Intuitive Machines' Lunar Return: Second Mission Set for 2024 Launch

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 тра 2024
  • Dive into the thrilling saga of Intuitive Machines' second moon mission! Discover how lessons from the past shape the future as we explore the enhanced Nova-C lander, the ambitious goals, and the cutting-edge payloads set to unveil the moon's secrets. Join us on this celestial journey as we embark on a new chapter of lunar exploration. Don't miss out on this epic adventure to the lunar frontier!
    Chapters:
    00:00 Introduction
    00:36 Lessons from the Lunar Frontiers
    02:32 Refining the Lunar Chariot
    04:26 A New Lunar Chapter
    06:48 Outro
    07:20 Enjoy
    Best Telescopes for beginners:
    Celestron 70mm Travel Scope
    amzn.to/3jBi3yY
    Celestron 114LCM Computerized Newtonian Telescope
    amzn.to/3VzNUgU
    Celestron - StarSense Explorer LT 80AZ
    amzn.to/3jBRmds
    Visit our website for up-to-the-minute updates:
    www.nasaspacenews.com
    Follow us
    Facebook: / nasaspacenews
    Twitter: / spacenewsnasa
    Join this channel to get access to these perks:
    / @nasaspacenewsagency
    #NSN #NASA #Astronomy#IntuitiveMachines #MoonMission #NovaCLander #SpaceExploration #LunarLanding #Astronomy #SpaceTechnology #YaokiRover #LunarSouthPole #WaterIceDiscovery #SpaceInnovation #MoonExploration #CommercialSpaceflight #LunarRover #SpaceScience #LunarResources #SpaceTravel #LunarAdventure #Moon2024 #SpaceMission #LunarResearch #SpaceFrontier #LunarExploration #MoonLanding #SpaceIndustry #LunarSurface #SpaceTech #MoonBase #SpaceRover #LunarJourney
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 55

  • @wishm738
    @wishm738 Місяць тому +5

    That is absolutely breathtaking. I cannot wait for this mission.

  • @lennyskinnard3091
    @lennyskinnard3091 Місяць тому +5

    I just listened to the original then the remix and it almost brought tears to my eyes How Beautiful a persons creativity can be.

  • @paulinenigh6004
    @paulinenigh6004 Місяць тому +5

    Good Luck God Bless

  • @alanmcmillan6969
    @alanmcmillan6969 Місяць тому +5

    Great news! Good luck either your new endeavour.

  • @paulefofana7239
    @paulefofana7239 Місяць тому +8

    Nice

  • @thegarage6348
    @thegarage6348 Місяць тому +2

    When is the im2 mission going to happen

  • @longlakeshore
    @longlakeshore Місяць тому +2

    According to NASA the Lunar South Pole is on the rim of Shackleton Crater q.v. at 5:55.

  • @scott.a.schmidt
    @scott.a.schmidt 28 днів тому

    When will IM-2 be launched from planet Earth?

  • @edgartorbert819
    @edgartorbert819 Місяць тому +1

    No EagleCam?

  • @marcelthecat6846
    @marcelthecat6846 Місяць тому +6

    I am not a rocket scientist. Please explain to me why IM goes for a vertically designed lander as opposed to a more horizontal,lower COG to perhaps improve the odds of a successful landing? Thank you.

    • @user-McGiver
      @user-McGiver Місяць тому +1

      you need atmosphere for that... it's not ''rocket science''...

    • @alextroyan6585
      @alextroyan6585 Місяць тому

      Thank you , I think I was 4 when I realized that the taller something got, the easier it was to tip over.

    • @Cervin_Suisse
      @Cervin_Suisse Місяць тому

      need atmosphere to make a lower COG structure ? What did I miss ?@@user-McGiver

    • @javierderivero9299
      @javierderivero9299 Місяць тому

      @@user-McGiver Apollo had a lower COG...no need of atmosphere ....just gravity...the problem is $$$s and the design of the fuel tanks...these are very low cost landers

    • @javierderivero9299
      @javierderivero9299 Місяць тому

      I agree...they let AI to be on the pilot seat...AI is still not good to drive cars on earth...not good enough to land on the moon with a low cost design...Apollo had lower COG

  • @afam58
    @afam58 Місяць тому +1

    How can the really spend time on the moon for more than a few hours?????

  • @paulefofana7239
    @paulefofana7239 Місяць тому +5

    It's a shame IM-1 tipped over while landing causing it's power from the solar panels to die out after 2 days or something

  • @user-re2ys3hq1t
    @user-re2ys3hq1t Місяць тому

    Intuitive machines will get helium 3 at moon. It's congratulations for human energy systems..

  • @GODSHIB396
    @GODSHIB396 Місяць тому

    Shib sakti

  • @CORYJOHNM
    @CORYJOHNM Місяць тому +1

    NOK lost the rover contract?

  • @eugen-m
    @eugen-m Місяць тому +6

    why is there so much insistence on this landing system? on mars the airbag system works great. maybe a hybrid system between the two? the low gravity of the moon would help a lot.

    • @allangibson8494
      @allangibson8494 Місяць тому +4

      Aeroshells don’t work on the moon. The moon is also rougher than Mars with steeper gradients.

    • @markschoenberger7825
      @markschoenberger7825 Місяць тому +1

      Any time you add another system (airbags) you add multiple points of failure. Also the impact with airbags is not as smooth as a rocket landing. No atmosphere means you have to have engine braking anyway, so why not use it for the landing too.

    • @eugen-m
      @eugen-m Місяць тому

      @@markschoenberger7825 it seems that successful Mars missions are not bothered by this addition😁

    • @eugen-m
      @eugen-m Місяць тому

      @@allangibson8494 I noticed that most of the failures take place before landing. the probe reaches a stationary position and begins its vertical descent. and the most important is the landing area. with an airbag you shouldn't have to worry anymore. the gravity they put is much lower. you can use the classical solution up to a point, then you use the Martian solution. There it went successfully and no one complained about it.

    • @allangibson8494
      @allangibson8494 Місяць тому +1

      @@eugen-m The Martian rovers using air bags were size limited (and one failed). The later ones all used thrust assisted landings with sky crane systems.

  • @MikhailBaskov
    @MikhailBaskov Місяць тому

    Yaoki rover will be part of the payload. This is the only bit of real info in this video, tbh. The rest - many generic statements. You can do better.

  • @SirWolf67
    @SirWolf67 Місяць тому

    I hope they will at least consult the local school kids for an upgrade to their micky mouse lego design.

  • @stgeorgeist
    @stgeorgeist Місяць тому

    Landing connection to laner should be from top of lander not the bottem.
    may be twicE as LONG AND MAY BE ANOTHER LEG
    but lander is to high above legs incase of slight surface and speed on aprouch touch down .
    +

  • @Toolsofthepast
    @Toolsofthepast Місяць тому +2

    So how did they get man on the moon in the 1960,s lol
    But now only machines
    Come on people

    • @user-McGiver
      @user-McGiver Місяць тому

      actually, the Eagle faced a similar problem... but Armstrong took over the controls and corrected it... [yes!... the Eagle was in auto...] Did they teach you that in Moscow?... your comrades still haven't made a landing!...

  • @jctgf
    @jctgf Місяць тому +3

    Will it be another embarrassing failure?

    • @allangibson8494
      @allangibson8494 Місяць тому +1

      Depends on whether they take the cover off the laser rangefinder this time.
      They also broke one of the landing legs on the vehicle due to too high a lateral velocity.

    • @emonk042
      @emonk042 Місяць тому +5

      It wasn't a failure, it was a test flight. They learned what could and would go wrong and how to avoid the same issues next time.

    • @ashleygomez4057
      @ashleygomez4057 Місяць тому +3

      If you call landing on the moon on its first test run a failure? Hope this next one is extremely embarrassing 😢

    • @teole6364
      @teole6364 Місяць тому

      Probably you are CCP who is working against America

    • @user-McGiver
      @user-McGiver Місяць тому

      NOPE!... THE RUZZIAN TITLE IN FAILURES IS SEFE...!

  • @ryanhaase1271
    @ryanhaase1271 Місяць тому +2

    Some people will believe anything...

  • @beenflying1
    @beenflying1 Місяць тому

    I still haven't forgiven them for hiding the last landing, after they knew it had a slim chance of landing correctly after they found out they had left the lidar locked. They lost my trust that they will do the same again. The landing was the most disappointing thing I have seen, even compared to India's landing. No video and no telemetry.

    • @user-McGiver
      @user-McGiver Місяць тому +1

      I'm sure they won't mind....not at all!

  • @user-ei6tt6er1p
    @user-ei6tt6er1p Місяць тому

    Gambling with bankruptcy if they fail again

  • @stgeorgeist
    @stgeorgeist Місяць тому

    Same problem? to tall? short stubby legs
    5 legs twice out stretch area and long arms alway around
    extending to aid any off center landing .
    Moon surface can have many unexpected suprises
    very thin slim hair like shoot fexable rods may help make sure of a good landing

  • @mosesmarkw
    @mosesmarkw Місяць тому +2

    So how much junk will be polluting the moon by the time we can settle on the moon Just asking

    • @surf2257
      @surf2257 Місяць тому

      Why does it matters, if we step there, well take care of it, restore or use it!

    • @user-McGiver
      @user-McGiver Місяць тому

      @@surf2257 he most likely's a red, trolling their failures...

  • @thomasf.5768
    @thomasf.5768 Місяць тому +1

    🌖 NASA & IM need to form a partnership with Hasbro. Make a "Weeble" lander 🛸. Because:
    Weebles woble but they won't fall down !! ♟️