Cranked Bar with 3D Animation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
  • This video shows that what is cranked bar, why we provide cranked bar in beam with 3D animation of cranked bar. For more details please watch full video.
    Our channel brings civil engineering videos for students of Diploma, B-tech, M-tech, Bachelors and Masters.
    Subscribe our channel for more civil engineering videos.
    / civilengineeringonlyci...
    #Cranked #Bar #Beam

КОМЕНТАРІ • 191

  • @civilengineering94
    @civilengineering94  2 роки тому +1

    Subscribe to my new Channel :)
    ua-cam.com/channels/FON1In_xIuPqWc_GGWawUQ.html

  • @Panther-
    @Panther- 8 місяців тому +1

    The clearest explanation of why you need cranck bars at the point of where the beam meets the column is the best explanation I have seen thus far even doing a structural engineering diploma course which is pretty good, but they never explained it where I got it instantly like this.

  • @MKo-cu5rn
    @MKo-cu5rn Рік тому +1

    Again for the million time i came to a conclusion that youtube is better than all my professors !

  • @sasalshinas9166
    @sasalshinas9166 4 роки тому +6

    I never get this much information from my college. Thank you so much Sir. Thanks a lot. You are a very good teacher .

    • @civilengineering94
      @civilengineering94  4 роки тому

      Thanks #Sasal

    • @guardrailbiter
      @guardrailbiter 4 роки тому

      But, how am I supposed to 'earn' an honorary engineering degree if you don't upload the entire textbook?

  • @arthurtorin7098
    @arthurtorin7098 4 місяці тому +1

    Clearly you fully understand the topic as the visual drawings are great. Although, I struggled to understand a few names at key points. I appreciate that teaching in a second language is no easy thing. Would love to have understood more (Y)

  • @untouchable9917
    @untouchable9917 4 роки тому +14

    The best explanation l have got on positive and negative bending moment of beam l clearly understood it now thanks

  • @ganeshganee9572
    @ganeshganee9572 3 роки тому +3

    Great presentation of concept. Best explanation that i ever seen about actual concepts of reinforcement provision at beam and reason for that.

  • @wingscanemandrae8883
    @wingscanemandrae8883 3 роки тому

    Thank you very much it helps a lot...there's a lot of confusions in rebars but you explained it so clear Godbless you

  • @ManneLearningAcademy
    @ManneLearningAcademy 3 роки тому +1

    Interesting! I am an avid fan of yours. I was learning everytime you uploaded new content. Thank you.

  • @123rockstar2010
    @123rockstar2010 3 роки тому +5

    The diagonal distance (hypD) is 1.42D not 0.42D.
    D = Beam Depth - 2 x Cover - Tie Diameter [10mm or 0.394]
    D = 24in - 2x1.5in - 0.394in
    D = 20.606in
    NOTE: 45°, horizontal length = vertical length = D
    hypD² = D² + D²
    hypD = sqrt( D²+ D²)
    hypD = 29.141in
    k x D = hypD
    k = hypD / D
    k = 29.141 / 20.606
    k = 1.42

  • @angelremigiocardenasgutier2422
    @angelremigiocardenasgutier2422 4 роки тому +1

    Explicación super detallada MAESTRO. Felicitaciones

  • @khondokerazizulhaque357
    @khondokerazizulhaque357 Рік тому +1

    Most of us learn the things from you tuber like u sir ..what's the role of colleges?

  • @cnetInc
    @cnetInc 5 років тому +1

    very clear explanation.Thank you very much sir.best of luck for you...amal from - sri lanka

  • @mohanbabupm5778
    @mohanbabupm5778 3 роки тому

    What as amazing teaching skills god has bestowed on u sir l have grasped the concept immaculately thank u gentleman

  • @ermengolrafael6281
    @ermengolrafael6281 3 роки тому +1

    Excelent explanation, I was asking for it. Thank you.

  • @MasterCivilEngineering
    @MasterCivilEngineering 4 роки тому +1

    Expertise in civil engineering here

  • @dr.v.selvanvelusamy1335
    @dr.v.selvanvelusamy1335 4 роки тому +3

    Thanks for the excellent webinar.Dr.V.Selvan,KCT,Coimbatore-49

  • @Habesha5473
    @Habesha5473 4 роки тому

    very important vedio, even it decrease wastage of Re-bares, for lapping and splice . 10Q a lot

  • @sitaljoy307
    @sitaljoy307 4 роки тому +9

    It's √2D i.e. 1.42D not 0.42D because cranked bars are bent at 45 degree.. It's simple trigonometry

    • @letslearntv2692
      @letslearntv2692 4 роки тому +2

      Sital Joy he is correct man. It’s is 0.42D only not 1.42.D.. D indicates depth of the beam

    • @ronmix1063
      @ronmix1063 4 роки тому

      @@letslearntv2692 you're wrong mn. Common sense how can you connect the the top ang bottom bars if you only use .42 of the depth? It should be more than 100% the length of the depth

    • @cbojones13
      @cbojones13 2 місяці тому

      You are correct. His formula has the bend shorter than the depth of the beam.

  • @anashashmi979
    @anashashmi979 5 років тому +1

    Ur explanation can easily understand thnks sir

  • @dipakhadonge7317
    @dipakhadonge7317 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks sir
    Clearly understood concept in beam section

  • @balashivam6720
    @balashivam6720 4 роки тому

    1)When do we provide cranked bars???
    2)do we need to cranked the steel bars which we r going to provide or we need to put an extra bar ???
    3)do every beams have cranked bar ?
    4)In design steps of beam , is there any step for cranked bar ????

  • @shalzmv1
    @shalzmv1 Рік тому +1

    Sorry to as a question that might be silly....I don't have any background in civil engineering but I am getting a house constructed. So I have been watching some of your videos. As the position of the crank bar is where overlaps are not allowed, does it mean that no overlaps are allowed in a crank bar?

  • @3dworld883
    @3dworld883 4 роки тому

    well done virora..deer kha.. if you are pakhtoon then I hope you will must be like it :-)

  • @mulengajohn3773
    @mulengajohn3773 3 місяці тому +1

    Thanks engineer👍

  • @supreethdraj3749
    @supreethdraj3749 3 роки тому

    Super Sir really want this analysis sir♥️

  • @yodaiam1000
    @yodaiam1000 4 роки тому +2

    I think you meant 1.41 and not 0.42? The hypotenuse of a right triangle can't be less in length than one of the sides of a triangle.
    You also did not explain why you need to crank the bar. Why not just have steel at the ends on the top and on the bottom for the middle. Why add the additional cost of cracking the bar?

  • @sudeeprai9536
    @sudeeprai9536 4 роки тому +4

    Please review the length of cranked bar..
    Its not actually the length of inclined bar..
    0.42D is the combine length along the base of complete base..
    Review using basic Pythagoras theorem..
    U have 45degree and perpendicular D.
    Soo inclination length comes to be D÷sin45
    ...
    0.42 comes after substitution of base length..
    Because when you calculate bar length you already include base length taking length of span

    • @sanjaykumar-dk8uw
      @sanjaykumar-dk8uw 4 роки тому

      Bro there is no problem with length of span...use D only and find length of crank bar and I think D is depth of beam

    • @ronmix1063
      @ronmix1063 4 роки тому +1

      @@sanjaykumar-dk8uw its wrong man. Think about this. If it is .42 of the Depth so .42×24=10.8, the distance of top and bottom bars is 21. So how will you connect that with only having 10.8 inches of length

  • @kidslearninguni56
    @kidslearninguni56 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much.. very nice lecture sir

  • @loiccooper1425
    @loiccooper1425 2 роки тому

    Thanks for this video

  • @sasalshinas9166
    @sasalshinas9166 4 роки тому +1

    Sir , please do some videos about how to calculate the total length of a bend up bars with hook and tell some interview questions too....

  • @phyohtetkoko929
    @phyohtetkoko929 2 роки тому

    Thanks For Teaching Sir

  • @ks-pi1ut
    @ks-pi1ut 2 роки тому

    Good information sir

  • @101raziel905
    @101raziel905 6 місяців тому +1

    Can you upload how to calculate a concrete slab on piles straight with no culmbs like a bridg in water or a ro ro platform please 🙏

  • @kennedy1727
    @kennedy1727 4 роки тому

    Nice explanation video sir thank you for this video sir

  • @anieschaudhary7684
    @anieschaudhary7684 4 роки тому +3

    My question is "if its placed in whatever angle i.e 45° in this case, then the length of the cranked will automatically be determined...right??

  • @mohamedag8366
    @mohamedag8366 3 роки тому +1

    How did you calculate L = 0.42 *D ? which code did you follow?

  • @Lalekrushna
    @Lalekrushna 4 роки тому

    Great sir

  • @kennedy1727
    @kennedy1727 5 років тому +1

    Sir nice video but I have doubt how can 8.8 inch bar can reach bottom of 1.5 inch in slanting conditions please explain me

  • @karanamjbrao7889
    @karanamjbrao7889 4 роки тому +1

    Pl.ae
    Share all your videos

  • @vreddyb4552
    @vreddyb4552 3 роки тому

    Super, Wonderful

  • @khadarvalipathan5821
    @khadarvalipathan5821 5 років тому

    superb explanation...thank u sir

  • @nizamali7027
    @nizamali7027 7 місяців тому +1

    Nice

  • @sukantaroy1202
    @sukantaroy1202 4 роки тому +1

    If it's 45degree angle , then the length of Crank must be equal to Diagonal length , can be derived by Pithagorus theorem (Right angle triangle), i.e 1.42*d or 1.42*21".
    I Dnt think ur formula is right as per geometry atleast.

  • @kumaranshankar9463
    @kumaranshankar9463 4 роки тому

    Wow thanku you I understand well

  • @Arun930
    @Arun930 4 роки тому

    Excellent Effort! Keep Rocking

  • @prafulkindo5445
    @prafulkindo5445 3 роки тому

    Well done.!

  • @cbojones13
    @cbojones13 2 місяці тому +1

    Formula for bend length is incorrect. Should be 1.42 x D

  • @awqpak
    @awqpak 4 роки тому +1

    Are cranked bars required if the beam is laid on earth soil?

  • @surveyingengineeringdesigninfo
    @surveyingengineeringdesigninfo 3 роки тому

    good

  • @gopalvaer5651
    @gopalvaer5651 5 років тому +3

    What are effect if used two tops over two pillars instead of CRANKS!
    DOES IT SAME EFFECT OR NOT?
    PLEASE RESPONSE

    • @69bibin
      @69bibin 5 років тому +5

      basically, it is the same. this method is prospected to be more economical than without cranks. however, some standard doesn't allow cranking more than 1:6. Also the bending skill on producing cranks like this is a bit hard (especially > 25 mm bars).

  • @elizabeth3521
    @elizabeth3521 2 роки тому

    Masterclass

  • @ranjankumarsahoo6326
    @ranjankumarsahoo6326 4 роки тому

    Great

  • @tajamulhussain3682
    @tajamulhussain3682 4 роки тому

    Sir would you please upload a video on how we decide the position on slabs as well as on beams to crank the bars.i mean thumb rules to find the location on beams and slabs where bars will be cranked

  • @ferozahmed3353
    @ferozahmed3353 4 роки тому

    Good explanation!

  • @mehrzadrashidkhani3250
    @mehrzadrashidkhani3250 3 роки тому

    Thank you Sir.
    🙏🙏🙏

  • @prajwalmasurkar9487
    @prajwalmasurkar9487 4 роки тому +1

    Where provide crank bar in plint beam

  • @basavarajkv7091
    @basavarajkv7091 4 роки тому

    Excellent ,

  • @inhinyerongsibil6383
    @inhinyerongsibil6383 4 роки тому

    Nice content this is usefull for us

  • @russmancherose6946
    @russmancherose6946 4 роки тому +1

    Good

  • @elxanhafizli736
    @elxanhafizli736 5 років тому +1

    My question is : is crancked bar also for save money? I am askim because of why you did not use 6bars for beam. 6bars are safely they can work positive and negative loads easily. Could u please answer my question? Many thanks

    • @civilengineering94
      @civilengineering94  5 років тому +2

      yes cranked bar are economical as compare to other options

  • @fathimarumeena4135
    @fathimarumeena4135 3 роки тому

    Sir, how to place his crank bar for a rcc beam which is upstanding (above slab) 13" (with slab 5" = 18").
    Beam Length is 20'

  • @anashashmi979
    @anashashmi979 5 років тому +1

    Thanks bro

  • @jagadishk639
    @jagadishk639 4 роки тому +2

    How inclined length of crank bar is less than half( 0.42) of straight depth. I think there is some correction.

    • @sitaljoy307
      @sitaljoy307 4 роки тому +1

      It's √2D or 1.42D not 0.42D.
      Simple trigonometry calculation

    • @jagadishk639
      @jagadishk639 4 роки тому

      @@sitaljoy307 √2d only for 45° right angle triangle.

    • @jagadishk639
      @jagadishk639 4 роки тому

      @@sitaljoy307 video thumbnail itself showing length is 0.42D.

    • @sitaljoy307
      @sitaljoy307 4 роки тому

      @@jagadishk639 for whatever angle provided cranked bar length is always greater than D.. Any value less than D is impractical

    • @jagadishk639
      @jagadishk639 4 роки тому

      @@sitaljoy307 I am asking for that correction 😁

  • @DGDG0000000
    @DGDG0000000 4 роки тому

    Vert good, i didn't know that. i know pre constraint tensioning rebar beam.

  • @MegaCrap90
    @MegaCrap90 3 роки тому

    how to know at what distance the crank should be made?

  • @AlejandroCruz67
    @AlejandroCruz67 4 роки тому

    If i had learned this before at the University...

  • @zoteasailofs1526
    @zoteasailofs1526 2 роки тому

    I like it

  • @tsclly2377
    @tsclly2377 4 роки тому

    so what about using 3-4" galvanized nails mixed in the cement batch for the cost savings in time one could add 100% more steel in mass ..

  • @techirupchi5073
    @techirupchi5073 2 роки тому

    Whether we should provide single crank or double crank bar in a beam??

  • @rayaytatatuntatnafurtat2029
    @rayaytatatuntatnafurtat2029 3 роки тому

    Thank you.

  • @johnathanlivingstonseagull5524
    @johnathanlivingstonseagull5524 4 роки тому

    Distance is offset of the crank but what is that point from midspan? 1/3rd?

  • @jaimehernandezperez5267
    @jaimehernandezperez5267 4 роки тому

    Perdón es 21/0.7071=29.7, o sea 21/sen45°=29.7. Tambien puede ser 1.414x21=29.7.

  • @abdurrahim3605
    @abdurrahim3605 2 роки тому

    Thanks

  • @jaimehernandezperez5267
    @jaimehernandezperez5267 4 роки тому

    La respuesta correcta es 21"x0.7071=29.7". Creo que esto fué a ver si ponen atención.

  • @doctormcgoveran2194
    @doctormcgoveran2194 4 роки тому

    I am curious why not three bars with the top two over lapping the bottom?

  • @gopalvaer5651
    @gopalvaer5651 5 років тому +8

    Crank bends,
    8.8 " does not fit within your (24' -3") = 21" height beam.

    • @shobanbabuketavathu5783
      @shobanbabuketavathu5783 5 років тому

      Yes

    • @liasdigitalmedia7594
      @liasdigitalmedia7594 5 років тому

      Gopal Va'er 59

    • @anieschaudhary7684
      @anieschaudhary7684 4 роки тому +2

      Yes....i have a similar confusion. If the angle is maintained at 45°, then the length of the cranked bar will automatically be determined..... but still 0.42 doesnot work...1.42 is correct

    • @BasiCommonSense
      @BasiCommonSense 4 роки тому

      @@anieschaudhary7684 comon guyz create a square at 21 inch x 21 inch find the length between 2 points
      there u go

    • @gilmorebacud9396
      @gilmorebacud9396 4 роки тому

      0.42 x D = Hypotenuse.
      How come that D is longer than the hypotenuse. I think you miss + D sir.

  • @RaviShankar-uk2bd
    @RaviShankar-uk2bd 5 років тому +1

    What should be the angle made for crank bars?

  • @sheikhkais4140
    @sheikhkais4140 5 років тому

    Fantastic

  • @mannexyee737
    @mannexyee737 3 роки тому

    Youre placing your crank bar at the opposite. A crank bar is just the same design as a lift spring of a vehicle or the arc of an old bridge.

  • @devilzpwb7596
    @devilzpwb7596 4 роки тому +1

    Sound is very low n not clear...

  • @engineermoon
    @engineermoon 5 років тому

    Thnks alot sir

  • @sakilsamrat1542
    @sakilsamrat1542 5 років тому

    Excellent

  • @iacsse6381
    @iacsse6381 4 роки тому

    What about columns bending movement? Can crank transfer directly from a column to another? Today lifted bars...

    • @MitzvosGolem1
      @MitzvosGolem1 4 роки тому

      Yes determined by advanced moment frame analysis as Finite element analysis method etc.

  • @chennojumahender2087
    @chennojumahender2087 2 роки тому

    0.42D may not be correct
    Diagonal length will be more than D

  • @sheikhkais4140
    @sheikhkais4140 5 років тому

    Thank u sir

  • @johnhaokip4008
    @johnhaokip4008 4 роки тому

    Is it possible to remove the diagonal beam i. e which is put at 45°

    • @johnhaokip4008
      @johnhaokip4008 4 роки тому

      Or is it a different type of crank bar design. Can you differentiate their function.

  • @lalitblood9022
    @lalitblood9022 2 роки тому

    YOU ARE WRONG SIR... Length of Cranked bar should be greater than D. So Length of Cranked bar = 1.42 D

  • @christiesebaratnam9155
    @christiesebaratnam9155 5 років тому +4

    This is an outdated design . According to the design codes in the past more than 30 years , there is the requirement for certain amount of positive moment reinforcement to be anchored past the face of support . The anchorage past the face the support should be able to develop a force of 1.5x shear force at the support

  • @yarasanisagarbabu2320
    @yarasanisagarbabu2320 3 роки тому

    There is a slab with intermediate beam
    How do we take shorter span and longer span
    Column to column
    Or
    Is intermediate beam
    Dicides the shorter span and longer span
    Please clarify my doubt

  • @saddamislam9900
    @saddamislam9900 2 роки тому

    Sir ji crank length must be 1.42D not 0.42D.

  • @kevinnewell2561
    @kevinnewell2561 3 роки тому

    Where u put lapping in the slabs

  • @hectorolimpogarciasandoval5123
    @hectorolimpogarciasandoval5123 4 роки тому

    Excelente explicación...solo que las letras negras no dejan ver la explicacion en el pizarron.

  • @manhessami
    @manhessami 5 років тому

    I am agree with gopal and think the same.

  • @meersarwar3604
    @meersarwar3604 4 роки тому +2

    Use either 45 degree or 0.42d.not logical to use both lol

  • @tekdhant3731
    @tekdhant3731 4 роки тому

    What’s the name of music played in the start of video??

  • @jagdeezlal3982
    @jagdeezlal3982 3 роки тому

    The length of the crank bar should be 1.42 D not 0.42 D

  • @madiha1750
    @madiha1750 5 років тому

    Is there any anchor bars in the upper side

    • @civilengineering94
      @civilengineering94  5 років тому

      2 compression bars must be there, other bars depends on your design

  • @MegaBoy011
    @MegaBoy011 3 роки тому

    Crank bar length formula is wrong. Basic trigonometry.

  • @lopeinario6600
    @lopeinario6600 4 роки тому

    the measure is not diagonal but horizontal , sorry