Eh you should not put carbon fiber in your ams (those gears are not hardend) get a drying box next to it and use a PTFE splitter so the Bambu pulls it out of there
Drybox is better indeed but AMS can perfectly handle carbon fiber filaments. Before we had a drybox at work, we printed 24/7 PAHT-CF parts with the filament in de AMS without ever needing to replace a feeder and we still do it 😉
@@Creative_3DPrinting The ams can print it yes but it very bad for your ams. I have worked with the Bambu printers since the day the x1 released. The only supported carbon fiber Filament is Bambu carbon fiber Filament and not even all it I remember correctly. The reason some are okay is because of the extremely low amount of carbon fiber. Also 99% of carbon fiber filaments are weaker than pla due to how carbon fiber functions you would need a very specific part and settings. Even then you need continuous carbon fiber Filament which is quite expensive otherwise it won't make the part stronger.
Eh you should not put carbon fiber in your ams (those gears are not hardend) get a drying box next to it and use a PTFE splitter so the Bambu pulls it out of there
Drybox is better indeed but AMS can perfectly handle carbon fiber filaments. Before we had a drybox at work, we printed 24/7 PAHT-CF parts with the filament in de AMS without ever needing to replace a feeder and we still do it 😉
@@Creative_3DPrinting The ams can print it yes but it very bad for your ams. I have worked with the Bambu printers since the day the x1 released. The only supported carbon fiber Filament is Bambu carbon fiber Filament and not even all it I remember correctly. The reason some are okay is because of the extremely low amount of carbon fiber. Also 99% of carbon fiber filaments are weaker than pla due to how carbon fiber functions you would need a very specific part and settings. Even then you need continuous carbon fiber Filament which is quite expensive otherwise it won't make the part stronger.
@@sebastian_olthuis The filament I use is compatible for the AMS (it was on the website) but as you said, it's better to use a drybox.
@@Creative_3DPrinting yes it can handle it. But it will require you replacing parts due to carbon fiber, being very abrasive.