FIDIC standards&norms should be followed by all big/mega national/international contracts by all nations/Co.s/ Engineers / Contractors / Govts for quality & safety
The American Bar Association website has an article which strongly disagrees with the viewpoint given in this video on the use of the phrase "represents and warrants". The article, titled 'The Phrase "Represents and Warrants" Is Pointless and Confusing', points to (1) the fact that warranties do not exist in every contract that representations do, (2) a lack of any case law supporting the idea that choice of verb between "represents", "warrants", or "represents and warrants" has an actual effect on remedies used, and (3) the legal strangeness that would ensue if semantic determination of whether something was a representation or warranty was equated with choice of verb rather than by relevant laws such as the uniform commercial code. I'm curious if anyone has a data-backed response to any of those arguments.
Great presentation, is the material used in this presentation or PPT available online, would be ideal.
FIDIC standards&norms should be followed by all big/mega national/international contracts
by all nations/Co.s/ Engineers / Contractors / Govts for quality & safety
This was very helpful, thank you for uploading!
Very good presentation
Can I get a copy of this PPT presentation?
Walker Mark Walker Ronald Wilson Paul
Excellent presentation!!
This video is hour 33 mins.why does it say 90 mins. Breach of contract
1 hour and 33 minutes. You may need to put on your eyeglasses before diving into the legal field.
The American Bar Association website has an article which strongly disagrees with the viewpoint given in this video on the use of the phrase "represents and warrants". The article, titled 'The Phrase "Represents and Warrants" Is Pointless and Confusing', points to (1) the fact that warranties do not exist in every contract that representations do, (2) a lack of any case law supporting the idea that choice of verb between "represents", "warrants", or "represents and warrants" has an actual effect on remedies used, and (3) the legal strangeness that would ensue if semantic determination of whether something was a representation or warranty was equated with choice of verb rather than by relevant laws such as the uniform commercial code. I'm curious if anyone has a data-backed response to any of those arguments.
So what's the alternative?
awful audio.
thanks
great presentation but terrible video quality
Here is CORBIN...?
how can I get this presentation??
👏👏👏👏👏👏