One small little detail I wish they would have included in hogwarts legacy is; I wish the paintings were asleep at night like they are in the movies. They're always awake lol
Love the detailing and physics in Legacy, but still gotta appreciate what they were able to pull off in the early and late 2000s, given the crappy budget and limited HW capability. My favourite of the franchise used to be the Chamber of Secrets in 2002. The environment was immersive and haunting.
@@Tsrashi CoS PS2 has to be my favorite HP game (until I get my hands on HL, naturally). And speaking of Jeremy Soule, I'd love to see a soundtrack replacement mod where they use his music and James Hannigan's from Order of The Phoenix onwards.
One thing I’ll add as an avid book reader. I noticed that a lot of features in Hogwarts legacy are based of descriptions from the book rather than how it shows up in the movie. A lot of the exterior is similar to the movies but inside seems more based on the book description. Two easy examples is the Grand Stair Case in Hogwarts Legacy is more based on how the book describes the area rather than what’s shown in the movie. The second example is the location of the Common room entrance. The movie shows the entrance to be in the area of the grand staircase but in the book it describes the entrance being close to the staircase but down its own hall way as we see in Hogwarts Legacy. I love both versions but can definitely appreciate the attention given from the books honestly
I was nerding out ... - the honeydukes shortcut behind the Witch statue. - entering the kitchens by tickling the pear on the portrait So many direct references from the books I teared up and I haven't read the books in ages I'll be honest but instant whiplash.
One thing i remember from the order of the phoenix game is that you could attack any random student and they would duel you. It was so disappointing to find out that in legacy the students wouldn't even react at all if you are casting spells at them.
@@claymorexx the fuck do you mean cash grab? Hogwarts legacy is in no way a cash grab. It has LITERALLY only one thing you can buy in game with real money which is the dark arts pack and you can totally not buy it.
@@Freyia_xo All the games i can think from that year (or before) looked lightyears better than this. Killzone 2, MGS4, Uncharted 2, Resident Evil 5, L4D2, Batman Arkham Asylum, Battlefield Bad Company (which also introduced destructible enviroments to that series), Gears of War 1 & 2... even going back to 2007 you got stuff like Halo 3, BioShock, COD4 (i'd mention Crysis but pretty much nothing could compete with that game until the next generation). I'm surprised just how many likes that original comment has, honestly, either people are remembering wrong or they never experienced the PS3-X360 era.
Modern graphic Yes, maybe some quality of life improvements definitely, but a remaster rather than a remake is what I'd love. I'm having heavy nostalgia for PS2 Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. I'd love a remaster if that gem and the PS2 Chamber of secrets
Why changing the combat style? The analog thing was cool to me. It feels like having a REAL wand in your hand, I wish the Switch version had remote commands, what a shame 😔
They were rated pretty harshly back in the day by reviewers. However myself and many others enjoyed these games and I think overtime they're considered great games. I'd go as far as to say some of the best of the PS2 era. Definitely worth checking out even today.
Another nice thing in my opinion was the manual spell casting. You actually had to make specific mouse movements to cast spells and had to remember the movements. I wish this was at least an option in legacy
@@alex786 they could have made combos for controler gameplay too instead of having 4 spells sloted and then changing them. I think it would have actually improved fighting.
Half blood prince potion making was the biggest part i miss. Now You just select the potion and it makes it for you. But in half blood prince it was so entertaining to make all these potions. Trying to make the perfect potion.
Another important detail in old Harry Potter games was how long they had to make them, they needed to release them quickly after each movie so they didn't have like 4-6 years that games like Hogwarts Legacy and others have. Just one to two years and after release instantly you need to start working on the other.
Though some of the old games reused a lot of things from previous games. Ps2 Sorcerer's Stone and Chamber of Secrets had basically the same castle. Also Order of the Phoenix and Half Blood Prince were very similar. The biggest difference can be seen between Prisoner of Azkaban and Order the Phoenix and inbetween those they had that rushed dumbsterfire of Goblet of Fire. Also the games were a lot shorter in terms of story and world. Not saying smaller size is automatically a bad thing but it definitely affects the time needed for development.
Yeah that game was so awesome! The in-game map was like the marauder's map. And you could just attack any random student and they would duel you, i loved that detail. In legacy the students don't even react if you're shooting spells right at them.
In this case, sure, but in many, if not most modern games, the warm coloring and overly realistic environments - are pretty boring, overused and make locations seem less creative/artistic, more similar to one another. Also, artists often can't pull out details without making your eyes having a hard time to focus on one particular thing with all the "Visual noise" you see on the screen. Which is why the older, more outdated technology actually made games look better, in a way, because game developers had limited space and resources which's forced them to only show you what they really wanted to show you, without all the extra unnecessary foliage, rocks, etc. - which often is just copy pasted and pretty randomly spread across the ground. This is also why Open World games are so boring to look at / explore, for the most part.
Very strange but I felt more life in the npcs of the old games, it seemed that they were really seeing me. In Legacy sometimes it seems like they don't notice you.
@@dikaduha6891 You're also supposed to be public attention in Hogwarts Legacy too with how you attended Hogwarts on the fift year and joined the ceremony late. You have dialogues about you everytime you see other students and all.
The NPCs acted very erratically during cutscenes in legacy, sometimes they would walk back and forth when the camera switched focus 🙄lmfao they would look like they were obviously eavesdropping LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Yeah they mostly look at you and curse at you mostly Slytherins for ex "Potty Potter" and "Mudblood when Hermione is with you" And so many things. Best thing you can beat every student up anytime
We have to remember that hogwarts legacy takes place 100 years before Harry, and in the books, the castle seems to be somewhat sentient, so the castle will and can somewhat change how it looks, if I remember the 7th book correctly the castle literally helps rebuild its self
No, it's not because of that, Hogwarts didn't change Its appearance. It's just the devopers of the game based their Hogwarts on its depiction from the books rather than films. So Hogwarts Legacy is just closer to the canon
In my headcanon Hogwarts can change its appearance and size depending on how many students attend Hogwarts. For example the common rooms and great hall can get bigger or smaller.
While the 2009 one focuses much more on the fidelity of the films (not that it is more faithful than the hogwarts legacy) but I feel that it brings a more "faithful" feeling, the Hogwarts legacy brings a more glamorous and detailed hogwarts, while in the films it is very "finished" and very old
That's my feeling towards Hogwarts Legacy too compared to the movies. Hogwarts doesn't have the ambience and look of an ancient 1000 year old castle. It leans way too much on the glamorous side.
My thought is because Hogwarts Legacy's timeline is different. It's way way back before Harry Potter which may be the reason why the castle is not that worn out yet. I read somewhere that the game's timeline took place around the 1890s, that's about a century before the events in the Harry Potter books and films. The first wizarding war hasn't taken place yet.
@@mmalhao06 Being a Christian (the follower of Christ): - calls upon the name of THE LORD: Psalms 145:18 , Psalms 55:16 , Isaiah 55:6 - coming to repentance, Luke 5:32 - going through new birth (baptized by the SPIRIT and by the water), 1 Corinthians 12:13 , John 3:7 - coming out from Babylon (the city life), Revelation 18:4 - flees from fornication: 1 Corinthians 6:18 , 1 Thessalonians 4:3 - analysing their own life and life in general, 2 Corinthians 13:5 - have their Inner mans eyes and ears open: Mark 8:18 , 2 Chronicles 7:15 , Matthew 13:16 - Judges - judges - judges, themselves and life in general in: John 7:24 - seeks out 1st the KINGDOM OF GOD: Matthew 6:33 - have no worries nor thoughts about what they shall eat or wear: Matthew 6:31 , Luke 12:22 , Matthew 6:25 , Luke 12:29 - is not a friend with the world, but exposes the wicked: Ephesians 5:11 , Psalms 26:5 , James 4:4 - goes through the persecution: Luke 6:22 , Matthew 5:44 ,John 15:18 , 1 John 3:13 - has outworldly peace: John 14:27 - fears not any man, but has the sobering fear of GOD in him: Matthew 10:28 , 1 John 4:18 - rightly dividing the word of truth: 2 Timothy 2:15 - is both, the believer of the word and the doer of it also: James 1:23 , Matthew 7:21 - have no idols not graven images: Isaiah 42:17 , Micah 5:13 , Isaiah 42:8 , Deuteronomy 7:5 , Habakkuk 2:18 Psalms 78:58 - worship GOD in SPIRIT AND IN TRUTH: John 4:24 - are peacemakers: Matthew 5:9, Hebrews 12:14 , Romans 12:18 - are sober minded: 1 Peter 1:13 , Titus 2:6 , Titus 2:2 , 1 Peter 4:7 , 1 Peter 5:8
@@tinbear1121 and, according to your beautiful logic, a thousand-year-old castle is brand new, and after some hundred years it has grown old It stood new for a thousand years, and sharply dilapidated in a hundred years.
It’s surprising graphically how well the old games hold up, I adore HL as it really does feel like a huge open world. And the fact you can walk or fly miles from the castle and land pretty much every where and explore and do side quests makes it so immersive. I’m playing HL for the first time and it’s up in my top 5 all time favourite games. The detail is just incredible and I’m so grateful we got to play it .
@@morannonnorstund254 No thats not true. In the books they are NOT constantly moving. It is just mentioned, that they can lead on i.e. Friday somewhere else than on Thursday (but also only some staircases).
The Harry Potter games have assists in sharp turns and rotate the camera automatically so that’s why is easier but not better, in Hogwarts Legacy you control every single movement and camera angle
@@Arachnophobia20 Wow that's a long time😂 But I think a pure Quidditch game wouldn't meet today's expectitions, I think it will akways be integrated into another, bigger game.
For those who say that Half-Blood Prince feels weird at times, that's because they recycled everything that was done in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, they only added a couple of areas and the history of the Half-Blood Prince, but the rest being the map, the spells, the animations, the combat system all comes from Order of the Phoenix.
@@Night_frost It’s because it’s been refined from the previous game. It’s a normal thing for studios to do. Except in normal video game titles they tend to have the budget/expectation to increase graphics quality. Which almost never happens for movie tie in games.
@@Night_frost wasn't HBP utter shit, extremely buggy and nearly all about it was just collecting stuff? I have the first 5 games and I remember that I didn't get the 6th because it was supposed to be pretty bad and very buggy too or having stuff coded in a way that makes small "mistakes" made by the player very punishing.
Two distinctions I can remember is that ‘accio’ is pronounced differently in earlier games (like ‘axe-io’) and potions brewing in THBP was a lot more fun as a mini game, even if it was hard to brew amortentia
The map from the Half-Blood Prince is very accurate to the movies. Hogwarts Legacy has changed a lot, which is understandable and fine, but the Half-Blood Prince map is, from what I can see, almost a complete recreation of the sets in the movies, which I really appreciated back in the day and is why I enjoyed it so much Edit: This is not a critique of Hogwarts Legacy or the books. I Just simply explained why I loved the old game
I got really tired of the bleakness after seeing it in so many movies (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 part 1 and 7 part 2) Too depressive considering it's supposed to be a world of magic
I miss it too. I was expecting Hogwarts Legacy to look like Prisoner of Azkaban movie in termd of atmosphere. But instead it feels too bright and colorful, almost like a Sims game.
@@HULK-HOGAN1i miss it cause i played it as a kid. I didnt really think of it as bleak and dark just magical and kinda creepy at times but really really cool like how a kid would lol
That's because Harry's model was just made bigger, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince recycles everything that was done in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, just added a couple of areas, the history of the Half- Blood Prince and practically nothing else, the spells, the animations all come from Order of the Phoenix
you compared Levioso from Hogwards Legacy with Wingardium Leviosa from Harry Potter, but later in game (Hogwards Legacy) you unlock Wingardium Leviosa, witch is more advanced than Levioso
Half Blood Prince still looks pretty nice, but in terms of gameplay, it was just a shallow walking simulator throwing fetch quest after fetch quest to distract the player. The first 3 HP games, particularly the PS2 versions, while taking some liberties in how they depicted Hogwarts, were much more in line with Hogwarts Legacy's scope. Even Order of the Phoenix, while sharing the same core gameplay as HBP, had more interesting minigames.
@@amysteriousviewer3772 If you put HBP on the same boat as Legacy, you obviously never played either. Hogwarts Legacy has actual dungeons, hordes of enemies, actual combos, puzzles to solve, harvesting potion ingredients, stealth. HBP just makes you walk around the castle and do the same 3 things : potions, broken duels, on-rail Quidditch. You're obviously talking aimlessly here.
@@yrooxrksvi7142 I didn't put them on the same level I said that Hogwarts Legacy has shallow gameplay and fetch quests because it does. It has all those things you listed but none of them have any depth. It's a well designed world with barley anything worthwhile to do in it. Dungeons are short, Puzzles are repetitive and dead simple, collectibles are boring, combat is spamming the same 4 spells (yellow, purple, red + basic cast) over and over, brewing potions is literally just a menu, stealth is overpowered because the AI is so braindead. And the worst thing is that the only reward for doing anything is boring loot with arbitrary stats that don't have any tangible impact on gameplay.
@@amysteriousviewer3772 I disagree on the dungeons length, some may be shorter than others, but overall they last enough. Puzzles being repetitive is nothing new to Harry Potter games, I do wish there were more collectibles than money loot, clothes and guide pages though. As for combat, I have some gripes with how some spells have been handled : I don't like Stupefy being tied ONLY to counters and Petrificus Totalus strictly to stealth, as Glacius and Arresto Momentum feel like weaker versions that could have been used a bit more for interacting with the enviroment than just combat.
I agree. I remember playing the first few harry potter games and loving them. But then they stopped making it open world, the scope was diminished, so I stopped buying them.
I'm not gonna lie, I'd prefer having to wait for the grand staircase instead of it just appearing when you need it. I also like its square and angular design more than the spiral staircase in Hogwarts legacy.
I played both OotP and HBP on Wii and they were absolutely great games! The side-to-side comparison here makes it look quite harsh, but Hogwarts was just as big than in HL, without all the loading between towers. I actually preferred Hogwarts' map in the Wii games, it had more locations from the movies and made a bit more sense to me. The entire Defence Against the Dark Arts Tower with the baroque style and music is a weird addition in my opinion. I'm wondering where that concept came from...
Lack of interactions with students at Hogwarts Legacy. The world feels dead... and that makes me sad. There are no mini-games, no duels with anyone. Of course, the detail and world are impressive, but for me it could have been better, we are waiting for a DLC or something. If I were the developers, I would add a co-op mode. To play with friends)
Well, it also may be cuz the story is set a century earlier than the films so who knows, they may have done renovations or changed things in a hundred years.
I've only played HL and I love that the castle isn't dark all throughout (except for places not usually explored by students) In daytime, it has a warmer feeling and feels very student appropriate as it gets. But come night time, it definitely feels eerie. I also should note that this Hogwarts is from an earlier timeline, a century before Harry's or even Dumbledore's time. So the castle is understandably in good condition. The Wizarding War first occurred in the 19th century which would explain why the Hogwarts we know is not as "glamorous" as it used to be. Also, Filch is a terrible caretaker compared to Gladwin Moon. See his journal entry where he wrote: I must remain steadfast. If I falter, to whom will the students look for guidance in these magical halls? Hogwarts would certainly fall into a state of utter chaos if I were to abandon my post for even one day. Filch other than being a Squib which doesn't make his job easier, also hated the students. HL have flaws that frustrate me in terms of gameplay (a lot of it actually) but the design very much exceeded my book expectations. Devs have a lot to improve on and that's ok. We have something to look forward to. The 2009 game is great for its time. I know young me would've been obsessed
Because it's annoying as hell to wait for wait for them. The new game always has the physical stairs in place just that they visually appear in front of you like magic
The castle in the older game isn't too bad, from the outside moreso. It's just drab/dull. Also, I agree that while the newer game is remarkable, the castle does feel a bit too... posh sometimes.
Climbing the whole castle in Order of the Phoenix was what made that game the 🐐 for me. Idk if that was a feature of HBP but exploring in the 5th game was so fun
My favourite harry potter game (except hogwarts legacy) is Prisoner of Azkaban. Smooth controls and cute and fun graphics. HP 4, 5 games were fine too but controls were too hard to get used to because there was no mouse control option.
I wish there was a little more interaction with random students, like walking by and saying hello or even waving. Sometimes the Npc look more like look like walking mannequins with no personality. Other than the game is awesome
Howart's it's a failing school. After WWII and magic war, Howart's became a dangerous place, no father wants expose his sons and prefers that study something to generate money.
09 definitely can’t keep up with 23. 09 was great for its time, but let’s not push it lol. If 09 was released today, that shit would get torn apart by these reviews lmao.
Wish they had added Quidditch, a more interactive world where you can talk to students and different people, added Goblet of fire games, some amount of parkour-ish gameplay,
Never played any of the old Harry Potter games because I assumed it was trash like all the over licensed movie games, but wow, it looks like the half blood Prince team put alot of love into the project
Order of Phoenix as well actually it was that game that created this world half blood prince just built upon it. The games before order of Phoenix were quite different in every aspect. Order of Phoenix built this amazing hogwarts castle
@@siddarthbalakrishnan9657 it was nice to see the evolution of these games. i always compared them to the books. even the movies were spot on in almost every aspect. being a fan ofcourse i spotted some differences but they were so minor... it didnt even matter, it seems they really put a big effort into making them just as we imagined them
I wish the doors in Legacy actually had weight like they did in 2009. It's still so weird how the fattest door of the castle swings open like the cheapest, most decapitated trailer door you could find
Only thing that was wrong is that in HBP you're actually using wingardium leviosa, in HL youre using a different spell that's levioso. You do get wingardium leviosa later in the story.
He uses levioso at first when the purple beam shoots out. However when the yellow beam shouts out and he walks around with the barrel, that's wingardium leviosa. Both are in Hogwarts Legacy
Honestly, graphics really have gotten that much better in 14 years. Understandable though, you can only get so much better when it's been realistic for years now. You can only improve perfection so much
“Back in my day, we could haras as many children as we wanted!” -me, who would hit students with stone benches, upset that you couldn’t fight the students-
Edited to clarify: The only better thing in the 2009 game is the fact that the Great Hall is bigger. It's much longer with more seats, which is more realistic because there are a lot of students studying at Hogwarts (Years 1 to Years 7). Obviously the graphics in Hogwarts Legacy are better.
Surely you cant be serious? The 2009 Great Hall looks like a hallway, with tables stuffed in. Narrow looking, and not great at all. Hogwarts Legacy made it look like a Great Hall.
Despite the fact that the Half-Blood Prince and the Order of the Phoenix are my favorite parts, I have something to praise the Hogwarts legacy for. it is more open, variable, and rpg-like. In Harry Potter, the emphasis is still on Harry Potter and his story. Hogwarts was created based on the film and Jowling 's developments
In Half Blood Prince you don’t have the. Levioso spell you have leviosa, but in the clip at 1:32 he uses Levioso just makes thing levitate in place and you can pull it with accio. You do Unlock Leviosa later though and you can move it around with that spell in all directions. In the Half Blood Prince you only have leviosa. I just thought some people would want to know in case they were confused as to why one says its not “levioso its leviosa”.
I loved the Order of the Phoenix Harry Potter game. I wish Hogwarts Legacy took after that and the movies more with the construction of certain areas. I mean, how did we not get the moving grand staircase? Also I felt like the older games were a bit more free and sandboxy in comparison. You could destroy and repair random things, you could levitate and throw objects at people or a stack them to get to particular locations, and you could start fights with any student(s) that you wanted. It just felt more interactive overall. I also liked the shortcut doorways that you had to unlock one way or another. With that said, I still prefer Hogwarts Legacy, but I really wish they added more sandbox elements and stayed closer to the films design wise. I mean, I can freeze any object with fire and nothing will happen (except for one specific interaction, in which you can't even light it back on fire afterwards). Hopefully they can make a more sandboxy and immersive game in the next one. Though I am excited for whatever DLC they have coming along currently.
you forgot to show that you actually make the potions in the old game as a mini game instead of just having the ingredients and get them automatically made in Hogwarts legacy
I love how some areas were clearly inspired by it’s predecessor/movie counterpart like the potions classroom being almost exactly the same This hogwarts is a combination of the familiarity of the movies castle combines with some great creative liberties and more true to source material in the book
Certain things about the harry potter game seem more magical than the Hogwarts game; like how they cast the spells (Lumos) and how the stairs move, even how they fly on a broom seems way better than the hogwarts legacy gameplay. The harry potter game is older but they kept what I admire about magic in those movies.
@@samuraibruga9177 I actually don’t know much about the other Harry Potter games, I’ve only seen some short gameplay videos. Comparing The two always reminds me of Grandtheft auto San Andreas versus Grandtheft auto 5. The first one was massive but lacked a lot of details that the future games had, and Grandtheft auto five was the most detailed although it just didn’t seem as fun and free is the first one.
@Clem F no, it's totally different. Flying on a broomstick shouldn't be easy, and in HP games it seemed to be something simple, very hard. just go through the hoops without moving too much. Hogwarts Legacy shows the complexity and precision needed to fly
@Clem F I just watched the clips over and I'm pretty sure in the Hogwartz Legacy gameplay the broom is flying at its top speed lol. I've watched most of the gameplay of H.L. and saw the lessons they took on the broom etc. as well. Comparing thoee 2 clips though, the Harry potter game looks so much better (more magical) because when the camera pans as harry turns back into the ring, you get an affect feeling as if you're actually flying and cutting a sharp turn. Youre trying to keep up with the stich just like in the movie, although I do agree it may be too easy for the controls as this other commenter said. Whereas on the Hogwartz game, I really don't like how the camera angle is controlled. I haven't played it but I'm assuming it's manually controlled by the joystick. Both games are doing the exact same thing and even though the graphics aren't the same at all, the harry potter game just looks better and embodies the feeling of flying better.
Os antigos são mais fiéis aos filmes, embora eu prefira o mapa de Hogwarts Legacy, o detalhe que mais chamou atenção pra mim foi a mudança das escadarias.
Na verdade se passa em um tempo bem antigo ao atual de Harry Potter, provável que mudarão e adaptarão filelmente ao atualconforme as mudanças no tempo.
@@theshenkz eu acredito que a maioria gostaria de vê as escadas do filmes, em alto nível, eu gostava dela já nos jogos anteriores, nessa geração iria ficar top, eu pelo menos... n curti
@@fernandodimi Além de as escadas do HL serem fiéis aos livros, também tem a questão de que HL se passa mais de 150 anos antes de Harry Potter. Dá pra pensar que várias coisas não são iguais porquê as coisas são antigas e vão mudando com o tempo.
Neither of these two Grand Staircase designs are "more accurate" to the books because the books don't even have a Grand Staircase. The books only mention the castle having 142 different staircases but never an area or tower with a huge staircase inside
@@AdiiS To be fair the staircases in the books have their own quirks (like some have disappearing steps and others lead to different places every other day), so yeah they're still "magical" but there's just nott one area with a lot of staircases like the Grand Staircase
Doesn't matter. Even in the movies Hogwarts Layout changed like 4-5 times (removed Towers/Building, added new one, moved them somewhere else). Of course it's easier to be more accurate for game based on an specific movie. They did a great job in Hogwarts Legacy
the fact that the non-harry potter character sounds more like Daniel Radcliff than the character who IS Daniel Radcliff is hilarious. I kinda wish they had made the guy voice not just Harry's exact voice, intonation, cadence etc, sorta took me out of the whole "this is before Harry's time" but thats my only big gripe really
More like two games based on different things: Hogwarts Legacy is based on the books, and the other HP games are based on the movies. Both concepts are good though.
@@Bio452 90% not at all. The entire outside and the majority of the inside all tie up with the film locations. 90% based on the books is utter nonsense.
@@obiwankenobi687 Not at all! A lot of things are different and based on the books. The only areas that are inspired (but not the same) to the movies are really a short list.
@@Bio452 the entire outside of the castle is modeled on the films. It’s an 1800’s version of the movie hogwarts model. Different architecture here and there but based on the films. Same with the location of the headmasters office, grand staircase, great hall, gamekeeper hut, potions classroom, owlery, tapestry room, potions masters storage room, greenhouses, transfiguration classroom, clocktower, bridge, astronomy tower, astronomy courtyard, they all match their locations in the film on the hogwarts model. You could point to different locations on the movie hogwarts model and they all line up to what’s presented to us in the game. Then the ghost designs, based off the film versions, fat lady portrait design, common room designs, hogsmeade station design, hogwarts express design, creature design, bathroom designs etc. they’re all inspired by the films. Even the location of the copse of trees in the lake behind the great hall. There are obviously a number of interiors and locations and Easter eggs from the books as well to compliment it, a real blend of the two mediums. But to suggest it’s 90% based off the books is just not right. 50% of hogwarts is the exterior and the other 50% the interior and the exterior is practically the film model so you’re at 50% movie inspiration already. Then most of the classrooms being the same design as the films bumps it up even more. It’s a good 70% film to 30% book blend as you walk around. And that’s before you get onto the room of requirement, creature designs and hogsmeade station. I don’t get how anyone could pretend it isn’t. Maybe you like the books more than the films and that’s 100% fine but let’s not start pretending it’s not majorly based on the films. At a real stretch you could just sit in the middle and say it’s 50/50 book/film. But 90% book? 10% film? Lol absolutely not.
One small little detail I wish they would have included in hogwarts legacy is; I wish the paintings were asleep at night like they are in the movies. They're always awake lol
Well, Student is always awake too
In fact, they are asleep at night. If you stop casting Revelio every 5 seconds, of course.
It's because they're a gif lol
They do sleep at night
They do sleep at night. At least in the head masters room
I like in the old game how the stairs move like the movies its a little more immersive because of the familiarity.
The staircase is book accurate.
@@Makapend yeah, not as cool though
@@robtennant98 what are you talking about hogwarts legacy’s staircase is better than the movies😂
@@Sadwilly nah movie is more creative and iconic
@@mattrb8101 no lmao,This is just nostalgia speaking louder
Love the detailing and physics in Legacy, but still gotta appreciate what they were able to pull off in the early and late 2000s, given the crappy budget and limited HW capability. My favourite of the franchise used to be the Chamber of Secrets in 2002. The environment was immersive and haunting.
Are you talking about Chamber of Secrets on PC or PS2 ? Because they're radically different games, but both very charming.
@@yrooxrksvi7142 PS2, I’d hasten to guess. It helps that the composer for the soundtrack was none other than Jeremy Soule, who also scored Oblivion.
@@Tsrashi CoS PS2 has to be my favorite HP game (until I get my hands on HL, naturally). And speaking of Jeremy Soule, I'd love to see a soundtrack replacement mod where they use his music and James Hannigan's from Order of The Phoenix onwards.
"late 2000s' bruh it aint 2090, its 2023, we still in the early 2000s.
liked prisoner of azkaban more, cuz of the hogwarts exploring
One thing I’ll add as an avid book reader. I noticed that a lot of features in Hogwarts legacy are based of descriptions from the book rather than how it shows up in the movie. A lot of the exterior is similar to the movies but inside seems more based on the book description. Two easy examples is the Grand Stair Case in Hogwarts Legacy is more based on how the book describes the area rather than what’s shown in the movie. The second example is the location of the Common room entrance. The movie shows the entrance to be in the area of the grand staircase but in the book it describes the entrance being close to the staircase but down its own hall way as we see in Hogwarts Legacy. I love both versions but can definitely appreciate the attention given from the books honestly
Also the house points structure!
They did say they were basing the game more on the books than the movies, with just enough of the movies/music thrown in
Movies are for gheys
I was nerding out ...
- the honeydukes shortcut behind the Witch statue.
- entering the kitchens by tickling the pear on the portrait
So many direct references from the books I teared up and I haven't read the books in ages I'll be honest but instant whiplash.
Also de prefects bathroom is exactly as the description in the books, absolutely amazing. (is it called in english like that?sry)
One thing i remember from the order of the phoenix game is that you could attack any random student and they would duel you.
It was so disappointing to find out that in legacy the students wouldn't even react at all if you are casting spells at them.
i mean they kinda do they kinda jerk backwards sometimes
@@Annathebelle123 yeah okay, but their conversation continues like nothing happened.
you could Avada Kedavra someone and nobody could care in Legacy
Cause it was made by noob cash grab
@@claymorexx the fuck do you mean cash grab? Hogwarts legacy is in no way a cash grab. It has LITERALLY only one thing you can buy in game with real money which is the dark arts pack and you can totally not buy it.
I'm actually impressed with the 2009 version's graphics. It's been more than a decade and it's not bad at all.
Atmosphere of The Half Blood Prince >>>>
It's terrible.
@GeorgeMonet
You got any idea what games in the 2000s look like? In comparison to the others, this is awesome
@@Freyia_xo All the games i can think from that year (or before) looked lightyears better than this. Killzone 2, MGS4, Uncharted 2, Resident Evil 5, L4D2, Batman Arkham Asylum, Battlefield Bad Company (which also introduced destructible enviroments to that series), Gears of War 1 & 2... even going back to 2007 you got stuff like Halo 3, BioShock, COD4 (i'd mention Crysis but pretty much nothing could compete with that game until the next generation).
I'm surprised just how many likes that original comment has, honestly, either people are remembering wrong or they never experienced the PS3-X360 era.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I think they should remake the old ones with modern graphics and combat style. It would be really good to play the story from books and movies.
Modern graphic Yes, maybe some quality of life improvements definitely, but a remaster rather than a remake is what I'd love. I'm having heavy nostalgia for PS2 Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. I'd love a remaster if that gem and the PS2 Chamber of secrets
@@SaintJimmy379you want to pay full price for a game released 2 decades ago? 💀 remake >>> remaster
@@justinluna6668 Call of Duty creators: first time?
i think we shouldnt let them temper anymore with that story better to move forward instead of backward we know how it goes with the remasters...
Why changing the combat style? The analog thing was cool to me. It feels like having a REAL wand in your hand, I wish the Switch version had remote commands, what a shame 😔
I’m shocked at how good the old game was! I never played it so I would have expected worse.
especially the flying broom!
Also the old games are back 2 console generations on the ps3 and ps2 😅
The Harry potter games were very good, it is bad thats there is no more of them to buy 😢 I had but they CD crashed
They were rated pretty harshly back in the day by reviewers. However myself and many others enjoyed these games and I think overtime they're considered great games. I'd go as far as to say some of the best of the PS2 era. Definitely worth checking out even today.
@@luanamendes1710 U can always play on Ps2 emu btw..
What Half-Blood Prince did definitely better is the potion making. It's also nice that you can play Gobstone with others.
Another nice thing in my opinion was the manual spell casting. You actually had to make specific mouse movements to cast spells and had to remember the movements.
I wish this was at least an option in legacy
@@alex786 they could have made combos for controler gameplay too instead of having 4 spells sloted and then changing them. I think it would have actually improved fighting.
Half blood prince potion making was the biggest part i miss. Now You just select the potion and it makes it for you. But in half blood prince it was so entertaining to make all these potions. Trying to make the perfect potion.
But deek thinks you should be proud with all potions you've brewed
@@kakemi9 i loved order of the Phoenix it was so fun
I like how the old games make hogwarts feel creepy with the grey lighting instead of it almost always being lighter and more alive in legacy
Cuz in the old games voldemort was alive, in Legacy nope
It was around Wizarding War times lol
For me, this has always been weird. Hogwarts is rarely described as scary, but rather as a warm and welcoming, yet confusing magical place.
Its accurate to the tone of Half Blood Prince since it was also the year the Ministry formally announced that the Second Wizarding War is on going.
The first two games are really vibrant
Another important detail in old Harry Potter games was how long they had to make them, they needed to release them quickly after each movie so they didn't have like 4-6 years that games like Hogwarts Legacy and others have. Just one to two years and after release instantly you need to start working on the other.
exactly, completetly agree with you.
Though some of the old games reused a lot of things from previous games. Ps2 Sorcerer's Stone and Chamber of Secrets had basically the same castle. Also Order of the Phoenix and Half Blood Prince were very similar. The biggest difference can be seen between Prisoner of Azkaban and Order the Phoenix and inbetween those they had that rushed dumbsterfire of Goblet of Fire. Also the games were a lot shorter in terms of story and world. Not saying smaller size is automatically a bad thing but it definitely affects the time needed for development.
That my friend is why movie tie-in games barely exist nowadays, it was a dumb practice made only for advertising
Correction: BEFORE each movie so they could launch in time.
@officialkirbyfan6899 i think the last time it truly worked was the Revenge of the Sith game
For me, the best game in the harry potter saga is "the order of the phoenix". the mechanics of using spells were really cool
Yeah that game was so awesome!
The in-game map was like the marauder's map.
And you could just attack any random student and they would duel you, i loved that detail.
In legacy the students don't even react if you're shooting spells right at them.
Half-blood prince works the same but it’s way less boring.
Yes daddy!
Somehow the male character in Hogwarts Legacy sounds more like Harry Potter than Harry Potter.
Don't trust that bot
@@LiteFightr let’s mass report it
true
@@LiteFightris not a bot bro stop the cap
why am i agreeing with this guy
This really makes me appreciate the range of color we get in more modern games too
Yes PS3's era was the dark age of desaturated crap
It has its charm though, makes me nostalgia seeing it.
@@phaexalI dont know what are you talking about i play a lot ps3 games and everything look colorful and crisp maybe is your tv.
In this case, sure, but in many, if not most modern games, the warm coloring and overly realistic environments - are pretty boring, overused and make locations seem less creative/artistic, more similar to one another.
Also, artists often can't pull out details without making your eyes having a hard time to focus on one particular thing with all the "Visual noise" you see on the screen.
Which is why the older, more outdated technology actually made games look better, in a way, because game developers had limited space and resources which's forced them to only show you what they really wanted to show you, without all the extra unnecessary foliage, rocks, etc. - which often is just copy pasted and pretty randomly spread across the ground.
This is also why Open World games are so boring to look at / explore, for the most part.
Very strange but I felt more life in the npcs of the old games, it seemed that they were really seeing me. In Legacy sometimes it seems like they don't notice you.
Cos you’re harry potter! Thats why u are public attention
@@dikaduha6891 You're also supposed to be public attention in Hogwarts Legacy too with how you attended Hogwarts on the fift year and joined the ceremony late. You have dialogues about you everytime you see other students and all.
The NPCs acted very erratically during cutscenes in legacy, sometimes they would walk back and forth when the camera switched focus 🙄lmfao they would look like they were obviously eavesdropping LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Yeah they mostly look at you and curse at you mostly Slytherins for ex "Potty Potter" and "Mudblood when Hermione is with you"
And so many things. Best thing you can beat every student up anytime
Aren't you a new student in legacy? I don't think much people would pay attention to a new person unless they make the effort.
We have to remember that hogwarts legacy takes place 100 years before Harry, and in the books, the castle seems to be somewhat sentient, so the castle will and can somewhat change how it looks, if I remember the 7th book correctly the castle literally helps rebuild its self
No, it's not because of that, Hogwarts didn't change Its appearance. It's just the devopers of the game based their Hogwarts on its depiction from the books rather than films. So Hogwarts Legacy is just closer to the canon
@@thedamntrain this^^
In my headcanon Hogwarts can change its appearance and size depending on how many students attend Hogwarts. For example the common rooms and great hall can get bigger or smaller.
@@hansyolo9649 Makes sense
@@thedamntrain I agree
While the 2009 one focuses much more on the fidelity of the films (not that it is more faithful than the hogwarts legacy) but I feel that it brings a more "faithful" feeling, the Hogwarts legacy brings a more glamorous and detailed hogwarts, while in the films it is very "finished" and very old
That's my feeling towards Hogwarts Legacy too compared to the movies. Hogwarts doesn't have the ambience and look of an ancient 1000 year old castle. It leans way too much on the glamorous side.
My thought is because Hogwarts Legacy's timeline is different. It's way way back before Harry Potter which may be the reason why the castle is not that worn out yet. I read somewhere that the game's timeline took place around the 1890s, that's about a century before the events in the Harry Potter books and films. The first wizarding war hasn't taken place yet.
@@tinbear1121 the game is based on the books, not movies, just that.
@@mmalhao06 Being a Christian (the follower of Christ):
- calls upon the name of THE LORD: Psalms 145:18 ,
Psalms 55:16 ,
Isaiah 55:6
- coming to repentance,
Luke 5:32
- going through new birth (baptized by the SPIRIT and by the water), 1 Corinthians 12:13 , John 3:7
- coming out from Babylon (the city life), Revelation 18:4
- flees from fornication: 1 Corinthians 6:18 ,
1 Thessalonians 4:3
- analysing their own life and life in general, 2 Corinthians 13:5
- have their Inner mans eyes and ears open: Mark 8:18 , 2 Chronicles 7:15 , Matthew 13:16
- Judges - judges - judges, themselves and life in general in: John 7:24
- seeks out 1st the KINGDOM OF GOD: Matthew 6:33
- have no worries nor thoughts about what they shall eat or wear: Matthew 6:31 ,
Luke 12:22 ,
Matthew 6:25 ,
Luke 12:29
- is not a friend with the world, but exposes the wicked: Ephesians 5:11 , Psalms 26:5 , James 4:4
- goes through the persecution: Luke 6:22 , Matthew 5:44 ,John 15:18 , 1 John 3:13
- has outworldly peace: John 14:27
- fears not any man, but has the sobering fear of GOD in him: Matthew 10:28 , 1 John 4:18
- rightly dividing the word of truth: 2 Timothy 2:15
- is both, the believer of the word and the doer of it also:
James 1:23 ,
Matthew 7:21
- have no idols not graven images: Isaiah 42:17 , Micah 5:13 , Isaiah 42:8 ,
Deuteronomy 7:5 ,
Habakkuk 2:18
Psalms 78:58
- worship GOD in SPIRIT AND IN TRUTH:
John 4:24
- are peacemakers: Matthew 5:9, Hebrews 12:14 ,
Romans 12:18
- are sober minded: 1 Peter 1:13 , Titus 2:6 , Titus 2:2 , 1 Peter 4:7 ,
1 Peter 5:8
@@tinbear1121 and, according to your beautiful logic, a thousand-year-old castle is brand new, and after some hundred years it has grown old It stood new for a thousand years, and sharply dilapidated in a hundred years.
Those old Potter games were IT. Such nostalgia. Thanks for this!
昔のゲームも普通に綺麗じゃん
It’s surprising graphically how well the old games hold up, I adore HL as it really does feel like a huge open world. And the fact you can walk or fly miles from the castle and land pretty much every where and explore and do side quests makes it so immersive. I’m playing HL for the first time and it’s up in my top 5 all time favourite games. The detail is just incredible and I’m so grateful we got to play it .
I preferred the staircase as it is in Half Blood Prince 'cause it's like I saw in movies
But the staircases in Hogwarts legacy are based off the book
@@ConsumptiveSoul they don't. On the books they changed directions. The Legacy ones can't have that option being designed in a different way
@@morannonnorstund254 well yeah it be harder to do
@@morannonnorstund254 why cant have that option?
@@morannonnorstund254 No thats not true. In the books they are NOT constantly moving. It is just mentioned, that they can lead on i.e. Friday somewhere else than on Thursday (but also only some staircases).
They did a wonderful job with the spells, I really felt like I had a wand in order of the phoenix and half-blood prince
Same. Felt so good to just throw a bench at other students.
Honestly, the old game doesn't look all to bad!👍🏻😍
the harry potter game had wayy better flying physics
@@UncleLumbago0 I think they are equal, just different styles.
The Harry Potter games have assists in sharp turns and rotate the camera automatically so that’s why is easier but not better, in Hogwarts Legacy you control every single movement and camera angle
They need to make a quidditch game again last they made was on the original Xbox 🙄
@@Arachnophobia20 Wow that's a long time😂
But I think a pure Quidditch game wouldn't meet today's expectitions, I think it will akways be integrated into another, bigger game.
昔の方の、完成度が思ってたよりも高くて驚いた
For those who say that Half-Blood Prince feels weird at times, that's because they recycled everything that was done in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, they only added a couple of areas and the history of the Half-Blood Prince, but the rest being the map, the spells, the animations, the combat system all comes from Order of the Phoenix.
Несогласен они заявляли создали по фильму больше !!!
The combat felt much more responsive in HBP and the character models looked better too.
@@Night_frost It’s because it’s been refined from the previous game. It’s a normal thing for studios to do. Except in normal video game titles they tend to have the budget/expectation to increase graphics quality. Which almost never happens for movie tie in games.
@@Night_frost wasn't HBP utter shit, extremely buggy and nearly all about it was just collecting stuff? I have the first 5 games and I remember that I didn't get the 6th because it was supposed to be pretty bad and very buggy too or having stuff coded in a way that makes small "mistakes" made by the player very punishing.
@@LunnarisLP Wasn’t buggy IIRC. It does have a lot to collect though (but not much more than OOTP).
Two distinctions I can remember is that ‘accio’ is pronounced differently in earlier games (like ‘axe-io’) and potions brewing in THBP was a lot more fun as a mini game, even if it was hard to brew amortentia
The map from the Half-Blood Prince is very accurate to the movies. Hogwarts Legacy has changed a lot, which is understandable and fine, but the Half-Blood Prince map is, from what I can see, almost a complete recreation of the sets in the movies, which I really appreciated back in the day and is why I enjoyed it so much
Edit: This is not a critique of Hogwarts Legacy or the books. I Just simply explained why I loved the old game
the time in hogwart legacy was a long time before the movie
@@tienhoang5918 It's the same Hogwarts. I mean that the structure itself is very accurate to the film
They mixed the book and the movie version of Hogwarts together thats why its a little different
@@jennys4562 It’s the same Hogwarts but the game takes place in the 1800s. Just like schools in real life, they can be renovated in the future.
@@__mindflayer__ Yes, but the main structure is different. It wasn't a critique, I just pointed out why I liked the HBP game so much
i like the subtle changes because of legacy being set in the 1800’s
Maybe there's something wrong with me but I miss the old one's dark athmosphere
I got really tired of the bleakness after seeing it in so many movies (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 part 1 and 7 part 2)
Too depressive considering it's supposed to be a world of magic
@@JishinimaTidehoshiit ws supposed to be darker because Voldemort returned
You miss the bleak dark atmosphere. Ok buddy
I miss it too. I was expecting Hogwarts Legacy to look like Prisoner of Azkaban movie in termd of atmosphere. But instead it feels too bright and colorful, almost like a Sims game.
@@HULK-HOGAN1i miss it cause i played it as a kid. I didnt really think of it as bleak and dark just magical and kinda creepy at times but really really cool like how a kid would lol
2:44 why does Harry run like that lmao
That's because Harry's model was just made bigger, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince recycles everything that was done in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, just added a couple of areas, the history of the Half- Blood Prince and practically nothing else, the spells, the animations all come from Order of the Phoenix
He thinks he's in Bully
HBP is supposed to resemble the movie version of the castle, while Legacy took some inspiration from the movies but added in elements from the book.
you compared Levioso from Hogwards Legacy with Wingardium Leviosa from Harry Potter, but later in game (Hogwards Legacy) you unlock Wingardium Leviosa, witch is more advanced than Levioso
I do miss moving the joystick in specific ways to cast spells in the old game; instead of just hitting a button
Half Blood Prince still looks pretty nice, but in terms of gameplay, it was just a shallow walking simulator throwing fetch quest after fetch quest to distract the player. The first 3 HP games, particularly the PS2 versions, while taking some liberties in how they depicted Hogwarts, were much more in line with Hogwarts Legacy's scope. Even Order of the Phoenix, while sharing the same core gameplay as HBP, had more interesting minigames.
Shallow gameplay and fetch quests? Sounds like Hogwarts Legacy. The game is nothing more than a pretty movie-set.
@@amysteriousviewer3772 If you put HBP on the same boat as Legacy, you obviously never played either. Hogwarts Legacy has actual dungeons, hordes of enemies, actual combos, puzzles to solve, harvesting potion ingredients, stealth. HBP just makes you walk around the castle and do the same 3 things : potions, broken duels, on-rail Quidditch.
You're obviously talking aimlessly here.
@@yrooxrksvi7142 I didn't put them on the same level I said that Hogwarts Legacy has shallow gameplay and fetch quests because it does. It has all those things you listed but none of them have any depth. It's a well designed world with barley anything worthwhile to do in it. Dungeons are short, Puzzles are repetitive and dead simple, collectibles are boring, combat is spamming the same 4 spells (yellow, purple, red + basic cast) over and over, brewing potions is literally just a menu, stealth is overpowered because the AI is so braindead. And the worst thing is that the only reward for doing anything is boring loot with arbitrary stats that don't have any tangible impact on gameplay.
@@amysteriousviewer3772 I disagree on the dungeons length, some may be shorter than others, but overall they last enough. Puzzles being repetitive is nothing new to Harry Potter games, I do wish there were more collectibles than money loot, clothes and guide pages though. As for combat, I have some gripes with how some spells have been handled : I don't like Stupefy being tied ONLY to counters and Petrificus Totalus strictly to stealth, as Glacius and Arresto Momentum feel like weaker versions that could have been used a bit more for interacting with the enviroment than just combat.
I agree. I remember playing the first few harry potter games and loving them. But then they stopped making it open world, the scope was diminished, so I stopped buying them.
I'm not gonna lie, I'd prefer having to wait for the grand staircase instead of it just appearing when you need it. I also like its square and angular design more than the spiral staircase in Hogwarts legacy.
it should be angular like in the movies. That spiral staircase doesnt feel hogwartsy
@@mikkihintikka7273 well the staircase is based off the books rather the movie a lot was taken from the books over the movie and I prefer that
@@plaxxle130 thanks
I would like to be able to fall down also instead of invisible walls -_-
@@plaxxle130 I don't recall the books saying the staircase is spiral. Not a fan of the spiral version either.
Y'all remember when Harry drank the potion in Half-Blood Prince and became extremely confident?
Called cocaine in the muggle world
@@Sausagerills 😎👌
Felix Felicis potion
@@AvirajMahadik115 YEESSSS, THAT'S RIGHT
@@danilkronkin9465 everybody knows
Stop crying
I played both OotP and HBP on Wii and they were absolutely great games! The side-to-side comparison here makes it look quite harsh, but Hogwarts was just as big than in HL, without all the loading between towers. I actually preferred Hogwarts' map in the Wii games, it had more locations from the movies and made a bit more sense to me. The entire Defence Against the Dark Arts Tower with the baroque style and music is a weird addition in my opinion. I'm wondering where that concept came from...
Lack of interactions with students at Hogwarts Legacy. The world feels dead... and that makes me sad. There are no mini-games, no duels with anyone. Of course, the detail and world are impressive, but for me it could have been better, we are waiting for a DLC or something. If I were the developers, I would add a co-op mode. To play with friends)
The problem is that there is nothing to play with friends) So you go in, and then what? Merlin's tasks?😂😂😂
vergleich zwischen 2009 und 2023. toller vergleich
The old game looks more accurate to the movie but I appreciate the massive amounts of space and details put in the Hogwarts legacy.
legacy is based on the books
Well, it also may be cuz the story is set a century earlier than the films so who knows, they may have done renovations or changed things in a hundred years.
I've only played HL and I love that the castle isn't dark all throughout (except for places not usually explored by students) In daytime, it has a warmer feeling and feels very student appropriate as it gets. But come night time, it definitely feels eerie. I also should note that this Hogwarts is from an earlier timeline, a century before Harry's or even Dumbledore's time. So the castle is understandably in good condition. The Wizarding War first occurred in the 19th century which would explain why the Hogwarts we know is not as "glamorous" as it used to be. Also, Filch is a terrible caretaker compared to Gladwin Moon. See his journal entry where he wrote: I must remain steadfast. If I falter, to whom will the students look for guidance in these magical halls? Hogwarts would certainly fall into a state of utter chaos if I were to abandon my post for even one day. Filch other than being a Squib which doesn't make his job easier, also hated the students.
HL have flaws that frustrate me in terms of gameplay (a lot of it actually) but the design very much exceeded my book expectations. Devs have a lot to improve on and that's ok. We have something to look forward to. The 2009 game is great for its time. I know young me would've been obsessed
0:35 why didn’t they do those stairs in the newest game?
Because it's annoying as hell to wait for wait for them.
The new game always has the physical stairs in place just that they visually appear in front of you like magic
who tf uses these stairs in 2024 lol 😂
It's more accurate to the book in hogwarts legacy
Books
@@inflames1004 wait there's more books than harry potter and the magical stone?
The castle in the older game isn't too bad, from the outside moreso. It's just drab/dull. Also, I agree that while the newer game is remarkable, the castle does feel a bit too... posh sometimes.
Posh and ever so slightly pretentious
Man the Herbology dept seen some huge budget cuts in the past 100 years.
Climbing the whole castle in Order of the Phoenix was what made that game the 🐐 for me. Idk if that was a feature of HBP but exploring in the 5th game was so fun
My favourite harry potter game (except hogwarts legacy) is Prisoner of Azkaban. Smooth controls and cute and fun graphics. HP 4, 5 games were fine too but controls were too hard to get used to because there was no mouse control option.
HP 4 is trash
"Cute and fun" tf is cute and fun in graphics lmao
such a classic 2 me
@@user-ky1zg2rw6k 👍
@@CITYZEN50 yeah gotta agree with the others, you haven't played it i assume, because that's exactly how i would describe it as well hah
I wish there was a little more interaction with random students, like walking by and saying hello or even waving. Sometimes the Npc look more like look like walking mannequins with no personality. Other than the game is awesome
Half blood game was great, the details of the castle and how similar it is to the castle in movie
Both are in a league of their own. 2009 can definitely keep up with 2023, even on some of the newer open world games
Howart's it's a failing school. After WWII and magic war, Howart's became a dangerous place, no father wants expose his sons and prefers that study something to generate money.
@@hatoriddr Are you referencing your own fan fiction? I have no idea wth you’re talking about 😂
@@10293 U caught me!
It can’t keep up man let it rest in peace. The colors are boring and monotone and it’s just a dated game in general
09 definitely can’t keep up with 23. 09 was great for its time, but let’s not push it lol. If 09 was released today, that shit would get torn apart by these reviews lmao.
Anybody else kinda wish they had kept the moving stairs like that?
BRUH WE SHOULD NOT FORGET THE OG HARRY POTTER IT GOT THAT OLD VIBE
Wish they had added Quidditch, a more interactive world where you can talk to students and different people, added Goblet of fire games, some amount of parkour-ish gameplay,
Never played any of the old Harry Potter games because I assumed it was trash like all the over licensed movie games, but wow, it looks like the half blood Prince team put alot of love into the project
Oh yeah no Half-Blood Prince was really fun to play
Half blood Prince and prisoner of azkaban are definitely worth playing.
read the books play them all they are nice
Order of Phoenix as well actually it was that game that created this world half blood prince just built upon it. The games before order of Phoenix were quite different in every aspect. Order of Phoenix built this amazing hogwarts castle
@@siddarthbalakrishnan9657 it was nice to see the evolution of these games. i always compared them to the books. even the movies were spot on in almost every aspect. being a fan ofcourse i spotted some differences but they were so minor... it didnt even matter, it seems they really put a big effort into making them just as we imagined them
I wish the doors in Legacy actually had weight like they did in 2009.
It's still so weird how the fattest door of the castle swings open like the cheapest, most decapitated trailer door you could find
The older one has a more Harry Potter vibe to it, kinda how it was in the movies.
Because it is based on the movies. I agree the new one looks too posh at times, but it is generally more accurate to the actual books.
Now every bug is a magic ✨
@official_GameBest259 💀
Only thing that was wrong is that in HBP you're actually using wingardium leviosa, in HL youre using a different spell that's levioso. You do get wingardium leviosa later in the story.
He uses levioso at first when the purple beam shoots out. However when the yellow beam shouts out and he walks around with the barrel, that's wingardium leviosa. Both are in Hogwarts Legacy
Honestly, graphics really have gotten that much better in 14 years. Understandable though, you can only get so much better when it's been realistic for years now. You can only improve perfection so much
“Back in my day, we could haras as many children as we wanted!”
-me, who would hit students with stone benches, upset that you couldn’t fight the students-
I like the old stairs mechanics better
That knight smashing the other one has to be the funniest ever
Edited to clarify: The only better thing in the 2009 game is the fact that the Great Hall is bigger. It's much longer with more seats, which is more realistic because there are a lot of students studying at Hogwarts (Years 1 to Years 7). Obviously the graphics in Hogwarts Legacy are better.
Year 7?
It's too narrow, the tables are too close to each other. And the roof and wall don't have a lot of details
Surely you cant be serious? The 2009 Great Hall looks like a hallway, with tables stuffed in. Narrow looking, and not great at all. Hogwarts Legacy made it look like a Great Hall.
@@vitor.com_acento Yeah I agree it looks better in Hogwarts Legacy (OBVIOUSLY) but it's too small.
@@KuroKaii991 Yes, Hogwarts students study there for 7 years...
half blood prince is like gta san andreas and
hogwarts legacy is like gta 5
Nah
Hp6 have better spell mechanics and haunted atmosphere, Hogwarts Legacy feels like a mmorpg with shiny glittering world
Despite the fact that the Half-Blood Prince and the Order of the Phoenix are my favorite parts, I have something to praise the Hogwarts legacy for.
it is more open, variable, and rpg-like.
In Harry Potter, the emphasis is still on Harry Potter and his story. Hogwarts was created based on the film and Jowling 's developments
The scale and realism of the Order of the Phoenix and Half-Blood Prince games were mind-blowing at the time, but _now_ look how far we've come.
In Half Blood Prince you don’t have the. Levioso spell you have leviosa, but in the clip at 1:32 he uses Levioso just makes thing levitate in place and you can pull it with accio. You do Unlock Leviosa later though and you can move it around with that spell in all directions.
In the Half Blood Prince you only have leviosa.
I just thought some people would want to know in case they were confused as to why one says its not “levioso its leviosa”.
I loved the Order of the Phoenix Harry Potter game. I wish Hogwarts Legacy took after that and the movies more with the construction of certain areas. I mean, how did we not get the moving grand staircase? Also I felt like the older games were a bit more free and sandboxy in comparison. You could destroy and repair random things, you could levitate and throw objects at people or a stack them to get to particular locations, and you could start fights with any student(s) that you wanted. It just felt more interactive overall. I also liked the shortcut doorways that you had to unlock one way or another. With that said, I still prefer Hogwarts Legacy, but I really wish they added more sandbox elements and stayed closer to the films design wise. I mean, I can freeze any object with fire and nothing will happen (except for one specific interaction, in which you can't even light it back on fire afterwards). Hopefully they can make a more sandboxy and immersive game in the next one. Though I am excited for whatever DLC they have coming along currently.
you forgot to show that you actually make the potions in the old game as a mini game instead of just having the ingredients and get them automatically made in Hogwarts legacy
1:24 "LOUGH-MOSS"
I love how some areas were clearly inspired by it’s predecessor/movie counterpart like the potions classroom being almost exactly the same
This hogwarts is a combination of the familiarity of the movies castle combines with some great creative liberties and more true to source material in the book
I am amazed the old game did hold up so well
It’s crazy to think how back in the day we thought those graphics were insanely good lol
Certain things about the harry potter game seem more magical than the Hogwarts game; like how they cast the spells (Lumos) and how the stairs move, even how they fly on a broom seems way better than the hogwarts legacy gameplay. The harry potter game is older but they kept what I admire about magic in those movies.
The npcs density in Phoenix game is waaaay higher. You can also talk and point wand to students. Hogwarts Legacy kinda gives me fanfic vibes
@@samuraibruga9177 I actually don’t know much about the other Harry Potter games, I’ve only seen some short gameplay videos. Comparing The two always reminds me of Grandtheft auto San Andreas versus Grandtheft auto 5. The first one was massive but lacked a lot of details that the future games had, and Grandtheft auto five was the most detailed although it just didn’t seem as fun and free is the first one.
@Clem F no, it's totally different. Flying on a broomstick shouldn't be easy, and in HP games it seemed to be something simple, very hard. just go through the hoops without moving too much. Hogwarts Legacy shows the complexity and precision needed to fly
@Clem F I just watched the clips over and I'm pretty sure in the Hogwartz Legacy gameplay the broom is flying at its top speed lol. I've watched most of the gameplay of H.L. and saw the lessons they took on the broom etc. as well. Comparing thoee 2 clips though, the Harry potter game looks so much better (more magical) because when the camera pans as harry turns back into the ring, you get an affect feeling as if you're actually flying and cutting a sharp turn. Youre trying to keep up with the stich just like in the movie, although I do agree it may be too easy for the controls as this other commenter said. Whereas on the Hogwartz game, I really don't like how the camera angle is controlled. I haven't played it but I'm assuming it's manually controlled by the joystick. Both games are doing the exact same thing and even though the graphics aren't the same at all, the harry potter game just looks better and embodies the feeling of flying better.
@Clem F Looks like he used the turbo briefly at the beginning in this video. You also fly faster when closer to the ground I heard.
Did you turn off the ambient music for Legacy?
It's so souless without any music
Man, running animation on harry potter half blood prince looks really ridicilous bruhv 😂
I liked the broom better in halfblood-prince, to be honest: it felt more zoomy with the wind and sound
broom flying looks pretty good for 2009
when I played the old game back then, it has the graphics of Hogwarts Legacy today.
that's how I see every game back then
Me pasa que los imagino así en súper calidad hasta que los vuelvo a ver hoy en día
Os antigos são mais fiéis aos filmes, embora eu prefira o mapa de Hogwarts Legacy, o detalhe que mais chamou atenção pra mim foi a mudança das escadarias.
Na verdade se passa em um tempo bem antigo ao atual de Harry Potter, provável que mudarão e adaptarão filelmente ao atualconforme as mudanças no tempo.
Escada do legacy nada a vê
É que a escadaria do legacy é fiel aos livros, as escadarias que se vê nos primeiros jogos é uma coisa dos filmes
@@theshenkz eu acredito que a maioria gostaria de vê as escadas do filmes, em alto nível, eu gostava dela já nos jogos anteriores, nessa geração iria ficar top, eu pelo menos... n curti
@@fernandodimi Além de as escadas do HL serem fiéis aos livros, também tem a questão de que HL se passa mais de 150 anos antes de Harry Potter. Dá pra pensar que várias coisas não são iguais porquê as coisas são antigas e vão mudando com o tempo.
It's LevioSA Aaangh~
Neither of these two Grand Staircase designs are "more accurate" to the books because the books don't even have a Grand Staircase. The books only mention the castle having 142 different staircases but never an area or tower with a huge staircase inside
wow so boring in the books then, glad I didn't invest my time in that
@@AdiiS To be fair the staircases in the books have their own quirks (like some have disappearing steps and others lead to different places every other day), so yeah they're still "magical" but there's just nott one area with a lot of staircases like the Grand Staircase
@@AdiiS Wow bro. You must be really important if moving staircases are your deal breaker.
@@AdiiS 💀💀💀🤡🤡🤡🤡
@@AdiiSWow so just stairs make a book boring for you. Rolls eyes- Charming indeed
The living armor who attacks his colleague just because he makes noise, it made me laugh 🤣
Locations of the old game are more similar with the movie
Doesn't matter. Even in the movies Hogwarts Layout changed like 4-5 times (removed Towers/Building, added new one, moved them somewhere else). Of course it's easier to be more accurate for game based on an specific movie.
They did a great job in Hogwarts Legacy
And? The new one is more accurate to the books
Наследие конечно классная современная игра.. но и кубок огня тоже любимая, так как старую игру тоже по своему любишь.
I prefer the Harry Potter Great hall since the Hogwarts Legacy feels like a shared food court
7:33 🤣🤣🔥🔥👍👍
the fact that the non-harry potter character sounds more like Daniel Radcliff than the character who IS Daniel Radcliff is hilarious. I kinda wish they had made the guy voice not just Harry's exact voice, intonation, cadence etc, sorta took me out of the whole "this is before Harry's time" but thats my only big gripe really
“Hey Harry” *continues to walk in lag*
No one gonna talk about the murder that happened at the end 🤣
Being able to fly everywhere is really a good mechanism in Hogwarts Legacy. Ive made 2 bandit camps gone by npc, while I haven't done anything 😂
新しいのは美しすぎて言葉にならないけど、古いヤツの方が映画の世界を忠実に再現している気がする🤔
今作は映画の舞台が設定じゃないだろ
@@あああいいい-h1n そんなことはわかってます。
@@不思議の国のアリス-j7j じゃあそこで比べる必要ないね
@@あああいいい-h1n 感想を言ったまでです。
映画の舞台が設定じゃないにしても、階段の仕組みとかは変わってるしやっぱり昔の方が再現度は高い気がする🤔
7:26 2009 Fire Phisics >>>
More like two games based on different things: Hogwarts Legacy is based on the books, and the other HP games are based on the movies. Both concepts are good though.
Well no, hogwarts legacy is based on the films and some details from the books, it’s a blend
@@obiwankenobi687 Nope, Hogwarts Legacy is 90% based on the books.
@@Bio452 90% not at all. The entire outside and the majority of the inside all tie up with the film locations. 90% based on the books is utter nonsense.
@@obiwankenobi687 Not at all! A lot of things are different and based on the books. The only areas that are inspired (but not the same) to the movies are really a short list.
@@Bio452 the entire outside of the castle is modeled on the films. It’s an 1800’s version of the movie hogwarts model. Different architecture here and there but based on the films. Same with the location of the headmasters office, grand staircase, great hall, gamekeeper hut, potions classroom, owlery, tapestry room, potions masters storage room, greenhouses, transfiguration classroom, clocktower, bridge, astronomy tower, astronomy courtyard, they all match their locations in the film on the hogwarts model.
You could point to different locations on the movie hogwarts model and they all line up to what’s presented to us in the game. Then the ghost designs, based off the film versions, fat lady portrait design, common room designs, hogsmeade station design, hogwarts express design, creature design, bathroom designs etc. they’re all inspired by the films. Even the location of the copse of trees in the lake behind the great hall.
There are obviously a number of interiors and locations and Easter eggs from the books as well to compliment it, a real blend of the two mediums. But to suggest it’s 90% based off the books is just not right. 50% of hogwarts is the exterior and the other 50% the interior and the exterior is practically the film model so you’re at 50% movie inspiration already. Then most of the classrooms being the same design as the films bumps it up even more. It’s a good 70% film to 30% book blend as you walk around. And that’s before you get onto the room of requirement, creature designs and hogsmeade station.
I don’t get how anyone could pretend it isn’t. Maybe you like the books more than the films and that’s 100% fine but let’s not start pretending it’s not majorly based on the films. At a real stretch you could just sit in the middle and say it’s 50/50 book/film. But 90% book? 10% film? Lol absolutely not.
Bro please u upload ur gameplay videos, definitely we love it ❤️
Wow! I love the comparison, both game are awesome.
I like how thick harry is in the old game. Now all the students are skinny twerps.
I loved playing Half-Blood Prince as a kid 😍
The amount of dedication they cast upon Hogwarts Legacy cannot be compared with any other HP game.
Legacy esta perfeito... Tou gostando muito... Zerei e estou tentando platinar ele...
Bist du Jude?