Lecture17 Social Realism New Objectivity Dada

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 лис 2020
  • Lecture17 Social Realism, New Objectivity & Dada
    ARTH2720 History of Art from the Renaissance
    Travis Lee Clark
    Utah Valley University

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7

  • @2002yannick1
    @2002yannick1 2 місяці тому +1

    smart man!

  • @ccsfdiegoriveraartproject2517
    @ccsfdiegoriveraartproject2517 3 роки тому +2

    I think you stated progressives were pro-industry and conservatives were pro-environment then, a role reversal. Who had control of industry then, causing pollution, and continues to have control and causing pollution? Pollution existed then and industry was a contributor. You mentioned Progressives wanted to take control of industry, but they never did. Also, taking control of it is different than keeping the negative aspects of it such as pollution. Can you elaborate or give references?

  • @normanstratford9329
    @normanstratford9329 3 роки тому +2

    Unfortunately this movement in art was a bit like a con and even though it is understandable that a ready is art, I feel that the artist has to transform it into a new way of understanding visually. Art is a language and can evolve, but there is no bounds in creativity.

    • @arthistorywithtravisleecla6343
      @arthistorywithtravisleecla6343  3 роки тому +4

      If your whole movement is designed to show that art itself is a fraud, then the method makes sense. Again, I think even Duchamp would think it was odd for people to take it seriously when the point was that we shouldn't take anything in art seriously. If you think all art is a kind of fraud, then a urinal is just an extreme way to point that out.

  • @rollinstonesdontsuck
    @rollinstonesdontsuck 2 роки тому

    Gavrilo Princip was not an anarchist.

  • @spellman007
    @spellman007 9 місяців тому +1

    Stalin was not a “dictator” he was a hero who helped lead the red army to victory & save Europe.