Who is the damned idiot that thought that squeezing more aircraft into less space could ever be safer? I see no benefit except to undertakers/funeral directors. I predict disaster.
I would think that the minimum separation can be further reduced due to the tech. That being said cramming more traffic in less space is a by product of that. I guess its a tradeoff, with new ADS-B, you have either safer airways (maintaining same traffic density) or more traffic density (maintaining about the same safety margin).
Nice video. pls also include that at 10000MSL, if you are below 2500ft AGL, you don't require ADS-B.
aUTOMATIC • dEPENDENT • sURVEILLANCE • bROADCAST
We know. We saw the video.
well done
All the print is out-of-focus.
Tried spectacles?
Thank you.
Thanks a lot 🙏🚁🙏
Bil
Who is the damned idiot that thought that squeezing more aircraft into less space could ever be safer? I see no benefit except to undertakers/funeral directors. I predict disaster.
I would think that the minimum separation can be further reduced due to the tech. That being said cramming more traffic in less space is a by product of that. I guess its a tradeoff, with new ADS-B, you have either safer airways (maintaining same traffic density) or more traffic density (maintaining about the same safety margin).
Hi, i'm from the future (2020). And the plane with ADS-B installed is has more efficient flight than the other who doesn't use ADS-B
@@flankerskioneniner4290 Time Traveler here also. Plenty of space now unfortunately.
@@bluenightgrinner8620 Yeah.. lol. Thank God, i got friend here.
@@flankerskioneniner4290 Same. But driving each other crazy! Better to be crazy with company though 😉