HLG3 VS HLG2

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
  • Sony A7RIV, Both captures are same ISO,Aperture and shutter speed.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9

  • @armando.visuals
    @armando.visuals 3 роки тому +5

    Cool, helped me confirm once more to choose HLG2 over 3 as my low light pro file

    • @nickmooreHDR
      @nickmooreHDR 2 роки тому

      I shoot all of my videos here in HLG2, are there certain circumstances where HLG3 is better?

    • @armando.visuals
      @armando.visuals 2 роки тому

      @@nickmooreHDR yes, you get more dynamic range in the shadows. Lots of big creators choose HLG3 for that reason and colors. You can watch Gerald Undone video. I’ve found HLG3 to be a bit cleaner. I used to love HLG2 but i switched to 3 after seeing the review from Gerald and being lucky to talk so some big creators.

    • @armando.visuals
      @armando.visuals 2 роки тому +1

      @@nickmooreHDR also when i saw this video first and commented back then i was as you can see searching for which one. Your video was very helpful by the way :)

  • @wedworkflow
    @wedworkflow Рік тому +2

    HLG2 and HLG3 has different base ISO. That's why you get some noise at the same ISO.

  • @ASX2001
    @ASX2001 2 роки тому

    Thank You, very helpful! 👍

  • @RosmeryGongoraWeddingFilmmaker
    @RosmeryGongoraWeddingFilmmaker 4 місяці тому

    Yo siempre he usado HLG2, pero tienes que subexponer porque las luces alta se queman y no se pudden recuuperar.

  • @itsdannyftw
    @itsdannyftw 3 роки тому +4

    HLG2 is better? Less noise? Which do you use now?

    • @armando.visuals
      @armando.visuals 3 роки тому +2

      HLG2 is better with less noise. And also better for low light