Really? I find him evasive and backward-looking. He talks like a politician and dwells on his company's glorious past. Anyway, Intel could turn around, but it would have to be gutted of stodgy lifers.
@@thequestingblade he's making many changes, at least they are trying to catch up. With the old one we were stucked. But all of them are like politicians.
Technical people look at thing the way it is, not in a biased way. However, the world, especially the business one, is complex, influenced by many other factors which are usually ridiculous but sometimes make sense. By now, we know that the top people, board of directors, do not agree with Pat 's vision and implementation. Pat could not stomach it and resigned. We will see what are coming up next for Intel.
I've been closely following Intel's developments and how Pat responds to some very tough questions lately. You've asked virtually every one of those difficult questions, and you've done an excellent job. Because we need to understand the real answers, the straightforward answers. Your interviews are very well done, and every question is one that most people are concerned about. Thank you very much for your show.
Intel is run by career workers who only care about their salary. They don't want to do new stuff. That is why they gave up GPU those days. Also their 5g modem wasnt successful so they sold it to apple.
@@ArpanKundu-k9xIntel was ran by people who only cared for revenue, but Pat has a different vision and that’s to create competitive products while bringing in revenue. He has made more progress in 3 years than his predecessor did in several years.
It seems the edge Intel is looking for is indeed at the edge, with neuromorphic processing marking a crucial piece of the puzzle. This places the partnership with BrainChip in a special position at the Foundry AI conference, highlighting its significance as the final component in this technological ensemble.
question related to gamers, all mobo manufacturers (Asus, Msi, gygabyte, asrock) are also located in taiwan, what if a war breaks out? no mobos for decades for gamers? beside chips?
All of this hinges on MacOS and Windows 12 putting these experiences together. Unfortunately for Intel’s stock price I’m not sure that happens right away. I trust apple to integrate LLMs into their stack and Siri (they’re doing it now, according to rumours) but I’m not sure Microsoft can compete. Windows ecosystem isn’t as tight as apple. You need to read my notes, read my emails, read everything…
Pat always seems to either not answer the question asked or misunderstand the question. Like he learned the art of speaking from politicians. He would be served by speaking more plainly and more to the point. He seems like an okay guy, but he is endlessly frustrating as a CEO of a company I am invested in.
Gelsinger said NVIDIA success is due to luck. So what, tsmc success is also due to luck. The difference is tsmc and NVIDIA can cash in from their luck, while Intel is still searching for its luck. 😂 If a company CEO depends on luck, I do not think he is cut out for the job. 😂
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Most interviewer avoid asking sharp and direct questions. Excellent job.
I've never liked intel, but patrick as a CEOs changed my mind. He's very honest and visionary.
Really? I find him evasive and backward-looking. He talks like a politician and dwells on his company's glorious past. Anyway, Intel could turn around, but it would have to be gutted of stodgy lifers.
@@thequestingblade he's making many changes, at least they are trying to catch up. With the old one we were stucked. But all of them are like politicians.
Technical people look at thing the way it is, not in a biased way. However, the world, especially the business one, is complex, influenced by many other factors which are usually ridiculous but sometimes make sense. By now, we know that the top people, board of directors, do not agree with Pat 's vision and implementation. Pat could not stomach it and resigned. We will see what are coming up next for Intel.
I've been closely following Intel's developments and how Pat responds to some very tough questions lately. You've asked virtually every one of those difficult questions, and you've done an excellent job. Because we need to understand the real answers, the straightforward answers. Your interviews are very well done, and every question is one that most people are concerned about. Thank you very much for your show.
At least intel finally led by an engineer that understands all these hardware and tech.. the foundry will be the growth in later part by 2025..
Brilliant interview. Thanks for this! Earned a sub
Awesome, welcome aboard!
Solid interview!
15:08 Well said, Pat.❤❤❤
Pat used to lead Intel's 1st GPGPU Larabee project in year 2005~2007.
Nobody cares now. Nvidia is light years ahead of Intel in GPU tech. Pat looks like a clown.
Intel is run by career workers who only care about their salary. They don't want to do new stuff. That is why they gave up GPU those days. Also their 5g modem wasnt successful so they sold it to apple.
@@ArpanKundu-k9xIntel was ran by people who only cared for revenue, but Pat has a different vision and that’s to create competitive products while bringing in revenue. He has made more progress in 3 years than his predecessor did in several years.
Pat please push for better Intel GPU drivers. The hardware is there it just needs fine tuning.
This guy is unbelievable.
Jensen: 2:30. 9:30. Why I want to have Intel making my chip?
I think a tariff could have worked better than/alongside the CHIPs act.
One of the most interesting interview that is still valid today and views are less than 8K shows that intel is a silent tiger
Very informative thank you
It seems the edge Intel is looking for is indeed at the edge, with neuromorphic processing marking a crucial piece of the puzzle. This places the partnership with BrainChip in a special position at the Foundry AI conference, highlighting its significance as the final component in this technological ensemble.
Yeah but that cycle is 15 years away.
question related to gamers, all mobo manufacturers (Asus, Msi, gygabyte, asrock) are also located in taiwan, what if a war breaks out? no mobos for decades for gamers? beside chips?
Motherboards are not proprietary. They can be just as easily made elsewhere. It’s just a PCB with multiple licenses.
I'd like to know why TSMC can build a fab in a year and Intel moves at snail's pace?
Regulations, taxes, cost, politics.
they are light years behind of AMD and Nvidia now
BriefCam - is the best
All of this hinges on MacOS and Windows 12 putting these experiences together. Unfortunately for Intel’s stock price I’m not sure that happens right away. I trust apple to integrate LLMs into their stack and Siri (they’re doing it now, according to rumours) but I’m not sure Microsoft can compete. Windows ecosystem isn’t as tight as apple. You need to read my notes, read my emails, read everything…
Microsoft is leading in the AI
Apple is going to use Intel's foundry. They compete each other
Foundry's low margin.
Gelsinger was an Intel computer hardware developer for a long time before he left Intel! He should of never accepted the Intel CEO, stay with VMWARE.
Pat always seems to either not answer the question asked or misunderstand the question. Like he learned the art of speaking from politicians. He would be served by speaking more plainly and more to the point. He seems like an okay guy, but he is endlessly frustrating as a CEO of a company I am invested in.
which question do you think he could understand or answer better? what would your follow-up questions be if you were interviewing him?
5N4Y
🤍🖤👌👌
Gelsinger said NVIDIA success is due to luck. So what, tsmc success is also due to luck. The difference is tsmc and NVIDIA can cash in from their luck, while Intel is still searching for its luck. 😂 If a company CEO depends on luck, I do not think he is cut out for the job. 😂