Would France demolish UK more in a nuke war? (2019)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 жов 2024
- Get MagellanTV here: try.magellantv... & get an exclusive offer extended to our viewers: an extra month FREE. MagellanTV is a new kind of streaming service run by filmmakers with 2,000+ documentaries! Check out our personal recommendation and MagellanTV’s exclusive playlists: www.magellantv...
This video explores UK's and France's nuclear arsenals. Their composition and the bases. As well as possible means of neutralizing each other's arsenal before it fires. Then it goes into population centers, their size and density and analyzes the possible damage that each side can do to the other. How would such a conflict go? Watch and find out!
Link to our Global nuclear showdown video:
• If US and Russia used ...
Music by Matija Malatestinic
www.malatestini...
If you want to support us, become our Patron! / binkov
Suggest country pairs you'd like to see in future videos over at our website: www.binkov.com
You can also browse for other Binkov T-Shirts or Binkov merch, via the store at our website, binkov.com/
Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos!
/ binkovsbattlegrounds
Follow Binkov's news on Facebook!
/ binkovsbattlegrounds
"Loses a bit less" is the best way to describe the winner of any Nuclear war.
@tfs2O3 the only scenario I see them being used is if Russia or China does something that triggers a world war gets pushed back into their borders and nukes the invading armies in a desperate bid for survival other than that maybe another Japan situation where a country is so costly to invade we just nuke em Iran or North Korea comes to mind especially since we know NK will nuke us in any invasion anyways
@@bootymane9907 Idk that sounds kinda Belkan
@tfs2O3 They would have also to destroy their pure running wild capitalism which destroys them, us, and the whole planet ...
@tfs2O3 Excuse me for my bad english. I am partisan of a mixed regime where the things too important for the society to be let to the law of maximum profit, as roads, public transports, strategic industries, national education or public health would be state owned or at least straightly controlled by him, and that the usual consumation goods like food, suits etc... would be given to the capitalist law of market for that concurrency ameliorates their quality; it was the regime that ruled France under de Gaulle, or G-B in his time; not the paradise, but at least an efficient and bearable regime. But since the fall of the soviet so-called "communism", free capitalism has no more opponents to moderate its jurassic mechanical and ferocious avidity, and it pillates and destroys the planet, wasting more and more ressources in the only aim to make more and more money for the riches, which leads humanity to a global catastrophe and wars, even civil wars, for the next generations... And I do not like that.
There is no winner, there is only survivor
Does this constitute as a hard Brexit?
That's good I'm using that in a joke cheers
Did you take that from Wombles video?
No pulling out at the last second, and not allowing you to claim child benefit is a 'hard brexit'.
Still not hard enough for farage, I'm certain. Not until there is a hammer and sickle in Whitehall will he be satisfied.
A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
Doesn't always work like that
Wanna play chess?
That's the idea.
I see you are a man of culture too.
UK vs France: Who'd win a nuclear war? ..... Germany.
Nop. Germany would be under atomic clouds...
But French and British people would try to quit theirs homeland. And Canada would be able to gain a lot of population. Canada would only to avoid a civil war...
@@Baddy187 If that war occurs and millions of people goes in both parts of the Canada a civil war is practically unavoidable. Otherwise, the Canadian prime Minister can be a peace nobel prize.
Radioactive fallouts will turn germans into real ubermensch.
Europe dominated by mutant Germans is worse than by non-mutant Germans.
The only nuclear weapons Germany has had were held by NATO it had no nuclear weapons of its own so best of luck with that idea!
Q: Nuclear war between UK and France? Who would win?
A: Cockroaches!
Tardigrades too
@Adam Beasley no no them gopniks will rule
The british ofc
Just like the british won all the other wars against the french
@@lionel66cajppppp0
You seriously think people will take you serious or you try to trigger the French ?
@Miguel Melchior
Which part of what I said is incorrect?
This is like arguing that a man who gets shot in the head twice is more dead than a man who has been shot in the head once. Guess what, they are both dead.
The UK just increased its warhead stocks to 260, so they are both equally dead now.
Nobody wins in a nuclear war.
keegan773 I don’t know. In this situation where France is pretty much scoured off the planet that seems like a big win for the rest of the world
@@cadetkidkilla lul
@@cadetkidkilla bitter about something ?
@@popkhorne5372 Escargot
@@cadetkidkilla you're a little bit sour, missed your tea and crumpets this morning?
Meanwhile germany looks at poland and let's out a creepy uncle smile
I actually think poland could hold its own
@@studentfitness5954 they wouldn't
@@drumond5027 against the Bundeswehr? They’d be fine
Must suck to be a German soldier now adays, a tradition and legacy of military excellence reduced to...the bundeswehr
Wow since the England v France World Cup quater final things have escalated quickly
When brexit negotiations go wrong
France: Bombs London
UK: Bombs Paris
France and UK: Surprised Pikachu faces
France bombs London... Rest of UK cheers and celebrates.
@@ryanxyz13 yea, maybe you would if it wasn't important to english heritage.
France and UK:
Both Nuke each other
Rest of the world:
😰😱
Germany:
“So........does this mean I can have Alsace back?”
Elsaß
Alsace & Lorraine are French since Louis XIV, way before germany was existed.
"In a nuclear war all men are cremated equal" - Dexter Gordon
A nukes war between Britain and France: the immediate aftermath would be Italy winning the rugby union 6 nation tourney...only way for them to win it :)
Hahaha well said
Obihugzenobi England lost 2-1 to Iceland and Croatia loool😂😂
Obihugzenobi Even Gary Lineker said “Football is a simple game; 22 men chase a ball for 90 minutes and at the end, the Germans win.”
stephane gouverneur but dude what do you mean wales or Scotland would win it
No, Ireland would win forever...
1 day after Anglo-French war: Germany, "so i'm going to take alsace lorraine off your hands for you, for the good of the people of course."
And the French would say oh please don't and roll over like the gutless nation they ar!
Bruh the video is about France and England and there are still people who manage to argue about Alsace Lorraine lol
Yes, but just wait until radioactivity diminish drastically...
@@shihtzu291 France fought all the countries around it for 2000 years and went from a small country to the biggest one in EU, don't even try saying shit about France as they surely kicked your country ass multiples times
@@ommsterlitz1805 - It ain't nice is it but France is always having a go at my country for this and that and now that we've left the EU they are being really bad to us and it pisses me off because we're supposed to be naigbours and we've done some great stuff together like concord and the channel tunnel but then they always try to cause trouble for us and come across ungrateful for the lives lost helping them in two world wars, when ever you get these types of videos the French run us down in the comments section and any other time they can.
"France loses a bit less" That's right, no one WINS in a nuclear war. Got that right Binkov
Yes nukes are political weapon not military weapon
@@ey6713 so they useless
Nuclear war between Britain and France: the immediate aftermath - Nicola Sturgeon demands YET ANOTHER independence referendum !!! 😂
Fr / UK nuke war.
France don't send nuke to scotland (Auld alliance).
Scotland demand independance.
England refuse independance of the lone part of the union to don't be radioactive.
Edimburgh become the capital city of the island.
@@himlingpatrice tbh most English want you gone, it's the government that's dragging their heels. we don't want see or hear Kranky the sturgeon ever again.. Just being honest. 🏴🥇
Nicola only speaks for Glasgow and Edinburgh, not Scotland.
@@davidthomas6566 Aren't the French/Russian more related to you than the Scottish, just curious to know ?
Everyone : talking about who would win if someone can win a nuclear war
Me, a french living close to Paris: well, either way i'm fucked sooo.....
Ignore all these people crying in the comments about nuclear war, Binkov. This was a very interesting and informative video keep it coming.
amen
What ?! Somebody not raging in the comments of a Binkov video ?! Impossibru !
No one wins in nuclear war
As an American, I beg to differ. We've already won one nuclear war.
@@costakeith9048 against a country that was struggling to get back up after midway, yep, won a nuclear war against a country that would've surrendered anyway sometime in the near future
@@_rk553 And we proved Billy Mitchell's theory that war can be won from the air alone. We just needed bigger bombs and nukes are clearly the ticket.
Who wins?
Cockroaches, the cockroaches win.
Trident isn't a warhead. It's an ICBM missile that carries the warheads.
Inter Continental Ballistic Missle missle?
@@mac2857 Inter Continental Ballistic Missile, yeah ur right
(I'm assuming ur saying that in another language)
We know that. The warhead is called Holbrook but it was classified until recently. Warhead numbers are increasing to 260 but from now on all data will be made classified again (2021).
Lets have a France and UK nuclear war just to see how accurate this video is
This comment section is still in the middle ages lol
Everyone loses in a nuclear war
Except for switzerland they got bunkers in every house
Stop scare mongering about nuclear power plants. LITERALLY the safest power production type in human history.
He talked about blowing them up, they may be safe, but not bomb safe
Errr, wind and solar would like a word. I get that coal, oil, and gas are horrendous, though.
I'm pretty sure blowing them up may have some negative effects....
The folks at Chernobyl and Fukushima might disagree with you on that.
Nobody:
Absolutely nobody:
Binkov: Nuclear war between France and the Uk
Wrong!
I think it’s safe to say we’re both fucked in this case
At this point I think this would be the only way for Britain to actually leave the EU.
Hahahaha going out in a blaze of horror.
@@chrisvinicombe9947 That’s happening either way 😂
And a year later here we are with all the vaccine and macron is crying like a baby.
@@matt7775 Yeah the only thing that went right for Britain... Everything else has been a shit show so far lmao and it ain’t getting better any time soon
@@Gary-bz1rf Biden supports the EU though.
Ah, a radioactive Seven Years War.
Curious People: Who'd win in a nuclear war?
The World: Fucking. No. One.
that's really only true in *mutual* nuclear war. In a one sided war there is a very clear winner.
@@SomeGuy-ty7kr I mean, the earth might highly disagree with that statement. Weird how it doesn't particularly care for radioactive elements getting spewed about as if they were confetti chips.
@@mastoner20 funny that you don't seem to understand how fallout works. Stop getting your understand of the world from overly dramatized video games. It's not magical devil dust or whatever your seem to think it is, and most of it would be contained to the place that has much bigger problems already. Specifically they just got blown up.
@@SomeGuy-ty7kr i mean. I get my understanding of Fallout from a college education. But thank you for letting me know video games aren't highly accurate on the subject matter. I'd have never guessed.
@@mastoner20 wow, college educated yet still clueless, must be an American.
Who would win a Nuclear war ?
No one.
👼 💀 wins
switzerland would win
Many people seem to completely miss the point of this video. It's just a completely unrealistic hypothetical for fun, to entertain a morbid curiosity. It's completely against the point of this video for people to descend into stupid, nationalistic bickering in the comments, or somehow get butthurt about a completely hypothetical scenario. Some are even acting as if it's going ahead. Relax. A war between both nations, nuclear or otherwise would be catastrophic for both. It's in neither of our interests, and probably never will be. Britain and France may compete economically, but we have long been friends and this would never happen. It's absurd that this even needs to be said.
I read the headline as "US vs France....." and thought, well this is going to be a bit lopsided
User Name oh, I'm not saying the US wouldn't be devestated, although France wouldn't be able to use nearly as many warheads against the US as they could the UK, their ICBM and SLBMs would work fine but their short range nukes wouldn't be of much use, just that the breakdown if numbers would be staggeringly lopsided.
@@johnpatz8395 Well we have a Military base in French Guyana, even if a war between France and US is super unlikely
@User Name Ahah those two 😂😂
One time they are best friends, the next day they are enemies
Hahahaah😂😂😂😂👍👍
No one.. no one would win a nuclear war, no one ever wins a Nuclear War.
The Brotherhood of steel. Hold my Nuke!
@Anti Mapping No, not it was not 2 Nuclear bombs where used at the very end of it. That doesn't make it a Nuclear war.
War: 🇬🇧vs🇫🇷
Winner: 🇩🇪
@AngloSaxon. I'm detecting some slight bias
@@b_scuit Slight? He thinks Britain can nuke America hahaha
@@burgereagle9310 Gotta love those retarded nationalists
plus im british but i love america
@AngloSaxon. 🇬🇧and🇫🇷 nuke each:other.
So their economy will be 0.
In this case GERMANY will have a Golden Chance to dominate EUrope.
By the way, Germany is dominating EUrope in this time too.
@@belgium6552 Germany already dominate Europe
The trident system is an Anglo-American project, not solely created by the Americans
Central europe: laughs... I'm in danger.
Imagine having a serious debate in the comment section of a youtube video about a fictionnal nuclear war between two member of the same alliance ?
And people wonder why the world is going mad down ? Hilarious .
Imagine assuming that a 100 year old alliance is a permanent thing especially considering the previous thousand years of enemy status.
@@conors4430 Dude gimme a fucking break. There is literally no way possible they'd get to any conflict, especially nuclear like wtf? It's a fun little hypothetical I guess but holy shit it's like just so ridiculous in my head.
Can't wait for Binkov to do play-by-play live commentary on WW3.
*Tactical baguette ! I N C O M I N G !*
There is a mistake my brave, it's
*Tactical baguette ! I N C O M I N G !*
@@Pantsugrenadiere
Bruh ,Thx
@@pewpewman._.3415 you're welcome bruh
Conventional War: Has winners
Nuclear War: Nobody wins
The first rule of nuclear war, nobody wins.
🇩🇪♥️🇫🇷♥️🇪🇺
We will help you brothers
Im ernst jetzt
Eigentlich waren die Hohenzollern mit den Briten verwandt ....
Eigentlich war jede Adelsfamilie und Könige mit jedem irgendwie Verwandt😂
@@hnk2460 Die Koenigin von England und die hohenzollern ist mit den prophet Muhammed verwandt
@@nilswettlin2012 Toll
You couldnt do it when you controlled France directly, what makes you think you can beat us now?
The running joke is, if the end of the world came, we brits would drop one on Paris for good old times sake....
Says a lot more about you being a backstabbing rat than anything else.
Oof
@@burgereagle9310 do you not know what a joke is?
Id this was to happen, Id say right up to before the big kahoona goes down, everyone on Earth would say
“Ah fuck, the Brits and Baguettes are at it again...”
No matter who loses the least, a Nuclear war is ultimately going to be pointless.
Pointlessness is the whole point of it.
@@neilwilson5785 Good point.
No true, if the nuclear war doesn't have MAD, you can wipe your enemy off the map. permanently.
@@himedo1512 That's assuming they don't have the same idea.
@@oneofmanyparadoxfans5447 What? that doesn't even make sense. A U.S. vs U.K. nuclear war doesn't have MAD, but they sure as hell are firing nukes at each other.
Take in to account that taking out London would be a plus for the rest of the UK.
Taking out Paris would be the best gift from the UK and the rest of France would be pleased.
Lol, but true.
Agreed
forget london, nuking birmingham would be the best thing france has ever done for the UK
There is no winner in such a war.
France&UK, if you have this many nukes then please send help to Sweden instead.. please target all our bigger cities and the so called "especially exposed areas". We will be forever in debt, thank you.
"Who would win a nuclear war?"
No one, its kind of the point.
"Let's go back to our nuclear war" that's something you don't hear everyday
Comment section so salty.
Oh and if you happen to live anywhere near these two countries when they have their nuclear war, you are going to have a pretty miserable time too.
The hundred minutes war.
"A French missile? Ooh La La!"
Le Grande Baguette du frappe icbm
i think there are parts of the UK and france that could be improved by a nuclear detonation, honestly
Yeah london and Paris.
@@kordellswoffer1520 i was thinking more along the lines of sheffield but that works too
Destruction of Paris for London could be the greatest deal in the history of deals
@@x-a- No. It wouldn't just stay in London and Paris
We all dead
@@hannahdyson7129 We are all marching towards death, since the moment we were born.
Love UK from France, will never come to a war, we are the west, strong together and too smart to fight each other's yet we love a bit of a banter but that's just 1000 years old love rivalry. ❤️
Welll carry on with the recent behaviour of France and some of the other EU countries it might just happen all over again.there is real anger in the uk over the way france in particular are behaving after we left the EU.
Ignore the other guy, much love from the UK. Ignoring current political angst, we'll always be there for eachother when push comes to shove ❤️
@@martinrye712 Nobody forced you guys to leave the EU. Imagine having a large continental alliance and leaving it based on a fake claim written on a big red bus and blaming all others in the process because of one PM's incompetence. Yeah of course France isn't glad about it. The UK is just as arrogant as France, so really, you guys should stop acting like everyone's mad at you because that's precisely what's annoying people. Then again, this is politics, and I dare say most real-life people just don't care and are very glad to think we all are friends because, in the end, we have broadly the same goals.
I stopped watching this channel a while ago and couldn’t remember why...
Then I went into the comments section. Binkov has the worst audience imaginable
Agreed
Honestly, it is quite frightening sometimes
Although there is a lot of competition. To be fair though I think most of the commenters are under twelve. Or have the mental age of.
Totally agree
A year later and the comments section is still a cess pool😲.
You have to admire the way France supports its own armed forces with locally procured equipment.
Next: *Australia vs. Emu*
Emus, but with rabbits allies !
Manchester, UK.
It's not often that in these videos the potential dead is referring to myself.
Note that French deterrence doctrine involves sending nuclear bombers *first*, as a *visible and cancelable ultimatum*, and not second after submarine strikes, which are not really designed to be canceled after launch.
Not all nuclear bombers would be sent during this ultimatum phase, though.
True but in this case where it's a full nuclear war these weapons would be used like shown
false doctrine change with Chirac
@@yberai what's the false doctrine because one of France nuclear strategy is using a nuclear cruise missile as a warning shot
No one wins, we all die.
Exactly! We All Die!!
Lol when the war over fishing rights escalates... 😂
in any nuke battle no one will win in my eyes
At least this time they won't late 100 years to end the conflict.
This will never happen.Respect from France, to our cousins, zee roast beef.
Why do you call us that? Its not like roast beef is an english exclusive unlike frogs legs or snails which while not technically french exclusive jump straight to your mind when someone says "french food"
@@anguswaterhouse9255 I believe it comes from ww1... UK soldier relied mostly on roast beef caned food... French soldiers saw that and Thus nicknamed them roast beef.
This is the story I have heared
@@h.richard7312 oh cool
Support France, from the UK
*There is 1 Impostor among us*
@@RealLewis when the imposter is sus
Support UK, from France. And don't forget Marseilles please, it's the worst city around here, even Paris is better.
@@xenotypos En fait, de base la ville est pas si mal. C'est plutôt la population le problème, depuis 40 ans.... Et je suis marseillais.
Man, those two countries are eternal rivals since the dawn of their culture.
I'm not British but as my county was an former colony of Britain i was hoping for the UK to win
To be honest im french and i still think they would win.
Where are you from?
@@ash4583 south america
@@gtgbrb.Chad.v1b nice
But no one win's didn't you listen carefully?
Scotland and Northern Ireland are up there saying "hold on a minute, we are not English".
@AngloSaxon. Excuse me? "idiot"? I know they are the United Kingdom but they are still different countries. In a fictional nuclear war I was jokingly saying they would be like "wait a minute, we're out of here". By the way, nice manners, you must be so popular.
@@LemonLimeFizzleWizzle
Don't argue with him. He is just too stupid to understand your joke.
Auld Alliance forever
@@dimachan200 Its what hes been programmed to say by Alexa 😆
@AngloSaxon. Before england should to demand the us agreement x)
>nuclear war
>win
thats an oxymoron
this is easy , this is how this would actually go
uk : good morning france
france : we surrender ! ( eats cheese )
Yeah the French sure do surrender quickly. Its not like there was a conflict between England and France that lasted over a century or something haha. That would be craaaaazy.
@@joshuabrant3487 It was a joke
@@leroiarouf1142 france does not have best military germany and poland has.
@@nikolehtonen3747 no. None of them have nuclear weapons, none of them have a semi-competent navy, France has the best military in europe. Look it up
@@trlacr1781 okey then why did france fall in 42days to the germans when france had almoust equal forces to germans poland hold both soviets and germans alone for 36 days and poland had smaller army and how about finland they lasted 100 days against soviet union and they forces had only ammunation for 2 weeks
If you think that numbers are the way win wars then why did france lose to germany.
Let’s be honest both the uk and France could obliterate each other I don’t think anyone would win everone will die
France: ~ 300
UK: ~220-260
China: ~210-270
Note: We can't know the exact number.France has the most nuclear reactors from these 3, so France might have much more.Those numbers are a small part ,because no one tells it's real numbers.
The scary part is 16 nukes is enough to cripple a large country like Russia
@@crystxlzx6442 eu's nuke are american. Only france now have their own nuclear capability without an american officer saying no
@@maverickwildwolf3871 good point there "UK bombs" are american made . they need US autorisation for launch
national industry garanty your indepandance neither F35 or brexit do
enjoy your chloro chiken dear pround english nationalist
for all other english freinds love from france and be strong
@@martialg9425 i was refering to germany, belgium etc... i'm not sure for the UK's nuke but if i recall it's american tech that was bought. So you only need have the brits that decide for a strike. Meanwhile germany can initiate a strike but if the american says no they can't engage any strike
@@maverickwildwolf3871 Germany can't decide for a strike (just like Italy) because the nukes are in American bases and controlled directly by the Americans, the nukes are only in other countries.
It would be interesting to see if an eventual war between the UK and France escalate in a USA+UK-EU war. What will happen to the American bases in Europe and the nuclear warheads in EU territory? Would them be deployed immediately after an attempt of the EU to conquer the bases? Would the US leave it to the Europeans to limit the deaths?
Please do Fiji verses Monaco, I hear tensions are ramping up...
Binkov your videos are great and all but it will be very cool if you make videos like 2 vs 2 or 2 little countries vs one big country.Like South Korea and Japan vs North Korea and China or Bulgaria and Greece vs Turkey.
Greetings Dr. Falken. A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
DID HE STUTTER????
Can we play a nice game of chess instead?
(while enjoying tea and a croissant)
"At the end of the war if there are two Americans and one Russian left alive, we win!"
- Thomas S. Power
It wouldn't matter. There would be zero survivors on both sides and I say this without having watched the video yet.
DEFCON 1
PLAYER 1 LAUNCH DETECTED
PLAYER 2 LAUNCH DETECTED
LONDON HIT, 11.1M DEAD
PARIS HIT, 11.5M DEAD
VICTORY TIMER STARTED
1337, swords and spears:
hundred years war
20XX, nuclear warheads:
hundred seconds war
I doubt nukes will ever be used in Europe proper, but if the french are so much more powerful than they were in WW2.....why are they still waving the white flag to germany when it comes to refugees, immigration, social unrest, and the value of the Euro? The EU was a noble experiment that failed uttlerly, and the UK is the only nation thus far that recognizes that. France "could" step forward as a force for influence and change for regional security, but they've regressed to the pre WW2 society of fops and victims who would rather sit back and sip their wine while foreign powers dictate their way of life. The difference is that this time, they have the power to stop it and actively choose not to. Sad.
Underated...
@@benb6274 what do you know about France that is actually accurate beside what you read on the news ?
[Robot Voice] The only winning move is not to play
France would not nuke Scotland
Only England and Wales probably. They'd form resistance groups in Northern Ireland and Scotland to fight the suckling anglos.
@The Nova renaissance I can only picture you stuttering with a lazy eye with a comment like that.
You’ll be first to go, where do you think most of the subs are based?
OK this premise is too silly, we'd both be smoking ruins and be irradiated by our own weapons!
Who would win a nuclear war?
*Vault-Tec*
In a nuclear war the survivors are the loosers. The hospitals were destroyed because they were in the cities. Now you need to rebuild from the stone age while dealing with radiation related illnesses and injuries.
A BETTER FUTURE....
UNDERGROUND 😁😁😁😁
Germany: "Just according to Keikaku..."
"Keikaku means cake"
Quick answer , neither
A nuclear brexit
Gentle Brexit ❎
Soft Brexit ❎
Head Brexit❎
Spicy Brexit✅
Pretty sure a mushroom cloud over London would blow to Paris in a day.
Nobody wins a nuke war
GB, because they are already acustomed to living in a wasteland
you win ROFL
Wasteland?
destroyed
The only way to win is not to play.
Tony Clemens too many 80s movies! The only way to win is target their vineyards... instant capitulation (the French have a history of instantly waving the 🏳 - the last time to protect Paris architecture).
@@StoccTube We'll just blockade your tea imports. You'll kill each other for the remainder supply 😀.
Wouldn't want the wind to change given how close in proximity the two countries are
Without watching the video, I'm gonna guess... no one? Because no one wins nuclear wars?
Well that would be MAD.
Nice one X)