this is pretty scary honestly, i can imagine someone lighting a whole building on fire and they couldnt see it earlier because the place was doused with hand sanitizer instead of like oil🗿 note: please dont use my idea
The drawing can be big, the faucet just shoots the water out too fast, so the force of the water moving literally tears the drawing apart. If you let the water fill slower, you can get the whole thing to float
I remember back in 8th grade, my teacher put our test papers in front of his windshield and mine was bathed in direct sunlight. I failed that test because "I didn't answer the front page", thankfully it wasn't a very important one
@@dakotahernandez9511 No, most people know that lemon juice is what is used to reveal hidden text. It’s in kids cartoons shows. But I appreciate the statistic you pulled out of your ass.
I have a story about the erasable pen... When I was a kid I used to write my homework with that type of pen but during the winter I usually stay more in front of the pellet stove and put my book and notebooks on it... I didn't know that the pen ink cancel with the heat so I was surprised when I come back after the afternoon snack finding out that half of my homework were disappeared so after that day a always put under the book another couple of them or my Italian book (700 pages)and it never happened again So lesson learned if you use that type of pen never leave your paper/notebook near a heat source 😬😅 4:22 that's why now there's only the on or off "option" 4:33 same thing with the alcohol bottle (the pink ones) 8:00 my childhood ❤
Dude, a teacher of mine said that she had to fail a student a really important exam because she left the exams in the car during summer. When she went to mark them, one was blank and at first she didn't know what happened so she just failed them. It was then discovered that it was because of the eraseble ink, and from that point forward, for that official exam, it is advised to not use erasable ink to do them.
@@yootto5085this happened to some notes I had taken when I left them in a hot car. luckily the ink didn't disappear completely, and I had only been using the pen to highlight important words, so all I had to do was go back over all of the words that erased.
I know this (not the science) cuz I always put a crap ton of hot chocolate powder in my hot chocolate and there’s always clumps of powder that’s wet on the outside Mmmm those clumps do taste good though
@@someonerandom6505 oh yeah my bad I was thinking of mean. middle answer still wouldn't be the best though, at least not in my opinion. that's just the most in the center answer but you could have answers ranging from 1 dollar to 100 dollars. and you could get a number like 60 or 70. I think average is better because it includes everyone's guess.
1:48 actually, you can make a vortex with a battery, but you probably need a couple more for it to work, there's also one more crucial element that needs to be added in order for it to work, you need to have a neodymium magnet, if you do have them all then just put the batteries on the sides of the glass or whatever cup or container you have, and just place the neodymium magnet on either one of the side of the cup or on top of the water Edit: so apparently i checked back at the video and... For some reason i could not FUCKING PAY SOME ATTENTION TO THE VIDEO. I swear i am not here to give misinformation, i just thought it can actually work. FUCK! Out of all days that i had the chance to rectify myself, why now? Anyways, this comment will stay as a stark reminder to misinformation and testament to my stupidity, mock me as you please
@@TheFunnyDictator ok why did i just realized i was wrong now of all days?!? Ok ok, i checked back to the video that showed it and apparently it was also fake. FUCK!!! I'm so sorry my friend, i did not mean to give misinformation, it was just me being an absolute BLIND FUCKING IDIOT! I swear of all things, why this?
For milk and powders you need to make a slurry first. Take some milk, small amount, add it to the desired powder and mix until it gets thick, then add the mix to the milk.
Hey, if you read this, the balloon trick does not necessarily require tape, just poke a hole through the balloon right next to the original inlet-hole, around a centimeter away. the balloon rubber is thicker there, and does not tear as easily, of course, if you poke it too many times, or too far from the thick section, it will still pop xD now, about that danger warning about the plastic can, and the san bruno disaster: in the disaster you mentioned, the gas mixed with oxygen, and exploded. but inside an aerosol can, there is no oxygen, which kinda defeats the purpose of your example/comparison. if you do light such a can on fire, the gas will likely just push the flame away, and even if the can runs low and the flame gets closer to the can, by then there won't really be any gas left to shoot out and explode in the first place. secondly, even if it comes out slowly to begin with, the plastic lid will melt and begin to seal it shut, or at least it will try, but the gas coming out will probably maintain a constant hole, even if the hole starts getting bigger, the flame will then get pushed away again as fuel comes out faster, and so it stops melting the plastic. but even if it kept melting, as the hole gets bigger, the gas rapidly comes out, and burns up, it would leave essentially no gas left in the bottle to explode. the gas has to have some time to mix with air in a stoichiometric ratio for it to genuinely explode, and that _takes time,_ which it doesn't get since its all constantly burning up, and not given any chance to thoroughly mix with oxygen first before igniting. trust me, aerosol cans basically never explode in this way, its just too improbable to get the perfect conditions, and honestly, *they often aren't even possible to begin with.* even if you stab the can with a knife, and hold a flame up to it, they usually just shoot fire for a few seconds before calming down, they still don't explode. on the other hand, they _frequently_ explode when left SEALED in a _heat source,_ such as outside on a hot day in the car, or in the sunshine, I had a lighter explode for that very reason. my point isn't that its impossible, just that its really not likely to happen, and it usually just melts and burns up, shooting some fire, but not exploding. so stay safe, but keep in mind that an exploding aerosol can and a big fireball are a fantasy expectation, and will never realistically happen. cocoa powder: extremely fine and dry powder is hydrophobic, since air is hydrophobic, and the powder is full of air, and since its difficult for water to flow through such small spaces because the surface tension and viscosity get in the way, this means that it takes forever to fully soak into the powder, and therefore it stays dry.
What you are explaining is the best possible outcome, and what he is explaining is the worst. So, still don't try this at home, even a 1% chance of loosing some fingers or getting 3rd degree burns over half your body is a little too much for me for 5 seconds of Pyro fun.
@@LouisNothing but that's not true about what I said, yes he was giving the worst case scenario, but I was definitely not giving the "best possible outcome" or best case scenario at all. and its easy to tell, namely because I said so many *"but even if x"s* in my comment. (there were three in total) also 1% is way to high, you read what I said right?
@@Metal_Master_YT Yes, i read it. I wouldn't comment otherwise. So first off even though you put "ifs" and "buts" you are still, in the end, describing the best possible scenario are you not? What could be better than what you described? Secondly, what would you put the percentage of possiblity at? Cause anything above zero is still not something i would recommend that the average person do under uncontrolled conditions, i.e. their backyard with a bottle of mom's hair spray and dad's lighter. Finally, there are a couple errors in your statement but i want to be brief so I'll give you one for now, (specifically the one that pertains to what we are talking about) oxygen does not have to be inside the container of flammable liquids for that substance to suddenly combust when it does comes into contact with the oxygen all around it, in fact, that is exactly what the OP of the video said. You watched the video right? Edit: btw, I do agree with 90~95% of what you said. Or is that too high? (Lol, Just joking on that last bit)
@@LouisNothing I too mostly agree with what you said, I really just want to make some distinctions and clarify what I mean. I guess I'll just clarify on the things you mentioned. firstly, by saying "but even if x" I am essentially saying, "but even if things go wrong or get worse". and since I repeated this multiple times, I am making the hypothetical scenario worse and worse, (I'm making it a worst case scenario, _not best!_ ) and letting you know that _even when its this bad,_ its _still_ probably not going to explode. point is, its certainly not the best or second best or even third best scenario anymore. so, what could be better than what I described? well namely _a scenario where all the even-if's I mentioned, didn't happen._ next, what is the percent chance? ok, I will admit, there's no way of knowing for sure, and it totally depends on the person and the can, but I know that its relatively low, however you look at it. next: *"Cause anything above zero is still not something i would recommend that the average person do under uncontrolled conditions"* well the problem here is that you imply that its a child, in which case the problem isn't the can, its the fact that its a child, doing an experiment with fire. you also say its under un-controlled conditions, in which case the problem once again isn't the can, its the dangerous conditions. you're also considering whether or not to recommend it, and once again, the problem isn't the can, the problem is the fact that a spray can flamethrower is not normally something you should recommend to people, namely because its a great way to start a fire or burn yourself, and its not exactly very useful. also, the statement: *"Cause anything above zero is still not something i would recommend that the average person do..."* is simply not logical. you are telling me that the mere presence of a risk, at _any percent above zero_ makes it something average people shouldn't do? listen, putting spray can flamethrowers aside, ANYTHING that you can do on this earth has risks associated with it, the idea that you must somehow avoid all risks when you do something, is not only unrealistic and ridiculous, but its also impossible. so yeah, that's not a very good reason. finally: *"oxygen does not have to be inside the container of flammable liquids for that substance to suddenly combust when it does comes into contact with the oxygen all around it, in fact, that is exactly what the OP of the video said"* well, there's a difference between "combusting" and "exploding". obviously we both agree it can combust, hence the orange flames that the can visibly spits out, I just don't think the can would cause an _explosion_ under those circumstances. here's a part of the video I clipped: ua-cam.com/users/clipUgkxFnfxhpw1aOtccwiDFwr8ejoBUMIRLIIH as you can see, he _also_ says that it requires that the gas be escaping, but *not lit.* otherwise it can't build up in the air. the same was true for the san bruno explosion he quoted as well. listen, I have studied explosives lightly in the past, and for gases, they must mix into the air or pure oxygen in large volumes for an actually significant detonation to occur, otherwise (for the spray can anyway) its just an overrated jet of fire. the thing is, _since its given that the spray can is already lit in our scenario,_ it therefore can't build up gas in the oxygen-containing air, because its constantly burning up. I'm slightly disappointed that I had to repeat this part, since this very concern was addressed quite clearly in the first comment, but no worries, if anything doesn't make sense, just ask! :D (sorry for the length, it always seems to get long whenever I try to explain things...)
@@jeremey2072 that works too ofc, but people are more likely to have a dry erase marker available instead of alcohol or vinegar. Especially somewhere like a classroom or meeting/board room.
My mom once used an erasable pen and accidentally erased everything she wrote after leaving a hot mug on the paper. She found out that you can reverse the "erasing" by putting the paper in the freezer.
Folding paper that many times would also make it thinner than a subatomic particle. You'd basically have the "string" that string theory is all about. An impossibly small, one-dimensional line extending past the Moon
about the folding paper thing. i don’t have a source or proof for this it was just a fun fact i learned when i was younger but regardless of how big your sheet of paper is it will be impossible to fold it more than 7 times.
Nice videos Good quality content with just the right amount of humour in your videos in general Can you explain why the water vortex always spinning in one direction in the same place
0:58 This is exactly why you should never be using erasable pens in an exam, the heat produced to erase the markings on one paper may be transported to the other pages, erasing everything on the other sides as well. I learnt this the hard way and had to retrace the ink of my essay for the final 10 minutes of the exam
Hand sanitizer’s flames are hard to see I think because they are mostly ethanol. Ethanol is a compound that is flammable, but shows no flame (unless mixed in with a different chemical)
Ethanol, methanol, propane, and I'm sure many other fuels all burn quite clear. The orange color in a flame is from particles incandescing, so anything that burns cleanly with just CO2 and H2O in the exhaust will be quite hard to see in well lit situations.
Okay, that last one I used to do as a child aLL THE TIME with no background knowledge as to why it worked, just pure amusement that only the top layer seemed to get wet unless I dUNKED the boi. 🤣
Water makes things wet.. it itself is not wet, because "wet" is a state of being that can change, such as something "wet" becoming "dry". If you "dry" water, it becomes steam.. which is technically water vapor, but not water itself. Water is always water, as long as it is within specific temperature and pressure ranges.
In most definitions, Wet means anything covered or soaked in a liquid By that definition, water is wet* *Any molocule of water that is surrounded by more water could be considered wet (Some definitions use consisting of a liquid to mean wet aswell, making all water wet)
the first one was obviously false because I have been using hand sanitizer and paper towel to clean my desk and it is very effective even erasing sharpie and whiteboard markers
You can't reach the moon by folding a piece of paper. Even if you could cut it precisely and reform it as much as you want, it doesn't contain enough molecules.
Lol we use to put globs of hand sanitizer on the floor in our college dorms and light it on fire when we were bored, completely forgot about that until I saw this
So the paper thing got me curious because intuitively there’s no way a piece of paper can be configured to reach the moon, right? If you’re using a standard 8.5x11 inch sheet of paper and fold it 42 times, it’s surface area would be 0.0005 nanometers, which is 1/1000 the width of an atom. Paper is made mostly of cellulose which I estimate to be about 1 nanometer wide. Assuming you can’t fold the cellulose molecules, you would need a piece of paper 41ft x 32 ft (rounded up) to be able to fold it thick enough to reach the moon, and it would be a little over 1 cellulose molecule in surface area.
Of course it's not possible, you would need an absolutely massive sheet of paper to be able to fold it 42 times. It's easier to imagine that if you could stack 2^42 sheets of paper on top of each other, the stack would reach the moon.
Bte the egg on vinegar has another thing about it After removing the bouncy egg out of the vinegar And want the shell to come back Try putting it in a jar of honey for a few days
If the sun rotates around the whole world it actually take 2 days which is somehow equivalent to 2 years so yes we do sleep for a year we just don't notice it so when we turn a year old we're not trying a year old we're turning a century old or something like that :)
Watching this I noticed that the is water wet question was posted and he said it was moist not we. I would also like to point out the fact that the water made the water measure thing wet making the thing say it was wet. Water can’t be wet as wet would be if a liquid is on top of a solid object, not if water was on top of any other form. My proof? If you were to put water on top of high blowing air and it were to keep in place above the air, we wouldn’t call the air wet. Same with oil and water since oil can be considered a liquid, pouring oil on water would not be counted as making the water wet, therefore water can’t be wet. Wet is only the term we describe when a liquid is on/in a solid object only.
Can you imagine how quickly hand sanitizer would be banned if it were that reactive? 😂
-Oops I applied too much hand sanitizer, lemme grab a paper towel and wipe some of it.
+Aight... Wait WHA- *burns to death*
@@X.Arybdis tragic and hilarious.
@@X.Arybdis Oh no I spilled my had sanitizer..better clean up with this paper towel-
*School erupts in flames*
this is pretty scary honestly, i can imagine someone lighting a whole building on fire and they couldnt see it earlier because the place was doused with hand sanitizer instead of like oil🗿
note: please dont use my idea
@@mako_happy Thanks for the guide 🙂
6:03 "water is moist" is potentially the worst possible answer to this question and will also now become my answer
Bro pulled out the Moist Meter
*M O I S T*
Alternatively, use the answer "Water is sticky"
Lmao. People be forgetting how humidity works 😂.
@@-redacted-6240well, water is both cohesive and adhesive, so unlike “water is wet,” that is objectively true.
The drawing can be big, the faucet just shoots the water out too fast, so the force of the water moving literally tears the drawing apart. If you let the water fill slower, you can get the whole thing to float
I remember back in 8th grade, my teacher put our test papers in front of his windshield and mine was bathed in direct sunlight. I failed that test because "I didn't answer the front page", thankfully it wasn't a very important one
Knowing the American education system, it was probably a science or history teacher too lmfao
Cool story bro
@@wolfiemuseyou say this now that you know how erasable pens work but I’m sure 99.9% of people have no idea that’s how they work
@@dakotahernandez9511 No, most people know that lemon juice is what is used to reveal hidden text. It’s in kids cartoons shows. But I appreciate the statistic you pulled out of your ass.
@@wolfiemuseLemon juice hidden text from childhood≠Realizing how a erasable pen works
I have a story about the erasable pen... When I was a kid I used to write my homework with that type of pen but during the winter I usually stay more in front of the pellet stove and put my book and notebooks on it...
I didn't know that the pen ink cancel with the heat so I was surprised when I come back after the afternoon snack finding out that half of my homework were disappeared so after that day a always put under the book another couple of them or my Italian book (700 pages)and it never happened again
So lesson learned if you use that type of pen never leave your paper/notebook near a heat source 😬😅
4:22 that's why now there's only the on or off "option"
4:33 same thing with the alcohol bottle (the pink ones)
8:00 my childhood ❤
Dude, a teacher of mine said that she had to fail a student a really important exam because she left the exams in the car during summer. When she went to mark them, one was blank and at first she didn't know what happened so she just failed them. It was then discovered that it was because of the eraseble ink, and from that point forward, for that official exam, it is advised to not use erasable ink to do them.
Dude, you took "Dog ate my homework" a little too far! 😂😂
"But my answers disappeared! I swear!"
@@yootto5085this happened to some notes I had taken when I left them in a hot car. luckily the ink didn't disappear completely, and I had only been using the pen to highlight important words, so all I had to do was go back over all of the words that erased.
i did a project with an erasable pen, our poster got laminated and all of the writing was gone😭😭😭
for the last one: it works better with pure cocoa powder. nesquik contains an emulsifier which makes the powder easier to mix in milk
I know this (not the science) cuz I always put a crap ton of hot chocolate powder in my hot chocolate and there’s always clumps of powder that’s wet on the outside
Mmmm those clumps do taste good though
Cocoa and some other substances are a lot harder to mix in to water because, it's hydrophobic. Which means they don't like water.
@@DayDreamsDoesGamingnon-dairy coffee creamer powder is another one of those
5:50 I was not prepared to get flipped off by jenga blocks 💀
The ballon one also works at the bottom near the seal where the ballon hasn’t stretched out
dont take the mean average, take the median! that way also trolls are left out
arent they the same thing? all the numbers added up / the number of... well... numbers.
@@Longshot24740 no.
The mean is all the numbers added up divided by the number of guesses.
The median is the most common answer.
Unless I'm misremembering...
The mode is the most guessed answer while the median would be the 'middle' answer of the sorted list.
@@someonerandom6505 oh yeah my bad I was thinking of mean. middle answer still wouldn't be the best though, at least not in my opinion. that's just the most in the center answer but you could have answers ranging from 1 dollar to 100 dollars. and you could get a number like 60 or 70. I think average is better because it includes everyone's guess.
TL;DR:
*Mean:* sum of all / count of all
*Median:* middle of sorted all
*Mode:* most frequent of all
1:48 actually, you can make a vortex with a battery, but you probably need a couple more for it to work, there's also one more crucial element that needs to be added in order for it to work, you need to have a neodymium magnet, if you do have them all then just put the batteries on the sides of the glass or whatever cup or container you have, and just place the neodymium magnet on either one of the side of the cup or on top of the water
Edit: so apparently i checked back at the video and... For some reason i could not FUCKING PAY SOME ATTENTION TO THE VIDEO. I swear i am not here to give misinformation, i just thought it can actually work. FUCK! Out of all days that i had the chance to rectify myself, why now? Anyways, this comment will stay as a stark reminder to misinformation and testament to my stupidity, mock me as you please
Can you please explain more? Please reply to me, buddy!
@@TheFunnyDictator sure, explain what?
@@demonthegamer3624 Explain how a battery can make a vortex.
@@TheFunnyDictator ok why did i just realized i was wrong now of all days?!?
Ok ok, i checked back to the video that showed it and apparently it was also fake. FUCK!!!
I'm so sorry my friend, i did not mean to give misinformation, it was just me being an absolute BLIND FUCKING IDIOT! I swear of all things, why this?
@@TheFunnyDictator it can power a turbine
"like all science experiments, don't try this at home"
For milk and powders you need to make a slurry first.
Take some milk, small amount, add it to the desired powder and mix until it gets thick, then add the mix to the milk.
"...and the buoyant *force*..."
Professor Dave: "I just wanna talk to him."
Surface tension...
Did u do physics chemistry and biochemistry in high school or only some? Also love the content btw
Thanks, and my school did not offer biochemistry, but I took physics and chemistry
@@JaDroppingScience thanks for response
@@JaDroppingScience did you go to college? If so, what discipline do/did you study?
Hey, if you read this, the balloon trick does not necessarily require tape, just poke a hole through the balloon right next to the original inlet-hole, around a centimeter away.
the balloon rubber is thicker there, and does not tear as easily, of course, if you poke it too many times, or too far from the thick section, it will still pop xD
now, about that danger warning about the plastic can, and the san bruno disaster: in the disaster you mentioned, the gas mixed with oxygen, and exploded. but inside an aerosol can, there is no oxygen, which kinda defeats the purpose of your example/comparison. if you do light such a can on fire, the gas will likely just push the flame away, and even if the can runs low and the flame gets closer to the can, by then there won't really be any gas left to shoot out and explode in the first place. secondly, even if it comes out slowly to begin with, the plastic lid will melt and begin to seal it shut, or at least it will try, but the gas coming out will probably maintain a constant hole, even if the hole starts getting bigger, the flame will then get pushed away again as fuel comes out faster, and so it stops melting the plastic. but even if it kept melting, as the hole gets bigger, the gas rapidly comes out, and burns up, it would leave essentially no gas left in the bottle to explode. the gas has to have some time to mix with air in a stoichiometric ratio for it to genuinely explode, and that _takes time,_ which it doesn't get since its all constantly burning up, and not given any chance to thoroughly mix with oxygen first before igniting. trust me, aerosol cans basically never explode in this way, its just too improbable to get the perfect conditions, and honestly, *they often aren't even possible to begin with.* even if you stab the can with a knife, and hold a flame up to it, they usually just shoot fire for a few seconds before calming down, they still don't explode. on the other hand, they _frequently_ explode when left SEALED in a _heat source,_ such as outside on a hot day in the car, or in the sunshine, I had a lighter explode for that very reason.
my point isn't that its impossible, just that its really not likely to happen, and it usually just melts and burns up, shooting some fire, but not exploding. so stay safe, but keep in mind that an exploding aerosol can and a big fireball are a fantasy expectation, and will never realistically happen.
cocoa powder: extremely fine and dry powder is hydrophobic, since air is hydrophobic, and the powder is full of air, and since its difficult for water to flow through such small spaces because the surface tension and viscosity get in the way, this means that it takes forever to fully soak into the powder, and therefore it stays dry.
Cap🧢
What you are explaining is the best possible outcome, and what he is explaining is the worst. So, still don't try this at home, even a 1% chance of loosing some fingers or getting 3rd degree burns over half your body is a little too much for me for 5 seconds of Pyro fun.
@@LouisNothing but that's not true about what I said, yes he was giving the worst case scenario, but I was definitely not giving the "best possible outcome" or best case scenario at all. and its easy to tell, namely because I said so many *"but even if x"s* in my comment. (there were three in total) also 1% is way to high, you read what I said right?
@@Metal_Master_YT Yes, i read it. I wouldn't comment otherwise. So first off even though you put "ifs" and "buts" you are still, in the end, describing the best possible scenario are you not? What could be better than what you described? Secondly, what would you put the percentage of possiblity at? Cause anything above zero is still not something i would recommend that the average person do under uncontrolled conditions, i.e. their backyard with a bottle of mom's hair spray and dad's lighter. Finally, there are a couple errors in your statement but i want to be brief so I'll give you one for now, (specifically the one that pertains to what we are talking about) oxygen does not have to be inside the container of flammable liquids for that substance to suddenly combust when it does comes into contact with the oxygen all around it, in fact, that is exactly what the OP of the video said. You watched the video right? Edit: btw, I do agree with 90~95% of what you said. Or is that too high? (Lol, Just joking on that last bit)
@@LouisNothing I too mostly agree with what you said, I really just want to make some distinctions and clarify what I mean.
I guess I'll just clarify on the things you mentioned. firstly, by saying "but even if x" I am essentially saying, "but even if things go wrong or get worse". and since I repeated this multiple times, I am making the hypothetical scenario worse and worse, (I'm making it a worst case scenario, _not best!_ ) and letting you know that _even when its this bad,_ its _still_ probably not going to explode. point is, its certainly not the best or second best or even third best scenario anymore. so, what could be better than what I described? well namely _a scenario where all the even-if's I mentioned, didn't happen._
next, what is the percent chance? ok, I will admit, there's no way of knowing for sure, and it totally depends on the person and the can, but I know that its relatively low, however you look at it. next: *"Cause anything above zero is still not something i would recommend that the average person do under uncontrolled conditions"* well the problem here is that you imply that its a child, in which case the problem isn't the can, its the fact that its a child, doing an experiment with fire. you also say its under un-controlled conditions, in which case the problem once again isn't the can, its the dangerous conditions. you're also considering whether or not to recommend it, and once again, the problem isn't the can, the problem is the fact that a spray can flamethrower is not normally something you should recommend to people, namely because its a great way to start a fire or burn yourself, and its not exactly very useful. also, the statement: *"Cause anything above zero is still not something i would recommend that the average person do..."* is simply not logical. you are telling me that the mere presence of a risk, at _any percent above zero_ makes it something average people shouldn't do? listen, putting spray can flamethrowers aside, ANYTHING that you can do on this earth has risks associated with it, the idea that you must somehow avoid all risks when you do something, is not only unrealistic and ridiculous, but its also impossible. so yeah, that's not a very good reason.
finally: *"oxygen does not have to be inside the container of flammable liquids for that substance to suddenly combust when it does comes into contact with the oxygen all around it, in fact, that is exactly what the OP of the video said"* well, there's a difference between "combusting" and "exploding". obviously we both agree it can combust, hence the orange flames that the can visibly spits out, I just don't think the can would cause an _explosion_ under those circumstances. here's a part of the video I clipped: ua-cam.com/users/clipUgkxFnfxhpw1aOtccwiDFwr8ejoBUMIRLIIH
as you can see, he _also_ says that it requires that the gas be escaping, but *not lit.* otherwise it can't build up in the air. the same was true for the san bruno explosion he quoted as well. listen, I have studied explosives lightly in the past, and for gases, they must mix into the air or pure oxygen in large volumes for an actually significant detonation to occur, otherwise (for the spray can anyway) its just an overrated jet of fire. the thing is, _since its given that the spray can is already lit in our scenario,_ it therefore can't build up gas in the oxygen-containing air, because its constantly burning up.
I'm slightly disappointed that I had to repeat this part, since this very concern was addressed quite clearly in the first comment, but no worries, if anything doesn't make sense, just ask! :D
(sorry for the length, it always seems to get long whenever I try to explain things...)
You can erase sharpie by writing over it with a dry erase marker
And you can erase dry erase by rewriting over it with a dry erase marker!
I just use rubbing alcohol, as long as it’s non-porous
@@jeremey2072 that works too ofc, but people are more likely to have a dry erase marker available instead of alcohol or vinegar. Especially somewhere like a classroom or meeting/board room.
The temp sensitive ink also applies to store receipts. If it uses that type of paper and ink.
Most do, thermal receipt printers can be way more compact than the laser/ink printers.
But they turn black not transparent
My mom once used an erasable pen and accidentally erased everything she wrote after leaving a hot mug on the paper. She found out that you can reverse the "erasing" by putting the paper in the freezer.
2:42 if you do this to a balloon filled with water, you might get some cool laminar flow started since that requires the water to be under pressure
This man just casually pulls out a one dollar coin
Folding paper that many times would also make it thinner than a subatomic particle. You'd basically have the "string" that string theory is all about. An impossibly small, one-dimensional line extending past the Moon
about the folding paper thing. i don’t have a source or proof for this it was just a fun fact i learned when i was younger but regardless of how big your sheet of paper is it will be impossible to fold it more than 7 times.
There is a myth busters video on UA-cam that proves you wrong
I guess the person that stated that didn't try a warehouse sized sheet of paper
I did the vinegar egg as a science project once!
Nice videos
Good quality content with just the right amount of humour in your videos in general
Can you explain why the water vortex always spinning in one direction in the same place
Look up the "Coriolis Force". Rotating motion in a rotating frame of reference has some weird properties
Google fake news
"The ink returned almost immediately."
No it didn't. Since the time of drawing, it was never gone in the first place.
damn that dry ice restoring the ink that’s dangerous 💀
Quick correction about the mercury one, its actually Venus with a day that lasts longer than a year
Mr wizard was dope used to watch him before school back in the day
On that Ballon one, it doesn't have to be any specific type of tape. Any tape will work
Richter scale isn't used anymore! Plain old magnitude is used without it. It's a different kind of scale that is supposed to be more accurate.
0:58 This is exactly why you should never be using erasable pens in an exam, the heat produced to erase the markings on one paper may be transported to the other pages, erasing everything on the other sides as well. I learnt this the hard way and had to retrace the ink of my essay for the final 10 minutes of the exam
Doodlebob became peppa pig for like half a second
Hand sanitizer would be good to bring for camping. Also for the question about how much coins are there, im guessing like $10.40
Hand sanitizer’s flames are hard to see I think because they are mostly ethanol. Ethanol is a compound that is flammable, but shows no flame (unless mixed in with a different chemical)
Ethanol, methanol, propane, and I'm sure many other fuels all burn quite clear. The orange color in a flame is from particles incandescing, so anything that burns cleanly with just CO2 and H2O in the exhaust will be quite hard to see in well lit situations.
Imagine if the hand sanitizer one was true, like, oops, got too much hand sanitizer, let me wipe it o- AAAA
Okay, that last one I used to do as a child aLL THE TIME with no background knowledge as to why it worked, just pure amusement that only the top layer seemed to get wet unless I dUNKED the boi. 🤣
So when someone brought a fabreze and a lighter to my school once they actually put our lives at risk. Wow
bro casually demonstrated spaghettification with doodlebob
7:48 that bug after you moved its house:
Water makes things wet.. it itself is not wet, because "wet" is a state of being that can change, such as something "wet" becoming "dry".
If you "dry" water, it becomes steam.. which is technically water vapor, but not water itself.
Water is always water, as long as it is within specific temperature and pressure ranges.
1:33 was an Amoeba rupturing lol
"If you put electrical tape on a balloon, you can poke objects through..."
GUYS BRB............FOR SCIENCE
“So I have a soil moisture meter to detect the wetness of water… and it appears as though water is actually moist”
Ah yes, a scary ethanol flame
I remember Mr. Wizard teaching me about that balloon thing back in the 80s.
"As long as the tape prevents the hole from cracking" 💀
Fire consist of 3 elements. heat,fuel and oxygen
Ahhh
Sometimes I forgot most hand sanitizers had methanol
I used to put hand santizer on my hands and light it on fire. Shit didn't burn if youbshook it off fast enough.
They use products just like hand sanitizer in movie stunts so they can get through the scene safe. It gives them a little more time.
I shit you not I got a nezquick ad at the end of the video after the nezquick spoon thing.
fun fact to test: does every second i spend watching videos at this aspect ratio shave a day off my life?
Society if Nesquick wasn't hydrophobic:
He turned doodle bob into peppa pig
Me & my brothers used to cover our hands with sanitizer and set our hands on fire to pretend we have powers
If I’m correct burning hand sanitizer makes a ethanol flame
In most definitions, Wet means anything covered or soaked in a liquid
By that definition, water is wet*
*Any molocule of water that is surrounded by more water could be considered wet
(Some definitions use consisting of a liquid to mean wet aswell, making all water wet)
For that is water wet segment, cover the entire metal piece and see what it says.
2:20
I actually did that experiment about 10 years ago but left it in the cup longer.
7:49 “Oh I’m sorry for interrupting, I’ma head out”
i got a nesquick add when the video ended lmao
1:30 I often see this on a plate while pouring water in a smooth way (no splashing)
the first one was obviously false because I have been using hand sanitizer and paper towel to clean my desk and it is very effective even erasing sharpie and whiteboard markers
1:55 OGs will remember this little trick from Blues Clues
Doodle bob looking like a dying cell
Doodlebob spilled out like a microbe.
I didnt know chocolate milk was afraid of toothpicks. Fascinating.
What a world we live in, where people just lie all the time and nobody uses their noggin.
You can't reach the moon by folding a piece of paper. Even if you could cut it precisely and reform it as much as you want, it doesn't contain enough molecules.
Lol we use to put globs of hand sanitizer on the floor in our college dorms and light it on fire when we were bored, completely forgot about that until I saw this
“water is moist” is not the take i expected today
The opposite of clickbait. Beautiful
Your doodle Bob is on point
So the paper thing got me curious because intuitively there’s no way a piece of paper can be configured to reach the moon, right? If you’re using a standard 8.5x11 inch sheet of paper and fold it 42 times, it’s surface area would be 0.0005 nanometers, which is 1/1000 the width of an atom. Paper is made mostly of cellulose which I estimate to be about 1 nanometer wide. Assuming you can’t fold the cellulose molecules, you would need a piece of paper 41ft x 32 ft (rounded up) to be able to fold it thick enough to reach the moon, and it would be a little over 1 cellulose molecule in surface area.
Of course it's not possible, you would need an absolutely massive sheet of paper to be able to fold it 42 times. It's easier to imagine that if you could stack 2^42 sheets of paper on top of each other, the stack would reach the moon.
@@IDyn4m1CI I did the math at some point and I think I came up with a piece of paper that was 30 miles on each side.
1:36 don’t call me doodle bob you dingle borb.
I thought the video said fart checking and now I’m halfway through the video and realized it has nothing to do with farts
ROTFLMDAO
0:58 and then the freezer makes it come back lol
I did the vinegar and egg thing in science class
Theoretically with the vinegar egg experiment, could we use it to make the chicken egg tempura don from food wars?
You can't fold a eight and a half by 11 inch piece of piece of paper 42 times. There simply isn't enough material.
2:47
“You can actually fit pretty large objects into here”
*how large are we talking*
I pray for the brain cells of anyone who fell for the hand sanitizer and paper towel w
Bte the egg on vinegar has another thing about it
After removing the bouncy egg out of the vinegar
And want the shell to come back
Try putting it in a jar of honey for a few days
Its venus that has a longer day than its year
5:50 "i hope you can see this because i'm doing it as hard as i can"
Tbh it looks like a middle finger
The salt doesn't have to be iodized, what makes water conductive are ions not Iod, just the natrium and chloride that are salt do thst
5:52 “Okay so this works pretty well”
model: 🖕
3:43 no way bro just did a thumbaround with a febreeze can
Alright, but can you explain why chocolate milkshake powder is harder to get dissolve than the others?
It's hard to dissolve cocoa or chocolate because, it's hydrophobic, which means dislikes getting wet.
Also, emulsifiers
Sooooo the middle finger is one of the most balanced bases on earth :O
The sink doodle is literally google gravity but in reality
If the sun rotates around the whole world it actually take 2 days which is somehow equivalent to 2 years so yes we do sleep for a year we just don't notice it so when we turn a year old we're not trying a year old we're turning a century old or something like that :)
Watching this I noticed that the is water wet question was posted and he said it was moist not we. I would also like to point out the fact that the water made the water measure thing wet making the thing say it was wet. Water can’t be wet as wet would be if a liquid is on top of a solid object, not if water was on top of any other form. My proof? If you were to put water on top of high blowing air and it were to keep in place above the air, we wouldn’t call the air wet. Same with oil and water since oil can be considered a liquid, pouring oil on water would not be counted as making the water wet, therefore water can’t be wet. Wet is only the term we describe when a liquid is on/in a solid object only.
4:18
A 1.1 on the richter scale is virtually nothing. You wouldnt feel it, it would only be picked up by machines
“Wet” is usually used as a word to relate to something affected by water.
I personally would say it’s *M O I S T* (take that you moist haters)
I can’t believe the same people who thought hand sanitizer would react with a paper towel are legally allowed to vote
1:13 is CRAZY
Not sure about it but doodlebob might’ve worked better if you turned down the water
Good luck having a piece of paper that big
at 2:21, a millisecond after the egg broke, i got a fucking genshin impact ad out of nowhere
Less Dense : does that mean Hot Air is Smarter ? & thats why it rises to the top ?