Sigma vs Sony | The Ultimate Ultra Wide Zoom Lens Comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @FocusCameraTV
    @FocusCameraTV  2 роки тому

    Let us know which lens you're thinking of below!

    • @piotreknuras
      @piotreknuras 2 роки тому

      I would rather go with Sony but in Poland price difference is even worse 1400 USD vs 900 USD. So Sigma is going to be probably my new choice

    • @KnightmareOX
      @KnightmareOX 2 роки тому +1

      Still a tough call. Leaning more towards the sony but unsure if I’ll find myself missing the f2.8

    • @seanhe4606
      @seanhe4606 2 роки тому

      @@KnightmareOX a prime lens like 24gm will do the low-light, then the other 90% cases Sony wins

  • @ArifKhan.
    @ArifKhan. 6 місяців тому

    I have the Sigma 28-70 F2.8 and was thinking of getting the Sigma 16-28 to complete a travel combo. But the Sony 16-35PZ + 85mm F1.8 might also be a very interesting travel combo - where the PZ can handle 85% of the work, and the 85mm could come in only for tele-photo portraits and some low light work. Still torn on which would be the better 2 lens travel combo.

  • @EuroRSN
    @EuroRSN 2 роки тому +4

    You missed the most important part. Optics and sharpness..

    • @davewerner7609
      @davewerner7609 Рік тому

      Can’t you get sharpness with Sigma if you open iris?

  • @Princeton_James
    @Princeton_James 2 роки тому +1

    The biggest advantage obviously is the 2.8 for the Sigma and the increased range for the Sony. I already have the big sony 2.8 and I wanted a smaller lens so I got the PZ. Im happy with the PZ.

  • @naturallymitch
    @naturallymitch Рік тому

    The comparison we all needed! Thanks dude. I think after spending WAY too much time researching, the Sony is the way to go for indoor photography/videography. In most situations, I'll have key lights, etc. to make sure the lighting is on point, and I will never need to go past 3200 ISO, so the 2.8 aperture on the Sigma kind of becomes irrelevant. If I want bokeh, then I use my 70-200 or a 1.8 prime. And.. of course...the sony range is much better and more versatile with the PZ and the ability to control it externally.

  • @RickMentore
    @RickMentore 2 роки тому

    You had me going with "shooting in Vermont." Fantastic review! Think I'll go with the Sigma, its budget friendly & I am familiar with Sigma's quality, I snoot their 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN | A &100-400MM F5-6.3 DG DN OS | C.

  • @pipidus
    @pipidus 2 роки тому

    thank you~ this is helpful to me!

  • @alhOOO2O
    @alhOOO2O 2 роки тому

    The ultra wide zooms are surely the 12-24mm variations

  • @edc641
    @edc641 2 роки тому +1

    Price difference in my country is 700$, making the sigma the obvious choice

  • @jayl24
    @jayl24 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the video! Have you seen any pronounced vignetting issue at 16 mm for this Sigma lens?

    • @FocusCameraTV
      @FocusCameraTV  2 роки тому +2

      From testing both lenses at all their focal lengths, (admittedly didn't do much pixel peeping), got to say I didn't notice any extreme vignette or too much warping with the Sigma.

  • @blackjohnny0
    @blackjohnny0 Рік тому

    Which Sony lens is it? Zeiss or this new one, PZ?

  • @richdandasan4843
    @richdandasan4843 2 роки тому

    Sony 16 - 35 looks good, and may be good pairing it with sony 1.8 G for asthro may be a good option. But the PZ on sony, i wonder about its longevity. I guess only time will tell. Sigma is a viable option too.