Bear in mind that GPU effects scores may be inconclusive due to the fact that benchmarks in Puget are mostly rendered with h264 GPU encoder where NVidia NVENC is substantially faster than AMD VCE. So pure GPU grunt could well be better with Native encoding using CPU, provided CPUs are similar.
My P4000 Quadro can handle pretty much everything I throw at it :) I do have 64GB of DDR4 3600 Ram and an 8 core processor and that does help too, but an older Quadro can still get the job done flawlessly if you only edit and you are not into gaming. I can still play games, but my only game is League of Legends, so I could play that with my case :))
Wanna add that another reason the 6900 xt is underperforming alot is due to alot of software that is optimized for nvidia tech and not AMD. This might actually change in the future with amd advancing more
It’s not gonna change haha at least I wouldn’t bet on it Cuda is superior and Nvidia has the market for amateur workstation on lock anyone who wants a GPU that works now go Nvidia anyone who wants to game only go Radeon it’s not even a competition though for the extra features such as Nvenc with Nvidia it’s by itself the main reason most people should go Nvidia
I used an 1650RTX for Clipchamp. Would overheat and crash my computer lots. THe results were good but it got to the point where I got the blue screen of death. As soon as I get that laptop up and running again, never will I used it for video editing again. Will look at the 4000 series someday.
I think the davinci resolve chart is outdated because I've seen benchmarks from hardware canucks in his 3080 ti review that RDNA 2 outperform Nvidia's GPU in resolve.
I wanna go crazy on a build now while I have the chance. To invest in myself and future, knowing that I wanna do landscape rendering 4-8k rendering, photo editing, photoshop composites, and whatever someone throws at me I’ll be able to handle
Thank Thank Thank you. I was almost about to drop the big bucks on the quardo 4000 because I was told by Nvidia that was adobe wants us to use. I've done some research and I understood that was not true but after you video I'm sold. Thanks a lot.
Rx 6700 xt or rtx 3060 ti with 13600k for Photoshop, video editing mainly and for games too. Which gpu is best for both. Ps. I'm just learning editing, So suggest me accordingly.
Hey! Honest and great video! I have a question about this GPU - I have the opportunity to get ASUS ROG Strix 1070 8GB (non Ti) for about 150$ or a much newer (2,5 years warranty) Gigabyte Eagle RTX 3060 12 GB for about 245$. My main concerns are: - Power usage (I have no idea how much these cards use, I had an ASUS Strix GTX 960 2GB OC and now I have a Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti 4GB - Will the 1070 be more useful for video editing like Davinci Resolve then the RTX 3060 because of bandwith speed or am I better off with 12 GB or VRAM instead of 8GB? - I don't really play new games, but the old ones like BF 4, DayZ, stuff like that... So I tend to invest the price difference to change my old i5 4690 + DDR3 to i3 12100F + DDR 4. Do you think that I should go with the 1070 now and change CPU or wait it out and change to the 12th gen later and get the newer GPU? Thanks in advance!
Thanks for the awesome video! We'll explained! I am looking for graphics card that can handle music production (no VST clips!!) And video editing!!! any recommendations?
Great video , i have a question though i want to build a pc for video editing for UA-cam and since I'm on a tight budget i have two options 1: ryzen 7 5700g with igpu which is vega 8 or option 2: core i5 11400 and 1050ti . I would love your opinion and further suggestions, thanks in advance
Can this subject be applied for making movies like the "Harry Potter Franchise", "Pirates of the Caribbean Franchise", Or even "Indiana Jones Franchise"?...if so, what graphics card will I need if I used it with Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve?
Can you help me with just a suggestion......Will a R7 5700g with 32MB 3200mhz RAM be able to give smooth timeline performance ? On a mere i3 6100 Vegas pro timeline scrubbing with 4K GH5 footage is slight sticky and with effects added we need to go to DRAFT > QUARTER to see the video without dropping frames, during renders it uses the processor 100%, but when timeline scrubbing etc its not using the processor more than 20-50% at max and the IGPU is at 7-10% while its stuttering, then why stutter, OS and all the media is on NVME and SSD that too. What gives ? I only want better timeline performance....so will a 5700g work at least twice better than this i3 ? Your comment will help as i need to upgrade immediately. Later i will add a graphics card like 1660ti or 1080ti ? The key clue is that for my 4K video work....an i3 6100 is able to do it but with struggle. So i just want 2-3 times better than this......not 10 times better with extremely expensive hardware that shows a mere 5x better performance.
My 1070 8gb didn't speed up things much, so it was pretty much a bust for Sony Movie Studio (Vegas). I mean, it speeds it up a little bit, but it wasn't breathtaking...
This video is very thorough but 5 minutes in and I still didnt have a clear answer for what gpu is best for certain task. For instance you gave the best choice for Adobe but didnt say if that best choice was simply because of performance. The best performance may be way to expensive for a normal person.
I like your video. We all know the higher end graphic cared will do better. For me I am trying to replace my GTX 950 2vram video card for something newer. My rig is a 8 core AMD 3700X with 32 DDR Ram. I am looking at cards like a RTX 3050 or RX 6600 for my replacement. I wish you would have shown stats for these cards. I know you can not show every card and the best should have been there. Realistic I do not have 3 or 4 thousand dollars for a video card. Hard these days to come up with 3 to 5 hundred dollars. Thanks for the video. I got a lot of use out of the GTX 9050 card do to my new build using it form an AMD 8120 CPU 12 year old rig. Hoping to get something that I can get that much use out of.
Can someone plz tell me if i should get an i7 12700 or the Ryzen7 5700g....for editing 4K 150mbps type mp4 footage on PrePro. Which will give me the fastest timeline scrub/grading/fx performance (renders i dont care...i can wait). Urgent suggestions needed plz. First few months i want to edit without a graphics card only using IGPU.
HELP!....PLEASE HELP! I purchased the GTX 1070 Ti to use with my Razer Core X and my Lenovo laptop (X1 Yoga, 5th gen, 16 gig ram, i7, windows 10 64 bit, 4k screen) There has been no improvement in the choppy playback in Davinci resolve. Ive tried every "fix"on youtube including downgrading the resolution of the clip and screen. Ive gone into the windows graphic adjustments as well as the Nvidia adjustments. The GPU utilization stays at or near 0% while the clips plays, briefly spiking up to 13%, or 21% or 8%...then back down to 0%. How can I fix this? did I get the wrong gpu? Neither the GeForce Experience or Nvidia app allow me to control GPU utilization. Im not sure if thats what "overclocking" means but I cant do it with this gpu. should i get a better card? New update 2 weeks later now i have the nvidia RTX 2060. there has been no improvement. WTF?
@@Hardik_P Thanks but I resolved the issue by getting a Mac m1 pro. I had consulted several "experts" but all of them were gamers and not editors who were using a similar setup. So there advice was guesses. What I eventually realized is that none of these companies thought to optimize there systems for video editing. Only for gaming. UA-cam told me that DaVinci resolve was a gpu heavy program. But resolve ignored my external gpu. Razor should have included a way to force gpu utilization for editing but they didn't. I waisted a lot of money and time to learn this valuable lesson.
Honestly not too familiar with overclocking myself, but I do think it could potentially help. I'd just be careful not to push your CPU too hard as you could run into other problems. Also this might be a good subreddit to ask in case some experienced editors or 3D artists have tried that: www.reddit.com/r/overclocking/
@@Slicktune Oh that makes sense, sorry for the confusion! Yes I think it will benefit the render times. Some of the comments here mention it: www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/comments/3l6tv5/overclocking_for_3d_rendering/
Thanks a lot for this, Im trying to understand what external devices can I use for my desktop which has 16 gigs of RAM but has a low gpu for Premier pro/after effects. Some 3D features don’t work in photoshop either, I’m assuming bc of the same problem. I’m looking for an external device bc I don’t know anyone who can fix the hard drive on my desktop and it would be more economical for me
I'm curious, did you ever get your external gpu to work like you wanted it to for editing?. I never did so I went to BandH photo and got an M1 Pro Mac and never looked back. Best money I ever spent. I hope you had better luck
Ok so I'm confused, I use Vegas Pro 19 by the way and I'm considering buying a new PC soon so was wondering about the graphics card or not. I basically edit pretty simple video's to a degree though I do use a lot of effects and transitions in the video's too, which I do notice on my current PC when rendering it will go a little slower as the transition or effect comes in but it speeds up once it's got past the initial effect also, I do also like to render in 4K so what would be a good reasonable priced graphics card to make this a little better? I don't want to be spending stupid money as it's not the be all and end all in regards to render speed but it would be nice to have a little something when I can, so any advice would be much appreciated!! ❤️🙏
I know this comment is a couple months old, but I thought I’d still comment just in case you never found an answer. This answer is based on my very unscientific results I’ve noticed after using the Studio version of resolve for the past year. Fusion requires a massive amount of GPU power. If you’re planning on doing editing that has a lot of fusion clips in your timeline, you’ll want a nice GPU for smooth playback. Otherwise, the GPU mostly gets used for rendering. I notice GPU usage stays in the low 10-20% range while in playback/editing, but almost 100% usage when rendering. Another thing to note is that if you want to do things like supersampling, you’ll need an incredibly large amount of VRAM. I have an 8gb card and it’s not enough for supersampling. That’s a very niche case however, but it’s worth mentioning.
@@PopTartHeaven wow i actually was looking for this exact answer. so thanks on my end. I Edit quite a bit with loads of clips green screen effects and such so forth .im currently on 1060 6gb thinking of moving to 1070 8gb. I noticed near the end of editing my long memed up super sampled clips id get some studers sometimes depending what part of the time line im on. and it can be realy hard to tell If that part of the video is how i want it to be or looks/sounds good let alone is fine if it keeps hitchin their even if its just a second. Really minor thing but this upgrade should help thanks alot.
@@greatestgamer00 awesome, I’m glad I could help with my answer. I’m not sure what prices are like, but if you’re doing supersampling, it might make more sense to look at a 1080ti with 11Gb of VRAM. One last thing worth mentioning is that fusion clips will also benefit greatly from a higher core count CPU. I’m not sure what you have, but I’ve found that a minimum of a 6-core CPU is needed. When Blackmagic recommends an 8-core CPU, they mean it haha.
![GPU Buying Guide for CREATORS - How to Choose a GPU? [Video, Photo + 3D]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FUcG_xGZt7k/mqdefault.jpg)
![GPU Buying Guide for CREATORS - How to Choose a GPU? [Video, Photo + 3D]](/img/tr.png)
So, where is After Effect? You mention it, but never explain it.
I think that this was the best video on this subject on UA-cam. Thank you so much :)
Wow Yossi, that means the world! Thank you so much.
Bear in mind that GPU effects scores may be inconclusive due to the fact that benchmarks in Puget are mostly rendered with h264 GPU encoder where NVidia NVENC is substantially faster than AMD VCE. So pure GPU grunt could well be better with Native encoding using CPU, provided CPUs are similar.
Good point! Thanks for the insights Mari, this is very helpful.
My P4000 Quadro can handle pretty much everything I throw at it :) I do have 64GB of DDR4 3600 Ram and an 8 core processor and that does help too, but an older Quadro can still get the job done flawlessly if you only edit and you are not into gaming. I can still play games, but my only game is League of Legends, so I could play that with my case :))
how does that stack up compared to a RTX 2070 Super? I'm thinking about upgrading but don't really have a ton of cash to do so, lol.
Am I the only one using Vegas Pro in 2022 ? I want to use it to edit as a freelance videographer but the industry is all about premiere ...
Best video I’ve seen breaking down video card requirements.
That means a lot Angie, thank you!
Wanna add that another reason the 6900 xt is underperforming alot is due to alot of software that is optimized for nvidia tech and not AMD. This might actually change in the future with amd advancing more
Thanks for your comment, really appreciate the insights
It’s not gonna change haha at least I wouldn’t bet on it Cuda is superior and Nvidia has the market for amateur workstation on lock anyone who wants a GPU that works now go Nvidia anyone who wants to game only go Radeon it’s not even a competition though for the extra features such as Nvenc with Nvidia it’s by itself the main reason most people should go Nvidia
@@Filtergrade 1050 ti vs M4000M which one is hetter for video editing Sony vegas 15
Hi how are you. I use davinci resolve and also use fusion and effects so what is suitable for me now from GPU and CPU
Good video! Thanks
Awesome that you mentioned some info on GPUs and Vegas!
Cheers :)
Your video cleared my all doubts.Thanks.
Cheers Tarun!
I used an 1650RTX for Clipchamp. Would overheat and crash my computer lots. THe results were good but it got to the point where I got the blue screen of death. As soon as I get that laptop up and running again, never will I used it for video editing again. Will look at the 4000 series someday.
Is testing with the davinci done with the studio or free version? Nice video otherways!
you are the best >> keep going bro
Thank you so much!
This was excellent and help me a lot.
Thanks so much T C!
I think the davinci resolve chart is outdated because I've seen benchmarks from hardware canucks in his 3080 ti review that RDNA 2 outperform Nvidia's GPU in resolve.
Link please
@@CarlJohnson-im9zh ua-cam.com/video/qHqesWMY9OU/v-deo.html
@@NipahAllDay ty that's good amd improve their performance in video editing
I wanna go crazy on a build now while I have the chance. To invest in myself and future, knowing that I wanna do landscape rendering 4-8k rendering, photo editing, photoshop composites, and whatever someone throws at me I’ll be able to handle
Go off!! 🔥🔥
Thank Thank Thank you. I was almost about to drop the big bucks on the quardo 4000 because I was told by Nvidia that was adobe wants us to use. I've done some research and I understood that was not true but after you video I'm sold. Thanks a lot.
Thanks so much for your comment SUTV! We really appreciate your thoughts here :)
Rx 6700 xt or rtx 3060 ti with 13600k for Photoshop, video editing mainly and for games too. Which gpu is best for both.
Ps. I'm just learning editing, So suggest me accordingly.
T1000 good for video rendering in edius x?
Very helpfull info!! Thanks for all the effort!!
Thanks so much Emile!!
Is rtx a4000 good for foto editering
Very informative, thanks!
Thanks so much!
Hey! Honest and great video! I have a question about this GPU - I have the opportunity to get ASUS ROG Strix 1070 8GB (non Ti) for about 150$ or a much newer (2,5 years warranty) Gigabyte Eagle RTX 3060 12 GB for about 245$.
My main concerns are:
- Power usage (I have no idea how much these cards use, I had an ASUS Strix GTX 960 2GB OC and now I have a Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti 4GB
- Will the 1070 be more useful for video editing like Davinci Resolve then the RTX 3060 because of bandwith speed or am I better off with 12 GB or VRAM instead of 8GB?
- I don't really play new games, but the old ones like BF 4, DayZ, stuff like that... So I tend to invest the price difference to change my old i5 4690 + DDR3 to i3 12100F + DDR 4. Do you think that I should go with the 1070 now and change CPU or wait it out and change to the 12th gen later and get the newer GPU?
Thanks in advance!
My card is Radeon RX 570.
Nice one
Thanks for the awesome video! We'll explained! I am looking for graphics card that can handle music production (no VST clips!!) And video editing!!! any recommendations?
M still happy with my 950 and 1050 ti
What about Intel arc?
Well thought out video
Thanks a bunch Ben
Great video , i have a question though i want to build a pc for video editing for UA-cam and since I'm on a tight budget i have two options 1: ryzen 7 5700g with igpu which is vega 8 or option 2: core i5 11400 and 1050ti . I would love your opinion and further suggestions, thanks in advance
Can this subject be applied for making movies like the "Harry Potter Franchise", "Pirates of the Caribbean Franchise", Or even "Indiana Jones Franchise"?...if so, what graphics card will I need if I used it with Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve?
Look at the higher end graphics cards like the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090. Not sure this is up to Hollywood standards, but it is a very powerful GPU.
Can you help me with just a suggestion......Will a R7 5700g with 32MB 3200mhz RAM be able to give smooth timeline performance ? On a mere i3 6100 Vegas pro timeline scrubbing with 4K GH5 footage is slight sticky and with effects added we need to go to DRAFT > QUARTER to see the video without dropping frames, during renders it uses the processor 100%, but when timeline scrubbing etc its not using the processor more than 20-50% at max and the IGPU is at 7-10% while its stuttering, then why stutter, OS and all the media is on NVME and SSD that too. What gives ? I only want better timeline performance....so will a 5700g work at least twice better than this i3 ?
Your comment will help as i need to upgrade immediately. Later i will add a graphics card like 1660ti or 1080ti ?
The key clue is that for my 4K video work....an i3 6100 is able to do it but with struggle. So i just want 2-3 times better than this......not 10 times better with extremely expensive hardware that shows a mere 5x better performance.
is a i7 12700f & RTX 2060 6gb good for editing?
My 1070 8gb didn't speed up things much, so it was pretty much a bust for Sony Movie Studio (Vegas). I mean, it speeds it up a little bit, but it wasn't breathtaking...
Why none of these lists include rtx 3060 12gb?
What if hard core video editing (70% after effects 30% premiere pro)? Which GPU series are the minimum requirement for the hard core after effect ?
I try to useTESLA 8G to test video editing （Premiere）Now i'm using 1060 3GB ,So i need to mix them 1060 + Tesla 8g
This video is very thorough but 5 minutes in and I still didnt have a clear answer for what gpu is best for certain task. For instance you gave the best choice for Adobe but didnt say if that best choice was simply because of performance. The best performance may be way to expensive for a normal person.
I like your video. We all know the higher end graphic cared will do better. For me I am trying to replace my GTX 950 2vram video card for something newer. My rig is a 8 core AMD 3700X with 32 DDR Ram. I am looking at cards like a RTX 3050 or RX 6600 for my replacement. I wish you would have shown stats for these cards. I know you can not show every card and the best should have been there. Realistic I do not have 3 or 4 thousand dollars for a video card. Hard these days to come up with 3 to 5 hundred dollars. Thanks for the video. I got a lot of use out of the GTX 9050 card do to my new build using it form an AMD 8120 CPU 12 year old rig. Hoping to get something that I can get that much use out of.
what did you end up getting? cause i'm looking for both these cards right know and still haven't decided yet.
For DaVinci Resolve i use 2 vega 64 ..
can a quadro t400 2gb outperform a gtx 1650 4gb laptop variant in export times, playback experience???
quite interested in this question as well
I just bought a second hand RTX A4000 16GB VRAM and 6144 CUDA Cores. have a look on ebay!
Can someone plz tell me if i should get an i7 12700 or the Ryzen7 5700g....for editing 4K 150mbps type mp4 footage on PrePro. Which will give me the fastest timeline scrub/grading/fx performance (renders i dont care...i can wait). Urgent suggestions needed plz. First few months i want to edit without a graphics card only using IGPU.
HELP!....PLEASE HELP!
I purchased the GTX 1070 Ti to use with my Razer Core X and my Lenovo laptop (X1 Yoga, 5th gen, 16 gig ram, i7, windows 10 64 bit, 4k screen) There has been no improvement in the choppy playback in Davinci resolve. Ive tried every "fix"on youtube including downgrading the resolution of the clip and screen. Ive gone into the windows graphic adjustments as well as the Nvidia adjustments. The GPU utilization stays at or near 0% while the clips plays, briefly spiking up to 13%, or 21% or 8%...then back down to 0%. How can I fix this? did I get the wrong gpu? Neither the GeForce Experience or Nvidia app allow me to control GPU utilization. Im not sure if thats what "overclocking" means but I cant do it with this gpu. should i get a better card?
New update 2 weeks later
now i have the nvidia RTX 2060. there has been no improvement. WTF?
SSD? SOMETHING is bottleneck in your setup
@@Hardik_P
Thanks but I resolved the issue by getting a Mac m1 pro. I had consulted several "experts" but all of them were gamers and not editors who were using a similar setup. So there advice was guesses. What I eventually realized is that none of these companies thought to optimize there systems for video editing. Only for gaming. UA-cam told me that DaVinci resolve was a gpu heavy program. But resolve ignored my external gpu. Razor should have included a way to force gpu utilization for editing but they didn't. I waisted a lot of money and time to learn this valuable lesson.
rx 6600 8gb or rtx 2060 6gb bot are in same price in my county
5:36 How come this graphics card shown here is $399.99, but is indeed selling for $1299.99 when I googled it online? What is going on?
The markets have rapidly changed due to supply chain issues, chip shortages, etc. Unfortunately they are not going down in price it seems. :/
@@Filtergrade I see, thx. I hope the price will be back to normal when the pandemic is over. Really need one for video editing with DaVinci Resolve.
@@SheldonTam Same! I totally agree, hoping the prices fall asap
Can I use i5 11th generation 11600k processor, 32gb of Ddr4 ram 3200mhz, nvidia quadro t600 for 4k video editing? Please advice.
Yes absolutely
Every time you say NEVIDIA, a puppy in a Silicon Valley dies
Nope,my 1660 super renders with 30fps while the higher ones render about 60 or even more on vegas,so you're wrong in that.
If I overclock and undervolt my 3080, can that help with performance as far as timeline or rendering performance? Thanks in advance
Honestly not too familiar with overclocking myself, but I do think it could potentially help. I'd just be careful not to push your CPU too hard as you could run into other problems. Also this might be a good subreddit to ask in case some experienced editors or 3D artists have tried that: www.reddit.com/r/overclocking/
@@Filtergrade thank you but I meant overclocking the GPU, will I get an by benefit in video editing or is it strictly about vram and Cuda cores?
@@Slicktune Oh that makes sense, sorry for the confusion! Yes I think it will benefit the render times. Some of the comments here mention it: www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/comments/3l6tv5/overclocking_for_3d_rendering/
Hey, do you think the ryzen 5800x is a good choice as a creator? What graphics card would you recommend. Gtx 1080Ti or rtx 2060/70?
2070 is enough for Ryzen 5800x(8cores)
Thanks a lot for this, Im trying to understand what external devices can I use for my desktop which has 16 gigs of RAM but has a low gpu for Premier pro/after effects. Some 3D features don’t work in photoshop either, I’m assuming bc of the same problem. I’m looking for an external device bc I don’t know anyone who can fix the hard drive on my desktop and it would be more economical for me
I'm curious, did you ever get your external gpu to work like you wanted it to for editing?. I never did so I went to BandH photo and got an M1 Pro Mac and never looked back. Best money I ever spent.
I hope you had better luck
@@rashare1247 hi, I did not. I’ve been primarily working in Photoshop & Illustrator. I’m going to have to look into that.
Glad it worked out for you
Hackntosh or windows
My question is why the fuk is the 6800xt getting better results than 6900 xt. And its price is double than an rtx 3060 12 Gb in my area
Damn...my GPU isnt even on the list....sucks being poor
hello sir rx66ooxt for final cut pro ??
Ok so I'm confused, I use Vegas Pro 19 by the way and I'm considering buying a new PC soon so was wondering about the graphics card or not. I basically edit pretty simple video's to a degree though I do use a lot of effects and transitions in the video's too, which I do notice on my current PC when rendering it will go a little slower as the transition or effect comes in but it speeds up once it's got past the initial effect also, I do also like to render in 4K so what would be a good reasonable priced graphics card to make this a little better? I don't want to be spending stupid money as it's not the be all and end all in regards to render speed but it would be nice to have a little something when I can, so any advice would be much appreciated!! ❤️🙏
You’re telling me I don’t have to drop 2000 on a 3080ti?😂
RTX 3090 costs $3000 now.
4:10 adobe
Buy M1 imac
Lol that's not a bad recommendation!
Op
Stop selling shyt man.. even a cyeap gtx 1080 ti for 200 bucks used is MORE THAN ENOUGH!
i need to look up a 5 year old video ant paying 1k on pc crap lol
Does the GPU contribute to smoother playback and scrubbing or is it just exporting?
I know this comment is a couple months old, but I thought I’d still comment just in case you never found an answer. This answer is based on my very unscientific results I’ve noticed after using the Studio version of resolve for the past year. Fusion requires a massive amount of GPU power. If you’re planning on doing editing that has a lot of fusion clips in your timeline, you’ll want a nice GPU for smooth playback. Otherwise, the GPU mostly gets used for rendering. I notice GPU usage stays in the low 10-20% range while in playback/editing, but almost 100% usage when rendering.
Another thing to note is that if you want to do things like supersampling, you’ll need an incredibly large amount of VRAM. I have an 8gb card and it’s not enough for supersampling. That’s a very niche case however, but it’s worth mentioning.
@@PopTartHeaven wow i actually was looking for this exact answer. so thanks on my end. I Edit quite a bit with loads of clips green screen effects and such so forth .im currently on 1060 6gb thinking of moving to 1070 8gb. I noticed near the end of editing my long memed up super sampled clips id get some studers sometimes depending what part of the time line im on. and it can be realy hard to tell If that part of the video is how i want it to be or looks/sounds good let alone is fine if it keeps hitchin their even if its just a second. Really minor thing but this upgrade should help thanks alot.
@@greatestgamer00 awesome, I’m glad I could help with my answer. I’m not sure what prices are like, but if you’re doing supersampling, it might make more sense to look at a 1080ti with 11Gb of VRAM. One last thing worth mentioning is that fusion clips will also benefit greatly from a higher core count CPU. I’m not sure what you have, but I’ve found that a minimum of a 6-core CPU is needed.
When Blackmagic recommends an 8-core CPU, they mean it haha.