Monk Peresvet's spear was shorter than that of the Mongol warrior Chelubei. Therefore, Peresvet went to the duel without armor. He knew that Chelubei's spear would pierce through him, but he would be stay able to sit in the saddle and reach his spear to Chelubei accordingly.
@@vladvlad11299 the animation is a mixed bags of beautiful hand drawn movement and poor digital 2d movements of a static drawings which made it look confusing. and I do acknowledge the overuse of static drawings as limitations of hand painted cartoons like these so personally I appreciate it.
7:27 I freaking love the fact that orthodox priests/monks fight if evil is at bay, shall it be in wars or if a crazy evil person is in near a church, they're allowed to physically fight the mfs, unlike Catholic or evangelical Christian priests
In Orthodoxy, it is good to fight for your land, whether you are even a priest, a monk or just an ordinary person. To fight for your homeland is a great feat, whoever you are
I am ethnically Irish and Finnish. But I have so much respect for Russias history and the Orthodox church. I am in the process of joining my local Serbian Orthodox church. I respect how Orthodox Christians will not let "Invaders" desecrate their churches and people unlike 99% of Western Christians who seem to lack any courage to defend their faith. You see "New Europeans" burning down cathedrals all over Europe, yet I don't see that happening to Orthodox Churches. Such a strong and beautiful culture that is like a beacon of hope during these crazy times. God bless.
A major battle between the combined Russian army led by the Moscow Grand Duke Dmitry Donskoy and the army of Temnik beklyarbek of the Golden Horde of Mamai, which took place on September 8, 1380 in the area South of the confluence of the Nepryadva river in the don, on Kulikovo field. The decisive victory of the Russian troops in the battle of Kulikovo was an important step towards the restoration of the unity of Russia and the future overthrow of the Golden Horde yoke, which in the era following the battle of Kulikovo, significantly changed its character towards greater independence of the great Moscow princes.
@TheCondescendingRedditor Where did you read such nonsense? After this battle Mamai was too weak and got absorbed into the golden horde again. But this victory inspired Rus and showed them victory against Mongol armies was possible
@@TheCondescendingRedditorthey literally know the very field where this battle happened at. And its the problem with modern historical fields...I rather believe the people who were there and lived in the era than modern historians with their own biases. Most historians aren't foolish enough to say this battle never happened.
I love Russia ❤❤ Love to holy Russian Country❤️❤️❤️ I am a Zaza Iranian from Germany and I love Russia ❤❤❤❤🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺❤️❤️❤️❤️ Russia is the holy land and holy Government of Indoeuropean people and all the other❤❤❤❤
Vous n'avez pas besoin de comprendre le russe pour comprendre l'épopée de cette bataille. One doesn't need to understand Russian to get the epicness of the this battle. No es necesario comprender ruso para entender la epica de esta batalla.
Wtf the monk Peresvet, though dead, remained in his saddle while the Mongol champion died and fell from his - it was regarded as a good omen by the Russians.
The battle was. But there were no Mongols.In reality, the war was the Christians who seized power, who fought against the metropolis and were Orthodox.Peresvet was on the side of people who decided to divide the country and seize power. This is reality.
”“Do not think that I have come to bring peace upon the earth. I have come to bring not peace but the sword. For I have come to set a man ‘against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law;“ Matthew 10:34-35 NABRE
Part 1 It's Block's poem. The river stretches. Flowing, sad lazy And washes the shore. Above the scanty clay of the yellow cliff In the steppes of sad stack. Oh, my Russia! My wife! Painfully We have a long way to go! Our way is the arrow of the ancient Tatar will Pierced our chests. Our way-steppe, our way-in anguish boundless - In your anguish, Oh, Russia! And even mist-night and foreign - I'm not afraid. Let night. Will comimsa. Light fires The steppe expanse. The Holy banner will flash in the steppe smoke And the Khan's sword.… And the eternal battle! We only dream of peace Through blood and dust… Flies, flies steppe Mare And crumples the grass… And there is no end! Glimpses of a mile, cliffs… Stop it! Go, go frightened clouds, Sunset in blood! Sunset in blood! From the heart the blood flowing! Cry, heart, cry… There is no peace! Prairie Mare Galloping! Part 2 We, Sam-each, over steppe in midnight have become: Not to go back, not to look back. For swans Nepryadva screaming, And again, again they scream… On the way - combustible white stone. There's a Horde across the river. Light banner over our.
The true victory of russians against the mongols was the Battle of Ugra in 1480 , when the Muscovite forces under Prince Ivan lll the Great of Moscow anihilate the Mongol Golden Horde forces under Akhmed Khan with the artillery guns and muskets , bringing the end of Mongol domination in Russia since 1223.
I thought many tatars fought on the Rus side as well since many saw commander Mamai as an usurper of the Golden Horde's throne and there were numerous feuds. Weren't Rus principalities subject of the Golden Horde in that time? I read there was quite a serious opposition among rus and tatars to Mamai both in the West and East wings of the Horde, so was significant political and military supports from the Golden Hordes eastern wing the White Horde and Tamerlan himself who were eager to end the feud by defeating Mamai.
That is correct, Mamai made a lot of people angry, so to speak :) If I recall correctly, Tochtamysh supplied some Horde troops to Rus in this conflict, while other European states went both ways. You had Lithuanians on both sides, while Western Europeans were likely mercs for Mamai's army. Then you had Armenians as well, who were also either mercs or auxiliaries for Mamai, some may have been for Dmitriy as well. It's definitely not as black and white as frequently portrayed in cartoons or told by stories of "christians vs unfaithful". Both sides had both of these ideas represented. The conflict is frequently mistaken and misrepresented as a conflict of faith, but in fact it was more a conflict of politics and interest. Tochtamysh restored the order and tribute payments after Mamai got deposed and assassinated some years after Kulikovo battle. In turn, Timur deposed of Tochtamysh later on when they had their own conflicts going on.
@@AKRex To be honest, this is one of those battles that because Russia needs to placate its Turkic minorities are too often portrayed as *insufficiently* black and white. There are all those conspiracy theories that the Tatar Yoke never happened, too. This is certainly a conflict with an element of liberation and of Muscovy asserting its capabilities, and it had important symbolic significance for Medieval authors. There were numerous rebellions against the Tatars where they were massacred on an ethnic basis (e.g., the Tver rebellion), so it's not some "realpolitik" world where everyone decides to ignore ethnicity and religion. On the other hand, something like WW2 is portrayed as super black-and-white and if you start bringing up RONA, ROA, UPA, Idel-Ural, Lokot Republic, etc. the Russian state gets incredulous. Even the Napoleonic Wars are shown as really black and white, ignoring the fact that the French were freeing Russian serfs and the Russians were engaged in some horrifying atrocities against the French soldiers.
@@Humanophage Well, in some of the cases you mention, there is nothing to solve. 1) The UPA were terrorists and mass murderers, as were the Ustashas in Croatia. This is understood not only by Russia, but also by Poland (the UPA massacred many Poles), Israel (the UPA also massacred Jews) and many others. The UPA itself (including Stepan Bandera) was convicted by the Nuremberg Trial as war criminals. There is no justification here, just as there is no justification for the German Nazis. 2) Napoleonic France aggressively invaded all of Europe, including Russia. There is nothing to solve here, just as there is nothing to solve in the case of World War I and II, when Germany invaded the whole of Europe. On Russian soil, the French were in the position of aggressors and occupiers. The vast majority of Russians did not welcome the French as liberators, but perceived the French as occupiers. It even sometimes happened that Russian soldiers accidentally shot their own commanders (the nobility and most of the Russian elite at that time spoke French and were more of a German spirit than a Russian one). Such was the resistance of the Russians to the French conquerors. Napoleon himself was surprised by the great Russian resistance, in which the majority of the common people took part. That some Russian soldiers have committed crimes against French soldiers? But these were crimes and the failures of individuals, not systematic crimes. In the case of French soldiers, these were crimes of a systematic nature. For the Russian serfs, the Napoleonic campaign was not liberation, although it would have looked so on the outside. Entire units of the Napoleonic army (with Napoleon's consent) looted, destroyed and burned entire villages and committed atrocities against the civilian population (these atrocities were preserved in the memory of the Russian people). In a completely systematic way. The Russian Tsar Alexander I himself ordered his army during the campaign of France to treat the French civilian population well and not as the French soldiers treated the Russian civilian population. Even the French themselves (who already had enough of Napoleonic politics) welcomed the Russians as liberators (as opposed to the Russian civilian population, which for the most part was negative about the Napoleonic conquerors). The French soldiers themselves were generally treated better by the Russians than by Napoleon. The fact that many French soldiers remained in Russia (where they were received with dignity as humans) after their war lived, while their comrades-in-arms in France lived and died in poverty, also shows its point. The very "liberation" of Russian serfs can hardly be considered liberation, because the French peasants themselves were in many cases worse off than the Russian serfs. E.g. the French enlightener Charles-Gilbert Romme, who visited Russia, was forced to state that the "slavery" of Russian peasants is better than the "freedom" of French peasants. This is confirmed by the Russian traveler Fonvizin (a great opponent of slave serfdom in Russia, who can in no way be suspected of painting the Russian environment in pink), who visited France at the end of the 18th century and stated that the fate of the Russian peasant seemed happier to him than the fate of the French farmer. At the time of the development and building of capitalism in Europe, there was no protection for peasants and workers from exploitation by their masters. Formally, they were free, but no protection. And so the position of many peasants and workers in the West was not essentially different from slavery. The same would await Russian peasants in the event of the abolition of serfdom by French conquerors, who, moreover, completely ignored Russian customs and traditions and did not intend to abolish serfdom in the Russian spirit, inherent in the Russian environment. The fact that most Russian peasants did not welcome the French as liberators and took an active part in the anti-Napoleonic resistance also shows its point. Thus, to portray the "liberation" of Russian serfs by Napoleon as a positive aspect and liberation is completely at odds with historical reality. So if something is really not black and white, it is the life of Russian peasants compared to the lives of Western peasants and workers. Not the fact of Napoleonic aggression against Russia and the whole of Europe.
It is very unlikely that the genoese mercenaries ever participated in the conflict, the closest thing to prove the existence of crusader mercenaries in the army of the golden horde during the battle of kulikovo is when the first cavalry charge sent by muscovy faced overwhelming resistance that pushed them back due to advanced western european double rank pike-and-shield formation. It is completely plausible that the genoese taught the mongols european warfare since they had a colony in crimea and the pontus region, however it would be very unlikely for them to accept mercenary work under khanic forces. The only historical acclaim to crusader-mongol forces joining together was in the middle east, where antioch, acre, and damascus all banded up together with the mongols to beat the broken islamic caliphates. I would also say that the depiction of heavily armored genoan/achaean/outremer knights and men-at-arms losing so easily to lightly armored foot soldiers as completely unrealistic especially counting just how much experience they would have in combat in comparison to both sides of the army (muscovy mainly levied peasants all in the matter of two weeks, meaning that although they gained the numbers, it's mostly just peasants that would be mowed down easily by any mercenary, same goes for the golden horde as they were ravaged by civil war and poor leadership due to their corrupt and inefficient leaders).
The genoese crossbowmen didn't take that much part in the battle anyway they did help in the first charge but when the Mongol leader sent his infantry to charge the rus they stayed in the back doing nothing cuz the crossbows aim was blocked , the armor part its true that it's not realistic but still I think compared to most Hollywood or Netflix movies it's way better, the formations are done beautifully and the battle was great + the artstyle is incredible
Original Cuman-Kipchak tribes ran from the Mongols to Hungary and Bulgaria after the battle of Kalka river in 1223. Those who didn't escape got captured,enslaved and enlisted to the Mongol horde. Many decades later they became part of Golden Horde.
Это литовцы, они сражались на стороне монголов (как и некоторые русские княжества). Но литовцы на самом деле присоединились к битве только когда уже объединенные русские войска уходили с поля боя с победой
This battle weakened the Mamai mongols who were independent so they got defeated and absorbed by the golden Horde. They later burned Moscow to reinstablish their power. They did not defeat the Rus though since they had fled before the burning, but it made them continue to send tribute.
@@DeerajGopalkrishna-yb3fs By that time slavic knights was in alliance with turks on frontiers (google black clobucks, it was oguz tribes the ancestors of cossack people, they became orthodox and mix with slavic ppl in XII cent.) and with some horde's knights. Also, in GH there were many nestorian christians (kereits, naimans, some part of guz, chigilis, merkits and kidan ppl). So it was not christians vs muslims (Mamay and most of crimean turks were muslims by that time)/pagans or slavs vs turks. Need to mention that some slavic knights were fighting on Mamay's side. It was a political issue, not national for sure. Religious thing was more obvious point, because Crimean khanate was living by slave trade and robbery, being muslim they brought christians in slavery and sell them in Ottoman empire or Egypt. Sorry for my poor english.
@@pomiklom2499 Are you calling me stupid? Seriously bro? Why are you geting triggered so suddenly? I am not insulting your "precious history cartoon"! Im just say this cartoon has no blood. Are all Slav like this (you)?🤣🤣
@@mackeybossmaikuellien1392 For the stupid I repeat, go see the literary works the tale of Tsar Saltan, the tale of the three heroes, Thumbelina, Pinocchio, Mountain of gems, snow white and the seven dwarves. It's all like the story of the battle of Kulikovo. And me as the don't give a fuck utterly on you. It just shows you're a little dumb.
Украинцы это русские и происходят от русского народа жившего на окраинах России. Украинская мова это результат безграмотности в разговорной речи русского народа ещё при царских временах. Вы и жили на окраинах (от того и Украина) России, в своих сёлах, сама же Украина только в СССР появилась благо Ленин позволил которого вы любите сносить.
Oh well, it's come down to us from ancient Chronicles and why do we have in the literature, many poems and a few stories written about the great victory of the Moscow Principality over the Golden Horde
A major battle between the combined Russian army led by the Moscow Grand Duke Dmitry Donskoy and the army of Temnik beklyarbek of the Golden Horde of Mamai, which took place on September 8, 1380 in the area South of the confluence of the Nepryadva river in the don, on Kulikovo field. The decisive victory of the Russian troops in the battle of Kulikovo was an important step towards the restoration of the unity of Russia and the future overthrow of the Golden Horde yoke, which in the era following the battle of Kulikovo, significantly changed its character towards greater independence of the great Moscow princes.Wikipedia
With your donations I can get more time to create and upload new videos.
paypal.me/YTmustbefunny
Monk Peresvet's spear was shorter than that of the Mongol warrior Chelubei. Therefore, Peresvet went to the duel without armor. He knew that Chelubei's spear would pierce through him, but he would be stay able to sit in the saddle and reach his spear to Chelubei accordingly.
beautiful
Damn that hits hard 🥹
RIP Dmitry Donskoy.
Long live Holy Rus!
Why RIP lul he survived and won that battle.
@@Boyar300AV I think he meant after he died but not the battle
@@Boyar300AV That's true. But he is long dead.
@@arandomdude9982 Precisely.
@@vecnyslovan5676 He was wounded and unconscious by the end of the battle tho right?
С нами Бог ☦️
Миром Господу по молимся, Брат
From an animation stand point, this was well done. Great deal of detail. Love the colors.
it looks good and bad at the same time
i guess its an artistic choice
@@dolsopolarit looks like those historical paintings but moving. i guess that's what they're going for.
@@dolsopolarbesides the flickering i personally don't really find anything bad. I find the movements natural and like the level of detail
@@vladvlad11299 the animation is a mixed bags of beautiful hand drawn movement and poor digital 2d movements of a static drawings which made it look confusing. and I do acknowledge the overuse of static drawings as limitations of hand painted cartoons like these so personally I appreciate it.
@@vladvlad11299 also the front three knights at 4:14 were literally traced on someone's art.
7:27 I freaking love the fact that orthodox priests/monks fight if evil is at bay, shall it be in wars or if a crazy evil person is in near a church, they're allowed to physically fight the mfs, unlike Catholic or evangelical Christian priests
Catholic bishops, monks and priests did fight in crusades
In Orthodoxy, it is good to fight for your land, whether you are even a priest, a monk or just an ordinary person. To fight for your homeland is a great feat, whoever you are
@@allmattkias unbelievable
@@ИванСиднев-л9т but what does jesus say about that type of violence?
@@martinjugolin2087 In fact, it is protecting yourself and your family. Can this be blamed?
I am ethnically Irish and Finnish. But I have so much respect for Russias history and the Orthodox church. I am in the process of joining my local Serbian Orthodox church. I respect how Orthodox Christians will not let "Invaders" desecrate their churches and people unlike 99% of Western Christians who seem to lack any courage to defend their faith. You see "New Europeans" burning down cathedrals all over Europe, yet I don't see that happening to Orthodox Churches. Such a strong and beautiful culture that is like a beacon of hope during these crazy times. God bless.
You sound like a cringey terminaly online larper tbh
@@marcomartins3563nah i agree with him
May God bless your journey and keep you strong in faith. Lord Jesus Christ our God, have mercy on us ☦️
@@marcomartins3563Why are you discouraging him in finding his faith? Who are you to judge him?
@@ratbagfr I'm not a LARPer
Slava Bogu ☦️
A major battle between the combined Russian army led by the Moscow Grand Duke Dmitry Donskoy and the army of Temnik beklyarbek of the Golden Horde of Mamai, which took place on September 8, 1380 in the area South of the confluence of the Nepryadva river in the don, on Kulikovo field. The decisive victory of the Russian troops in the battle of Kulikovo was an important step towards the restoration of the unity of Russia and the future overthrow of the Golden Horde yoke, which in the era following the battle of Kulikovo, significantly changed its character towards greater independence of the great Moscow princes.
I read this battle probably never happened l. Just Russian imperial propaganda
@TheCondescendingRedditor Where did you read such nonsense? After this battle Mamai was too weak and got absorbed into the golden horde again. But this victory inspired Rus and showed them victory against Mongol armies was possible
@@tid06 idk said it’s disputed among historians especially the details of it
@@TheCondescendingRedditorthey literally know the very field where this battle happened at. And its the problem with modern historical fields...I rather believe the people who were there and lived in the era than modern historians with their own biases. Most historians aren't foolish enough to say this battle never happened.
@@adamoneil5317 proof
I love Russia ❤❤ Love to holy Russian Country❤️❤️❤️ I am a Zaza Iranian from Germany and I love Russia ❤❤❤❤🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺❤️❤️❤️❤️ Russia is the holy land and holy Government of Indoeuropean people and all the other❤❤❤❤
МЫ РУССКИЕ!С НАМИ БОГ!!
🤍💙❤️☦️🖤💛🤍
Very nicely done. I thought this was about history but it shows the true brutally nature of war.
May I never see it in my lifetime
"Watch the Danish series (8 parts) "1864" about their second war with the Prussians. Very accurate. Very moving. And awful bloody.
It's that Heavy Metal feel to the animation. Way cool.
Am baffled that this didn't get more views, it is a job well done for sure.
Maybe if you upload it with a higher resolution it will boom.
"Babe you've been playing age of empires all day, what's going on in that noggin of yours?"
My mind:
no blood, yet still more brutal than anything hollywood does
❤🇷🇸❤️🇷🇺💪🙏☦️
Holy shit those animations. So damn well done
My childhood, revisited ❤
Spoiler alert: Jesus wins.
The animation is very well done I am very impressed 👌❤️
In a different life, this could have been from a movie made by Rich Animation Studios, very well done!
Vous n'avez pas besoin de comprendre le russe pour comprendre l'épopée de cette bataille.
One doesn't need to understand Russian to get the epicness of the this battle.
No es necesario comprender ruso para entender la epica de esta batalla.
Wtf the monk Peresvet, though dead, remained in his saddle while the Mongol champion died and fell from his - it was regarded as a good omen by the Russians.
The battle was. But there were no Mongols.In reality, the war was the Christians who seized power, who fought against the metropolis and were Orthodox.Peresvet was on the side of people who decided to divide the country and seize power. This is reality.
@@copcop9588 Pseudo-historical nonsense.
@@copcop9588begone
”“Do not think that I have come to bring peace upon the earth. I have come to bring not peace but the sword. For I have come to set a man ‘against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law;“
Matthew 10:34-35 NABRE
Part 1 It's Block's poem.
The river stretches. Flowing, sad lazy
And washes the shore.
Above the scanty clay of the yellow cliff
In the steppes of sad stack.
Oh, my Russia! My wife! Painfully
We have a long way to go!
Our way is the arrow of the ancient Tatar will
Pierced our chests.
Our way-steppe, our way-in anguish boundless -
In your anguish, Oh, Russia!
And even mist-night and foreign -
I'm not afraid.
Let night. Will comimsa. Light fires
The steppe expanse.
The Holy banner will flash in the steppe smoke
And the Khan's sword.…
And the eternal battle! We only dream of peace
Through blood and dust…
Flies, flies steppe Mare
And crumples the grass…
And there is no end! Glimpses of a mile, cliffs…
Stop it!
Go, go frightened clouds,
Sunset in blood!
Sunset in blood! From the heart the blood flowing!
Cry, heart, cry…
There is no peace! Prairie Mare
Galloping!
Part 2
We, Sam-each, over steppe in midnight have become:
Not to go back, not to look back.
For swans Nepryadva screaming,
And again, again they scream…
On the way - combustible white stone.
There's a Horde across the river.
Light banner over our.
Awesome animation.
No auto generated subtitles. English subtitles would be great. Thanks.
Alexander Peresvet 🙏🙏🙏
So beautiful .
Hope there be a translation to arabic or english
"добрые" европейцы уже тогда приходили насаждать свои ценности с помощью оружия, приглядитесь 1:27 4:16
What a shame for them,ally with the turco-mongol and fights their Christian russian brother,what a shame for europe
@@FBonyits just propaganda, it was other russian orthodox principalities who fought against donskoy. And i am not even against russia, but its obvius
Ура!!!!!!!
The true victory of russians against the mongols was the Battle of Ugra in 1480 , when the Muscovite forces under Prince Ivan lll the Great of Moscow anihilate the Mongol Golden Horde forces under Akhmed Khan with the artillery guns and muskets , bringing the end of Mongol domination in Russia since 1223.
This battle very important in rus history
I thought many tatars fought on the Rus side as well since many saw commander Mamai as an usurper of the Golden Horde's throne and there were numerous feuds. Weren't Rus principalities subject of the Golden Horde in that time? I read there was quite a serious opposition among rus and tatars to Mamai both in the West and East wings of the Horde, so was significant political and military supports from the Golden Hordes eastern wing the White Horde and Tamerlan himself who were eager to end the feud by defeating Mamai.
That is correct, Mamai made a lot of people angry, so to speak :) If I recall correctly, Tochtamysh supplied some Horde troops to Rus in this conflict, while other European states went both ways. You had Lithuanians on both sides, while Western Europeans were likely mercs for Mamai's army. Then you had Armenians as well, who were also either mercs or auxiliaries for Mamai, some may have been for Dmitriy as well. It's definitely not as black and white as frequently portrayed in cartoons or told by stories of "christians vs unfaithful". Both sides had both of these ideas represented. The conflict is frequently mistaken and misrepresented as a conflict of faith, but in fact it was more a conflict of politics and interest. Tochtamysh restored the order and tribute payments after Mamai got deposed and assassinated some years after Kulikovo battle. In turn, Timur deposed of Tochtamysh later on when they had their own conflicts going on.
@@AKRex To be honest, this is one of those battles that because Russia needs to placate its Turkic minorities are too often portrayed as *insufficiently* black and white. There are all those conspiracy theories that the Tatar Yoke never happened, too. This is certainly a conflict with an element of liberation and of Muscovy asserting its capabilities, and it had important symbolic significance for Medieval authors. There were numerous rebellions against the Tatars where they were massacred on an ethnic basis (e.g., the Tver rebellion), so it's not some "realpolitik" world where everyone decides to ignore ethnicity and religion.
On the other hand, something like WW2 is portrayed as super black-and-white and if you start bringing up RONA, ROA, UPA, Idel-Ural, Lokot Republic, etc. the Russian state gets incredulous. Even the Napoleonic Wars are shown as really black and white, ignoring the fact that the French were freeing Russian serfs and the Russians were engaged in some horrifying atrocities against the French soldiers.
@@Humanophage Well, in some of the cases you mention, there is nothing to solve.
1) The UPA were terrorists and mass murderers, as were the Ustashas in Croatia. This is understood not only by Russia, but also by Poland (the UPA massacred many Poles), Israel (the UPA also massacred Jews) and many others. The UPA itself (including Stepan Bandera) was convicted by the Nuremberg Trial as war criminals.
There is no justification here, just as there is no justification for the German Nazis.
2) Napoleonic France aggressively invaded all of Europe, including Russia. There is nothing to solve here, just as there is nothing to solve in the case of World War I and II, when Germany invaded the whole of Europe. On Russian soil, the French were in the position of aggressors and occupiers. The vast majority of Russians did not welcome the French as liberators, but perceived the French as occupiers. It even sometimes happened that Russian soldiers accidentally shot their own commanders (the nobility and most of the Russian elite at that time spoke French and were more of a German spirit than a Russian one). Such was the resistance of the Russians to the French conquerors. Napoleon himself was surprised by the great Russian resistance, in which the majority of the common people took part.
That some Russian soldiers have committed crimes against French soldiers? But these were crimes and the failures of individuals, not systematic crimes. In the case of French soldiers, these were crimes of a systematic nature.
For the Russian serfs, the Napoleonic campaign was not liberation, although it would have looked so on the outside. Entire units of the Napoleonic army (with Napoleon's consent) looted, destroyed and burned entire villages and committed atrocities against the civilian population (these atrocities were preserved in the memory of the Russian people). In a completely systematic way.
The Russian Tsar Alexander I himself ordered his army during the campaign of France to treat the French civilian population well and not as the French soldiers treated the Russian civilian population. Even the French themselves (who already had enough of Napoleonic politics) welcomed the Russians as liberators (as opposed to the Russian civilian population, which for the most part was negative about the Napoleonic conquerors).
The French soldiers themselves were generally treated better by the Russians than by Napoleon.
The fact that many French soldiers remained in Russia (where they were received with dignity as humans) after their war lived, while their comrades-in-arms in France lived and died in poverty, also shows its point.
The very "liberation" of Russian serfs can hardly be considered liberation, because the French peasants themselves were in many cases worse off than the Russian serfs.
E.g. the French enlightener Charles-Gilbert Romme, who visited Russia, was forced to state that the "slavery" of Russian peasants is better than the "freedom" of French peasants.
This is confirmed by the Russian traveler Fonvizin (a great opponent of slave serfdom in Russia, who can in no way be suspected of painting the Russian environment in pink), who visited France at the end of the 18th century and stated that the fate of the Russian peasant seemed happier to him than the fate of the French farmer.
At the time of the development and building of capitalism in Europe, there was no protection for peasants and workers from exploitation by their masters. Formally, they were free, but no protection. And so the position of many peasants and workers in the West was not essentially different from slavery.
The same would await Russian peasants in the event of the abolition of serfdom by French conquerors, who, moreover, completely ignored Russian customs and traditions and did not intend to abolish serfdom in the Russian spirit, inherent in the Russian environment. The fact that most Russian peasants did not welcome the French as liberators and took an active part in the anti-Napoleonic resistance also shows its point.
Thus, to portray the "liberation" of Russian serfs by Napoleon as a positive aspect and liberation is completely at odds with historical reality.
So if something is really not black and white, it is the life of Russian peasants compared to the lives of Western peasants and workers. Not the fact of Napoleonic aggression against Russia and the whole of Europe.
Que buen video
я не пойму, кто все эти люди, кто оставляют каменты? англоязычные что, интересуются нашей историей? Если да, то прикольно.
Ever heard of UA-cam recommendations? And there is no such thing as purely your history.
@@davidganta462 oh...)))
If its not a secret, where are you from?
@@demid5518 Originally? Balkan.
@@davidganta462 its cool from Bulgaria or Serbia?
@@demid5518 Romania.
"then Tamerlane came to support Toktamysh"!!!!
Horror story' just begin for east europe
Fool Toktamysh attacked Tamerlane. This helped to Russia to weak Mongolian forces and survive.
Perfection
I Saw Westernern Europeans in the Animation. Are thy allied with the Rus or the Golden Horde?
with the Golden Hord
Some western mercenaries fought for Mongols, some, mostly Lithuanian exiles, fought on the Russian side.
Genoese mercenaries hired by mongols
Who were the knight's that fought with the golden horde?
Italian Mercenaries, they where Heavy Infantry
Battle of Kashmiriad (19-30 October 349) Tisar Empire vs. Namotonic Kingdom
Awesome animation just with there was subtitles so I new what is going on lol.
Кстати недавно нашли место битвы
Your intro taking forever
i wish it had english subitlrs
It is very unlikely that the genoese mercenaries ever participated in the conflict, the closest thing to prove the existence of crusader mercenaries in the army of the golden horde during the battle of kulikovo is when the first cavalry charge sent by muscovy faced overwhelming resistance that pushed them back due to advanced western european double rank pike-and-shield formation. It is completely plausible that the genoese taught the mongols european warfare since they had a colony in crimea and the pontus region, however it would be very unlikely for them to accept mercenary work under khanic forces. The only historical acclaim to crusader-mongol forces joining together was in the middle east, where antioch, acre, and damascus all banded up together with the mongols to beat the broken islamic caliphates.
I would also say that the depiction of heavily armored genoan/achaean/outremer knights and men-at-arms losing so easily to lightly armored foot soldiers as completely unrealistic especially counting just how much experience they would have in combat in comparison to both sides of the army (muscovy mainly levied peasants all in the matter of two weeks, meaning that although they gained the numbers, it's mostly just peasants that would be mowed down easily by any mercenary, same goes for the golden horde as they were ravaged by civil war and poor leadership due to their corrupt and inefficient leaders).
The genoese crossbowmen didn't take that much part in the battle anyway they did help in the first charge but when the Mongol leader sent his infantry to charge the rus they stayed in the back doing nothing cuz the crossbows aim was blocked , the armor part its true that it's not realistic but still I think compared to most Hollywood or Netflix movies it's way better, the formations are done beautifully and the battle was great + the artstyle is incredible
Why are there a few clips of European knights marching?
Probably Western European mercenaries
Do you know what happened at kalka river
знаем. киевские князья проиграли монголам. а на Куликовом поле московские победили.
Name song final video
Vietnam ❤ Russia
The ideogram '劉' stands for the royal family of Huns in 3~4th century China...having almost nothing to do with the Golden Horde...
European knights fighting for the mongols?💀
Yeah...
Those were Genoese.
Mercenaries
Genoese and Italians
Care for money first
Religion 2nd
lithuanians
3:12
But I don't get it, why there's European troops?
Tatars only had cavalry. so they used Genoese crossbowmen and infantry from Crimea.
Наёмники из Европы участвовали во многих битвах кто давал деньги за того и воевали
Я не могу понять
Почему на стороне Золотой орды воюют европейцы?
В крыму были Генуэзские колонии, у Генуэзцев были отличные арбалетчики и пехота, вот их то и подтянул Мамай, так как у Татар была только конница.
наемники. А наемникам пофиг за кого воевать, лишь бы платили.
Why do they throw their spears?
kinda like horse jousting
OOGA BOOGA
GIB RUSSIA
Go home and drink horse milk.
Kipchak Empire
Original Cuman-Kipchak tribes ran from the Mongols to Hungary and Bulgaria after the battle of Kalka river in 1223. Those who didn't escape got captured,enslaved and enlisted to the Mongol horde. Many decades later they became part of Golden Horde.
And after 2 years tatars burned down to Moscow. (Toktamis 1382)
1.27 brave tatar warrior name ???
Chelubei
Wow
Wait...what about those europoean knights? Which side they fought for?
Это литовцы, они сражались на стороне монголов (как и некоторые русские княжества). Но литовцы на самом деле присоединились к битве только когда уже объединенные русские войска уходили с поля боя с победой
@@Killo-dp9jn Спасибо!
Wait who were the knights??? And why did they ally with the mongols?
Russians
So it was Russians and Mongolian vs Russians?
Russians against Mongols and European mercenaries
Russain againts Golden Horde Dum Dum not mongol
It was Muscovy vs. Golden Horde and genoses mercenaries
Слава России
No horse archer
In the second year of this battle finished , Mongol reconquer Russian territory and burned Moscow city.
Not conquer moscovia yes kiev etc principates kulikovo win russian
Tokthamysh
This battle weakened the Mamai mongols who were independent so they got defeated and absorbed by the golden Horde. They later burned Moscow to reinstablish their power. They did not defeat the Rus though since they had fled before the burning, but it made them continue to send tribute.
🙏🏻🇭🇷✝️
4:44
I didn’t knew that the mongols have European troops 1:27
According to one version, there were mercenaries from Genoa in Mamai 's army
Ok ty
GLORY TO JESUS CHRIST!✝️☦️☝️
Why post with an English video title, when the speaking is not in English, nor are there even English subtitles??? It's ridiculous. 👎
We like jesus but I hate starving. Help from doctor nowhere
Ну и мазня же…
za bolio tana orsuudcn mori unj chaddgu bsn gj tuuhendr bicgdsn bjl bnle morin dr ingj harvdg edr gj yrihin bol mnahshu unnde
Les empire de jesus christ nous
Turks vs Slavs be like
Mongol-Tatars
@@zlatni_oraotatars are also turks
It's waaaaay not so black and white :)
@@cornplastics what are you trying to say maan
@@DeerajGopalkrishna-yb3fs By that time slavic knights was in alliance with turks on frontiers (google black clobucks, it was oguz tribes the ancestors of cossack people, they became orthodox and mix with slavic ppl in XII cent.) and with some horde's knights. Also, in GH there were many nestorian christians (kereits, naimans, some part of guz, chigilis, merkits and kidan ppl). So it was not christians vs muslims (Mamay and most of crimean turks were muslims by that time)/pagans or slavs vs turks. Need to mention that some slavic knights were fighting on Mamay's side. It was a political issue, not national for sure. Religious thing was more obvious point, because Crimean khanate was living by slave trade and robbery, being muslim they brought christians in slavery and sell them in Ottoman empire or Egypt. Sorry for my poor english.
A bruh
Lol no blood.😂😂
Lol well, I looked at how the BOJ would you look at the carnage where chenaut people.
@@pomiklom2499 What do you mean?😂😂
@@mackeybossmaikuellien1392 For the stupid, in Russian history and literature took such cartoons.
@@pomiklom2499 Are you calling me stupid? Seriously bro? Why are you geting triggered so suddenly? I am not insulting your "precious history cartoon"! Im just say this cartoon has no blood. Are all Slav like this (you)?🤣🤣
@@mackeybossmaikuellien1392 For the stupid I repeat, go see the literary works the tale of Tsar Saltan, the tale of the three heroes, Thumbelina, Pinocchio, Mountain of gems, snow white and the seven dwarves. It's all like the story of the battle of Kulikovo. And me as the don't give a fuck utterly on you. It just shows you're a little dumb.
Ruusss funyy
lmao, is this some russian propaganda or something lolll
I actually found out it’s a religious cartoon
Real historical
before you say anything, educate yourself.
Why not have blood?? This is bad russian animation
It's almost 90s movie
Shut the hell up
Это церковный мультфильм понятно
Lol where is the battle of Kalka? Huh 🫢😂
Где теперь монголы?)
@@lorgar_ where are the Russians now ? What is the Russia 🤢☠️
lol the evil laugh of mongols here... mongols r some of the nicest ppl in the world wtf rofl
It’s not modern
yea... these "nicest people in the world" destroyed nearly every town and city they conquered and killed everyone inside them...
@@skraskraa._.5371 I said today you dotard LOL
Mongols are good
But Khans were wild
Go read history
Russian? You mean Kievan Rus? Moscow submitted while Kyiv fought to the end
Не показывай свою глупость в угоду политической повестке
Украинцы это русские и происходят от русского народа жившего на окраинах России. Украинская мова это результат безграмотности в разговорной речи русского народа ещё при царских временах. Вы и жили на окраинах (от того и Украина) России, в своих сёлах, сама же Украина только в СССР появилась благо Ленин позволил которого вы любите сносить.
Ни с кем украинцы не боролись, они были сразу же захваченны ордой, а затем и Литвой. С монголами сражалась Москва
So funny. Russian fake history lol
Oh well, it's come down to us from ancient Chronicles and why do we have in the literature, many poems and a few stories written about the great victory of the Moscow Principality over the Golden Horde
A major battle between the combined Russian army led by the Moscow Grand Duke Dmitry Donskoy and the army of Temnik beklyarbek of the Golden Horde of Mamai, which took place on September 8, 1380 in the area South of the confluence of the Nepryadva river in the don, on Kulikovo field. The decisive victory of the Russian troops in the battle of Kulikovo was an important step towards the restoration of the unity of Russia and the future overthrow of the Golden Horde yoke, which in the era following the battle of Kulikovo, significantly changed its character towards greater independence of the great Moscow princes.Wikipedia
Kulikovo battle is fake history? Are you moron ? 😂😂😂😂😂 hello to parallel universe 😂
Its a lie hha Mongolians winner this battle
The battle of kulikovo defeated the golden horde under the grand prince of moscow, Dmitry go research before you keep denying
Are you completely stupid? An alternative story?
😂this movie lost history mongols never lose Russia 😂
Idiot, educate yourself
fake
educate yourself
Fake is you
Fake video kipchaks win im kipchak
Russian cavalry cut through your kipchaks like knife on butter
idiot-russoffob detected
Look at Wikipedia TURK
Fake anime!!!
Заткнись
Это наша история России
Балбес.
this is real do your own research dummy
Bruh :v
хлебало закрой. ЭТо российская история. Сам-то откуда, есть чем в своей истории похвастать или только чужую обсирать ума хватает, придурок?
Слава России!