Future of A.I. and quantum computing

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @ceceropanini6644
    @ceceropanini6644 Рік тому

    Kudos to scientists, architects and engineers!! Such a beautiful idea. We know the hurdles to overcome… we heard about the case studies how success achieved by the excellence of the team. Obviously, there were hindrance of the junior architect like Santanu Sinha, and a bit dodgy stuff by Aniruddha Dasgupta, but it was the amazing team work that has overcome all the difficulties! Hats off!!

  • @guillaumerenou4188
    @guillaumerenou4188 Рік тому +4

    Very clever who masters the subjects.

  • @sandraspidle5972
    @sandraspidle5972 Рік тому

    This sounds amazingly clever, I only hope the operators are always operating in a kind and good mindset.

  • @tankburn
    @tankburn Рік тому +3

    When we solve the measurement problem, its going to get sooo real.

  • @bartoszbarejko9179
    @bartoszbarejko9179 Рік тому +2

    I was holding in my hand The realy Graphene it was 0⁰000.01 Ohm resistence but super Conductive in room tempetature with its own electrons spinning. IT IS 1000 /10 Years to come alive. IT IS up to You.

  • @sofiaalmeida4447
    @sofiaalmeida4447 Рік тому

    Orgulho do Brasil

  • @LauWo
    @LauWo Рік тому +5

    She already changed his first question. And only answers 'her own questions'. This is marketing, not honesty.

    • @jay_stack1270
      @jay_stack1270 Рік тому

      Hhahaha you observed that lol... she switched it.

  • @francisbalemansj635
    @francisbalemansj635 Рік тому

    Real time interview

  • @112233JORDAN
    @112233JORDAN Рік тому +1

    Craxy how AI and Quantum computing are both becoming mainstream in our lifetime. It could be great, or it could result in serious issues like job losses and even more concentrated wealth (most likely result some of both imo). That's not even going into the possible political issues. Bit it'll definitely free up time for humans to deal with and learn more complicated things.

    • @guruware8612
      @guruware8612 11 місяців тому

      always this job-loss paranoia, it was the case with other new tech, like gas-turbines, computers... we are still here.
      yes, finally we can spend time to learn things, like that the earth is NOT flat.
      but with ai, there will be no more need to learn anything when such machines are better and gazillion-times faster at anything.

  • @ahsanmohammed1
    @ahsanmohammed1 Рік тому

    Quantum’s effect on generative AI models?

  • @walowaiyesh
    @walowaiyesh Рік тому +1

    She ducked the opening question, "What is Quantum Computing?"!

  • @krandaman1
    @krandaman1 Рік тому

    He's a great interviewer, but there's a gap between technical and real world

  • @TheMatheuspaje
    @TheMatheuspaje Рік тому

    Brazil!

  • @user-zf3mb2rh9n
    @user-zf3mb2rh9n Рік тому

    Anything tony, I tell you anything u wanna know!
    -Matt bevilaqua

  • @anianait
    @anianait Рік тому

    talked mainly about quantum computing, less about AI

  • @Lantertronics
    @Lantertronics Рік тому

    Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Computing: the two most overhyped technologies of our time combining to drive the hype cycle to infinity.

  • @matthewfranzen1339
    @matthewfranzen1339 Рік тому

    Quantum should be able to tap singularity; no one can create disharmony...if you already know what is going to happen before it happens...😮

  • @22guru
    @22guru Рік тому

    Awesome

  • @SMP2059
    @SMP2059 Рік тому +1

    You need more cubits to build an ark

  • @benjaminbarry5589
    @benjaminbarry5589 Рік тому +3

    How is Brazil not having a better economy with women this smart?

  • @a-k9161
    @a-k9161 Рік тому

    Who's this lady. She looks like Albanian.

  • @gerardvongyw670
    @gerardvongyw670 Рік тому

    She knows how KISS keep it simple .s......😂

  • @guruware8612
    @guruware8612 11 місяців тому

    asking a manager (marketing?) about technical stuff, lmfao.
    but she nicely memorized the questions and her answers. at least one skill noticable.
    they always fail to mention things like pysical and logical qubits, you need several physical ones to build a single logical, so that number of 433 isn't that impressive.
    any idea how much of that incredible ammount of 433 is needed for error-correction. even less impressive then.
    why not invite an engineer to explain engineering stuff ? what does missus marketing really know about that ?
    latest estimates are, that we need minimum a million qubits to make, not a general Q-puter, but at least something usefull.
    we all know how good humans are with predictions.
    comparing classical computing with quantum computing is the next nonsense you can do. you cannot compare speeds because they do unrelated things, one can't do what the other does.
    you could use relais from the 50's to build a computer to do some basic multiplications, but will the comparison be useful with a computer running photoshop ?

  • @simongibbs3601
    @simongibbs3601 Рік тому +1

    Guy is nodding without the slightest clue what she is saying😂

    • @guruware8612
      @guruware8612 11 місяців тому

      ya, but she also has no clue :)

  • @11kilo
    @11kilo Рік тому

    It's so obvious this is scripted. C'mon guys!

  • @prepare_1536
    @prepare_1536 Рік тому

    Cellframe. $Cell