.O.E.s that I read about. I’m not a physicist, or even very good at math and no doubt would be hard pressed to fully verbalize my concept, so I’ll never be able to express my concept, which could potentially, at the very least,offer a different perspective that may provide a bridge toward unification,for someone who is able to prove the math. If I’m totally wrong, I’m ok with that. I’m not crazy and don’t want to be perceived as such so I keep it to myself. The point is, it may be important, and necessary to examine alternate thinking. There may be just one kernel, that could I unlock a universe.
Terrence Howard is delusional
I really think some actors think they have become all the people they play, that other people wrote the words for and they recieve mountains of praise and some switch in their brains tells them all the roles they played were real life experiences... They ARE a merger of all those people and that their every whim must be brilliant insight. Terrance is clearly an extreme example of this... The sheer confidence in absolute nonsense he has.
Terrence Howard drives a lot of clicks
And China sees more daily how pathetic America truly is.
The overconneected and free association is classic apophenia. Ironically Weinstein diesnt have the words or knowledge of this and so offers far more credibility (clout motivation aside) to Howard than he deserves.
honestly revolutionary ideas are faced resistance before being accepted. For example, the concept of zero and negative numbers were once controversial but are now fundamental. Similarly, non-Euclidean geometry, which contradicted centuries-old Euclidean principles, eventually revolutionized mathematics and physics. Terence Howard’s theory, though currently unconventional, could represent the next revolutionary step in understanding arithmetic.
Mathematics is not restricted to a single set of rules. Different systems, such as modular arithmetic or matrix algebra, redefine operations in ways that diverge from conventional arithmetic. this could be interpreted within a new system where multiplication operates under different axioms. In this system, the product of 1 and 1 yielding 2 could be a valid result, similarly to how imaginary numbers operate within the complex number system.
bro think about contextual applications where operations yield non-intuitive results! For instance, in certain algebraic structures or under specific conditions, the multiplication of elements does not follow standard rules. If we define a unique context or set of conditions under which 1 times 1 equals 2, this assertion could hold true insides that specialized framework.
Then Weinstein says" Terrence you keep worrying about what things mean" Bro philosophy of mathematics OFTEN explores the nature and meaning of numbers and operations. Terrence's theory invites a philosophical discussion about the essence of multiplication and numerical identity. By challenging the conventional result of 1 times 1, he is questioning deeper assumptions about how we define and understand mathematical operations, potentially leading to new philosophical insights.
physics and engineering, dimensional analysis sometimes leads to results that differ from straightforward arithmetic. Multiplying two physical dimensions (length X width = area) fundamentally changes the nature of the result. Howard’s theory might be seen as an analogy where multiplication within a certain theoretical framework or dimension results in 2, not 1, thereby offering a new interpretation of multiplication in a different dimensional context.
his claim forces rigorous testing and exploration. By challenging a fundamental arithmetic principle, he stimulates the scientific community to explore and validate new theories. This process, even if it ultimately disproves his claim, strengthens mathematical knowledge and could lead to unexpected discoveries.
if we were trying to move forward instead of "killin" everyone that introduces a new idea, we could for example alter the axioms of arithmetic within a controlled framework, we could demonstrate scenarios where Howard’s result is consistent and logical.
Sigh....
Three questions.
1. Complete?
2. Consistent?
3. Decidable?
Sigh....
I am affected by the Dunning-Kruger effect. I acknowledge and I accept that. Anyone else. **Crickets**
But existing math is incomplete, inconsistent and undecidable. Proved by Cantor, Gödel, Russell & Whitehead ...
@@starling- Trust the maths.🤔
@@starling-the same math that allowed for the phone you’re using to type this?
why still all the attention around Terrance? should we simply move on? I don’t know how many video content have been created around this Rogan interview 😅
Does Eric work for Peter Thiel, the guy who is financing JD Vance's political aspirations to be Trump's VP?
The people that Terrence Howard have spoken with in the past, have a small amount of knowledge thst Terrance is talking about. They much more knowledge of thier own scientific field's.They can speak to what Terrance has , how ever they do not know enough about it to relate to it...
He really just politely let TH know that he doesn’t see. to understand what SS actually is, and is using some other vague definition or concept that he’s invented for himself.
When are scientists going to figure out that the changes in the measures of time and distance due to the amount of gravity in the vicinity change the speed of light relative to our measures of time and distance where we are? Scientists can’t figure out that where gravity changes time and distance it changes the speed of light.
Space is also not flat in the measures of time and distance in larger scales just like the Earth is not flat on larger scales. Light MUST indeed travel at the speed of light C. When distance is stretched light must travel that distance in the time determined by C. That means the light is traveling faster as perceived by us in a more contracted frame of reference. Add to that the fact that a second passes by faster away from the center of mass which increases the speed light MUST travel even more. It’s not complicated. It’s so simple. It’s the very reason things appear to be moving faster than the speed of light moving away from the center of the galaxy because they are moving faster yet without exceeding the speed of light. I don’t know why that is so hard to understand.
There are three rates to consider. 1. The diminishing effect or draw of gravity away from the center of mass. 2. The increasing rate of time away from the center of mass. 3. The increasing measure of distance away from the center of mass.
Speed is measured by time and distance which change and that changes the speed of light and causation. Distance gets longer without gravity and time goes by faster, both of which combine to speed up causation. The light has to arrive at a farther distance faster when distance is stretched *and* time also goes by faster. *Then* there is the first thing to consider and that is the diminishing draw of gravity which means things eventually slow down the farther away they are from the center mass of a galaxy. (It's not complicated.) 😎
Redshift happens when light leaves a galaxy. Blueshift happens as light enters a galaxy. All things being the same, the light will be redshifted and then blueshifted back again. Except we already know galaxies are different sizes. The distant galaxies that we can see are very large and the mass between here and there is large causing more redshift than our small galaxy can blueshift back to its original spectrum. The more distant a galaxy is the more accumulated gravity there is causing more redshift.
@@JungleJargon NICE
NICE
4:09 12 bubbles meet.
2D surface is flower of life. 2 views of surface tension. Both exist independently relative to each other
Well, the Oxford Student Union seems to think so and so they invited him to speak to them with great respect. However, I think his biggest platform was the Joe Rogan show and Joe allows most things that can be hyped.
great compilation!! just a suggestion. the sound effects are not necessary. bit distracting. those woooosh!
I hope one day for Brians' sake, he grows up and resolves his daddy issues so he can see truth clearly when it's offered by visionaries such as Terrence and Eric alike. Sad really. I truly pity him.
What does he talk about? I can make more symmetric figures out of symmetric triangles for example, it doesn’t prove anything. Yes we can make shapes out of other shapes, it doesn’t mean anything
Nuts, Weinstein should be telling him but he has his own podcast & Joe gives him a platform. Joe can't be to bright. 😂😂🤑🤔🤪🤪
This channel is going downhill. Please don't give a voice to people like Terrence Howard.
Focus on theories that have an actual chance to be true.
Watching the discussion you are showing, Eric says " I want you to show me the equations" and Terrence says " geometry is its own proof " and brings out his models. Why do you need equations to prove something if you have a real life model of it? Also if something in math cannot exist in real life why do we need it and is it causing the math to deviate from reality such that it is useless for proof in real life?
Does TH have any experimental data for his theories? This is where rubber meets the road.
Basically because it is new, and. not in the fields that they have master, only touched on while in their own Fields of studies. They may have also touched on the same areas of studies as Terrence Howard. As a required class or in the studies of Mathematics and Physics more so. This is this on the borders of two different science',s . Which Alps crosses over in to what they do also. In each of their fields of study. This is border line Classical Science and Quantum Theory. Not using the machines, or the physics it is more ..Almost being explained to them in complete Quantum Theory only.
Google put an end to most guys like Terrance & Steven Seagal. But, sometimes they break through.
Also, by the facts of how Terrace Howard given to the people in or of science thst he has been trying to explain. It is not being spoke to as quantum theory or received that way. It is structure and based on new ideal that come from quantum theory.
Nice work Brian
Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/list
It didn’t help they opened the bottle of booze to try and make him more comfortable. Just as an experiment could Brian and eric just dig through all his work and see if there is a seed of an idea. I think its all shite but, you never know
Eric, with his big heart, saw an opportunity to help mend Terrence Howard’s reputation. Unfortunately, I don’t think it worked.
@@tcarr349 I mean Eric himself said he didn’t know who Terrance was before seeing him on jre so he has zero benefit in helping Terrance
“mend” his reputation. I don’t think Eric is so arrogant to have this position in his head. I think he is using this opportunity to have a platform where every idea can be challenged and his primary focus and problem isn’t with Terrance at all but the string theory.
@@umarhonkhamidhanov6172
Sure, it’s possible. I don’t know Eric personally; I was just speculating.
Eric is a phsycopath, just like the rest of these camera facing freaks.
6:36 debate is about surface tension interaction between expanding surfaces of light
You need to somehow prove your claims...
I have really enjoyed Dr. Keating content in the past but this is 10 minutes of Joe Rogan’s podcast with absolutely nothing adding. I hope this is not the direction he continues to go.
In physics matter and energy cannot make or direct themselves. So there was a time when matter and energy were made as well as time itself since measurable time can’t exist without a great amount of matter. This means there was a time when time was made in the not too distant past. This shows that every physical thing is the result of a Creation.
Only your Creator can perfectly cover for you Himself and remake you again from the inside out by the power of His true word as no one else ever can. This is the only absolute truth in existence.
Makes sense. But who created such creator? A being so powerful to create universe must be extremely complexed. We need to find out who created such being.
@@bigbhasad9974 The Creator has to be infinitely powerful in every way. That’s what the evidence shows.
@@JungleJargon but who created such powerful creator? We need to know. A being that can bring the entire universe into existence couldn’t have just came out of nothing right? Something must’ve created it.
@@JungleJargona being so powerful must also have a creator.
@@bigbhasad9974 No, you can’t have an infinite regress of creators. There has to be an infinitely powerful and perfect Creator that is in total control so as not to be destroyed or self destruct. The smallest particle requires an infinitely powerful Creator since it cannot create itself and it has to come from a greater and greater power.
T Howard right but the other guy acts to smart that he thinks he know it all lol he wasn’t wrong but he was wrong bout Howard
I thick how has been using this concept in his presentation of his newly found ideals, using the two combined scientific knowledge. As more of Classical and less of Quantum. To express his finding. The combined science allowed him to do this, because they are interchangeable.
I do not understand the premise of trying to mock Terrance when he was giving his explanation on the possible relation between electricity with it's associated decrease of resistance in colder temperatures, and the geometries presented in the FOL with the idea of representing a force the moves freely in colder temperatures as a concave geometry? Sure, trash his delivery. But the idea to attack the substance of his presentation shows a lack of... something
He's a fraud who can't even remember what fiction he's trying to steal. GET DAN WINTER ON. THEORIA APOPHASIS, ANY OF THOSE GUYS. TERENCE CAN EAT CRAP.
I thought you were going to comment on this. It’s just a twist of Joe Rogan
Brien you should also invite jim Carrey. He also have good ideas of his own. Like tetrahedron
oh dear. What utter nonsense from TH.
Why do you say that?
@@DrBrianKeatingbuddy. You’re contributing to the decay of the trust in science. You’re contributing to brainrot. With all your wooo. Sean Carroll is too nice. Putting up with the likes of you and Eric.
A polymath with an elementary school education 🤷♂️
Terrance have strange eyes :)
Mr keating is so slaty 😂
Dear BK, your elitist approach to science makes you less credible than TH with all his mumbo-jumbo. "I am right because I have a scientific pedigree" is a classic logical fallacy which you never hear from true scientists like Einstein, Dirac and Feynman.
@@galveston8929 Brian has never insisted he’s right due to his scientific credentials. In fact, he wrote a book called “Losing the Nobel Prize” that openly talks about his mistakes, ambitions, ego, and ultimate humiliation. You should check it out.
@@tcarr349 you obviously haven't listened to his recent exchange with Eric Weinstein on Piers Morgan's "Uncensored".
@@galveston8929 I will. Thanks for the recommendation
@@galveston8929 I watched the interview twice, and Brian never said that.
@@galveston8929 People love to throw their unsolicited two cents into the ring, not realizing it’s not even worth that. They build these parasocial relationships, thinking they know these public figures intimately because they’ve consumed all their content. But really, it’s like trying to understand a book by just reading the cover. They jump to conclusions, make baseless assumptions, and project their insecurities onto every post, tweet, and interview.
Defending against this tidal wave of emotional, fact-free commentary is like trying to argue with a hurricane. Anything you say can and will be twisted to strike a chord with someone’s fragile ego. It’s a no-win situation. In the end, it’s a reminder that the internet is a funhouse mirror, reflecting a distorted version of reality where nuance and substance are often left at the door.
Terrance Howard is that crazy addict on the train that you accidentally engaged in conversation.
Interesting shirt.
Who is he anyway and what kind of drugs does he take? Respect to Eric for remaining so polite in the face of this nonsense.
It was not uniformly kind though. I wished to hear more Terence's explanations. With good questions there was potential for better. But thats what we got now. I still dont understand where Terrence got the duo / dewer decimal system, for instance. In his 162 page book there is no such. Only Statter's system is menytioned...
So what happened to all the covid experts that were wrong? 100% safe and effective jab that stop transmission?? Lol we all know how it is now.
Eric is also a charlatan 😂
@@MichaelBrown-me3bh a charlatan with a PHD from Harvard!
@@AfrikanGod1 who’s since been kicked out of academia
@@MichaelBrown-me3bh by who?!
@@AfrikanGod1 by your mother