7 Fascinating American Civil War Facts You May or May Not Know

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 43

  • @attilay2k224
    @attilay2k224 2 роки тому +7

    I can't wait to hear what facts you'll be bringing us this time

  • @thegodlygoatgamer
    @thegodlygoatgamer 2 роки тому +3

    Ah one of my favorite subjects, can’t wait

  • @hr0727
    @hr0727 2 роки тому +4

    Could you make a video on WW1 next? Loving the videos guys keep it coming!! 💯💯💯

  • @CaseyAvalon
    @CaseyAvalon 2 роки тому +1

    Great video. The civil war was fascinating. Always wanted to do like a tour of the locations.

  • @MichaelNeeley-ub8wg
    @MichaelNeeley-ub8wg 9 місяців тому

    This is such a good video the narration and music tone is really good

  • @SpectralDivisionIHM
    @SpectralDivisionIHM 2 роки тому

    Loved the video! Keep up the good work!

  • @ander1725
    @ander1725 2 роки тому +2

    I want to hear about the lemoyne raiders plz

  • @GRH_Roadhouse
    @GRH_Roadhouse 2 роки тому +4

    Ain't nothing civil about war that's all I know
    Roadhouse

    • @ilikepigeons6101
      @ilikepigeons6101 2 роки тому

      I don't even know why "civil wars" have "civil" in them

    • @Jigsaw0g
      @Jigsaw0g 6 місяців тому +1

      @@ilikepigeons6101 Civil typically refers to the citizens when it comes to dictionary definitions so i always to Civil War as "War of or between the citizens"

  • @ugfpandas007
    @ugfpandas007 2 роки тому +1

    Fizhy more LA Norie?

  • @pascalg16
    @pascalg16 2 роки тому

    3:17 "Fackt free"

  • @epicm999
    @epicm999 2 роки тому +1

    Randomly got recommended to me.

  • @trailerparksupervisor7046
    @trailerparksupervisor7046 2 роки тому +3

    “General Lee”, not “Commander Lee”.

    • @hr0727
      @hr0727 2 роки тому +2

      Ah who cares?!??

    • @trailerparksupervisor7046
      @trailerparksupervisor7046 2 роки тому +3

      @@hr0727 it’s a video about history, they should get the facts right.

  • @trinitysrain4686
    @trinitysrain4686 2 роки тому

    Hadn’t quite known about 2

  • @richarddolan1310
    @richarddolan1310 2 роки тому +1

    Booth was not a confederate spy just sympathetic to the confederate cause. Ps: just something I noticed I love the videos and the channel!

    • @Fizhy
      @Fizhy 2 роки тому

      We appreciate the correction

    • @richarddolan1310
      @richarddolan1310 2 роки тому

      @Jereme Hines No I agree that he was a confederate die hard through and through I labeled him as just a sympathetic because he wasn’t on official confederate business as a spy because the war ended days earlier and even when the war was on he was never officially listed as a confederate at least to my knowledge.

  • @nogoodhandlesavailable
    @nogoodhandlesavailable Рік тому

    The war of northern aggression wasn't about slavery. It wasn't even a proper civil war, as a civil war is fighting for control of one government. What the victors renamed the civil war was more accurately a succession movement that was violently opposed. History is written by the victors.

  • @pascalg16
    @pascalg16 2 роки тому +1

    Hey Aiden. You can try sounding less monotonous. Other than that, good work.

    • @aidantonge2063
      @aidantonge2063 2 роки тому

      Hey gonna try and work on it! First time doing any sort of voice over thing since high school!

    • @DecadesVideos
      @DecadesVideos  2 роки тому

      It's his first attempt at audio recording, considering that we don't think he did too bad.

    • @ArcturosX
      @ArcturosX 2 роки тому

      I’m not sure if that’s entirely necessary. The guy who does the voice overs for “The Operations Room” channel has quite the monotonous voice…and he’s extremely successful with incredible videos. Just throwing that out there.

  • @leojablonski2309
    @leojablonski2309 9 місяців тому

    Stick to monthy pythoon to lampoon

  • @Whammo77
    @Whammo77 11 місяців тому +1

    You lost me in the first minute when you said the war was about slavery. WRONG!!!

  • @jeffb-c
    @jeffb-c 2 роки тому +5

    The southern states weren’t concerned with states rights, they were specifically concerned with the institution of slavery - please dont get this twisted

    • @jacksonguillory8114
      @jacksonguillory8114 2 роки тому +1

      Technically it was a bit of both :)

    • @morammofilmsph1540
      @morammofilmsph1540 2 роки тому

      It was state's rights
      ....to own slaves

    • @TheTacticalHillbilly
      @TheTacticalHillbilly 9 місяців тому

      😁😆😅🤣😂

    • @Nixonfam
      @Nixonfam 6 місяців тому

      600,000 men didn’t die for your ancestors. It was way deeper than that

    • @elcheekoful
      @elcheekoful 3 місяці тому

      See this is the part that is crazy to me. Why would hundreds of thousands of conderate soldiers die for a war over Slavery. When only like 7% of the total population owned slaves? Only the ultra rich owned slaves..Also you think the North cared about African Americans, they still treated them horribly after the war ended..Slavery was already illegal in the Northern states like mid way through the war. So why would thousands of people be dying for the north when they had fixed the slavery problem, in there homeland..See the whole idea the War was fought over Slavery being ethically wrong,, The facts do not add up.

  • @Craterfist
    @Craterfist Рік тому +1

    Reminder that "states' rights" is a euphemism, not an ideology, it exists solely to smuggle through every horrific idea from slavery to anti-LGBT+ dogma to anti-civil rights, to many many more.