Osprey: The World's Largest Quantum Computer

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 81

  • @KanedaSyndrome
    @KanedaSyndrome Рік тому +52

    it baffles my mind that this few people watch this. Some of the most important work and achievements in the world, and it has 1300 views only after 5 hours.

    • @nelange
      @nelange Рік тому +9

      Quantum computation is years, maybe decades, away from practical application (i.e.: generating profit for a business). It has been estimated that as many as a million qubits may be necessary for a quantum computer to solve a real problem that people care about. Unless something appears out of nowhere - new physics, novel qubit design, etc. - scalability particularly around error correction remains a major dilemma. Current approaches to Q.E.C. simply don't scale to several orders of magnitude needed to make this tech. useful. Just a friendly warning: This is one of THE most hyped technologies on the scene today and a lot of dead ends, failed startups, and bullshit marketing await us.

    • @LydellAaron
      @LydellAaron Рік тому

      Agreed. Perhaps we are the few who have the true interest?

    • @upop53
      @upop53 Рік тому +3

      Due to modern tech and our own personal interest this information is very easy to access. However the average person has no idea how hard it is for asml to fit more transistors on a chip. Since we are interested in this field of research we are early to the party so to speak. In other words no one cares about a problem they don't know exists

    • @pianowhizz
      @pianowhizz Рік тому +2

      They’ll watch it when someone breaks PKI!

    • @thomasfitzpatrick8987
      @thomasfitzpatrick8987 Рік тому +1

      @@nelange maybe but these guys seem to be doubling the qubits every year. So less perhaps only a decade? All very interesting nonetheless.

  • @lystfiskerlars
    @lystfiskerlars Рік тому +21

    Would be great to talk about its performance, what it can do, more about architecture etc...

  • @puffinrock2871
    @puffinrock2871 Рік тому +3

    Things are getting interesting at IBM quantum. Can't wait to see how things progress.

  • @GavinM161
    @GavinM161 7 місяців тому

    Great video and as Jerry says, an exciting time at IBM. Glad to see Big Blue is still at the cutting edge of not only research but proper engineering too.

  • @vinniscarboni4095
    @vinniscarboni4095 Рік тому +3

    Great job Jerry....working on the heat fix. Thank you Olivia for the lesson today.

  • @Cardroid
    @Cardroid Рік тому +2

    these are great.. more of these would be great!

  • @DanielJanzon
    @DanielJanzon Рік тому +6

    Regarding 1:39 "it's fully connected between all of those 433 qubits". Does it mean you can get all of them into one and the same entangled state?

  • @mahmudashik
    @mahmudashik 7 місяців тому

    Has anyone noticed the "Domain of Science" poster they've put up? It's great to see!

  • @alighasemi4655
    @alighasemi4655 Рік тому +4

    I love the PhD period reminiscing, It seems that talking about Hero devices opened some healing wounds!

    • @qiskit
      @qiskit  Рік тому +8

      youtube interview/group therapy

  • @ArtNeutro8
    @ArtNeutro8 Рік тому +5

    Amazing.

  • @minsapint8007
    @minsapint8007 Рік тому +1

    "agile hardware development" is a fantastic description

  • @ONRIPRESENCE
    @ONRIPRESENCE 6 місяців тому

    It was nice seeing Jerry at lunch. I keep meaning to tell him that I met his PhD advisor Rob over email a couple years ago lol. The time will come :D

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
    @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 Рік тому +1

    Psi, the wavefunfunction, is understood as matter actually turning into space, and according to CIG Theory. Thus, Superposition is readily understood. So, Quantum Qubits are understood as new space, 0's and 1's. An introduction to CIG Theory can be found by clicking the link above. Thank you for this video. "Let's Go Quantum" !

  • @bhuvaneshs.k638
    @bhuvaneshs.k638 Рік тому +3

    Any books or courses to shift from RTL design to Quantum hardware?

  • @saskiavanhoutert6081
    @saskiavanhoutert6081 Рік тому +1

    Quatum computing is with the Qubits transfer (transport) the fastest way to do transmitting of data.

  • @simplifiedpodcast1
    @simplifiedpodcast1 Рік тому +2

    Incredible 🔥🔥

  • @user-francescob
    @user-francescob Рік тому +1

    A "chip" is not a "computer." It's the heart that runs the logic, but you need lots more to make a quantum computer - way more than a classical/discrete computer. Osprey is truly a significant development, but we need breakthroughs in physics and material science to create quantum computing chips that can operated at "close to room temperature." A nicely chilled data-center should be the next milestone. I'm not holding my breath for a home QC sold on QvC ;-) But I want one in my lifetime!

  • @realdarthplagueis
    @realdarthplagueis Рік тому +5

    So, how many effective qbits do we need to break RSA with 1024, 2048, 3072 and 4096 bit key sizes?

    • @avgvstvs96
      @avgvstvs96 Рік тому +1

      4

    • @pianowhizz
      @pianowhizz Рік тому +3

      The recent Chinese paper suggests 372 qubits is already sufficient to break 2,048-bit RSA.
      If they proves true, then I’m guessing Condor will own 3,072-bit RSA.

    • @bhuvaneshs.k638
      @bhuvaneshs.k638 10 місяців тому +1

      Millions of physical qubits

    • @bhuvaneshs.k638
      @bhuvaneshs.k638 10 місяців тому

      ​@@pianowhizzdid they break RSA?

  • @ponmuthusenthilkumar
    @ponmuthusenthilkumar Рік тому +1

    can we know more about noise in this processor ?

  • @Cdictator
    @Cdictator Рік тому +1

    How many algorithmic qubits does it equal to regarding its 400 qubits?

  • @williambryan356
    @williambryan356 Рік тому +3

    Love this technology. Wondering when we will see output in the form of medical, communication, and transportation discoveries. I long for that day.

  • @tier1recon836
    @tier1recon836 2 місяці тому

    Can we make available on ibmq now please

  • @TheBanterlorian
    @TheBanterlorian Рік тому +4

    How do I get one of those Osprey hoodies 👀

    • @willscoolmusiclist
      @willscoolmusiclist Рік тому

      Was just about to ask that and maybe a T-shirt or singlet!

  • @Cmcmillen77
    @Cmcmillen77 Рік тому

    We’re did they get the qubits from though and how do they count them like what?!

  • @kasulefrancis23
    @kasulefrancis23 Рік тому

    It may not apply but is it possible to apply swarm logic technology to quantum computing in stead of connecting single qubits ,we could control many more ?????.

  • @LydellAaron
    @LydellAaron Рік тому

    433 fully connected, heavy hexagonal, fixed frequency qubits. Awesome.

  • @Frobard
    @Frobard Рік тому +8

    Does it work? If so, then please show me a practical example of running a program(?) and getting the result. Not just a lot of words of how fantastic it is.

  • @PiRaHelTur
    @PiRaHelTur Рік тому

    Thx you

  • @jananiananthanarayanan4794
    @jananiananthanarayanan4794 Рік тому

    Amazing!

  • @saikarumudi
    @saikarumudi Рік тому +1

    What book is that on the table?
    I can see it reads "Lectures on Physics", who's the author.

    • @Zafford
      @Zafford Рік тому +4

      Richard Feynman

  • @Vinylll04
    @Vinylll04 Рік тому +2

    I absolutely love this! I’m currently in high school and did a mini thesis on quantum computing very roughly explaining it, I still have a lot to learn, is there any material textbooks or place you recommend for learning more?

  • @smartysmarty3858
    @smartysmarty3858 8 місяців тому

    03:01 Osprey superconducting transmon qubits

  • @youtubehatesfreespeech2555
    @youtubehatesfreespeech2555 Рік тому

    Can someone explain to me the idea of Oracle in quantum computing! Knowing what the function does but not knowing the specifics!?? What is the main function and why it's helpful?

    • @youtubehatesfreespeech2555
      @youtubehatesfreespeech2555 Рік тому

      @FreeMathSolutions You apply a function you don't know what it does to get an answer you are searching for? Is that right in simple terms? But if you don't know the answer, how do you know you've got it... assuming you are searching for the biggest value in a list of trillions of items?
      Thanks in advance!

    • @youtubehatesfreespeech2555
      @youtubehatesfreespeech2555 Рік тому

      @FreeMathSolutions How does balanced/constant f(x) help me with finding the biggest value in a list?. I was interested in specifically this scenario! (Grover's algorithm)
      The application of Oracle just seems too arbitrary in the case I am describing. It's the average reduction of amplitude and increasing the amplitude(amplitudes amplification) of the marked item but how does the oracle knows the marked item considering the Oracle makes the initial rotation of the item we seek, then as a result the average amplitude is decreased and then we do another rotation which increases the amplitude of the marked item so that increases the probability of finding it.(of course a couple more rotations might be needed). We start out in the state of superposition... before the rotations begin!
      My question is how is the oracle meaningfully introduced in the whole algorithm.? It seems arbitrary to me! How do we know what exactly are we introducing?

    • @youtubehatesfreespeech2555
      @youtubehatesfreespeech2555 Рік тому

      @FreeMathSolutions Just don't respond if you don't want to!

    • @somebodyelse2192
      @somebodyelse2192 Рік тому

      @@youtubehatesfreespeech2555 ...

    • @youtubehatesfreespeech2555
      @youtubehatesfreespeech2555 Рік тому

      @@somebodyelse2192 .........

  • @sciencefordreamers2115
    @sciencefordreamers2115 Рік тому

    Great!

  • @nernaykumar1481
    @nernaykumar1481 Рік тому

    Awesome

  • @nicksandoval158
    @nicksandoval158 Рік тому

    cooL!

  • @pianowhizz
    @pianowhizz Рік тому

    If quantum computers break PKI then how will people authenticate with IBM cloud services?!

  • @zachpeters4253
    @zachpeters4253 Рік тому

    Only, it's not the largest QC by standards of quantum volume

    • @thomasfitzpatrick8987
      @thomasfitzpatrick8987 Рік тому

      Which one is? Who's doing best? In your opinion. Are these commerical yet?

    • @zachpeters4253
      @zachpeters4253 Рік тому

      Quantinuum's H2 system! It is commercial

  • @foodiepanda6281
    @foodiepanda6281 Рік тому +2

    why she sound like thaaaattt

  • @bruceli9094
    @bruceli9094 Рік тому

    US military is 50 years ahead of the world.

  • @bobsyeruncle4841
    @bobsyeruncle4841 Рік тому +1

    what's with the croaky voice i hope AI fixes that.

  • @stevechance150
    @stevechance150 Рік тому +1

    How is it not World's Largest?
    Seriously, "World Largest" sounds horribly incorrect ".

    • @LoisoPondohva
      @LoisoPondohva Рік тому +1

      It is just a phrase.
      World best, world largest.
      Doesn't really follow the usual rule, but set in the language enough to be correct.

  • @randoboomer
    @randoboomer Рік тому

    Crypto mining?

    • @qiskit
      @qiskit  Рік тому

      not really good for that

  • @mayukhpurkayastha2649
    @mayukhpurkayastha2649 Рік тому

    🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏🙏🙏🙏love from India and Bangladesh 😃😄😄😄😄

  • @elialvarez2123
    @elialvarez2123 Рік тому

    🧮

  • @chhewee
    @chhewee Рік тому +5

    Lies

    • @stevechance150
      @stevechance150 Рік тому +2

      Their qubits are noisy. You don't get full use of all the qubits due to interference and they know it.