Airplane Collison Involving 3 Planes (Guangzhou Airport Collision) - DISASTER BREAKDOWN

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 192

  • @bindedvision404
    @bindedvision404 2 роки тому +353

    The recorded collision of the two planes was very disturbing. Imagine you are waiting in the airport but suddenly you hear a bangs and explosion of the two planes

    • @behindthen0thing
      @behindthen0thing 2 роки тому

      He as r a bangs

    • @nathanw9770
      @nathanw9770 2 роки тому +2

      Hmmmm I guess I don't fancy a vacation anymore....

    • @mike04574
      @mike04574 2 роки тому +1

      how did they manage to tpae this

    • @ajeltheflightsimmer
      @ajeltheflightsimmer Рік тому +1

      As a flight sim pilot who reflects on real life things, all airport operations would be halted in order to let emergency services go through.

  • @farhanatashiga3721
    @farhanatashiga3721 2 роки тому +85

    It's frankly astonishing that anyone aboard the 737 survive at all considering the violence of the second impact and subsequent disintegration as it travels further down

  • @n00blol
    @n00blol 2 роки тому +167

    This person handles these situations with care and respect.

  • @nyxqueenofshadows
    @nyxqueenofshadows 2 роки тому +200

    can't imagine what it must have been like for the survivors to live through not one but two plane crashes, minutes apart. like, you think your world is ending, and then it's actually okay, and then *it happens again*. great video, as always!

    • @Aikisbest
      @Aikisbest 2 роки тому +7

      I have been in similar situations (mentally speaking >_

    • @YHDiamond
      @YHDiamond 2 роки тому +9

      Not to lessen it or anything but the first crash only severely damaged the 707, not the 737 which would only explode in the next collision

  • @littlefishiesinthese
    @littlefishiesinthese 2 роки тому +81

    Wow, I’ve never heard of this disaster before, crazy considering how significant it was! Thank you for covering it

    • @1mol831
      @1mol831 2 роки тому

      It was long ago I think

  • @DrrZed
    @DrrZed Рік тому +52

    I remember hearing a story about a guy hijacking a plane and demanding the pilots to take him to Israel. "Okay," said the captain and took him to Israel, where upon the hijacker disembarking the Israeli police force greeted him explained in a very impolite manner that apparently plane hijacking is an act of terrorism, and Israeli do not like terrorists, like, a lot, and he'd have to spend the rest of his life behind bars.

    • @streettrialsandstuff
      @streettrialsandstuff Рік тому +1

      Hijackers are so fucking dumb. Like, who the hell would give an asylum to a criminal anyway.

    • @irbovch
      @irbovch 11 місяців тому +5

      Ironic

  • @DisasterBreakdown
    @DisasterBreakdown  2 роки тому +108

    I know this video was a bit shorter, there is going to be a longer video coming this Tuesday!
    But if you did find this video to be interesting, be sure to subscribe as there is a new video every Saturday. This video also went out to my Patrons on Patreon 48 hours before going out publicly. Consider joining here from £1 per month: www.patreon.com/DisasterBreakdown

    • @shantanusapru
      @shantanusapru 2 роки тому +1

      So how this a "collision involving 3 (THREE) planes"?!??

    • @mozvidz
      @mozvidz 2 роки тому +6

      @@shantanusapru The hijacked plane hit the first plane with the wing and only the pilot was on board. The second one and the hijacked one both with passangers eventually collided and exploded. Totalling to three aircraft involved.

    • @shantanusapru
      @shantanusapru 2 роки тому +1

      @@mozvidz Ah! Got it! Thanks! Guess I wasn't paying much attention... ;-)

    • @GiBBO5700
      @GiBBO5700 2 роки тому +1

      Great video mate! I actually can't wait for the train video

    • @birgenair301
      @birgenair301 2 роки тому +2

      Video idea-1998 ariana afghan boeing 727 crash

  • @justinlynch3
    @justinlynch3 2 роки тому +95

    You make great content. There are lots of rail disasters to cover as well as ship disasters. While I don't think I'd ever get tired of your plane videos, I fully support expanding into other content

  • @hewhohasnoidentity4377
    @hewhohasnoidentity4377 2 роки тому +17

    This is my first time hearing of this incident. Thank you for sharing the story. I don't think many people realize just how common highjackings used to be around the world. There are so many events that it is hard to pick which stores to share.
    In the US highjackings were so frequent that passengers boarded flights wondering if they would divert to Havana.

  • @b.t.356
    @b.t.356 2 роки тому +23

    The video of the 737 and 757 colliding scared me to my core. I can only imagine how the occupants of the planes and the people at the airport were feeling at that moment.

  • @ttheone3518
    @ttheone3518 2 роки тому +85

    I've been waiting for someone to do this for a while, such a fascinating incident and the only one to date where this has happened

    • @Round_Slinger
      @Round_Slinger 2 роки тому

      Fascinating is definitely the wrong word, unless you are sick in the head.

    • @nicholashunt9522
      @nicholashunt9522 2 роки тому +9

      @@Round_Slinger why?? It's not meant in the terms of perverted fascination. It's a fascinating story.

    • @bradsanders407
      @bradsanders407 2 роки тому +5

      @@Round_Slinger so saying this is extremely interesting is "sick in the head"? Why did you watch it? Why are you in the comments if you yourself don't find it interesting?

    • @farhanatashiga3721
      @farhanatashiga3721 2 роки тому +5

      @@Round_Slinger the tragic nature of the event should not detract from the unusual aspects of it in regards to aviation disaster history which can be seen as fascinating to an observer
      You frankly have to be not right in the head to not understand this

    • @jackieronaldwayerston6723
      @jackieronaldwayerston6723 2 роки тому

      I have been waiting this incident to be covered too ever since I found out about it, dear OP.

  • @clarsach29
    @clarsach29 2 роки тому +63

    Interesting case and not one I had heard of before, thank you for covering this in such detail....China saw a spate of fatal air crashes in the 90s and I suspect that both flight procedure AND airport procedures were struggling to cope with the sudden mass expansion in Chinese air travel as people started to earn better wages and wanted to become tourists

    • @AaronShenghao
      @AaronShenghao Рік тому +2

      I don’t consider it really was “a spate”, it was rather about average of the time.
      Like you can’t really blame the Chinese for the Korean Air Cargo crashing their plane, because the captain got confused on what altitude they were cleared for and pitching the plane down into a un-recoverable attitude.
      And at the same time US also had incidents like Colgan Air… etc…
      The only recent crash in China is a suspected pilot murder-suicide, so they seems to be pretty well on the safety front.😊

    • @clarsach29
      @clarsach29 Рік тому +1

      @@AaronShenghao you're right, those are fair points....I think (hope) that aviation is safer in the 2020s now because of some of those accidents and the lessons learned?

  • @flyyhighhr
    @flyyhighhr 2 роки тому +20

    Good work Chloe! Favorite part of every Saturday tbh

  • @uzaiyaro
    @uzaiyaro 2 роки тому +48

    There are three of those squawk codes, out of interest. 7500: hijacking 7600: radio/comms fault, 7700: general emergency. Here’s how I remember them:
    75: man with a knife
    76: I need my radio fixed
    77: I’m falling from heaven
    Also, in the case of complete comms failure, there are ATC measures in place for this, such as waving them in, or I guess one could also have a military intercept to guide them in.

    • @Musikur
      @Musikur 2 роки тому +7

      75 Taken alive?

    • @Ryuuu6581
      @Ryuuu6581 Рік тому +2

      7500: fortnite kid hijack attempt
      7600: FM radio broken
      7700: someone shat on the floor

    • @TonyEmond
      @TonyEmond 6 місяців тому +3

      "Squawk 7700 to get priority service! and an extensive welcoming party."

  • @ATIMELINEOFAVIATION
    @ATIMELINEOFAVIATION 2 роки тому +19

    I was actually born in Guangzhou and my dad worked at China Southern, so thanks for making this video!

    • @beenaplumber8379
      @beenaplumber8379 10 місяців тому +1

      Did you ever hear a reason given for firing airport staff? What were they expected to do differently with a plane that was under the control of a hijacker and never even stopped? That baffles me. I'm very interested in their reasoning. Thanks!

    • @ATIMELINEOFAVIATION
      @ATIMELINEOFAVIATION 10 місяців тому +1

      @@beenaplumber8379 idk lol that was a loooooong time ago

    • @beenaplumber8379
      @beenaplumber8379 10 місяців тому +1

      @@ATIMELINEOFAVIATION Ok, thanks for the reply. I suspect they needed someone to blame, but I don't know.

  • @gooner72
    @gooner72 11 місяців тому

    Chloe, I must say that you do these videos really well. Not only are they well researched, well animated, well scripted and well narrated but they are done in an unusually sympathetic and respectful manner that most other channels like this don't.
    FANTASTIC JOB CHLOE!!!!

  • @Squidgit2000
    @Squidgit2000 10 місяців тому +2

    The copilot on the Xiamen Air 373 was a man named YingZhao. My family lived in the apartment across from his in 1989 & 1990. I'm not sure why so little is publicly known about the rest of the crew on board :(

  • @killham1337
    @killham1337 2 роки тому +8

    Greetings from Xiamen, I had never heard of this one. Great video

  • @Purpleguy1929
    @Purpleguy1929 2 роки тому +11

    Thank you for making this video

  • @alex_zetsu
    @alex_zetsu 2 роки тому +19

    I know a three plane collision is physically possible, but I didn't think it would be something that would happen in a millennium

    • @iLLBiLLsRoastBeats
      @iLLBiLLsRoastBeats 2 роки тому +1

      It’s 2 separate collisions

    • @vlad34791
      @vlad34791 2 роки тому +5

      Rammstein air show collision was a 3 plane collision too.

  • @xtremenortherner
    @xtremenortherner 2 роки тому +6

    What a waste of life & resources...,RIP those who lost their lives...,condolences to the survivors.

  • @Stichting_NoFa-p
    @Stichting_NoFa-p 2 роки тому +4

    Weird that this is the only really popular video about this crash, usually such serious disasters have more than one video with this amount of views.

  • @josephconnor2310
    @josephconnor2310 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for posting this. I had never heard of it before.

  • @johnfisher7143
    @johnfisher7143 Рік тому +2

    That’s pretty much what you’d call the worst case scenario. If you had to plan for something like this you probably wouldn’t have been this pessimistic about what might happen. Just devastating.

  • @signalwalid25trainz50
    @signalwalid25trainz50 2 роки тому +5

    This was also the first major accident to involve a boeing 757

  • @chowroger4937
    @chowroger4937 2 роки тому +5

    Thanks for making the video. As a citizen and an aviation fan living in Guangzhou, I've read so many local reports and wiki stories but for the first time I'm able to see the raw video footage of the collision, truly scary. Back in 1980s when mainland China opened the gate and fixed the relationship with ROC, a couple of hijack incidents happened.

  • @addzz07
    @addzz07 2 роки тому +6

    keep the good work up!

  • @ijnfuso3368
    @ijnfuso3368 2 роки тому +7

    Never expected Disaster Breakdown would cover this accident.
    also first comment

  • @marcusreins6679
    @marcusreins6679 2 роки тому +1

    I look forward to these videos every Saturday!

  • @CocoTaveras8975
    @CocoTaveras8975 2 роки тому +38

    With previous serious incidents like this dealing with flight deck intrusions, why on earth wasn’t cockpit security, procedures and access made much more stringent and rigid prior to 9/11? It just defies belief!

    • @sparthyslaysstuff2405
      @sparthyslaysstuff2405 2 роки тому +16

      All regulations are written in blood. In this case we just didn't have enough blood (apparently) to have reinforced doors across all aircraft.

    • @markevans2294
      @markevans2294 2 роки тому

      Did the Chinese authorities conduct an ICAO annex 13 investigation, involving Boeing and the NTSB? Or was this more of a criminal investigation without the details being known outside of China at the time.

    • @sarahalbers5555
      @sarahalbers5555 2 роки тому +5

      On US carriers, our system was either a cockpit key, a prearranged knock,or a call on the interphone. I don't think the door was ever actually unlocked. Alot easier to breach, tho. Also , the B737-300 was a United Airlines interior. That series was sometimes referred to as the "Killer Bee". Thanks for this, Chloe. Great job, as usual.

    • @abebuckingham8198
      @abebuckingham8198 2 роки тому +27

      Before then most hijackings ended peacefully as long as you complied with their demands. That changed with 9/11 as compliance led to the weaponization of the plane itself.

    • @bobby1970
      @bobby1970 2 роки тому

      No, only after 911 did they beef up doors and actually keep them locked.

  • @timestampterrysassistant7638
    @timestampterrysassistant7638 2 роки тому +4

    This video was really good

  • @scoobydo446
    @scoobydo446 2 роки тому +2

    Cool, are you early ? It’s midnight here in Australia but I still think you put it out early I’m excited, just message while the adds playing

  • @CathyKitson
    @CathyKitson 5 місяців тому +1

    I always find it surprising how many of these disasters take place on the ground. Liniate, Tenerife, runway excursions, etc.

  • @oliver_6939
    @oliver_6939 2 роки тому +1

    Yesss! Yet another vid! I was waiting:)

  • @crashtestrc4446
    @crashtestrc4446 2 роки тому +1

    Was waiting for ur video from morning ...

  • @blerst7066
    @blerst7066 2 роки тому +7

    "Prepare for trouble..."
    "...and make it triple."

  • @Hunter_Dawso
    @Hunter_Dawso 2 роки тому +6

    If I remember correctly, this incident ended up being the first recorded hull loss of a 757.

  • @kommandantgalileo
    @kommandantgalileo 2 роки тому +12

    The hijacker is stupid for not choosing to go to Hong Kong.

    • @sparthyslaysstuff2405
      @sparthyslaysstuff2405 2 роки тому +9

      Hijack seemed to not be playing with a full deck if you know what I mean.

    • @dontspikemydrink9382
      @dontspikemydrink9382 2 роки тому +2

      @@sparthyslaysstuff2405 he left his aces in the wrong trousers

    • @DaWrecka
      @DaWrecka 6 місяців тому +1

      @@dontspikemydrink9382 And his kings, queens, jacks, 10s...

  • @timjolly9998
    @timjolly9998 10 місяців тому

    My first time hearing about this also. Thanks

  • @Happymali10
    @Happymali10 2 роки тому +29

    I assume the pilot would've been in serious trouble from above if he had given in to the hijacker. Not only for obeying and flying out of the country, but also for flying to a place as controversial as Taiwan.

    • @abebuckingham8198
      @abebuckingham8198 2 роки тому +21

      I think Taiwan shooting down the plane would be a serious possibility as well. This was an exceptionally tense moment in relations between the two.

    • @dynasty0019
      @dynasty0019 2 роки тому +17

      There were a series of hijackings in China during the 90's where the planes landed in Taiwan without incident. This incident was the only exception to that.

    • @asdf3568
      @asdf3568 2 роки тому +4

      Yeah running out of fuel is serious trouble

  • @nativeafroeurasian
    @nativeafroeurasian 2 роки тому +1

    4:41 now, that this is common knowledge and even movies are called after it I sure hope there are other features as well in place, notifying the controller of a highjack

  • @robertgiles9124
    @robertgiles9124 2 роки тому +4

    With all the people who have jobs in Security at Airports and for Plane travel....why the hell did it take so damn long to figure out YOU NEED to keep the nuts from getting into the Pilot's cabin. Seems like NO ONE in several countries ever came to this conclusion.

    • @bobby1970
      @bobby1970 2 роки тому +5

      Yeah, I never understood that either. It took 911 to change things. In my opinion, these newer security rules should have been put in place when modern passenger service started in the early 1960's.

    • @robertgiles9124
      @robertgiles9124 2 роки тому +3

      @@bobby1970 You'd think one "security" person would pipe up with "Hey I think someone with a fake bomb might fool us into a terrible event guys!" No?

    • @bobby1970
      @bobby1970 2 роки тому

      @@robertgiles9124 Yeah, it's hard to believe they didn't suspect anything.

  • @JJJRRRJJJ
    @JJJRRRJJJ 2 роки тому +1

    How have I never heard of this?

  • @cottagebob2551
    @cottagebob2551 2 роки тому

    First I've heard of this incident. I enjoyed it very much!

  • @B1970T
    @B1970T 2 роки тому +1

    Very nice graphics

  • @engineerskalinera
    @engineerskalinera 2 роки тому +9

    As a train nerd I must say that I am extremely hyped for the train accident video

    • @usmale4915
      @usmale4915 2 роки тому

      Me too. I bet it will be a great episode!

  • @masculandw9454
    @masculandw9454 2 роки тому +3

    Great video as always! Was wondering if you would ever explore the crash that killed Macedonian president Boris Trajkovski.

  • @micheleshively8557
    @micheleshively8557 2 роки тому

    What the heck. I haven't heard about this. Okay! Thanks for it

  • @YesterdaysNews
    @YesterdaysNews 2 роки тому +5

    Next April Fools' Day, consider doing an episode about Wayfarer 515. (*grins*)

    • @Sorunia
      @Sorunia 2 роки тому

      Or Oceanic 815

  • @AISPs
    @AISPs 2 роки тому +2

    It is said Taiwan awarded many mainland hijackers as "anti-communist hero" but they won't do it anymore as they learned how dangerous the hijack can be. Mainland actually flew the plane to Taipei for another hijackers and turned the person to Taiwan police.

  • @juliemanarin4127
    @juliemanarin4127 2 роки тому

    Wow! Crazy story!!

  • @der.Schtefan
    @der.Schtefan 2 роки тому +2

    Not sure what the staff at the airport could have done differently, but I guess there are now procedures for this?

    • @patson420
      @patson420 Рік тому +1

      9/11 hat die Luftfahrt grundlegend verändert. Changed everything regarding this topic "open cockpit door" etcetc

  • @Timmeh_The_tyrant
    @Timmeh_The_tyrant 2 роки тому +2

    We really gotta get a handle on these planes exploding so easily

    • @LOL60345
      @LOL60345 2 роки тому +3

      its sort of unavoidable, because they need to carry fuel, and lots of it.

  • @classicalricky
    @classicalricky Рік тому

    7:37 (ironic timestamp lol) ooh, I love the captainsim 707!

  • @stephanieparker1250
    @stephanieparker1250 2 роки тому +2

    Why the hell did he attack the pilot? I mean obviously he was off his meds anyway but wtf?

  • @smithhehehaha
    @smithhehehaha 8 місяців тому

    The actual footage of the collision came from Guangdong Provincial TV, which they already dispatched news crew to the airport to report this news

  • @oldporkchops
    @oldporkchops Рік тому

    It's great that you included the Chinese characters and used pinyin for the Chinese names. Way to go!

  • @briantaylor9285
    @briantaylor9285 2 роки тому

    That video was horrifying

  • @owen3drblx661
    @owen3drblx661 2 роки тому +1

    Please make a video about the deadliest plane crash in China. China Northwest airlines flight 2303, killing 160 people. The plane exploded in mid air following a structural failure.

  • @pr0gam3r90
    @pr0gam3r90 2 роки тому +1

    Finally!!!😁

  • @theaboy1152
    @theaboy1152 2 роки тому +2

    Cool

  • @toptiergaming6900
    @toptiergaming6900 2 роки тому +1

    My question is why couldn't they have flown to Tiwan?

    • @abebuckingham8198
      @abebuckingham8198 2 роки тому +6

      So during the Chinese revolution after WWII The communists ousted the ruling parties who retreated to Taiwan. They formed separate governments and those governments exist to this day. This was a particularly tense moment in relations between the two because just two years earlier the Tiananmen Square incident made international headlines. By comparison Hong Kong was a British protectorate during that time and had stable relations with both parties and long term plans to reintegrate into mainland China. People tend to think of Asia as a homogenous mass but every country has their own unique cultural and political history.

    • @toptiergaming6900
      @toptiergaming6900 2 роки тому

      @@abebuckingham8198 I was mainly asking about why the captain was so insistent on landing in Hong Kong even when there was a possible bomb onboard

    • @abebuckingham8198
      @abebuckingham8198 2 роки тому +3

      @@toptiergaming6900 Before 9/11 standard procedure was to try and appease hijackers because it had the highest success rate of safely getting everyone else off the plane. He would have been looking for some way to compromised given the current political situation.

  • @snix7613
    @snix7613 2 роки тому +3

    "One member of crew even let him in as he assumed the roses he was holding was somehow a gift for the pilots. Perhaps thinking it was in relation to the moon festival,,,"
    Ah yes the sounds reason to open the cockpit door indeed...

  • @johndaniels4623
    @johndaniels4623 2 роки тому

    OOOOOOOOH A RAIL DISASTER!!!!! I can’t wait! ~~*happy railfoamer noises*~~

  • @lakshmivallabh6936
    @lakshmivallabh6936 2 роки тому +1

    wow w2s will be inetrested

  • @MartinFormanes
    @MartinFormanes 6 місяців тому

    World's First collision that involved 3 planes 😢

  • @lonemaus562
    @lonemaus562 Рік тому

    The situation was out of the captains authoritie why he didn’t listen cost the lives of almost 130 people, dude didn’t have a bomb so in reality no one was in danger till the captain decided to do what he want to do.. in reality it’s kinda his fault all those people died, that’s why things are done differently

  • @sisterSarah364
    @sisterSarah364 Рік тому

    My condolences 🙏🏽 SHALAWAM ❤

  • @erajehaidery2019
    @erajehaidery2019 2 роки тому

    See you on Tuesday pal

  • @Tom8201
    @Tom8201 2 роки тому +1

    Did the 737 have the fuel to make it to Taiwan?

    • @dynasty0019
      @dynasty0019 2 роки тому

      Yes. Even if the plane could not have made it to Taipei, Kinmen Airport, which is Taiwanese controlled and located just off the coast of China, is literally within view of Xiamen by naked eye.

    • @asdf3568
      @asdf3568 2 роки тому

      @@dynasty0019 And was the runway there big enough at the time?

  • @scottl.1568
    @scottl.1568 2 роки тому +1

    Jesus...

  • @kringe700
    @kringe700 2 роки тому +30

    "It's never explained why the captain didn't concede to the hijacker's demand and fly to Taiwan."
    I mean, this happened in China literally a year after the Tiananmen Incident. So, the captain literally had no choice there.

    • @dfuher968
      @dfuher968 2 роки тому +15

      @bobbiebob575 bob Theres a HUGE difference between going to Hong Kong and going to Taiwan. Most of us Westeners fail spectacularly at understanding Eastern philosophy, culture, code of honor etc. I am by no means anywhere near understanding, but I do know, that there wouldve been a huge difference between Hong Kong and Taiwan, and that the captain may very well have felt it completely impossible to go to Taiwan, that it would be a line, that he simply could not cross, coz the consequences of doing so would be much worse and much more far reaching than the hijacker exploding the plane.

    • @abebuckingham8198
      @abebuckingham8198 2 роки тому +5

      @bobbiebob575 bob Hong Kong and Taiwan are not comparable. I would encourage you to look at the history after World War II in more detail as to why that's the case. It's like the difference between being asked to fly through hostile territory or to a neutral third party.

    • @00muinamir
      @00muinamir 2 роки тому +6

      @bobbiebob575 bob flying to Taiwan would have turned this into an international incident and the hijacked plane into a political football. Flying to Hong Kong would not. That's the difference.

    • @asdf3568
      @asdf3568 2 роки тому

      @@dfuher968 What's their to understand? Both Taiwan and Hong Kong are Chinese and Hong Kong was not a part of China back then

    • @yorkshirebikerbitsnbobs
      @yorkshirebikerbitsnbobs 2 роки тому

      @@asdf3568 Or... What's "there" to understand?

  • @noteveryday
    @noteveryday 2 роки тому +4

    Has anyone ever told you that your upload schedule is the exact same as Mini Air Crash Investigation. Every Saturday.

    • @00muinamir
      @00muinamir 2 роки тому +4

      Saturdays are when I binge all the airplane accident vids.

  • @5pilot
    @5pilot 2 роки тому +1

    Why you said we will meet you again in tuesday

    • @scoobydo446
      @scoobydo446 2 роки тому

      In his into he says there be a video on Tuesday because this is a short video, I mean in the description it say that

    • @scoobydo446
      @scoobydo446 2 роки тому

      @indra project, read my first comment for the answer to your question

  • @loriepaix6391
    @loriepaix6391 2 роки тому +3

    New procedures were developed to handle hijackings in China, but the government certainly never addressed the fact that if their citizens were marginalized under an oppressive regime and willing to risk death to escape.

    • @anna_in_aotearoa3166
      @anna_in_aotearoa3166 Рік тому +1

      Yeah, sadly I could completely understand the hijacker's desperation to leave the PRC! Just tragically sad that he chose such a bizarre method & took so many people down with him 😢

  • @megyskermike
    @megyskermike 2 роки тому +1

    Comment for the algo

  • @nicwilson89
    @nicwilson89 2 роки тому +2

    4:40 The pilot may have flicked over to a hot mic, so the tower would be able to hear everything going on in the background

  • @Fenn3k
    @Fenn3k 2 роки тому

    nice video, as always! but you should use better quality maps 😄 it‘s so pixelated and the water is red 🤔

  • @beenaplumber8379
    @beenaplumber8379 10 місяців тому

    I understand that under authoritarian regimes, heads gotta roll when something goes wrong to protect the top bosses, but what possible excuse could there be for blaming anyone on the ground at Guangzhou? The plane never stopped. What could they have done differently? The only actors were the hijacker and the flight crew on the 737.

    • @tiadaid
      @tiadaid 6 місяців тому

      They could have ordered the 757 back to the gate, or ordered the 757 to punch it away from the incoming 737.

  • @asdf3568
    @asdf3568 2 роки тому

    They probably did not have fuel to reach Taiwan safely

  • @samsngdevice5103
    @samsngdevice5103 Рік тому

    No more mint mobile commercials please!

  • @toptiergaming6900
    @toptiergaming6900 2 роки тому

    How the hell did China get all these Boeing aircraft as early as 1980s

    • @farhanatashiga3721
      @farhanatashiga3721 2 роки тому +5

      Don't you know that Chinese international relations had already warm as early as the mid-70s after Nixon's visit? It's not rocket science that they would be able to get those planes as business starts to flourish after the opening up of relations following that visit.

    • @toptiergaming6900
      @toptiergaming6900 2 роки тому

      @@farhanatashiga3721 oh I forgot about that. Also I think Mao died around then so that makes even more sense

  • @cambriaofthevastoceans6721
    @cambriaofthevastoceans6721 2 роки тому

    Bruh stole from his employer and only took 3k? Thems rookie numbers.

  • @ashokmandal93
    @ashokmandal93 2 роки тому +1

    Can you make china eastern airlines flight 5735

  • @anthonyellsmore4532
    @anthonyellsmore4532 Місяць тому

    " a man was sat " 😅😅 can't hide where you're from

  • @Typhoon_Rai2021
    @Typhoon_Rai2021 Рік тому

    Bros almost reapeats in history

  • @mycroftsanchez901
    @mycroftsanchez901 Рік тому

    So avoidable, if the pilot had flown to Taiwan everything would have been ok.

  • @marcox2937
    @marcox2937 2 роки тому +2

    Boeing bounces like a BOEING

  • @prismpyre7653
    @prismpyre7653 5 місяців тому

    pilot woulda been punished for going to taiwan

  • @tommypaget2294
    @tommypaget2294 2 роки тому

    This is hijacking....it’s not an air accident....it’s hijacking. Chinese pilots are good. The hijacker is a bad person.

  • @mtmadigan82
    @mtmadigan82 2 роки тому

    Chinese fire drill

  • @dennischallinor8497
    @dennischallinor8497 2 роки тому +1

    All the security in the world will never detect mental illness. I believe Captains of aircraft should be trained in using weapons and allowed to carry them on all flights.

    • @Eeveelyn
      @Eeveelyn 2 роки тому +4

      The problem is that there have been cases of pilots crashing a plane on purpose, one involving the pilot locking the rest of the crew out of the cockpit to do so if I remember correctly. So if you allow them to carry weapons one could use the element of surprise to take out the other pilot and crash the plane. Also there is a risk that a passenger could knock someone out who isn't expecting an attack and take their weapon. Pilots need to be extremely concentrated at times, having to keep track of different instruments, making calculations in their head, communicating with air traffic control and much more. It's impossible for them to be at high alert all the time for a potential attack and be able to react in time.

    • @sorestedhebytheTumtumtree
      @sorestedhebytheTumtumtree 2 роки тому +1

      @@Eeveelyn speaking of intentional crashes, that most recent crash of a chinese airlines turned out to be intentional as well

  • @clumsytriangle2436
    @clumsytriangle2436 2 роки тому

    Guangzhou is pronounced Gwung'joe' - zhou = joe / zhao - is pronounced like 'now' but with 'j' - so your way of saying it would be spelled " Guangzhao'

    • @ohioguy215
      @ohioguy215 2 роки тому

      Cantonese is pronounced Gwong-Zow. I'm US, my wife is from Guangzhou. She's obviously fluent in Cantonese and Mandarin. Yours is a try at a Mandarin pronunciation. It's actually Gwong-Zoe. English speakers commonly say ...joe.

  • @jessasto947
    @jessasto947 2 роки тому +1

    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was with God in the beginning. 3Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. (John 1:1-3)

  • @antonferreira483
    @antonferreira483 2 роки тому

    Is English your first language? The content is fascinating, but the video is peppered with syntactical glitches.

  • @jiejdiefiej4248
    @jiejdiefiej4248 2 роки тому +1

    Jesus Christ loved us enough to die for us, so that we may have our sins forgiven and inheret eternal life in God's kingdom. Salvation is a gift of God's grace, love, and mercy. Your own goodness can't save you but only by believing and trusting in the Lord Jesus Christ that he will cleanse you with his righteousness so that God may see you nd accept you into his kingdom. May God bless you and may he reveal his glory and his mercy to you this day in Jesus name, Amen.